Community Site Template

Hi,
I am using community site template and I have enabled inbound email capability with discussion forum. However, when a post is posted via inbound email that has attachments, the attachment link does not show up until we edit the post. Is there a way to at
 least point to the link to the attachment in the body of the post?
Thanks,

Hi
have you tried to set a default value like "." to the body field?
Romeo Donca, Orange Romania (MCSE, MCITP, CCNA) Please Mark As Answer if my post solves your problem or Vote As Helpful if the post has been helpful for you.

Similar Messages

  • Error in searching a community site in SP 2013 in Community portal template based site

    hi,
    I have created a community site collection and created few subsites with community site template.
    after this, i have created a community portal template such that i can search for the popular communities in this template.
    [ using content search web part].
    i have performed the full crawl on this web appln in my search serv.appln
    Now when i searched for a  existing community[ clicked on the sear
    ch button] i am getting the below error:.
    Exception Details: System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException:
    The file or folder name contains characters that are not permitted.  Please use a different name.<nativehr>0x81020073</nativehr><nativestack></nativestack>
    Source Error: 
    An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.
    Stack Trace: 
    [COMException (0x81020073): The file or folder name contains characters that are not permitted.  Please use a different name.<nativehr>0x81020073</nativehr><nativestack></nativestack>]
       Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.GetFileAndMetaInfo(String bstrUrl, Byte bPageView, Byte bPageMode, Byte bGetBuildDependencySet, String bstrCurrentFolderUrl, Int32 iRequestVersion, Byte bMainFileRequest, Boolean& pbCanCustomizePages,
    Boolean& pbCanPersonalizeWebParts, Boolean& pbCanAddDeleteWebParts, Boolean& pbGhostedDocument, Boolean& pbDefaultToPersonal, Boolean& pbIsWebWelcomePage, String& pbstrSiteRoot, Guid& pgSiteId, UInt32& pdwVersion, String&
    pbstrTimeLastModified, String& pbstrContent, UInt32& pdwPartCount, Object& pvarMetaData, Object& pvarMultipleMeetingDoclibRootFolders, String& pbstrRedirectUrl, Boolean& pbObjectIsList, Guid& pgListId, UInt32& pdwItemId, Int64&
    pllListFlags, Boolean& pbAccessDenied, Guid& pgDocid, Byte& piLevel, UInt64& ppermMask, Object& pvarBuildDependencySet, UInt32& pdwNumBuildDependencies, Object& pvarBuildDependencies, String& pbstrFolderUrl, String& pbstrContentTypeOrder,
    Guid& pgDocScopeId) +0
       Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.GetFileAndMetaInfo(String bstrUrl, Byte bPageView, Byte bPageMode, Byte bGetBuildDependencySet, String bstrCurrentFolderUrl, Int32 iRequestVersion, Byte bMainFileRequest, Boolean& pbCanCustomizePages,
    Boolean& pbCanPersonalizeWebParts, Boolean& pbCanAddDeleteWebParts, Boolean& pbGhostedDocument, Boolean& pbDefaultToPersonal, Boolean& pbIsWebWelcomePage, String& pbstrSiteRoot, Guid& pgSiteId, UInt32& pdwVersion, String&
    pbstrTimeLastModified, String& pbstrContent, UInt32& pdwPartCount, Object& pvarMetaData, Object& pvarMultipleMeetingDoclibRootFolders, String& pbstrRedirectUrl, Boolean& pbObjectIsList, Guid& pgListId, UInt32& pdwItemId, Int64&
