Compensation of delay caused by activity

Hi Experts
During the execution phase, it is observed certain activities have taken more duration than the planned.
At this juncture, to cover up the deviation, is there any facility to understand where this lagging can be compensated.
Or, can i use the reduction functionality, to compensate the delay caused by the already executed activities?
warm regards
ramSiva

the quesion is, do you want to compensate the time technically or for your real business case.
Technically you can simply shorten the duration or maintain the remaining duration or forecast fnishdate to compensate the delay. Surely you can using reduction functionality.
In the real life, either the you need more capacity (e.g. instead a person using multipe persons) or the person has to to the night shift.
Kind regards,
Zhenbo

Similar Messages

Delay caused by encryption

Hi Expert,
Could anyone enlighted me on the delay time to be occurred after the encryption (AES 128) is enabled? Below please find the existing information for your reference.
Site A:
Router: 7200VXR
WAN circuit: 5M
Case 1: 256K traffic will be sent from site A to site B and last for 5 minutes.
Case 2: 256K traffic will be sent from site A to site B and last for 5 minutes with AES 128 to be in placed.
Site B:
Router: 7200VXR
WAN circuit: 3M
Case 3: 256K traffic will be sent from site B to site A and last for 5 minutes.
Case 4: 256K traffic will be sent from site B to site A and last for 5 minutes with AES 128 to be in placed.
Any reference URL regarding delay caused by encryption would be much appreciated.
Anita

@Joe D.
I'm using LabVIEW 2010. The actual VI is part of a large, complex system that there would be no way for me to upload here. I've made a simple, bare-bones VI, though, that simulates what we need to do and reproduces the problem. The attached VI requires an img1.jpg and an img2.jpg in the same folder as the VI. Note that we could have much more than 2 images, so although in the example VI re-drawing the images in the hidden picture box isn't necessary, it is needed in our actual system.
@Yamaeda
Thanks again for your suggestions. I looked into pict rings, but I couldn't figure out a way to programmatically populate them. It seemed like all the images had to be loaded ahead of time. I tried the .NET PictureBox without success but I'll give it another shot. It just seems unreasonable to me that displaying an image would take that long. It isn't a restriction due to the Computer or OS itself, because I know this can be done in C++ and I think even in MATLAB. It also seems like no matter what I use to draw or show the image, and whether it's in parallel or not, the delay occurs as if's delaying all of LabVIEW's threads no matter what.
Attachments:
imgDisplay_demo.vi ‏52 KB

Networking Delay Causing Mayhem

First, I know that others have reported networking issues in Leopard. I wanted to start a new topic with my specific issue and see if others are having the same problem.
When accessing a website, sometimes there is a delay of about 10 seconds. Think "Contacting google.com" in Safari. This does not happen when in Windows XP. I am connecting to the Internet through a Netgear GS105 Gigabit Switch to a Linksys WRT350N Router to my Cable Modem.
I did a bit of tinkering in Terminal and found the same behavior when doing "ping google.com". There is a delay of about 10 seconds--sometimes--until I start seeing pings. This ring a few bells for anyone out there?

I fixed my problem! I had to remove the Active Directory stuff from Directory Utility. This has totally eliminated the problem. I hope Apple fixes this as I would like to continue to use AD on this system. At least, I have an interim solution. Hope this helps someone else out there...

IO delay causes buffered streams to hang

I'm writing an application that uses the network and in order to test under slow conditions I created custom input/output streams that just puts in a delay in the basic read() and write(int b) methods before calling the method for the stream passed in the constructor. This allows me to find problems where the interface hangs under slow conditions etc. very quickly.
The problem is that on buffered streams (I have specifically had trouble with BufferedReader and BufferedOutputStream) it causes the stream to just hang. It works fine without the stream with the delay but with it something is causing a hang. I think it may have something to do with the network because I don't have the problem with File IO. Does anybody know why a delay would cause a buffered stream to hang?

