Commit per session

hi guru's
i have one little question
which v$view can tell us " how many commits done by user x in particular session" ????
thanks for response

- show the user commits by frequency
SELECT SID, VALUE
FROM v$sesstat
WHERE statistic# = (SELECT statistic#
FROM v$statname
WHERE NAME = 'user commits')
ORDER BY VALUE DESC;
Hope it helps.
Regards
Asif Kabir

Similar Messages

Lion 10.7.2 On both mac book pro and iMac, both with Lion 10.7.2, obtain repeated iCal event notifications from calendar or address book. Cannot turn these off. They repeat several times per session and every time computer is used. How to diagnose this

Lion 10.7.2 On both mac book pro and iMac, both with Lion 10.7.2, obtain repeated iCal event notifications from calendar or address book. Cannot turn these off. They repeat several times per session and every time computer is used. How to diagnose this?

First, uninstall "SuperTV" (whatever that is) according to the developer's instructions. It isn't working and it's filling the log with noise.
If you have more than one user account, these instructions must be carried out as an administrator.
Launch the Console application.
Step 1
Make sure the title of the Console window is All Messages. If it isn't, select All Messages from the SYSTEM LOG QUERIES menu on the left.
Enter "BOOT_TIME" (without the quotes) in the search box. Note the timestamps of those log messages, which refer to the times when the system was booted. Now clear the search box and scroll back in the log to the last boot time when you had the problem. Post the messages logged before the boot, while the system was unresponsive or was failing to shut down. Please include the BOOT_TIME message at the end of the log extract.
Post the log text, please, not a screenshot. If there are runs of repeated messages, post only one example of each. Don’t post many repetitions of the same message. When posting a log extract, be selective. In most cases, a few dozen lines are more than enough.
PLEASE DO NOT INDISCRIMINATELY DUMP THOUSANDS OF LINES FROM THE LOG INTO A MESSAGE. If you do that, I will not respond.
Important: Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Edit it out by search-and-replace in a text editor before posting.
Step 2
Still in Console, look under System Diagnostic Reports for crash or panic logs, and post the most recent one, if any. In the interest of privacy, I suggest you edit out the “Anonymous UUID,” a long string of letters, numbers, and dashes in the header of the report, if present (it may not be.) Please don’t post shutdownStall, spin, or hang logs — they're very long and not helpful.

Windows 8.1 MDM not responding to more than one SyncML from MDM server per session

Here is the behaviour i see, which was not expected by Windows 8.1.
1) Device is enrolled
2) Client initiates the connection with the MDM server defined in provisioning XML during enrollment.
3) MDM Server sends some commands as a SyncML response.
4) Client accepts the commands and sends Status and results.
5) Again MDM Server sends some commands as a SyncML response.
6) Client doesn't respond to these commands or not sending any SyncML. Here is the problem that i am referring to.
We are capturing the traffic in fiddler and found that device is not sending the next request where we are expecting the status for these commands.
The same is being repeated in all the requests client initiates. DM Client responds back only for one syncML sent by the MDM server per session.
Is this the expected behaviour with Windows 8.1? Or are we doing something wrong to see this behaviour?
Below is the SyncML for which I am expecting the response from the DM client. (Note: I got the response for the same SyncML in the first connection, but not in the second.)
<SyncML xml:lang="en" xmlns="syncml:SYNCML1.2">
<SyncHdr>
<VerDTD>1.2</VerDTD>
<VerProto>DM/1.2</VerProto>
<SessionID>1</SessionID>
<MsgID>1</MsgID>
<Target>
<LocURI>0</LocURI>
</Target>
<Source>
<LocURI>https://####</LocURI>
<LocName>AfariaWinPhoneProvider</LocName>
</Source>
<RespURI>https://####</RespURI>
</SyncHdr>
<SyncBody>
<Status>
<CmdID>1</CmdID>
<MsgRef>2</MsgRef>
<CmdRef>0</CmdRef>
<Cmd>SyncHdr</Cmd>
<TargetRef>https://####</TargetRef>
<SourceRef>0</SourceRef>
<Data>200</Data>
</Status>
<Get>
<CmdID>2</CmdID>
<Item>
<Target>
<LocURI>./cimv2/Win32_ComputerSystemProduct</LocURI>
</Target>
</Item>
</Get>
<Final />
</SyncBody>
</SyncML>

