Color Management on images in iweb

I am using iweb for a blog page and the image preview on my intro page is completely different from the entries page. Same image imported for both . . . the main page shows a "summary" of the blog entry with a picture and when you enter the page of the entry the image completely changes color.
Is there a color setting anywhere? Why would it change?
These are the pages . . . the skin is very different from page to page.
Thanks!
http://web.me.com/rinkphoto/Rink/Journal/Journal.html
http://web.me.com/rinkphoto/Rink/Journal/Entries/2009/8/1Xmas_in_AugustSale!.html

sorry for bad answer what I mean is click on your photo and click adjust
also please visit my website lukew.tk

Similar Messages

Color Management: Light image shows correct in Photoshop, but not in Illustrator

Have a light cyan (13% dot max gradient piping the text) emboss letters spot channel .psd placed in AI. In Photoshop the image shows up great, but in Illustrator is notvisible (goes to white).
Color profile is good & generated with hardware device i1Profiler
Same color settings in both AI & PS- North Amercian General Purpose in both
Assign profile tried both Working CMYK US WEB v2 & don't color manage
Illustrator (left) Photoshop (right)

Figured it out. Happening because this is spot channel. For my purpose am creating a renders of a package, so converted the spot channel to CMYK.
Illustrator for as long as I can remeber has nto worked perfectly with spot chanels, the colros are off in Illustraor, and when you print a fiery they are off. Only solution I found to keep a spot cahnel intack, is to add a dummy white channel in the layers palette for the sahpe of the spot channel. While this works great with spot chanenls that are built without tints, nto so well in a cse liek the one above.
Kow I am not the only one to have discovered the dummy white trick, as printers such as SGS are using this. Can anyone offer any more insight into why we have to use a dummy white layers, and how to keep a spot channel intack on files like this one with the light tinted gradation???

Color management and images uploaded to the web

Hi,
I use Photoshop on both a mac pro (OS 10.5) and a PC (Vista) and when I upload photos to the web, the images processed on my PC look just fine, but the images I process on my Mac look washed out and pale on the web. The funny thing is the Mac images look GREAT on the Mac, but washed out on the PC. Is there some color profile or calibration that I need to be doing? Please help!

can I re-open/expand this one? I don't think it is quite this simple
at present I perform a similar manual operation having set up a series of calibrations using the system prefs>displays>colour in different light and including gamma 2.2 version
I use Nikon Capture NX2 for my photographic editing, but as you may not be familiar with it, it is serious software (dare I say here orders-of-magnitude better and more extensive than Aperture) and works on RAW (nef) files. I post on a number of equally serious web photo-forums posting at near professional level. There is a constant trickle of EITHER complaints about 'too dark' from PC users OR about colour, but am not concerned with that here.
I tried out the suggestion of working at gamma 2.2 myself and found I had to adjust a good image by +0.67 EV to get back to normal. That is unacceptable and hate to think how results would print.
So 10.6 is about to go to gamma 2.2 as normal, but what effect will that have on previous work done with 1.8, ie will the system correct everything by itself (or do we need to reach heaven first)?
The more immediate effect of 10.6 will be that Nikon and others will probably take another 6 months to make their software compatible

Color management tech specs

Do they have any color management and image quality advice anywhere
for the new books?
I already know how I would set them up, just would like to see something from Apple.

