Commitment for a Block Position of PO in CJI5

Hi experts,
Is it possible to display the amount commitment for a Block Position of a Purchase Order in the report CJI5?
Because when I block the item of a PO, the value of commitment become 0; and I want to keep it as before block.
Thanks!

Hello,
maybe the modification note 562211 might be useful for you.
Kind regards,
Dirk

Similar Messages

Commitment for Block Purchase Order - CJI5

Hi experts,
Is it possible to display the amount commitment for a Block Position of a Purchase Order in the report CJI5?
Because when I block the item of a PO, the value of commitment become 0; and I want to keep it as before block.
Thanks!

Hello,
maybe the modification note 562211 might be useful for you.
Kind regards,
Dirk

Problem for releasing blocked sales order on Creditlimit

Hi Gurus,
        I a   hve a problem for releasing blocked sales orders
         what i have done: 1)i have blocked sales order based on exceeded creditlimit
         (i have change SDType in 'OVAK' is 'C')
                  2)now i have to release for furthur processing so i have done following steps
                  3)Goto VKM3/VKM1 T.Code and then release what order that is blocked.
                  4) order will appear in the list.
                  5)Select that one.
                  6)Click on the green flag that appears on the left hand side.
                  7)Click on save.
                  8)click on back it will ask for "Leave list".
                  9)Click on yes.
                  10)It said that Sales orer has been released
Still what my problem is:
Problem: 1)So i'm trying to create deliver for Sales order but it shows an error
         2)"Sales order is blocked for delivery: Credit limits" Even it was released
Plz kindly help me what i do....
Thanks In Advance
sivakumar

sorry   i was unfotunately put this thread here over in SD

Can you change the units used for size and position in layout editor?

Hello,
In Aperture 3.4, does anyone know if you can change the units used for size and position in layout editor? The page is set in inches, but the image size and position are given in centimetres and I would prefer to work all in inches to create custom layouts. I can't see any way to change this. If anyone knows how it would be much appreciated. Thanks!

Aperture uses the unit settings defined in the System Preferences. Set the "Measurement Units" in the "Region" tab of the "Language & Text" preferences to "US"; the Aperture will display the Size & Position in inches, if it is the "Book" layout manager you are asking about.
Merry Christmas!
Léonie

Sales Order Confirmation when sales order goes for Credit Block

want Sales Order to be Confirmed , i e Schedule line Confirmation , when sales order goes for Credit Block
How i can Achieve this?
Even when set for Sales Document typpe credit check as 'D' and credit group as ;03; ie at Goods Issue still order is not getting confirmed.

I am not sure, why you want schedule line to be confirmed for credit blocked sales orders. Re-confirm with the client.
There are controls when defining delivery blocks.
Goto IMG - Log.Execution-Shipping - Deliveries- Define delivery blocks( check menu path in system, may not be same as shown here).
Select 01- credit block " untick" from "Confirmation" Column.
Now test with & see how ti works.
Regards,
Reazuddin MD

Disk Utility: for bad blocks on hard disks, are seven overwrites any more effective than a single pass of zeros?

In this topic I'm not interested in security or data remanence (for such things we can turn to e.g. Wilders Security Forums).
I'm interested solely in best practice approaches to dealing with bad blocks on hard disks.
I read potentially conflicting information. Examples:
… 7-way write (not just zero all, it does NOT do a reliable safe job mapping out bad blocks) …
— https://discussions.apple.com/message/8191915#8191915 (2008-09-29)
… In theory zero all might find weak or bad blocks but there are better tools …
— https://discussions.apple.com/message/11199777#11199777 (2010-03-09)
… substitution will happen on the first re-write with Zeroes. More passes just takes longer.
— https://discussions.apple.com/message/12414270#12414270 (2010-10-12)
For bad block purposes alone I can't imagine seven overwrites being any more effective than a single pass of zeros.
Please, can anyone elaborate?
Anecdotally, I did find that a Disk Utility single pass of zeros seemed to make good (good enough for a particular purpose) a disk that was previously unreliable (a disk drive that had been dropped).

