Common upgrade issues

hello BW Experts,
what are the common issues during the upgrade from 3.0 to 3.5. we are on unix system, Oracle db.
suggestions appreciated
Thanks,
BWer

BWer,
Pls check
Version of Oracle for Upgrade to BW 3.5
Bw 3.5 upgrade help
-Doodle

Similar Messages

  • Upgrade issues OBIEE 10g to 11g along with OBIA upgrade

    Hi,
    I have to upgrade OBIEE 10.1.3.4.1 to OBIEE 11.1.1.5 along with OBIA 7.9.6.1 to 7.9.6.5(Informatica 8.6.1 to 9.0.1) at my client location and I have very little knowledge on it. and want to know/have help documents for upgrade.
    And if anyone in the forums involved in upgrade please list the errors/issues occured during upgrade and after upgrade.
    1. OBIEE 10g to 11g upgrade issues??
    2. OBIA OBIA 7.9.6.1 to 7.9.6.5 upgrade issues along with 10g to 11g??
    3. Informatica 8.6.1 to 9.0.1 upgrade issues??
    4. DAC upgrade issues??
    any response for my questions is appreciated.
    Thanks
    Jay.
    Edited by: Jay on Apr 11, 2012 9:11 AM

    HI Jay,
    We cannot explained thread list here, If you get any errors plz post me,will try to help out.
    This is oracle document link - This document has given step by step with screen shots upgration for 10g to 11g ,Please refer the below link.
    http://www.oracle.com/webfolder/technetwork/tutorials/obe/fmw/bi/bi11115/upgrade/upgrade_to_11g.htm
    http://obieemanu.blogspot.in/2011/05/rpd-upgration-from-10g-to-11g.html
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21764_01/upgrade.1111/e10125/ua_command_line.htm#ASMAS149
    Award points it is useful.
    Thanks,
    satya

  • Report generation toolkit upgrade issues

    I have created multiple vi's in that utilize the previous report generation toolkits specifically using the Generate Report Get Data to Modify.vi and the Generate Report Set Modified Data.vi.  Obviously the report reference has now changed in 8.6's version of the report generation toolkit and these vi's do not exist in the 8.6 library anymore.  What vi's do I need to replace these functions with to make this code work.  Can anyone tell me what the work around is to solving this problem.  This is a picture of the code.
    BJD1613
    Lead Test Tools Development Engineer
    Philips Respironics
    Certified LV Architect / Instructor
    Attachments:
    code.JPG ‏92 KB

    Hi BJD1613,
    The Report Generation VIs on the LabVIEW Palettes mutate properly. However, you may run into upgrade issues if VIs distributed with LabVIEW, but not available in the Palettes are used in the code. Hence, I would caution against using them for the same reason.
    In this case, the specific references do exist in the report generation classes; however, since they are private, they cannot be accessed by VIs outside the respective classes. A temporary workaround for now is mentioned in the following KB 4OOCSJ4M Getting References in Report Generation Toolkit 1.1.3 with LabVIEW 8.6.  
    This was reported to R&D (CAR# 123064) for further investigation

  • EHP Upgrade Issue - Java Stack

    Hi,
    Our Source System at NW 7.0 SP13 and we are upgrading the system to EHP1 SP03.
    Upgrade failed at Downtime > DEPLOY_ONLINE_DEPL phase.
    Error log:
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:                       com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.doExecute(AbstractPhaseType.java:863) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Exception has occurred during the execution of the phase.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:             com.sap.sdt.jspm.unattended.RequestController.addContextInfo(RequestController.java:178) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Deployment of queue sapjup-queue completed with error
    JSPM version is 7.01.3.0.15. Current JSPM log directory is /usr/sap/XPD/JC00/j2ee/JSPM/log/log_2009_09_09_16_09_42.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]: com.sap.sdt.sapjup.tools.sapjupjspm.SAPJupJSPMRapiAdapter.createAndLogRapiException(SAPJupJSPMRapiAdapter.java:698) [Thread[main,5,main]]: The deployment of the queue failed.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]: com.sap.sdt.sapjup.tools.sapjupjspm.deploy.SAPJupJSPMDeployer.deployList(SAPJupJSPMDeployer.java:68) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Could not execute deployment of stack file /usr/sap/trans/EPS/in/XPD.xml.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Error]:      com.sap.sdt.j2ee.phases.PhaseTypeDeploymentManager.execute(PhaseTypeDeploymentManager.java:519) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Error while executing DeploymentManager phase with action deploySlot. Check the log files for the specified action.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:906) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase UPGRADE/DEPLOYMENT_BASED_UPGRADE/DEPLOY_ONLINE_DEPL has been completed.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:907) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Start time: 2009/09/09 22:09:42.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:909) [Thread[main,5,main]]: End time: 2009/09/09 22:11:51.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:910) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Duration: 0:02:08.248.
    Sep 9, 2009 10:11:51 PM [Info]:                         com.sap.sdt.ucp.phases.AbstractPhaseType.cleanup(AbstractPhaseType.java:911) [Thread[main,5,main]]: Phase status is error.
    I went through the following link , proceeded with option 2, But still getting same error.  
    Portal Upgrade Issue
    Please advise the resolution for the issue I have.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Srinivas
    Edited by: Srinivas Dasari on Sep 10, 2009 5:48 AM
    Edited by: Srinivas Dasari on Sep 10, 2009 5:48 AM

