Compatibility between XI3.0 with ESR 7.0 Ehp1 release

Customer has a scenario where content is built in ESR 7.0 Ehp1 release and will like to use it in XI 3.0
Is this scenario supported? Any official documentation will be helpful.
Regards,
Arpit

I dont think this is supported.
I tried to import IR content from 7.1 to 7.0 but those files are not being recognized by 7.0.
Venkat.

Similar Messages

  • Compatibility between MII with different patch levels.

    Hi all,
    I know that the best solution is to have the same MII patch level in MII development environment and in produztion enviroment.
    For many reasons that aren't  under my direct controli, we'll have an MII 12.0.5 in development and MII 12.0.8 in production.
    Are there any point to verify? Can we export from development environment and deploy to production without any changes?
    On the contrary, what about having the development environment at a higher patch level than production enviroment (e.g 12.0.8 in development and deploy the solution on a 12.0.5 prduction enviroment)?
    Thank in advance for your responses/experiences on this subject.
    Best wishes for a nice 2010

    Hi,
    If you transfer from lower patches to higher patches there will not be any problem as such.
    In the otherhand if you trying to export the project from higher to lower patch  there you have the problem. Becuase some bugs might have been fixed in the higher patch those are not avaialble in the lower. For example in some date function of BLS might have been fixed in updated patch,the same you copied then that particulr function will not work in the lower patch and the BLS will come with errors.
    Hope this helps you.
    -Suresh
    Edited by: Suresh Hiremath on Jan 7, 2010 12:11 PM

  • Compatibility between SAP ERP upgrade with SAP PI 7.3 sp12

    Hi Experts,
    Our SAP ERP system getting upgraded to ECC 6.0, ehp 7, SS7 and we need to check its compatibility with the current SAP PI version(7.3 sp09) and its future upgraded version which is sp12.
    Would any one kindly help me to track the PI system compatibility with the ERP upgraded version and its adverse effect(if any) on interfaces between PI and ECC system?
    Thanks
    Navneet.

    Hi Navneet
    If your PI is already on 7.3, it is compatible with ECC6 EHP7. For more details refer to the SAP note that is mentioned in my reply on the thread below.
    Compatibility between PI 7.11 and Ehp7 for ERP6
    Rgds
    Eng Swee

  • EP 7.0 SP17 compatibility with BI 7.1 (EHP1)

    Hi There,
    We are in the process of upgrading our BW 3.5 system to BI 7.1 (7.0
    EHP1).
    Our Central Portal is running on EP 7.0 with Support Package 17 with
    all necessary BI Java Components/SCAs and planning to use Central
    Portal for BI i.e without Federated Portal.
    Please clarify following with respect to upgrading BI to 7.1 and
    leaving Central Portal on EP 7.0 SP17.
    1) Can EP 7.0 SP17 integrate with BI 7.1 (EHP1)?
    2) What are the limitations without EHP1 on EP 7.0
    3) What are the limitations without Federated Portal?
    We would appreciate your comments on this.
    Regards
    Chandu

    hi,
    can you look at this
    [BI upgrade|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/2e8e5288-0b01-0010-2ea8-bcd4df5084a7?overridelayout=true]
    Regards,
    Muralidhar

  • Compatibility between Java crypto and open ssl

    Hello
    I have some question about compatibility between java crypto and openssl library.
    This is my case:
    1.I created DESede key and stored it to file:
    SecretKey key = KeyGenerator.getInstance("TripleDES").generateKey();
    File f = new File("c:\\key.dat");
    DataOutputStream dos =new DataOutputStream(new FileOutputStream(f));
    dos.write(key.getEncoded());
    dos3.close();2.I encrypt some file "c:\\normal.dat" through:
    ecipher.init(Cipher.ENCRYPT_MODE, key2);
      byte[] enc = ecipher.doFinal(normalData);
      File f2 = new File("c:\\enc.dat");
      DataOutputStream dos =new DataOutputStream(new FileOutputStream(f2));
      dos.write(enc);
      dos.close();

    You have carefully left out some critical java code, namely the Cipher.getInstance() method. You'll notice in the documentation for this method that there 3 components to the "transform" argument of this method, the algorithm, the mode, and the padding. All of these must match exactly with the what openssl is using. Furthermore, if you are using one of the modes which require an IV, like CBC mode, then this must match exactly too. If you don't explicitly specify some of these parameters, you might get default values supplied. It is up to you to find out what these are.