Hello Sreekanth,
I am facing similar issue, here is the behaviour description:
1) Device is enrolled
2) Client initiates the connection with the MDM server defined in provisioning XML during enrollment.
3) MDM Server sends some commands as a SyncML response.
4) Client doesn't respond to these commands or not sending any SyncML.
The same is being repeated in all client request.
Below is the SyncML
for which I am expecting the response from the DM client:
<SyncML xmlns="SYNCML:SYNCML1.2">
<SyncHdr>
<VerDTD>1.2</VerDTD>
<VerProto>DM/1.2</VerProto>
<SessionID>1</SessionID>
<MsgID>1</MsgID>
<Target>
<LocURI>9302116</LocURI>
</Target>
<Source>
<LocURI>https://#####</LocURI>
</Source>
</SyncHdr>
<SyncBody>
<Status>
<CmdID>1</CmdID>
<MsgRef>1</MsgRef>
<CmdRef>0</CmdRef>
<Cmd>SyncHdr</Cmd>
<TargetRef>9302116</TargetRef>
<Data>212</Data>
</Status>
<Status>
<CmdID>2</CmdID>
<MsgRef>1</MsgRef>
<CmdRef>2</CmdRef>
<Cmd>Alert</Cmd>
<Data>200</Data>
</Status>
<Status>
<CmdID>3</CmdID>
<MsgRef>1</MsgRef>
<CmdRef>3</CmdRef>
<Cmd>Replace</Cmd>
<TargetRef>./devinf12</TargetRef>
<Data>200</Data>
</Status>
<Get>
<CmdID>75</CmdID>
<Item>
<Target>
<LocURI>./DevDetail/SwV</LocURI>
</Target>
</Item>
</Get>
</SyncBody>
</SyncML>
Here
we had tried sending
<Target>
<LocURI>0</LocURI>
</Target>
But it didn't worked.

Public and Authenticated App with Authorization Scheme once per session

I have a question . . .
Let's say I have an application and at the application level I have an authorization scheme (auth1). If auth1 is set up to evaluate once per session, does it authenticate for the public user, then pass me back to the page and then check then evaluate the auth1 scheme. Or does it evaluate the auth1 scheme, then log in, then return to the page. Is it the same regardless of authentication scheme (e.g. Oracle SSO).
It may make a big difference. If the authorization sheme is based upon the user (most will be) then setting it to evaluate once per session can be a real problem. If it evaluates before the user logs in, then it won't really work.
This is an even bigger question when the application does not have a authorization scheme at the application level and allows public pages. If a page that is not public has an authorization scheme set, and the user goes directly to that page, it seems to authenticate the authorization scheme and then logs you in, but does not re-evaluate authorization scheme after you are logged in. Is this accurate? I realize that I could set it up to evaluate for every page view, but I really only need it once after login.
Is this clear?

Anton,
It seems that all authorization schemes that are set to evaluate once per session are evaluated with the beginning establishment of a session.Sort of correct. Authorization schemes don't get evaluated until the component that uses them is considered for rendering or processing. So if the authorization scheme is attached to a page, it won't fire until the page is requested. If another component uses that scheme first, the evaluation will happen then and will not happen again during the session.
What if I have another page that is not public. If it is the first page I go to, what happens. Obviously, I get redirected to login, then login. Do the authorization schemes get evaluated at this point?Yes, assuming the authorization scheme is used by the page, the scheme is evaluated during the first rendering or processing of the page in the session, after the authentication step.
Now, what if I have a page that is public, but also has an auth scheme (odd, but could happen). Now what happens, does the auth scheme get evaluated before or after login?During the rendering or processing of the page after the authentication step. For a public page, the authentication step is performed up to the point where it determines that no authentication is required.
OK, now let's add in Application level auth scheme. I can have public or private pages. If I go to a private page, when does the app level auth scheme kick in? How about for a public page?When an application uses an authorization scheme, it gets evaluated before the authorization scheme (if any) for the page that is being requested, so the public/private property of the page doesn't matter.
General advice: when an authorization scheme uses :APP_USER, it doesn't work well to have it fire once per session because it'll get run before authentication to the application occurs, which sets APP_USER. You can have such schemes fire once per page view and for PL/SQL function-type schemes, have them give a "pass" when the current page is the login page, that kind of thing.
In addition, if the overhead of running a scheme is high, one can set an application-level item to indicate that a once-per-page scheme has already run satisfactorily. The PL/SQL-type schemes can access the value of such an item to skip the expensive part of the evaluation and return true immediately.
Finally, the htmldb_application.reset_security_check API can be called in order to reset the "fired" status of all authorization schemes in the session, allowing them to be re-evaluated if/when they are encountered again in the session.
Hope this helps,
Scott