    Issue resolved

  • Upgrade issues list needed

    Hi,
    We're currently on 4.6b and going to upgrade to ECC6 with unicode I'm trying to compile a list point taken care converting to unicode from ABAP technical point of view. Does anyone have such a list?
    Some points i shortlisted are :
    1) Use GUI_UPLOAD and GUI_DOWNLOAD rather than WS_UPLOAD and WS_DOWNLOAD.
    2) Structures or table headers that contain non-character data need to be identical when moving, comparing, selecting into, updating from, etc.
    3) OPEN DATASET filename IN TEXT MODE FOR INPUT ENCODING DEFAULT.
    I know there are others. Any help would be appreciated.
    aRs

    Check the below links
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=268386&highlight=upgrade+issues
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=263434&highlight=upgrade+issues
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=261051&highlight=upgrade+issues
    http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=253316&highlight=upgrade+issues

  • Errors in Forte 3.5 -Upgrade issue

    hello ,
    We are having a frequent disruption in the communication SO which has an
    externalConnection Class. Did anything change in 3.5? We did not have
    these errors in 3L!
    After these erros, we have a mutex locking problem which leaves our
    application hanging.
    Any help will be greatly appreciated!
    thanks
    suma
    Here is an Excerpt of the log file
    Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 194 bytes written to 10
    INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
    process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
    find
    out why.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [501, 152]
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
    (partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
    [F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
    "MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment laxrc2.
    INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
    (partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
    [F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
    24-May-2001 09:16:47: VH.G.G..GUIT/GUI0/PLAXRC172.23.4.401/../..;PGYX;
    Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 233 bytes written to 10
    INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
    process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
    find
    out why.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [501, 152]
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
    (partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
    [F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
    "MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment laxrc2.
    INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
    regards,
    Suma Venkatesh

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Venkatesh, Suma
    Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 2:39 PM
    To: '[email protected]'
    Subject: Errors in Forte 3.5 -Upgrade issue
    hello ,
    We are having a frequent disruption in the communication SO which has an
    externalConnection Class. Did anything change in 3.5? We did not have
    these errors in 3L!
    After these erros, we have a mutex locking problem which leaves our
    application hanging.
    Any help will be greatly appreciated!
    thanks
    suma
    Here is an Excerpt of the log file
    Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 194 bytes written to 10
    INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
    process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
    find
    out why.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [501, 152]
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
    (partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
    [F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
    "MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment
    laxrc2.
    INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:29
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
    (partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
    [F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
    24-May-2001 09:16:47: VH.G.G..GUIT/GUI0/PLAXRC172.23.4.401/../..;PGYX;
    Task 9: extConn4030a808.Write: 233 bytes written to 10
    INFORMATION: Network partner closed connection. This usually means the
    process at the other end of the wire failed. Please go look there and
    find
    out why.
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Error #: [501, 152]
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 2
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "MerlinWindows_cl41_Part8",
    (partitionId = F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105, taskId =
    [F2E11800-5003-11D5-BF99-AE145F2AAA77:0x105.7]) in application
    "MerlinWindows_cl41", pid 23406 on node laxrc2 in environment
    laxrc2.
    INFORMATION: Error parameters for Set:0 Msg:0:
    Class: qqsp_DistAccessException
    Detected at: qqcm_HoseFSM::ReceivedClose at 1
    Error Time: Thu May 24 09:16:47
    regards,
    Suma Venkatesh

  • R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login using forms:Please help****urgent

    We have recently upgraded our instance from 11.5.9 to 12.0.4 in Windows 2003 server.
    We are unable to login to forms after upgrade, however we are able access self service responsibilities without any issues.
    We are getting APP-FND-01496 when we access any forms responsibility. We have tried all possible metalink notes with no luck.
    Any help to resolve this issue will be appreciated.

