Comparison between entered value and stored value

An user enters his or her code, the code needs to match the code which corresponds to her code in the file, else the value is set to zero and asks to be re-entered, if correct to proceed.
Attachments:
hell.vi ‏63 KB

And what is the problem?
Using the constant seems to be working as you describe, is it when you read a file there is a problem? If so could you supply one such file?
MTO

Similar Messages

Comparison between Oracle Contracts and Oracle Procurement Contracts?

Hi All,
I need some document which give the Comparison between Oracle Contracts and Oracle Procurement Contracts?
And which of them are suitable for what type of contracts?
Thanks
Syed

Hi,
Any kind of help plz.
Regards,
Subhra

Comparison Between Oracle eBS and JD Edwards

Hi All,
Is there any site / document / any kind of referference / help on comparison between Oracle-eBS and JD Edwards mainly for Finance and SCM module please ? Need this urgently so any help is appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Subhra Saha

Hi,
Any kind of help plz.
Regards,
Subhra

Questions on the comparison between Oracle Forms and Oracle APEX

Hi All,
The link below presents information about Oracle Application Express for Oracle Forms Developers, the table at the end of the page shows a comparison between Oracle Forms and Oracle APEX, all the points of comparisons are clear for me except 3 points which are:
•Locking, what is meant by locking models?
•Database Connections, what is meant by Synchronous/Asynchronous connections in Oracle Forms and Oracle Apex?
•Architecture, what is meant by 2tier and 3 tier connections?
http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/application_express/html/apex_for_forms.html
What I need is a simple explanation for these points without deep details.
Thanks

Hi
That is how I understand that document:
Locking: Forms, by default, locks a row as soon as the user starts modifying the data. That is pessimistic locking. Apex, on other hand (and optionally forms also) do not lock the record, but before applying any changes checks if the data has changed since the user queried it (what for some reason is called optimistic "locking")
DB connections: I am not sure why they used the terms synchronous/asynchronous, but the difference is that Forms, by default, keeps an permanent DB connection while the user is using the application, while Apex gets a connection from a connection pool every time a page is requested/submitted.
Architecture: Forms (in its web version at least) has 3 tiers: the browser, the appserver where the forms service runs and the database. As Apex runs inside the database, there are only 2 tiers: the browser and the database (though you still may need an http server in between which serves static content, I don't think it is considered part of the application in this context). If you are talking about client/server forms, then there are only 2 tiers.
I hope this helps!
Luis

Performance end to end testing and comparison between MPLS VPN and VPLS VPN

Hi,
I am student of MSc Network Security and as for my project which is " Comparison between MPLS L3 VPN and VPLS VPN, performance monitoring by end to end testing " I have heard a lot of buzz about VPLS as becoming NGN, I wanted to exppore that and produce a comparison report of which technology is better. To accomplish this I am using GNS3, with respect to the MPLS L3 VPN lab setup that is not a problem but I am stuck at the VPLS part how to setup that ? I have searched but unable to find any cost effective mean, even it is not possible in the university lab as we dont have 7600 series
I would appreciate any support, guidence, advice.
Thanks
Shahbaz

Hi Shahbaz,
I am not completely sure I understand your request.
MPLS VPN and VPLS are 2 technologies meant to address to different needs, L3 VPN as opposed as L2 VPN. Not completely sure how you would compare them in terms of performance. Would you compare the performance of a F1 racing car with a Rally racing car?
From the ISP point of view there is little difference (if we don't want to consider the specific inherent peculiarities of each technology) , as in the very basic scenarios we can boil down to the following basic operations for both:
Ingress PE impose 2 labels (at least)
Core Ps swap top most MPLS label
Egress PE removes last label exposing underlying packet or frame.
So whether the LSRs deal with underlying L2 frames or L3 IP packets there is no real difference in terms of performance (actually the P routers don't even notice any difference).
About simulators, I am not aware of anyone able to simulate a L2 VPN (AtoM or VPLS).
Riccardo

Heat comparison between a macbook and a dell

Hi all,
Found this on digg. Interesting comparison of core duo heat issues between a macbook and a dell.
http://iith096.blogspot.com/2006/07/macbook-vs-dell-heated-battle.html

.

Hyperion Version Comparison Between 9.x and 11.x

Hello Experts,
Is it possible for you to provide me any guide(doc) or link that contains comparison between Hyperion 9.x products and Hyperion 11.x (latest) products? Or advise suitable team to contact about this.
Your help in this matter is most appreciated.
Many thanks in Advance,
Anil

Hi, Tomi,
I believe it will be better if you post this question in the LabVIEW Discussion Forum. People there might give you a better opinion.
GValdes

Looking for Performance Comparisons Between JRockit 6 and Sun Java SE 6

Hello,
Can someone point me to some performance comparisons (benchmarks, etc.) between the JRockit and Sun JVMs?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Ben.
Before I send to to the SPEC sites (which can be a tad hard to parse) I must ask - What application or type of application are you interested in? The answer will vary a bit depending on what you need.

