Comparisons between WLI and SeeBeyond e*Gate Integrator?

Does anyone have any point of view about similarities and differences between
WLI and SeeBeyond e*Gate Integrator? I have some familiarity with e*Gate, and
I'm just starting to learn about WLI (although I'm pretty familiar with J2EE
and WebLogic Server).
It appears to me that WLI assumes that data collaborations between systems will
go from binary to XML, then perhaps to transformed XML, and then to binary.
I'm perfectly happy with using XML, but I wonder if it would be practical in
some cases to skip the XML representation and translate directly from one
binary representation to another. From what little I know of e*Gate, the most
straightforward transformations are just binary to binary, although XML
transformations are available.
===================================================================
David M. Karr ; Java/J2EE/XML/Unix/C++
[email protected] ; SCJP; SCWCD

Similar Messages

Comparison between Purisma and JCAPS?

I am researching several CDI (Customer Data Integration) solutions and I've narrowed this down to two solutions Purisma and JCAPS. I am mainly comparing the matching engines, record linkage efficiency and any machine learning capabilities.
Has anyone done a "head-to-head" comparison between JCAPS and Purisma?
Does anyone have any screenshots of the JCAPS record linkage tool for manual duplicate handling?
My blog: http://mycodeblog.blogspot.com

Why not write a test class? Shouldn't take long.

Comparison between Forms6i and Forms9i

We have some client/server-based applications built in Forms6i and are considering to convert/rebuild them into Forms9i or JDeveloper as web-based applications. Has anyone done any comparison between Forms6i and Forms9i/JDeveloper? Or, can you point me to such documentation if existed?
Thanks.

For comparison between forms 6i and Oracle9i Forms check out the new features paper on:
http://otn.oracle.com/products/forms
Comparison to JDeveloper? How about the fact that you develop with Java language in JDeveloper and with PL/SQL in Forms.
I would suggest that first you try to run your application on the Web using forms 6i. This should be a very simple test to do. See how you like it and only then ask yourself if you really need to go to JDeveloper.

Comparison between 3750 and 3750-metro

hi folks,
is there any links which will provide me on the comparison between 3750 and 3750-metro? for exapmple, isis is not support on 3750 but it support on 3750-metro. The product information from cisco site is insufficient in term of the main differences :p
rgd
josh.w

Hi Josh,
The Cisco Catalyst 3750 Metro Series is built for Metro Ethernet access in a customer location, enabling the delivery of more differentiated Metro Ethernet services. These switches feature bidirectional hierarchical QoS and Traffic Shaping, intelligent 802.1Q tunneling with class-of-service (CoS) mutation, VLAN translation, MPLS, EoMPLS, and Hierarchical Virtual Private LAN Service (H-VPLS) support, and redundant AC or DC power. They are ideal for service providers seeking to deliver profitable business services, such as Layer 2, Layer 3, and MPLS VPNs, in a variety of bandwidths and with different SLAs.
The metro switches have the PXF chips (which allow hierarchical QoS on the 2 "WAN" GigE ports, so several logical links can share a connection, and have soft bandwidth limits).
For more details on 3750-M switches have a look at this link
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps5532/products_qanda_item09186a00801eb822.shtml
HTH
Ankur
*Pls rate all helpfull post

Comparison between PeopleSoft and Fusion

Hi ,
I need to prepare a document to show up the comparison between PeopleSoft and Fusion. For eg: Business Unit in PeopleSoft and what is the concept in Fusion that is similar to Business Unit. Can anyone help me with a document that will give me detailed comparison between PeopleSoft and Fusion.
Thanks,
Fathima Farsatha

I can't find any comparison on the internal database. Can you add more about your goals with the question? Are you stuck with a Business unit issue or functionality. Since Fusion was built form the ground up it is a completely different software product. If you have a very specific question then we might be able to collaborate with different groups and provide an answer or fix.

Comparison between OATS and QTP

Hi,
Does anyone have a kind of comparison between QTP and Oracle ATS ?
Thanks

Hi
I don't think there is a paper that compares both tools, is there anything in particular that you would like to know?
Regards
Alex

What is the difference/comparison between AppRf and WebCC ?

