[community] repo: Movement of orphaned packages to unsupported.

Hi fellow Archers,
With time, the number of orphaned packages in the community repo has steadily increased because of various reasons: TUs no longer had time/interest to maintain a package, TUs leaving the group, etc. Currently there's about 300 orphans in [community] and the TU group doesn't have currently the time or interest to maintain all of them.  We finally came to the conclusion that it would be better to have maintained PKGBUILD in AUR than stale packages in community. So, in the next weeks, we'll gradually move some (all?) of them to unsupported. To ensure that these PKGBUILD get adopted by regular users, we'll be handing out orphaned community packages to users who are willing to maintain them. So if you are interested in one or more orphaned community packages, request it in this thread and it'll be moved to unsupported for you to adopt it. We'll be accepting requests until April 4th  but it could be extended if necessary. Hopefully, this will drop the number of orphans to a manageable amount. If not, more orphans will be moved to unsupported.
Once a package is moved to unsupported, I can't guaranty that someone else browsing the AUR will adopt it. So you should adopt it as soon as it's moved to unsupported. If someone else request a package that you want before you, as a matter of courtesy, please give that person a few days to adopt the PKGBUILD. After that, you can adopt it. Also, once you adopt a package, you'll probably need to update it as some of these packages are out-of-date or the arch and license fields are missing.
"Reserved" orphans: DaNiMoTh is currently a TU candidate and, if he gets voted in, is willing to  adopt the following orphans: mozplugger, sportstracker, gobby and rsnapshot. You may request them but they'll remain in the community repo until the end of the voting period to minimize package movement.
Snowman

The community repo cleanup is completed.
The current orphans will remain in community and have been fixed/updated.
I've added myself to the notification list so I'll be aware of any
comments.
Some packages were completely removed from community/AUR:
schism:              obsoleted by schismtracker
gst-plugins-png:     Arch no longer support gstreamer 0.8
mysql-administrator: obsoleted by mysql-gui-tools
mysql-query-browser: obsoleted by mysql-gui-tools
multisync:           This app has been actually splitted in two other apps
                     (multisync-gui and msynctool) whose PKGBUILDs are in
                     unsupported.
Other packages that were also in current/extra were removed.
Packages that were moved to unsupported:
If you want to browse the list with the AUR interface, do a search with me
(Snowman) as submitter and look for the orphaned packages. Several of them
have found a new maintainer in unsupported.
Here's the list:
adns-python
alac_decoder
alex
anubis
arc
asterisk-addons
asterisk-sounds
asterisk-webvmail
atlascpp
bioapi
cal3d
ccid
cherrypy
chicken
cohoba
contacts
cyphesis
daap-sharp
dirac
e-uae
echelon
editobj
eds-feed
entagged-sharp
expresskeys
fantasdic
flamerobin
flumotion
gaim-xmms
galago-gtk-sharp
galago-sharp
gap
gaupol
gcursor
gizmod
gnelib
gnome-ppp
gnome-subtitles
gnomeradio
gpixpod
gpodder
grism
gsoap
gstreamer0.10-pulse
gyrus
hawknl
ifolder
ifolder-server
imapfilter
incollector
invest-applet
io-vm
iwar
joscar
ketchup
krb5-auth-dialog
lbdb
ldtp
leaftag-gnome
liban
libannodex
libao-pulse
libatomic_ops
libccc
libchipcard2
libcmml
libfakekey
libfishsound
libflaim
libgconf-java
libggigcp
libggiwmh
libglade-java
libgnome-java
libharu
libiaxclient
libleaftag
libmatchbox
libmodelfile
libmusclecard
liboggz
libomxil
libopensync-plugin-evolution2
libp11
libphish
libprelude
libpreludedb
libpri
libptp2
librasc
libsexymm
libsirius
libupnp
log4cxx
log4j
log4net
logjam
matchbox-common
matchbox-desktop
matchbox-keyboard
matchbox-panel
matchbox-panel-manager
matchbox-themes-extra
matchbox-window-manager
mediatomb
mercator
ming
mt-daapd
mudmagic
mugshot
muscletool
nautilus-burn-sharp
nautilus-ifolder
nemerle
nepenthes
netatalk
nihongobenkyo
olsrd
ontv
openct
openproducer
opensc
openscenegraph
openvpn-admin
osgedit
outguess
pam_bioapi
pam_p11
pcsclite
prelude-manager
prewikka
pureadmin
py2play
pyao
pygmy
pygopherd
pykanjicard
pymusepack
pyopenal
python-axon
python-dvb3
python-empy
python-gammu
python-kenosis
python-leaftag
python-nattraverso
python-pyalsaaudio
python-pyannodex
python-pygoocanvas
python-pyicu
python-pylucene
python-renderpm
python-scw
python-sexy
python-tofu
python-vobject
python-xlrd
pyzor
rugg
ruli
rvm
sabbu
sage
sharpmusique
shn2make
simias
skstream
slune
sobby
soya
straw
synbak
synfig-core
synfig-etl
synfigstudio
tagutils
tangerine
unicap
varconf
vazaar
wammu
wfmath
wmradio
xmltv
xmltv-druid