Well the I know the socket has not timed out. I usually set the delay about 1 to 3 milliseconds. This will happen everytime a read() or write(int b) occurs so it is enough to slow things down.
This is a code sample that shows the basic idea for reading in a file:
import java.io.*;
public class Example
static class SlowInputStream extends InputStream
private InputStream in;
public SlowInputStream(InputStream i)
in=i;
public int read() throws IOException
try { Thread.sleep(3); }
catch(InterruptedException e) {}
return in.read();
public static void main(String[] args)
throws IOException
if(args.length==0)
System.out.println("Need filename.");
System.exit(0);
SlowInputStream sis=new SlowInputStream(
new FileInputStream(args[0]));
BufferedReader in=new BufferedReader(
new InputStreamReader(sis));
String text;
StringBuffer temp=new StringBuffer();
while((text=in.readLine())!=null)
temp.append(text);
temp.append("\n");
System.out.println(temp.toString());
I would have posted a networking example but I create a subclass of PlainSocketImpl to so I can wrap all the streams networking streams and this requires to set the bootclasspath, but the above shows the basic technique.
Thanks

Delay in broadband activation

I ordered BT broadband on the 24th November I was given the activation date of the 15th December, originally I was supposed to have an engineer out on the 15th however the day enforce this I checked the online status of my order and it said the engineer no longer needed to come out, which didn't surprise me as there is already a BT line in the property I have moved into. I received a text message on the 15th saying there was a delay and they would contact me on the 16th, I then received another text on the 16th saying they would give me an update on the 18th. Heard nothing on the 18th but had a voicemail and a text message on the 19th as I was in work so couldn't answer the phone. In the voicemail and text I was told that there was still a delay and I would e contacted for an update on the 2nd January!! I haven't been informed of what the problem is and in struggling to understand why there is such a problem when there is a by line already in my house. And it seems I'm just being given dates where I will be informed of progress so still no activation date! I understand it's close to Christmas but it's becoming an absolute nuisance as I'm a student needing to revise and still having no internet. Is there anyone who can help to advise what the issue is??

I have asked a moderator to provide assistance, they will post an invite on this thread.
They are the only BT employees on this forum, and are a UK based team of people, who take personal ownership of your problem.
Once you get a reply, make sure that you are logged into the forum, then click on their name, you will see a screen like this. Click on the link as shown below.
Please do not send them a personal message, as they may not be on duty for a long time, and your message will not be tracked properly.
For your own security, do not post any personal details, on this forum. That includes any tracking number you are give.
They will respond either by phone or e-mail within 5-6 working days.
Please use the tracked e-mail, to reply, not via the forum. Thanks
This is the form you should see when you click on the link. If you do not see this form, then you have selected the wrong link.
When you submit the form, you will receive an enquiry number, so please keep a note of it
There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

Suspicious delay of HDD activity after commit

I know that after commit Oracle LGWR process writes the data
changies into the redo-log. And Oracle must return "Commited"
only after above is done. But when I do Commit, I don't see the
HDD LED blink. Only after 1-2 sec HDD LED blinks. Is it normal?
What people have?
null

To answer the question of caching and syncing:
Linux nearly caches all and does it on a high "level", means it
is one of the reason for the good I/O-performance of linux.
In order to make sure that data is directly written to the disks
you can mount your disks with the option sync.
An example: mount -o sync /dev/sdc1 /data_1
Note, that the performance will decrease. The other possibility
is a little tool called syncer, which is a daemon that causes
linux to clear its cache every xy seconds (any value you like). I
think (because I never used) it causes some overhead but is a
good compromise to the sync-option.
Deactivating caching in the kernel... I think this is not the
best solution if you are not familiar with kernel programming.
Also think of swapping and reads on the system-disk and so on.
Dietmar
p.s: I can't remember where I've found it, so I send it to your
personal account, because I can't add any files here
StE (guest) wrote:
: Mark Malakanov (guest) wrote:
: : I know that after commit Oracle LGWR process writes the data
: : changies into the redo-log. And Oracle must return "Commited"
: : only after above is done.
: Not quite true. Information is constantly flushed from the
: in-memory redo log buffer to disc while changes are taking
place
: to the database. When a transaction is committed the
: current contents of the redo-log buffer are flushed to disc,
: followed by a marker saying "SCN was committed" is written to
: disc - the changes themselves have already been written out.
: : But when I do Commit, I don't see the
: : HDD LED blink. Only after 1-2 sec HDD LED blinks.
: : Is it normal? What people have?
: That's probably normal, but that doesn't make it a good thing.
: The Linux buffer-cache does write-behind caching, so that dirty
: buffers arn't written out to disc immediately. If there were a
: failure the write of the commit or some of the preceeding redo
: log blocks might not make it to disc.
: I think you can tune the frequency with which bdflush wakes up
: and writes to disc. Setting it to a low value if you're worried
: about consistency over performance would be a good idea.
: I don't know whether there's an open() flag to perform writes
on
: a file synchronously or not under Linux. It's possible to
sync()
: an open filehandle, I think, so perhaps Oracle does a sync on
: the active redo log when it writes out the commit.
: Anyone know anything less vague and hand-waving?
: -michael
null