Tom:
Here's what Apple sent me when I asked them about book media quality:
I contacted Apple and asked for information that I could pass on. Here's the reply I received from Apple:
"Thank you for contacting the Apple Print Products Customer Service.
I understand that you would like to know the printing process that is used and the color mode the files should be in, so you can better advise users in the iPhoto forum.
iPhoto version 4 or later, allows you to import and print files through the Apple Print Product service as RGB, grayscale, or CMYK color space. JPEG files with RGB color space are recommended for best results.
While iPhoto 2 can import files of various formats, including RGB color, grayscale, and CMYK, this version requires JPEG files with RGB color space when printing photos and books.
For more information regarding iPhoto 2, please visit the following article:
iPhoto: Color, Black and White Prints Appear Garbled or Distorted
For more information regarding iPhoto 5, please visit the following article:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=165501
Here are some of the technical specifications for the books, cards, and calendars. I hope this gives you an idea about their quality and form.
BOOKS
All iPhoto books are printed using acid-free paper for long-lasting image quality. The photos are printed at a high resolution (300DPI if you use iPhoto 6). There is no external modification--such as sharpening or contrast adjustment--of the photos; what you see in the application is what is printed in the book.
Hardcovers Books
The cover is hard-bound and covered in linen. You select the linen color during the book-ordering process. The hardcover books have a solid, stiff binding that is glued and crimped. The internal pages, measuring 8.5 x 11 inches, are printed on McCoy 100# Text Gloss paper stock.
Softcover Books
The softcover books come in three sizes:
- Large 8.5 x 11 inches
- Medium 6 x 8 inches
- Small 2.6 x 3.5 inches
All of the softcover books have internal pages that are printed on McCoy 100# Text Gloss paper stock. The large softcover book has a white cover (Kromekoteplus Folding Cover, 16 point) with a cutout on the front that reveals the cover-page photo in the book. The covers for the medium and small softcover books have the cover image and title printed directly on the cover. All of the softcover books have a glued binding and feature a thick cover of McCoy 100# Cover Gloss paper stock.
CARDS
All cards are printed on McCoy 120# Silk Cover paper stock. The postcards measure 4 x 6 inches, and the greeting cards measure 5 x 7inches.
CALENDARS
All calendars measure 8 x 10 inches and are printed on McCoy 100# Silk Cover paper stock.
To ensure the best print quality, we have chosen to use Kodak NexPress technology. The press uses a dry toner, which is fused to the surface of the paper. Please see NexPress' site for more information:
KODAK NEXPRESS 2500 Digital Production Color Press
I hope you find this information helpful in answering questions on the iPhoto forum."
Do you Twango?
TIP: For insurance against the iPhoto database corruption that many users have experienced I recommend making a backup copy of the Library6.iPhoto database file and keep it current. If problems crop up where iPhoto suddenly can't see any photos or thinks there are no photos in the library, replacing the working Library6.iPhoto file with the backup will often get the library back. By keeping it current I mean backup after each import and/or any serious editing or work on books, slideshows, calendars, cards, etc. That insures that if a problem pops up and you do need to replace the database file, you'll retain all those efforts. It doesn't take long to make the backup and it's good insurance.
I've written an Automator workflow application (requires Tiger), iPhoto dB File Backup, that will copy the selected Library6.iPhoto file from your iPhoto Library folder to the Pictures folder, replacing any previous version of it. It's compatible with iPhoto 08 libraries. You can download it at Toad's Cellar. Be sure to read the Read Me pdf file.

Keynote and Color Management

Does anyone know whether Keynote uses color management? I am using the program to project images of famous artwork for educational purposes and want to make sure that the images look the same as they did when edited in Photoshop. If there are color settings to choose from, where would they be found?
thanks in advance for any wisdom

According to my own testing on Keynote '08, the answer is yes. Images in Keynote are the same as in Safari, which is color managed. Images are different in QuickTime, which is not color managed. I also would like to see definitive answer, though.

Printing, Soft Proofing & Color Management in LR 1.2: Two Questions

Printing, Soft Proofing, and Color Management in LR 1.2: Two Questions
There are 2 common ways to set color management in Adobe CS2:
1. use managed by printer setting or,
2. use managed by Adobe CS2 program.
I want to ask how Color Management for Adobe LR 1.2 differs from that in CS2?
As is well known, Color Management by printer requires accurate printer profiles including specific model printer, types of ink and specific paper. It is clear that this seems to work well for LR 1.2 when using the Printer module.
Now lets consider what happens one tries to use Color Management by Adobe LR 1.2. Again, as is well known, Color Management by printer must be turned off so that only one Color Management system is used. It has been my experience that LR 1.2 cant Color Manage my images correctly. Perhaps someone with more experience can state whether this is true or what I might be doing to invalidate LR 1.2 Color Management.
Specifically, I cant use Soft Proofing to see how my images are changed on my monitor when I try to use the edit functions in LR 1.2. Martin Evening states in his text, The Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Book that it is not possible to display the results of the rendered choices (Perceptual or Relative) on the display monitor. While it is not clear in Evenings text if this applies to LR 1.2, my experience would suggest that it still applies to the 1.2 update even though the publication date of his book preceded this update.
Can someone with specific knowledge of Adobe LR 1.2 confirm that Color Management and Soft Proofing with LR 1.2 hasnt been implemented at the present.
The writer is a retired physicist with experience in laser physics and quantum optics.
Thanks,
Hersch Pilloff

