Color Checker And White Balance

Hello Everyone.
I usually have a shot from my Color Checker and create a Profile for that Day of shooting.
I have Two choices.
1- Click on the Gray Color of the Color Checker for a White Balance, and then Export the color checker as a DNG, and create a profile.
2- Create a DNG from the Color Checker shot, and Later apply the White Balance.
In other words, when you open the Color Cheker in the Camera Raw, It Is a Flat Image. If I create a white balance from the Color Checker
and then,  Export it as a DNG to create a Profile Is It more Accurate ?
Dose It make any different ?
NOTE:
I get a better White Balance shooting either the Gray color from the Color Checker, Or a 18% Gray Card, rather than shooting a white color of Color Checker
or Shooting a white paper.
UPDATED:
I was reading this article that you should Aim the Gray-Card one third of angle between Camera and the Main Light or sun.
It says If you hold it flat next to your object It is Wrong.
Is this also  how you should  Aim the Color Checker One third of angel between Camera and the Main Light ?
Please read this article.
What's a Gray Card and Why You Should Own One
Also this Article Is opposite of the top
Using Gray Cards
Thank you very much For All Your Helps.

In your initial post you seem to be asking if it makes a difference whether you set the WB on the DNG you create your color profile from or not.  I don’t know that it makes a difference in the color profile but it should be easy enough to test experimentally, by making two DNGs from the same raw file, one where you’ve set the WB to as low as it’ll go, and one where you’ve set the WB to as high as it’ll go, and make a profile from each and see if you get a different look based on which one you use or not.
Then you talk about which gray patch on a color-checker is better to use for WB, saying you don’t use the white one, but one that is grayer.  My idea is to use whatever patch matches the brightness of whatever you are wanting to get the closest to the right WB.  If you have a midtone subject then use the midtone gray patch.  If you have a light subject use a brighter gray patch, and if you have a very dark subject then maybe use a darker patch, though probably not the darkest because there will be more error in that WB computed from the darker patches, so lighter ones would be preferred if you don’t have any other reason to choose one over the other, though not the brightest one, necessarily, because it could be clipped and unusable.
Finally you’re asking about the angle of the card with respect to the camera and the mainlight.  You don’t want it to be halfway between the angle of the mainlight and the camera because that would have too much glare to the extent that there is any glare with the specially-prepared surfaces of the color-checker.  You also don’t want it to be flat on to the camera, because that gives too much emphasis to the lighting behind the camera position (blue sky, green plants, red dirt, building walls) as blocked by the camera operator, so 1/3 of the way toward the mainlight angle is a way to mix in the lighting along the horizon with the mainlight to get an average.  If you doubt whether this makes a different take two CC shots, one flat toward the camera and one facing the mainlight, as the two extremes of the color balance variation and see how much different they are when eyedroppering the same gray patch in LR.
In your situation, with 100% strobes, your only non-strobe-colored lighting would be from reflections of the strobes off other things nearby.  Are you in a completely neutral studio setting and everyone except the model wears neutral clothing?  If there are close by light colored neutral objects such as walls and ceilings, then some of the strobe light will likely reflect from the clothing and off the walls making the color-balance tinged with a bit of the subject’s colors.  You could minimize this by taking your calibration shots without the subject or any non-neutral-colored objects in the vicinity of the strobes so as to minimize the subject reflection coloring the light.  Whether any of this matters depends on how neutral and reflective your studio environment is.  If your entire studio is matte black except for the model and backdrop then you don’t need to worry, but if it’s not, then there would be some reason to care.

Similar Messages

  • Color correcting and white balance

    There doesn't seem to be any tools specifically for it. What is a good way to white balance in shake? I can't seem to get good results.

    I use Mult to match a layer to another by viewing the individual color channels in the viewer.
    ColorCorrect is the uber color correction node.
    ColorCorrect is similar to the 3Way Color Corrector in FCP but without the graphical interface. Grab an image, apply the nodes and see what happens.
    But, as in Motion and After Effects, think of what part of the image you want to adjust whether it's the white/black points or gamma range or whatever and then apply the node suitable for that adjustment.

  • Viewing ppi and white balance in exif??

    Hi Folks
    I'm wondering if it's possible to see ppi and white balance settings for an image in the metadata panel within LR. I don't see it now and I don't know if it's just not possible, or if I've overlooked a setting somewhere.
    Thanks for your help!