  • Compatibility between CRM 4.0 and IS-U 4.64

    Hi,
    My company is using SAP IS-U 4.64 and is studying the use of SAP CRM. Does there is any problem of processus compatibility between these two versions ?
    I don't find any document on the market place or in sdn. Does there is a document that shows the optimization for cross application use of SAP ?
    Thanks
    Thomas

    Hi Gaurav,
    I've dealt with both realities (specially in IC Webclient) and from the configuration point of view and in my opinion, it is basically the same.
    For me the main change is that, in IC webclient scenario, instead of you do some customizing in a XML code, in CRM5 you'll do it by configuring tables.
    In CRM5, you'll have some nice functionalities that CRM4 doesn't have (e.g.: You can choose with channels your transactions are allowed, Email Workbench, ERMS categorization is time dependent, and so on...), but the big jump is given when you compare CRM5 to CRM6 (or CRM 2007).
    Kind regards,
    Bruno

  • I have a web site built by Yahoo Web Site Builder which does not have a Mac version, is there any compatability between Iweb and the old Yahoo program?

    I have a web site built by Yahoo Web Site Builder which does not have a Mac version, is there any compatability between Iweb and the old Yahoo program? If not how do I clear off the old site so as to re publish with Iweb.

    iWeb cannot import published files so you would need rebuild the site.
    Yahoo hosting is notoriously poor and their tech support is awful. I would suggest you look for new hosting and start afresh. Some pointers for choosing hosting...
    http://www.iwebformusicians.com/iWeb/Website-Hosting.html
    If you do choose to go this route, transfer your domain name registration away from Yahoo to your new host.

  • Still no compatibility between Storage Client Library v3 and emulator?

    Hi,
    According to this blog post:
    I'm apparently unable to post a link, but here's the text from the blog. I'm sure you can find it via google if interested.)
    <<<<
    Storage Emulator Guidance
    As mentioned above an updated Windows Azure Storage Emulator is expected to ship with full support of these new features in the next couple of months. Users attempting to develop against the current version of the Storage emulator will receive Bad Request
    errors as the protocol version (2013-08-15) is unsupported.  Until then, users wanting to use the new features would need to develop and test against a Windows Azure Storage Account to leverage the 2013-08-15 REST version.
    >>>>
    So it seems there was not compatibility between the storage emulator and Storage Client Library v3. I'm wondering if that is still the case. I get a 400 error when calling container.CreateIfNotExists() when pointing to local storage, but no problem pointing
    to production storage. I'm using SCL v3.0.2.
    Thanks...
    -Ben

    Hi,
    Please see
    http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsazure/en-US/c961d0df-e6ab-4563-958c-b3646ee2cd9d/the-value-for-one-of-the-http-headers-is-not-in-the-correct-format?forum=windowsazuredevelopment#16892f11-498d-4975-aa4b-adfa12b03fea
    Here is a snippet of this thread.
    Storage Emulator 2.2 is currently incompatible with Storage Client Library 3.0.0.0. This has been mentioned in Storage Team Blob as well:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/windowsazurestorage/archive/2013/11/27/windows-azure-storage-release-introducing-cors-json-minute-metrics-and-more.aspx (Please
    read "Storage Emulator Guidance" section towards the end of the post).
    It may be fixed in the next version.
    Hope this helps
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • Distributed File System Replication between servers with different performance

    If Distributed File System Replication is set between servers with different performance. What will happen with the performance of the fastest server? Will the performance decrease to match the performance of the
    slowest server in the chain? I mean, will the source slow down (processor speed) if the recipients can't keep up? 

    Hi,
    If you mix different performance server for DFS replication, most of improvements on the fastest server are disabled for backwards compatibility and the performance decrease to match the performance of the slowest server.
    For more detailed information, please refer to the article below:
    Tuning replication performance in DFSR (especially on Win2008 R2)
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/askds/archive/2010/03/31/tuning-replication-performance-in-dfsr-especially-on-win2008-r2.aspx
    Best Regards,
    Mandy 
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here .
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • What  are the Technical  differences Between XI3.0/PI7.0/PI7.1

    hi experts can any one give me brief idea about all the versions.
    Both technically and performance point of view.

