Compatibility Checker
Hi,
I downloaded the Aperature 2.0 Compatibility Checker, it's saved to my desktop but I can't delete it. When I open it and try deleting it, it says I don't have sufficient permissions to delete? Any help?
Thanks!
Scott
Hmmm...
Okay then, you can do it with terminal
Open terminal (in Applications/Utilities)
Type
sudo rm -rf
And then drag the Aperture compatibility checker application to the terminal window. It should auto complete the line by adding something like "~/Desktop/Aperture Compatiblity Checker.app"
Hit return, and enter your password, and it should be gone.
Similar Messages
-
Microsoft Office Excel - compatibility Checker message in BPC 7.5
Hello Experts,
We are using BPC 7.5 M with Office 2007 on Application Server, we have upgraded from BPC 5.1 with Office 2003 where Dimension were of .xls and templates & Reports were of .xlt (office 2003 format) , After upgrade we have not done any changes in Dimension, Templates, reports version and they all are in .xls (Dimension) & .xlt (templates & reports) version
We are getting a error while saving a dimension in Admin module (by clicking on "Save to Server" link):
Microsoft Office Excel - compatibility Checker
Significant loss of functionality
Some cells have overlapping conditional formatting ranges.
Earlier version of Excel will not evaluate all of the conditional
formatting rules on the overlapping cells. The overlapping
cells will show different conditional formatting.
Do we need to convert the dimension files in 2007 format (.xlsx) or how to avoid the above told message while saving dimension file.
Thanks,
RohitHi Rohit Khatak,
Could you solve your problem? I'm having this issue while processing ACCOUNT dimension (and only ACCOUNT) on Development environment, and nothing was changed at the server.
Every time I try to save, I receive this compatibility error, and when I press "Continue", the file gets with a strange format. If I press the save again, it stil gives me the same error.
I already tryed to process the dimension, to Refresh Dimension Members, and the error persists.
Is there a way to solve this problem at BW side? On RSD1 maybe?
Thanks in advance.
Yours,
Adriano -
Windows 2003 to Windows 2008 - tools to help do compatibility checks
Is there any way to do a compatibility check prior to running the Windows 2008 upgrade on a windows 2003 standalone server. Any tools that might help me see issues prior to.
Thanks in advancedHi,
Meanwile, hope the following articles help:
Guide for Upgrading to Windows Server 2008
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc755199(v=ws.10).aspx
Application Considerations When Upgrading to Windows Server 2008
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/72b1e424-a856-4d2b-9b2c-6ad4f8f78e23#BKMK_Application_compatibility
Upgrading to Windows Server 2008http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc754728(v=ws.10).aspx
Regards.
Vivian Wang -
Each time I start Firefox a "Checking Compatibility of Add-ons" update window appears, which redirects me to a welcome to Firefox 5.0 page with my normal home page in another tab. I tried disabling all add-ons and updates as well as the force compatibility checker. I think my AVG safe-search bar might be causing the problem, but I have it disabled and never use it. Please help me get rid of this.
See:
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Preferences_not_saved -
How to re-enable FF 29 add-on compatibility check
Several weeks ago I installed FF 29.0.1 on two virtually-identical XP systems. I've been carefully maintaining extensions, settings, etc., in parallel on both systems.
Initially, my primary system told me if an extension in my search list was incompatible with 29.0.1, and presumably that's what I want to happen.
However, I recently installed a couple of extensions, that seemed to work okay. (I had downloaded the installers, and then installed them from the files.) Then, when I tried to install them from the same files on the second system, it told me that they were incompatible with 29.0.1, and that they could not be installed.
I want to re-enable the compatibility check on the system on which it seems to have been turned off. I've searched FF forums at length, but can't find any information on about:config or other settings that might affect this.The error message I've been getting on one system when trying to install certain extensions is a small drop-down box from the green extensions manager icon near the upper left of the screen. However, it disappears when the "print screen" button is pressed, and does not appear in the captured image. I've noticed that kind of quirk on some other websites. So it seems to be impossible to get an image of the message. The message can be re-displayed, but not printed, by clicking on the green icon. However, the text of the message says, "<extension-name> could not be installed because it is not compatible with Firefox 29.0.1." Note: It is easy to reproduce this message by temporarily turning on extensions.strictCompatibility, and trying to install some older extensions.
In any event, the system on which I was getting the message is now behaving identically to my other system, apparently without any settings changes. Therefore, I feel that it was a persistent, but temporary, glitch that may have been fixed by a reboot. Therefore, the problem seems to be resolved. -
Compatibility check - ECC 5.0 - CRM2007
Greetings All and HAPPY FRIDAY!
in regards to compatibility check- basically I'm trying to determine that the CRM6.0 and ECC 5.0 are on compatible support packs, version, etc.