    > What I would like to see is what ppi a given image is at before exporting.
    Before you export, it has none! Only x and y number of pixels per side. When you do export, the ppi setting is read by, say, Photoshop in context of a size to print, although that of course can be subsequently adjusted.
    I generally set 300 ppi for all but newspaper work, and check the box to not uprez any photos. The latter helps when I've severely cropped an image and later want to prep it for printing large-ish: Then when I open it, I see it doesn't have that many original pixels.

  • Tethered and White Balance question

    I am using the latest Aperture and also the latest Aperture Hot Folder to shoot tethered using my Canon5d to my powerbook g4 1.67ghz. The issue is shooting images with the same white balance applied as I shoot. Is there an obvious way to do this that I am missing? Or does anyone have an idea how to do this using Applescript? My main app to shoot is CaptureOne and white balance is quite easy to do using this app. I am trying to integrate Aperture into my shooting workflow not just my post workflow. Any ideas would be appreciated.
    - Rudy

    i don't know what your canon is like, but the D200 also has the ability to 'read' a white balance setting (probably from the same sort of calibration card that you're talking about... i've never tried one, but often want one). this calibrates the in-camera white balance setting based on the light you're shooting with. this again would hopefully get you close to correct without software post production (this is a theme for me: shoot correctly and then spend less time correcting).
    and you've still got the ability to tweak if its not perfect and then lift/stamp those tweaks everywhere else. i like the fact that CapOne had thought of that for tethered shooting, but i also don't like to stretch and pull my image data any further away from the raw data than necessary.
    keep us posted on how you finalize the workflow
    scott
    PowerMac G5 2.5GHz   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   MacBook Pro 2.0GHz

  • How do I include metadata information (aperture, shutter speed, ISO and white balance) to each image on contact sheet?

    How do I include metadata information (aperture, shutter speed, ISO and white balance) to each image on contact sheet?

    Just to expand JimHess reply. This are all the EXIF data you can include on a print. As far as I know, WB is not written to any standard EXIF fields.

  • My Vibrance and white balance tool have disappeared! Please help!

    I ALWAYS use my vibrance and white balance tools on my side toolbar and now they're gone! I don't know how to get them back up and running. Thanks so much! By the way, this is in Lightroom 5. Thanks so much!

    Rikk!!! I have spent hours trying to figure out how to get it back!! LOL. Thank you!!! What a silly, frusterating problem so easily solved. I really appreciate your reply!

  • Manual Exposure and White balance control?

    What Webcams provide the ability to manually set the Exposure and White balance?
    I know the nx pro ultra does, but I am having trouble connecting to it from my Java application.
    Also are there any other wideangle webcams out there?

    What Webcams provide the ability to manually set the Exposure and White balance?
    I know the nx pro ultra does, but I am having trouble connecting to it from my Java application.
    Also are there any other wideangle webcams out there?

  • I am on Lightroom 5 and the exposure and white balance adjustment tools on the right side of the scr

    I am on Lightroom 5 and the exposure and white balance adjustment tools on the right side of the screen have disappeared.  How do I restore them?

    Right click on one of the other panel headers e.g Tone Curve and a menu will pop up for you to select Basic.
    How it gets de-selected is not apparent but several users have had this happen since the release of version 5. It has ahppened to me on at least two occasions.

  • Does any1 know how to color correct for white balance/color grade?

    hey wasup guys just finished my 1st music video now i need 2 color correct & color grade. i willl be making the video black & white so i was told i need 2 get rid of any color cast in my footage. i 4got 2 set the white balance on my 7d when i was shooting sum sceens so i could use any help possible like what is the best color corrector to use or how to white balance my footage any help is greatly appreciated thanks.

    Check the basics and do a Google search. The first three listed will be videos, the next link points to the Adobe Help files.
    The basic tools are the same as in Photoshop but there are a bunch of 3rd party plug-ins out there that make the job easier. If you run one of the tutorials found in your Google Search and are stuck get back to us.