    Hi,
    There is no different between XI3.0 and PI 7.0 but there is a lot difference in XI3.0/PI 7.0 and PI 7.1.
    Refer the below thread for Xi and PI difference:
    PI 7.0 and XI 3.0
    there are many threads with sme topics
    New highlights for SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1 are:
    •     Enterprise Services Repository as a central storage location for enterprise service definitions and lifecycle management data for all enterprise services
    •     Universal Description, Discovery, and Integration (UDDI) 3.0–compliant services registry for runtime management of enterprise services
    •     Improved support for standards such as Web Service Reliable Messaging (WS-RM), WS Policy, Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML)
    •     Extended support for high volume scenarios
    •     Business Activity Monitoring for process definition of milestone monitoring (event correlation)
    •     Improved SAP NetWeaver Administrator support for central configuration and administration of both mediated and point-to-point scenarios.
    •     XML payload validation
    •     Process editor modeling enhancements: step groups, integrated alert management, configurable parameters
    •     Integration of human interaction (generic user decision)
    •     WS-BPEL 2.0 preview.
    •     Message Packing.
    •     Local Processing in Adapter Engine.
    •     Reusable UDF’s.
    •     Lookup function with multiple results.
    Refer the below link form where the most of the above information has been taken:
    1) Capability and Enhancements of SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/community/capabilityandEnhancementsofSAPNetWeaverProcessIntegration7.1&
    2) New SAP NetWeaver Process Integration:
    /people/udo.paltzer/blog/2007/04/26/new-sap-netweaver-process-integration-release-planned-for-2007
    3) Enhancement in PI 7.1:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/profile/2007/07/27/briefdescriptionaboutEnhancementinPI7.1&focusedCommentId=40564
    4) SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1 - Overview of New Capabilities:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/706005a3-3bd6-2910-91ae-a2016239bdcf
    5) SAP NetWeaver PI 7.1
    /people/daniel.bianchin/blog/2007/12/19/all-you-wanted-to-know-about-sap-netweaver-pi-71-and-more
    This section has all the relevant links for each topics:
    •     Enterprise Services Repository:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4073b4c4-7137-2a10-a5a9-abb618b7a5e7
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e0301486-758c-2a10-9d84-a195556df422
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/903a4127-5403-2a10-0a96-e9452c3ab1de
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c0f90f22-678c-2a10-91a0-f1f1bf7ff191
    •     Usability Features in SAP NetWeaver PI 7.1 Development and Configuration Times
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a0e7734f-e969-2a10-24b6-df58a710941c
    •     Advance adapter engine:
    /people/william.li/blog/2008/01/10/advanced-adapter-engine-configuration-in-pi-71
    /people/william.li/blog/2008/02/07/display-adapter-synchronous-message-content-in-rwb-of-pi-71
    •     Preview on New Features of the Integration Directory in SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10c0de4b-7876-2a10-e286-8412668643a8
    •     Usability Features in SAP NetWeaver PI 7.1 Development and Configuration Times:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a0e7734f-e969-2a10-24b6-df58a710941c
    •     SAP Network Blog: Share User-Defined Functions in Message Mappings of PI 7.1
    /people/william.li/blog/2008/01/02/sap-pi-71-mapping-enhancements-series-share-user-defined-functions
    •     Preview on New Features of the Integration Directory in SAP NetWeaver Process Integration 7.1
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10c0de4b-7876-2a10-e286-8412668643a8
    •     SAP Network Blog: Mapping Enhancements in SAP NetWeaver Process Integration (PI) 7.1
    /people/jin.shin/blog/2008/01/11/sap-pi-71-mapping-enhancements-series-mapping-enhancements-demo
    •     New Business Process Engine Features in SAP NetWeaver Process Integration
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e0068bc1-6f8c-2a10-52bb-c6ee3562feb2
    •     Folders for more flexible and organized way of development.
    /people/william.li/blog/2007/08/07/using-folders-in-pi-71 -- Folders in PI 7.1
    •     High Volume support in PI 7.1
    /people/holger.faulhaber/blog/2007/12/12/high-volume-support-in-pi-71
    •     Upgrade to SAP NetWeaver PI 7.1
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/8085e299-718c-2a10-de94-928f62b763ce
    chirag

  • Compatibility between the iPhone 6 and certain vehicles, and the hands free connectivity in those vehicles?

