Combining 16-bit and 24-bit files in Waveburner

I have a project that consists mostly of 24-bit bounces I did in Logic, but one of the song files is a 16-bit AIF. I've imported all of the files into Waveburner, done the necessary editing for "mastering," and now I want to burn a CD. My
Preferences have Powr Dithering on, but I'm wondering if that will adversely affect the 16-bit file.
I thought about turning dithering off in the Preferences, and then just applying it individually to each 24-bit file to avoid any problems with the 16-bit file, but I couldn't find a way to do that.
Can anyone tell me if having dithering on is going to muck up the 16-bit file when it comes to CD burning?
Thanks!

Interestingly enough they are not all 48K. The music & FX are 44.1K.
I have heard this before that you should avoid mixing 44.1 and 48K.
However when I heard this I had already been mixing the two rates for years without problem.
I have always mixed these without problem yet. Can I ask why it is best to avoid this ? What is it that you are asking FCP & Computer to do which will create problems ? What are the problems which can be caused by mixing 44 & 48 ?
Thanks for your reply

Similar Messages

Bridge CS6 64-bit and 32-bit FREEZE on Launch

Now I am having problems with Bridge CS6 again. Both 64-bit and 32-bit suddenly have the behavior of freezing on launch. I get the application window open but no icons populate and I can't do anything in the interface. Not even close the application. I have to use Windows Task Manager to quit the application forcibly.
Not sure what's going on. I went to the start menu and hit Ctrl+Bridge 64-bit to give me the options to reset preferences, dump the cache, and one other option that I also checkmarked. Still no dice.
Can anyone help me out before Adobe Customer Support becomes available in 4 hours?

While searching for a set of files on my computer using traditional search in the gui i discovered that the indexing functionality of windows was turned off. I tried to turn it on and search again but kept getting the error that indexing was turned off. I went to the event viewer and saw hundreds of events related to this error. I thought by suspicion that there might be a correlation between this windows malfunction and adobe bridge not functioning properly. After finding an appropriate solution to reset the search functionality of Windows known as 1) Windows Search and also as 2) Indexing, I tried to run Bridge again and now it works just fine. So the solution to the Bridge problem was to fix Windows Search and also fix Indexing of files.

Lenovo Provides 32 bit and 64 bit versions of VISTA & 7 by recovery media for FREE BUT HOW???

Lenovo advertises this title:
When is it possible to switch between 32 bit and 64 bit versions of Microsoft Operating Systems by using recovery media?
In this page:
http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site.wss/MIGR-74752.html
BUT
Doesn’t give any info that how??? I
How do I contact a Lenovo Support Centre to place an order. Link brings you to contact numbers for Lenovo and after I call them they say these numbers are for IBM and it is only for hardware support.
I am wondering got know how on earth they accept orders for this type of complex issue by phone???
Specially that I am dealing with so special situation and I need some e-mail address to describe it Lenovo and wait for the answer...
I appreciate it if somebody could help me with this...
Thanks in advance for your help guys...

Awesome dude,
Thanks for well described reply. I enjoyed it specially when I found out you don't work for Lenovo.
I am curious to know something. I could buy Windows 7 Bit for a very good price form Microsoft offers for university students that it probably cost me the same price as recovery media. Do you think it is a good idea to install a totally fresh windows 7 (NOT from the recovery media) on my t400s?
I am asking this because when you install operation system with provided recovery Media it builds another partition
with this name SERVICEV003 that is about 2 Gb and contains system files and stuff related to my laptop. I am afraid if I install windows without using recovery media but using Microsoft original DVDs then my laptop doesn't function properly?
What is your idea about this issue,
Thanks again for all your help, I appreciate it,
Cheers,
Mehrad

How to create a ARD for 64 Bit And 32 Bit Systems

Dear All,
Please help me to solve my problem. I am not able to create the ARD for both type systems (32 Bit and 64 Bit Bit). My system is OS Windows 7, 32 bit operating system. Sometimes my add-ons run successfully for 32 bit , sometimes for 64 bit. I am creating 2 ARD's for each add-on but I have failed.
I have read many threads but I got no success.
Please help me.
Regards

Hi Pedro Magueija, Edy Simon,
Thanks for your reply. I follow below mentioned steps to create the ARD File. I build my add-on code as mentioned below:
Solution Configuration
Solution Platform
Project Properties/Compile/ Advanced Compile Option/ Target CPU
Add-on Registration Data Generator x64 Option
Debug
x86
x86
FALSE (Unchecked)
Debug
x86
x86
True (Checked)
I was able to create and use ARD by doing in above mentioned way. But sometimes these ARD doesn't work or doesn't get installled.
Regards

How to load both 32 bit and 64 bit version of addon on same machine

Hi,
When deploying an addon using SAP Business One Extension Manager, how can we install both 32 bit and 64 bit version of the addon for same machine?
If the OS is 64 bit, SAP allows to install and use both 32 bit SBO client and 64 bit SBO client. I want that when the 32 bit SBO client is used, my 32 bit addon should get loaded, and when 64 bit client is used, my 64 bit addon should get loaded.
But the SBO Extension Manager loads the addon for a given company; there seems to be no option to specify different addon files for 32 bit and 64 bit.
Is there a way?
Thanks.