FWSM Primary delay returning to active

Hi,
We have several FWSM in 2 6500 chassis and a few days ago the primary FWSM rebooted itself for unknown reasons and the secondary FWSM took over as planned.
But the primary FWSM has, after several days, switched back over to active automatically.
Question is, does anyone know why there would be such a long delay for the primary to request active mode?

Hi,
Thanks for your reply. This is May 27 14:22:41 10.10.0.18 %FWSM-1-104002: May 27 14:22:41 10.10.0.18 %FWSM-1-104001: Here is the failover history from Not Detected Negotiation Negotiation Cold Standby Cold Standby Sync Config Sync Config Sync File System Sync File System Bulk Sync Bulk Sync Standby Ready Standby Ready Just Active Just Active Active Drain Active Drain Active Applying Config Active Applying Config Active Config Applied Active Config Applied Active Active Standby Ready Standby Ready Just Active Just Active Active Drain Active Drain Active Applying Config Active Applying Config Active Config Applied Active Config Applied Active Active Standby Ready Cheers,
- Trevor the log output when the primary decided to take over as active:-
(Secondary) Switching to STNDBY - Other unit want me Standby
(Primary) Switching to ACTIVE - Set by the CI config cmd
the standby unit. It did not reboot like the primary did a few days ago.
No Error
Detected an Active mate
Detected an Active mate
Detected an Active mate
Detected an Active mate
Detected an Active mate
Other unit want me Active
Other unit want me Active
Other unit want me Active
Other unit want me Active
Other unit want me Active
Set by the CI config cmd
HELLO not heard from mate
HELLO not heard from mate
HELLO not heard from mate
HELLO not heard from mate
HELLO not heard from mate
Other unit want me Standby

IPhoto Startup Delay cause by WiFi

Symptom/Observations:
Scenario A: Start iPhoto with WiFi turned on.
iPhoto comes up quickly (can even see the thumbnails), but then immediately hangs (beach ball) for 8-13 seconds.
(sometimes you need to click on a photo to display the beach-ball cursor)
Scenario B: Start iPhoto with WiFi turned off.
iPhoto comes up quickly and is immediately usable (no beach ball).
Scenario C: Start iPhoto with WiFi turned on, when you see iPhoto hang (beach ball), turn WiFi off.
iPhoto comes up quickly but then immediately hangs (beach ball). From previous tests, we can expect it to hang about 8-13 seconds. But this time, within 3-4 second after observing the Beach Ball come up, you quickly turn off the Wifi. The beach ball goes away within about 1 second of turning off the WiFi.
I do not put my photos on iCloud. I double checked to make sure that my iCloud profile is disabled for photos. Therefore, I would not expect any WiFi delay when launching iPhoto.
Apple Marketing: This makes your product appear slow, lumbering, and on the verge of a crash.
Apple Programmers: I didn't change any user settings. Hence, your code is what changed the behavior. Was this intentional?
Apple Production Architects: Was this change in product behavior intentional? Did you write down (e.g. document) the change somewhere, such that the consumer would have some expectation as to what they were getting? (sorry, a tool that once popped up ready for use for 10 years, should not suddenly display 10 seconds of beach ball every time I launch it).
User Community: Yes, I plan on sending in a feedback report to Apple after hearing what other people are experiences and whether or not they've found the cause/solution.

I had the same problem - wifi on, launch iPhoto, events visible, 30 seconds of spinning beachball, then everything works. Wifi off, launch iPhoto, everything works instantly. Tried rebuilding the database, no change.
MacBook Pro Mid 2009 model, clean install of Mountain Lion to erased HD, transferred all user info and applications with migration assistant from backup hard drive during install, iPhoto '09 with ca. 2K pictures in library.
What I finally found was this link http://blog.jonahb.com/?p=502
I had OpenDNS servers 208.67.222.222 and 208.67.220.220) set in my Wifi Settings (System Preferences->Network, choose WiFi, click Advanced button, select DNS tab).
Changed to Google DNS servers (8.8.8.8 ad 8.8.4.4) and the spinning beachball problem went away, iPhoto opens instantly with wifi on.
Been working perfectly all day. So far, so good. Hope this helps.

