Compliance rates drop from 80% to less than 1%
This has happened more than once. We have compliance rates slowly creeping up, get to around 80%, and then suddenly drop to 1% or less with 1,800 clients unknown, a few successful, and a few in progress. I don't even know where to begin troubleshooting
such an issue.
Several deployments are still showing the correct numbers, so this isn't all of them. Can anyone tell me where to begin with troubleshooting this issue?
Are you sure?, that the revision of the configuration baselines or configuration item has not changed by recent edit.
Kindly mark as answer/Vote as helpful if a reply from anybody helped you in this forum. Delphin
Similar Messages
-
Broadband speed drops from 4mb to less than 0.5mb ...
Hello forum readers,
I am having speed problems since early December where during the day time my download speed is 4mb. However, after 7:30pm the speed then drops very quickly to below 0.5mb. I did a speed test just now and it is:
Download speedachieved during the test was - 268 Kbps
For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 600-7150 Kbps.
Additional Information:
Your DSL Connection Rate :5344 Kbps(DOWN-STREAM), 448 Kbps(UP-STREAM)
IP Profile for your line is - 4500 Kbps
I have tried calling India technical support, all I got was "we are looking into the problem" over the weeks. Very frustrating as it is so difficult to understand them. They keep giving me excuses as to the causes. Today I am told there is a problem with the exchange. I asked when can this be fixed by, the response was they are not going to fix it as the equipment is very expensive to replace.
I am so frustrate by all their so uncaring attitude that I have obtained a MAC code tonight. Will a different provider be any different if the problem is with the exchange?
Has any forum readers experience this speed dropping problem? I can understand if the speed drops due to higher demands in the evening, but with this slow speed it is impossible to use the internet for anything meaningful as a web page took over 40 seconds to load.
I am on the unlimited Option 3, and my exchange is Poplar, London.
Is there a BT moderator on this forum who can help me resolve this speed problem please?
Thanks.Hello peeps,
An update on my slow down boardband connection...
I have reported the problem to "No Help Indian Technical Support" since 11 December, still no resolution!
I was told to wait until the end of February as work on the exchange may take place to increase capacity. Nobody called to update me on what is happening since my last post. Called Indian support for an update (17 March) only to be told my case was closed and problem resolved on the 28 February!
Then I asked to speak to a supervisor and the guy literally cut me off. All I wanted to ask was why they think the problem was resolved when I am still getting the same slow down every evening. I tried calling them again, but useless idiots who would make you answer their scripts again, but still they can't give me an update or what are they going to do about the problem.
I am at a loss in how to obtain an update from them. I am sure many of you who have the experience of calling Indian will end up with frustrations. They will try their best to ignore you especially with questions they have not a clue in answering. Every time they say they will call back, but no they don't.
Why is BT technical support be handled by such non-technical idiots? The minute they have ran of scripts to follow then you are speaking to a blank wall.
Anyone here know of a complaint number I can call or email?
Thanks. -
I bought Pavilion dm4-1000au with Win7 Starter as original OS. My target is to get full Sample rate of Audio 192 K when I ran Sofware Defined Radio like Softrock SDR. Actualy I only get less than 100% of sample rate. So, frequency coverage of SDR become less than I prefered 192 KHz.
What I have done is up dating Audio driver from HP Support/ Driver Download center only.
How to solve this problem ?.Thank you for your input.
YES - I've seen the "right click Time Code display and switch to audio units timeline solution - yet audio units do NOT appear as an option for me...hence all of this drama.
ADOBE - do I have a munged install? Any other advice? We keep a clean system (Mac Pro 10.6.11 or whatever is last iteration of SL). I guess I could try installing into a new User and see if it behaves any differently.
Sigh...we bailed on FCP7 after trying FCPX and also passed on going to Avid MC. Hope PP is reliable for our work flow...again thx for all help.
PCG -
I'm just tired of waiting on this inept device and it's underserved iTunes counterpart being unable to deliver enough bandwidth to load a show within a reasonable amount of time. I'm a big Apple fan and an equally big critic. This whole rig is a big FAIL so far, Apple. There is nothing ON DEMAND about the iTunes Store at this point. Netflix and YouTube work better on Apple TV than their own iTunes Store! And, this has been going on for a few years now, unremedied, and is only getting worse with more people buying these devices! I do not reccommend this device to people like I used to.
The good news is, that iTunes will give refunds about 85% of the time if I explain my problem the way I have here. SO, ATTENTION: EVERYONE WITH AN APPLE TV: If you have this same issue with iTunes Store not properly serving your paid content, do not hesitate to ask for your money back. It's the least they can do for the amount of life wasted waiting for a show to load. Not to mention, all the disappointments with the kids at bedtime and when my wife and I want to just relax and turn something on.
Bottom Line: ITUNES IS UNDER-SERVED!!!