Hi Rajesh,
There might be the problem while creating the add-on.
It is the system behavior that once you login to 32 bit SAP Client, you can use only 32 bit Add-on. Means 32 bit add-on will be loaded automatically.
Same is in the case of 64 Bit.
What you have to do is:
If OS is 64 Bit and you have installed both 32 and 64 Bit SAP Client then once open 32 bit client and install only 32 bit add-on
Then open 64 Bit SAP Client and install only 64 bit add-on.
By doing this you will be able to use 32 bit add-on on 32 bit SAP Client and vice versa.
Hope it helps.
Thanks & Regards
Ankit Chauhan

How do I swap 64-bit and 32-bit floats from little-endian to big-ending

I am trying to read a file that could contain a list of 64-bit floats or 32-bit floats that were written on a PC so they are little-endian.
I need to convert the float values to big-endian so that I can process the values. I know that straight swapping each byte with the adjacent byte doesn't work (especially since their floating point values). I've tried swapping them end for end (i.e., byte 15 from the file becomes byte 0 in my array) and that didn't work either.
I know that if I were to read the little-endian float into the big-endian float type (float or double) that the format is pretty much lost (from little I understand about how floating point values are stored in memory).
So, what I need is a way to read in a series of little-endian floating point values (64-bit and 32-bit) into a big-endian array of floating point values.
Anyone have any ideas on how to do this? Any help would be much appreciated.

A 64-bit double is represented by the sign bit, an 11-bit (biased) exponent
followed by a 52-bit mantissa. Both x86 and SPARC use the exact same
representation for 64-bit double. The only difference is the endianness
when stored to memory, as you observed.
A 32-bit float is represented by the sign bit, an 8-bit (biased) exponent
followed by a 23-bit mantissa. Again, both x86 and SPARC use the exact
same representation for 32-bit float modulo endianness.
As you can see, a 64-bit double is not merely a pair of 32-bit float.
You need to know exactly how the floating-point data was written:
if a 32-bit float was written, you must endian-swap it as a 32-bit float;
if a 64-bit double was written, you must endian-swap it as a 64-bit double.

Confusing Performance Results--64-Bit and 32-Bit Geekbench Results

I don't understand all of my results for the performance tests mentioned in my subject. Can anyone help me understand what is going on?
I posted the results given below in an earlier thread. I don't think "we" had quite as good an understanding of the 32-bit kernel mode, the 64-bit kernel mode, and related topics back then. So, I am revisiting my results and looking for explanations. My results contradict some of the things we tend to say.
I have both Geekbench 32-bit and 64-bit. So, I made four quick benchmark passes. The Geekbenck scores from my four passes are given below. Note that the Geekbench programs are Mac universal. That is, they are made to run on both Intels and PowerPCs and apparently having started up in either the 32-bit or the 64-bit kernel mode. In general, such programs are not designed to run as either 32-bit or 64-bit. Doing so is not the same thing as simply running having started up in either the 32-bit or the 64-bit kernel mode)
64-bit SL/64-bit Geekbench--4,263
64-bit SL/32-bit Geekbench--3,910
32-bit SL/64-bit Geekbench--4,159
32-bit SL/32-bit Geekbench--3,809
These results suggest that:
1. 64-bit programs are faster than 32-bit programs whether run in 64-bit or 32-bit mode (sort of understandable--Incremental RAM is available under 64-bit mode, but should the difference be this large?);
2. There is a performance penalty for running 64-bit programs in 32-bit mode (not understandable--64 bit programs are supposed to run essentially the same whether run under the 32-bit kernel or the 64-bit kernel); and
3. 32-bit programs run faster in 64-bit mode than in 32-bit mode (not understandable--32 bit programs are supposed to run essentially the same whether run under the 32-bit kernel or the 64-bit kernel).
Message was edited by: donv (The Ghost)

