Colorsync between PS CS6 and AI CS6

There appears to be an issue with colorsync between PS CS6 and AI CS6. This is what I have come across: Both applications are color synced to sRGB color space, converting from and to other colorspaces using Adobe Ace, absolutly colometric. An sRGB document is created in PS CS6, featuring a square of the color #000050. After that an empty RGB doc is created in AI CS6, also with an sRGB profile and this PS file is placed within. The color of aforementioned square, checking with the AI color picker is now #0f004f and not #000050. Creating within this very AI document a rectangle of the color #000050 and then exporting this file to PS, you'll end up with a PS file, featuring 2 squares of the same color #000050. What is going on here. Thanks in advance for any helpfull comments. ATK

Hi Monika,
...OK, and how do I get the color value of a pixel within a linked image in AI?
ATK

Similar Messages

How to set up the interaction between InDesign CS6 8.0 and Photoshop CS 6 - if Photoshop is installed and the 64 and 32-bit?? default InDesign refers to the 64-bit version of Photoshop and scripts do not work.

how to set up the interaction between InDesign CS6 8.0 and Photoshop CS 6 - if Photoshop is installed and the 64 and 32-bit?? default InDesign refers to the 64-bit version of Photoshop and scripts do not work.

Nice of you to point it out here as I at least don’t follow Mr.Nash’s blog regularly.

CS6/CC - switching between source monitor and timeline disaster

Now what is this?
It all works fine until you try DV Output.
In DV Output mode every time you switch between source monitor and the timeline it goes to some scary ritual:
1. output disabled on external monitor
2. some crazy flickering happens
3. ok, now updated picture on external monitor finally appears
Same happens when switching back to timeline.
Also when scrubbing through timeline video and audio is late for a few centuries on DV device/external monitor/speaker.
Why Adobe screwed firewire environment editing? I'm thinking about changing my job. Editing with Premiere is killing me lately. I'm thinking about starting to work with bees or strawberries, or something else less frustrating.
And Premiere CS 5.5 was the best editing software ever released. It has no similar problems. Why CS6 and CC are retarded?

I'm just asking for properly working feature which is alredy implemented and worked fine in earlier versions.
Adobe, can this be fixed, please?

What is the difference, if any, between Photoshop CS6 and CC?

What is the difference, if any, between Photoshop CS6 and Photoshop CC?

Thank you, Garima. This helps!
Larry
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:14:08 -0800
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: What is the difference, if any, between Photoshop CS6 and CC?
    Re: What is the difference, if any, between Photoshop CS6 and CC?
    created by Garima.J in Photoshop for Beginners - View the full discussion
Hi LarryMeikle
The biggest difference between Photoshop CS6 and Photoshop CC is that Photoshop CC is subscription-based--you have to subscribe to Adobe's Creative Cloud service to use it. Also, Photoshop CC includes new features that were not in Photoshop CS6.
Let us know if that helps.
Thanks!
Garima
     Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed a screen image in your message please visit the thread in the forum to embed the image at http://forums.adobe.com/message/6118812#6118812
     Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/6118812#6118812
     To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/6118812#6118812. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
           Start a new discussion in Photoshop for Beginners at Adobe Community
For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/thread/416458?tstart=0.

I am currently on the Photoshop and lightroom cc bundle, but for my coarse i need InDesign, if i upgrade to full package ($600) do i get that aswell? is it a dramatic difference between the cc and Cs6? would it be better to invest in it, and can i do a pa

I am currently on the Photoshop and lightroom cc bundle, but for my coarse i need InDesign, if i upgrade to full package ($600) do i get that aswell? is it a dramatic difference between the cc and Cs6? would it be better to invest in it, and can i do a payment plan?

The complete CC has indesign included in it.
Regarding your second question: CC is the advanced version of CS6 with advanced & additional features & functions.
The payment plan for education will suit you the best since you are studying.
Please refer to Adobe Creative Cloud for students and teachers | Adobe
Student software discounts, student eligibility | Adobe
Regards
Rajshree

Problem of variation of color between Firewoks CS5 and CS6 ?

Hy everyone !
I have problem of variation of color between Firewoks CS5 and CS6.
An Hexa color defined in a CS5 file, dont have the same Hexa component when opened with Firewoks CS6 ?
Example with au GREEN color :
#80BB39 (Created with Firewoks CS5)
is becoming
#7FBC2E (When opened with Firewoks CS6)
Thank's for your help.