Hersch,
since just like me, you're a physicist (I am just a little further from retirement ;) ) I'll explain a little further. computer screens (whether they are CRT or LCD) are based on emission (or transmission) of three colors of light in specific (but different for every screen) shades of red, green, and blue. This light stimulates the receptors in your eye which are sensitive to certain but different bands of red, green and blue as the display emits, making your brain think it sees a certain color instead of a mix of red green and blue. Printers however, produce color by modifying the reflection of the paper by absorbing light. Their color mixing operates completely differently than displays. When you throw all colors of ink on the paper, you get black (the mixing is said to be subtractive) instead of white as you get in displays (the mixing there is additive). The consequence of this is that in the absence of an infinite number of inks you cannot produce all the colors you can display on a monitor using a printer and vice versa. This can be easily seen if you compare a display's profile to a printer profile in a program such as Colorsync utility (on every mac) or
Gamut vision. Typically printers cannot reproduce a very large region in the blue but most displays on the other hand cannot make saturated yellows and cyans.
Here is a flattened XY diagram of a few color spaces and a typical printer profile to illustrate this. Most displays are close to sRGB, but some expensive ones are close to adobeRGB, making the possible difference between print and screen even worse.
So, when the conversion to the printer's profile is made from your source file (which in Lightroom is in a variant of prophotoRGB), for a lot of colors, the color management routine in the computer software has to make an approximation (the choice of perceptual and relative colorimetric determine what sort of approximation is made). Soft proofing allows you to see the result of this approximation and to correct specific problems with it.

Color Management, (Again!)

I know this has been discussed before, but I still haven't found anything that can help me solve the issue. It's starting to become a serious barrier to professional work, so any thoughts woudl be appreciated.
I have both the eye1Display2 and a Gretag-Macbeth color checker and regularly calibrate my monitor and camera profiles. I'm working with CS5. The colors in Photoshop are consistently far off from every other applicaiton outside of it. Even Flickr. I assume this is because of the color management, but I've even turned that off, (which gives me a warning message now every time I bring in an image), and the issue still occurs. Worse, the colors displayed working with RAW images are now different to those in the main interface, and even then, they are NOT the same outside of Photoshop, whereas all the other packages are consistent. My workaround right now is to save regularly and check in other packages but this is simply not good enough for adjusting curves, HSL, etc. I do a lot of work with skintones, which are particularly color-critical.
So my quesions are - how can I turn Photoshop's color management completely off so it's not applying any lookup at all to the color in any module?
If I WANT it to apply the color profile from the i1Display and the X-Rite Color Checker Passport sofware, how can I know this is being done and carried through from the RAW processing to the rest of the package?
Many thanks
Albert Hastings

