Comparison between split Adapter in Seeburger and EDI Separator

Hello All,
Currently we are designing EDI interfaces using B2B Add-On.
I am trying to compare the split Adapter of Seeburger and EDI Separator of B2B Add-on.
In Seeburger Splitter configuration:
The additional split configuration helps to map the Sender ID, (EDIType,Transaction,Version) combination to split channel and sender agreement.
I believe a List of Sender Id, Mappings (Standard, Transaction, Version) combinations can be added to the same Split channel and Sender Agreements.
In B2B Add-On:
The sender ids , EDI details are directly mentioned in the channel and it is bound to sender agreement.
Does it reduce the flexibility in EDI Scenarios.Is that a correct point of view?
Your inputs highly appreciated.
Thanks.
Regards,
Sudharshan N A

Dear Sudharshan,
yes, I would say that this is a correct point/observation. When the Seeburger Adapters were introduced many years ago, one focus was put on the flexibility by keeping all functionality related to the "format conversion" (Classifier/Bic/Splitter) completely separated from the "data transmission" functionality directly in the channel.
This way, the format conversion modules could be included in any adapter that was running on the AdapterEngine and not just to the See-Adapters.
In a typical setup on client side, almost all inbound channels were using the "AUTO" functionality to detect all required parameters to select the right Split-Channel...so all channels had the same module-chains included (no matter if it was an AS2-Channel or a simple FILE/FTP-channel.
This also allowed for easy reprocessing of any received file (via AS2, X400 , OFTP or else....) by just putting the file again to a file-channel with the same module-chain parameters.
Kind Regards
Stefan
Btw... I am not very familiar with the B2B AddOn, but if you have additional questions regarding the Seeburger-EDI-Adapters, feel free to ask...

Similar Messages

  • Looking for comparison between MS Visual Source Safe and Oracle SCM

    Hi,
    I am looking for some comparison between MS Visual Source Safe and Oracle SCM.
    What I need is technical feature comparison (not just marketing comparison stating that Oracle SCM is better for everything is stored in the very reliable Oracle database(although this is a good point)).
    Any help in this area will be helpfull.
    Best regards,
    Mihail Daskalov

    Thanks you for your answer,
    I like very much Oracle SCM, which I use extensively.
    I have very little experience with MS VSS (only on my local machine). I have never tested it in a network environment with multiple developers.
    I would like to convince other developers to switch to Oracle SCM, but I need to know what to tell them.
    I'm actually both a developer and DBA, and I do like the safety the Oracle Database offers for storing files inside.
    I like very much the opportunity to connect with Oracle Repository Navigator from a remote location to my database through Connection Manager and to be able to work with my projects. (There is an issue with this configuration due to the JDBC driver used I'm unable to compare files).
    But to convince people I need to know more about the differences between MS VSS and Oracle SCM.
    I would appreciate if any of the developers share experience with VSS and SCM.
    Regards,
    Mihail Daskalov

  • Dieffrence between ALE (Application Link Enabling ) and EDI

    Dear Experts
    can you pls. explain me the dieffrence between ALE (Application Link Enabling ) and EDI (electronic data interchange)
    especially regarding transfer (transmission).
    Regards
    Marco
    Moderator message: please search for available information/documentation.
    Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Jan 25, 2012

    Dear Experts
    can you pls. explain me the dieffrence between ALE (Application Link Enabling ) and EDI (electronic data interchange)
    especially regarding transfer (transmission).
    Regards
    Marco
    Moderator message: please search for available information/documentation.
    Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Jan 25, 2012

  • Performance comparisons between Apple's SSD's and hard drives

    Am looking for objective performance data comparing SSD's in Apple's MacBook Pro versus Apple's hard drives in MacBook Pro. I've read some material in Tom's Hardware but am looking for specific device comparisons of these storage types in MacBooks. Seek/latency/read transfer rates/write transfer rates/reliability/etc.

    Thanks for the information!! I've book-marked the site and plan to refer to it often.

  • [AS-CS5] Comparison between text style range and character style

    Hi,
    It's been a while since I'm not coming on this forum ...
    I'm looking to make a comparison between a "text style range" and a character style.
    I have no problems, except for the comparison of "fonts".
    myCurrentText = text for char…
    theStyle = character style id…
    I try:
           if (applied font of myCurrentText ≠ applied font of theStyle) then set theCharDifference to 1 
    The selected text give me:
           font "Minion Pro        Italic" of application "Adobe InDesign CS5.5"
    and the character style:
           "Minion Pro"
    I try "set theTextFont to font of applied font of myCurrentText" -> Error
    This is my script (it's too long to post here) <http://db.tt/BLoGPiN>.
    Loot at the "on CheckCharacterDifference(myCurrentText, theStyle)"
    TIA.
    Oli.