Similar Messages

  • Orphan package in community

    LXTask in community is orphan package.
    Someone adopt this. 
    http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=16664

    Allan wrote:Also, it is known.  One of the TU wants to bring the whole LXDE to the [community] repo.
    In case, the original poster wants reference, Here it is.

  • SOLVED-My maintained package is now in the community repo, now what?:)

    Hi,
    I am the maintainer of the package ibus-unikey in the AUR, but now it's moved into the community repo, how can I still maintain this package?
    Many thanks.
    Tinh
    Last edited by tinhtruong (2010-12-28 09:44:42)

    Essentially you don't maintain it any more.  A Trusted User will maintain it in the [community] repo (and should have emailed to let you know...).

  • "out of date" or Orphan package; how to help ?

    Hi,
    I have found several packages in AUR marked as "out of date" or Orphan. I would like to help to update them, or take them as a maintainer.
    However, I am not a Trusted User currently so I can't do this.
    Is there any way that I could better help on this, aside from leaving a comment to the package ?

    To be more precise, Unsupported orphans can be adopted by anyone. Community orphans can only be adopted by TUs.
    Out-of-date packages in Unsupported should be flagged for the maintainer's attention. If an Unsupported package is significantly out of date, you can ask for it to be orphaned by contacting the aur-general mailing list.

  • AUR and community repo is great.

    Lately I have been needed all types of utility and dependency packages, and community repo is often there to provide. AUR and community repo is great! My thanks to all AUR contributors and TUs.

    Moo-Crumpus wrote:Still would like to have aur in pacman...
    I think this is the wrong approach. AUR unsupported is inherently unsafe. We do have TUs flagging packages as safe, but tools such as aurbuild (which I use extensively, don't get me wrong) are likely to open big security holes for users that don't check or don't know how to check the PKGBUILDs.
    We already have AUR in pacman -- the [community] repository. Rather than having more inherent support for aurbuild-style building built into pacman or makepkg, it seems to me we need more unsupported packages going into [community]. This means we need more TUs.
    I'd also like to see more [community] packages going into [extra], which means we need more developers. ;-) But officially supporting aurbuild-style tools in pacman is just not a safe idea.
    Dusty

  • Can't update community repo [solved]

    Hello,
    I'm trying to update my system but any time I try to do it I can't update community repo (I can update the others). This is the output for a simple "pacman -Syu":
    :: Synchronizing package databases...
    core is up to date
    extra is up to date
    community 170.0K 190.1K/s 00:00:01 [#####################] 100%
    error: could not extract 6 ((Empty error message))
    error: failed to update community (unexpected system error)
    archlinuxfr is up to date
    :: Starting full system upgrade...
    local database is up to date
    The problem started after my system freezed.
    Any idea? Thank you
    Last edited by serjor (2009-07-05 17:56:43)

    serjor wrote:
    Hello,
    I'm trying to update my system but any time I try to do it I can't update community repo (I can update the others). This is the output for a simple "pacman -Syu":
    :: Synchronizing package databases...
    core is up to date
    extra is up to date
    community 170.0K 190.1K/s 00:00:01 [#####################] 100%
    error: could not extract 6 ((Empty error message))
    error: failed to update community (unexpected system error)
    archlinuxfr is up to date
    :: Starting full system upgrade...
    local database is up to date
    The problem started after my system freezed.
    Any idea? Thank you
    I tried to extract the community db (located at /var/lib/pacman/community.db.tar.gz) and it throws an EOF error, so may be the problem isn't at my computer.

