Colors in FCP looks different than when playing in QT7

The colors of the video's in FCP looks different than when playing back in QuickTime. I wonder if it can be a color management setting in FCP? I have the same problem when playing a clip in AE. I have two FCP machines, but only one of them is having this problem. Any ideas of what I can do to get the right colors back?

Have you enabled Final Cut Studio Color Compatibility in the QT Player preferences?

Similar Messages

Flattened image looking different than when layers are all seperate?

Hello, I have an image that I've made in illustrator/photoshop and I noticed that when I save the image as a jpeg out of photoshop after it is finished it looks way different that it does while in photoshop. I merged the layers just out of curiosity and it looks that way after all of the layers are merged. I have no idea why it is doing that. Is there something I can do to change this? it is just happened to one of my images. I have multiple pieces in this style and it hasn't happened to any of the other ones. Any help is appreciated, thanks

Try adding a copy merged layer to the top of the stack before flaterning (Shift Alt Ctrl e)

PDF document looks different than when printed

With Acrobat Reader 9, we've noticed that when we print the documents, their is some sort of margin in the printed report, but when we view it on screen in Adobe Acrobat Reader 9, there is no margin.
Is there some setting in Adobe Acrobat Reader that could be causing this?
-Scott

Change the document so that it prints without scaling.
Mike

Colors in Photoshop look different elsewhere

When I open a picture in Photoshop CS3 or Camera RAW for editing and then save that picture, and then open the saved picture in any program other than Photoshop, the colors and tints and saturation are very different. I am pretty sure this has to do with my color profile in Photoshop, but I've checked many online sources and my color settings seem to match up more or less with what's recommended. My camera is set to sRGB and Photoshop is set to sRGB IEC61966-2.1, and this is happening both with JPEGs and RAWs, from two different Canon cameras.
Pictures look more natural when viewed in Photoshop than in other programs (I think), even before any editing...how could this be?
The weird things is, when I go to Edit > Assign Profile and then select "Lighthouse (D65 G2.2 A34.29)" from the drop-down menu, the image in Photoshop now looks exactly like it does when I open the same image in an image viewing program. What does this mean?
Also, when viewing my photos in Bridge CS3, the colors look like they do in Photoshop until I zoom in 100% and the photo finishes loading the actual pixels, at which point the colors dramatically change.
How can I edit pictures in Photoshop and Camera RAW when what I'm editing is not what's actually seen? This is very frustrating. Anybody have any ideas?

Thank you both for your replies. My monitor has been properly calibrated, but not for a long time. I know that this will not help when it comes to color representation, but this is not my problem. My problem is that the images in Photoshop look different than elsewhere. I am wondering if there is either a way to make Photoshop display the photos as they will appear on websites and such, or a way to save the photos as they actually appear in Photoshop.
I find it odd that I have not noticed this until recently. There is a very significant difference between the colors in the two environments. If the problem truly has rooted from an uncalibrated monitor, I will simply calibrate it (I would have already but I don't have a calibration device any more). But I don't think that's the whole problem here.

The way Aperture renders my Nikon RAW (NEF) files look different than...

The was Aperture renders my NEF files looks different than NX...
Ok so I use all the in camera setting/tools to the best of abilities to try and cut my editing down as much as possible but when shooting RAW I end up having to tweak every images to get them back to what they really look like... I shoot often RAW and JPG combined and when I open a NEF in NX and a JPG in PS they are identical and need very little work, when I use Aperture the NEF files are very different looking from the JPG (or NEF in NX) and every single one needs tweaking (I get more redish/pinkish skin, often a hint of green cast to (slightly off WB/tone thing) and more contrast.
Below is screenshot showing the difference between a JPG (or NEF in NX) and a RAW file in Aperture
[img]http://www.pbase.com/ray645/image/120052970/original.jpg[/img]
This is just a silly snap shot in very flat overcast light, and has the least amount of shift or difference of any image type so far, when I use strobes, shoot for a more contrasty image, gel for color and manual WB the differences are huge almost to the point that you would think you where looking at two completely different images and not the same NEF opened in different software.
How do I go about getting Aperture to render my NEF's more like what I shot like NEF in NX, JPG in anything, and even the back of the camera screen?

