CommandButton21 is created instead of CommandButton1

Hello everybody,
whenever I create a new Excel file on my main system (Win8.1 64bit, Excel 2010 32bit) and create a command button in a sheet, the command button is named CommandButton21 and if I double click the button the event code "CommandButton21_Click" is
created and works well.
The same happens on virtual machines (Win8.1 64bit, Excel 2013 64bit // Win7 64bit, Excel 2010 32 bit).
But some machines (Windows Vista 32bit, Excel 2007 32bit // WinXP, Excel 2002) shows the "usual" behavior and create a "CommandButton1".
Where is the "switch" to get the "usual" behavior back on my main machine?
Andreas.

Hi Andreas,
You'll have to wait for an update that is still being tested. The issue is due
to the December ActiveX update that is causing so much havoc.
Regards, Jan Karel Pieterse|Excel MVP|http://www.jkp-ads.com

Similar Messages

Dependent reservation created instead of planned order

Hello Experts,
After MRP run for some material only dependent reservation created instead of planned order?
What would be the problem?

Stocks must be available on date of requirement.

Purchase Requisitions created instead of Schedule lines

Hi Experts,
When I run MRP for materials with mrp type as PD, MRP creates Purchase Requisitions instead of Schedule lines
I have Scheduling agreement in place.
Kindly let me know what could be the possible reasons for this
Thanks & regards,
Shashidhar

Hi
While running the MRP, Check the input parametrs.
Check the MRP control Parametrs
Delivery schedules - ensure that Schedule lines has been created.
Check it out.
Raman

Is it possible to change proxy settings for all profiles that´s created instead of the standard options. We need to change "use systems proxy" into "automatic"

Proxy Problems
We need to be able to change the default settings for the proxy for all profiles on our computers that´s created for new users.
Standard is that firefox takes the option "use the system options" for the proxy. We would like it to use the option "automatic" instead like IE and Chrome does.
Considering that we have over 500 computers doing this manually isn´t an option, because a new profile is created everytime someone logs on to a computer they haven´t used before.

You can use a mozilla.cfg file in the Firefox program folder to lock prefs or specify new default values.
Place a file local-settings.js in the defaultspref folder where you also find the file channel-prefs.js to specify using mozilla.cfg.
pref("general.config.filename", "mozilla.cfg");
pref("general.config.obscure_value", 0); // use this to disable the byte-shift
See:
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Locking_preferences
You can use these functions in mozilla.cfg:
defaultPref(); // set new default value
pref(); // set pref, but allow changes in current session
lockPref(); // lock pref, disallow changes
This will work for all existing and newly created profiles.

A confirmation of service is created instead of GR goods receipt inb. deliv

Dear Experts,
When I post an inbound delivery created for a PO item with confirmation control (0004) - Shipping notification, No material document is created. In the document flow I see Completion of service is created and no PO History Update follows.
When I try the same inbound delivery posting for a PO items which has 0001 (Confirmations) as confirmation control, the Material Document is created and PO history is updated too.
Do you know where I can alter the setting to create GR posting instead of Confirmation of Service for PO items with 0004-Shipping notification (Inbound delivery) confirmation control?
Thank you very much!
regards,
Shoira

hi dear all
Really thanks for your prompt reply.
i solved this issue, as what u said, it is not released in IW31, at the time of PR creation. So i asked the User to go to IW32 anc choose the apprpriate order and change mode and click on Flag Icon to release.
Any way i awarded points for your support
Thanks
regards
Guru

SDMI is being created instead of SDMJ

i am doing implementation project in Solution Manager, i have activated ChaRM for the project.
when i create a change request with subject "Development(Implementation) " it creates type SDMI request instead of SDMJ.
As far as i know Development(Implementation) is same as Normal Correction and it should create SDMJ type request, shouldnt it??
Please help

Hi Sindra,
When you select Development (Implementation) in the subject field a SDMJ should be created, and if you select Normal Correction (Maintenance) then a SDMI will be created, or if you select Development Activity Template then a SDMI will be created.
You can check the settings in SPRO -> Scenario Specific Settings -> Change Request Management -> Extended Configuration -> Change Transaction -> Change Transaction Types -> Copy Control -> Define Mapping Rules for Copy Controls. In the table displayed you can see the Subject Value that triggers the follow on document.
Hope this helps,
Rich Labib