  • Moving eiskaltdcpp from AUR to community repo

    Not sure if this is the place to ask this
    Is there any reason why eiskaltdcpp is not there in the community repo and instead in AUR. Considering that Eiskaltdcpp works much better than Linuxdcpp which currently is available in the official repos, I was hoping that Eiskaltdcpp could also be moved to the official repos.

    The probable reason is that no TU wants to maintain the package (or other problems, but I guess that chance is small as it is GPL3). Seeing that the package hasn't been updated since 2013-09-12 and seems out of date (check the page), the chance of it being adopted by a TU and put into community seem small at the moment.
    By the way, votes are used to indicate popularity of a package and will increase visibility of the package. So, voting is a good way to start promoting a package.
    EDIT: I was wrong, the package is not out of date. My bad.
    Last edited by runical (2015-02-27 10:46:19)

  • Grass and Qgis from Community repo to AUR

    I noticed that the Grass and Qgis packages disappeared from the community repo. Although they are still available through AUR, should I become worried since I use these programs almost daily on my Arch machines?

    Hm, maybe I start first with 1 ct: I've modified the PKGBUILD of the Qgis  AUR package (pkgver = 1.7.3 and md5sums to the 1.7.3 tar.bz2 package).
    The following PKGBUILD should work:
    # Maintainer: Lantald
    # Contributor: Thomas Dziedzic < gostrc at gmail >
    # Contributor: dibblethewrecker dibblethewrecker.at.jiwe.dot.org
    # Contributor: Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <[email protected]>
    # Contributor: Eric Forgeot < http://esclinux.tk >
    pkgname=qgis
    pkgver=1.7.3
    pkgrel=1
    pkgdesc='Quantum GIS is a Geographic Information System (GIS) that supports vector, raster & database formats'
    url='http://qgis.org/'
    license=('GPL')
    arch=('i686' 'x86_64')
    # update to http://www.qgis.org/wiki/Building_QGIS_from_Source#Overview
    depends=('libmysqlclient' 'postgresql-libs' 'sqlite3' 'jasper' 'curl' 'qt' 'python2' 'python2-qt' 'giflib' 'xerces-c' 'cfitsio' 'qwt5' 'gdal' 'flex' 'bison')
    makedepends=('cmake' 'grass' 'gsl' 'postgis' 'netcdf' 'fcgi' 'python2-sip' 'txt2tags')
    optdepends=('postgis: postgis support and SPIT plugin'
    'fcgi: qgis mapserver'
    'python2-sip: python-support'
    'grass: grass plugin'
    'gsl: georeferencer ')
    options=('!makeflags')
    source=("http://qgis.org/downloads/qgis-${pkgver}.tar.bz2"
    'qgis.desktop')
    md5sums=('e1b3b1f33ea8d648bde0eddf54f7eb90'
    '8ab66039f2aba519b92f52272ec3c13e')
    build() {
    # Fix insecure RPATH is weird, but just works ;)
    # echo "os.system(\"sed -i '/^LFLAGS/s|-Wl,-rpath,.\+ ||g' gui/Makefile core/Makefile\")" >> python/configure.py.in
    #cd qgis-${pkgver}
    rm -rf build
    mkdir build
    cd build
    cmake ../qgis-${pkgver} \
    -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \
    -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH=ON \
    -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr \
    -DGRASS_PREFIX=/opt/grass \
    -DQGIS_MANUAL_SUBDIR=share/man \
    -DQWT_INCLUDE_DIR=/usr/include/qwt5 \
    -DQWT_LIBRARY=/usr/lib/libqwt5.so \
    -DPYTHON_LIBRARY=/usr/lib/libpython2.7.so \
    -DPYTHON_EXECUTABLE=/usr/bin/python2 \
    -DPYTHON_SITE_PACKAGES_DIR=/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages \
    -DPYTHON_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/include/python2.7/
    make
    package() {
    cd build
    make DESTDIR=${pkgdir} install
    # create a more user-friendly application name link
    ln -s /usr/bin/qgis $pkgdir/usr/bin/quantum-gis
    # install some freedesktop.org compatibility
    install -D -m644 ${srcdir}/qgis.desktop \
    ${pkgdir}/usr/share/applications/qgis.desktop
    This build also eliminated a conflict between Qgis 1.7.2 and the Grass-svn build I got this morning.
    For the time being all the bleeding cutting edge packages are working!
    I tried to post a comment on the AUR page but apparently that needs another subscription...
    Keep things up! "GIS Archers UNITE!!!"