Upgraded to Lion, CS3 programs will only let me open 1 photo per session, what gives?

Just upgraded to Lion from Snow Leopard. Now my CS3 Creative Suite programs will only let me open one picture per session. I then have to completely close out of photoshop or illustrator or whatever and reopen to open another picture. Any suggestions before I have to take my computer to the apple store.

http://roaringapps.com/ show some people having problems with various things. Have you tried reinstalling CS3? If that doesn't work, restore from a backup if needed to stay in production until a solution or an upgrade can be worked out.
I'm not sure the Apple Store will troubleshoot 3rd party software that is 3 versions old.

Avg number of open cursors per session

We've been noticing a large number of open cursors open per session in our database, these users being Oracle Forms users. There are quite a few 'bells & whistles' in this vendor-supplied application with many round trips to the database. The warning we were receiving was induced by an alert that we had set up within OEM.
It got me wondering then, what a large number of cursors per process really was. We're seeing between 10-80 open cursors. The init parm OPEN_CURSORS has a default value of 50 upon installation (which is per session), so the max of 80 doesn't seem too much higher.
Are we really experiencing a large # of open cursors per session? Does someone have a means of estimating the max # of cursors that one would expect based upon CPU & memory resources? I can't find anything in the documentation.
Thanks,
Chuck

There is an OPEN_CURSORS parameter in the init.ora file,
I want to know the impact of number of open cursors on performance
(ie., how many open cursors would be appropriate for an instance)There shouldn't be a performance issue here. The value needs to be set based on how many open cursors you want to allow simultaneously. If you set the value too low, applications will get the "too many cursors open" error when they try to open a new cursor. If you're not having problems, or if you don't know how many open cursors you're likely to have, I wouldn't change this parameter.
Justin

Once per session, connected anyway

I have an authentication scheme that is set to once per session. The users are defined in oid and have to logon using sso.
So far so good. But in following scenario it goes wrong.
1. User enters the htmldb url
2. User gets the logon screen from sso
3. User logs in and is than forwarded to the application where the authorisation scheme says him he has no access and he is redirected to a public page that tells him this.
4. the user presses the 'Back' key on the browser, so he gets the login screen again.
5. he enters again his username and password, and enters.
-> now he is logged in and gets the screen he is not allowed to.
What goes wrong here? Why does the session not remember that this user has no access ?
Grtz,
Chris.

Scott,
The solution of htmldb_util.reset_authorizations works fine. But in the end we choose another option.
We are using the error page now to display wether the user has no access to the application. It looks like the user has access to the error pag even if he has no access to any of the application pages. Now it works fine.
Now the authorization also returns false.
Tnx for the replies,
Chris.

Web service request ....one db connection per session OR all share one...

in servlet i use
public void init(ServletConfig config) throws ServletException { }
so it only gets the db connection once per session
now that I am working on a web service....im not sure how to do something similiar
I want to either have all request coming in to use the same ONE connection OR maybe one created per session
I have way too many web service requests and it creates too many jdbc connections....what can i do to pervent this?
I dont care if they have to wait longer;
I just want to cut down the number of jdbc connections to 1 to 2
any help appreciated, thanks

You want to use a connection pool. If you just use one connection, your web users are likely to be waiting on the availabilty of the connection. A pool will let you set whatever maximum you want; 1 or 100...
There are a number of database connection pooling options. One of the morepopular is DBCP, part of the Apache project, which is free and open source.
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/dbcp/
There are other such "drop in" poolers and some database vendors are now supplying connection pooling in their drivers.