    pllListFlags, Boolean& pbAccessDenied, Guid& pgDocid, Byte& piLevel, UInt64& ppermMask, Object& pvarBuildDependencySet, UInt32& pdwNumBuildDependencies, Object& pvarBuildDependencies, String& pbstrFolderUrl, String& pbstrContentTypeOrder,
    Guid& pgDocScopeId) +727
    [SPException: The file or folder name contains characters that are not permitted.  Please use a different name.]
       Microsoft.SharePoint.SPGlobal.HandleComException(COMException comEx) +42520506
       Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.GetFileAndMetaInfo(String bstrUrl, Byte bPageView, Byte bPageMode, Byte bGetBuildDependencySet, String bstrCurrentFolderUrl, Int32 iRequestVersion, Byte bMainFileRequest, Boolean& pbCanCustomizePages,
    Boolean& pbCanPersonalizeWebParts, Boolean& pbCanAddDeleteWebParts, Boolean& pbGhostedDocument, Boolean& pbDefaultToPersonal, Boolean& pbIsWebWelcomePage, String& pbstrSiteRoot, Guid& pgSiteId, UInt32& pdwVersion, String&
    pbstrTimeLastModified, String& pbstrContent, UInt32& pdwPartCount, Object& pvarMetaData, Object& pvarMultipleMeetingDoclibRootFolders, String& pbstrRedirectUrl, Boolean& pbObjectIsList, Guid& pgListId, UInt32& pdwItemId, Int64&
    pllListFlags, Boolean& pbAccessDenied, Guid& pgDocid, Byte& piLevel, UInt64& ppermMask, Object& pvarBuildDependencySet, UInt32& pdwNumBuildDependencies, Object& pvarBuildDependencies, String& pbstrFolderUrl, String& pbstrContentTypeOrder,
    Guid& pgDocScopeId) +42753829
       Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.GetWebPartPageContent(Uri pageUrl, Int32 pageVersion, PageView requestedView, HttpContext context, Boolean forRender, Boolean includeHidden, Boolean mainFileRequest, Boolean fetchDependencyInformation, Boolean& ghostedPage,
    String& siteRoot, Guid& siteId, Int64& bytes, Guid& docId, UInt32& docVersion, String& timeLastModified, Byte& level, Object& buildDependencySetData, UInt32& dependencyCount, Object& buildDependencies, SPWebPartCollectionInitialState&
    initialState, Object& oMultipleMeetingDoclibRootFolders, String& redirectUrl, Boolean& ObjectIsList, Guid& listId) +1814
       Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPRequestModuleData.FetchWebPartPageInformationForInit(HttpContext context, SPWeb spweb, Boolean mainFileRequest, String path, Boolean impersonate, Boolean& isAppWeb, Boolean& fGhostedPage, Guid&
    docId, UInt32& docVersion, String& timeLastModified, SPFileLevel& spLevel, String& masterPageUrl, String& customMasterPageUrl, String& webUrl, String& siteUrl, Guid& siteId, Object& buildDependencySetData, SPWebPartCollectionInitialState&
    initialState, String& siteRoot, String& redirectUrl, Object& oMultipleMeetingDoclibRootFolders, Boolean& objectIsList, Guid& listId, Int64& bytes) +38450956
       Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPRequestModuleData.GetFileForRequest(HttpContext context, SPWeb web, Boolean exclusion, String virtualPath) +561
       Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPRequestModule.InitContextWeb(HttpContext context, SPWeb web) +306
       Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls.SPControl.SPWebEnsureSPControl(HttpContext context) +1043
       Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPRequestModule.GetContextWeb(HttpContext context) +27
       Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPRequestModule.PostResolveRequestCacheHandler(Object oSender, EventArgs ea) +1454
       System.Web.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() +80
       System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +165

