Comparision between ECC6  and  verson 4x

Hi,
Can anyone give me the list of additional features available in ECC 6.0 as compared to version 4.x (pertaining to MM module)
In other words, comparison between ECC6.0 & 4.x (related to MM module)
If it is available in pdf or ppt, please send it to my id  ashok dot raj at lntinfotech dot com
regards,
C. ASHOK RAJ

Following are the basic differences as far as MM Module is concerned;
Pickup list - Batch where-used list display in transaction MB56
u2022 Until release 4.7, the top-down and bottom-up analyses in the function pickup list for batch where-used list (transaction MB5C) were displayed only in the form of simple output lists. As of release 6.00 of SAP ERP Central Component, the function pickup list for batch where-used list branches to the batch where-used list itself (transaction MB56).
u2022 In addition, user can define how the data in the batch where-used list is displayed, in the initial screen.
u2022 User can use all the settings available in the batch where-used list. For example, he can expand transfer posting or display vendor batch. However, it is not possible to limit the selection to valid plants in the initial screen of the pickup list.
Usability enhancements for transaction MIGO for the posting of goods movements
u2022 For goods movements that refer to purchase orders as reference documents (for example, goods receipt, goods issue, subsequent adjustment), user can specify the ordering plant as an additional selection criterion directly next to the purchase order number and the item number.
u2022 There is a new default value: "copy account assignment fields." When entering other goods receipts, user can copy existing account assignment data from the previous item to use as the default values for a new item. To do this, user has to set the copy account assignment fields indicator in the default values.
u2022 User changes the default values in the menu path "Settings -> Default Values."
u2022 Goods movement is monitored with reference to a material document. When you enter the following goods movements, it is possible to specify a material document, such as the following, as the reference document:
Goods receipt
Goods issue
Transfer posting
Remove from storage
u2022 Note that these material documents must be documents that have arisen from a goods movement without reference ("Others") and that are not reversal documents.
New report : display list of invoice documents (MIR5)
u2022 Logistics invoice verification offers a new report display list of invoice documents (RMMR1MDI), w hich user can use to display such a list (Transaction is MIR5).
u2022 As an addition to the existing program invoice overview (transaction code MIR6), user have extended selection criteria and display options. For example, on the initial screen user can make selections by one-time customers, invoice gross amount, and entry date.
u2022 User can also show an expert mode, which enables him to select at plant level by FI document, GL A/c posting, and Material Posting.
u2022 In the output list, the report shows both posted and held invoices.
u2022 It does not show invoices without a corresponding FI document; such as invoices planned for verification in the background or which the software has already verified as containing errors.
Requirement prioritizations in materials management
u2022 With Requirement Prioritization functionality user can assign requirement urgency at item level in purchasing and reservation documents.
u2022 The software determines the relevant requirement priority (overall priority) of a material requisition from the combination of requirement urgency group and organizational priority.
Mass maintenance of outline agreements
The following two transactions available:
u2022 Mass maintenance for contracts: transaction code MEMASSCONTRACT
u2022 Mass maintenance for scheduling agreements: transaction code MEMASSSA
Commitment plan for purchase contracts
u2022 With the function of the commitment plan for purchase contracts, it is possible to pre plan value consumption for a purchase contract.
u2022 To this end, a commitment plan is generated for each document item of the relevant contract.
u2022 This commitment plan itself can have any number of items.
u2022 User can define a value and a validity date for each commitment plan item.
u2022 This enables user to pre plan different values for different periods of time.
u2022 The software generates an earmarked fund document for a defined commitment plan item.
u2022 This earmarked funds document can in turn contain several different items with different account assignments.
u2022 The software adopts these account assignments from the item account assignments of the commitment plan.
u2022 If a purchase requisition or purchase order references this contract, the earmarked funds document is copied into the purchase order, and the account assignment is adopted from that document.
u2022 Account assignment to a different account assignment object is then no longer allowed.
Availability check in "Enjoy purchase order and requisition"
u2022 Display and checking of availability are invokable separately in the "Enjoy purchase order and requisition" function, in line with the software behavior on the sales side.