  • Docky out of community repo

    Why docky and dockmanager packages are no longer available in community repository and only there are in AUR?
    Thanks and regards!

    The post you're referring to is three months old.  If the package is building again, then what's the problem?  The difference between [community] and the AUR is that packages in the [community] repo are considered fairly stable and trustworthy.  If a package won't build, or is prone to dependency hell, then it stays in the AUR.  As far as I'm concerned, so long as it's a well-established package and will build, it doesn't really matter where it comes from.

  • Community repo (sustainability)

    I'm not familiar with the details of the process involved in maintaining the community repository. However, as an Arch user I witness some of its faults. If these faults are a reason to evaluate or not how things are being done, or to gauge the Community repository quality, I leave it to those in the know. But when a package that has a hard kernel dependency is upgraded in the Community repo and that package doesn't include an essential module which renders it virtually useless, I get annoyed. I need to rollback both package and kernel upgrade. I'd expect from the community repo, what I don't ask in AUR; care.
    I'm not judgmental of the TU (or any other TU for that matter). I fully understand and appreciate all the hard work that they brought upon themselves and the dedication they often show. However when a TU is maintaining well above 1000 packages, something got to be wrong in the humble opinion of this user of yours. It's expected that gross mistakes will eventually happen. And it's when I lose confidence in the Community repo and wonder if it's just not AUR with appointed people to give it a the proper look of an official repo. If the policy is to hold everything that is humanly possible in Community, even if at the end of a string, I think that makes more damage than good.
    The incident isn't isolated. They happen not because we have bad TU (of that I'm positive). But almost certainly because we have overtaxed TUs, either by choice or imposition. Anyways... all this is my my opinion. I'm however, as a user, asked to adhere to the Arch Way. Complexity without complication. I don't expect this to have a double meaning.

    marfig wrote:I'm not familiar with the details of the process involved in maintaining the community repository. However, as an Arch user I witness some of its faults. If these faults are a reason to evaluate or not how things are being done, or to gauge the Community repository quality, I leave it to those in the know. But when a package that has a hard kernel dependency is upgraded in the Community repo and that package doesn't include an essential module which renders it virtually useless, I get annoyed. I need to rollback both package and kernel upgrade. I'd expect from the community repo, what I don't ask in AUR; care.
    this things happen and most cases are upstream issues. i know about powertop and it was a mistake but vmware modules seems to be because upstream deprecated something i guess.(lets see how the bug report is going)
    I'm not judgmental of the TU (or any other TU for that matter). I fully understand and appreciate all the hard work that they brought upon themselves and the dedication they often show. However when a TU is maintaining well above 1000 packages, something got to be wrong in the humble opinion of this user of yours. It's expected that gross mistakes will eventually happen. And it's when I lose confidence in the Community repo and wonder if it's just not AUR with appointed people to give it a the proper look of an official repo. If the policy is to hold everything that is humanly possible in Community, even if at the end of a string, I think that makes more damage than good.
    i fully agree with you. our TUs and developers teams is way to small compared with the amount of packages that we have in the repos. What about applying as TU and help us maintaining(translation getting rid of crap from our repos) ?
    Last edited by wonder (2010-08-20 16:51:17)

  • [SOLVED] community repo: no bug report?

    Hi guys, found a minor bug in a package from community repo. Tried to post it to the bugtracker and realized that it is impossible  to mark "package: community" category. Why? And how I'm supposed to deal with this?
    Last edited by ogronom (2009-12-21 17:57:40)

    choose Community Packages project
    also http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=85083 see Mr.Elendig post
    Last edited by wonder (2009-12-21 17:30:25)