    Hi,
    According to your post, my understanding is that you got an error when you search in the Community Portal.
    Did you install the March Public Update?
    In my environment, I had installed the March Public Update, and I used the search box in the Community Portal, it worked well.
    You can install the March PU, then check whether it works.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Jason
    Jason Guo
    TechNet Community Support

  • Community sites, Discussion List

    I created site from Community Site Template and  activated publishing features.
    On the Welcome Page(publishing page) there is Discussion XSLTListViewWebpart - OOB webpart. In this case from Settings menu if I click 'Edit Page' nothing happens. I have found work around: first make Check out from Page tab, then Edit.
    If I remove this webpart from publishing page everything works perfect.
    Has anybody faced with such issue of Sharepoint Community Sites with activated Publishing features?
    I will appreciate any answers

    Hi,    
    I tried to reproduce this issue in my environment, it turns out that all works as normal.
    I suggest you create a new Community site and do the test in the Internet Explorer.
    Feel free to reply if the issue still exists.
    Best regards
    Patrick Liang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Issue with AjaxControlToolkit for SharePoint 2013 Blog site template.

    Hi,
    Please find below the details of issue -
    History - We are working with SharePoint 2013 and we are using AjaxControlToolkit in our project. Basically this is a migration project from MOSS to SharePoint 2013. So we have migrated code MOSS to SharePoint 2013. Previously in MOSS project, AjaxControlToolkit
    was used so after migrating we have also used AjaxControlToolkit with updated version which can work in SharePoint 2013. This is working fine now.
    Scenario - There is one web application in SharePoint 2013 farm. Under this web application there are two site collections. One site collection is created with Team site template and second site collection is created with Blog site template.
    There are three feature in our wsp that we have created. One feature is at web application scope (which will do web.config modifications and it will add below entry in web.config file through SPWebConfigModification in section 'configuration/system.web/compilation/assemblies'
     <add assembly="AjaxcontrolToolkit, Version=4.5.7.725, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=28f01b0e84b6d53e" />  
    ). And there are two site collection features.
    Now when we deploy our solution (wsp) to web application in SharePoint 2013 farm and activate the Web.Config modification feature which is at web application level, it has added above mentioned entry in web.config file.
    Our application in first site collection is working fine which we are expecting but in the second site collection which is created using out of box Blog site template, 'comment box' and Post button are invisible as shown in below screen shot -
    If we remove below entry from web.config file -
    <add assembly="AjaxcontrolToolkit, Version=4.5.7.725, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=28f01b0e84b6d53e" /> 
    and refresh the Blog site page then the Comment box and Post button is appearing again as shown in below screen shot -
    We also tried with updated versions of AjaxControlToolkit (Version=4.5.7.1005 & 4.5.7.1213) but no success.
    I will highly appreciate if you could help me in this.
    Thanks for your time.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Rajendra Gaikwad.

    Hi,
    As you said, the issue only comes with the Blog site template.
    I suggest you take a look at this blog about how to make Ajax Control Toolkit work with SharePoint 2013:
    http://andreaswijayablog.blogspot.com/2013/12/ajax-control-toolkit-with-sharepoint.html
    Another similar thread for your reference:
    http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/60fa19fe-86a0-446b-b61f-11a82fe4287f/how-to-implement-ajax-toolkit-for-sharepoint2013?forum=sharepointdevelopment
    Thanks
    Patrick Liang
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they
    help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet
    Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]
    Patrick Liang
    TechNet Community Support

  • SP2013 - Date Filter Web Part looses connection when used in a site template

    Hi,
    I created two table reports in SQL Reporting Services 2012 and inserted in a web page using the Reporting Service Report viewer in SharePoint 2013 with CU Dez 2013. The two reports require two dates and I use two date filter web parts (I did not try the
    date range solution I saw in the fórum).
    So the user inputs the two dates in date filters that send the information to thereports in the same page.
    They work in the site and I saved it as template. However when I create e new site using it as a templates, the date filter connections are broken and of course, they did not work.
    For another report where I usea text filter, it worked without any problem in the template.
    Does anybody know any workaround?
    Thank you.
    Best regards, Ricardo Segawa - Segawas Projetos / Microsoft Partner

    Hi ,
    The new site based on the saved site template will generate new ID for date filter web part, in the web part page the SPWebPartConnection "ProviderID" value seems still to reference the original date filter web part ID (see from
    SharePoint Designer), as a workaround we can re-configure the web part connection from the web part page manually or programmatically from that new site web part page.
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/8d98206d-b41f-4ee4-b537-a4bf5cec0434/sharepoint-2010-save-site-as-template-webpart-connections-broken?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious
    http://sympmarc.com/2007/09/20/removing-a-web-part-connection-in-sharepoint/
    Thank
    Daniel Yang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Issue with site template that contains a document library with a lookup column to another list

    I have a document library called Proposals with a lookup column in the same site called Document Categories (multiple values allowed).  It points to a list called document categories.  I have several sample documents in the Proposal Library that
    contain valid document categories.  When I save the site as a template and instantiate it, everything is fine.  However, when I remove the sample documents from the Proposal library and rebuild the site template, I can't get the  template to
    create another site.  I get an error Unable To Open Lookup List.
    I don't understand why I can instantiate a site from the template when there's sample data, but not when the document library containing the lookup column is empty.
    Does SharePoint 2010 site template support lookup columns?
    Why would it make a difference if the library is empty?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    According to your description, my understanding is that the error occurred when you created a site from the template with no files in the document library.
    I tested the same scenario per your post, and I can create a site from the template with no files in the document library with no errors.
    To solve this issue, I recommend to verify the things below:
    Did you save the site as a template with Include Content checked? If yes, I recommend to test if it works when saving the site as a template with Include Content unchecked.
    Test the same scenario with a new site to narrow the issue scope.
    I also recommend to check the event log and ULS log to see if anything unexpected occurred.
    To check event log, click the Start button and type “Event Viewer” in the Search box.
    For SharePoint 2010, by default, ULS log is at C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\14\LOGS.
    You can check the ULS log by the methods here:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/opal/archive/2009/12/22/uls-viewer-for-sharepoint-2010-troubleshooting.aspx
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg193966(v=office.14).aspx
    Best regards.
    Thanks
    Victoria Xia
    TechNet Community Support

  • Is this a bug? Document Library view has the wrong 'Show in Folders' option when created from custom site template.