For example, like what levels we need to be on in ECC5.0 for CRM 2007 (ie. PI, PI_BASIS in the ecc5.0 box its 2006_1_640 in crm 2006_1_700
, etc)
I was trying to use the SAP matrix page service.sap.com/pam to show us the compatibility matches like what levels we need to be on in ecc5 for crm
but I get no info there...
Any advice or tips would be greatly appreciatedHello,
If you want to know the compatibility regarding CRM2007, please refer to the SAP CRM2007 Master guide. You can download this document from the following link:
http://service.sap.com/crm-inst
-> SAP CRM 2007
-> CRM Product
If you want to know about plug-in, please check the following site:
http://service.sap.com/r3-plug-in.
Hope this helps. -
Installer 2011DS1: hand crafted disk labels for compatibility checks?
I have a problem with the installer of Labview 2011 DS1in combination with Vision. I want to create an installer for an application that uses vision and therefore selected the additional installers "NI Vision Common Resources 2010 SP1" and "NI Vision Run-Time Engine 2010 SP1". The assistant then asks for the disk "NI Developer Suite 2011 DS1 - DVD 2". When I insert that disk the assistant complains
"The disk you have provided is a different version of the requested disk.
Disk Requested: NI Developer Suite 2011 DS1 - DVD 2
Disk Provided: NI Developer Suite 2011 DS1 DVD 2
It seems, a litte missing hyphen in the disk name prevents me from deploying my application. You could argue to simply choose another DVD containing the run time engine. This leads to an overwhelming list of disk alternatives one has to manually click through in order to find another variant of the installer. The assistant knows what installer is missing and obviously knows whether the selected disks contain this installer but it is unable to filter the list to show applicable alternatives only.
After a lot of clicks, I found another disk containing the vision runtime. It is "NI Vision Developer Module 2010 SP 1" and when I insert a DVD that is labelled exacly the same, the assistant complains:
"The disk you have provided is a valid installer, but it does not match the disk requested.
Disk Requested: NI Vision Developer Module 2010 SP 1
Disk Provided: VDM2010SP1DVD
There is an alternative Disk that seems to have the same label as my DVD and so I selected "VDM2010SP1DVD", click "Yes" and of course get the error message I have attached. After that message, nothing else happens. At least no installer for my application is created.
Is there any way to create an installer with Labview 2011 SP1? Could you please refrain from using obviously hand crafted disk labels for compatibility checks?
With best regards
C. Manteuffel
Attachments:
installer_error.gif 7 KBI had something similar happen recently, see:
http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/LV2010-SP1-Installer-Build-Issue-Cannot-find-the-file-it-need-on/m-p...
I copied the VDM DVD to my hard drive and it came up on the list of alternative choices. Selected that folder and it finally completed the installer.
-AK2DM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"It’s the questions that drive us.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -
Iphone video file compatibility checker?
I have a bunch of video files in mp4 and m4v in a folder. Some copy to my iphone when added to my itunes library, others don't with the error FILE CAN NOT BE PLAYED ON THIS IPHONE. Usually the format for non compatible iphone video files was created for appletv device , but its hard to tell which files will play on the iphone, quick and easily. I was wondering if there was a simple iphone video compatibility checker. Like looking at video files listed in a folder directory, where it displays whether or not a video file is iphone compatible?
If no such file checker exists, it sure would be nice to have such a file checker to look at a batch or folder of files at one time, and easily check iphone compatibility. (hint hint programmers)It appears to me that the only reason cpu speed, would impact play back is that iTunes has designed this effect into the files.
No, they didn't, at least not as part of some sort of deliberate effort to get you to upgrade. Videos and movies from the iTunes Store are encoded with the new H.264 codec. This codec can yield much better quality at a lower file size than can other video codecs such as the most common MPEG-2, but decoding H.264 takes more processing power. Hence the minimum CPU requirement; it just takes that fast a system to decode the content smoothly. In some cases with a system with close specs, you may be able to get adequate playback if all other applications and processes are shut down (as with iTunes vs. QuickTime; iTunes takes up a bit more of the processor for it's other functions), but it's always going to be iffy if you're right at the edge of the system requirements.
You're going to see this sort of thing on any computer system; better quality video requires higher-power systems, no matter what platform you're running on (Windows Media Player recommends 1.5Ghz).
Message was edited by: Dave Sawyer -
firefox compatibility checker runs on each start of FF and Hooray, your FF is up to date always displayed too, have tried all the obvious like resetting homepage, but no joy
see '''Matt_G''' reply in : https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/916778
thank you -
Compatibility check failed for speed
How to resolve following vPC error :-
Compatibility check failed for speed,
thanksWithout more information it is hard to know, but it could be that each switch is configured with different speed for that port.