Thank you, that seems like will work, just having the boost turned down a bit on import has helped tremendously but I cant stop feeling like I am moving towards the "Fix it in post" mentality
I will need to get better at tweaking my images... No matter how I try I cant kill the pinking skin or the very faint green glow in blond hair or bright neutral tones without affecting other areas of the image.. I am sure I will figure it out but anyone having any tips or links that could speed up my process I would appreciate it.
The green is weird its like someone snuck a small florescent light into all my shoots without telling me, not major but enough to be annoying.
I shoot a ton of motor sports (3000 images a weekend) and shoot JPG and have gotten good at using in camera pre sets, knowing what I got and getting it right in the camera, I wish Nikon would give up the code or whatever is needed for all the info to be carried over to Aperture..... I would pay the $100 or whatever to use the NX engine in Aperture

Need help The image I saw on the LCD looks different than the actual photo

i had canon camera and had problem The image I saw on the LCD looks different than the actual photo.any body can kelp me
[IMG]http://tralalatrilili.ga/thanks.png[/IMG]

Do you capture in RAW or JPEG? What software do you use to view your image? Is your monitor calibrated? What is the brightness level on your camera LCD? All of these information can affect your image. And keep in mind that image on the back of the camera is often brighter and more saturated.
Weekend Travelers Blog | Eastern Sierra Fall Color Guide

'Play Full Screen' looks different than 'play' (makes timing errors)

In iMovie, 'Play Full Screen' behaves differently than 'Play' Makes timing errors, cuts off the beginning of commentaries, etc.

You can't disable tap/zoom scaling. What happens if you add a margin and disable thumbnail?
Can you convert them to a Keynote presentation (Hype?)?
One option would be to reduce the original video dimensions and add a frame/mask around it before adding into a book, that way when it is expanded, it sits at a smaller size. Bunch of work, maybe, so unless you have higher rez video, that may be your best option.

Export back to FCP looks different

I have a project in apple prores 422 in FCP. I sent it to color with no problems and did my color correct. Then I rendered it, and sent it back to Final cut pro. the image in FCP is considerably warmer and the blacks are clipped so there is no detail in black areas. It looks completely different in Color.
Any ideas of what I'm doing wrong? All of this is being judged on the same monitor so that's not the issue.
Thanks for your help,
Adam
Message was edited by: Adam Salky
Message was edited by: Adam Salky

The issue here, and its surprising you are coming up empty with the search because it is discussed almost hourly, is a gamma difference in Quicktime.
Up to Snow Leopard, MacOS has based their luminance transfer characteristic (gamma) coefficient of 1.8 to display graphic images on a Cinema Display or other panel. This makes sense to Apple, since they assume that almost 100 percent of their client base are using their computers for Photoshop, word processing and so on... and 1.8 is the prepress rendition that is standard industry-wide.
Broadcast video, on the other hand, uses a Rec709 gamma characteristic that is in the range of 2.2, which is more than a few percent different. It isn't your Quicktime media that is actually darker and a different color, it is the way Quicktime is decoding and displaying it within the MacOS, which is why it can look different on the same screen. Unless you instruct FCP to operate under Rec709 2.2 gamma, it will default to the system OS Colorsync 1.8 coefficient.
COLOR operates outside the Mac OS Colorsync supervisor -- it is entirely predicated on a system gamma of 2.2.
jPo

DVDSP 3 somewhat BLOCKY look on DVD when played back

I have been shooting my home footage on a Canon GL2
editing in FCP 4.5
and when I have a finished sequence to be placed on a DVD, I have been exporting the Self Contained Quicktime w/ chapter makers.
I then importing these Quicktime files into DVDSP-3
I have experimented with serveral of the encoding setting (Bit Rate, 1 pass VBR, 2 pass VBR etc...)
I have been told in forums before not to go above 8mps on the bit rate in order to ensure that my DVD will play on most players.
So, the best setting that I have found is the 2 pass VBR, 7.5 average, 8 max bit rate, and Best on the motion estimation...
But, I have still been somewhat frustrated when watching these DVDs back because of the blocky look I am seeing in some of the scenes.
Is there a better way I should be compressing?
Should I be using compressor instead... strait from my FCP timeline... to MPEG 2?
Shorter GOPs? Would that effect how the DVDs will play on some players?
I appreciate any help!!!
Thanks, Greg

Greg
You may want to try an alternative Encoder ! A bit drastic but I have had so many problems with MPEG2's using Compressor and encoding through DVDSP (probably down to me not understanding the 'black art'!) that I bought BitVice Vers 1.6 from Innobits. It is not cheap (£215/$317) and only encodes MPEG2's but the results I am getting are very acceptable just using the default settings but changing the target bit rate to 5.5. Very easy/simple to use. The pictures have a real 'punch' to them and there are no artifacts/blurring etc - which is a major bonus! You can download a trial version which encodes as normal but places a watermark over the top of the final output. Even so, it does give you an idea of what it can do and it made me purchase the encoder straight away!

Why does a .mov slideshow look much darker when played with idvd

I have created a .mov slideshow from iphoto. I now want to write it to a dvd using iDVD. When setting up the various dropzones the images look great. When I play the .mov in Quicktime, the images look great. When I preview the proposed DVD, all of the images look to contrasty / dark. Why is this and how can I fix it?