Q: What is the difference/comparison between AppRf and WebCC ?
A:
Comparison between AppRf and WebCC:
AppRF
WebCC
2300+ Apps under 21 app categories
Millions of URLs under 80+ categories
Need up to 7 packets to classify
Classified once HTTP GET is received
Classification
Classification + Reputation
Need AOS upgrade to get new Apps
Dynamic update of WebCC database
Static content based classification
Dynamic content based categorization / reputation

Or put another way:
Albums organise Photos
Folders organise Albums
A Photo cannot be in a Folder, only in an Album.

Comparison between cFP and cDAQ

Hi,
I'm looking for (as much details as possible) a comparisons between compact Fieldpoint and compact DAQ hardware. I'm trying to decide which hardware platforms to use.
TIA

Compact Fieldpoint is for installed, industrial type applications. It has a realtime operating system. The controller runs code to read inputs and operate outputs. The application can be distributed on an ethernet network. There are different modules available for different types of inputs and ouputs.
Compact DAQ also has numerous input and output modules. It is more intended for portable applications. It connects to your PC through a USB port. So the code would need to run on the PC

Comparison between webdynpro and adobe forms

Hi All,
I want to compare Adobe v/s webdynpro.Can anybody tell me some pros and cons of webdynpro over Adobe?
Thanks.

Hi Shweta,
This is a little bit "chalk and cheese".
WebDypro is an application programming environment with huge functionality which you can use to create any online application.
Adobe forms are a forms based UI which can talk to an application programming environment such as WebDynpro, or a business process environment such as Guided Procedures if it is available, but can also work independently on a PC or laptop without a network connection.
But I assume here you are talking just a WebDynpro "form" i.e. a UI, versus an Adobe form?
Think of it this way:
Adobe forms are a forms specific technology - WebDynpro forms aren't - they are part an application technology
Adobe forms can be used offline and printed with no additional effort - WebDynpro applications are only used online, and print functionality needs to be specifically added (other than printing straight from the Web Browser which really isn't the same thing at all)
Adobe includes a number of features to support offline processing and later upload - such as barcode generation - (you can fully or partially enter data in a form which generates the barcode, then print it and swipe the barcode with a reader), digital signatures, intelligent protection of fields, and offline button features (e.g. to return a form via email) - WebDynpro doesn't do anything offline... of course.
And of course there are different skillsets required to create the forms.
But really the main criteria to decide one vs. the other is:
Do you need offline capability? If you do then its clear the choice is Adobe.
Personally I prefer Adobe also if you are likely to be printing the form.
If everything is happening online then really its just an application and other factors will dictate the forms choice, such as available skillsets and the level of integration required with backend systems.
This is also consistent with SAP's current and future direction - SAP is delivering forms as Adobe forms - so they can be used online and offline. Applications SAP delivers using WebDynpro.
Regards,
Jocelyn

Comparisons between X61s and X201s - and X201 and X201s

I have been very happy with my x61s since prchasing it in Jan 2008. However, I need to migrate to a new notebook, want to have a similar experience with the new machine and am therefore considering the X201 series. Can anyone give me a high-level comparison (I've reviewed the tech specs at lenovo.com already) between the x61s and the x201 series? I am also interested in the differences between the x201 and the x201s.
Finally, will the x61 docking base that I purchased for that notebook work on the x201 or x201s?
Thanks!

