Company code clearing

While processing for intercompany process below mentioned error has occurred,
No accounts maintained for company code clearing between comp codes XYZ to ABC.

Hi,
I think you didn't maintained any account for the clearing purpose for intercompany transactions between XYZ and ABC.
Please maintain atleast one clearing a/c for IC transactions.
BR

Similar Messages

PGI-No Accounts maintained for company code clearing between company codes

Dear Expetrs,
When i am doing PGI getting error that is no accts maintained for company code clearing between 0010 to 0035. This is intercompany process. In our intercompany company codes is 0010 and 0020. So we maintained already clearing acconuts between 0010 and 0020 in OBYA. But when am doing post goods issue... getting error no accts maintained between 0010 to 0035. Actually here supposed to take clearing accts between 0010 to 0020. I couldnt understand why its taking 0010 to 0035. Could you please suggest me where i did mistake, Please suggest me ASAP.
Tanks & Regards,
VS

Dear Lakshmipathi,
Here am pasted the OBYA Screen...whatever i maintain pls check and suggest me. i am suspecting on Debit posting kes and credit posting keys maintain as 01 and 31 is corect.
Transaction          BUV   Clearing between company codes
Posted in             0016
Cleared against       0013
Debit posting key    01                  Credit posting key   31
Account debit        7790000013          Account credit       7720000013
Posted in             0013
Cleared against       0016
Debit posting key    01                  Credit posting key   31
Account debit        7790000016          Account credit       7720000016
Thanks & Regards,
Vasu

No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds

Hi All,
I have the following issue when trying to carry out inventory clearing using LI21.
When I carry this out for Plant B all is OK.
When I try it for Plant 'A' I get the following error.
No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds A and B.
When I clear inventory from plant A why would the system look at plant B?
This does not occur when clearing from plant 'B'.
I am convinced it must be a WM setup issue, but could be FI.
I am not a WM guy but need to resolve this issue.
Thanks
Stuart

In LI21 system will pick up the quantity from storage type 999.
It will clear this storage type and tie up the WM-IM stock for a particular plant.
This error message which u have mentioned usually comes when u are doing a stock transfer between 2 plants in different company codes.
system looks for a GL account in transaction type BUV in tcode OBYA.
Check this setting also .

No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds RTIL and RCP

Dear sir
i am stock transfer in one plant ot another plant on 301MVT use in MB1B t code that time below error is showing
No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds RTIL and RCPL.

Hi,Since you are doing 301 for plants in 2 different company codes you need to maintain CC clearing account,it will not required if do this scenario in same company code, Maintain the Company code Clearing account between 2 company codes through transaction OBYA with proper GL account.

No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds 1000 and 000

Dear all,
I am doing STO between company codes with UB doc type, and I am getting error as " No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds 1000 and 0001."
how to resolve this. plz give steps?
Regards,
Prashanth

Hi...
AS per me OBYA is the Transaction code to maintain account
determination for Cross company code Transactions.
Plz go ahed & confirm.
S..tosh.

No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds 8490 and 062

Hi,
Error when iam doing the PGI:
No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds 8490 and 0627.
What settins are missings. This delivery is normal delivery only.

Hi,
If you are doing intercompany transaction then you need to assign GL accounts in tcode OBYA.

Cross company code clearing between vendors

Hi,
I have 2 vendor incoice (KR)in company code 2000. Vendor No. 625001. I am also having vendor 625001 in company code 1000. In company code 1000, I have vendor Payment KZ document.
I have to clear CC 2000 vendors by using CC1000 vendor.
Note: In OBYA setting, this vendor is not given. Some other vendor, Customer and GL account are given. Please help me out for this issue.
Thanks.