New HttpSession always created instead of re-used

Hi,
          I've noticed there are a lot of questions about the use of HttpSessions
          in WL 5.1 and
          I'm also having problems.
          I have a servlet that is creating an HttpSession like this;
          HttpSession session = request.getSession(true);
          The first time I call this servlet it creates a new session - however in
          this servlet's
          page I allow the user to look at what is contained in their session
          object (their envelope
          of shopping items). Every time the user invokes the servlet again by
          selecting their
          'envelope' instead of looking in their current session object a new one
          is created.
          Therefore I can't maintain state of the servlet containing the envelope
          items.
          It sounds like other folks are having this problem as well. My servlet
          is in a web application.
          My weblogic.properties file has these entries;
          weblogic.httpd.session.enable=true
          weblogic.httpd.session.persistence=false
          // I've tried it with persistence=true also
          The problems with sessions occurs on both Netscape and IE although both
          of them
          have cookies enabled.
          Any ideas what the problem is? Is there some setting in
          weblogic.properties I need to
          add to get sessions to be persistent between servlet invocations?
          Thanks,
          Susan Cline
          [email protected]


And does the servlet which is run from the envelope use getSession( true )?
          or getSession( false )?
          If you're using true all the time, you're destroying the session.
          "Susan Cline" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          news:[email protected]...
          > Hi,
          >
          > I've noticed there are a lot of questions about the use of HttpSessions
          > in WL 5.1 and
          > I'm also having problems.
          >
          > I have a servlet that is creating an HttpSession like this;
          >
          > HttpSession session = request.getSession(true);
          >
          > The first time I call this servlet it creates a new session - however in
          > this servlet's
          > page I allow the user to look at what is contained in their session
          > object (their envelope
          > of shopping items). Every time the user invokes the servlet again by
          > selecting their
          > 'envelope' instead of looking in their current session object a new one
          > is created.
          > Therefore I can't maintain state of the servlet containing the envelope
          > items.
          >
          > It sounds like other folks are having this problem as well. My servlet
          > is in a web application.
          > My weblogic.properties file has these entries;
          >
          > weblogic.httpd.session.enable=true
          > weblogic.httpd.session.persistence=false
          > // I've tried it with persistence=true also
          >
          > The problems with sessions occurs on both Netscape and IE although both
          > of them
          > have cookies enabled.
          >
          > Any ideas what the problem is? Is there some setting in
          > weblogic.properties I need to
          > add to get sessions to be persistent between servlet invocations?
          >
          > Thanks,
          >
          > Susan Cline
          > [email protected]
          >

Using MD42 purchase requisitions creating instead of schedule lines

Hi PP Guru's
Can any one help while using MD42/MD43 purchase requisitions generating instead of schedule lines.
MRP Type :M0
what are the required settings for this..?
please help me to solve this issue.

Hello
This is a link to a note and you need to have access to SAP service marketplace.
Please ask your system admin/basis and he will be able to provide you an user.
The following information from the note should be relevant for you:
If the flag "SC Vendor" is checked on the scheduling agreement, this source list entry will only be considered on a third-party order processing scenario with MRP areas.
If you are not using MRP areas, this source list entry will not be considered and the vendor/schedule agreement will not be selected. This setting can be found on transaction ME32, on the menu path "ITEM" - "MORE FUNCTIONS" - "DELIVERY ADDRESS". See note 214298 for more details.
BR
Caetano

Have a Mini with "Default User" account. Can an admin account be created instead of using that?

I purchased an Early 2009 Mini on eBay. The seller reinstalled Leopard on it (that's what it came with) after erasing his stuff on it. He put "Default User" as the user name, but no password. He said for security that I should make an account with a password.
When I upgraded to Snow Leopard, I thought it would have an option to create a user name and password. It didn't. Can I make up another user account as the administration account; then use a third user account for documents, pics, etc. (not to disturb the admin account) and forget using the "Default User" account?
I really hate to take the time to erase and reinstall Leopard and Snow Leopard just to remove the "Default User" account.
Thanks.
silverado93

In order to create another account the account you are using needs to have admin privileges. Does it? If so you unlock the Accounts prefpane by clicking the lock in the lower left and entering the admin password (hence the reason the account you're using needs to be an administrator). Then you can create other accounts and click the checkbox for an account that says "Allow user to administer this computer".
Not you can change the admin password for an account by using booting from your installer disk.
Now having said all that are you currently in a state where you have a single account that is not an admin account?

PO created instead posting block set & vendor not extended to company code!