    I have a site with the default document library.
    I add views to the library, some ask for the items to be shown in folders, some not.
    I create a site template via the SharePoint UI.
    I create a new site.
    In the new site, the library exists, the views exist, but all the views are set to show the items in folders.
    Does anyone else have this problem? Is there a patch or any workaround?

    Hi  ,
    According to your description, my understanding is that view property "show all items without folders" is not preserved in packaging and is lost after we create a site using the saved site template.
    For your issue, I can reproduce your scenario in my environment. It should be caused by the scope attribute is missing. For a workaround, you can try to crack the site template wsp, add the missing scope
    attribute to the View schema in the list schema.xml.
    Also, I recommend you open up a ticket for deep investigation.
    Thanks,
    Eric
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Eric Tao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Remove reference to Publishing Feature from site template

    Hi all, I have a custom site collection which I package as a wsp to deploy as a custom solution template to multiple sites.
    Accidentally, years ago I've activated Publishing Features in my site template and then disabled them. I still work and create new templates from my site without any problems (ShP 2010).
    Now, I've installed SharePoint 2013 and updated my site template to 2013. Then, I've created the new wsp but when I try to apply my template to a new site collection I receive an error message: "Failed to instantiate file "AlternateMediaPlayer.xaml"
    from module "Style LibraryMedia Player_Features\PublishingResources": Source path "Features\PublishingResources\AlternateMediaPlayer.xaml" not found."
    How could I remove all the reference to features belonging to Publishing Features?

    Hi Elena_B,
    According to your description, my understanding is that you want to remove reference to publishing feature from site template in SharePoint 2013.
    You can do as the followings:
    extract all files from WSP file by (a tool or) changing the wsp file to cab file and then extract all files to a working folder.
    edit the Onet.xml file to remove the unsupported features and save the changes.
    create a ddf file for makecab.exe to repack the wsp
    run cmd: makecab /f my.ddf to generate the new WSP file
    More information, please refer to the link:
    http://lassewikmark.wordpress.com/2009/11/16/howto-remove-unused-features-from-a-site-template-file/
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/37e96410-7fb9-462b-a3e7-c150f2de7107/site-template-and-disabled-feature?forum=sharepointadminprevious
    I hope this helps.
    Thanks,
    Wendy
    Wendy Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • "Start this workflow to approve publishing a major version of an item" in Project Site templates

    Hi
    I created a document library with the "Start this workflow to approve publishing a major version of an item" on, and saved the site as a template. However when I create instances using that project site template, the document library doesn't
    have the "Start this workflow to approve publishing a major version of an item" option on, like the site that was used for the template have.
    Is this option not possible to save on a project site template?
    Here are the steps I did:
    On a document library I set the versioning for major and minor version
    I create an “Publishing approval” workflow and set it to “Start this workflow to approve publishing on a major version”.
    But when I create a project instance of this type, the document library on the project site has the “Start this workflow to approve publishing on a major version” turned off.
    Thanks!
    Best regards

    Hi,
    I recommend to create a  WebProvisioned event receiver.
    We need to create an event handler and register it with the Web Provisioned event. In the event, we need to find the specific Library and set SPList.DefaultContentApprovalWorkflowId property.
    When the site is provisioned, the event handler is activated. Then the "Start this workflow to approve publishing a major version of an item" option will be checked.
    More information:
    SPWebEventReceiver.WebProvisioned method (Microsoft.SharePoint)
    SPList.DefaultContentApprovalWorkflowId property (Microsoft.SharePoint)
    Attaching Web Event to perform operations after creating the web (Event Receiver Concept)
    Best Regards,
    Linda Li
    Linda Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • Site template without inherited permissions

    Can I not create a site template with permissions inheritance off. When I break inheritance, create a template based on that site, then create a new site based on that template then inheritance is back on again......that's bad
    Seems like that would be a core need for site templates.

    Hi,
    According to your post, my understanding is that when you create a new site based on the template then inheritance is back on again.
    When you create a new site, if you seelect “Use same permissions as parent site”, it will inheritant permissions.
    I recommend to check “Use unique pernussions” to create your own permissions.
    Linda Li                
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Linda Li
    TechNet Community Support
    Is it possible to set those permissions within the template itself so the user doesnt have to set that up when creating an instance?