X61s Specification
Display
12.1" (1024 x 768) XGA
Operating System
Windows Vista Business, Windows XP Professional, Windows Vista Ultimate
Processor
Core 2 Duo 1.6 GHz
Memory
1 GB - 2 GB
Hard Drive
80 GB - 160 GB Serial ATA (5400 - 7200 rpm)
Graphics Card
GMA X3100
Optical Drive
DVD-Writer, DVD±RW (±R DL) / DVD-RAM
Connectivity
Bluetooth 2.0 + EDR (Enhanced Data Rate)
Ethernet (RJ-45 connector)
Wireless LAN
Ports and Expandibility
Audio in
Audio out
Three Hi-Speed USB ports
VGA port
CardBus
Card reader
RJ11 Modem jack
Firewire
Battery
8.2 hours - 9 hours
8 cell 5200 mAh lithium ion
Dimensions
10.6" x 9.4" x 0.8" - 1.4" (26.9cm x 23.9cm x 2cm - 3.6cm)
Weight
3.3 lbs - 3.6 lbs (1.5 kg - 1.63 kg)
Built in Extras
Fingerprint reader
X201s Specification
Display
12.1" (1440 x 900) WXGA+
Operating System
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit Edition
Processor
Core i7 2.13 GHz
Memory
4 GB - 8 GB
Hard Drive
320 GB Serial ATA (7200 rpm)
Graphics Card
GMA HD
Optical Drive
DVD-Writer
Connectivity
Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR (Enhanced Data Rate)
Ethernet (RJ-45 connector)
Wireless LAN
Ports and Expandibility
Audio in
Audio out
Three Hi-speed USB ports
VGA port
Express card 54
5-in-1 card reader
RJ11 Modem jack
Battery
7.4 hours
6 cell lithium ion
Dimensions
11.6" x 8.3" x 1.4" (29.46cm x 21.08cm x 3.56cm)
Weight
2.7 lbs (1.22 kg)
Built in Extras
Fingerprint reader
X201 Specification
Display
12.1" 1280 x 800 (WXGA)
Operating System
Windows 7 Professional
Processor
Core i5 2.53 GHz
Memory
2 GB - 8 GB
Hard Drive
250 GB Serial ATA (5400 rpm) / 320 GB Serial ATA (7200 rpm)
Graphics Card
GMA HD
Optical Drive
DVD-Writer
Connectivity
Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR (Enhanced Data Rate)
Ethernet (RJ-45 connector)
Wireless LAN
Ports and Expandibility
Audio in
Audio out
Three USB 2.0 ports
5-in-1 card reader
RJ11 Modem jack
Battery
6.7 hours
6 cell llithium ion
Dimensions
11.6" x 8.3" x 1.4" (29.64cm x 21cm x 3.56cm)
Weight
3.2 lbs (1.45 kg)
Built in Extras
Fingerprint reader
Webcam
Knowledge is of two kinds. We know a subject ourselves, or we know where we can find information on it.
ThinkPad T510 4313-CTO Windows 8 x64 - Intel Core i7-620M - NVIDIA NVS 3100M - 8GB RAM - 240GB SSD- Intel Centrino Ultimate-N 6300 - Gobi 2000.
ThinkPad Helix 3697-CTO Windows 8.1 x64 - Intel Core i7-3667U - Intel HD Graphics 4000 - 8GB RAM- 256GB SSD - Intel Centrino Advanced-N 6205 - Ericsson C5621gw

Comparison between ARIS and RBE Plus

Hi,
Can anyone provide or can point me to some comparative study between the ARIS and RBE Plus with respect to their features and capability of business process re-engineering and integration with SAP Solution Manager.
Regards
Nilay

I absolutely agree that RBE Plus and ARIS are complimentary solutions.
Dont mix up RBE (or RBE 2.0, SAP RBE) and RBE Plus. RBE doesn't really support 4.7 systems and higher and has no integration with SAP Solution Manager. RBE Plus supports SAP R/3 3.1i and higher and several other SAP systems like BW, SEM and CRM. RBE Plus uses the SAP standard interface to populate the reference model (BPR) from SAP within the SAP Solution Manager. RBE Plus doesnt look only on the transaction usage for the evaluation of the Business Process Repository but even more important analyzes if and how the SAP tables are actually used. If a customer doesnt use the SAP standard transaction VA01 for creating his sales orders but uses ZA01 instead the analysis of the sales documents still will activate the sales order process.

The diff between WLI and Workshop

I hear people use 2 terms WLI (WebLogic Integration -?) and Workshop interchangeably.
Do these two terms represent the same thing? What are the differences if any?
When i click on WLI at dev2dev i get Workshop doc. So, why not to use 1 term?
Thanks,
Greg the Pro

You can think of WLI as a separate product that Workshop knows how to
integrate with (and is currently the only practical way to develop WLI
components with).
It's separate because Workshop is a general IDE that is also used for
other J2EE development and Weblogic functions.
Think of another IDE like Eclipse being Workshop. Then think of how
Eclipse can have built-in integration with things like Ant and XML.
Eclipse isn't Ant or XML, it's an IDE that can be used with it. WLI
would be a product like this.
If you need any more clarification, I'd suggest trying out the products
and reading the docs for a bit.
Thanks
Greg the Pro wrote:
Thanks Steve,
Still it's not clear. Can you exemplify ? Is WLI a subfunction of the Workshop?
Is WLI a separate product? If yes, why?
GtP
Steven Ostrowski <[email protected]> wrote:
They're not the same thing. Workshop is a general IDE plus some
framework code that can be used with either just Weblogic Server, or
with the entire Weblogic Platform.
WLI is an extension to the Weblogic Server + Workshop framework that
supports things like business process management, worklist, etc. You
can
also edit WLI components in Workshop.
Greg the Pro wrote:
I hear people use 2 terms WLI (WebLogic Integration -?) and Workshopinterchangeably.
Do these two terms represent the same thing? What are the differencesif any?
When i click on WLI at dev2dev i get Workshop doc. So, why not touse 1 term?
Thanks,
Greg the Pro