HTH -
Every time I start Firefox 8.0.1 it repeats the add-on compatibility check
Hi there
I'm using Vista and since updating to Firefox 8.0.1 every single time I start Firefox it repeats the add-on compatibility check.
I tried starting with add-ons disabled, deleting update files, started with different profile, nothing.
Is this a bug and we have to wait for another update or if it can be sorted I would appreciate some help please.
CheersGo to Firefox/Help/Troubleshooting, and in your Profile Directory/Open Profile Folder. Close Firefox (File,Exit) and on your Profile Folder look and delete this file "Pref.js" and any other "pref" files in there. Start Firefox and your preferences are reset to default. Go to Options and customise your preferences as you had before.
-
Microsoft office excel compatibility checker
Microsoft office excel compatibility checker
Hi,
What is your problem with Microsoft office excel compatibility checker?
If you have any issues about Excel, you can post this issue in Excel forum. -
Prevent add-on compatibility check on 1st run
i am using a predefined prefs.js file with '''updates disabled''' and '''compatibility check false''' for add-ons as well
however each time i run firefox for the first time , i see a progress update window saying: checking comparability of add-ons
its important that i do not see this at all. any inout, anything else to look into the pref.js file?
i already have extensions.checkCompatibility.3.6 set to false and updates disabled.
odd thing is when i launch FF, i see all the correct options configured, and upon relaunch this does not happen. seems its during the first time the userprofile is launched
FF 3.6.17that did not work
i ended up adding user_pref("extensions.update.url", ""); to my pref.js, so now when the browser launches for the first time, i see a blank window for less than 1 sec. which was an acceptable solution..
Thanks -
I'm trying to use the new browser compatability check feature
in CS3. It seems useless. It tells me there is an error, but
doesn't tell me WHAT the error is or how to fix it. It just points
me to their website, but there is no reference code of any sort to
reference the error. Are there any tricks to this feature to make
it work better?See these articles for some suggestions:
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Firefox+has+just+updated+tab+shows+each+time+you+start+Firefox
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/How+to+set+the+home+page - Firefox supports multiple home pages separated by '|' symbols
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Preferences_not_saved
Which security software (firewall, anti-virus) do you have? -
I wrote earlier about problems I am having with the correct
presentation of my home page with Safari 3.X and Firefox vs. IE7.
With Dreamweaver CS3 the browser compatibility checker works
with (as one browser example) Safari 1.X and 2.X.
Is there a way to update the checker to deal with the newer
versions of any and all browsers so that the checks can be of more
current use? I already know my site is fine with Safari 2.X, but
the outmoded check can't give me any clues as to what is wrong when
viewed with 3.X, etc.
Thanks.If you have page rending problems run your site through the
W3 validators.
Valid code takes care of most, if not all, rendering problems
in Safari, FF,
Opera and IE7.
http://validator.w3.org/check
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Sorry, I don't know if you can update the browser
compatibility checker
list. I never use it. I run my sites through live browser
checks.
--Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
www.alt-web.com
"MDG123456" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:gbdhuk$msp$[email protected]..
> I wrote earlier about problems I am having with the
correct presentation
of my
> home page with Safari 3.X and Firefox vs. IE7.
>
> With Dreamweaver CS3 the browser compatibility checker
works with (as one
> browser example) Safari 1.X and 2.X.
>
> Is there a way to update the checker to deal with the
newer versions of
any
> and all browsers so that the checks can be of more
current use? I already
know
> my site is fine with Safari 2.X, but the outmoded check
can't give me any
clues
> as to what is wrong when viewed with 3.X, etc.
>
> Thanks.
>
Maybe you are looking for
-
FCC configuration in Sender File Channel Without any key field name
Hi Everyone, We have below flat file generated from ECC using standard tcode. The flat file is fixed length file and first record is header record followed by line items. There is no key field name in the file name. Can we read the file and convert i
-
I have my options set to open new windows as a new tab. But when I do, rather than staying in the tab I'm in (even though I have options set to stay there not go to the new tab immediately) Firefox sends me to ANOTHER Tab that is already opened (neit
-
I have just updated to i0S on my iphone and have lost all my Contacts- when I try and sync from my computer it says that my Contacts have been disabled - help!
-
I'm trying and tryinng to download Firefox on my laptop using os 10.5.8 and cannot do it..My boss has a desktop and running the same program and he has Firefox, how come?????
-
Hi, I am trying to update a field in the customer master using e-catt. The field is not available for mass update in [MASS] so i have to use ecatt (if i cannot do this then i'll think of LSMW or BDC's). I created a script by recording XD02 and then c