ahast42696 wrote:
I have both the eye1Display2 and a Gretag-Macbeth color checker and regularly calibrate my monitor and camera profiles. I'm working with CS5. The colors in Photoshop are consistently far off from every other applicaiton outside of it.
If what you're saying here is that a fully color-managed application, like Photoshop, is delivering color that's different from non-color-managed applications, this is just what you should expect.
There is no such thing as system-wide color management. It just doesn't work that way. Individual applications do (or don't do, or even partially do) color-management.
This is key:
Color-managed applications perform transforms on the colors being displayed in pursuit of absolute color accuracy at the expense of consistency with non-color-managed applications.
Corrollary:
Some color-managed applications misinterpret some color profiles. It happens.
Expanding on what Dag has said in post #1 above, no transform takes place if the document profile matches the display profile.
So... IF you're working with documents in the sRGB IEC61966-2.1 color space (aka just "sRGB" for the purpose of this discussion) and IF you want the display of these images to match as often as possible between color-managed applciations and non-color-managed applications, this is one possible direction you can take:
1. Set your system to associate the system-provided sRGB profile with your monitor(s). This is done via OS configuration dialogs.
2. Set your monitor(s) to as closely match the sRGB color space as possible. Some monitors were manufactured to be close, and others have the ability to be set that way. Still others can't be directly set that way, but the system response can be tweaked with the basic controls (brightness, contrast, saturation, etc., as well as the curves adjustments in the video card drivers).
When the above conditions are met, you will see the following results:
A. sRGB image documents, which are the majority of those published online and are usually the default output from digital cameras, will appear consistently the same in color-managed (Photoshop) and non-color-managed applications. Depending on your needs you can configure Photoshop to work in the sRGB color space for creating your own images (this is actually Photoshop's default).
B. In Photoshop and other color-managed apps you will get good overall color-management of image documents in other color spaces, though you'll see just the out-of-gamut colors (i.e., those colors from a larger color space that just can't be displayed in the sRGB color space) as fully-saturated and thus somewhat inaccurate. In practice, most colors in most images fall within the sRGB gamut.
C. You'll see accurate color management by the partially* color-managed Internet Explorer 9, within the constraints of item B above.
D. Since the sRGB color profile that comes with every Windows system is well formed, and is the default, there is a near zero chance that a color-managed application will misinterpret it and produce screwy color. Such misinterpretation DOES happen with other profiles, a surprising number of times, even sometimes with profiles generated by good quality color measurement and profiling devices. Color profiles are not trivial, and some software simply can't use some profiles.
The real (non-trivial) trick in this strategy is actually getting your monitor to closely match the sRGB color space without using a monitor profile. However, it IS possible to get it close, and for many people "close enough" + "consistent across more apps" is better than "perfectly accurate in Photoshop but mismatching other apps". It can even be checked with a profiling device to help with the fine tuning.
-Noel
*IE9 interprets your document color profile and always transforms it into the sRGB color space, regardless of your monitor profile. Thus the only way to make the colors come out right is to have the monitor actually BE sRGB. So far, unfortunately, it appears IE10 in Windows 8 is following this same "half baked" strategy.

Print Color Management Problem w. Photoshop Elements and Tiger/Leopard

Has anyone tried printing with ICC profiles through Photoshop Elements 6 for Mac? Apparently, it does not work on Tiger nor Leopard? My prints look very dark and over-saturated.
The Datacolor folks, who make the Spyder3 calibrators I'm using, say my prints look like they are being "double color managed," possibly once by PSE and once by the printer driver (even though it's turned off).
Over at the Adobe Forums some say it's a problem with Leopard. I'm not so sure, because I found that printing color management works fine on a Mac with Photoshop Elements 4.01 and Tiger. Any comments? Thanks.

Aha! Got it. Adobe has confirmed that the problem is on their end. PSE 6 is double color managing the images. Here's what one user got in reply from Adobe on the subject. There are two separate answers:
Thank you for contacting Adobe Technical Support.
After consulting with my colleagues about the issue you raised, I can let you know the following:
The issue is both on our as well as the driver software side and the workaround we have given is the best available at this time. This issue is affecting all printers, not just Epson or Canon.
The soft proofing effect that you are seeing in the print preview is indeed an attempt at soft proofing. However since Photoshop Elements managed prints are incorrectly double colour managed it is not as useful as it was initially designed.
As to the exact details of why this occurred, we have no official information.
We believe that this will resolve the issues you are experiencing, however, should the reply not help solve the problem, please contact us again, quoting the case number given above, and we will re-open the case.
Answer # 2
We have had word back from our engineers regarding your issue.
The Photoshop Elements team are aware of the problem and are working with Apple and the printer manufacturers to get this to work correctly. In the meantime, the only workaround is to switch off colour management in Photoshop Elements and let the printer handle the colour management.
Unfortunately we can not make an estimation as to when a fix will be provided. We will close the case for the time being as there really is nothing more we can do about this issue besides offering the suggested workaround. Closing this case does not mean that the research will stop however and the engineers are working on a solution to this.
As the tech noted, let the printer handle the color instead. Tell PSE not to manage color so it is the step sending the data unaltered. When the print dialogue comes up, under the Color Correction heading, change the pull down menu to "ColorSync". In the menu below that, choose the correct profile for the paper you're using. If the Brightness menu is still active, look for any choice that allows you to turn it off. If none exists, leave it on Normal. If the options below that for Color Balance and Intensity are not grayed out, make sure they are at the center positions (no effect).
These steps are the same as before, except you're doing them in reverse. Photoshop is doing nothing and the print driver is handling the ColorSync chores rather than the other way around.

