Commitment item problem during doing STO

Dear Support,
We are facing problem while doing Stock transfer order from one Plant to another Plant , System is asking for commitment
item , and it should come automitically from system not entered mannuly.
So pls help in this regard where to configure in system.
Thanks

hi
check in your system commitment management is active

Similar Messages

FI 606 No Commitment Item Selected during MB01

Dear All,
I have a problem during GR/IR process in MB01. When logistic section want to post the GR process based on the PO reference, there is an error: No commitment items selected, message FI606.
I already created the commitment item with financial transaction 40, but it didn't affect anything during the GR. The error still the same.
When I try to post the GR, I already activated the trace. There is a GL account for RAVE account derived to another commitment item which does not suitable with the derivation I already inputted in FMDERIVER.
Why does it happen?
Thanks

Hi Aleksey,
Thanks for your reply.
I already set the fin. transaction for GR/IR account 40 and it didn't affect anything.
And I already check the note 148967 and I'm confused how to implement the note.
So the posted journal when GR saved:
Dr. Inventory (GL: 141097200) --> budget, fin.transaction/CI category: 30/3
Dr. RAVE Purchase (GL: 600504000) --> non budget, fin. transaction/CI category: 40/3
Cr. AP GR/IR (GL: 300503000) --> non budget, fin. transaction/CI category: 40/3
I activated the trace before post the GR. In the trace result, the commitment item derived only the inventory commitment item.
Though, the GL appeared in the trace is GL RAVE Purchase (600504000), the commitment item derived is Inventory Commitment item (141097200).
And I check the derivation GL to Commitment Item, the GL RAVE purchase is derived to RAVE Purchase commitment item.
I dont know how it can be happen.
Any solutions? Thanks

Error "FI 606 no commitment items selected" during Goods Receipt

Hi,
We use Fund Management and Material Ledger in ECC 6.0.
Posting goods receipt for material with price control S (Standard price) were successful, but whenever we post goods receipt for material with price control V (Moving average price), the following error comes up:
No commitment items selected
Message no. FI606
System Response
No commitment items selected
What might be the problem?
The account assignment in MIGO view are already filled with fund center and commitment item number automatically
We already assigned all that can be assigned in FMDERIVE (material to comm item, plant to comm item, gl to comm item, etc)
We also already check OSS notes: 939545, 148967, 1312483, 164077
Please help
Thanks

Hi,
Try putting a trace on the FMDERIVE and see what the results are.
Regards,
Eli

Commitment item does not update during PO change

hello All,
when we change PO " GL account " the old commitment item remains without changes.
your help is appreciated,
I.Gad

Hi,
Please, consult note 658163 - Acct assignmnt change: Determinatn of new FM acct assignmnt
Regards,
Eli

Line Item Problem in while Proforma Invoicing in case of STO

Hi All,
The problem is related to Line Item Quantity in Proforma Invoice which is explained with an example -
When we are doing Outbound Delivery for STO ( Stock Transfer Order ) we have the batch-split function where 2 line generates for a single line item material A in which in the first line no delivery quantity and value gets reflected and in the second line for the same material the delivery quantity gets reflected with batches. Then we save the order and done PGI. After that while doing the proforma invoice there also again the 2 lines appear for the single material A where the first line doesn't contain invoice quantity and value and show as 0pcs.In the second line for the same material it shows the invoice quantity with value. I want to remove this first line for the same line item from proforma invoice and want the system to generate only one line for the line item containing the invoice quantity.
Point to be noted that this thing doesn't happen for normal sales cycle done through Sales Order.
I have also checked with the Item Category NLN where i have tried the Billing relevance N - Pro Forma - no zero quantities (including main batch items) and L - Pro Forma - no zero quantities. Still the same problem is arising.
What is the problem here and how can it be solved?
Looking forward to some valuable suggestions
Thanks & Regards
Priyanka Mitra

check for your batch item cateogry,,, maintain the batch item cateogry setting same as it is ther in case of normal sale cycle. or what you can do ,,,copy your batch item cateogry and create a new batch item cateogry for your STO delivery .
i did it and it is working fine for me. please check the batch item cateogry and matain it the same way.
cheers

ITEM IS NOT RELEVANT FOR BILLING WHILE DOING STO (VF01)

HI
I am getting an error while doing STO in CIN
Item is not relevant for billing while doing VF01 STO proforma invoice JEX with delivery document type NL and item category NLN
I searched the forum but not able to get an appropriate solution for this.
Kindly revert me on the same
Regards
MANOJ

Hi Manoj,
The only reason for the error you are encountering are,
A. The item category missing at the item level in the copying controls from delivery to JEX (billing type)
Kindly check throughly and confirm,
If it is there , then delete the configuration , i.e. item category from the copying controls and do it again.. Even if this do not resolve your issue, ask your technical team to debugg the billing document during creation and check.