Comparison between Oracle BI and Cognos

hi All,
Can anyone tell me about the differences between Oracle BI and Cognos BI(8i)?
Actually at the present time i m working on Oracle BI and later(after few days) i need to work on Cognos BI (8i).
so if anyone has any stuff or link related to the same then please help me out
thanks

Hi
I am working on Hyperion. Really need to comapre Hyperion Vs Cognos
Can you tell me where to get Cognos8.3 installation set up.
Thanks

Comparison between Articulate Storyline and Presenter features as timeline and scripting

Hello everybody,
we came to a critical point now, having to choose the best tool to develop e-learning courses together with a big company, that since now had developed hundred of e-learning courses on a flash-platform based platform.
This company uses to develop first storyboard in Powerpoint, then a further step is required to inserting audio track to be synchronize with text and graphics, and to add second-level integration such as popup, callouts, buttons etc.
Flash has been abandoned because of low-ipad compatibilty as we know, so we have made a first experiment with Articulate Storyline, and i must say it has lot of great features. We also tried to explore Presenter features, and i think it would be even a best solution, but there are important features missing in my opinion:
a timeline management, to easily syncronize elements, expecially with audio, and to allow a better layer management.
a minimum scripting (triggers) usage such as pause/stop, show/hide layers, buttons management etc.
management of several kind of questioning and scoring and storing of relative informations to display a result
there are also other lacks, but these are the most important to me. I ask here if for some reason these feature are present and maybe i was not capable to find them out, and if in any case Adobe is managing to upgrade the esisting version of Presenter to allow these features.
I realize that Presenter is anyway a Powerpoint plugin, so the main engine to refer is Powerpoint itself, but we need to take a choice for the best tool actually available for this work (that i can say is the most frequent activity for e-learning purpose), and at the moment i must say that Storyline is the most appropriate tool.
Please let me have some opinions and considerations,
thanks
Daniele

Daniele, in my opinion you compare two tools that have a different goal. You should compare Captivate, or even better the elearning Suite with Storyline (about same price eLS with SL), not Presenter alone. Presenter can be compared with Articulate Presenter, not with Storyline that has a different goal. Captivate has the features you are asking for, like scripting (check my blog on Advanced actions: http://lilybiri.posterous.com/), timeline, shape buttons... And in the eLearning Suite 6 you get Presenter 8 as well, but also Audition (best audio editing tool) and Photoshop with great roundtripping to Captivate. Other including applications like Flash, Acrobat, Dreamweaver... are certainly worthwhile as well. It is just an idea,
Lilybiri

How to resolve Comparison between a value with static type string and a possible unrelated type numb

I am new to this and any help would be greatly appreciated, Im trying to display custom numbers for values of a Hslider.
Here is my code so far:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<s:Application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
                                 xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
                                 xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" minWidth="955" minHeight="600">
<fx:Declarations>

</fx:Declarations>
<fx:Script>
                    <![CDATA[
                              import mx.events.SliderEvent;
                              protected function ValueSlider_changeHandler(event:SliderEvent):void
                              ValueLabel.text = String(ValueSlider.value);
                                        if(ValueSlider.value == "0")
                                        ValueLabel.text = "150";
                                        if(ValueSlider.value == "1")
                                        ValueLabel.text = "333";
                                        if(ValueSlider.value == "2")
                                        ValueLabel.text = "543";
                                        if(ValueSlider.value == "3")
                                        ValueLabel.text = "9342";
                    ]]>
</fx:Script>
          <s:Panel x="199" y="141" width="250" height="200">
                    <s:HSlider id="ValueSlider" x="74" y="68" maximum="5" minimum="0" stepSize="1"/>
                    <s:Label id="ValueLabel" x="109" y="38" text="Label"/>
</s:Panel>
</s:Application>

Thank you for your help, I was using quotes around the number from a suggestion on another forum. Now how to I display the result on valueLabel? "valueLabel.text"? {valueLable.text}, "const"?,
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<s:Application xmlns:fx="http://ns.adobe.com/mxml/2009"
                                 xmlns:s="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/spark"
                                 xmlns:mx="library://ns.adobe.com/flex/mx" minWidth="955" minHeight="600">
<fx:Declarations>

</fx:Declarations>
<fx:Script>
                    <![CDATA[
                              import mx.events.SliderEvent;
                              protected function ValueSlider_changeHandler(event:SliderEvent):void
                                        const CONVERSION:Array = ["150","333","543","9342"];
                                        valueLabel.text = CONVERSION[valueSlider.value];
                    ]]>
</fx:Script>
          <s:Panel x="199" y="141" width="250" height="200">
                    <s:HSlider id="valueSlider" x="78" y="69" maximum="3" minimum="0" stepSize="1" value="1"/>
<s:Label id="valueLabel" x="109" y="38" text= "(valueLabel.text)"/> <-----what do I place here?
</s:Panel>
</s:Application>