  • Built-in moderation facility in community site collection

    hi,
     Would like to know what are the Built-in moderation facility features available in community site collection template and its subsites.
    help is appreciated

    A good response to this is the summary of what a community site is from this
    NBSP Community Site summary article.  I'll quote directly from it for your ease of reading
    Feature
    Description
    Discussions
    Members can post an opinion or question to
    start a new discussion. Other members can reply to and like the post. The member
    that started the discussion has the ability to mark a chosen response as the
    ‘Best Reply’. Moderators have the ability to mark a chosen discussion as a
    ‘Featured Discussion’.
    Categories
    Members can create categories to organise
    their discussions. When a new discussion is posted it can be assigned a category
    which other users can filter by.
    Badges and Reputation
    Moderators can assign badges to members to
    indicate their status within the community, e.g. Subject Expert. Members can
    earn reputation by posting in discussions and through recognition by other
    members of their posts (e.g. when their content is liked or marked as a best
    answer).
    Members
    A list of all members, including their
    badges and reputation earned, is held on the community site. Community Sites can
    be set to allow any new users to join or an approval process can be set to
    manage new members.
    Hope that helps.
    Steven Andrews
    SharePoint Business Analyst: LiveNation Entertainment
    Blog: baron72.wordpress.com
    Twitter: Follow @backpackerd00d
    My Wiki Articles:
    CodePlex Corner Series
    Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves (or helps) your problem.

  • Need suggestions for upgrading discontinued site templates.

    I'm currently working on migrating our MOSS 07 site to SharePoint 2013 (using 3rd party software). I have a site template that i'm not sure what i should convert/upgrade it too.
    I have a Budgeting and Tracking Multiple Projects (PROJMULTI#0) site template. What would be an equivalent or similar template that I could convert this too?
    Thanks
    James T.F

    Hi James,
    Quote from
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc263203(v=office.15).aspx "Fabulous 40" application templates:
    Microsoft is not creating new versions of these templates. Environments that contain sites based on these templates can be upgraded as long as the templates are installed. But there might be issues when you try to upgrade the site collections. Make sure
    that you test each site before you upgrade the production environment.
    There are some links for upgrade these templates to SharePoint 2010 environments:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/tothesharepoint/archive/2010/08/18/sharepoint-2010-products-upgrade-and-the-fabulous-40-application-templates.aspx
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sharepointdev/archive/2012/06/01/migrating-the-sharepoint-2007-fab-40-templates-to-sharepoint-2010.aspx
    Also a link for deploy 2010 solution in 2013:
    http://www.learningsharepoint.com/2013/03/24/deploy-sharepoint-2010-solutions-in-sharepoint-2013/
    You could refer to the link below to upgrade your SharePoint 2007 to SharePoint 2010, then upgrade it to SharePoint 2013:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee947141.aspx
    Regards,
    Rebecca Tu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Weird issue with Site Template in O365

    Hi,
    I ran into a weird issue while working with Site Template in O365 last night.
    I created a sub-site in a Site Collection with some Site Columns, CT and Lists. Then I saved it as a Site Template so that it can be used for different sites. Then I created 3 different sub-sites using the template. All went good.
    After some time when I looked at the sites, something really irritating happened. I saw the first two sites were missing all the site columns and CT. And the latest third site had 3 copies of each Site Column and CT.  Though for the first two sites,
    all the CT, Site Columns were available at List level, but it wad just the reference. The Actual CT was not seen the site settings.
    This is the first time I saw this kind of issue. Not sure what is the reason for this.
    Any idea around this ?
    Thanks,
    Nutan
    Nutan Sharma

    Hi,
    According to your description, my understanding is that the error occurred when you created a site from the template with no files in the document library.
    I tested the same scenario per your post, and I can create a site from the template with no files in the document library with no errors.
    To solve this issue, I recommend to verify the things below:
    Did you save the site as a template with Include Content checked? If yes, I recommend to test if it works when saving the site as a template with Include Content unchecked.
    Test the same scenario with a new site to narrow the issue scope.
    I also recommend to check the event log and ULS log to see if anything unexpected occurred.
    To check event log, click the Start button and type “Event Viewer” in the Search box.
    For SharePoint 2010, by default, ULS log is at C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\14\LOGS.
    You can check the ULS log by the methods here:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/opal/archive/2009/12/22/uls-viewer-for-sharepoint-2010-troubleshooting.aspx
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg193966(v=office.14).aspx
    Best regards.
    Thanks
    Victoria Xia
    TechNet Community Support

  • Assign Values to Category column in custom Site template by using save a s template method