Delaying Voicemail from activating

Is it possible to delay my iphone(4) from diverting to voicemail so that it rings for longer?

Controlled by your carrier, so contact them about increasing the time before Voicemail kicks in. For most, the maximum is ~ 30 seconds.

Shutdown inactive node cause reboot active node

Hi,
when I try to shutddown a inactive node of Oracle clusterware (two nodes) the active node reboot (s.o Oracle Linux 5.6 and ocfs2).
Fire it acquires vip of second node, then reboot and work correctly.
Anyone can help me?
Have a nice day

user2907588 wrote:
Here the log of active node:
Jan 31 15:35:23 esse3-db1 avahi-daemon[7041]: Registering new address record for 192.168.101.222 on eth0. *> Jan 31 15:56:30 esse3-db1 kernel: bnx2: eth2 NIC Copper Link is Down*
Jan 31 15:56:32 esse3-db1 kernel: bnx2: eth2 NIC Copper Link is Up, 100 Mbps full duplex, receive & transmit flow control ON
Jan 31 15:56:59 esse3-db1 kernel: o2net: connection to node esse3-db2.unisalento.it (num 0) at 192.168.101.202:7777 has been idle for 30.0 seconds, shutting it down.
Jan 31 15:56:59 esse3-db1 kernel: (0,17):o2net_idle_timer:1503 here are some times that might help debug the situation: (tmr 1359644189.432221 now 1359644219.431047 dr 1359644189.432200 adv 1359644189.432221:1359644189.432221 func (1f70fe7a:504) 1359644047.329097:1359644047.329102)
Jan 31 15:56:59 esse3-db1 kernel: o2net: no longer connected to node esse3-db2.unisalento.it (num 0) at 192.168.101.202:7777 *> Jan 31 15:57:29 esse3-db1 kernel: (6377,17):o2net_connect_expired:1664 ERROR: no connection established with node 0 after 30.0 seconds, giving up and returning errors.*
*> Jan 31 16:01:40 esse3-db1 syslogd 1.4.1: restart.*
>
Edited by: user2907588 on 1-feb-2013 7.39Hello,
One of the nodes in cluster seemed to have been evicted previously due to eth2 NIC outage between nodes so as removing the failed node(could be what u r referring to "INACTIVE")
Please check I have highlighted in provided log information... Check If you are able to ping to the specified IP, and do password-less ssh to other node (101), and ask your system/network administrator to look into it...
Regards,
Naga

Android - long frame delay causing wierd screen redraw

I am building a game for android devices using Air 3.5 and Flash Builder 4.6
Some of my game sections have quite a bit of loading to do, so broke them up on a time to only load a little bit at a time, thus allowing enter frames and timers to fire between each chunk... and I put a spinning tumbler on the screen as a wait indicator.
however, some of the chunks still take a bit of time to execute (usually when processing large images and such) and can take several hundered milliseconds to execute.
Now, this is not the problem.
The problem is that on these frames that take longer than 33 milliseconds (fps is set to 30) the spinner on screen seems to "jump" backwards for a partial frame.
It's almost like the when the current enterframe runs, there are 2 screen updates occuring... the first update shows the screen contents as they were before the screen started to redraw, and the second updates the screen to what it should be now.... the result is that for that partial frame update, the spinner seems to "jump back" a couple of frames.
This does not occur on the iOS devices or the pc, only android.
Anyone know what could be causing this and how I could stop it from occuring?

Found out what the problem was.
When I was drawing text as an image, I would convert the stage quality to best, do the drawing and convert it back to low.
Since was old code left over from a while ago. I have since altered this code to use drawWithQuality instead and took out the stage.quality changes and the problem has gone away.