u2022 User invoke the display and checking of availability in the "Enjoy purchase order" function (transaction code ME21N) and the "Enjoy purchase requisition" function (transaction code ME51N) as follows:
To display the availability overview, choose the menu path "Environment -> Availability." - To check availability, choose the "Check Availability" icon.
Until this release, if user carried out the availability check for an item of a stock transport order, the software adopted confirmations as per the desired date/time only.
u2022 Two settings are possible with availability check:
Confirmation as per desired date/time (this is the standard setting and corresponds to previous software behavior)
Delivery proposal - Full confirmation
External services: putting service items in the purchase order on hold (changed)
User can put purchase orders with service items on hold if these items do not contain any errors. Purchase orders with service items can also be put on hold if errors occur only at header level or as a result of the availability check.
Customizing transactions OX18 replaced by view
The assigned customizing transactions have been replaced by the following view in the following implementation guide activity in customizing for the enterprise structure: Assign plant to company code: transaction OX18 replaced by view V_T001K_Assign. One will find this activity in the implementation guide under the menu path "Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Logistics General -> Assign Plant to Company Code."
Goods receipt: new movement types in inventory management
The following new movement types are available in inventory management:
107: Goods receipt to valuated goods receipt blocked stock
109: Goods receipt from valuated goods receipt blocked stock
Prepayment of invoices
This functionality is characterized as follows:
u2022 User can trigger prepayment of vendor invoices in logistics invoice verification.
u2022 User use the prepayment function for vendors with whom organisation has a good, long-standing relationship.
u2022 The function enables payment soon after issue of the invoice and full exploitation of the date of required payment and existing cash discounts, by posting the vendor liabilities, taxes, and cash discounts in financial accounting in advance.
u2022 The software executes the payment of the invoice regardless of the relevant goods receipt and the outcome of the invoice verification check.
u2022 Most logistics invoice verification standard functions are not affected by the prepayment function.
u2022 When the software posts invoices, it continues to execute the standard checks.
u2022 If the software has already posted the prepayment document, user can make only restricted changes to the header fields of the invoice.
u2022 To ensure adequate and orderly financial accounting postings, a prepayment clearing account has been added to SAP ERP Central Component.
u2022 Upon prepayment, the software debits this account and then settles the account again after executing the check.
Purchasing accounting information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse
u2022 With the transfer of the purchasing account information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse component (whose functionality is now part of SAP Net Weaver), it is now possible to maintain Info Cubes, reports, and queries that can determine how and where the costs from purchasing documents have been assigned and controlled.
u2022 As part of the software, a new data source (2LIS_02_ACC) has been created and the purchasing extraction process extended to cover the account information for purchasing orders, schedule agreements, and contracts.
Automatic settlement of planned delivery costs with evaluated receipt settlement (MRDC)
u2022 A new report (RMMR1MDC), available within the logistics invoice verification, can be used to automatically settle planned delivery costs.
u2022 To invoke the report, from the SAP easy access screen, choose the menu path "Logistics -> Materials Management -> Logistics Invoice Verification -> Automatic Settlement -> Automatic Delivery Cost Settlement" (transaction code MRDC).
u2022 Functionality for report RMMR1MRS is enhanced.
u2022 User can use the report RMMR1MRS, "Evaluated receipt settlement with logistics invoice verification (LIV)" (transaction code MRRL), to settle planned delivery costs in addition to goods and service items within logistics invoice verification.
u2022 To do so, set the relevant indicator on the initial screen of the report.
Parking service items
It is now possible to put service orders without errors or with commitment errors on hold.
Report MB5B : Stock on Posting Date
u2022 This Report is available with u201CNon-Hierarchyu201D display option which provides details of Opening, Receipt, Issue and Closing balances of Stock with quantity and value both for a given period.
u2022 This functionality is not available in Release 4.7.
Stock Transfer Between Storage Locations
u2022 Function of stock transport orders between storage locations is available from ECC 6.0 onwards.
u2022 As a result of which user can input issuing storage location with supplying plant.
u2022 Facility of using different delivery types for different issuing storage locations is available.
u2022 Shipping Point data can also be determined based on the issuing storage location