    Hi All,
    I am trying to develop a new custom site/web template in SharePoint 2013. In the site  I  have used Issue tracking list. I rename Issue status  to Risk status. In the category column I gave my custom values e.g.
    <CHOICE>Change Management</CHOICE>
                        <CHOICE>Funding</CHOICE>
                        <CHOICE>Global Communication</CHOICE>
                        <CHOICE>Implementation</CHOICE>
                        <CHOICE>Interdependencies</CHOICE>
                        <CHOICE>Objectives</CHOICE>
                        <CHOICE>Organizational Culture</CHOICE>
                        <CHOICE>Resource Availability</CHOICE>
                        <CHOICE>Sponsorship</CHOICE>
                        <CHOICE>Supportability</CHOICE>
                        <CHOICE>Technical</CHOICE>
    I saved the site as template and uploaded the custom template into site collection. When I created a new site based on the custom template I noticed Risk status has been renamed to default Issue status and category  column has default values e.g. category
    1 category 2 etc. How can I fix it  ? Your help will be highly appreciated

    Hi,
    As the error message suggests, it is not supported to add this app into a site template. To work around this issue, it is recommended to remove this app from your
    site before saving it as template.
    The KB article below would provide more details about this issue:
    https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2885566?wa=wsignin1.0
    To install this app to the specific sites you want in a batch, administrators can also use the App Catalog to push apps to specific site collections, managed paths,
    and site templates.
    More information about this:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/richard_dizeregas_blog/archive/2013/03/04/sharepoint-2013-app-deployment-through-quot-app-stapling-quot.aspx
    https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/fp179896.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
    I would also suggest you submit a feedback to the Office Developer Platform if there any expectation about the future version of Office 365 SharePoint Online:
    http://officespdev.uservoice.com/
    It
    is a place for customers provide feedback about Microsoft Office products. What’s more, if a feedback is high voted there by other customers, it will be promising that Microsoft
    Product Team will take it into consideration when designing the next version in the future.
    Thanks 
    Patrick Liang
    TechNet Community Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
    [email protected]

  • Data type change made to schema.xml of comments list which is part of blog site template is not reflecting in the existing site but working fine when new site is created.

    Hi,
    I have created a blog site with the available site template few days back. Now we have the requirement of having the attachments in the body of the comments section. 
    So, I updated the schema.xml of the comments list available under ../templates/blog/lists/comments/schema.xml to have rich text for the Body field.
    With this change, I created a new site and it was working fine. Change is reflected in the new blog site.
    However, this particular change is not reflected in the existing blog site. Any changes made to the schema.xml is not effecting the old blog site.
    Can anyone suggest what can be done for the change to be reflected in the old blog site?
    Thanks in Advance,
    Regards, Keerthi Suryadevara

    Hi,
    According to your post, my understanding is that you wanted to add attachments in the body of the comments section.
    You can add the the Code inside the Default list pages. For more information, you can refer to:
    Enable Attachment in SharePoint Blog post list and display the list Attachments
    In addition, you can add an enhanced rich text field to the comment list and remove the body field. Then you can insert files into comments, too.
    Here is a similar thread for your reference:
    http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/77194/how-to-add-attachments-for-comments-list-in-sharepoint-blog-2010
    Best Regards,
    Linda Li
    Linda Li
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for

  • Audio Jack of my HP Envy 4 is not working anymore

    Hi all,             I have purchased HP Envy 4 just a 4 months ago and now something worong with its audio jack for headphone and its not working anymore. The hardware profile for this audio jack shows no error but its still not working. Is there any

  • ICloud - is it possible to disable that feature after downloading Maverick OS X?

    I have a Mac desktop with OS X 10.8.5 and an iPhoto library of 10,500 photos. The version of iPhoto is 8.1.2 and there has been some 'conflict' between the two so apparently I have to first dowload the latest OS X (Maverick) so I can then down load t

  • Immediate TO creation

    Dear WM gurus. We are trying to create immediate TO for a GR for a purchase order.We have maintained the setting of immediate TO creation in config in LE-WM in movement types . when we do the GR we see that only TR is created and TO is not created. K

  • HT4561 how can update my mac os 10.6.8?

    pease tell me how can i upgrade my macbook from mac os 10.6.8 to present

  • AppleFileServer process keeps hanging - stalls clients' AFP connections

    Since moving to SL Server (first used on 10.6.4, now 10.6.6), Mac clients have been complaining of spinning beachballs when accessing the server. This appears to have gradually got worse over time, as more of the clients have been upgraded from Tiger