    I've written this, but I do not know if it covers all cases ...
    Someone?
    Thanks.
    Oli.
    set theText to item 1 of selection
    set theStyleChar to properties of character style 2
    -- analysis of the properties of the text
    set myTextFontApplied to applied font of theText
    set myTextFontFamily to font family of applied font of theText
    set myTextFontStyle to font style of theText
    -- analysis of the character style
    set myStyleCharFontStyle to applied font of theStyleChar
    if myStyleCharFontStyle = "" then
         set myStyleCharFontStyle to font style of theStyleChar
         if myStyleCharFontStyle ≠ myTextFontStyle then set theDifference to true
    else
         if myStyleCharFontStyle ≠ myTextFontFamily then set theDifference to true
    end if
    Message was edited by: OlivierBerquin

  • Hyperion Version Comparison Between 9.x and 11.x

    Hello Experts,
    Is it possible for you to provide me any guide(doc) or link that contains comparison between Hyperion 9.x products and Hyperion 11.x (latest) products? Or advise suitable team to contact about this.
    Your help in this matter is most appreciated.
    Many thanks in Advance,
    Anil

    Hi, Tomi,
    I believe it will be better if you post this question in the LabVIEW Discussion Forum. People there might give you a better opinion.
    GValdes

  • Query on EDI Separator adapter

    Hi,
    We are using B2B Add-On and EDI Separator adapter.
    There is a EDIFACT interface handling a particular transaction and version - Orders D96A. For a bunch of the partners (sender/receiver id combinations) we need to invoke a particular mapping and rest of the partners to use a different mapping.
    How can this be accomplished?
    Regards
    Rizwana

    Hi Piyush,
    I have created one  EDI separator channel as Sender Id as *,and one more EDI separator channel with specific Partner sender ID eg "123456".
    When an EDI file for specific partner 123456 arrives it invokes both the default and specific channels and flow.
    Is this a bug or expected behavior of the EDI Separator sender channel.
    Regards
    Rizwana.

  • SEEBURGER AS2 and EDI adapters, PGP Avalanche adapter

    Hi,
    Kindly anybody can provide the information/links/documentation/PDFs on SEEBURGER AS2 and EDI adapters, PGP Avalanche adapter.
    Thanks in advance,
    Jogula Ramesh

    When u install SeeburgerBIC mapper on ur machine, the below location will contain all the required manuals..
    C:\Program Files\Seeburger\CPG EDI Adapter\manuals
    You can seach SDN weblogs for Seeburger Adapter details if u don't have the software..
    Below is the starting Seeburger Adapter Series weblogs..
    /people/prateek.srivastava3/blog/2009/08/01/seeburger--part-1--the-basics
    -SM

  • Details on XI EDI adapter from seeburger

    Hi,
    We currently have our B2B integration going through Gentran & Webmethods.
    We are having a evaluation process on the different tools available.
    Can anyone give information on the licensing details of the XI EDI adapter from seeburger? Also do they have evaluation period? Has anyone gone through this process?
    We have written to seeburger on this, but i thought of posting on SDN as the responses would be faster
    Thanks & Regards,
    Renjith