Kuler and Color Management

Wy is the complementary color in Kuler a shade of green? if I take in HSV the color 0º H,100 S,100V, I get a complementary of 137º H ,100 S,100 V. I thought I should get a shade of Cyan in HSV terms i think it should be 180º H, 100 S, 199 V. What am I doing wrong?

According to my own testing on Keynote '08, the answer is yes. Images in Keynote are the same as in Safari, which is color managed. Images are different in QuickTime, which is not color managed. I also would like to see definitive answer, though.

Color Management In Various Web Browsers For Untagged Images Broken Since 10.8 Upgrade

I have recently updated my early 2008 Mac Pro to 10.8 and have noticed that neither Safari, Firefox or Chrome handle untagged images correctly anymore. Instead of assuming sRGB as the ICC profile for an untagged image (like they did prior to upgrading), they now just convert to monitor profile which looks over-saturated on my wide gamut monitor (Dell 3007WFPHC, hardware calibrated with a Datacolor Spyder 3 Pro). Color management in Photoshop, Lightroom and all other previosuly color-aware applications appears unaltered. The interesting thing is that in Safari, if I open a link with "open in new tab", the untagged images are rendered as if their color profiles are sRGB and are displayed correctly! But just clicking the link in the same tab or "open in new window" results in the incorrect over-saturated colors. This doesn't make any sense. Anyone else have this same issue?

After digging around, I found that the behavior of Firefox can be changed to assume sRGB on untagged images by putting about:config into the address bar and changing the value of gfx.color_management.mode to 1. I vaguely recall doing something similar for Chrome years ago, but can't for the life of me rememebr what I did. When upgrading to 10.8, I did a fresh install so any mods to Chrome are no longer present.
As for Safari, I have never really used it and only notcied it behaved similarly when trying it because Chrome wasn't working. Still can't figure out why Safari works correctly when you select "open in new tab" though. Maybe this should be moved to the Safari forum?

I have a color management problem. I have OS X v 10.5, Adobe Photoshop Elements 6, and an Epson Stylus Photo R800. I want to print images I have scanned on a Epson Perfection 1660 Photo and corrected in Photoshop and get the colors accurate.

i have a color management problem. I have OS X v 10.5, Adobe Photoshop Elements 6, and an Epson Stylus Photo R800. I want to print images I have scanned on a Epson Perfection 1660 Photo and corrected in Photoshop and get the colors accurate.

I used the ColorSync utility to verify, and it came back with this report:
/Library/Printers/EPSON/InkjetPrinter/PrintingModule/SPR800_Core.plugin/Contents /Resources/ICCProfiles/SPR800 Standard.icc
   Tag 'dmnd': Tag size is not correct.
/Library/Application Support/Adobe/Color/Profiles/Recommended/CoatedFOGRA27.icc
   Tag 'desc': Tag size is not correct.
/Library/Printers/EPSON/InkjetPrinter/ICCProfiles/Standard.profiles/Contents/Res ources/Epson IJ Printer.icc
   Tag 'dmnd': Tag size is not correct.
/Library/Printers/EPSON/InkjetPrinter/PrintingModule/SPR800_Core.plugin/Contents /Resources/
I did not know what to do next. At the bottom of the window it said to go to www.apple.com/colorsync to find a tutorial. I got a message saying that link does not work. Tried to find the tutorial by searching at apple.com, but could not seem to locate it. Does anyone know what the report above means and what I should do about it?
Also, how to find that tutorial?
Re Using RGB all the way through, When I print from Photoshop Elements, I select Adobe RGB, Photoshop Manages under "Color Handling", Relative Colometric under "Intent" and "ColorSync" i the Epson printer box. Do you mean to do something different in this sequence?

Why is color management enabled (all, not just tagged) firefox showing images with higher black level than other color managed programs?

Using Win 7 and spyder calibrated (lut based) display. image editing programs show lower black level than firefox. Firefox images are too light.

Ehkä ensimmäisenä asiana on että sen saa pois päältä: https://addons.mozilla.org/fi/firefox/addon/color-management/
Sen jälkeen tämä näyttäisi olevan sama ongelma kuin täällä: http://www.dpreview.com/forums/thread/3569891
Tämä näyttäisi olevan ongelma, jota on vaikea toisintaa (siis kenen tahansa, jolla kalibrointi toimii). Vai olenko väärässä? Jos ongelmaa ei pysty toisintamaan, sitä ei ikävä kyllä ole myöskään mahdollista ratkaista.