Comparison between E70 and N91

I've been waiting for the E70 for a while now, and it looks like it's going to be available very soon now and I'll be asking my manager if I can upgrade my 6680 to one.
The reason I wanted one was for the VOIP connectivity and WLAN... Are there any feature differences between the E70 and the N91 which I've recently been recommended? A few things I would really like to know are:
1. Do the two phones do VOIP the same? since the E70 is a business phone I was presuming that would be more geared towards that.
2. Are there any other reasons why I would want an E70 over an N91? They both have WLAN, both have S60 3.0, The only difference I can see is the N91 has a 4GB harddrive and the E70 has the flip-out screen.
Any recommendations one way or the other would be fantastic
My Phone: Nokia E70 - Firmware 1.0610.05.07 (30-05-06) - PC Suite 6.81.22
Be kind... if you find posts helpful, answer 'Yes' below

I know there's differences, and they're each geared towards different things, gut they're practically the same from a specs point of view... It would be more like comparing an Audi A4 and a VW Passat, both practically the same engine, same interior and same extras, just packaged and marketed differently:
Both are S60 3.0
Both have WLAN
Both have the SIP stack
Both can do music, even though the N91 is better at it
Both can do VOIP, even though the E70 is probably better at it
Both can do email
What I'm trying to find out is... Without having one of each to look at side-by-side, what are the features that one really out-performs the other on? You mentioned the music player is different, how different?
I would quite like to use the music player and the 4GB harddrive, but since work would be paying for it I would like to make sure it could do everything the E70 could do without any big drawbacks (eg. If the N91 didn't actually have a VOIP client and the E70 did, that would be bad enough for me not to get it)
My Phone: Nokia E70 - Firmware 1.0610.05.07 (30-05-06) - PC Suite 6.81.22
Be kind... if you find posts helpful, answer 'Yes' below

Comparison between ODI and Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Hi,
As per my knowledge Oracle has provided two infrastructures, namely ODI and ESB for migrating data across applications.
My query is where I should use ESB and where ODI. Is there any comparison document available? I heard that for bulk data movement ODI is suggested by Oracle. Is there any benchmark exists for comparing these two tools?
I also want to map these tools with Oracle E-Business suite's conversion process. Is it possible to map each stage of a traditional Conversion Process (Data Loading, Validating, Importing to Oracle EBusiness Suite) using these tools?
Any kind of help/idea will be very much appreciated.
Regards.
Tapas

I also think that same way. I do not know what is so apecial about BEA Aqualogic ESB and other market matured ESB products such as TIBCO & SONIC. The samples which BEA has given in their evaluation guide are very simplistic. BEA should do more to provide extensive knowledge/features about their Aqualogic line of products.

Performance comparison between "if" and precondition

Hi,
I was wondering was is the performance of precondtions compare to if-end statements. In other words, is it faster:
if (A)
B
else if (C)
D
end
or:
B with Precondtion A
D with Precondtion C
Regards,
Alexandre

1. I'm not saying that the number of executions shouldn't exceed the number of cores. Executions typically block waiting for disk, instrument I/O, shared resources, etc. In this case, it is good to have another thread available to use the otherwise idle core. However, if you generate a test case of multiple threads doing nothing but continuous computations (teststand or not), you will see not see a speed up after you run out of cores. In fact, the context switching involved in sharing the few cores among the many threads will start to decrease overall throughput.
2. I wasn't specifically saying anything about Preconditions or If's. To execute each step, TestStand accesses data about the step's properties and about the module to call. This data is protected by thread locks, which is the reason you can set property and variables from any TestStand thread and not worry about corrupting the state of the individual values. However, providing this protection means that when multiple threads try to access the same data or locks, one thread must briefly wait for the other, even if they are on different cores. Accessing this data doesn't take a long time in absolute terms, but if the step module itself is doing nearly nothing, then this overhead will dominate your measurements and the period of time that the cores can execute independently will be at its minimum.
While the points above will be true regardless, we are investigating the performance results that I believe you reported to our PSE.

Comparisons between WLI and SeeBeyond e*Gate Integrator?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for