Start systemd --user once after first login, not per session?

Hey guys,
So I've been toying around with using systemd to manage user daemons and some oneshot processes, it seems like it could be really nice
Here's what I'm thinking I would like to do:
I would have two user targets, `console.target` and `graphical.target`.
The console target will start things like pulseaudio, ssh-agent (envoy), transmission, stuff like that.
The graphical target will start xorg and then other things like the WM, set the wallpaper.. you get the idea. Obviously the graphical target will want the console target.
Now, the part I wanted to get some feedback on is this: I would like a systemd --user instance to only be started once after my first login, not once per session.
So for example, I login from vt1 and it brings systemd --user up to the graphical.target. Then if I later SSH in from somewhere, it won't start a new systemd --user session (Ie, won't start pulse-audio, transmission-daemon, etc).
However, if I haven't logged into my machine yet and I SSH in, it will start up systemd --user and will start the console.target. If I then later login via vt1 it will see that there's already a systemd --user session started and start the graphical.target
Does this make sense? Is it a bad idea?

You could make a column in the database, and when the
information is set (emailed) make the value to be 0, then when they
first register use a IF recodset("column_name") = 0 Then
reponse.redirect("filloutpage.asp") end if, then when they fill out
the info have a hidden form field thats updates the value to 1. on
the login page after the first if make another IF
recordset("column_name") = 1 Then response.redirect("index.asp")
end if.
i have forms that have three different redirect based on user
input, and you could do the same thing you could add the one for
the first time to dw made code, here is an example, you could
change the request.form to a recordset value and it will work.
If Request.Form("select") = "Self" Then
MM_editRedirectUrl = "FridaySchedule.asp"
Response.Redirect(MM_editRedirectUrl)
End IF
If Session("MM_AdminEdit") = "True" Then
MM_editRedirectUrl = "FridayScheduleAdmin.asp"
Response.Redirect(MM_editRedirectUrl)
End IF
MM_editRedirectUrl = "FridayScheduleDept.asp"
If (Request.QueryString <> "") Then
If (InStr(1, MM_editRedirectUrl, "?", vbTextCompare) = 0)
Then
MM_editRedirectUrl = MM_editRedirectUrl & "?" &
Request.QueryString
Else
MM_editRedirectUrl = MM_editRedirectUrl & "&" &
Request.QueryString
End If
End If
Response.Redirect(MM_editRedirectUrl)

I parallelize the use of SQL*Loader.But it always commit per 89 rows

I parallelize the use of SQL*Loader. But it always commit per 89 rows. How can I set Commit Row Number?

enlarge the BINDSIZE= and ROWS= option or better use DIRECT=TRUE
(and no need to parallelize [whatever this is in your case])