OR
There is a massive conspiracy by cable and DSL ISPs against Apple taking away TV viewers. Is it possible the ISPs are somehow limiting or buffering the data packets coming through the port(s) employed by iTunes Store? Like I say, with me and many others on this forum, the problem lies solely with iTunes Store. Youtube, Netflix, Podcasts and everything else generally serve up just fine. The iTunes Store, however, is a consistent failure. Something that seems unusual for Apple not to address, being so customer-centric and all.
Please share any links or insights you have here so the faithful might get to the bottom of this incredibly annoying problem. I WANT MY ATV!There is a massive conspiracy by cable and DSL ISPs against Apple taking away TV viewers.
Most networks are overloaded and operating at full capacity. However, a solution is coming.
Technology experts are working on a movie storage system where YOU have physical possession of the movie.
This system stores the movie digitally on an optical disk system that will not be dependent upon a congested, complicated, and fragile network.
Because all of the data is stored only a few feet from your television, all the bottlenecks are removed. Performance and reliability are virtually flawless.
Further, the system will not utilize any form of security codes, authentications, or passwords. Once the optical disc is purchased it can be moved around freely at will, and can even be lent or given to friends and neighbors with zero hassles. -
CS4 install not accepting uninstall from old device - less than 20 installs
Any thoughts?
I have new computer, want to move the cs4 I have on this
computer to the new one. However, instead of deactivating the program on the
old computer, it was uninstalled. my question is there anyway to deactivate it now, ( the old computer is badly
compromised and will not allow me to system restore.)
Skip Jones
MediaLeaseOOH
<Removed by Moderator>
THIS MESSAGE AND ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTS ARE COVERED BY THE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS PRIVACY ACT, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2521, AS AMENDED, AND CONTAINS INFORMATION INTENDED FOR THE SPECIFIED INDIVIDUAL(S) ONLY. THIS INFORMATION IS CONFIDENTIAL. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT OR AN AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DELIVERING IT TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS DOCUMENT IN ERROR AND THAT ANY REVIEW, DISSEMINATION, COPYING, OR THE TAKING OF ANY ACTION BASED ON THE CONTENTS OF THIS INFORMATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU HAVE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US IMMEDIATELY BY E-MAIL, AND DELETE THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE. IN AN EFFORT TO PROTECT PRIVATE CONSUMER INFORMATION AND TO MAINTAIN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH THE HEALTH INSURANCE PORTABILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT (HIPAA), P.L.104-191, AS AMENDED AND THE GRAMM-LEACH-BLILEY ACT (GLBA), P.L.106-102, MEDIALEASE DOES NOT SEND AND ENCOURAGES OTHERS NOT TO
SEND NONPUBLIC PERSONAL INFORMATION (NPI) OR PERSONAL HEALTH INFORMATION (PHI) VIA UNSECURED E-MAIL. -
I have new purchased T410 during christmas time.
here is my machine spec(everything from Levono, did not upgrade any parts):
T410, model 2516CTO
8 GB RAM
i7 CPU
500GB HDD
Integried graphic card
Windows 7 professional (applied all latest updates)
Problem random happen, for about 8 times,
System works regularly
and all of sudden machine make continousely "beep" sound(from machine, not speaker),
after that screen freeze,
and then sometime system go back to normal, sometime crash completely to blue screen(most time).
The whole problem takes about 3-5 mins.
1 time it even happen in safe mode (after log in, desktop freezed immediately, then blue screen).
I chkdsk the whole disk found no problem.
I call Lenovo tech support, he ask me restore the original OS(Windows 7 home prim), then he can help me.
I refused because that's mean i have to destroy all the work I done (spend almost a week to install development tools and software) .
Since the problem is random anyway, I just reboot and bakeup more offen. :-(
I used Thinkpad since IBM time, never have problem with previous 2 T Series machines, but this one, not happy.Microsoft (R) Windows Debugger Version 6.11.0001.404 AMD64
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Loading Dump File [C:\FreezeIssue\Minidump\010111-51090-01.dmp]
Mini Kernel Dump File: Only registers and stack trace are available
WARNING: Whitespace at start of path element
Symbol search path is: SRV*C:\Symbols*http://msdl.microsoft.com/download/symbols;
Executable search path is:
Windows 7 Kernel Version 7600 MP (4 procs) Free x64
Product: WinNt, suite: TerminalServer SingleUserTS
Built by: 7600.16617.amd64fre.win7_gdr.100618-1621
Machine Name:
Kernel base = 0xfffff800`02c18000 PsLoadedModuleList = 0xfffff800`02e55e50
Debug session time: Sat Jan 1 14:53:03.162 2011 (GMT-5)
System Uptime: 0 days 0:29:01.004
Loading Kernel Symbols
Loading User Symbols
Loading unloaded module list
* Bugcheck Analysis *
Use !analyze -v to get detailed debugging information.