Error in doing in Commitment item Financial Transaction

Hi
Iam facing a problem while doing GR/IR because GR/IR gl account has been assigned to commitment item category of 60 instead of 40. But most of the PO's iam able to do the GR/IR apart from a handfull.That is confusing me.If its a configuration error then it should not allow all POs .I have searched and posted in the forum regarding the change of commitment item financial transaction change but i been adviced that i cannot change that once been posted into it. Plz guide me on this matter
Regards
Vipin

Hi osvaldo
The reversing is where the problem arises.There are lot many postings happening in an hour and the count is increasing. It will be hard for me to reverse the whole and morover my user is so stubborn that he is not allowing me to create a new commitment item for GR/IR. i got a commitement item which is been assigned to GR /IR item and vendor account of FT 60. i want to change the GR/IR item to FT 40 and not for the Vendor item. I have no other optionleft to create a new commitment item for GR/IR.Thts where iam stuck with. It was a mistake while entering the rule in FM Derive
Regards
Vipin

Commitment item 233000 does not exist in FM area ZK01, fiscal year 2009, an

Hi,
i am creating schedule agrement or 1 st april 2009 getting error
Commitment item 233000 does not exist in FM area ZK01, fiscal year 2009, and variant

Hi
Try
u can do one thing create commitemnt item for the year 2009. public sector management - Create commitmen titem
then u assign commitment item to GL in Fmderiver Transaction code
then u post
Reagards
Roobal

Scheduling Agreement Item not reflected as commitment item in CO

HI SAP MM Gurus,
Good day!
Here is my scenario:
We need to create scheduling agreements with Account Assignment F which needs to have the commitment items reflected upon creation of the delivery schedule. This works ok if I create the documents (Scheduling Agreement and Delivery Schedule) manually, with the field EKPO-XOBLR being set to X to have the items pass through to CO
The problem is, due to the volume of documents processed, we need to create an upload program using the function module BAPI_SAG_CREATE. Upon observation, this does not update the commitments for the shceduling agreement items even though both the scheduling agreement and delivery schedule were created.
Any thoughts on how I can resolve this?
Kind regards,
DeLo

Are u sure the transaction code is ME33L, contracts use ME33K
Now this is tricky.
One way of finding the condition table used is (working backwards)...
go to table KONH
in the field VAKEY enter your contract(10 chars as in EKKO/EKPO w/ leading zeroes or trailing spaces) and contract line(5 chars w/ leading zeroes).
look at KVEWE (A in my case) and KOTABNR (16 in my case) used now join the two (A016 add the zero in between) now this is the condition table.
working forward.
if the condition table is A016
Get A016-KNUMH from A016
A016-KAPPL = 'M'
A016-KSCHL = 'PB00' (condition you are looking for)
A016-EVRTN = Your Contract Number
A016-EVRTP = Your Contract Line Number
Select DATAB (Validity Start Date), DATBI (Validity End Date) from KONH
where KNUMH EQ A016-KNUMH
Cheers!
Rishi

Commitment Item error in Stock transport order

Hi all
I have a stock transport order (STO) for a material non valuated in both sending and receiving plants.
While creation , there is an error with respect to completion of an "committment item" *.
If I input the committment item in STO create transaction in R3 , the STO is saved (permitting blank account assignment for the STO item as intended) and there is no further issue till post goods issue in sending plant or GR in receiving plant.
The problem is however that this STO is triggered from APO and transferred via CIF to R3 while there is no chance to input the commitment item. This results into a CIF error with the STO not created in both R3 and APO.
Is there a way I could bypass this "committment stuff" in this situation?
Thanks in advance
Anton
*The exact error message is as follows;
" No commitment item entered in item 00001 plant < >
Message no. FI311
Diagnosis
The posted document contains at least one company code in which Funds Management, Cash Budget Management, or Project Cash Management is active. Therefore you must enter a commitment item in all involved company codes.
Procedure
Enter a commitment item.
If you cannot enter a commitment item, check with your system administrator that your account assignment derivation is adjusted so that the system can automatically derive a commitment item from another account assignment, or from the G/L or cost element. "