    Hi Renjith,
    There is no downloadable trial version available.
    You need to contact your local or regional Seeburger sales office.
    Seeburger EDI Adapter provides an EDI solution on internet via HTTP or AS2 to replace the expensive VAN. It provides some pre-built mappings for IDOC to ANSI X12(810,850,855,856 etc.,) and Idoc to EDIFACT(ORDERS,DESADV,INVOIC etc.,) and has the ability to build your own. These pre-defined mappings transform the IDOC-XML to EDI-XML format.
    These transformed EDI-XML messages are then converted to EDI specific format using the Seeburger's BIC(Business Integration Converter)adapter. In addition, Seeburger provides adapters like AS2,FTP(EDI specific) and so on to route these EDI messages to external EDI Partners.
    Seeburger EDI Adapter leverages SAP XI's Adapter Framework. This Adapter is used to perform conversion between EDI and XML format. It also provides some canned EDI layouts and the ability to build your own. It is used to transfer the EDI message via HTTP or AS2 protocols.
    The most direct way of using the Seeburger adapters is to configure the BIC as a module. There is a software component from seeburger called bicmapper which will allow you to do the following:
    1. define or import the inbound message metadefinition in various formats ( edifact, xml,...)
    2. using a mapping create an xml variant as the output metadefinition or edifact in the other direction.
    3. create a one to one mapping between input en output.
    4. export the metadata in xsd or sda format for import in XI
    5. generate an SDA which can be deployed in XI and used as a module.
    Please go through the following links which clearly explains what you want and it also helps you in understanding the same in depth:
    http://www.seeburger.com
    http://www.seeburger.com/fileadmin/com/pdf/AS2_General_Overview.pdf
    http://www.seeburger.it/fileadmin/it/pdf/2005_04_sapphire_Ferrero_transcript.pdf
    http://www.seeburger.com/fileadmin/com/pdf/SEEBURGER_SAP_Adapter_engl.pdf
    http://www.seeburger.com/fileadmin/com/pdf/Butler_Group_SEEBURGER_Technology_Audit.pdf
    http://www.sap.com/france/company/events/2006/02-01-Automotive-Seeburger.pdf
    http://h41123.www4.hp.com/presentations/ISUG/XISeeBurger.ppt
    http://www.sap.com/asia/company/events/nwtechdays/presentation/australia-slides/Pre-Built_Integration.pdf
    Regards,
    Abhy
    Message was edited by: Abhy Thomas

  • Seeburger EDI adapter Vs Seeburger  BIC adapter

    hi,
    what is the difference between <b>Seeburger EDI adapter Vs Seeburger  BIC adapter</b>.any docs please.
    thank you,
    babu

    Hi,
    <i>Seeburger EDI adapter Vs Seeburger BIC adapter.</i>
    If your edi file converts with BIC mappers then you would have to use BIC adapter or BIC modules, i hope BIC modules, next EDI Adapters see the below links to get more details..
    /people/bla.suranyi/blog/2006/06/08/sap-xi-supports-edifact
    /people/william.li/blog/2006/03/17/how-to-get-started-using-conversion-agent-from-itemfield
    /people/paul.medaille/blog/2005/11/17/more-on-the-sap-conversion-agent-by-itemfield
    http://www.stylusstudio.com/edi/XML_to_X12.html
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b0b355ae-0501-0010-3b83-8f2bb566fa47
    Details on XI EDI adapter from seeburger
    Check this for Conversions-
    /people/bla.suranyi/blog/2006/06/08/sap-xi-supports-edifact
    http://www.seeburger.it/fileadmin/it/pdf/2005_04_sapphire_Ferrero_transcript.pdf
    http://www.seeburger.com/fileadmin/com/pdf/Butler_Group_SEEBURGER_Technology_Audit.pdf
    http://www.seeburger.com/fileadmin/com/pdf/AS2_General_Overview.pdf
    SAP Adapters
    EDI with XI
    http://www.seeburger.com
    http://www.seeburger.com/fileadmin/com/pdf/AS2_General_Overview.pdf
    http://www.seeburger.it/fileadmin/it/pdf/2005_04_sapphire_Ferrero_transcript.pdf
    http://www.seeburger.com/fileadmin/com/pdf/SEEBURGER_SAP_Adapter_engl.pdf
    http://www.seeburger.com/fileadmin/com/pdf/Butler_Group_SEEBURGER_Technology_Audit.pdf
    http://www.sap.com/france/company/events/2006/02-01-Automotive-Seeburger.pdf
    http://h41123.www4.hp.com/presentations/ISUG/XISeeBurger.ppt
    http://www.sap.com/asia/company/events/nwtechdays/presentation/australia-slides/Pre-Built_Integration.pdf
    http://www.seeburger.com
    http://www.seeburger.it/fileadmin/it/pdf/2005_04_sapphire_Ferrero_transcript.pdf
    http://www.seeburger.com/fileadmin/com/pdf/Butler_Group_SEEBURGER_Technology_Audit.pdf
    http://www.sap.com/france/company/events/2006/02-01-Automotive-Seeburger.pdf
    http://h41123.www4.hp.com/presentations/ISUG/XISeeBurger.ppt
    http://www.sap.com/asia/company/events/nwtechdays/presentation/australia-slides/Pre-Built_Integration.pdf
    Regards
    Chilla