BugCheck F4, {3, fffffa8008159060, fffffa8008159340, fffff80002f935d0}
Probably caused by : csrss.exe
Followup: MachineOwner
2: kd> !analyze -v
* Bugcheck Analysis *
CRITICAL_OBJECT_TERMINATION (f4)
A process or thread crucial to system operation has unexpectedly exited or been
terminated.
Several processes and threads are necessary for the operation of the
system; when they are terminated (for any reason), the system can no
longer function.
Arguments:
Arg1: 0000000000000003, Process
Arg2: fffffa8008159060, Terminating object
Arg3: fffffa8008159340, Process image file name
Arg4: fffff80002f935d0, Explanatory message (ascii)
Debugging Details:
PROCESS_OBJECT: fffffa8008159060
IMAGE_NAME: csrss.exe
DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 0
MODULE_NAME: csrss
FAULTING_MODULE: 0000000000000000
PROCESS_NAME: csrss.exe
EXCEPTION_RECORD: fffff8800a977b78 -- (.exr 0xfffff8800a977b78)
ExceptionAddress: 0000000077a8592d
ExceptionCode: c0000005 (Access violation)
ExceptionFlags: 00000000
NumberParameters: 2
Parameter[0]: 0000000000000001
Parameter[1]: 0000000002ea0ef8
Attempt to write to address 0000000002ea0ef8
EXCEPTION_CODE: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000005 - The instruction at 0x%08lx referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s.
CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT: 1
DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: VISTA_DRIVER_FAULT
CURRENT_IRQL: 0
ERROR_CODE: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000005 - The instruction at 0x%08lx referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s.
EXCEPTION_PARAMETER1: 0000000000000001
EXCEPTION_PARAMETER2: 0000000002ea0ef8
WRITE_ADDRESS: 0000000002ea0ef8
FOLLOWUP_IP:
+0
00000000`77a8592d ?? ???
FAULTING_IP:
+0
00000000`77a8592d ?? ???
FAILED_INSTRUCTION_ADDRESS:
+0
00000000`77a8592d ?? ???
BUGCHECK_STR: 0xF4_C0000005
STACK_TEXT:
fffff880`0a9770f8 fffff800`03014652 : 00000000`000000f4 00000000`00000003 fffffa80`08159060 fffffa80`08159340 : nt!KeBugCheckEx
fffff880`0a977100 fffff800`02fbd3e3 : ffffffff`ffffffff fffffa80`0ab4f060 fffffa80`08159060 fffffa80`08159060 : nt!PspCatchCriticalBreak+0x92
fffff880`0a977140 fffff800`02f4580c : ffffffff`ffffffff 00000000`00000001 fffffa80`08159060 fffff6fb`00000008 : nt! ?? ::NNGAKEGL::`string'+0x17946
fffff880`0a977190 fffff800`02c87993 : fffffa80`08159060 fffff800`c0000005 ffffcbdb`afa4f658 fffffa80`0ab4f060 : nt!NtTerminateProcess+0x20c
fffff880`0a977210 fffff800`02c83f30 : fffff800`02cc2dbc fffff880`0a977b78 fffff880`0a9778e0 fffff880`0a977c20 : nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
fffff880`0a9773a8 fffff800`02cc2dbc : fffff880`0a977b78 fffff880`0a9778e0 fffff880`0a977c20 00000000`02ea2180 : nt!KiServiceLinkage
fffff880`0a9773b0 fffff800`02c87d82 : fffff880`0a977b78 00000000`000116e4 fffff880`0a977c20 00000000`02ea1c58 : nt!KiDispatchException+0x53b
fffff880`0a977a40 fffff800`02c868fa : 00000000`00000001 00000000`000116e4 fffffa80`079c2201 00000000`77a85a01 : nt!KiExceptionDispatch+0xc2
fffff880`0a977c20 00000000`77a8592d : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!KiPageFault+0x23a
00000000`02ea0f00 00000000`00000000 : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : 0x77a8592d
STACK_COMMAND: kb
FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwner
FAILURE_BUCKET_ID: X64_0xF4_C0000005_IMAGE_csrss.exe
BUCKET_ID: X64_0xF4_C0000005_IMAGE_csrss.exe
Followup: MachineOwner
2: kd> !analyze -v
* Bugcheck Analysis *
CRITICAL_OBJECT_TERMINATION (f4)
A process or thread crucial to system operation has unexpectedly exited or been
terminated.
Several processes and threads are necessary for the operation of the
system; when they are terminated (for any reason), the system can no
longer function.
