Compliance requirements in share point,

Hi
what are the compliance requirements in sharepoint , 
as administrator or client  what information i will provide 
adil

These are business requirements. SharePoint's role is to conform to requirements specified by the business, it does not mandate them.
Edit: You seem to be working through a SharePoint questionnaire but lack the background knowledge to fill it in or who should be filling in what bits of it. Whilst this is a support forum you may wish to get some training or dedicated assistance.

Similar Messages

  • I require a 32 bit version of Firefox to process a single instruction in Share Point. Where can I get the 32 bit version of Firefox at any level?

    I am trying to utilize a function in SharePoint to permit me to open a library in Explorer mode. The function is available on the Share Point page and when I select the function my IE browser stops working. Unfortunately IE at it's current setup on my system is required for most internal applications. Chrome will not enable most of the functions in the Share Point site so that browser is unusable for my purposes. Upon research the current potential resolution to my problem is to run a 32 bit browser to enable my function. Due to the above mentioned limitations I require a 32 bit version of Firefox but the download only provides a 64 bit version because my system is 64 bit. How can I get a 32 bit version of Firefox?

    ''dstibbards [[#question-1048915|said]]''
    <blockquote>
    but the download only provides a 64 bit version because my system is 64 bit. How can I get a 32 bit version of Firefox?
    </blockquote>
    For what OS as Firefox for Windows from [https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/all/ www.mozilla.org] is only Win32 and will work on 32-bit and 64-bit Windows. Firefox for Mac OSX is a combined 32/64 and There are separate 32-bit and 64-bit versions for Linux.
    Where are you downloading Firefox to think it is a 64-bit version?
    The WOW64 in a browser useragent on Windows means it is a 32-bit application running of 64-bit Windows.

  • How to configure SharePoint HNSC with a reverse proxy server so that HNSC Share Point URLs are not exposed to end users.

    Could you please let me know how SharePoint HNSC can be configured with a reverse proxy server so that HNSC Share Point URLs are not exposed to end users.
    In normal path based site collections/web applications, reverse proxy configuration can be done using alternate access mappings with  Public URL = "proxy URL", internal = "HNSC Share Point URL" so that share point sends response back
    to Public URL = "proxy URL".
    In Host Named Site Collections,  alternate access mappings  are not supported. Each HNSC is designed to have only one URL in each zone. Zone is one of the five zones(Default,Intranet,Internet,Custom,Extranet) with each of which only one alternate
    URL is associated.  This is what we are able to get using power shell command "Set-SPSiteUrl", but this will not help us to get the response back to proxy URL after a request sent to share point because we could not find any mechanism in share
    point HNSC to respond  to a different URL(proxy URL). Consequently, Share Point URLs are exposed to  external users.
    Below share point article in MSDN blog is symmetrical to what we are observing with Share Point 2013 and Proxy Server. It mentions that internal HNSC URLs can’t be hidden using any proxy server. If  hiding the internal Share Point URLS is a requirement,
    it suggests to use a web application instead of host named site collections.
    Though I’m also observing the same behavior with Share Point 2013 HNSC, Could you please confirm my understanding is correct.
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kaevans/archive/2012/03/27/what-every-sharepoint-admin-needs-to-know-about-host-named-site-collections.aspx
    Excerpt from above article-
    "Host Named Site Collections Only Use One Host Name
    Continuing on the discussion on AAMs and host named site collections, you cannot use multiple host names to address a site collection in SharePoint 2010. Because host-named site collections have a single URL, they do not support alternate access mappings and
    are always considered to be in the Default zone.  This is important if you are using a reverse proxy to provide access to external users. Products like Unified Access Gateway 2010 allow external users to authenticate to your gateway and access a site
    as http://uag.sharepoint.com and forward the call to http://portal.sharepoint.com. Remember that URL rewriting is not permitted. Further, a site collection can only respond to one host name. This means if you are using a reverse proxy, it must forward the
    calls to the same URL.  If your networking team has a policy against exposing internal URLs externally, you must instead use web applications and extend the web application using an alternate access mapping."<u5:p></u5:p>

    Hi Satish,
    You are right that only one URL is allowed for each zone of the host-name site collections in both SharePoint 2010 and SharePoint 2013.
    It is by design that each host-name site collection only support one URL for each zone.
    The article below is about RTM version of SharePoint, and it is the same for SharePoint 2013 with the latest CU.
    https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2826457
    So to make the URL of HNSC not exposed to external users is not supported, you need to use path-based sites instead.
    Best regards.
    Thanks
    TechNet Community Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
    [email protected]

  • ACL on share points doesn't seem to work

    Hi Everyone,
    I have a server set up, with a series of share points on it. One of those folders is "Marketing", and the Marketing team has a boss, who is the only guy who should be able to create folders within that share.
    The people in the Marketing group, should have access to write and delete files, but not create folders.
    Here's the setup:
    Users/Groups:
    John (boss)
    Roger (one of the Marketing employees)
    John and Roger both belong to the Marketing group
    Share point ACL:
    Marketing / Allow / Custom ( full read, write attributes, write extended attributes, create files, delete )  but not create folder, delete subfolders and files
    John / Allow / Full Access
    As last detail, all users are on Apple computers.
    Problem
    John is able to do everything he should, create files, folders, etc.
    Roger on the other hand, can only read. 
    Question
    Does the ability to write files, require the ability to write folders?  If I let Marketing group write folders, Roger's access works.  If so, is there a workaround?
    Thanks!