  • COLOR/ BLACK AND WHITE PRESETS

    I am trying to set up a new computer to print both black and white and color. (I am working on two macs fyi) On my computer, I have the presets already made. On the new mac laptop, there are only Default and Last used. I figured out how to make presets, but I cannot find an option for color or black and white anywhere. I am using Microsoft word for mac 2011. Oh and I checked the printer drivers and all of my updates and everything is up to date and how it should be. I was able to save it as a PDF and it saved in color but printed in black and white. Besides, I need to be able to set this up and print from word quickly. All of my other computers print both color and black and white from the same printer. Any help as soon as possible would be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you!

    its a kyrocera taskalfa. I wasn't able to find any settings that stopped just one computer from printing in color. Like I said, all of the other computers are able to print in color and b&w.

  • Lightroom 4 and white balance tool

    In Lightroom 4 i use the whtie balance tool and find point that give as high as 99% reading and it would work to set it as the reference point. Today i did the same thing and got a message that said Lightroom could not obtain white balance from that spot and to try again. i've never seen this before. even if i used  a spot that was 100% reflective. It would just render colors off.
    Today i did the same thing and a message came on the screen that Lightroom couldn't obtain white balance from that spot and i should try again. i was only able to obtain white balance if i used a spot that reflected no more than approx. 90%.
    what has changed?
    thank you

    The White Balance Picker sample area  in LR4  can now be adjusted using the 'Scale' slider, so yes it has changed from LR3:
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/white_balance_eyedropper_tool_option
    The readings you see in the LR Histogram in no way reflect the actual raw data values. The White Balance picker needs a sample area that has no raw data clipping in any channel (i.e.All four R,G, B, G2 channels 99% or less). I suspect the 99% area you are sampling has raw data clipping in one or more channels. If interested you can download RawDigger to examine the image file to confirm:
    http://www.rawdigger.com/
    I suggest choosing a sample area that is well below 99%, such as 85% to 95%.

  • A dumb question about kelvin and white balance in Lightroom

    I keep reading a high kelvin number is cooler and a low number is warmer, but in light room, in the develope module, the lower number ( 3500 ) is blue, and a higher number, (7000) is very yellow. What am I missing?

    Lee is essentially correct with his analysis but incorrect with the details. The Kelvin colour temperature scale is between Yellow and Blue, not Red and Blue as stated.
    There's a lot of confusion about this, with many digital photographers missing the significance of the difference between cyan and blue, magenta and red etc.
    To be fair, the printing industry has added to the confusion by traditionally calling printing inks Blue, Red and Yellow when they really are cyan, magenta and yellow.
    Even Adobe can get it wrong. In the initial Lightroom beta release, the temperature scale had the colours Cyan at one end and Yellow at the other. I suggested it be changed to Blue to make it correct and less confusing which thankfully was implemented in the next update.
    Despite decades of working with colour both in the darkroom and with Photoshop, I too struggle with the counter-intuitive approach of the colour temperature reading in Lightroom.
    Essentially, if you shoot in light that is too blue, then you need to add Yellow. So the Kelvin number displayed in Lightroom isn't the 'Mired' correction or the amount of Yellow added, but a readout of the scene's original colour temperature before the Yellow correction.
    This can be really useful. I use several different branded flash units with various reflectors and attachments. I recently ran a test, shooting a Macbeth colour checker with all the different combinations.
    I then used the White Balance Selector (dropper) on the neutral 5 patch and wrote down the resulting colour temperature.
    From that I could work out what filter corrections I needed to use on each flash and reflector to produce consistent daylight balance.
    Most flashes seem to be around 6000ºK but I had variation between 5200ºK & 6400ºK with the combinations.

  • Color correcting auto white balance footage

    I shot some video yesterday and at the time of the shoot, I made sure to set my white balance, however after looking at the footage I notice the color temperature slightly shifts constantly. I don't know why this happened, but it's too late to investigate, my project is due in less than a week.
    The good news is that I've realized that that there's a white object in the bg of the shot the entire time that is pure white so i could color correct by setting that as the white point in FCP. The only problem is that since it shifts every 3 seconds or so i would have to keyframe a LOT. Is there any plug-in or application that will let me track that white object in the background so it can set a custom white points for every frame?
    Running Final Cut Pro 6.0.2
    PS: I found Avid has auto color correction -- basically what I'm looking for I guess. Unfortunately I don't have Avid.

    there's no auto color correction feature directly in FCP
    there are 3rd party plugs to allow you to track objects but i'm not aware of any way to link that to a color correction