Out of memory with no swap causes disk activity

Can someone explain what exactly is being read/written from/to disk in this situation?
I have 2 GB of RAM and no swap partitions. Occasionally I'll forget how inefficient gwenview is at displaying very large images and accidentally double-click one. The entire system freezes; even alt+sysrq keystrokes are ineffective (and yes I do have them enabled).
For about 5 minutes, the system is locked up and the hard drive light is flickering. That scares me a bit, because with no swap, what could it possibly be doing for 5 straight minutes? I used to think it was synching before doing the OOM-killing, but there's no way a sync could take that long. Judging from the sound of the hard drive, it's hda (the drive / and all the other system partitions are on).
A few times after recovering from this I've run extensive data verification and never found any evidence of corruption, but I'd like to know for sure that the kernel isn't randomly deciding to use some filesystem as swap space.
In the mean time, I'm playing with disabling overcommit -- setting vm.overcommit_memory = 2 in /etc/sysctl.conf. That enforces a hard memory commit limit of swap size + overcommit_ratio * ram size (so I've read) -- and I've also read that the default overcommit_ratio is only 50%. What the bloody hell? It's almost like someone thinks swap is more important than RAM -- hell-llo, I have 2 GB of RAM so that I can get *away* from swap!
Anyway, I've set the ratio to 97% and so far things seem happy -- if I deliberately run out of memory, the process that did it always gets killed instantly and the system doesn't freeze up on OOM anymore."
Another thing -- in all my out of memory situations so far, VMWare has been running. I suppose it's possible that VMWare is the one doing the swappage; I'll have to investigate that further.
~Felix.

I think I've finally figured this out. It's a kernel bug -- I'm guessing that under normal circumstances, the "cached" column in the free command "doesn't count" towards how much memory the system thinks it's using. After all, it's just cached copies of stuff that should be elsewhere, and if you run out of memory, you can safely dump that, right? Unfortunately, /dev/shm is counted under cached rather than used memory (as I discovered in an earlier post).
So if I've got 500 MB of stuff in /dev/shm * (which is where I mount my /tmp), there's now 500MB of stuff in the "cached" column that really does count -- system reaches all RAM full, decides it needs to dump cache, and suddenly finds that the 500MB it thought it could use isn't usable. For some reason it takes about 5 minutes of hard drive thrashing (probably because it's already chucked all of the system libraries, etc. out of cached and needs to re-read them from disk every time) before something finally figures out that it really is out of memory and that that 500MB isn't letting go and invokes OOM-killer.
*: VMWare does this; it creates a 512MB file (the amount of RAM in my virtual machine) then hides it by keeping the file open and deleting it, so the inode's still there, but you can't see it and it makes the df command really perplexing... but that's another story.
I haven't had a chance to try this with a newer kernel (maybe they've fixed it now?); I'm still running 2.6.23-ARCH here. (pacman -Syu upgrades are a major production for me because I have lots of RAID arrays and things, and an nvidia graphics card, and I use gnucash which sometimes needs manual recompiling, and so on...)

How to reduce delay caused by coding?

Hi,
I am fairly new to C++ programming and using DAQ boards. I've been browsing this board for awhile and let me first thank everyone who has contributed - most threads were very helpful.
However this problem I have right now didn't come up in any searches so hopefully someone could help me out.
I am using the NI-6115 PCI DAQ board and I am trying to write a simple C program that continuously counts the number of input pulses to a counter within a time period. The program also has to continuously output the result onto the screen.
So basically this is what my code looks like:
while( 1 ) {
       DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxReadCounterScalarU32(taskHandle,10.0,&data,NULL));
       count = data - data1;
       if ((long)count < 0)
           (uInt32)count = data + 16777216 - data1;
       data1 = data;
       printf("\rCount: %d. Press Ctrl+C to interrupt.            ",count);
       fflush(stdout);
       DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxWaitForNextSampleClock(taskHandleCtr,10.0,0));
The sample clock uses another counter's output pulse train as the source.
The problem is, the desired execution time of each iteration is around 40 - 50 microseconds. With the above coding, I could only achieve 800 microseconds per iteration. If I set the sample clock any faster, an error will occur telling me that two sample clock pulses have occured before the "DAQmxWaitForNextSampleClock" instruction is reached.
Would it be the computer that I am running the program on? The speed of the DAQ board? Or just poor programming technique on my part?
Thanks in advance
Howard
Message Edited by HT156 on 05-14-2009 06:17 PM
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Thanks for you last reply David.
Since switching to a new OS is not an option for me, I have decided to reconsider my program logic in order to achieve an even faster time.
I have decided to store the read counter values first then do the calculations later. Also, I have omitted the part of continuously printing the results onto the screen. Here's what remains of my code, which is incomplete.
while( 1 ) {
       DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxReadCounterScalarU32(taskHandle,10.0,&data,NULL));
       DAQmxErrChk (DAQmxWaitForNextSampleClock(taskHandleCtr,10.0,0));
However even with those two lines of codes I am only able to get down to 350 microseconds per iteration before WaitForNextSampleClock returns an error. I was wondering if there is a faster read function to read the counter value than DAQmxReadCounterScalarU32? And is there a way to bypass the CPU and store the counter values direct onto the DAQboard?