Hello Kannusamy,
A very legitimate requirement sometimes of this kind given the complex business process we have in the modern times!
Do the following from an accounting perspective:
1) check whether your bank clearing accounts allow manual posting based on the configuration or use suspense account
2) pay both vendors in Co.2000 and keep the payment in either clearing or suspense account
3) assume co.1000 is setup as a debtor also in co.2000. post the payment to this account which clears everything in co. 2000
4) In Co. 1000 raise a vendor invoice to settle payment i.e KZ doc. amount in vendor's account and you may have co.2000 account setup as vendor and via clearing/suspense account take the balance to Co.2000 vendor account.
The above step will leave interco-balance which should be treated according to the organisation's local procedures.
Hope this provides more.
CONMJI

Company code clearing substitution

We want to use different receivable/payable accounts to clear cross company postings via KALC. One set for situation A and another for situration B. OBYA only allows one combination. Any ideas?

hi it is working correctly but one thinge remember for suppose u have four company codes like A,B,C,D
first u can assign thru obya A and B and second time u can assign A and C third time A and D fourth time u can assign B and C fifth time u can assign B and D sixth time C and D like tha u can do it is working.

Clearing between company codes

Hi Experts,
I have done necessary settings for cross company code clearing.
I got the following error message while clearing the open items between company codes.
Error Message:
Company codes have different settings for withholding tax treatment.
Message no. F5786
Please help me to solve this issue.
Thanks

Hi,
I think you have entered a document containing at least one vendor or customer item and which has line items in several company codes.
The extended withholding tax treatment has been set to active in one company code and not in other company code. That is EWT has been activated in one company code and the same has not been activated in other company code. We need to activate EWT in other cross company code.
Path to activate / deactivate EWT:
IMG / FA/Financial Accounting Global Settings / Withholding Tax / Extended Withholding Tax / Calculation / India / Company Code/Activate Extended Withholding Tax
Here select the check box u201CEWTu201D against your company code and save it.
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Kannusamy S

Payroll Posting to multiple Company Codes in FI and CO possible?

Dear experts,
I need your help on the following challenging issue with respect to payroll posting to accounting.
Is it possible for a payroll that runs in one company code for all employees, to post to FI and CO for multiple CoCds?
Example:
WT 1234 exists in HR CoCd 1000 (assume an amount of u20AC 100 in the payroll results)
G/L ABC exists in FI CoCd 1000
G/L DEF exists in FI CoCd 2000
CCtr xyz exists in CO CoCd 1000 (which is the employee's master cost centre)
CCtr uvw exists in CO CoCd 2000
The wage type should be mapped as follows:
+ 100 to G/L ABC and CCtr xyz (this is no problem, is realized with standard mapping)
- 100 to G/L DEF and CCtr uvw
The challenge is in the fact that the credit amount should go to another company code than the debit amount.
How can I realize this?
Thanks in advance for your feedback!
Jeroen

This is from SAP documentation:
Cross-company code transactions are characterized by the fact that payables are assigned to a company code other than the one in which the corresponding expenses arose. This results in receivables and payables between company codes.
If you want to post these receivables and payables to company code clearing accounts, you must make the settings in several steps, as outlined in the following.
Note that in the case of separate HR/AC systems, posting to company code clearing accounts can only be implemented if the AC system is in Release 4.5A or higher.
For more information on cross-company code transactions and business considerations, refer to the SAP Library under Payroll -> country -> Subsequent Activities -> Posting to Accounting -> Special Business Requirements for Posting -> Cross-Company Code Transactions.
Settings for Posting to Company Code Clearing Accounts
1. In the step Define Symbolic Accounts, you must assign an account determination type to each symbolic account in Human Resources. For specific postings to balance sheet accounts, the account assign types FL and FO are used. From a technical viewpoint, these account assignments are defined as follows:
Wage types that are assigned to a symbolic account with account assignment type FL are posted in accordance with the information from the last period in the WPBP table (Work Center Basic Pay) for the current original result.
Wage types that are assigned to a symbolic account with account assignment type FO are only used for posting in the evaluation of a current original result.
2. In the step Define Posting Characteristics of Wage Types, you must assign the symbolic accounts with the account assignment types FL and FO to the corresponding wage types:
You assign the symbolic accounts with account assignment type FL to wage types that, in the case of retroactive accounting, contain the difference between old and new payment amounts. In countries that use the principle of origin, this usually involves wage types /551 Recalculation difference and /552 Subsequent clearing from previous month.
You assign symbolic accounts with the account assignment type FO to wage types that contain payments to employees and whose amounts do not change in the case of retroactive accounting. This usually involves wage types /557 Cash payment, /558 Payment of balance, /559 Transfer and other, country-specific wage types.
3. In the step Create Posting Variants, you must set the Post to company-code clearing account indicator for the variants that you use. Otherwise, payables and receivables between company codes are not posted to company code clearing accounts, and remain as the balance on the document split account for the company codes affected.