Color management - Indesign with PS calibrated images?

How to:
In PS CMYK color space looks great using laser printer. Printer and monitor are calibrated - so what you see is what you get - but only in PS.
When the images are imported to Indesign or or converted to a PDF the colors look awful, dirty, with cast.
What is the best way to preserve color when using images in different design software.
Should color space be changed even though is all printed on same CMYK laser printer.
Any help would be great. Thanks.

>> In PS CMYK color space looks great using laser printer. Printer and monitor are calibrated - so what you see is what you get
Photoshop (Ps) is apparently making a good Conversion to your Print Space-Profile (or you are getting lucky they are close).
>> When the images are imported to Indesign or or converted to a PDF the colors look awful
Be sure you embedd profiles and set up your Adobe Color Settings to use the embedded profiles.
>> What is the best way to preserve color when using images in different design software
Establish device-independent 'native' Color Spaces (Working RGB and CMYK) and CONVERT to your PROOFING (print/monitor/Web) ICC profiles as a last step in the printing process and/or Saving a production copy in the target color space.
>> Should color space be changed even though is all printed on same CMYK laser printer.
Your Source Spaces will typically be different than your Print Space and your Monitor Space and your Web Space — CMYK is different in that it may be also be both Source/Target spaces — I create/work/edit in high-bit, high-gamut RGB and CONVERT to CMYK in the Printer Utility or in a final production copy when I know the target CMYK profile.
I recommend reading up on how Adobe Color Management Systems use ICC profiles...

Image Color management in Firefox 4 is off

I recently upgraded to FF4. Prior to that I had excellent color agreement in the 3 browsers I use to check the websites I design. Now the color in FF4 is way, WAY, OFF.
I use srgb tagged images and a calibrated monitor and the colors are correct in Chrome, IE8 AND in FF 3.63 but NOT in FF 4. I just spent about an hour trying to figure out why an image on a website I designed no longer matched its background when neither the image, the background nor anything else about the page had changed in a month. Turns out the only thing that changed was the browser! This is NOT GOOD.

You can set the pref gfx.color_management.mode to 0 on the about:config page to disable Color Management in Firefox. You need to close and restart Firefox to make the change effective.<br />
See:
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/gfx.color_management.mode
See:
* https://developer.mozilla.org/En/ICC_color_correction_in_Firefox
Caveats: The new QCMS color management system introduced in Firefox 3.5 currently only supports ICC version 2 color profiles, not version 4.
Test page: http://www.color.org/version4html.xalter - Is your system ICC Version 4 ready?

RVS4000 IPS identifies flickr images, etc., as Microsoft Color Management Module Buffer Overflow exploit

If I enable the IPS function in my RVS4000, some images from various popular websites like Flickr and blogspot will not load. They are detected by IPS as "EXPLOIT Microsoft Color Management Module Buffer Overflow"
You can test it yourself with this image hosted at blogspot:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_a7jkcMVp5Vg/TF3gjYJrHBI/AAAAAAAAMqM/ScJAA8y9nZk/s400/sorry.jpg
With IPS enabled, that image will not load. With IPS disabled, it will.
I am using firmware 1.3.2.0 and IPS signature version 1.42.
I believe IPS is incorrectly identifying these images as containing the color management buffer overflow exploit.
Any chance this could be corrected in the next IPS signature release?
As an aside, I would prefer to open a case with support about this, but I really can't figure out how to do so. I purchased the RVS4000 when it was still made by linksys. I would assume I should still be able to get support on it now that it's own by Cisco, but trying to open a case on the web for this seems impossible. Am I missing something?

i've just removed the proxy in my browser, so that it connects direct.
et voila: EXPLOIT Microsoft Color Management Module Buffer Overflow
but this rises the fear that IPS works just as expected when no (external) proxy is used.
that would be a serious problem, at least because it isn't mentioned in the online help/manual and because i'd leave my real ip at many places, which i wouldn't like.
i'd be happy to read a response from cisco to the Buffer Overflow (is it a false positive) and if IPS should work when a external proxy is used (via unencrypted connections, so the [w]rvs has a chance to read the communication.

Color Management on images in iweb

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for