Per-session VRF and IPv6

Hello. I cant get Per-session VRF feature working with IPv6 protocol. IPv4 is working fine.
Here is what i've got:
test1 Cleartext-Password := "test"
Framed-Protocol = PPP,
Service-Type == Framed-User,
Cisco-AVPair += "ipv6:delegated-ipv6-pool=ppp_delegate_56_v6_pool_vrf_no_nat",
Cisco-AVPair += "ip:vrf-id=NoNAT",
Cisco-AVPair += "ip:ip-unnumbered=Loopback1",
Cisco-AVPair += "ip:addr-pool=real"
Cisco-AVPair += "ipv6:ipv6-addr-pool=ppp_link_v6_pool_vrf_no_nat"
test2 Cleartext-Password := "test"
Framed-Protocol = PPP,
Service-Type == Framed-User,
Cisco-AVPair += "ipv6:delegated-ipv6-pool=ppp_delegate_56_v6_pool",
Cisco-AVPair += "lcp:interface-config=ip nat inside"
#sho run
interface Loopback0
ip address ****
ipv6 address 2001:DB8::20/128
ipv6 enable
interface Loopback1
vrf forwarding NoNAT
ip address *****
ipv6 address 2001:DB8::21/128
ipv6 enable
ipv6 dhcp pool AAA_dhcpv6_pool
prefix-delegation aaa method-list FREERADIUS
ip local pool pool192_168 192.168.128.0 192.168.255.254
ip local pool real *.*.*.* *.*.*.*
ipv6 local pool ppp_delegate_56_v6_pool 2001:DB8:3::/48 56
ipv6 local pool ppp_link_v6_pool 2001:DB8:1::/49 64
ipv6 local pool ppp_delegate_56_v6_pool_vrf_no_nat 2001:DB8:6::/48 56
ipv6 local pool ppp_link_v6_pool_vrf_no_nat 2001:DB8:4::/49 64
interface Virtual-Template1
ip unnumbered Loopback0
ipv6 unnumbered Loopback0
ipv6 enable
no ipv6 nd ra suppress
ipv6 dhcp server AAA_dhcpv6_pool
peer default ip address pool pool192_168
peer default ipv6 pool ppp_link_v6_pool
! non-related config skipped
User test2 receive IPv4 private address and full IPv6 service: address negotiated on the link and delegation DHCPv6 service.
User test1 receive IPv4 real address only and no IPv6 at all.
Here is the debug, take a look at the bold line:
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS(000000DF): Send Access-Request to 10.0.6.10:1812 id 1645/139, len 207
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: authenticator B8 8A 07 F3 D8 90 A5 FE - B0 10 9F 51 B2 4F 7E 0A
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Framed-Protocol [7] 6 PPP [1]
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: User-Name [1] 6 "test"
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: CHAP-Password [3] 19 *
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: NAS-Port-Type [61] 6 Virtual [5]
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: NAS-Port [5] 6 0
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: NAS-Port-Id [87] 13 "0/1/0/2.301"
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 41
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 35 "client-mac-address=5254.0018.9fb1"
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 39
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 33 "circuit-id-tag=SNR eth 001,0301"
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 39
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 33 "remote-id-tag=f8-f0-82-10-9b-9d"
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Service-Type [6] 6 Framed [2]
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: NAS-IP-Address [4] 6 10.0.6.21
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS(000000DF): Sending a IPv4 Radius Packet
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS(000000DF): Started 5 sec timeout
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Received from id 1645/139 10.0.6.10:1812, Access-Accept, len 236
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: authenticator 9C E6 3B 43 A3 58 06 AB - 17 99 AD 06 FF C6 9A 35
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Framed-Protocol [7] 6 PPP [1]
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Service-Type [6] 6 Framed [2]
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 67
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 61 "ipv6:delegated-ipv6-pool=ppp_delegate_56_v6_pool_vrf_no_nat"
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 23
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 17 "ip:vrf-id=NoNAT"
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 34
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 28 "ip:ip-unnumbered=Loopback1"
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 25
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 19 "ip:addr-pool=real"
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Vendor, Cisco [26] 55
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS: Cisco AVpair [1] 49 "ipv6:ipv6-addr-pool=ppp_link_v6_pool_vrf_no_nat"
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS(000000DF): Received from id 1645/139
Jul 8 10:13:41: ppp202 PPP SSS: Forwarding request
Jul 8 10:13:41: ppp202 PPP: Phase is FORWARDING, Attempting Forward
Jul 8 10:13:41: PPP: Bind ppp202 to Virtual-Access2.1
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 PPP: Static Bind peer_type[3]
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 PPP: Phase is AUTHENTICATING, Authenticated User
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 CHAP: O SUCCESS id 1 len 4
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 PPP: Phase is UP
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: Protocol configured, start CP. state[Initial]
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: Event[OPEN] State[Initial to Starting]
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: O CONFREQ [Starting] id 1 len 10
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: Address *.*.*.8 (0x0306B92EC408)
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: Event[UP] State[Starting to REQsent]
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 PPP: Send Message[Static Bind Response]
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: I CONFREQ [REQsent] id 1 len 22
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: Address 0.0.0.0 (0x030600000000)
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: PrimaryDNS 0.0.0.0 (0x810600000000)
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: SecondaryDNS 0.0.0.0 (0x830600000000)
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP AUTHOR: Start. Her address 0.0.0.0, we want 0.0.0.0
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP AUTHOR: Says use pool real
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP AUTHOR: Pool returned *.*.*.11
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP AUTHOR: Done. Her address 0.0.0.0, we want *.*.*.11
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: O CONFNAK [REQsent] id 1 len 22
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: Address *.*.*.11 (0x0306B92EC50B)
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: PrimaryDNS 8.8.8.8 (0x810608080808)
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: SecondaryDNS 8.8.4.4 (0x830608080404)
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: Event[Receive ConfReq-] State[REQsent to REQsent]
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPV6CP: I CONFREQ [UNKNOWN] id 1 len 14
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPV6CP: Interface-Id 11BF:9891:6F31:7C15 (0x010A11BF98916F317C15)
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 LCP: O PROTREJ [Open] id 2 len 20 protocol IPV6CP (0x0101000E010A11BF98916F317C15)
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: I CONFACK [REQsent] id 1 len 10
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: Address *.*.*.8 (0x0306B92EC408)
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: Event[Receive ConfAck] State[REQsent to ACKrcvd]
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: I CONFREQ [ACKrcvd] id 2 len 22
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: Address *.*.*.11 (0x0306B92EC50B)
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: PrimaryDNS 8.8.8.8 (0x810608080808)
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: SecondaryDNS 8.8.4.4 (0x830608080404)
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: O CONFACK [ACKrcvd] id 2 len 22
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: Address *.*.*.11 (0x0306B92EC50B)
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: PrimaryDNS 8.8.8.8 (0x810608080808)
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: SecondaryDNS 8.8.4.4 (0x830608080404)
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: Event[Receive ConfReq+] State[ACKrcvd to Open]
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: State is Open
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 Added to neighbor route AVL tree: topoid 2, address *.*.*.11
Jul 8 10:13:41: Vi2.1 IPCP: Install route to *.*.*.11
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS/ENCODE(000000DF):Orig. component type = PPPoE
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS(000000DF): Config NAS IP: 10.0.6.21
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS(000000DF): Config NAS IPv6: ::
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS(000000DF): sending
Jul 8 10:13:41: RADIUS(000000DF): Send Accounting-Request to 10.0.6.10:1813 id 1646/109, len 264
Any suggestions?