Cross company code downpayment posting error

Hi,
When I am posting cross company code downpayment in F-48 getting below error.
"Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled".
Vendor A/c (Company A)
Bank clearing A/c(Company B) - Profit center 25000
Problem it is not deriving the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c. I have used document type KZ, check boxes "intercompany postings" and "trading partner" are activated in this document type.
Default profit center has made for Bank clearing A/c and Cross company code clearing A/c. Assigned Profit center 25000 for Company A also.
Kindly advice where I am wrong, which is the correct document type to post the Cross company code transactions (Down payment:F-48, charging-off GL open item to Vendor) to derive the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c? Or
How can I configure in New GL that the profit center should get derived from the Cross company code clearing A/c for above cross company code transactions?
Best regards
Shanid

Hi Atif,
Thanks again for your reply.
Since we have made Profit center as mandatory in New GL charactristcs this will give the priority to enter the Profit center as
Mandatory. As I mentioned earlier we required profit center in all lines.
I have tried whatever you have said, still it is not working.
It will be great if you give a solution for this.
Regards
Shanu

Document splitting issues in Cross company code scenario

Hi
We have the following business scenario:
(Please note : Document splitting with Real time CO-FI integration is active)
1)one company(say, Co.code X) purchases on behalf of another group
company(Co.code Y)
2)the cost center of Co.code Y is given in the 'Account assignment' tab
in the Purchase order created in 'X'.
3)The PO is created in foreign currency
4)So, when the Goods receipt happens, the expense posting is happening
in Co.code Y and the GRIR entry is in X.
5)When the invoice is posted in co.code X, the Vendor Open item (in
foreign currency) gets created in X.
6)The problem occurs when Forex.valuation is done for the Vendor open
item. The Forex.gain/loss is getting posted in Co.code X by deriving
the Cost object from the expense posting in Co.code Y. Now, the system
is giving an error message 'CO object doesnt belong to X co.code'
I beleive this is the way document splitting normally works by deriving
the CO object form the original expense posting onto the subsequent
documents but I guess, it is failing in this scenario. Please let me
know if there is a work around to resolve this issue.
Regards
Ravi

We normally do the independent splitting of documents in respective company codes (This being the limitation mentioned by SAP for cross company code postings).
In the document split configuration, for Define document splitting rule, check for the leading item for cross company code transactions, and check for the item categories to be edited. The following two entries will be there
1100 Company Code Clearing CC = CC of leading item
1100 Company Code Clearing CC <> CC of leading item
In case of independent splitting, remove the first entry and check.
Thanks and Regards,
Mamta Sarda

Error in posting when transfer to a new personnel area / company code

Dear Experts,
We have a scenario where we have a transfer action for some of employees to a new personnel area (also new company code). When we post the result to accounting, we have an error like this : "Company code clearing account not found in co. code A for co. code B". I can see that the program is trying to post to both old and new company codes. I know that it might be a missing configuration in FI sides, but is it normal to post to both company codes. Logically it should post only to the new company code right ? Unless of course there is a retro run from the old company, but there isn't.
Please advise.
Thanks and regards,
Arief

Ask ur controlling person reagarding this how he want to get
because generally there shd be two GL here for this scenario which is assigned to two company code
ask them how they have configured

Transfer Posting between plant to plant under 2 company codes

Hello all,
I have 2 company codes 9002 and 2850.
Under 9002 there is a plant 9002 with storage location WHSE.
Under 2850 there is a plant 3105 with storage location WHSE.
Whenever I am moving a material from plant 3105 to 9002, I am getting the following error in the system:
No accts maintained for company code clearing between comp.cds 9002 and 2850.
The system clearly requires a configuration to solve this error. But my doubt is, is there any other way by which I can solve this error without making any new configuration??? My client does not need any configuration but wants this error to be resolved. Is there any way???
Kindly advise.
Thanks and Regards,
Umakanth.