Nemo71 wrote:
I have had a problem with opening some PSD template files. It doesn't happen all the time and it doesn't happen with every template. All of the templates were downloaded as zip files and opened and saved using Photoshop CS 5 on a Windows XP PC.
As far as I know Photoshop can not open Zip files. If you unzip the zip archive and it contained PSD files. How do you know they were all saved on a XP system with Photoshop CS5 with max compatibility. The message you getting seem to be contradicting that.

Any known compatible issues between Illustrator CS6 & Photoshop CS2?

Any known compatible issues between Illustrator CS6 & Photoshop CS2?? thanks alot.

What exactly do you want to do with both the apps?
Since the exchange of files from AI to PS is based on PDF, I wouldn't expect problems. The only question is, if Photoshop CS2 will be able to read PDF 1.5, since that's the format AI CS6 embeds in its files. If it doesn't work, you could still save a PDF from AI and make it any other PDF version.
Illustrator can read lower version PSD.
Copy-Paste might be a problem. I can't experiment, since I don't have that PS version any more.

Differences between Photoshop CS6 (legacy version) & Photoshop CS6

What is the difference between Photoshop CS6 (legacy version) and Photoshop CS6? Legacy box has a red Adobe logo in top right corner on the box face and Photoshop CS6 has a blue logo with Ps in it and is located in the bottom right corner on the box face?

I take it that you're still continuing your best bang for buck search mentioned in your earlier posts?
Does this help?
"What is the difference between Photoshop CS6 [Legacy Version]($410) and Photoshop CS6 ($699)"
http://forums.adobe.com/message/5979283

What is the difference between Elements & CS6

What is the difference between Elements & CS6
Message title was edited by: Brett N

There are many differences, too many to list really, but here are some of the major ones:
1. Elements comes with the catalog based Organizer. CS6 has the file navigation based Bridge.
2. The Elements Editor has stripped down versions of many of the same tools that CS6 has. Same tools, fewer options.
javascript:;
3. Elements Editor has Quick and Guided editing modes to simply workflow to the most basic needs.
4. Elements does not support CMYK and has very little support for 16-bit images.
For a more comprehensive guide, please see:
FAQ: Why is Photoshop Elements cheaper? What's different about Photoshop?

What is difference between adobe photoshop and photoshop extended cs5

what is difference between adobe photoshop and photoshop extended cs5

Hi,
The biggest difference is the 3D feature set is only available in Ps Extended CS5. Exclusive to Extended CS5 also are timeline for video editing, Dicom format support, Stack mode blending, analysis measurement tools, and some 32-bit painting capabilities.
Some things have changed for the Photoshop Extended CS6 version, mainly enabling more of the video editing features for both products.
regards,
steve

Thin white line between line art and live paint fill?

I am using live paint to paint cartoon character illustrations. The artwork is brought into Illustrator CS3 and live traced. Then I convert it to a live paint group and use the paint bucket to fill. Everything looks fine no matter how much I zoom in. If I bring the AI file into Photoshop CS6 I can see a thin white line between the black line art and the fill. This is most noticeable where black meets black. I can also see this sometimes in file previews while browsing through files. If the white line cannot be seen in Illustrator is the file ok? I did just upgrade to CS6 if that would make a difference.
Thank you for any help.

