Color Clipping 5D footage to Broadcast Safe

I’m correcting a short, part was shot with a Canon 5dMarkII, the other with an HVX200.  I've turned Broadcast Safe off in the Project Settings as I like to see all of the info when correcting.  The footage from theHVX200 is normal, but when I try to manipulate the 5D footage, Color acts as if the broadcast safety is on and clips the footage at the 100 and 0 values.   Thoughts?  Thanks!

I cut a couple of shorts last year that were shot with the same combo of cameras. In my case, the HVX was shooting 10-bit (4:2:2) footage while the Canon only shoots 8-bit (4:2:0)  The difference shows up as a lack of dynamic range that gets worse if the 5D is shot at default still settings.
I'm not saying it's your problem too, just consider the possibility.
Good luck!

Similar Messages

  • Color scopes and Broadcast safe

    In the process of experimenting, I have sent 100% bars ( 8 bit Uncompressed PAL) from FCP to Color. The first thing I noticed is that when ‘broadcast safe’is enabled, it clamps the signal quite harshly especially round the mids area. The waveform monitor (and an external Techtronix 601 A Scope) confirms this with the luminance levels of Magenta and green being almost identical. Same result when clip is imported rather than 'Send to'
    The weird thing is that when I disable broadcast safe, this restores the bars to how they should look and the external scope displays correctly but the internal scope in still incorrect.
    Why is 'broadcast safe' having such an affect on Bars and why are the on board scopes vastly different to external scopes? Any insight greatly appreciated.
    Color 1.0.2
    BM Extreme
    Mac Pro 2.66 10.4.11

    The answer might be in your post.
    You say you sent "100% bars". If this means 100% saturation, Broadcast spec is 75%, at least in good old NTSC. Just don't start it... that's what SMPTE sez, I didn't make up the rules.
    And COLOR's "broadcast safe" will chainsaw the image at whatever you set it to in the "Broadcast Safe" settings dialog. I pine for the good old days of the Hewlett Packard QA103, which rolled off quite nicely, but that product is no longer manufactured and was SD.
    Your external scopes are probably calibrated to 75%? I'm puzzled, though by your observation that it is clipping/compressing the "mids"? Do you mean the middle of the screen geometry-wise, or the middle of the waveform, ie around the 50 IRE level? How would it do that? I'd be interested in what its doing to yellow, which should be the highest luminance bar.
    The other thing is that Color Bars do contain levels that are considered outside broadcast safe in RGB, but not in YCbCr, and this may be another contributing factor.
    jPo

  • Does the Broadcast Colors filter work?  How to get a broadcast safe production?

    Hey guys ~
    Have searched around a bit but haven't found much info on this subject.  One of my films just signed a distribution deal (go team) and I've been in the process of submitting my deliverables.  The company I've been assigned to for QC uses FCP7 for their preliminary check, and if that passes they send it on to a more rigorous test to ensure legal broadcast levels. 
    I'd like to keep everything in PP, but here's the deal.  I export my film with PP CC to a ProRes HQ file using the "Broadcast Colors" filter set to an IRE of 99 (just to be a touch on the safe side).  I was happy because I thought the final product looked even better and retained even more information than the Broadcast Safe filter in FCP. Only the catch is, when I import the final product from PP into FCP7 to see the results that they are going to see, there is a consistent "red" warning on contrasty shots... some are totally outside of the FCP7 broadcast safe scopes.
    I've succumbed to jumping back to FCP7 to do the final on this just to make sure it will pass inspection, but I'm curious if anyone has had any experience with this? What's the correct way that I'm missing to use PP CC to make sure that you have a finished product that is safe to put on the airwaves?  Is the PP CC Broadcast Safe filter reliable for professional delivery specifications?
    Thanks in advance for any help...