  • Sunrise/Sunset and White Balance

    I have a question about overriding Automatic White Balance when photographing sunrises and sunsets. A few days ago, I got my first DSLR, an EOS 5D Mk III. I know the ISO triangle after shooting film on my Canon A-1 that I bought 34 years ago, which still works). However, this white balance thing is a fourth dimension. Films are balanced for daylight and the ISO is also dictated. For photographing a sunrise or sunset, to me, it makes sense to set the white balance to 5200 Kelvin (daylight). I got one response from a camera club member who said his photos were all in the 5000 range. Others have said "Shoot in RAW and fix it in post processing". The second response of "Fix it later" just doesn't ring my bell. What about getting it right the first time? Should I set white balance to daylight or some other setting? I can always experiment with changing white balance; after all, I'm not wasting film. Below are a series of sunrises that I took using Kodak Portra 400, -2/3 stop, on my Canon A-1. http://www.flickr.com/photos/ralphhightower/sets/72157633079358301/ Thanks, Ralph
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    It might be helpful to just think of the digital camera's white balance capabilities as a built-in and very complete set of color conversion and color correction filters, such as we used to use with film. Now, for your convenience, all those filters are right there, inside the camera.... much easier to carry around and use!
    If shooting during Golden Hours, the camera's Automatic White Balance (AWB) can tend to overcorrect and remove some of the lovely golden nature of the light. One solution is as others have recommended, to shoot RAW and make your adjustments later. This is no different from making the adjustments in-camera, at the time of exposure, and can make for much greater control and precision. It's not really a "fix it later" thing... It is more a matter of doing fine-tuning and optimizing the image (more on this below). RAW simply retains all the data from the original capture and is a good thing to use, anyway. 
    All digital cameras essentially capture a TIFF image file with a lot of proprietary data attached and an embedded "preview/review" JPEG... that's what the RAW file is. If you make JPEGs in-camera, a lot of data is thrown away, following the directions laid out by the settings in the camera. If, instead, you save the entire RAW file, you can change those directions later in post-processing... or just make a JPEG from the image "as shot", using the exact same set of instructions as were set in the camera at the time of exposure. One of the beauties of RAW is that so long as you store the original image file, you can always go back and re-process it another way, if you wish. This is particularly helpful when new to digital and uncertain about your settings. Something you might want to do is shoot RAW+JPEG initially. That way you have both the full data stored, along with the potential to make changes if you wish, plus the JPEG produced according to your camera settings. The JPEG can serve as a post-processing learning tool, using it as a point of comparison with your own RAW file conversions.... and as feedback about your camera settings. (Don't trust the image display on the camera's LCD screen... it's not calibrated and is too subject to ambient light variations. The histogram display is generally more informative, but even that is subject to the camera's settings, since it's done from the embedded JPEG and not directly from the full RAW file.) 
    But, I agree, it's also good to "get it right the first time". Or at least come as close as possible.
    The most ideal way to do that would be to set a Custom White Balance for every shot. Use a standardized target, bathed in the same light as your subject/scene, and take a shot of it... then tell the camera to use that as reference. However, it's just not practical to do that.
    Nor is it a good idea to set one particular color temp and use it for everything (i know photogs who do that and have had to work with their images.... it makes for a lot of extra work!)
    Thus there are all the "presets" you can choose among, looking for one that's most appropriate for your particular situation... And there is AWB, which allows the camera to try to choose for you. Outdoors in daylight I've found Canon AWB to be pretty darned good. Shots in the shade can be a little overly cool. And indoor shots with tungsten or other artifical light are when a Custom WB is most likely to be needed.... especially with weird, uncalibrated lighting such as sodium vapor and mercury vapor lamps.
    To set an accurate Custom WB, get yourself a gray card or similar (I use Lastolite EZ Balance targets, which are sort of like a foldable/flexible gray card). This also can be helpful arriving at an accurately metered exposures. Something else I use in certain circumstances are Warm Cards... these have slight tints that "fool" the camera into slightly tinting the image.... a light blue/cyan target will cause the camera to render a slightly warm color balance. Warm Cards would be particularly helpful shooting during the Golden Hours, if wanting to retain some of the warmth of the light at those times of day.  It's more accurate doing this than simply manually setting a particular color temp, although that's possible too. 
    And, yes, you should spend some time getting to know how your camera handles color. Each model can be a bit different. You'd do well to shoot a bunch of test shots with AWB, Custom WB and, if you wish, the various presets... to see how they perform.
    Of course, you don't always have time to think about or make settings... sometimes to catch fleeting light you have to run to catch an image quickly, shoot RAW and "fix it later" in post-processing!
    If you haven't already done so, you might want to calibrate your computer monitor. As concerned as you are about rendering accurate color or manipulating it the way you want it, in case you are unaware of it... your computer monitor is lying to you. All computer monitors are different, none are really very accurate and virtually all are way too bright. If you make prints using an uncalibrated monitor, you will usually find them coming out too dark. This is because an overly bright monitor causes you to adjust the image too dark. If you don't already have them, you might want to get computer calibration software and hardware and use them regularly (about once every month or two, usually... monitors change over time and with use). 
    The way the calibration device works is by first running a test on your particular monitor, and then providing a profile that the computer will use when rendering images on the display. Some of the more sophisticated calibration suites can also be used to develop printing profiles (unique for each ink/paper/printer combination), projectors and other viewing devices. (I use a Datacolor Spyder, one of several different calibration devices/softwares available).
    Hope this helps!
    Alan Myers
    San Jose, Calif., USA
    "Walk softly and carry a big lens."
    GEAR: 5DII, 7D(x2), 50D(x3), some other cameras, various lenses & accessories
    FLICKR & PRINTROOM 