Hi,
Did you try using derivation rule using FMDERIVE in case funds management is active.
Please also refer to the link below which guides on the item category to be assigned in Commitment item.
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/f0/ca5716260211d28a430000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Regards
K.R

Commitment item not picking while MIRO posting for Service entry sheet

Hi to all,
We have activated Fund Management in middle of the year where there were purchase order completed to till MIGO. When we do MIRO now system unable to pick commitment item from FMDERIVE.
We have created Commitment item as 50/3 combination ( No budget check ) and assigned to GR/IR clearing account.
We also activated trace in FMDERIVE and checked MIRO posting and found that derivation is working properly but while posting it is triggering error.
Some one advise me as it affected daily activities.
Thanks & Regards,
Y.Kiran Babu

Hi,
For the purchase order completed and the related MIGO created before FM was implemented, you need to run FMCN and FMCT.
I will explain to you in detail all the information related to the matter.
First of all, it seems to be in your PO that does not have FM account assignment (funds center and commitment item) in account assignment TAB. In addition, the error occurs usually also because in your SES the FM account assignment is missing.
For GR and IR documents FM always takes the major part of the FM account assignment from the PO.
You can fill these account assignments by using the programs RFFMCHAN/RFFMCHAT.
FMCN/FMCT must be run for the first document in the chain, which is the PO in case you don't have a PR assigned to this PO or an earmarked fund document. If you have PR's assigned to the PO's please run FMCN/FMCT for the PR first.
When executing the FMCT transaction, ALL documents selected in one group must be tested and processed successfully TOGETHER. If any one document fails, the ENTIRE group is shown as in error.
Therefore, first step is to ensure that the reference PO has a valid FM account assignment and is updated in FM. This should be done by FMCN/FMCT and subsequent posting with FMN4N (see reconstruction note 189761).
The SES itself might not be changed by FMCT. Therefore you should fulfill the FM account assignments in SES manually or with a custom program.
Please check also your table FM01X. As an alternative solution, you can enable one of these flags in table FM01X, depending on your business needs:
FLG_PO_PROTECT if you want to always inherit the fm account assignment from the reference PO and therefore skip FMDERIVE
FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE if you always want to force a call to fmderive in all cases
FLG_SES_OVERWRITE in services, if you wish to overwrite the account assignment from the SES with the derived values from FMDERIVE.
You can find more information about it in text part of notes 1146677 and 923672.
FMDERIVE is skipped for GR/IR lines and the Commitment item is inherited from the PO regardless of whether or not the GR/IR line is FM relevant. This is SAP standard behavior.
If you want to force the Commitment item to be derived from the GL account for the GR/IR line, you can use the FLG_FMDERIVE_FORCE flag as described in note 923672. This will allow FMDERIVE to be called for these lines. Please be sure to fully test this to ensure that FM account assignments that you do not want to be overwritten are not incorrectly derived.
Bear in mind that for PO´s that does not have account assignment you should run FMCN/FMCT + FMN4N. For this you would need to check the flags and which one is more related to your needs. With the appropriate flag marked in FM01X (active with X) you should be able to run the transactions without any issue.
Based on note 189761, after doing all the previous suggestions and the issue does not appear anymore, I suggest you to run the following programs:
1) FMN0 for this PO/GR to see if the actual values are correct in FM table FMIFIIT (FM actual line items).
2) Run report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF). The reconstruction programs always update the totals records in Funds Management. Therefore, you do not normally need to reconstruct the totals records. However, if you suspect there are data inconsistencies in the totals records, you can analyze and correct these using the report RFFMRC04 (transaction FMAF).
If you correct the totals records, you must do this before you reconstruct the assigned values (see below).
3) Run reconstruction for AVC
You can also reconstruct the assigned values using the following tools:
    o Report BPINDX03 (transaction FMBV) for former budgeting
    o Report RFFMAVC_REINIT (transaction FMAVCREINIT) for the Budget
       Control System (BCS)
Make sure that no other system activities (postings, budgeting) are carried out during a reconstruction (commitment/actual or assigned values).
I believe that this resolve your inquiry.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Problem during recording of CJ01 transaction for BDC