@MrHoffman
As well pointed your answers are, you are not answering the original question, and regarding consumer device hard drives your answers are missleading.
Consumer device hard drives ONLY remap a bad sector on write. That means regardless how many spare capacity the drive has, it will NEVER remap the sector. That means you ALWAYS have a bad file containing a bad sector.
In other words YOU would throw away an otherwise fully functional drive. That might be reasonable in a big enterprise where it is cheaper to replace the drive and let the RAID system take care of it.
However on an iMac or MacBook (Pro) an ordinary user can not replace the drive himself, so on top of the drive costs he has to pay the repair bill (for a drive that likely STILL is in perfect shape, except for the one 'not yet' remaped bad block)
You simply miss the point that the drive can have still one million good reserve blocks, but will never remap the affected block in a particular email or particular song or particular calendar. So as soon as the file affected is READ the machine hangs, all other processes more or less hang at the same moment they try to perform I/O because the process trying to read the bad block is blocking in the kernal. This happens regardless how many free reserve blocks you have, as the bad block never gets reallocated, unless it is written to it. And your email program wont rewrite an email that is 4 years old for you ... because it is not programmed to realize a certain file needs to be rewritten to get rid of a bad block.
@Graham Perrin
You are similar stubborn in not realizing that your original question is awnsered.
A bad block gets remapped on write.
So obviously it happens at the first write.
How do you come to the strange idea that writing several times makes a difference? How do you come to the strange idea that the bytes you write make a difference? Suppose block 1234 is bad. And the blocks 100,000,000 to 100,000,999 are reserve blocks. When you write '********' to block 1234 the hard drive (firmware) will remap it to e.g. 100,000,101. All subsequent writes will go to the same NEW block. So why do you ask if doing it several times will 'improve' this? After all the awnsers here you should have realized: your question makes no sense as soon as you have understood how remapping works (is supposed to work). And no: it does not matter if you write a sequence od zeros, of '0's or of '1's or of 1s or of your social security number or just 'help me I'm hold prisoner in a software forum'.
I would try to find a software that finds which file is affected, then try to read the bad block until you in fact have read it (that works surprisngly often but may take any time from a few mins to hours) ... in other words you need a software that tries to read the file and copies it completely, so even the bad block is read (hopefully) successful. Then write the whole data to a new file and delete the old one (deleting will free the bad block and ar some later time something will be written there and cause a remap).
Writing zeros into the bad block basically only helps if you don't care that the affected file is corrupted afterwards. E.g. in case of a movie the player might crash after trying to display the affected area. E.g. if you know the affected file is a text file, it would make more sense to write a bunch of '-' signs, as they are readable while zero bytes are not (a text file is not supposed to contain zero bytes)
Hope that helped ;)

Regarding Tolerance Keys for Invoice Block For Payment in MIRO

Hi all,
In customizing, I have defined Tolerance Keys for Invoice Block for Payment. I have defined all tolerance keys for my company code ...... with Absolute as well as Percentage Limits. But whenever I am doing MIRO & testing for my Block Codes effectiveness, i am finding that everytime my Invoice gets Blocked by Tolerance Key PP(Price Variance) or by date......but not by any other like BD, BW, KW etc. Can anyone help me as how I should check for this. I even tried to study the documentation part available in customizing, but was unable to understand the term like Order Price Quantity units.......Can anyone help me in understanding this thing ........
Regards.....

Hi Ganesh,
below is the user exit where you can check the tolarance and put the Block according to the your requirment.
User Exit name - MM08R002 -User exit for tolerance checks
in the above user exit you have to use the below Function exit.
1) EXIT_SAPLMRMC_001
2) EXIT_SAPLMRMP_001
we implemented the above user exit to put the payment block based on the checks.
You can find the documentation of the above exit in the system.
Thanks
Naresh

There is still a purchase order commitment for WBS

Hi All,
We need to close whole project while closing I am getting the attached error.
There is still a purchase order commitment for WBS
Additional Information or Comments: = I have checked and closed all purchases order commitment. But still the project shows the below error .
Edited by: nandhasapfi on Sep 22, 2011 10:52 AM

Hello,
This message is being output correctly as the AuC still has
values against it.
These values must be cleared before you can close the WBS element.
Please do a FUL settlement against the WBS element to clear
these values and then try to set the CLSD status again.
There are two ways to 'clean' the AuC, so that you can deactivate it
and close the wbs element:
1. Post a manual retirement of the AuC to clean it.
2. Create a new AuC and use it for all the differences in the final
settlement.
I hope this helps,
regards
Ray