Arguments:
Arg1: 0000000000000003, Process
Arg2: fffffa8008159060, Terminating object
Arg3: fffffa8008159340, Process image file name
Arg4: fffff80002f935d0, Explanatory message (ascii)
Debugging Details:
PROCESS_OBJECT: fffffa8008159060
IMAGE_NAME: csrss.exe
DEBUG_FLR_IMAGE_TIMESTAMP: 0
MODULE_NAME: csrss
FAULTING_MODULE: 0000000000000000
PROCESS_NAME: csrss.exe
EXCEPTION_RECORD: fffff8800a977b78 -- (.exr 0xfffff8800a977b78)
ExceptionAddress: 0000000077a8592d
ExceptionCode: c0000005 (Access violation)
ExceptionFlags: 00000000
NumberParameters: 2
Parameter[0]: 0000000000000001
Parameter[1]: 0000000002ea0ef8
Attempt to write to address 0000000002ea0ef8
EXCEPTION_CODE: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000005 - The instruction at 0x%08lx referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s.
CUSTOMER_CRASH_COUNT: 1
DEFAULT_BUCKET_ID: VISTA_DRIVER_FAULT
CURRENT_IRQL: 0
ERROR_CODE: (NTSTATUS) 0xc0000005 - The instruction at 0x%08lx referenced memory at 0x%08lx. The memory could not be %s.
EXCEPTION_PARAMETER1: 0000000000000001
EXCEPTION_PARAMETER2: 0000000002ea0ef8
WRITE_ADDRESS: 0000000002ea0ef8
FOLLOWUP_IP:
+0
00000000`77a8592d ?? ???
FAULTING_IP:
+0
00000000`77a8592d ?? ???
FAILED_INSTRUCTION_ADDRESS:
+0
00000000`77a8592d ?? ???
BUGCHECK_STR: 0xF4_C0000005
STACK_TEXT:
fffff880`0a9770f8 fffff800`03014652 : 00000000`000000f4 00000000`00000003 fffffa80`08159060 fffffa80`08159340 : nt!KeBugCheckEx
fffff880`0a977100 fffff800`02fbd3e3 : ffffffff`ffffffff fffffa80`0ab4f060 fffffa80`08159060 fffffa80`08159060 : nt!PspCatchCriticalBreak+0x92
fffff880`0a977140 fffff800`02f4580c : ffffffff`ffffffff 00000000`00000001 fffffa80`08159060 fffff6fb`00000008 : nt! ?? ::NNGAKEGL::`string'+0x17946
fffff880`0a977190 fffff800`02c87993 : fffffa80`08159060 fffff800`c0000005 ffffcbdb`afa4f658 fffffa80`0ab4f060 : nt!NtTerminateProcess+0x20c
fffff880`0a977210 fffff800`02c83f30 : fffff800`02cc2dbc fffff880`0a977b78 fffff880`0a9778e0 fffff880`0a977c20 : nt!KiSystemServiceCopyEnd+0x13
fffff880`0a9773a8 fffff800`02cc2dbc : fffff880`0a977b78 fffff880`0a9778e0 fffff880`0a977c20 00000000`02ea2180 : nt!KiServiceLinkage
fffff880`0a9773b0 fffff800`02c87d82 : fffff880`0a977b78 00000000`000116e4 fffff880`0a977c20 00000000`02ea1c58 : nt!KiDispatchException+0x53b
fffff880`0a977a40 fffff800`02c868fa : 00000000`00000001 00000000`000116e4 fffffa80`079c2201 00000000`77a85a01 : nt!KiExceptionDispatch+0xc2
fffff880`0a977c20 00000000`77a8592d : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : nt!KiPageFault+0x23a
00000000`02ea0f00 00000000`00000000 : 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 00000000`00000000 : 0x77a8592d
STACK_COMMAND: kb
FOLLOWUP_NAME: MachineOwner
FAILURE_BUCKET_ID: X64_0xF4_C0000005_IMAGE_csrss.exe
BUCKET_ID: X64_0xF4_C0000005_IMAGE_csrss.exe
Followup: MachineOwner -
I have two transient attributes in a vo
From serial no and To serial no
My condition is from serial no should not be greater than to To serial no
In vo validation i have used compare operator and given from serial no less than or equal to To serial no and given a failure message
If my Fromserialno is greater than To serial no error msg fires
But when i go back and change the from serial no so that it is less than or equal to To serial no
Still my error msg firesThis VO is not based on a EO
Its a VO in which i have added all transient attributes
While creating VO .. the third option which is rows populated programatically, not based on query .. i have chosen that option
After the VO is created with attributes double click on any attribute you will find validation
There by click new you can add your validation just like you do at EO level
https://picasaweb.google.com/107879419245098414715/Jun202011?authkey=Gv1sRgCIvlw5LFxrmF0QE#5620272157254971970 -
after firefox updated from 27 to 28, when i download a file, play music, watch a video, or run a speed test, normal speed is about 160 kb/s (dsl connection 1.3 Mb/s) - just opening another blank tab (not any address) or try to open another page like google search page, download speed drops to less than 5 kb/s - downloading stops, and second page does not open, why is this happening, it does not happen with internet explorer and the version of IE i have is out of date,
history/cookies all clear automatically when close, i have disabled all add on, run malware, adware searches - show no problem, norton antivirus is up to date, i have spent hours on phone with ATT isp and connection is showing no problem - if i run a speed test it shows good, if i try to run a speed test and open second tab - speed fails and speed test will not even finish, ATT suggested I try the same thing in IE and there is no problem - so it appears to be an issue with Firefox 28What is the CPU load when this slowdown happens?