Hello All,
I am facing a problem during the recording of CJ01(Creation of projects) for creation of BDC program.
The problem is during recoding after entering the the first WBS element with level 1 and i press the '+' button to create one more WBS element with Level 2,the first WBS element with level 1 goes to the bottom of the line item table and now if try to create the WBS element with Level 2 in the first line it wont allow because of the fact that the first WBS element with level 1 is below it.
But if i enter the first WBS elemnt with level 1 in the first line and come to the next line and enter the second WBS element with level 2 it will create since Level 2 WBS is below the Level 1.But this approach cannot be used for doing a recording for BDC.
Can anyone help in this regard
Thanks in Advance
Ashish

Hi Ashish,
NW is right. It is not proper to use BDC for CJ01. You can get more control and better if you use the following function module,
1. Use BAPI_PROJECT_MAINTAIN to create project definition and WBS Structure in one go. see the documentation in the BAPI on how to use this. Post the resut in this forum if you face any problem
Ravi

Commitment item updated wrongly

Hi friends
I have a doubt in funds management budget control suystem
at the time of creating PO - No problem (FM account assignment is providing me correct commitment item and Fundscenter)
Below is the scenario
I have assigned commitment item - "INV" for the inventory FI-GL account and it is populated in PO - correctly
when i do the GRN i get
Inventory account Debited with commitement item "INV" (correctly)
GR/IR account credited with commitemnt item "INV" (wrongly)
for the GR/IR line item I want commitment "GR/IR" to get populated instead of commitment tem "INV"
In the GR/IR GL account I have assigned commitment item "GR/IR"
if so why am I getting commitment item "INV" instead of commitment item "GR/IR"
where is the problem please please can you help me by answering this
P.S
the commitment item "INV" is with 30/3 Combination
the commitment item "GR/IR" is with 40/3 combination
Thank you & Kindest Regards
Srikaanth

Hi, before posting use search, this question discussed.
\You can't substitute CI for GR/IR account during GR, it populate from Dr account(from PO)

Commitment Item in Stock Transport Order

Hi,
We are planning to carry out a intercompany sales using a stock transport PO.
My problem is when a STO is created Account assignment tab in the item overview is not visible because of which i am not able to enter the commitment item for the material.
I have tried activating the BADI : ME_COMMITMENT_STO_CH.
I have used the sample coding given in the method.
But still i face the same problem.
How do we get this commitment item field in STO of is there some other way by which this issue can be handled.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi Arokianathan,
I understand you are trying to put account assignment category like 'K' in transaction ME21N for creation of an intercompany STO.
You have two choices 1) Use transaction ME21 (old) and not ME21N
2) In transaction ME21N , use type of order as Return PO , this will remove the greying in the account assignment category field, you can now put in your value like K etc ... Afterwards you have to goto tothe top and again select document type as Intercompany STO.
Ones you fill in the material number and other details the account assignment tab page would automatically appear in the sub item level.
Hope this helps..
Regards
Arnab Maitra

GL Account and Commitment Items Integration

Hi Consultants,
Please explain the GL account and commitment items relationship. I know i can assign a commitment item to N number of GL accounts.
But can i assign many commitment items to one GL account?
Thank you.
Ekemini

Dear FM Expert,
I 'm new in the forum. I have some problem related to fmderive too. I have to do as your scenario that is to derive stat committment item to depreciation expense account. I use fmderive with user exit EXIT_SAPLFMDT_001 and include ZXFMDTU01
Coding to check AFAB tcode to derive the committment item. It's not work
if sy-tcode+0(4) = 'AFAB'.
    if I_FMDERIVE_SOURCE-account_number = 'xxx'.
      e_fmderive_target-commit_item = 'xxx'.
    endif.
ENDIF.
When I set trace , It seems work when test run for AFAB but when I do production run that need run in background. It does not work. Is there anything wrong with my code or Does fmderive work with Background job
Is there any suggesttion , please ?
Thank you very much,
one

Commitment item problem during doing STO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for