If the white line cannot be seen in Illustrator is the file ok?
Without knowing specifics,nobody knows.
"Okay" for what?
If it looks okay to you in Illustrator, then it's okay for viewing in Illustrator.
If the export of it does not look okay in Photoshop at 1:1 or higher zoom, then it's probably not okay for whatever you're going to do with that raster image.
If it's printed to a low-res composite printer, then it may be okay, because the printer may not be able to resolve the whitish pixels.
If it's printed for commercial (color-separated) reproduction, it may not be okay, depending on the scale at which it will be printed, and on other considerations partially described below.
The autotrace routine does not build traps. Typically, when you color-fill cartoon line art manually, you don't make the shapes that define the fills merely "kiss" the black line work, as would the default treatments of a stupid autotrace. The black line work typically overprints the fills, thereby creating printing traps.
Suppose a portion of your cartoon is a hand-drawn closed circle. The black line work is irregular; it varies in width, having been drawn with a marker or a brush. The circle is colored in with a medium green. There are no sloppy gaps in the original between the green and the black.
You scan it and autotrace it. Unless you apply some deliberate care to make it do otherwise, the autotrace is going to create a compound path, filled with black, and with no stroke; and a green simple path which (hopefully) exactly "kisses" (abuts) the black path. Adobe's on-screen antialiasing of the edge where the two colors abut may or may not cause your monitor to display a faint whitish or grayish sliver between the two colors.
Similarly, Photoshop's rasterization of it, or the rasterization of a raster export filter may do the same, and may actually result in some off-color pixels along the edge. (Your description of the scenario kinda raises the question of why you are auto-tracing something that you're then just going to rasterize in Photoshop anyway. Why do that? Why not just work with the scan in Photoshop?.)
So let's leave Photoshop out of the picture and assume you are autotracing it because you want vector artwork. You zoom way in to see if the whitish sliver enlarges. It doesn't, so you assume it's just an aberation of Illustrator's on-screen antialising. And then someone tells you you're in the clear. But are you? Not so fast.
Let's assume the artwork is destined for commercial (color-separated) printing. Further assume the color of the autotraced black is 100% K, and the color of the autotraced green is 100Y 50C. Three inks involved. None of those three inks are shared between the two objects. So even if the paths do, in fact, perfectly abut, there is no "wiggle room" built in for the minor alignment shifts that almost aways do occur on press.
Bottom line: Even if you do determine that the common antialiasing aberations that frequently occur on-screen in Adobe apps is just that—just an onscreen aberation, that does not necessarily mean your file is suitable for commercial color-separated reproduction.
First, you need to understand that autotracing is not the one-click, instant "conversion" of a raster image to vector artwork that far too many think it to be. Just like everything else, you don't just launch a program like Illustrator, start autotracing things willy-nilly without understanding what's really going on. Just like anyting else, you can use an autotrace feature intelligently or...well...not.
You have options. Illustrator provides an auto-trapping feature. Read up on it in the documentation so you understand what it's all about. Alternatively, you can expand the results of your autotrace, select all the black linework and apply a composite color that includes 100% K and reasonable percentages of C, M, and Y (a so-called "rich black"). Or,depending on the artwork and the desired results, you may consider doing the autotrace as centerlines so you have stroked paths, not just filled paths for the linework. That way, using the flood fill (so called LivePaint) will cause the auto-created fill objects to extend to the paths, not just to the edges of their strokes. Then set the linework to overprint.
At any rate, if you are doing this professionally, you need to read up on the principles and practices of trapping and color separation.
JET

What are the differences between Cartweaver CF and PHP?

I am on my final step of finishing the webpage that I am building and saw Cartweaver for a shopping cart that is compatible with dreamweaver. But I looked into the site and hey didnt give an explanation between the CF and PHP version. So I would like to know the differences and which one would work best with Dreamweaver Cs6.

Hi Kendall,
As far as application differences, functionality wise, there is no difference. Both Cartweaver 4 CF and Cartweaver 4 PHP function and present themselves exactly the same. As far as implementation there are very subtle differences due the the way CF and PHP work, but they both are very close and use "includes" to place the Cartweaver functionality in your site penetration pages. The web based store admins work exactly the same for both. So you get the same results no matter which direction you go.
Now what is the difference between PHP and ColdFusion? That is a very important question as it will impact what platform you use from now on - for this site, and possably future sites you build so this is worth taking a little time to consider.
Which is best? Well this could lead to a discussion like which is best Mac or PC? There are evangelists and zealots on both sides. The real truth of the matter is both are good choices, you just need to decide which is best, for you. One poster said "what does your host support" - good point, but if you are new to working with dynamic web sites and are deciding what platform you want to go with there are more important factors to consider than what your current host supports. You can always select a different host.
The biggest difference between CF and PHP is they way they are written - PHP is script pasted, much like JavaScript, CFML is tag based much like html. Because of this CFML is often a little easier to learn because it's a bit easier to look at something and figure out what it's doing. So you may want to take a little time looking at this aspect.
Fact is though, with either one because Cartweaver does the vast majority of anything to do with code for you, learning the language is something you may not choose to do anyway. An advantage to PHP is that it has much wider support, so finding developers to help out, or hosts can easier with PHP. So if you don't have any desire to dig in and learn code as you go and only want to learn what's necessary to get your shopping cart site up, then the steps and learning curve are pretty much the same and PHP may be a good way to go. If this raises more questions than it answerers, let me know I'd be happy to discuss this more with you offline.
So, back to the basics - from a functionality point, they are both the same. You only need to choose which platform you think will work best for you and go from there.
I hope this helps. If you have any other questions at all, ask away.
Lawrence Cramer - *Adobe Community Professional*
http://www.Cartweaver.com
PHP & ColdFusion Shopping Cart for Adobe Dreamweaver
Stay updated:
http://www.facebook.com/cartweaver
http://www.twitter.com/cartweaver
http://blog.cartweaver.com

Timeline window missing button to switch between frame mode and timeline mode

I'm using Photoshop CS6 Extended.
This is what my timeline looks like now.
In tutorials they refer to a button that should be to the left of the drop menu that says "forever". The button is supposed to allow you to switch between frame mode and timeline mode.
this is what the timeline window looks like in timeline mode and with the button that allows you to switch.
I've already tried reinstalling and upgrading to CS6 extended, as some forums suggested.
Please help. Animation is the core reason that I need photoshop and without this button I'm extremely limited. Thanks.