    Is the PP CC Broadcast Safe filter reliable for professional delivery specifications?
    I dont think it is flexible enough and never use it.
    Simplest way is to apply Premiere 'Levels' effect.
    You will note an "automatic" level clip at 100% and then its easy to set White RGB Out at say 250 and fix any Color Channel Luminance issue..the same way.
    Then of course..Blacks.
    FWIW - I use an Adjustment Layer to do this usually across the entire sequence

  • Can you make a clip "broadcast safe" within Compressor

    Hello, I've had a bunch of QT clips I exported to Mpeg files using Compressor. When watching them on a television the bright whites are causing audio buzz. I can take them into Final Cut and apply the Broadcast Safe or Color Safe filter to fix that, but is there a way to apply the same effect in Compressor to save time?

    Sorry. Compressor doesn't have that filter.

  • Broadcast safe destroys my HDV clip??

    I am color correcting a feature shot on HDV and came to a clip that looked really bad finally turned off broadcast safe and the clip looks fine. Anyone know of a solution? I will need this project to be broadcast safe.
    Thanks, Mark

    Not to disagree at any level, but I find I use the Broadcast safe checkbox as a rule - just to provide a safety clamp that obviates the need to use our HD legalizer, which I think is a bit noisy. Of course it's not a grading tool as such - the whites always need to be assessed and levelled - but it means I can drive them a bit harder on occasion knowing I won't overshoot. The effect on a properly graded image should be imperceptible.
    If on the other hand, an unclipped image "looks right", and a "safe" image looks horribly clipped, it's a sure sign that monitoring etc is going all the way to IRE109 - a very bad look.

  • Video filters became disabled. video in timeline reverted back to glowing images. Broadcast safe button does nothing.  Black and white went back to color.  what happened to my video filters?

    video filters became disabled.  My timeline now shows video in pre-broadcast safe look.  black and white video went back to original color.  video filters not responding at all.  what happened?

    First thing to do is reset your fcp preferences
    https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-2491
    Have you done any software updates or installed any new software recently?
    What format are your sources and what are your sequence settings?
    Here are some other troubleshooting tips
    https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-2591

  • Broadcast safe now only works when clips are nested?

    Am I crazy or is this true? Just started working on FCP 7.0.2....
    Dropped a broadcast safe on a clip. The excess luma still shows in the video scopes. Nested the clip, dropped the broadcast safe on it, now all seems to be fine.
    Is this new behavior in 7.0? or, am I insane / imagining things?
    Thanks

    Strange but true Mark, just tested and see the same behavior here ... I don't generally use the BS filter myself as I've never found its corrections suitable for the specs I need to adhere too (I prefer to legalise manually) so never noticed this before. Odd find.

  • Broadcast safe blacks and whites - Premiere CS4 - How to get?

    Hi. I recently had a fellow editor over and he saw some of my footage and mentioned that my whites were too bright and to make sure that they were broadcast safe before exporting them. He didn't know how to do it in Premiere as he uses Final Cut. He said that Final Cut does it automatically. Does Premiere Pro do it Automatically?
    After mentionng it to me, I did notice that my whites were quite bright. Below are some examples.
    These are two frames taken from the timeline of a sequnce which had already been exported as an AVI.
    Here is some information about the system I use:
    Once I found out how to do it, is there a way I could quickly apply this to a whole sequence of clips? Do i need to play around with it for each individual clip?

    yes, the tv and computer monitor will look different...probably why you thought the whites were OK when editing on computer.
    I use CS3 so your version may be slightly different ....
    im gonna put up some images to illustrate...
    you can use broadcast colors (effect )...drag onto clip ...and see if that works OK for you ...
    export a small sample of product ( shrink work area to do small sample ), burn dvd and look on TV...only way to see if its working...can use dvd RW if you want and your dvd player can play dvd rw.
    if broadcast colors doesnt work well for you, you can also use the OUTPUT on levels...which is normally 0 and 255...black and white...
    after you click "OK" on the levels menu you see in sample is when you see change in program monitor...( in my version cs3 )..you wont see change until you click OK, except for in the little tiny window of the levels box....
    I personally use the levels adjustment (output only ) more often than the broadcast safe colors for WHITES...