Hi Klaus,
Me thinks you jest my good man.....
Again I repeat, in every other application, the images look the way they are meant to be.
Only in iDVD do they become "corrupted".
Anyone who has anything to do with digital imaging knows you should calibrate your monitors.
An industry standard calibrated environment is a must when dealing with a digital imaging environment.
iDVD is screwing up the images ad making them darker.
Quicktime isn't.
iPhoto isn't.
Photoshop isn't.
Capture One Pro isn't.
Adobe Bridge isn't.
Camera Raw isn't.
InDesign isn't.
Acrobat isn't.
I can list many more applications on both PCs and Macs that correctly display the images.
iDVD is the only one that screws them up!!!!!
Are you seriously suggesting that calibrating our monitors is the cause of iDVD displaying images incorrectly and different to all of the above mentioned software?
Me thinks you jest my good man.....
Kind regards,
Mike

Duplicate version looks different than original -- same adjustments

This morning I imported a few photos (D70 RAW), found they looked good with the default processing (no adjustments applied other than the default RAW 1.1 processing), and created duplicate versions to crop to different sizes. The duplicate versions look different -- the dark areas of the photos are lighter and noisier (sorry, still learning proper photo terminology). The duplicate versions have the identical adjustments (none). I tried toggling the cropping on/off, and the duplicate versions still look different.
This is very odd... has anybody else experienced this?
iMac 24" 2.16GHz Mac OS X (10.4.8) 2.0 GB RAM NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT 256 MB Nikon D70

I did a little more investigation on this issue, and found that when I make the duplicate version, the image still looks identical. It is when I crop the image that things get messed up -- even if I then remove the crop adjustment.

Just bought MSI R5770 and card looks different than expected

I bought this as an open Box from Fry's today.
When I opened it up, the card looks completely different than the pictures I've seen online.
The label on the back says it is a R5770 PMD1G and the serial number on the label matches the one on the box. But the fan/heatsink combination is completely different. The board layout (capacitors, etc) seems to be different as well
I'm especially concerned by the small size of the fan compared to what I was expecting.
Before I install it, I wanted to make sure I actually have the correct card that I paid for. Here is a link to a pic.

Quote from: Sansfear on 04-May-10, 19:29:16
She slapped a new reduced price sticker on it and assured me that they'd test it to make sure it worked. I'm willing to bet that if I go back there in a few days, that it will be back on the shelves and still have the wrong card in the box.
I wouldn't expect anything less from them. It was probably back on the shelf 15 minutes after you walked out. If its worth anything, I don't buy anything open box. The small savings isn't worth the hassle.

Motion project imported into FCP looks different...

I have a Motion project that moves 17 magazine covers across a background. When I preview it in Motion it looks great, but when I import it into FCP the mags overlap and run into each other. What could be happening during import and is there a fix??

I'm posting in response to my own question because this may actually be a bug. When I import the Motion project into FCP with the Motion layers locked, the animation is altered. When I go back into Motion and unlock all the layers and import into FCP, the animation is perfect. No kidding, locked tracks and the animation is funky, unlocked and it's fine. Anyone ever stumble on this??

Colors in iPhoto look great - not when pics are viewed on web / printed out

When I go in and adjust my images in iPhoto, nothing looks the same when I print them out at costco or view them on the web.
I understand about profiles and color spaces... I'm just wondering what is the easiest way other iPhoto users have found to calibrate their macs so that what they view in iPhoto is what they will see when printing the images.

I am having the EXACT same problem and it's driving me crazy! I'm ready to set my old PC up again.....Can anyone answer this problem?

920 cartridge looks different than the old one

I just bought some new ink cartridges for my Officejet 6500a 710n-z printer. I bought the same 920 XL cartridges that I have bought and successfully installed before. However, the most recent ones would not install!
These new cartridges are different than the others -- on the bottom, they only have the gold-colored contact plate. The others had the gold plate and a little bubble-like item that I think was called an ink window. Other than that, the cartridges are exactly the same.
Have these cartridges changes? What do I need to do to make them work in my printer?
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hello BezaNH,
Welcome to the HP Support Forums!
Sorry to hear about the issues with the Officejet 6500 not reading the new generation cartridges. I believe I found a document that may help you resolve this.
Some steps you will have done such as, remove and install cartridges, I would still suggest following through with all the steps. The images of the cartridges are that of the older generations cartridges, the steps are the same regardless.
'The following ink cartridge appears to be missing or damaged' Error Message Displays on the Printer....
Let me know how those steps work out, I will be keeping an eye on the thread.
JERENDS
I work on behalf of HP
Please click “Accept as Solution” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" to the left of the reply button to say “Thanks” for helping!

Colors in FCP looks different than when playing in QT7

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for