Are you using a specific driver in Windows to mange the internet connection that might not get enough processor time to run properly?
It is also possible that other (security) isn't able to do its work and takes additional CPU time.
Boot the computer in Windows Safe Mode with network support (press F8 on the boot screen) as a test to see if that helps.
*http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/tutorials/how-to-start-windows-in-safe-mode/
You can try to create a new profile as a test to check if your current profile is causing the problem if starting Firefox in Safe Mode didn't help.
See "Creating a profile":
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/profile-manager-create-and-remove-firefox-profiles
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Standard_diagnostic_-_Firefox#Profile_issues
If the new profile works then you can transfer files from a previously used profile to the new profile, but be cautious not to copy corrupted files to avoid carrying over the problem
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Transferring_data_to_a_new_profile_-_Firefox -
Sales of my books averaged over 270 per month for almost all of 2011 and 2012 and for January of 2013--then in February of 2013 and continuing to the present, sales dropped to less than 70 per month.
The sudden drop from over 270 per month to less than 70 per month with sales suddenly falling off the fiscal cliff in Februrary of 2013 is inexplicable. I can find no reason for it.
Therefore, I am asking other authors: Has this happened to you? Any idea of what changed? I presume something must have changed within the itunes bookstore, or there was a change in the listing of my books.In additon to this forum, we contacted Apple Ibookstore support and this afternoon they may have provided the explantion:
According to Apple:
"iBookstore that change frequently including top charts and any featured placement sections (IE: New and Noteworthy sand other special or seasonal sections). All featured placement is solely at the discretion of Apple and isn't guaranteed. If your book was in one of these prominent sections or top charts before and is no longer there, this might be what you are noticing in your numbers."
Fortunately for us, our authors probably got us featured placement for 2 years. Unfortunately for us, after 2 years it appears we were shoved aside for another pretty face. Thus, book sales imploded.
We thank Apple for answering our inquiries and providing us with useful information as to how to (hopefully) drive sales back up. -
Broadband speed dropped from 2 meg to less than di...
Hi everyone this is my first post, I am looking for some help / advice with an ongoing speed issue I have just joined BT broadband, my equipment setup is a D-Link 320 modem set in bridge mode to a cisco/Linksys E4200 router as they suit my need I only use the internet for surfing maybe the odd song / app from itunes plus online gaming through XBox live, when I first set everything up on 1/7/2011 I was getting a healthy 2,5 meg the max that my line is capable of getting, I did a another BT speed test on 3/7/2011 results below as you can see things have gone very wrong and I am getting less than dial up speed very frustrating.
Download speedachieved during the test was - 420 Kbps
For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 50-500 Kbps.
Additional Information:
Your DSL Connection Rate :608 Kbps(DOWN-STREAM), 448 Kbps(UP-STREAM)
IP Profile for your line is - 500 Kbps
9/7/2011 I did another speed test today at 13:00 hour results below
Download speedachieved during the test was - 410 Kbps
For your connection, the acceptable range of speeds is 50-500 Kbps.
Additional Information:
Your DSL Connection Rate :608 Kbps(DOWN-STREAM), 448 Kbps(UP-STREAM)
IP Profile for your line is - 500 Kbps
It has been 9 days now my equipment has been left on 24/7 but as you can see nothing has changed I know about the 10 day training period for things to settle down etc but surely I should have seen some improved by now i.e. my ip profile increasing a little
As I pulled 2,5 meg when I first set everything up does that mean my line is ok and should of stabilised by now or has my line been capped for some unknown reason
any help or advice is appreciated
many thanks
Solved!
Go to Solution.hi yea Iv just a quiet line test and everything seems fine no noise.
I forgot to explain my equipment is connected upstairs using an ADSL approved extension cable that I bought from the BT shop as well as an I,plate, but I had the same issue with my last provider and I connected direct to the BT socket downstairs and I have been having the same issue this is why I changed to BT. Hear are the router states from last provider these were taken on 17/6/2011
ADSLValues
DescriptionThomson Livebox 2 Mini uk v7.1-h323
ManufacturerThomson
SerialNumber0812GH0WD3678CP
HardwareVersionT-E.1.0
SoftwareVersion6.3.9.6
DestinationAddressPVC: 0/38
ModulationTypeADSL_G.dmt
ATMEncapsulationVCMUX
ModemFirmwareVersionbcm96358_ADSL_PHY_A2pBT009c1.d17d
StatusUp
LinkStatusUp
LinkType PPPoA
DataPathInterleave
UpstreamAttenuation275
DownstreamAttenuation500
UpstreamNoiseMargin190
DownstreamNoiseMargin79
UpstreamMaxRate1040000
DownstreamMaxRate736
UpstreamCurrRate448
DownstreamCurrRate608
UpstreamPower121
DownstreamPower148
UpTime902134
Stats.Total.Values
LinkRetrain3
FECErrors187816
ATUCFECErrors0
HECErrors61
ATUCHECErrors0
CRCErrors163
ATUCCRCErrors0 -
Problems with the Fios 20/5 connection speed in my area dropping down to less than 3mbs.