Fixed one problem and moved into other.
I've added
Cisco-AVPair += "lcp:interface-config=ipv6 unnumbered Loopback1"
to user profile, but stumbled into another problem: router ignores
Cisco-AVPair += "ipv6:ipv6-addr-pool=ppp_link_v6_pool"
regardless of vrf, even on usual user profile

Per Session Maximum Message Limit

I have a front-end messaging server that would need to feed the messages to an Anti Spam System before these messages could be further relayed to their respective destinations/back-end messaging server.
The Anti Spam System has a certain limit in number of messages it could receive/process per session. So, I would like to set a per session limit in the number of messages my front-end messaging server can send to the Anti Spam System in order not to have long queue at the front-end messaging server due to the receiving/processing limit set in the Anti Spam System.
The exact version of my messaging server here is iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21. Please advise on how could I achieve this objective of mine.

Could you please explain the below sentence as stated in SUN documentation? =========================================
If the option accepts an integer value, a base may be specified using notation of the form b%v, where b is the base expressed in base 10 and vb. =========================================
For example, if I would like to set "ATTEMPT_TRANSACTIONS_PER_SESSION" to 15 messages, how do I set it based on the above highlighted sentence from SUN documentation?

Is open_cursors per session or user?

I'm getting a lot of ORA-01000 in error logs on my app servers. 8i documentation states that:
"OPEN_CURSORS determines the maximum number of cursors per user."
but I suspect this is a typo and should be per session, an extremely relavant difference when multiple app servers are connecting to DB w/common username.
does Oracle actually track open cursors across all active sessions for a given username or is it per session like most parameters?

It must be per session,
You can resolve the problem by increasing the parameter to 2500 as it cotrolls maximum allowed.

How do I enable per session cookies?

Would someone be so kind as to instruct me on how to enable per session cookies.
I cannot use one website to its fullest without this.
Thank you,
Leeflea

See [[Enabling and disabling cookies]]

I'm running Firefox 32bit on aWIN7 64bit laptop - Firefox freezes up, usually at high capacity, accumulates something on average of 500,000K to @900,000K average (2+ times per session)

I'm running Firefox 32bit on aWIN7 64bit laptop - Firefox freezes up, usually at high capacity, accumulates something on average of 500,000K to @900,000K average (2+ times per session)

Commit per session

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for