    How can I findout about the compatibility between the iPhone 6 and certain vehicles, and the hands free connectivity in those vehicles?
    I am interested in the iPhone 6 but have several meetings that have to call into for work.  Where can I find out about the compatibility with iPhone 6 and if there are issues I need to be aware of for connecting to hands free option in the car?
    Please point me to the right direction. The dealership was useless in helping me. I figured Verizon can be more helpful.

        ShaM1,
    I understand the importance of the bluetooth compatibility between your new device and your car.  What make and model is your vehicle? 
    Here is the information that Verizon Wireless has on Bluetooth Car Kit compatibility; http://www.verizonwireless.com/support/how-to-use-bluetooth-car-kit-compatibility/.  However, Apple does not have any information listed here.  We can assume that the latest and greatest iPhone 6 has the technology to be compatible with most vehicles.  If you'd like to discover further information I'd suggest contacting Apple directly; 800-275-2273.
    Let us know if you need anything else!
    TrevorC_VZW
    Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

  • Compatibility Between Audigy 2 Drive and Audigy 2 ZS GAMER C

    Greetings,
    I had a question about compatibility between an Audigy 2 Dri've and an Audigy 2 ZS Card.
    Specifically, the Sound Blaster Audigy 2 Platinum Sound Card and the Sound Blaster Audigy2 ZS GAMER Edition Sound Card (SB0350).
    Is the Audigy2 ZS GAMER Sound Card compatible with the Audigy 2 Platinum Dri've?
    If this particular question has already been addressed in another thread, my apologies.
    Thanks,
    Benwajones

    I searched (on "external" and "bay," but not "dri've" before I posted) but did not see this message. Is the reverse possible - that is a Audigy original dri've and an Audigy 2ZS sound card?

  • Compatibility between Exchange 2007 service packs

    Hi all, I have 5 servers Exchange:
    - 3 Servers CAS and HUB
    - 2 Servers Mailbox server in Microsoft Failover Cluster (MSCS)
    Domain Controllers are all
    Windows Server 2003 SP2
    The versions of Exchange 2007 SP1 servers are all:
    8.1 Build 240.6
    I have thought about installing SP3 and RU13 in all 5 servers for Exchange, but I'm going to install SP3 and RU13 on 2 servers CAS / HUB and the following week at the other CAS / HUB server.
    Finally, the following week in the two Mailbox Servers.
    Is there any problem if I miss 2 servers CAS / HUB with SP3 RU13 and the other CAS / HUB in SP1, this will only be for a few days?
    Is there any problem if I leave the servidors Mailbox Servers in SP1 while CAS / HUB are in SP3 RU13, this will only be for a few days?
    regards
    Microsoft Certified IT Professional Server Administrator