R C-R wrote:
donv (The Ghost) wrote:
There does appear to be sensitivity to the kernel mode environment. Thus, there is some chance that we are overstating the case for starting in 32-bit mode not making a performance difference.
Who is "we" in this?
I didn't take names, ranks, and serial numbers.
but it isn't as simple as one kernel outperforming the other. There are (fairly) well known tradeoffs in using the 64-bit kernel ("K64" in Apple jargon), the most significant of which for most users being loss of 32-bit driver support. There are also some concerns about the stability of the combination of available 64-bit drivers (including Apple's) & K64 on some of the >Macs that Apple "artificially" excludes from booting with K64.
Right, but these things are not pertinent to my tests. But, "we" also say those things.
I don't think anybody understands it all (I certainly don't!) but that's the >point: there really is no "we" in this.
As said, I didn't take names, ranks, and serial numbers of the "we" I referred to--those maintaining that there should not be performance differences of the types I have found and emphasized if 2 and 3 above.
Regarding your GeekBench results in particular, I'm still not sure what you find contradictory about them. 64 bit apps are more efficient than 32 bit ones. The 64 bit CPU instructions available with K64 are much more efficient at some > >things than their 32 bit counterparts.
OK, so then we should expect the sorts of performance differences I found, right? And, you agree that the performances differences I am emphasizing make sense, right? And, you would also agree that, barring need to use apps that won't run in 64-bit mode, those seeking maximum performance should start in 64-bit mode, right? You must not have been part of the original "we." But, now, you, I, and apparently others belong to a different "we"--the "we" that knows that such performance differences should be expected in the context of certain tasks (i.e., the important class of memory and CPU intensive tasks emphasized by Geekbench).
Because GeekBench isolates CPU & memory performance, it is going to be very sensitive to this. But that doesn't mean anyone should expect to see similar results for a practical application or base the choice (if they have it) of >using K64 with their Macs on this or any other benchmark results.
Right on the first sentence, but, importantly, my test isolates bit environment. Otherwise, can't we just stick with the issues raised in my post. I have never claimed we should expect or do the things you mentioned at this time. Further testing of apps and tasks, however, might imply the opposite. But, in general, you are battling mightily against a strawman that doesn't resemble me. I have acknowledged the issues you raise, in effect, as far back as my first post--not in your exact words, but at least implied.
IOW, one size does not fit all.
Why preach to the choir?
Message was edited by: donv (The Ghost)

Execute both 32-bit and 64-bit external procedures within same DB

Hi,
I have a 64-bit installation of oracle9i.
I want to know if it is possible to execute both 32-bit and 64-bit external procedures within the same database. If yes, can you please help on how I can do it?

Thanks. The reason I was thinking of doing this is we have a lot of existing apps which are already configured for a particular name. We are moving to a 64-bit OS and have found that some apps must remain 32-bit while others must be upgraded
to 64-bit (all related to 3rd party code availability). There are a lot of config files (because of a lot of apps on multiple servers). So either bite the bullet and update all the configs to use new names or "cheat" and have both 32 and 64 bit
DSNs use the same name.

32 bit and 64 bit kernel modes

Just curious to know if users experienced the exact same problem in both these modes.

1. Fresh install of OSX 10.6 running in both 32-bit and 64-bit kernel modes.
How did you get your data back onto the fresh install? If you used Migration Assistant, you probably imported the problem (likely caused by some corrupt settings file somewhere) right back into your fresh install.
OTOH, if it happens on a clean system, you may have some kind of hardware issue, though I can't imagine what kind of hardware issue would only affect QuickLook! Perhaps zap your PRAM? (Restart and hold command-option-P-R until you hear a second startup chime.)
2. Deleting ~/Library/Preferences/com.apple.QuickLookDaemon.plist .
Good thought. You may also want to try trashing:
/System/Library/LaunchAgents/com.apple.quicklook.plist
3. Repairing partitions from both Disk Utility and Install DVD.
Do you mean repair permissions? If so, you shouldn't repair permissions while booted from the install disk. You should always do this using the copy of Disk Utility on your hard drive, while booted from your hard drive as you normally would be.
OTOH, repairing the hard drive can only be done on the boot drive while booted from the install disk.
4. Using the following applications to run all tasks: MainMenu & OnyX.
What tasks? Regardless, this is probably unnecessary:
[Five Mac Maintenance Myths|http://www.macworld.com/article/133684/2008/06/maintenance_intro.html]
5. Uninstalling Perian and reinstalling.
Is QuickLook only failing on videos, or is it failing for all types of files? Did you make sure you've got the latest version of Perian?