Purchase Requisition commitment for WBS

Hi! PS Gurus!
There is one issue in my support project. While closing one WBS, the system gives an error that u201CThere is still Purchase Requisition commitment for WBSu2026.u201D
But when I checked ME5J, some cost exists at PR. Later on I came to know that Purchase requisition is missing from the system, it has been deleted from the system. The solution I find out from SAP note. Some report we need to upload from basis people, again later on I came to know that the data is not uploadable, the main thing abaper found out that there is no program exists for that particular report.
Plz tell me wht do I do to recover my PR.
The report ZKAOIDEO edits commitments for which there is no P.O or P.R (for this reason, you cannot use ME23N or ME53N to display a P.O or P.R for these commitments.
Plz give me ur suggestion. Need ur help.
Regards,
ANSAR.

As per abopve query,
In Production server the PR is Missing, that means it is deleted, it can be seen only in cji5, we see that commitment of Rsu2026. exists against PR no...., itself doesnot exist in system.
Plz let me know how it is possible that PR is non-existent (T-code-ME53N) inspite of commitment against it & how to reverse/clear the commitment in such case to close the WBS.
Report RKANBU01 is there in the system, but ZKAOIDE0 & ZKAOIDE2 doesnot exist in the system, then how to run RKACOR04 in the system.
plz need some help.

Regarding work flow for credit block release in sales order

Dear Experts,
Kindly help me with work flow-
my scenario is if customers credit limit of 5000$ exceeds in sales order it should be blocked and notification should go to authorize person through simple mail to release this block.
for this i have done settings in out control i have used output type krml and determined partner as employee responsible to release block in customer master but mail is not triggered to authorized person for credit block and how i can create work flow for this so that authorized person should get notify for credit block as well he releases block also.
Regards
Supriya

Dear supriyaparimal,
Please find the below points to fix your issue.
1. Configure the out put determination by using the condition type KRML.(Hope oyu have done it already).
2.Maintain the condition records in VV11 for condition type "KRML"
3.Then select the condition record and click the communication tab .
4. If you want to give any information you can use "Note for recipient".
5. If the information has to be sent to relevant person you recipient name in the recipient column.
Save the documnet.
If you raise the sales order and if it is blocked then system automatically send the information to respective person.
You can get this in formation in ""SBWP" transaction code.
Check the in box, the information what you have mentioned in the condition records will be appeared.
Please let me know if you have any clarifications
Thanks&Regards
raghu.k

How to set "Maximum Lenght" column property for database block at RUNTIME?

Hi folks,
Is it possible to somehow set a "Maximum Length" property for database block column at runtime?
I have a dynamic form, which maintains mostly "STATIC DATA" within all application which are stored in different static data tables (which have similar structure). But now, description column in some of those tables was extended (not in all at this stage). I would like to avoid truncating form error while reading data from those extended tables, so I would like to set an MAXIMUM SIZE to accurate value at the time when I'm specifying TABLE NAME for that database block.
What property should I use to set it?
   -- before executing query in "MAIN_BLOCK" I always set QUERY_DATA_SOURCE_NAME to user defined value => STATIC DATA TABLE name
   Set_block_Property('MAIN_BLOCK',QUERY_DATA_SOURCE_NAME,:control.table_name);
   Set_block_Property('MAIN_BLOCK',DML_DATA_TARGET_NAME,:control.table_name);
   -- here I would like to set also MAXIMUM LENGHT for particular column (based on some condition, etc.. correct value I can get from ALL_TAB_COLS dictionary
   SET_ITEM_PROPERTY('MAIN_BLOCK.DESCRIPTION', <<XXXXXXX>>, 300);What should I use instead of "<<XXXXXXX>>" if I want to overwrite MAIN_BLOCK.DESCRIPTION column's maximum length to 300?
Thanks,
Tomas

Hi Magoo, thanks for reply.
Yes, but then user can get other errors while trying to set description with value longer than in database (for all not extended tables).
Aby idea how to implement SET_CUSTOM_PROPERTY like mentioned here?
Oracle Forms - "maximum length" property.
Thanks,
Tomas