Cost center wise comparison between FI view and CO view

Hi,
I have one doubt regarding comparison of cost center in FBL3N and in in S_ALR_87013611.
Is there any report in from which I can compare Cost center wise actual spending in FBL3N versus some reports in CO?
I would appreciate if someone help me on this.
Thanks in advance!
Bhargav
Edited by: BHARGAV RASBIHARI PADHYA on Nov 17, 2010 6:10 AM

Hi Bhargav,
If I am not wrong you are taking about the comparison of cost centres values in Co to Cost centre Values in FI.
If this is the case, then its a pain compiling the values. Because, when values flow from FI to CO then dont come to one cost centre, they are spread accross various cost centres where they are incurred.
For Example : You may debit P&S GL account for 10000, but the cost centres involve this expenditure this can be from different cost cetres like from Finance, Marketing, Retail etc.
Now if you want to compare the cost ccentre values with the FI and COthen you can imagine the work and time involved in it.
Let me know if anyone have any different views on this.
Regards,
Mallikarjun

Performance comparison between oops reports and normaal reports

Hi Abapers,
Can anyone tell me that how is it better to use oops reports instesad of normal reports
as there is no difference in select query in both the reports, and if you have any reports which give the same output developed in oops and normal way....
pls provide me with that.... so that i can check....
Regards
Aarif

Hi Arif,
the performance tuning doesn't mean concern of data fetch load or reducing database access. It also means reduce ABAP load i.e. load of Application Server.
OOABAP report works directly with memory. not with work area or tempory variable top store a value. So if your program is reached with READ, LOOP...ENDLOOP etc. you can reduce its load by using OOABAP concept.
Getting this think, you can develope an application of your own.
Regards,
Anirban

Memory Management comparison between Database 9208 and 11gR2 on Sun Solaris

Hi All,
Need some case studies which would help understand how Memory management is done in 9208 and 11gR2 on Sun Solaris SPARC
Also wanted some real time data which says 11gR2 manages Memory and CPU better than 9208. Some comparison Graph between 9i and 11gR2.
Any information will be of great help.
Thanks everyone for your support.
Thanks
Abdul

please see if below helps :
http://www.oracle.com/global/de/upgradecommunity/artikel/upgrade11gr1_workshop2.pdf
http://www.dba-oracle.com/oracle11g/oracle_11g_memory_target_parameter.htm
Regards
Rajesh

What is the speed/performance comparison between Soundbooth CS5 and Audition CS6?

Obviously, I don't need to be convinced about the difference. However, in demonstrating and working with Audition I didn't take a note of these speed differences. Does anyone have this information for business justification reasons?
I am looking for the speed of a sound file (*.wav, approximately 1-5minutes in length) rendering in Soundbooth CS5 and Audition CS6 as well as a comparison of doing 10 files (approximately 1-5 minutes in length each) in Soundbooth and in Audition CS6 (using batch processing) to *.mp3 with basic processes applied. Basic processes that I am checking are Noise Reduction, Trimming front and end silences, Normalization, and rendering to *.mp3 (from *.wav). If anyone can do this for me, that would be awesome!!

travis_smith_ wrote:
Hello _durin_, yes all those are great arguments that I've already included; however, some people like to use accurate measures/times/processes...they want numbers.
So, do you (or anyone else) happen to know the render engine speed of 1 file in Soundbooth v. 1 file in Audition?
What Durin hasn't perhaps made quite clear is that you'd have to do this on just one machine to come up with any comparisons at all - and if that machine isn't identical to yours, then it's going to be meaningless anyway; some of the processes (like NR) will vary considerably between two different machines, even running the same software. There is no way on earth that this would be an accurate comparison, and I don't think it would convince anybody who actually understood what was at issue. This is the politest way of saying that it's not going to happen... and if Durin, as Audition's Product Owner, isn't prepared to commit himself, then nobody's going to.... BUT:
Now I am moving towards the argumentation that it should replace everyone's Soundbooth, which is why I need the justification. I would run the tests myself over the current set of files, but with the license gone, I cannot.
Your real justification isn't going to be based on anything like dodgy process measurements at all, but this: Soundbooth is discontinued - there's very little, if any, support for it now, and there will be no updates to cope with OS changes, etc. Audition, on the other hand, is a long-term, well-supported software product that's under active development, and this is clearly intended to continue. Also there are business package deals to be done (like active subscriptions, etc) that simply weren't available to Soundbooth users, which companies can use far more flexibly. I think you'll find that arguements like this will cut far more mustard than any odious comparisons of 'speed' will.

Comparison between entered value and stored value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for