  • Gopro mp4 to prores gets clamped to broadcast safe :-(

    I am trying to find the best way to convert footage from my gopro camera to prores. I seem to have stumbled across  nastiness.
    Gopro footage : 1080p 25fps
    Using Prores 1080p 25fps (not proxy, LT etc)
    I have tried converting my in compressor. I have also tried rendering the mp4 in fcp 7 and exporting a self contained version prores version for fcp 7. I have tried using compressor 4 (also installed) and moeg streamclip. When I look at the resulting prores video using scopes in either fcp or color it looks like the footage has been clamped to the broadcast safe values. Where pointy peaks should be, there are flat dense lines at the broadcast safe values. Pulling back the highs in a three way color correction revels a reduction in detail, particularly notable in the highlight areas
    Through much trial and error, I have discovered that if I convert to prores using the ancient QuickTime 7 app there is no "clamping" and there is significant detail retained in the highlight areas (and darks too). This allows me room to color correct to better result.
    It seems qt7 is only thing that will do the conversion accurately.
    I have double checked as much as I can. In color for example I do not have "broadcast safe" switched on. It has made me doubt my process and I feel I have gone through fcp and compressor (and mpeg stream clip) as much as I can looking for some sort of similar "broadcast safe" switch.
    I obviously don't want to loose highlight info at such an early stage of the workflow.
    As far as I can tell, it does not happen when converting to gopro's CineForm codec and highlight detail beyond the legal broadcast level  is retained.
    I would love to hear that I am missing something about this or doing something wrong!
    MacPro 4x dual core
    Mountain lion (latest updates)
    Note: I have fcp x installed but I am not using this for this job.

    Interesting stuff Zebulun.
    Something is not right.
    Using FCP X to view gopro mp4 at either 720p and 1080p at 25fps shows there is no clamping. FCP X seems to be the boss at handling these files. Ive tested this with the new Go Pro Protune codec (which makes a huge quality difference by the way) as well.
    Mpeg Streamclip does indeed seem to do a decent job with 720p. I see no difference between the pro res file from this app and the raw mp4 in FCP X - or a prores converted in FCP X.
    Its not quite the case for 1080p though. The version from MPeg stream clip is not exactly clamped but the range seems reduced compared to the efforts made by FCP X.
    I don't know what is at the root of all this. I don't think the gopro is clamping anything as it all seems as expected in FCP X. I guess it might be writing dodgy files that confuse other software.
    What I feel confident about is that FCP X handles the raw camera footage very well indeed. Even if I end up sticking to FCP 7 for some time I shall be converting Gopro in FCP X.

  • 'Broadcast Safe' & Timelines

    I am thinking about switching to FCP Express, but concerned that it does not have WaveForm and Vectorscope monitors for uploading footage. The manual says the 'Broadcast Safe' filter will adjust the signals to television legal limits. What is your experience using this filter and did it pass television standards.
    And, what is your opinion about all the other 'color correction' capabilities of FCPEx, and how does it measure against FCP.
    Also, I usually have opened several Timelines during each project session, working out the sequences. Can I do this with FCPEx?
    You can tell I've never worked on FCP; have been a Media 100 person since the 1990's.
    Thanks so much.
    Bill

    In FCE there is no Waveform nor Vectorscope monitor, but you can watch the audio waveforms in the timeline or in the viewer for a specific clip.
    You can open and work on many sequences in the timeline; you can also nest them for further editing possibilities.
    I cannot answer about the broadcast safe filter I never used, nor about the color correction. It depends what you actually need: FCE has a 2-way corrector while FCP has a 3-way corrector. I'm perfectly happy with the 2-way corrector but you might find it a limiting factor, depending on your expectations.
    Piero

  • Is "Broadcast Safe" necessary if the output will never be broadcast?