I have written out a flyer that I plan to go door to door with. Since I am under contract with Verizon, I am forced to honor my side of the contract. Even if they are allowed to make me pay for a service that I am not completely getting. I am very displeased and as soon as my contract is up, I will change back to My local cable companies all in one that does not require a contract and has no issue such as the one I am having.
Do you have Verizon Fios Internet?
Are you on the 20/5 connection?
If so, you may not be getting the speed you are paying for. I am on a 20/5 connection and when my computer is on for longer than an hour the internet download speed with Verizon Fios starts to slow down until it is below 3mbs. It takes about 24 hours to get down to 3mbs but only about an hour or two to get down to about 6-7mbs when I am paying for 20mbs…
I have 3 computers in my home that have Windows Vista, Windows XP home edition and Windows Media Edition 2005. All of the computers run into this same exact issue, I have tried every setting I could think of with my 24 years of computer technical experience. I finally took one machine with Windows XP and ran a full format on the hard drive and reinstalled a fresh Windows Xp Operating system onto the hard drive so it is a bare bones OS. This way there is no other software on the machine that could possibly be causing the problem and found that when I connected online through Verizon Fios the machine still ran into the same exact issue. This proves to me that the issue is not on any of my machines.
Now all of this time my buddy that lives 1.2 miles away from my house has been having the same issue with three computers at his home also. He has Windows Vista on two machines and Windows XP Pro on one.
When I concluded that it was a Verizon Fios issue, after a few months of trying to get by, researching, diagnosing and losing much information in order to verify it was on Verizon’s side, I contacted technical support at Verizon’s online website. The agent and I went through the regular procedure that anyone would have to go through and I patiently explained what I had done to try to diagnose the issue. The agent came to the conclusion that he could not figure out the problem so he guessed that the Verizon router/modem may be the issue and told me he would send me a new one by mail.
I received the new Verizon router/modem, installed it and had to call to have it activated. Afterward it still had the same exact issue as the prior router/modem. So now we know it’s not my computers, it’s not the router/modem. My Verizon router/modem is connected right at the Optical Network Terminal (ONT), which is the box that connects the fiber-optics to your home, usually just inside or outside your garage wall. Mine is just outside…
From here my buddy, who has been having this problem also the entire time, called the local office of Verizon Fios and an installer was setup to come over to his home and trouble shoot the issue. My buddy called me and told me when the installer was headed to his home and I met him at his home to see what the installer found and in hope that my issue would be fixed at the same time. The installer went through the system at his house and was frustrated about not finding the reason for the issue and ready to leave without fixing anything. I simply asked that he stay long enough to see the issue present itself within an hour-hour and a half.
His laptop itself already showed the speed drop from 20mbs to between 16-17mbs, it was on its way down. He basically told us something that online tech support already stated to me, it is extremely difficult to prove it is on Verizon’s side. In other words it is extremely difficult to prove it, in a way that will convince Verizon to check its own servers, routers and software updates to their own systems. The installer, good guy, couldn’t/wouldn’t stay but we did convince him not to simply drop the issue. He called shop and they sent another installer out to take over the issue.
The new installer, great guy, got up to speed on what was already done at my buddies home. The first installer, checked and replaced the Verizon router/modem, checked the wiring and splitters. Basically went through the entire system up to the Optical Network Terminal (ONT), the box that connects the fiber-optics to your home. He pulled and replaced the Optical Network Terminal (ONT), thinking that perhaps the unit was compromised. While he was doing this job a tech was called and asked to stop by for assistance with the issue. The tech checked the computers inside and tried to do some settings that the main office informed him to try. I explained to the tech that the same issue was happening at my house, that I went through every setting I could think of and find online to help alleviate the issue. After some shop talk about what I had tried, including the full format and reinstall of the operating system on one of my machines, he just as I came to the conclusion that it couldn’t be with the computers and since everything that had to do with the Verizon Fios system from the street to the end-user computer had been checked, verified and/or replaced, the issue had to be coming from Verizon’s main office.
The installer had already checked the main at the road that has the 3x2 green service cover on it by the side walk. Everything was in good working order. The tech called the main office to see if my buddy and I were on the same hub, basically a big splitter that continues the service from the main office to the homes, we were not. So that was ruled out…
My understanding of the system ends there. The only other components I know of are the Main branch’s routers, servers and software.
Verizon had a new connection speed added to their system, 25/15 about the same time our issue began. So I am guessing that when they updated the system to include this new connection speed they corrupted the software for the 20/5 connection.