OK. This should work. Copy and past the below script into Script Editor, save it as an AppleScript application to the Desktop. Double-click it and it should change to grayscale. Double-click it again and it'll toggle back.
tell application "System Preferences" to activate
delay 1
tell application "System Events"
tell process "System Preferences"
click the menu item "Universal Access" of the menu "View" of menu bar 1
click the radio button "Seeing" of the first tab group of window "Universal Access"
click the checkbox "Use grayscale" of tab group 1 of window "Universal Access"
end tell
end tell
tell application "System Preferences" to activate
delay 1
tell application "System Events"
tell process "System Preferences"
click the menu item "Universal Access" of the menu "View" of menu bar 1
click the radio button "Seeing" of the first tab group of window "Universal Access"
click the checkbox "Use grayscale" of tab group 1 of window "Universal Access"
end tell
end tell
tell application "System Preferences" to quit

What is difference between sy-tabix and sy-index.

SAP Seniors,
Can you please let me know what is difference between sy-index and sy-tabix.
I read the SAP help, it is confusing for me. it looks like both are same from help. please help me.
Thank you
Anitha.

HI,
Here is a brief description of difference between SY_TABIX and SY_INDEX and using them with several conditions.
SY-TABIX
Current line of an internal table. SY-TABIX is set by the statements below, but only for index tables. The field is either not set or is set to 0 for hashed tables.
APPEND sets SY-TABIX to the index of the last line of the table, that is, it contains the overall number of entries in the table.
COLLECT sets SY-TABIX to the index of the existing or inserted line in the table. If the table has the type HASHED TABLE, SY-TABIX is set to 0.
LOOP AT sets SY-TABIX to the index of the current line at the beginning of each loop lass. At the end of the loop, SY-TABIX is reset to the value that it had before entering the loop. It is set to 0 if the table has the type HASHED TABLE.
READ TABLE sets SY-TABIX to the index of the table line read. If you use a binary search, and the system does not find a line, SY-TABIX contains the total number of lines, or one more than the total number of lines. SY-INDEX is undefined if a linear search fails to return an entry.
SEARCH <itab> FOR sets SY-TABIX to the index of the table line in which the search string is found.
SY-INDEX
In a DO or WHILE loop, SY-INDEX contains the number of loop passes including the current pass.
Hope this helps.
Thank you,
Pavan.

Difference between sy-tabix and sy-index?

tell me about sy-tabix and sy-index?what is the difference between sy-tabix and sy-index?
Moderator Message: Please search before posting. Read the [Forum Rules Of Engagement |https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/HOME/RulesofEngagement] for further details.
Edited by: Suhas Saha on Jun 18, 2011 5:33 PM

HI,
Here is a brief description of difference between SY_TABIX and SY_INDEX and using them with several conditions.
SY-TABIX
Current line of an internal table. SY-TABIX is set by the statements below, but only for index tables. The field is either not set or is set to 0 for hashed tables.
APPEND sets SY-TABIX to the index of the last line of the table, that is, it contains the overall number of entries in the table.
COLLECT sets SY-TABIX to the index of the existing or inserted line in the table. If the table has the type HASHED TABLE, SY-TABIX is set to 0.
LOOP AT sets SY-TABIX to the index of the current line at the beginning of each loop lass. At the end of the loop, SY-TABIX is reset to the value that it had before entering the loop. It is set to 0 if the table has the type HASHED TABLE.
READ TABLE sets SY-TABIX to the index of the table line read. If you use a binary search, and the system does not find a line, SY-TABIX contains the total number of lines, or one more than the total number of lines. SY-INDEX is undefined if a linear search fails to return an entry.
SEARCH <itab> FOR sets SY-TABIX to the index of the table line in which the search string is found.
SY-INDEX
In a DO or WHILE loop, SY-INDEX contains the number of loop passes including the current pass.
Hope this helps.
Thank you,
Pavan.

Colorsync between PS CS6 and AI CS6

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for