    I'm doing a project whose final output will be a set of DVD's which will never be broadcast. I really like the color look I've achieved for my clips, but when I check my scopes, they're outside broadcast safe, both up and down. If the output will never be broadcast, do I need to adjust these for broadcast safe?
    Also, to get the best for the output, which settings for YUV, etc. should I use to have the DVD's match what I'm seeing in FCP?
    Just a bit of additional information, I'm making the assumption that most if not all of the ultimate viewers of the project will be viewing it on modern HD sets. Does that also make a difference to my final output settings?
    Thanks.

    You must view FCP's output on a calibrated, professional broadcast monitor to assess the "look".
    Computer monitors do not provide a true indication of how your movie will appear on a consumer television.
    Try to find two consumer televisions that are accurately and identically adjusted. It is very unlikely.
    While there is some degree of tolerance and there's not much chance of you blowing up someone's TV these days, you should at least use the "Normal" settings in the broadcast safe filter.
    As an example. whites and yellows that are too bright can "crossover" and cause an annoying buzzing sound in the audio as well as being unpleasant to look at.

  • How to adjust broadcast safe filters correctly (Filter currently compromises picture)

    Hi guys,
    Can anyone explain to me how to use the Broadcast Color filter properly?  Before, when I was using FCP7, I just slapped on the Broadcast Safe filter and the edits passes the QC every time.  Now we've moved to Premiere Pro CC and I added the filter twice, once to set the luma and once to set the saturation (both default at 110).  The problem is that it completely changes the picture.  I get banding and the colour is noticeably clamped.  I've been working a lot with animations recently, so dealing with a lot of super saturated and bright colours.  If I set the broadcast filter to both 120 on luma and saturation, it doesn't look too bad.  Does anyone know at what number in the broadcast safe filter, will the become colour become not safe?  Can I get away with 120 on the luma and sat?  Please see images below: 

    I never use that BC Filter!
    Test showed me its un reliable and it degrades the image.  Basically it uses a "keying" type approach and this can leave some very nasty visual remnants ( patches).
    I use the traditional method of working with scopes ( Luma and RGB Parades) and levels  ( Levels Effect)  and processing in various CC Tools.
    To legalise color I work on the individual chroma ( RGB Channels).  Red is usually the culprit that needs fixing.
    The Levels Effect will automatically clip Luma.  I generally drop Whites to 95-98 to be safe.
    Unfortunately in PPro or Speedgrade...there is no soft clipping available . THere is in Resolve.

  • Broadcast safe filter problems... help

    Hi so I have been up all night trying to work out how to keep my luma and chroma levels in CS6 within broadcast safe for a TVC.
    At first all looks fine, apply a broadcast safe filter and presto waveform drops to within safe levels,...but once you render... back to square one.
    See screenshot below, broadcast safe filter applied but waveform monitor still gives me above legal levels of 100 IRE???
    Any idea's? This needs to be on air this week!

    Interesting.
    Right now I'm exporting footage using the broadcast filter applied to an adjustment layer.  So, while all the tracks below have their own effects, I placed an adjustment layer over the top over everything (track 5 as it happens) and applied the broadcast safe filter to that. 
    I have no idea what order thiswill get applied, but it's probably worth trying and see if it helps....
    It's one way of making the entire show broadcast safe without having to apply it to every clip individualy.