Similar Messages

  • Comparision between Modules and SWF files

    I've used modules and SWF files in my flex apps but don't
    seem to see or figure out what the basic difference between the two
    is.
    I'm interested in comparisions *excluding* file size. For
    instance:
    When would one use SWF files instead of Modules?
    Are there things possible/not possible when using one or the
    other?
    Any other pros/cons?

    Obviously you can use Application SWFs to break a large
    application into dynamically loaded parts. Modules were created to
    address the ease-of-use issue. Module SWFs provide an easier
    mechanism for communication between the Modules and main (shell)
    application SWF. Modules also give us a way to enhance that
    mechanism in the future which would be limiting if working solely
    with Applications.
    Further, Modules can be reduced in SWF-size compiling them
    against the symbols loaded in the shell application. This makes
    them much smaller and faster to download. That was possible with
    Application SWFs by using Runtime Shared Libraries. However, using
    RSLs is tedious compared to using Modules.
    I have an example of using Modules on my blog. The example
    covers the size optimization of Modules as well as communication
    with Modules.

  • Performance comparision between java and c++ in games (openGL)

    Hi everyone,
    I was working on java 3D and JOGL as part of my graphics openGL homework. Most of my classmates stuck to GLUT in c,c++ for programming stating that java is slow. I did attend a few seminars on java, java swing etc, they stated that java is faster now. I was wondering if there is a tool of some sort to compare performance, frame rate , time to compile etc. The closest I could find was a java memory leak finding tool used to detect memory leaks in java programs.
    Thanks,
    A

    compilation time is irrelevant in measuring program performance.
    There have been numerous "benchmarks" comparing C++ with other languages (including Java), usually by people who have an agenda and need data to "prove" their position to the world.
    The best you can do is get experts in each language and toolkit to write programs that do the same and are optimised to the same degree, then run those programs side by side on identical hardware for a period of time and see for yourself.
    Remember of course that JVM startup time is longer than startup time for native compiled C++ applications, so you need to run the program for a good period to get reliable figures (hours to be entirely sure).
    Do that for each part of the toolkit you're interested in using separately and make your own decisions based on the results.
    I know this is time consuming and hard to set up, which is precisely why it's probably not been done reliably (people who care to prove that something is faster than something else don't bother to be impartial, those that don't care don't bother to go to the trouble to do something they don't care about).

  • Difference between ecc6 and 4.7c abap coding

    Hi,
    Now iam working on sap-abap  IN 4.6B version.
    any changes if i work on ecc6 .

    Hi Venkat Reddy,
    There will be no change. We ll have lot of standard fn modules for freequently used developments like upload download etc..
    It will be colorful if u set in new in utilities. Nothing will differ.
    Regards,
    Subbu

  • SRRELROLES TABLE COMPARISION BETWEEN SRM AND ECC

    Hi all
    i would like to compare both tables SRRELROLES  in ecc and srm for any one of SRM Business objects and linked ECC Business Objects for ALL the records not one records.
    how .any clue is appreciated.
    i followed peter methid but not works for me
    the relations are stored in the tables SRRELROLES (this consist the documents) and BBP_PDBINREL (this consists the links):
    In the table SRRELROLES are all of the the documents listed (SC, PO, BID...). Each line of the SRRELROLES consist a ROLEID. If you call the table BBP_PDBINREL with this roleid, as a result you will get the link (ROLEID_A or ROLEID_B) to the related documents.
    Whit this ROLEID just call the table SRRELROLES and you will get the related document.
    I tried in development box . it did not work. let me try other environment
    Regards,
    Peter
    muthu

    Sanjeev,
    Thanks for the reply. But still there is description difference in SRM - frontend and backend system.
    The SRM backend is correct but when we log ninto the SRM portal (frontend), the company code description are missing some characters. Can you pl let me know where is the frontend is picking the Company code description in SRM?
    Jit

  • Comparision btw Struts and JSTL tags

    Hi,
    Is there any article or helpful information that any body have come across that have good comparision between struts and JSTL tags? I am trying to find similar JSTL tags to my struts application.
    Any help in this regard is appreciated.
    Thanks,
    -jon

    You can't use JSTL to replace struts completely. The struts tags and the JSTL tags have some overlap in the logic, control flow and formatting bits, but there is a lot that struts does that JSTL doesn't (the input controls).
    Struts-el was a bridge between Struts and JSTL for JSP1.2 containers.
    It has a very limited use nowadays. Most applications should be being written in J2EE1.4 (Servlet 2.4/JSP2.0), and thus the requirement for the struts-el tags is not there - the container understands EL without special tags required.
    As I said before you should only use Struts-EL if
    - You are stuck with a J2EE1.3 (Servlet2.3/JSP1.2) container
    - You want to use EL with struts.
    For myself, I prefer using the EL expression like ${expr} rather than older <%= expr %>, but it comes down to personal preference.
    Cheers,
    evnafets

  • Difference between ECC5 and ECC6

    Hi ,
    Can any one let me know the difrence between ECC5 and ECC6, and is there any extra configuration in post-installation steps.
    regards!!
    Syed