How to creat commitment for PO PR but not creat statistical cost for GR

Hi,
Quantities and Values in Valuated Project Stock: Example - Material - SAP Library
Planning
Material FIN-M is assigned to network activity V10 and is managed in the project stock for WBS element P/4711.1.
The network type is flagged as appended and apportioned to the WBS.
Before the first MRP planning run or before the planned orders are converted into purchase requisitions or production orders, the following amounts appear in WBS element P/4711.1:
Planned costs of $500,00
Remaining order plan value of $300,00
The MRP controller begins by converting the planned orders. First, the planned order for the material RAW-M is converted into a purchase requisition and the planned order for the material SEMI-M is converted into production order A2.The order type is flagged as not appended and apportioned to the WBS.The remaining order plan value in the WBS element changes by the amount of the internal activities portion of production order A2 to $400,00 (300,00 + 100,00).After the purchase requisition is converted into a purchase order, a cost commitment of $50,00 also appears in WBS element P/4711.1.
External Procurement
Valuated goods are received for the purchase order, but the price is $10 different at $60. Assuming that material RAW-M is price-controlled, this gives rise to a debit posting of $60,00 in the stock account and credit posting of $60 in the GR/IR clearing account (Financial Accounting).If the inventory accounts was created as a cost element in CO, the following appear in WBS element P/4711.1:
Statistical actual costs of $60,00 in the stock cost element
A cost commitment of $0,00
If material RAW-M is price-controlled the standard price is $50,00, the postings in Financial Accounting are: $50,00 debit to a stock account $10,00 debit to a price difference $60,00 credit to the GR/IR clearing account
In this case, the only figure in the WBS element would be statistical actual costs of $50,00.
Above excerpt from SAP help, may I know how to do configuration to creat commitment for PO PR but not creat statistical cost for GR?
Thanks and regards,
Ray

Hello Jie,
if i right assuming your query then PR->PO= Commitment should be created.
but GRN by MIGO=Statistical cost should not create once MIGO if right then actual cost would be 0.
you can activate commitment by OKKP transaction.
And you want to cost should not be statistical after MIGO right?
here solution is cost never statistical type until account assignment object not statistical type this is my assumption.
if this is the issue then check G/L account from the PO. then check that G/L account, whether it is a B/S account or P&L account? I think you have wrongly assigned P&L account.
Regards,
Sanjeev

Looking for the block CD Generate Time Profiles for MPC simulation.vi

Hello everyone!!! I am trying to implement MPC in LabVIEW. I have downloaded certain codes which shows the implementation. My question is in those codes i see a block named as CD Generate Time Profiles for MPC simulation.vi. I tried finding a lot for that block but i could not... Can anyone help me out with the problem (exactly under which section will i get that block) or can anyone tell me how do i give the set point profile for the MPC simulation problem???
Solved!
Go to Solution.

The VIs related to generate profile can be found in:
C:\Program Files (x86)\National Instruments\LabVIEW 2011\vi.lib\addons\Control Design\_MPC\Reference Profile
or
C:\Program Files\National Instruments\LabVIEW 2011\\vi.lib\addons\Control Design\_MPC\Reference Profile
You can look at examples in:
C:\Program Files (x86)\National Instruments\LabVIEW 2011\examples\Control and Simulation\Control Design\MPC
C:\Program Files\National Instruments\LabVIEW 2011\examples\Control and Simulation\Control Design\MPC
to verify how to use those VIs.
Barp - Control and Simulation Group - LabVIEW R&D - National Instruments

Authorization object for delivery block

Hi ,
How do I check the authorization object for any field? I specifically need one for delivery block.
Please help.
Thanks,
Shailaja

Hi,
If your looking to put a delivery level block or its removal then i guess you explore it through userexit mv45afzz
Regards,
Saurabh

Business area to be grayed out or hidden for IM program position

Hi Experts,
We want to make the business area field to be grayed out or hidden in IM program position.
We have tried to find of the Field selection for IM program position in configuration, but unfortunately we have not found out any configuration path for the same.
Then we tried to control the business area value by putting any validation / Substitution in IM program position.
But we have not found any validation or substitution for IM program in Customization.
Can you please help in the above issue ??
Regards,
Pradip Shelke

Hi,
There are no configuration nodes nor any substitution or validation available in SAP (standard) that will help in controlling the business area field. The only option available would be to look at user exits:
AAIC0001 | IM Summarization: Processing values after selection
AAIC0002 | IM Summarization: Processing of assigned entities after sel.
AAIC0003 | IM Summarization: Definition of User-Defined Characteristics
Please note that business area is a general field that is used across modules in SAP therefore cannot be restricted via authorizations (unless all effects are considered).
Regards,
Ammar

Commitment for a Block Position of PO in CJI5

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for