Creation of Add-on package for 64 bit and 32 bit SAP Business One Client

Please help me creating package for 64 bit and 32 bit SAP Business One. If Add-on executable is compiled with x86 option then there is no issue of connecting Add-on with 32 bit SAP Business one and if Add-on executable is compiled with Any CPU option then there is no issue of connecting Add-on with 64 bit SAP Business one. Problems are mentioned as below
1. My Add-on uses MS ACCESS connection and the connection is read using Jet OLEDB 4.0 provider. It works fine for x86 compile mode but not when compile mode is Any CPU. I searched for the issue on Google and found a solution to change MS ACCESS connection provider to ACE.OLEDB.12.0 but again ACE provider is installed according to the Office version i.e. 32 bit or 64 bit office suite. If I install 32 bit ACE provider then Add-on executable compiled with x86 version is working fine but with Any CPU option throws error as provider is not registered on current machine.
2. Secodly, our license validation activex dll is build using vb 6.0 and therefore when Add-on executable is compiled using Any CPU option, Add-on EXE cannot read from license dll. Any suggestion, how the activeX dll can be compiled whose component can be created from for X86 compiled exe and any cpu compiled exe.
Please help because we are stuck in this issue and cannot move forward.
Thanks.

Hi Alejandro,
That is one solution but did your add on used ms access connection? if you used Jet oledb to connection string or ace oledb connection string? what if 32 bit office is installed and what if 64 office is installed? how did you found the office version in install script? after determining the office version how did you installed Microsoft redistributable for ace oledb (32 bit or 64 bi )?
I am sorry that I asked many questions but these are the problems where I am stuck with the addon installer?
Thanks

What is difference between 32 bit and 64 bit sql server memory management

What is difference between 32 bit and 64 bit sql server memory management
Thanks
Shashikala

This is the basic difference...check if helps:
A 32-bit CPU running 32-bit software (also known as the x86 platform) is so named because it is based on an architecture that can manipulate values that are up to 32 bits in length. This means that a 32-bit memory pointer can store a value between 0 and
4,294,967,295 to reference a memory address. This equates to a maximum addressable space of 4GB on 32-bit platforms
On the other hand 64-bit limit of 18,446,744,073,709,551,616, this number is so large that in memory/storage terminology it equates to 16 exabytes. You don’t come across that term very often, so to help understand the scale, here is the value converted to
more commonly used measurements: 16 exabytes = 16,777,216 petabytes (16 million PB)➤ 17,179,869,184 terabytes (17 billion TB)➤ 17,592,186,044,416 gigabytes (17 trillion GB)➤
As you can see, it is signiﬁcantly larger than the 4GB virtual address space usable in 32-bit systems; it’s so large in fact that any hardware capable of using it all is sadly restricted to the realm of science ﬁction. Because of this, processor manufacturers
decided to only implement a 44-bit address bus, which provides a virtual address space on 64-bit systems of 16TB. This was regarded as being more than enough address space for the foreseeable future and logically it’s split into an 8TB range for user mode
and 8TB for kernel mode. Each 64-bit process running on an x64 platform will be able to address up to 8TB of VAS.
Please click the Mark as answer button and vote as helpful if this reply solves your problem

Best practice for managing a Windows 7 deployment with both 32-bit and 64-bit?

What is the best practice for creating and organizing deployment shares in MDT for a Windows 7 deployment that has mostly 32-bit computers, but a few 64-bit computers as well? Is it better to create a single deployment share for Windows 7 and include both
versions, or is it better to create two separate deployment shares? And what about 32-bit and 64-bit versions of applications?
I'm currently leaning towards creating two separate deployment shares, just so that I don't have to keep typing (x86) and (x64) for every application I import, as well as making it easier when choosing applications in the Lite Touch installation. But I know
each deployment share has the option to create both an x86 and x64 boot image, so that's why I am confused.