    Hi Yupikaiey.
    Only thing you should be concerned is if you have CAS-CAS proxy or the Mailbox Cluster part.
    Your current plan looks good. Just stay alert for any uncommon issues popping up, which would normally mean due to the difference.
    If you upgrade your servers in this order, you may avoid potential service interruptions.
    Details below:
    Version Constrains are more of between roles of 2007-2010-2013 and not between same version SPs or RUs.
    Exchange 2013 Server Role Architecture
    The Past: Exchange 2007 and Exchange 2010
    Our goal was to make these server roles autonomous units. Unfortunately, that goal did not materialize in either Exchange 2007 or Exchange 2010. The server roles were tightly coupled along four key dimensions:
    2.This also necessitated a tight versioning alignment – a down-level Hub Transport or Client Access shouldn’t communicate with a higher version Mailbox server; in some cases this was enforced (e.g., Exchange 2007 Hub Transport servers cannot deliver messages
    to Exchange 2010 Mailbox servers), but in other cases they were not (e.g., an Exchange 2010 SP1 Client Access server can render data from an Exchange 2010 SP2 Mailbox server).
    The versioning restriction also meant that you could not simply upgrade a single server role to take advantage of new functionality – you had to upgrade all of them.
    The Present: Exchange Server 2013
    If I upgrade the Mailbox server with a service pack or cumulative update, then for a given mailbox hosted on that server, all data rendering and content conversions for that mailbox will be local, thus removing version constraints and functionality issues
    that arose in previous releases.
    Exchange 2007 Servicing
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-in/library/dd421853(v=exchg.80).aspx
    Deployment Order
    Our test infrastructure guarantees that Exchange hotfixes work across multiple server roles. The order in which you apply the update rollup to the servers is not important except if you are deploying CAS-CAS proxying. Because the update rollups are not segmented
    for different Exchange server roles or for specific file configurations, apply each update rollup package to all Exchange 2007 servers in your environment.
    If you have multiple Active Directory sites, and if you deploy a Client Access server in the proxy sites that do not face the Internet, you must
    apply the update rollup to the Internet-facing Client Access servers
    and to the non-Internet-facing Client Access servers in the proxy site simultaneously. For other Exchange 2007 configurations, we recommend that you
    apply the update rollup package to the Client Access servers before
    you apply it to servers that are running other Exchange 2007 server roles, such as the Mailbox server role, the Hub Transport server role, and the Edge Transport server role.
    Note:
    Applying service packs and update rollups to clustered Mailbox servers requires specific planning and application steps. For more information about how to apply service packs to Exchange 2007 clustered Mailbox servers, see
    Upgrading Clustered Mailbox Servers to Exchange 2007 SP1 or later. For more information about how to apply update rollups to Exchange 2007 clustered Mailbox servers, see
    Applying Exchange 2007 Update Rollups to Clustered Mailbox Servers.
    For Patching and compatibility between versions:
    Determine the service pack level of Exchange. 
    Update rollups are service pack dependent. For example, an Update Rollup 5 package is available for Exchange 2007 and for Exchange 2007 Service Pack 1. To determine the service pack level of Exchange, examine the
    ExchangeVersion property. For more information about how to view the
    ExchangeVersion property and about the build number that is associated with each Exchange version, see
    Exchange Server 2007: Platforms, Editions, and Versions.
    References:
    How to Install the Latest Service Pack or Update Rollup for Exchange 2007
    Exchange Server Updates: build numbers and release dates
    We are looking at doing the roll-up to SP3
    Coexistence of Exchange2007 SP1 and Exchange 2007 SP3
    Regards,
    Satyajit
    Please “Vote As Helpful”
    if you find my contribution useful or “Mark As Answer” if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.

  • File compatibility between CS 5.5 MAC and CS 5.5 PC?

    We are currently a PC based shop with a few MAC's tossed here and there.  I have been asked to verify the file compatibility between CS 5.5 MAC and CS 5.5 PC.  Are the files fully compatible?  i.e. can user A on a PC create an illustrator/photoshop/etc document which is then opened by user B on a MAC with no issues?
    Thanks!

    Yes. For the programs you mentioned it has been forever this way and even for programs like Premiere Pro or Encore, that were platform-specific until recently, this is no longer an issue ever since CS5. Of course you will still have to take care of different handling for file paths on different platforms for externally linked files, but that's a different matter and nothing specific to Adobe...
    Mylenium

  • Compatibility between 32 bit and 64 bit of TimesTen

    Hi All,
    Please tell me is there any document avialable to see compatibility between 32 bit and 64 bit of TimesTen ?
    Regards
    Pratheej

    Hi Pratheej,
    1. You cannot replicate between 32 and 64 bit TimesTen.
    2. For direct mode connections, the application must be the same 'bittedness' as TimesTen 932-bit app -> 32-bit TT, 64-bit app to 64-bit TT).
    3. For client/server connections a 32-bit app can work with both 32 and 64 bit TT. A 64-bit app can only use 64-bit TT.
    If you want to deploy a 32-bit app using 64-bit TT on the same machine we have an optimised shared memory client/server connection (shmipc) mode. This is much faster than TCP or Unix sockets but is still much slower than direct mode.
    HTH,
    Chris

Maybe you are looking for