    Duplicate thread ...
    R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login to forms**please help
    Re: R12 upgrade issue:Not able to login to forms**please help

  • ECC 6.0 EHP-4 upgrade Issue in phase MAIN SHDRUN/ALTNTAB FILL were negative

    Hi Basis Expert,
    while doing ECC 6.0 EHP-4 Upgrade in MAIN_SHDRUN/ALTNTAB_FILL phase we are getting the following issue please help us.
    Checks after phase MAIN_SHDRUN/ALTNTAB_FILL were negative!
    Last error code set: BATCH JOB RDDNT2MT FAILED: Error(s) found in the log(s), accumulated in "ALTNTFI.ELG".
    We check the shadow instance is up and we can log in to the system. Check ST22 and SM21 notice no error.
    Check the JOB RDDNT2MT (SM37) successfully running and all the job finish without any error.
    Hope anybody can share a bit your experience on this issue. we try search the note and  find the forum but no luck.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    > 2EETG011 "No shadow system""(environment parameter)""auth_shadow_upgrade"
    > 2EETG011 "No shadow system""DB-connect not against shadow tables !"
    >
    It looks from your log that shadow system is not able to connect to database. Please check your shadow system. Check below link as well:
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-basis/ecc-6-upgrade-issue-in-phase-altntab_fill-1556272
    Thanks
    Sunny
    Edited by: Sunny Pahuja on Oct 15, 2010 1:27 PM

  • OBIEE 11G - Common Prod issues

    Hi,
    I manage a team of OBIEE 11g Resources. i do not have hands on experience in OBIEE but been managing the team for the last 4 months.I do understand basics OBIEE 11G concepts and understand the different layers and i have good SQL skills.
    Am currently in the US and have been asked to be the level 1 support for OBIEE issues in Prod.( I really wonder why am asked to do so :( )
    Am trying to get myself prepared to handle OBIEE 11G issues as our first projects move to Prod end of this month.
    Am looking for a list of common prod issues one might generally face in production in OBIEE 11G and as to how to get prepared to be able to look at the issue and be able to see what the issue is. From there on i might delegate it to the OBIEE resources offshore.
    Can someone throw some light on this please ??
    Thanks,
    Chan

    Browser Cache issues - might display staled results to users.
    Make sure your power users run requests with filters.
    Excel downloads - might be missing rows /columns based on version of 11g.
    If you have data level security enabled, you might get not all results displayed complaint.
    Staled data - due to gaps in cache management.
    Make sure you get exact error message, to search for resolution.
    most of the issues might be listed in support.oracle.com / blogs / here-
    hope this helps..

  • Upgrade issues list

    Hi All,
    I was wondering if anyone had a list of Upgrade issues (most likely, from ticketting system) to the 5.0 system.
    Thanks

    Hi mark,
    Can u please send me the  upgrade issue list to this email address
    [email protected]

  • IDSM-2 - upgrade issue - 5.x to 6.x

    Hello All,
    I have an issue upgrading the IDSM-2 module I'm playing with.
    It is currently running version 5.0(2).
    The thing is when I try to upgrade the image to the latest 6.x version using the .bin.gz file, I get the follwing error message :
    The filename IPS-IDSM2-K9-sys-1.1-a-6.1-2-E3.bin.gz is not a valid upgrade file type.
    Continue with upgrade? []:
    There is no image file that is not .bin.gz on the download section of the website. Only recovery images have the .pkg extension.
    Does anybody how to troubleshoot this simple(I guess) upgrade issue?
    Regards,
    Thibault.