We have been waiting to hear from the tech that was at my buddy’s house, to see if the issue will be dealt with. My buddy has called him a couple of times and he has mentioned that he is trying to get it addressed and to call back if we hadn’t heard from him. He remembered who he and I were and what the issue was, so I believe he is taking it seriously. How far he can move the issue is beyond me…
I want to add that my buddy and I have been customers with the all in one package from Verizon Fios since their services have moved into our area, about a year and a half… It has only been since about June that this issue has presented itself, before then we were on 7th heaven with the speeds. We couldn’t have been more than happy with the services.
This issue has caused that to all go afoul, not only do the speeds get down to less than 3mbs but the speed is not smooth at all. Rather the 3mbs speed is stop and go, freezing in between at times, very choppy. Barely usable at times, unless you restart the computers and start over.
We are hoping that anyone with Verizon Fios Internet Services will keep an eye on their speeds by going to http://speedtest.net and doing tests to verify they are getting the speeds they are paying Verizon for.
This is what it will take for Verizon to take this issue seriously is to gather everyone on the system that may be having the same issue. I believe it is everyone that is within the 1.2 miles from my house to my buddy’s and will distribute flyers to each and every house in between.
If you find that your speed is not as fast as it should be please contact me and I will add you to the list, this way we can see exactly how far this problem covers and perhaps it will also help to show a pattern and understanding as to why the issue is present in the first place.
My contact information,
I have left this out here, you can contact me on these forums...Actually what this came down to was an issue between Windows Vista and an Ethernet Card on one of the machines in each of our local networks.
Even though our two machines are 6 years apart, we both have the same ethernet adapter on our main desktops. A RealTek RTL8139/810x Family Fast Ethernet Nic. It seems that the adapter does not work at the 20mbs download speeds with Vista. For some reason the adapter does not shut down when the computer does? I don't understand why but it doesn't, it keeps the connection alive. I removed the ethernet cable and pulled the power cable and had my two other computers still connected to the network and found that the issue was resolved. The way I found out was that I used the connections on my main computer to hook up one I had laying around and through further testing found the problem no longer existed...
Then I realized that my buddy and I installed Windows Vista at about the same time, a couple of months ago. Funny how you can forget an important detail like that. Then I remembered that he had the same identical ethernet adapter as I did, I had noticed that while trouble shooting his computer at his home but didn't think it was important at the time. Until the issue was narrowed down to the adapter, then it all seemed to all fall into line.
Quite humbling... In the end, anyone who has Windows Vista and this NIC probably will have problems with the 20mbs download speed of the computers on their own networks. I tried the latest Vista driver from RealTek and also tried to roll back the driver, with no success....
Back at the beginning when we first had fios installed in our homes there wasn't an issue when we had the 10/2 speeds and had Vista. Then we decided to change from Vista to XP because we both were having issues as to what programs you could use and which you could not, shortly after having fios installed. Then when verizon upgraded us to 20/5 we were amazed at the speed and still had no issue because we had XP on our main computers with the RealTek adapters...
We reinstalled Vista because it seemed like we were having more issues with XP by getting hit with Antivirus2008 and its variants and thought it time for a change back...
It didn't really hit us that Vista could be the culprit because we both have a laptop in our networks that have had Vista on them from the get go when there were no issues... We also didn't notice just how bad it was right away and over time kind of left the Vista install out of the equation.
Just strange that one computer can effect all the other computers on the network, even when it is shut down...
I allowed the other two computers to run 24hours and the issue did not present itself, when I added the main computer with the RealTek adapter back to the mix it reappeared. The Realtek adapter is the only real common denominator between his machine and mine.
So now we have three choices,
We can go back to Windows XP.
We can buy a new NIC or a wireless card to replace the RealTek...
Hopefully this post will help anyone else who runs into this problem, it has been very frustrating to say the least...
Thanks to everyone for their help and I apologize for complaining about verizon when it was not a verizon issue. I came to the conclusion that the only part verizon really played was upgrading us to a 20/5 tier which I am thankful for...
Would be nice if this card was on a list that Verizon support could use to troubleshoot , diagnose or eliminate for future support issues.
Message Edited by keiser0619 on 08-06-2009 03:58 PM -
I Have a refurbished iPhone 5 that is less than a year old (apple replaced my first one due to a battery fault) but this one has all of a sudden become unresponsive most times and a purple haze has come thru the background on the lCd. The cursor goes abit cranky sometimes too and jumps from Window to window?! It has never been dropped or screen has never been replaced either no exposure to water or sun. This happened after I upgraded to the new iOS 8.1. I don't think it was the update but I've never had good results from updating the iPhone anyway..
HELP?? I have an appt with Apple tomorrow but don't know if I can wait that long!!
THanks in advance.Hey jojo-10!
Here is an article for you that can help you troubleshoot this issue with your iPhone:
iPhone and iPod touch: Charging the battery
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1476
Thanks for coming to the Apple Support Communities!