  • Broadcast safe levels and DVD output

    Some of my video levels are above 100 IRE. I am only outputting to DVD or Blu-ray, never broadcast.
    Should I compress the dynamic range down to broadcast safe, or leave the slightly higher dynamic range?
    I think that this is probably a question of how FCP, Compressor, and the DVD or Blu-ray plays handle 110 IRE. All the video I am referring to is HDV and the over 100 IRE is in the original captured video. I understand that I need to set the RGB to YCbCr conversion in the sequence settings to match my output strategy.
    All my sequence renders are to ProRes.
    Obviously, if I use 110 IRE as my max output level, I don't what it clipped somewhere down the path.
    Thanks
    Rick

    IRE is an analogue video measurement. It is only applicable if you are transferring to analogue:
    http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/video_levelsnattress.html
    8-bit digital video uses a level of 16 for 0% and 235 for 100%.
    So you are talking about levels that are above 100%, a.k.a. superwhites.
    Since ProRes is 10-bit, the digital code numbers are different,
    but superwhites are still luma values that are above 100%.
    Although DV-type codecs can handle superwhites, DVD encoding does not,
    so it would be safest to eliminate them by using the Broadcast Safe filter
    set to 100%, even though you're not broadcasting.
    Clamping your superwhites may cause you to lose highlight detail.
    For that reason, you should color-correct to bring the highlights
    down to below 100% (while looking at the Waveform Monitor)
    and then use the Broadcast Safe filter as insurance.
    That way, you can determine how you'd like the highlights to look,
    instead of just letting them get all set to 100%.
    If you're doing a lot of color-correction, the extra resolution
    will be useful. Just be sure to get things below 100% for output to DVD.

  • Broadcast Safe warnings

    Hello All,
    are there out of Broadcast safe warnings in AE?
    I started doing some color correction and I don't want to end up with colors that are not safe
    Thanks

    If you apply the Broadcast Colors effect (Effect > Color Correction > Broadcast Colors), you'll see it has two visulization options called "key unsafe" and "key safe". As the names suggest, these options will show out of range colors only or safe colors only. If you apply it to an Adjustment Layer at the top of the layer stack, it will do so for all layers in your Comp. Bear in mind that these two are visualization options, they don't legalize colors (for that you have the other options in the same effect). However, the Broadcast Color effect does not take luminance ranges into account, so you could use Color Management, or complement the Broadcast Colors effect with an instance of Levels in which Output black is set to 16 and Output white is set to 235.
    The thing with Color Management is that there are values which are part of the NTSC, PAL or REC.709 (ie, HDTV) color spaces, but are still illegal because of luminance/channel values. On the other hand, if you use a color space that clips those values to legal ones when processing, it could produce bad results. So the right workflow would be: use SDTV PAL or SDTV NTSC as project working space, and then use SDTV PAL 16-235 or SDTV NTSC 16-235 as output profile, in the Color Management tab in the Output Module. This way, you'd use the full PAL or NTSC color spaces for rendering and legalize the output for the rendered file. Works beautifully. No need to use Levels or the Broadcast Colors effect to legalize color/luminance values.

Maybe you are looking for

  • I've Made the Switch (from iWeb) & Lived to Tell About It.

    I've gotten a lot of help and useful information from this forum over the years and I will certainly miss it. I've just completed a 2 month transition where I've migrated my site from iWeb/Mobile Me to a new site made in RapidWeaver and hosted by Hos

  • Using order by and rownum in massive tables

    Hi, I need to retreive paginated and ordered data from a big table. I know some different tips using rownum or the RANK() function and subqueries, these tips work well for small amount of data, but I need to get the data from a table with 200.000 ent

  • Applications Report Error

    Hi, There is an SQL Plus Report which was developed by someone else a few years ago. And now i pulled the code to make a few changes in the columns and put it back. Before i made the change i ran the report from the Oracle applications and there was

  • Issue in scheduling transaction MEMASSPO.

    My task is to set the delivery complete indicator in the purchase order line items. I can save a variant for the transaction, but how to select the fields in the variant. Do you have any idea. Thanks, Seshadri

  • Mounting a second IDE disk

    My Solaris 8 x86 system has two disks. The second disk appears fine. when I fdisk it allows me to configure the second disk as a full unix type partition. However when I try to mount: #mount -F ufs /dev/dsk/c1d0p0 /space I get the message: #mount: /d