Supporting two task sequences is way easier than supporting two shares. Two shares means two boot media, or maintaining a method of directing the user to one or the other. Everything needs to be imported or configured twice. Not to mention doubling storage
space. MDT is designed to have multiple task sequences, why wouldn't you use them?
Supporting multiple task sequences can be a pain, but not bad once you get a system. Supporting app installs intelligently is a large part of that. We have one folder per app install, with a wrapper vbscript that handles OS detection. If there are separate
binaries, they are placed in x86 and x64 subfolders. Everything runs from one folder via the same command, "cscript install.vbs". So, import once, assign once, and forget it. Its the same install package we use for Altiris, and we'll be using a Powershell
version of it when we fully migrate to SCCM.
Others handle x86 and x64 apps separately, and use the MDT app details to select what platform the app is meant for. I've done that, but we have a template for the vbscript wrapper and its a standard process, I believe its easier. YMMV.
Once you get your apps into MDT, create bundles. Core build bundle, core deploy bundle, Laptop deploy bundle, etcetera. Now you don't have to assign twenty apps to both task sequences, just one bundle. When you replace one app in the bundle, all TS'es are
updated automatically. Its kind of the same mentality as active directory. Users, groups and resources = apps, bundles and task sequences.
If you have separate build and deploy shares in your lab, great. If not, separate your apps into build and deploy folders in your lab MDT share. Use a selection profile to upload only your deploy side to production. In fact I separate everything (except
drivers) into Build and deploy folders on my lab server. Don't mix build and deploy, and don't mix Lab/QA and production. I also keep a "Retired" folder. When I replace an app, TS, OS, etcetera, I move it to the retired folder and append "RETIRED - " to the
front of it so I can instantly spot it if it happens to show up somewhere it shouldn't.
To me, the biggest "weakness" of MDT is its flexibility. There's literally a dozen different ways to do everything, and there's no fences to keep you on the path. If you don't create some sort of organization for yourself, its very easy to get lost as things
get complicated. Tossing everything into one giant bucket will have you pulling your hair out.

Smart View 11.1.2.5 with Office 32 Bit and 64 Bit

Hello,
Does anyone know if it's possible to install Smart View 11.1.2.5.210 on MS Office 2013 32 Bit and MS Excel 2013 64 Bit on the same machine? We have users that have both Office 2013 32 Bit and Excel 2013 64 Bit installed. It seems like when we run the SmartView.exe it is looking for the full Office 2013 64 Bit suite and it won't install for just Excel 2013 64 Bit. I'm not sure if it's an issue having both 32 bit and 64 bit or if it's because we don't have the full 64 bit Office suite installed.
Thanks!

It does not look for the full Office suit.
Do you have Office 32-bit and Office 64-bit installed on the same machine?
Thanks

Is there any difference running W7Pro 64 bit and 32 bit for Adobe Acorbat 9 Pro Extended

My primary system runs Windows 7 Pro 64 bit system. My other system runs a 32 bit system. I would like to buy Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro Extended. Is there any difference with running it on either systems? Or will one version work on both the 64 bit and 32 bit systems.

It would work on both systems, but you no longer can buy Acrobat 9...
Mylenium

Dual disk usage, 32 bit and 64 bit

Heres what I have. I bought a dual disk Windows 7. One disk is 32 bit the other 64 bit. I have the 64 bit (disk-1), on my desktop and all is well. I have a laptop with windows Vista, it's a proprietary computer, an Acer. What I want to find
out is can I install The Windows 7 -32 bit (disk-2) on my laptop, and run the 64 bit on my desktop. Is it legal to do this over top of the Vista 32 bit laptop.
Thank you,
Steve

No, it's not legal to use a single license in two different PCs at the same time. A product key is considered as a license. Even though two disk are provided, only a single product key will be provided, meaning, only one license but can be used with different
architectures.Two disks are provided for 32-bit and 64-bit architectures. These two releases can be used in a single PC only, and can even be at the same time as dual boot, but not in two different PCs.
Balaji Kundalam

Separate GPO for 32-bit and 64-bit machines?

Before I give myself a whole load of work wanted to confirm this either way...
We're imaging both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows 7 this summer (x86 for app compatibility and x64 for Adobe CS6 etc). So far I've made a full working policy for x86 but now need to do x64.
When I created the initial policy on a 32-bit machine the ZCM console automatically seems to add a requirement of Architecture = 32-bit which suggests the policy can only be used on that version of the OS - do I need to create a separate x64 policy from scratch or can the x86 GPO be applied (and work consistently and be supported) on the x64 machines?

Yes unfortunately you have to create your policies with the bit version of
the OS. So you have to do it with a 32bit and 64bit machine.
"gshaw0" wrote in message news:[email protected]..
Before I give myself a whole load of work wanted to confirm this either
way...
We're imaging both 32-bit and 64-bit Windows 7 this summer (x86 for app
compatibility and x64 for Adobe CS6 etc). So far I've made a full
working policy for x86 but now need to do x64.
When I created the initial policy on a 32-bit machine the ZCM console
automatically seems to add a requirement of Architecture = 32-bit which
suggests the policy can only be used on that version of the OS - do I
need to create a separate x64 policy from scratch or can the x86 GPO be
applied (and work consistently and be supported) on the x64 machines?
gshaw0
gshaw0's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=135427
View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=467454

Combining 16-bit and 24-bit files in Waveburner

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for