Regards,
Braden -
since updating my iphone 3gs software it has developed the so called "white screen of death" this happened immediately after software install. It has never been dropped or damaged. I have tried the solution which seems to pop up most of holding down the power button and the home button for 10 seconds but this hasnt helped at all. Tried ringing apple, who were less than helpful and disinterested as the phone is out of warranty. I am hoping there is a solution which doesnt mean shelling out for a new phone! any ideas?
Basics from the manual are restart, reset, restore.
Try all of these.
If these fail, then:
iOS: Unable to update or restore -
I've got a application deployment running in my environment being pushed to roughly 10k clients. It's a simple script and initially deployed quite well, hitting 81% success in the first 24 hours. Then something seems to have changed and clients
that were previously designated as "success" started jumping ship and being reclassified as "in progress", dropping my success percentage from 81% to 65% and now down to 42% over the past 3 days. The good news is that the "error"
state has stayed roughly stable at <1%, but I have no idea what might be causing the deployment to change states from "success" to "in progress" again on such a massive scale.
Additional odd behavior: There is a large discrepancy between what I see on the Monitoring Deployment overview and the drill-down of the application monitoring. In the deployment monitoring overview I'm seeing about 5.3k systems with the "in progress"
status. However, when I drill down into the deployment, and look at the specific "in progress" line items, adding them up comes to less than 1k. Conversely the total systems in the "success" category showing in the monitoring
overview (4.6k) match exactly to those in the drill-down under success. The difference between the two "in progress" figures simply don't appear in the drill-down at all (not under Error, Requirements not met or Unknown), they just seem to
be gone.
To cover a couple of obvious things. No changes have been made to the deployment since its inception. Content was successfully pushed to all DP's and has not been updated. The script running is a simple in-house script and is detected with
a registry value looking at a specific version number. It is configured to be hidden/silent and is invisible from an end user perspective.
Any ideas on what might be happening? I haven't found any logs either on the server or any of the clients that help me here, are there any specific logs I should be looking at? Thanks,
RobThanks for the reply. I figured out what was happening. Basically I was operating under a misunderstanding of how "retired" applications affected their associated deployments. I wrongly assumed that retiring an application would subsequently
suspend or disable the associated deployments. In digging further I discovered this is not true and deployments are kept active for retired applications (this is somewhat counter intuitive to me, but it is what it is).
So, what was happening with my deployment was that I had a previous version of the package still active in the environment and the two were waging war on one another. Version 1.0 was set to look for anything with "not v1.0" and deploy to it. Version
2.0 was set to look for anything "not v2.0" and deploy. The battle didn't appear in my testing because it took several days for the check-in process to recognize the changes and begin deploying the now old version on top of the new version.
Deleting the v1.0 deployment had an overnight impact returning my metrics to the expected levels. Hopefully this info is helpful to someone else in the future. -
I got my iphone 6 plus less than a week ago. I ordered from Verizon. My phone is now randomly going from having a good cell signal to giving me a message No SIM. I was able to make calls, now when I get this message, I can't connect to cell service, which defeats the point of having a cell phone! The phone is brand new and has not been dropped, damaged, or otherwise mishandled. Did I get a defective phone or what?
Hi! I got in touch with AppleCare last evening finally. They helped me clear the data blockage or whatever. It sounds like this is an issue they are aware of, because they said the phone was not defective. However, it happened again today and it took several times of me doing the resetting of the network and hard staring the phone before the problem cleared. It is just frustrating because it is hard to go without cell service for long periods of time. And no, I have not done anything with the SIM card. I don't know what it is or how it would be accessed on an iPhone! This might be something Verizon wants to take a closer look at with Apple.
Thank you for the follow up. I will let you know if the problem continues.
Angela Haseman
Sent from my iPhone
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hey guys, I'm trying to create receipt using receipt API. After running my code, I don't see the record in the table AR_CASH_RECEIPTS_ALL. I don't know what I'm doing wrong, here is how I call the API. set serveroutput on size 100000 DECLARE l_cash_r
-
How do I downgrade my ipod touch 4g from iOS 5.0.1 to iOS 5?
Is this possible?? If so, please help!
-
Error 503 in app manager or online
When I run adobe app manager it errors out with a 503 error and says it can't get list. I tried the solution on forum renamed folders and reinstall application manager and still same. I logged in to adobe.com and tried to bring up list from the websi
-
Error message at every Safari 4 start
Hello I installed Safari 4 under Windows XP and it works great ... until a Windows-update-restart( without warning). From now on - during every Safari start I get a Windows message "Safari meets some difficulties ... and has to close" with only 2 opt
-
Media can't be used because you don't have access privileges
Why is it that I cannot drag across an image from iphotos which I have previously photo streamed across from my iphone 5? I keep getting the following message "The media can't be used because you don't have access privileges, or because it has no co