Dear friends,
I have a vendor created for a purchasing organisation in a company code. there are two problems that i am facing.
1) I have blocked a particular vendor completely. Even then system is allowing to create the PO using this vendor.
2) This vendor has been created for a particular company code & has not been extended to another company code. Even then it is allowing to create the PO using the vendor centrally blocked for creating purchase order in another company code.
There is a service PR specifying this vendor as desired vendor & the vendor is ticked for auto PO. Could this be a problem? but i think even then it should not allow to create PO that too for a different company code.
Thanks & Regards
Tasleem Arif

1) I have blocked a particular vendor completely. Even then system is allowing to create the PO using this vendor.
Answer: While creation Purchase order, purchase orgnization mandatory for vendor, if vendor blocked at company code level means system will not check Company code at the time of PO creation. here in PO creation use of company code is to recognise Currency of the company code.
2) This vendor has been created for a particular company code & has not been extended to another company code. Even then it is allowing to create the PO using the vendor centrally blocked for creating purchase order in another company code.
Answer: While creation of Purchase order, Comapny code is used for only currency recognisation , system will not check vendor is created for comapny code or not? but vendor should at Purchase org level.
If vendor is not defined at company code , then it will give an error at the time of invoice only. not at PO level.
At PO level Purchase orgnisation is very important
Regards
Mahesh Naik.

Invoice is getting created instead of Credit Memo in EBP

Hi all,
when we post credit memo in ASN & it comes in EBP sytem is picking transaction in as INV i.e. invoice instead of credit memo.
And also with status ''To be corrected".
Please let me know how can correct it.
Regards,
Neelima

pl see whether you can get any relevant info at
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/67/6e9746608221499322c93a03ffaf4e/content.htm
BR
Dinesh

Request is created instead of trip(Travel Workflow)

Hello All,
I am facing a problem in Travel workflow, after LCP upgrade,when a trip is created it is being created as a request.
Where should i look to resolve this.
Any suggesstions will be appreciated.
Thanks
Harsh

go to swe2 T-code and associate BO to Workflow for trigger that
or
just go to ur Workflow (WS20000040) using SWDD T-Code then go for Workflow start step and make start event for BO
like for trip BO is "BUS2089" and event is "CREATED"
save and activate Workflow than it will got trigger for creating trip.
Thanks & reared
Diwakar Chaube

'Date created' instead of EXIF date getting used for batch naming/folders?

I've noticed that Aperture is using the file creation date as opposed to EXIF date/time info when it imports my photos. Camera is a Nikon D200. Images are .NEF files.
If I allow Aperture to apply new master file names, based on Image Date - Image Time, it uses the Mac's file creation date (whenever the file was copied to the machine) as opposed to using the EXIF date and time.
I've already filed a bug with apple, but wanted to put it up here as well to see if others were having the same experiences.

Hello,
I use exiftool to modify the Creation and Modification time of the files. After that I use LR "Ajust time" feature to set the time of the movies in LR to the file creation time (last point). This works fine for me.
For MOV (Quicktime):
exiftool "-FileModifyDate<TrackCreateDate" "-FileCreateDate<TrackCreateDate"
For AVI:
exiftool "-FileModifyDate<DateTimeOriginal" "-FileCreateDate<DateTimeOriginal" *.avi
Depnding on your camera (and container format mov, avi) you may also ajust the time zone, e.g.
exiftool -FileModifyDate+=1 -FileCreateDate+=1 -if "$CameraModelName =~ /EOS 600D/i" *.mov
Which time in the container (MOV, AVI) you use as source, depends on your workflow. I edit my mov files before import. Therfore "CreateDate" is the time when I edited the file. Quicktime and (some) avi file contain a time when the containing stream was created. I use this vaule as source.
exiftool <filename> gives you detailed information about all available times.

Why Normal PR is created instead of blanket?

Hi,
I have tried blanket purchase for 2 items, successfully done for min-max item but for MRP item system has generated normal PR instead of blanket release.Please help!!!
Regards,
NSC

82f260b3-f5e3-4eb6-b4f5-6d51081c38f4 wrote:
Hi,
I have tried blanket purchase for 2 items, successfully done for min-max item but for MRP item system has generated normal PR instead of blanket release.Please help!!!
You won't get any help here as you have posted this in the wrong forum. This is the APEX forum, and the question clearly has nothing to do with APEX.

Credit Memo is getting created instead of Invoice in EBP

when we post invoice in SUS & it comes in EBP sytem is picking transaction in as CRME i.e. credit memo instead of INV invoice.

HI
We are also facing same problem.
When u are posting invoice in SUS everthing is fine, but when it comes to EBP, it is picking transaction type CRME...instead of INV...
What is missing
Regards,
NNK

CommandButton21 is created instead of CommandButton1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for