Running Audition 3.0 on Win7, alternating between BootCamp on Mac and Parallels cause re-activation

Can anyone or Adobe themselves give an explanation as to how Audition 3.0 (and perhaps Audition CS5.5) verifies the machine hardware that it is running on to ensure that the purchased software license is not being installed on multiple machines?
I ask because it would appear that Audition 3.0 (at least) views its installation on the same single Windows 7 image as being 2 separate PCs if the same Windows 7 is booted into parallels and then at others times into BootCamp.
Yes, yes I know I can get Audition CS5.5 natively for the Mac, but for now I wish to run Audition in Windows. So please avoid discussions on this and instead offer me some advice as to why/how Audition reads the hardware it is running on.
The problem:
- I boot into BootCamp Windows, Audition 3.0 runs OK.
- Boot into MacOS, run same BootCamp VM Windows from parallels, run Audition 3.0, it runs asking for registratation. Registration succeeds.
- Boot into BootCamp Windows, Audition 3.0 runs runs asking for registratation. Registration succeeds.
And so on...
If I stick with one mode of running Windows, i.e. BootCamp OR via Parallels, Audition doesn't ask again, however, switching between the two triggers the re-registration.
Using the same VM/Windows install image/drive.
But I guess what is happening here is that the (virtual) "hardware" profile/signature/id presented to Windows/and 3rd-party applications, is different in BootCamp and Parallels and that applications such as Audition use this for authentication/registration to prove that the license is only running on the same hardware.
An ideal solution is that Parallels complies with the same hardware profile that BootCamp presents to Windows and 3rd party applications so that both Parallels and BootCamp are wholly seen as the same machine.
I've raised a support ticket with Parallels themselves.
I've posted on Parallels forum thread: http://forum.parallels.com/showthread.php?t=103398
awaiting moderation
But I also think Adobe could be a bit smarter as to how they detect that their software is running on the same machine that it is licensed for.

Arjaydavis wrote:
Can anyone or Adobe themselves give an explanation as to how Audition 3.0 (and perhaps Audition CS5.5) verifies the machine hardware that it is running on to ensure that the purchased software license is not being installed on multiple machines?
I think it's very, very unlikely that you'll get an answer to this. Simply because to answer it is an out-and-out invitation to hackers. All I can tell you is that each copy of Audition will allow two installations, but only on different hardware, and that you aren't strictly allowed to use them concurrently. The intention is that you can have one install on a desktop, and another on a laptop. Any conjecture that you might make about this may or may not be true - even if you guess correctly though, I doubt whether you could easily do anything about it. The only thing that Adobe are going to do is to offer to sell you another seat, I guess - that way you could have three installs. But requests for further information are almost certainly going to fall on deaf ears.

Tooltip delay causes tooltip to remain after focus left item

Hi,
We are migrating from Forms 10g to Forms 11.1.2.0.0 and have an issue with tooltips.
If the mouse cursor happens to move quickly across an item that has tooltip text, the tooltip can appear after the cursor has left the item. Since the cursor is no longer over the item, the tooltip text remains on screen unless you either move the cursor back to that item and away from it again, or hover over another item with tooltip text. This issue did not occur in the previous 10g version of our forms.
Any help appreciated.
Nick.

This is/was a known issue and has been corrected. Also, just an fyi, the issue reproduced in all versions starting with 10.1.2.3. Fixes are available as follows:
<blockquote>Forms 11.1.2.0 - use Patch ID 14037368
Forms 11.1.1.4 - use Patch ID 14058674
Forms 10.1.2.3 - use Patch ID 14041415 (some platforms may not be available yet) This also requires that Bundle Patch 9593176 be installed first - be sure to read included Readme as other prerequisite patches may be required. </blockquote>

Compensation of delay caused by activity

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for