    Hello,
    There is a post installation document available for both the releases.
    you can find ecc5 post installation document at following link http://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000591511&_SCENARIO=01100035870000000202&_OBJECT=011000358700000093422005E
    cheers,
    -Sunil

  • Difference between ECC6.0SR2 and SR3

    Hi experts,
    Could you please tell me what's the difference between ECC6.0SR2 and SR3?
    Is the difference just Support Package level after installation?
    And how can I check whether my ECC6.0 is SR2 or SR3?
    I checked component version in system status from system memu in SAPGUI.
    The component version is "SAP ECC 6.0". I could not get the SR level by
    t-cd slicense and SM51.
    Thanks,
    Tsumas

    Is the difference just Support Package level after installation?
    Yes
    And how can I check whether my ECC6.0 is SR2 or SR3?
    Check SP level.
    I checked component version in system status from system memu in SAPGUI.
    The component version is "SAP ECC 6.0".
    Go a step further: Click at the magnifying glass; you will see SP level of SAP_BASIS and others.

  • Difference between ecc6.0 and 4.7

    hello gurus
    what are the major difference between ecc6.0 and 4.7

    Hi,
    The ECC6 comes with the inbuilt functionality of New GL which helps in Parallel Accounting, Multiple Reporting Requiremnets, Real time CO to FI Integration, Online document splitting, Integration of management dimensions in the GL etc.
    All these functionality there by helps in fast Period end close or Month end close activities as there is no need to run JOBS or Programmes in moth or period end because of Real time integration.
    Also the Reduction in TCO from Companies point of view.
    These functionalities doesnt come in 4.7 either you intall New GL in 4.7 or upgrade to ECC6.0
    For more details go to help.sap.com.
    Regards
    Shireesh

  • Any defference  display icon between ecc and ecc6

    Hi,
    any defference  between ecc and ecc6  to display ICON
    my problem is i was run the one program in ecc  then output shows with icons.
    same program run in ecc6  output is same but ther is no icons like ecc
    Regards
    naresh

    Hi
    Good
    Yes you could find some new icons in between ECC and ECC 6.0 but I dont think there is lots of difference between these two, though you have not mentioned the program name it is hard to give you the correct reply on that, but yes in some standard program cases you may find this kind of problems.
    Thanks
    mrutyun^

  • Comparision Document between PI and Informatica.

    Hi All,
            I have requirement where the current Informatica system is being replaced by PI. I would like to present .PPT to my client showing the comparison of operations between PI and Informatica. I would like to show pros and cons of both PI and Informatica. Request to provide me any useful document mentioning so.

    Hi,
    Please check below link.
    SAP PI 7.1 in what way it can replace an ETL tool like Informatica?
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10fbac70-c381-2d10-afbe-c3902a694eaf?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
    In addition you can refer below link as well
    Re: SAP PI 7.1 or 7.3 vs webMethods,Oracle Fusion,Biz talk, Tibco,IBM websphere
    Regards,
    Deepak.

  • Link between GTM and FSCM (sales or purchase order hedging)

    Hi all,
    I am trying for a few days to have SAP GTM working (I am in an IDES ECC6 system, and as far as I know in EhP4 version). The main goal in fact is to test the currency hedging, and therefore to the link GTM and FSCM, either single-sided purchase or sales order, or two-sided . The flow I want is the following :
    -     I buy or sell a product, in GTM, through a trading contract which generates a purchase or sales order.
    -     Automatically a currency hedge is generated to cover the risk, in FSCM, I guess in exposure management.
    -     And then the financial products (derivatives) are generated as well.
    No problem to create the trading contract, no problem to generate the sales or purchase order. But in spite of the (very little) customizing I found in u201CSAP GTM => currency hedgesu201D, and some in FSCM, in u201Ctreasury and risk managementu201D, no way to have this link between GTM and FSCM, no additional document is generated like a Forward Exchange Transaction (I guess I should have this, and then a risk exposure in FSCM).
    Would you have an idea ? Is this customizing, or an additional Business Functions or Extension Set not activated ? SAP says : u201Cit worksu201D, but canu2019t find the way.
    Thank you very much for your help, I am quite looking for this link for a few days now u2026
    Best regards
    Patrick

    Yes Mr Ashish!
    As far as iam concern there is no link between Project & Customer Master, you have to link it with SALES order, I had check in XD03,XD01, the complete customer master, i didnt find any field in customer master which links with Project.
    I'll let you know if i find any links.
    Regards,
    ANSAR