  • DNG Profile editor and white balance

    I am very happy to see the practical realization of the extentions announced in the DNG 1.2 specification. This is a great step forward to achieve wide acceptance of DNG.
    While reading the User's Guide, I found following statement (in the Tutorial 1):
    >3. (Optional) If the image is not already white-balanced, you can perform a click-WB using a context click
    Why would one white balance here? What effect does that have on the result? The profile describes, which HSV will be converted in which HSV; this has nothing to do with the WB of a particular image.

    The WB feature in the DNG Profile Editor (PE) is there because it is possible that you might open a DNG file in PE that has not already been white balanced. Imagine you photographed an image under tungsten lighting but had the in-camera WB manually set to daylight. If you didn't set the WB before converting the image to a DNG, it will appear very warm when you open it up in PE. So PE's WB feature is designed to save you time by letting you do a click-WB instead of having to go back to CR or LR to adjust the image's WB.
    PE is named "profile editor" because it only edits profiles. It is not an image editor. So you are correct, you do not really need an image to edit profiles, technically. However, unless you have an image open you have no way to evaluate how good your adjustments are.
    Typically the only reason to make a profile or edit a profile is if there's something about an existing profile that you're unhappy with. And you'd be unhappy because you'd have an example of a "problem" image, where the existing profile doesn't produce the result you want. That's the image you want to bring into the PE, so you can pick out the colors that are "wrong" and fix them.
    Then ideally you would open many more images in PE just to verify that your adjustments generalize well.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How can I get rid of a phantom blank CD appearing in Finder?

    OK, so I'm having trouble with the CD-DVD superdrive in my MacBook pro. I can't get it to reliably detect a disk and work with it. Copied a Granddaughter's birthday disk mix that I wanted to make copies of for her cousins. Had a heck of a time gettin

  • FlashPlayer v. 10.1.102.64: Green flickering/essentially stopped working

    My data at the bottom. I never had issues with Flashplayer (e.g., I also run the entire CS4 suite w/o issue). After the newest, suggested upgrade (chosen after it was automatically offered) to the most recent version (see subject line), I notice on y

  • No signal while playing flash games

    Hi, i need help with a problem. Everytime i play a flash game (casino) on my pc my monitor goes black en i see the message 'no signal'. My computer is still on but doesn't respond to anything. Even on/off doesn't work. I have to pull the plug and res

  • How does Time Machine track changes?

    My Leopard upgrade got stuck with a minute to go - I had to hold down the power button to restart my Mac, but to my surprise Leopard launched and everything seemed to work fine. I set up Time Machine and it's been running without problems, backing up

  • Aggregation Level & Selection ID in Demand Planing Background job

    Folks Whle creating a Demand Planning job in the background, we need to make few selection such as             1. Choosing a Selection ID(One, Several & Select All) and             2. Choosing an Aggregation level. My question is : Doesn't the select