This is absolutely a SAP standard error which can be easily solved by FI guys.
Though I dont remember the transaction code now but it becomes necessary to maintain clearing accounts between two company codes for accounting consistency.
Please convince your client and get it done from FI guys. You will have to show your consulting skills here.

Cross Company Code purchasing

Hi,
Please help me to concept of Cross Company Code purchasing .
I need a Document regarding this or configuration setting , its requirement from one of our client.
So pls send me some document about the Cross Company Code Transaction.
Thanks
Mukesh

Hi,
Refer to the link given below.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/4d/4b9036dfe4b703e10000009b38f889/frameset.htm
Even when the plants involved in a stock transfer belong to different company codes, you can use conventional methods to transfer the stock:
By transferring the stock between plants in one or two steps
By carrying out a stock transport order without the delivery function via Shipping
By carrying out a stock transport order with the delivery function via Shipping
In these cases, the value of the transfer posting is posted to a company code clearing account in both the issuing and the receiving plants. The stock transfer is posted at the valuation price of the material in the issuing plant.
Stock Transport Order with Delivery Via Shipping and Billing Document/Invoice
You can carry out stock transfers with the delivery and billing function. In this procedure, the stock is transferred in the form of a sale between two plants.
Stock transfers that include deliveries and billing documents/invoices are only possible between plants belonging to different company codes.
If you want to carry out a cross-company-code stock transport order with delivery but without a billing document, you must set the Relevant for Billing (data element FKREL) indicator in Customizing of the item type to "blank" (Not relevant for billing).
When you use the delivery function in Shipping, the whole transaction - from the delivery through billing and invoice verification - is reflected in the system. The following Shipping functions are available for this:
Delivery:
For example, planning shipping activities, picking, packing
Billing:
For example, price determination
Before you can use a stock transport order with the delivery function and a billing document, the plant must be assigned to a vendor. You maintain the vendor - plant assignment in the vendor master record.
If a user enters a vendor when creating a stock transport order, the plant is automatically copied from the vendor master record.
A stock transport order with delivery and billing is a mixture of a standard purchase order and a stock transport order: as in the standard purchase order, when items are entered (standard items with no item category) price determination is carried out and shipping data established; as in the stock transport order, the transfer of stocks from one location to another is monitored.
Stock Transport Order with Valuated and Non-Valuated Sales Order Stock
When entering goods issues for cross-company-code stock transport orders, you can work with both valuated and non-valuated sales order stock (E) using the one-step procedure (movement type 645) and the two-step procedure (movement type 643). In the MRP view of the material master record (MRP 4) you define from which stock material is to be withdrawn by selecting the Dependent requirements indicator for individual and collective requirements. There are three options:
Indicator set to Blank (individual and collective requirements): material is removed from sales order stock
Indicator set to 1 (individual requirements only): material is removed from sales order stock
Indicator set to 2 (collective requirements only): material is removed from unrestricted-use standard stock
Prices
In Purchasing, the price of the material in question is determined in the usual manner (from the info record, for example).
In SD, pricing is also carried out as normal during the billing process.
Your company has to maintain settings in the Customizing system determining whether stock transfers between two plants should be with or without billing.
You can also determine whether individual users can carry out stock transfers, for example, with or without billing or in either of the two ways.
If you choose Purchase Order ® Create ® Stock Transfer (i.e. a stock transport order without billing) and stock transfer with billing has been defined for the plants in Customizing, a message appears indicating that you should create a standard purchase order.
Regards
Ravi Shankar.
Edited by: RAVI SHANKAR H.N on Jan 12, 2009 10:45 AM

Company code clearing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for