  • Differences between standard and pro versions

    I was reading the comparision of these two Acrobat versions and for Pro it says:
    Edit and enhance photos to add to your PDF communications with Adobe Photoshop® CS5.
    Quickly transform static PowerPoint slides into compelling, interactive PDF presentations with Adobe Presenter       
    Rapidly combine screen recordings, narration, video, slides, and more into a rich media experience with Adobe Captivate® 5
    Does that mean that the Pro version includes Photoshop, Presenter and Captivate programs as well? Or, what are the differences? As an aside, the new look and feel of the Adobe website is confusing at best. Seems geared to being flashy, not useful.
    Regards, David

    Acrobat does not included those other packages. One of the pages that always struck me funny (maybe I have a twisted mind) but has this artistic background is the updates page. The background looks like a lacy bra to me. It is the first thing that comes to mind every time I see it. That is a problem with abstract images (that are typically unnecessary and waste bandwidth), that a lot is in the eye of the beholder. Actually, I have heard from many others that also see the bra.
    OK, back to Acrobat. There are several aspects of Acrobat that allow you to have links to the other products built in, but they are not included. The page at http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobatpro/buying-guide.html?promoid=JIJYS provides some info, but a lot is missing. For instance there are differences with PDF Optimize and Reduce File Size I think (sorry, I do not have Std to check). One important one that is part of pro is the preflight option. Apparently Std does not include portfolios or allow PDF comparison according to the chart.
    If you are into forms, then Std apparently will do them as AcroForms (my preference, partially because of familiarity), but does not include Designer if that was your preference. Some of the enabling for Reader is not available in Std. Also, Std does not allow embedding Flash. Std is limited for some of the products that include PDF Maker (not a big one for me, but might be important to you).
    That is a quick summary based on the chart. However, be aware there are some other features that the chart does not seem to cover. For the difference between Std and Pro, I would suggest getting Pro. The big hit is the initial cost of the product, not the step up to Pro. In a business plan consider the time that might be wasted trying to do some of the things in Pro that are not in Std. Those are the types of issues to consider. Many folks consider the cost to be large, and for a small business it is. However, in the long term it may be worth the cost.
    Keep in mind that many large CAD packages in engineering run about $30,000 for a single license, half the cost of the engineer that would use it. Some other tools are about $15,000. In that view, Acrobat is cheap (except for cheapskates like me).

  • Link between SWWIHEAD and SWW_WI2OBJ

    Previously I used to link SWWIHEAD and sww_contob.
    Now in ECC 6.0 that is not working. I am thinking now data is getting updated in SWW_WI2OBJ. Correct me if I am wrong...
      CLEAR: gt_swwwihead,
             gt_swwwihead[].
      SELECT wi_id
             wi_text
             wi_stat
             wi_cd
             wi_ct
             wi_aed
             wi_cruser
             wi_rh_task
      FROM swwwihead INTO TABLE gt_swwwihead
      WHERE wi_stat    IN s_wfstat AND
            wi_cd      IN s_wicd   AND
            wi_cd      IN gr_date  AND
            wi_rh_task IN gr_task.
      IF NOT gt_swwwihead[] IS INITIAL.
        CLEAR: gt_swwcontob,
               gt_swwcontob[].
        SELECT wi_id
               element
               tab_index
               objtype
               objkey
              FROM sww_contob
              INTO TABLE gt_swwcontob
            FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_swwwihead
            WHERE wi_id   = gt_swwwihead-wi_id AND
                  objtype IN s_objtyp AND
                  objkey  IN s_objkey.
        IF   gt_swwcontob[] IS INITIAL.
          REFRESH gt_swwwihead.
          EXIT.
        ENDIF.
    Please suggest me on this.
    Thanks
    Sree

    Hi,
    But which fields have different types? If you mean switch dokument number in table SWW_CONT and switchdocument number in table eideswtdoc then it's rather obvious that types are different because SWW_CONT must have possibility to contain values for many different container elements. Never less you should make comparision between those fields.
    If you meant something else then please tell it.
    Best regards
    Marcin Cholewczuk

  • ALE configuration Between HR and FI system

    Dear All,
    We have HR system on ECC6 and FI system on 4.x version,
    i have to do ALE configuration between these two systems , please guide me what bapi's , idocs and what background jobs i need to run on FI system or HR system
    please advise at the earliest.
    Regards,
    Najeeb ..

    http://searchsap.techtarget.com/general/0,295582,sid21_gci1130337,00.html
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/CABFAIS/CABFAIS.pdf

Maybe you are looking for