  • Sap-xi-and-edi adapter

    Hi,
    I am interested to seek your expert advice on the scenario that we are trying. We are on XI 3 and have ftp connection. The sender is now talking about sending the EDI payment confirmation file with BANSTA format and for this we are going in for EDI adapter from Seeburger. I have the sample files which I can send across and I would greatly appreciate your advice on this. We do not have any EDI adapter experience in house and have a timeline of 3 weeks to complete it.
    Regards,
    Archana

    Hi,
    please have a look at this thread:
    XI with EDI
    Regards
    Patrick

  • Performance end to end testing and comparison between MPLS VPN and VPLS VPN

    Hi,
    I am student of MSc Network Security and as for my project which is " Comparison between MPLS L3 VPN and VPLS VPN, performance monitoring by end to end testing " I have heard a lot of buzz about VPLS as becoming NGN, I wanted to exppore that and produce a comparison report of which technology is better. To accomplish this I am using GNS3, with respect to the MPLS L3 VPN lab setup that is not a problem but I am stuck at the VPLS part how to setup that ? I have searched but unable to find any cost effective mean, even it is not possible in the university lab as we dont have 7600 series
    I would appreciate any support, guidence, advice.
    Thanks
    Shahbaz

    Hi Shahbaz,
    I am not completely sure I understand your request.
    MPLS VPN and VPLS are 2 technologies meant to address to different needs, L3 VPN as opposed as L2 VPN. Not completely sure how you would compare them in terms of performance. Would you compare the performance of a F1 racing car with a Rally racing car?
    From the ISP point of view there is little difference (if we don't want to consider the specific inherent peculiarities of each technology) , as in the very basic scenarios we can boil down to the following basic operations for both:
    Ingress PE impose 2 labels (at least)
    Core Ps swap top most MPLS label
    Egress PE removes last label exposing underlying packet or frame.
    So whether the LSRs deal with underlying L2 frames or L3 IP packets there is no real difference in terms of performance (actually the P routers don't even notice any difference).
    About simulators, I am not aware of anyone able to simulate a L2 VPN (AtoM or VPLS).
    Riccardo

  • The difference between SOAP adapter and WS adapter in PI 7.1

    Hello all,
    can anybody explain what is the main difference between SOAP adapter and WS adapter in PI 7.1?
    I have checked this [link|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/0d/5ab43b274a960de10000000a114084/frameset.htm]
    but was not able to find the real difference.
    Or better, what can I do with WS adapter I can't do with SOAP adapter? What are their advantages/disadvantages?
    Thank you all, Igor.

    In addition to RM, ws adapter also support other ws standard like SAML which is not available in SOAP adatper. Beside:
    if your sender or receiver is SAP system, you can also monitor the message in the sender/receiver in addition to the PI box. This is a very good thing, because sometime the MONI in PI shows nothing wrong, but the MONI in your receiver will show you error message that's only related to the receiver system.
    However, if you define ws sender CC, and your ws client doesn't support RM, you will have issue sending ws request.
    And ws CC will generate ws runtime in PI box, if your configuration is wrong (like user name and password not correct), even if you correct it, the ws runtime sometime won't be regenated based on the correction. In this case you need to delete the ws CC/agreement, and re-create it with all correct information.
    Beside make sure your basis team configured the PI system properly regarding ws. If not, you will have lot of pain to figure the problem which was my case.
    Jayson

  • Without using Seeburger Adapter can we convert EDI 864 TC to XML

    Hello Friends,
                            Can we convert 864 Transaction code (Text Message) to XML with out an External adapter like Seeburger Adapter? I mean can we write a code in JAVA for conversion? If so, what should i use in that Java code?

    Hi
    These blog can help u....
    /people/bla.suranyi/blog/2006/06/08/sap-xi-supports-edifact
    /people/srinivas.vanamala2/blog/2006/12/11/edi-basics
    Already discussed thread:
    EDI Conversion
    Re: Seeburger Splitter adapter!!
    Regards
    Santhosh
    Remember to set the thread to solved when you have received a solution

  • Comparison between cFP and cDAQ

    Hi,
    I'm looking for (as much details as possible) a comparisons between compact Fieldpoint and compact DAQ hardware.  I'm trying to decide which hardware platforms to use.
    TIA

    Compact Fieldpoint is for installed, industrial type applications.  It has a realtime operating system.  The controller runs code to read inputs and operate outputs.  The application can be distributed on an ethernet network.  There are different modules available for different types of inputs and ouputs.
    Compact DAQ also has numerous input and output modules.  It is more intended for portable applications.  It connects to your PC through a USB port.  So the code would need to run on the PC

Maybe you are looking for