  • Unofficial linux-ck repo with cpu optimized packages is ONLINE

    Given the popularity of the linux-ck package, I have followed nous' lead and created an unofficial repo containing precompiled binary versions of the linux-ck and related packages for community use.  I wrote a wiki article that has instructions, available packages, etc.  Note that the repo contains a generic package and many CPU-specific optimized packages!  Please read the wiki page linked below for more details.
    Enjoy!
    Please keep this thread on topic!  Report only repo/packaging related problems here; open a new thread for non-repo related problems.
    Links
    Which CPU Optimized Package Set to Select?
    Repo-ck Main Page - Simple html index of the repo.  Have a peek to see the unofficial BFS mascot!
    Repo-ck Wiki Article - All you need to know about the repo... and more!
    Repo-ck Statistics - Popularity of packages, which CPU is most popular, # of downloads, etc. in colorful graphs!
    Repo-ck PKGBUILD archive -  Looking for an older version of linux-ck or nvidia-ck to build yourself?  Look no further.
    UPDATE: 03-Mar-2013
    Since some user wish to have access to 'archived' packages, I have decided to honor this request, when a new 2-pt release comes out, I will rotate the previous one into the archive on the repo.  Note that this isn't meant for you to use in /etc/pacman.conf, rather, it is meant for you to manually access the old packages if you wish.
    For example, 3.8.1-1 went live an hour or so ago.  If from some reason you don't feel that it is meeting your needs, you may downgrade to the 3.7.10-1 release (and all associated packages like nvidia-ck, broadcom-wl-ck, etc.).  Note that the archive isn't meant to be a historical source of all version.  It will just hold the most recent in the last 2-pt family.
    Enjoy!
    Last edited by graysky (2013-03-09 11:51:31)

    1LordAnubis wrote:just out of curiosity, is the default config 1000 Hz?
    I'm asking b/c I think you need a multiple of 1000 Hz for virtualbox
    What do you guys find works well?
    The ARCH defaults are tickless (dynamic ticks) and 300 Hz.  I use them w/ vbox just fine... dunno where you got that 1000 Hz advice
    You can check it via:
    zcat /proc/config.gz > config
    Then inspect the config in an editor.  You can always build it yourself with whatever options...
    Last edited by graysky (2011-01-15 23:07:33)

  • Community - The Movie : What will you be ?

    Hi Guys,
    I am assuming that you would have read my Blog on "[Community - The Movie|/people/abesh.bhattacharjee/blog/2008/05/07/community--the-movie-lets-do-it]".
    Just wondering what role would you play in it ?
    Ideas, suggestions - just add to this thread

    Unable to understand u want to make thriller movie , action movie , fun movie , ?
    Could you pls jutsify so that we can JOin....and also write the caption of movie here now it become trend!!
    regards
    sas

  • [SOLVED]How to get orphaned packages that aren't optional dependencies

    On the pacman tips and tricks wiki page, I see there is a way to get orphaned packages, but this sometimes catches packages that are orphaned but are optional dependencies for other packages. Is there a way to get orphaned packages that are not optional dependencies? Also, I'm not sure if this is the right place on the forums for this question, so please let me know if there is a better place.
    Last edited by UnsolvedCypher (2013-05-22 00:16:47)

    Running
    # pacman -Rns python-docutils cdparanoia
    checking dependencies...
    :: abcde optionally requires cdparanoia: Paranoia ripping support
    should be enough. Now you know which package is not a real orphan and why.
    If you want a fugly script for that:
    $ pacman -Qi $(pacman -Qqdt) | grep -e Name -e "Optional For" | grep -v None | grep -B1 Optional
    Name : cdparanoia
    Optional For : abcde

  • The scourge of orphan packages

    In the official repositories, there are some orphan packages.
    Maintainer: None
    Is there a way to bring attention to these packages?
    Bug report? I think it isn't the right way.
    Flag out-of-date? There are orphan packages (example: "wicd") which are flagged out-of-date from months (February). If an orphan package come flagged out-of-date, is the notification received by anybody?
    Thank you.
    EDIT: Maybe this thread was better suited in the "Arch Discussion" section, I clicked on the wrong hyperlink
    Last edited by ekerazha (2008-07-20 20:21:40)

    ekerazha wrote:
    In the official repositories, there are some orphan packages.
    Maintainer: None
    Is there a way to bring attention to these packages?
    Bug report? I think it isn't the right way.
    Heh. http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10964
    NO dont file bug reports on all those. I will close them. Although feel free to turn the above bug into a megabug for packages without a maintaner.
    ekerazha wrote:
    Flag out-of-date? There are orphan packages (example: "wicd") which are flagged out-of-date from months (February). If an orphan package come flagged out-of-date, is the notification received by anybody?
    Thank you.
    Yes the notification isnt received by anybody.

Maybe you are looking for