    You are trying to "upgrade" using a "System Image" (-sys-) file instead of an Upgrade file.
    The upgrade file for the IDSM-2 is the standard upgrade file used across almost all IPS/IDS models:
    IPS-K9-6.1-2-E3.pkg
    It can be downloaded here:
    http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/ips6

  • Unable to connect to companies in current server as algorithm is not update; run common upgrade security algorithm

    Dear,
    I've had problems with the installation of version 9.0 PL04 (base) when trying to enter the base DemoUS, this system message I get: Unable to connect to companies in current server as algorithm is not update; run common upgrade security algorithm.
    Please someone has an idea how to fix (attached image of the message).

    Try this:
    1. Check if the SBO-Common database exist. If you cannot find SBO-Common database you must re-install SBO system on the server.
    2. If the SBO-Common database exists, then SAP Business One application version is higher than the SBO-Common database version. Perform version upgrade.
    Regards,
    JC.

  • Algorithm is not updated run common upgrade to update security algorithm - 9.0 PL05

    Hi Experts,
    I am installed 9.0 PL05 in the standalone PC with SQL server 2008 R2 express edition.
    PC configuration :
    Windows 7- 32 bit
    RAM - 4GB
    I am getting the below error , when i try to open the OEC Computers company DB.
    Unable to connect to companies in current server as
    algorithm is not updated run common upgrade to update security algorithm
    Regards,
    Dwarak

    Hi,
    Try this:
    1. Delete demo DB and SBO common DB through SQL server management
    2. Remove all sap related programs from control panel
    3. Restart and reinstall everything
    Thanks & Regards,
    Nagarajan

  • Frustrating Phone Upgrade issue

    We need help with phone upgrade issue we encounter when BestBuy associate process our upgrade. Associate is saying we are not eligible but we have not done any phone upgrade since Jan 2011. Our ATT mobile service was established with BB in 2009 and we only upgraded 2 phones in Jan 2011 thru BB. The only recent change in January 2013 was a change of responsibility between my spouse and me since my company has a better employer discount thru ATT. No change and per ATT, no contract and we should be able to upgrade in any retail store. But BB keeps telling us we have issue with ATT and can do our upgrade only with ATT Corporate Store. Our mobile account is a regular family plan account as originally established with BB and just like any BB customer, have employer's discount attached. I don't understand how BB system communicates with ATT system so it is hard for me to explain to ATT what "error message" BB associate is receiving. It has become so frustrating with BestBuy telling us to check with ATT and then for ATT to tell us that there is no issue at their end. We have been a loyal BB customer with all major appliances bought from them including protection plan. The least they can do is work with their ATT representative to figure out between themselves what the issue is. Here we are willing to give both companies our business with new phones and new contracts and no one can help us out.

    LTGee -
    I am very sorry to hear about this. I am going to send you a Private Message to collect some information from you to see if we can get to the bottom of this. To check your private messages, ensure you are logged into the forum and click on the envelope on the upper right hand side of the forum.
    Thanks!
    Jesus|Senior Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
     Private Message

  • Common Java upgrade issues?

    at work, we're about to move from java 1.3.1_16 to either 1.4.2_06 or 1.5.0_06.
    Has anyone here ever had any problems when using classes that were compiled with an older javac on newer JVMs? I've done a ton of testing, and I can't find any problems with any of our code, but I want to know if there's anything that I should be looking for, in particular deprecated/removed functionality.
    when I compiled all of our code with Java 1.5, i got warnings where generics should have been used, but that was it. So I know that my code at least compiles. is that good enough evidence that my code (that was initially developed and tested on 1.3.1) will work fine when compiled with a newer JDK and run on a newer JVM?
    Many thanks, in advance.

    No, the fact it compiles doesn't guarantee that a runtime (uncaught) error could occur. You probably should review the compatibility documenttion for the Java versions invloved, looking for problems. Here, for instance, is the doc from 1.5.0_06
    http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/compatibility.html
    Note this statement from it:
    J2SE 5.0 is strongly compatible with previous versions of the Java 2 platform. Almost all existing programs should run on J2SE 5.0 without modification. However, there are some minor potential source and binary incompatibilities in the JRE and JDK that involve rare circumstances and "corner cases" that we are documenting here for completeness.
    Another possibility for problems exists - if your code does something to work around a bug, and the bug was subsequently fixed, that code may fail. You may want to scan the list of bug fixes for this ;)

Maybe you are looking for