    I know that order of the permissions in the acl window is relevant, from what ive learned on here based on different issues.  I think if you have a deny permission, and further down you have an allow permission so to speak, the allow overides.
    HTH

  • Can't mount share points over VPN after moving server

    I'm tearing my hair out over this one. We have a server that was located in our office. I just moved it downtown to a colo center (no longer in office) and set up VPN access.
    However, nobody is able to mount the server share points, even though the connection to the VPN seems to work fine (e.g.: I choose "connect to L2TP..." and it connects, VPN icon shows I am online with the server).
    Any attempt to mount a share point fails. I've tried using afp://servername.com and I've tried afp://64.xx.xx.xx (where that's the machine's public IP address). Am I supposed to use a different address (such as an internal 192 address that works over the VPN) or should I be able to mount the afp point using the server public domain name? Should I try NFS?
    Any help would be appreciated -- really need to get access to this system's files again! Thank you!

    Morris Zwick wrote:
    And does anyone know which IP you enter for your sites in the web service? The public static IP or the internal private static IP?
    For the external DNS server I am sure you have already deduced that it should be the static IP issued you by Comcast and this will be forwarded by your router to your server.
    For your internal DNS server you could use either the internal LAN IP, or the external IP although the later might be affected by your firewall so this you will need to test.
    For the Web Server service in Server admin, if your only running a single website you could avoid the issue by just using the wildcard entry which will respond to any IP address, so this would be an empty host name and an IP address of *
    In fact you don't have to specify an IP address you could just use the hostname, so it will listen to traffic arriving at your server addressed to any IP address and as long as the URL that was requested includes the hostname you define for the site it will get responded to. So if as an example you have two websites you want to serve
    www.example.com
    site2.example.com
    then as long as both have the IP address for the site as an * (asterisk) then both should work as separate sites for traffic addressed to either the LAN or WAN IP address of the server.
    You will still need to use two IP addresses on the server to enable VPN, you could use a USB Ethernet adapter for the second one. Port forwarding for VPN is not as simple as other traffic as VPN requires traffic different to the standard IP and UDP packets. Routers that support 'VPN Passthrough' are specifically designed to accomodate this but I don't know if the AirPort Extreme does this. I have also found PPTP copes better with this sort of setup than L2TP although PPTP is generally regarded as less secure.

  • Sso configuration in portal to share point portal

    Hi,
    Can you please provide me the steps to configure sso in portal to share point portal.
    my requirement is to create an iview that displays the shrepoint portal home page without asking user credentials.
    pls suggest UPID and logon tkt methods.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Sai Battula.

    Hi ,
    You can opt for SAML.
    Configuration from BASIS & Portal Side.
    [Setup SAML 1.1-based Web SSO from NetWeaver CE to non-SAP systems ]
    Configuration from Share Point side.
            [http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff607753.aspx]
    Also you can check out the third party tool  u201C btexx MOSS Integratoru201D . 
    [http://www.btexx.com/products/btexx-collaborationmanager/MOSS-WSS]
    [http://www.btexx.com/products/btexx-collaborationmanager/video]
    Regards
    Sahil Kohli

  • Cannot disable Homes: Enable Virtual Share Points

    Hello,
    We just installed 10.5 server this morning, and many things seem to be a big improvement-- e.g., the new version of Samba (3.0.25) now allows AD transitive trust users to connect, whereas 10.4's Samba (3.0.10) did not. But the problem now is: we cannot disable the virtual share points for homedirs on Samba. In Server Admin, if you uncheck the checkbox and hit "Apply", the GUI rechecks it.
    10.4 Server has this same configuration option, and it works as expected. I did a little investigation with the serveradmin command-line tool on our Leopard machine, and this tool exhibits the same problem. For example:
    floydpepper:/ admin$ sudo serveradmin settings smb:adminCommands:homes = no
    Password:
    smb:adminCommands:homes = yes
    For reference, we are set up as a Domain Member for Active Directory. We do not have any schema additions (for Mac stuff, anyway).
    I suspect that maybe there's some configuration option further up that supercedes this, and that's why Server Admin rechecks the checkbox. My guess was that maybe Directory Services was overlaying an attribute on top of AD information. And I see that if I use dscl and look at the attributes for my user in AD, there is indeed an attribute for home folders that clearly does not exist in the AD itself: "NFSHomeDirectory" which is set to /Users/[myusername]
    When I go back and us dscl to lookup the same thing in Tiger Server, Directory Services also appends the NFSHomeDirectory attribute, but without the same side-effect. So I'm probably mistaken that that is the cause.
    Anyone have any pointers? This looks an awful lot like a bug to me.
    Thanks,
    -b
    P.S. I also did have a look at where in smb.conf this is being set-- it is being put in an include'd smb.conf that is stored in /var/run. If I comment out the \[homes\] section, and restart Samba, that /var/run/smb.conf is overwritten with a new autogenerated version. I would just wipe that section out, lock the file, and restart Samba, but I really do want our administrators to be able to use the GUI tools. Otherwise, I would just be using Samba on Linux.

    I was able to "fix" the issue with an ugly workaround by modifying /etc/smb.conf and adding certain values to the [[homes]] share that render it ineffective. I added the following to /etc/smb.conf:
    ; Site-specific parameters can be added below this comment.
    ; END required configuration.
    ; Hack to disable virtual homes
    [[homes]]
    path = /dev/null
    valid users = root
    ; END hack
    With these values added to [[homes]], it is only available to the root user, and even then it would go nowhere. I debugged the issue to the point where it appears that the synchronize-preferences tool (/usr/libexec/samba/synchronize-preferences) ignores user settings for disabling virtual homes. I sent so far as to modify the system default in /System/Library/CoreServices/SmbFileServer.bundle/Resources/ServerDefaults.plis t to see if it was a simple case of default settings overriding user settings, but that also had no effect on the configuration that synchronize-preferences created in /var/db/smb.conf
    I hope this helps you all out.
    Message was edited by: Garret Huntress
    Message was edited by: Garret Huntress

  • Can't install Appfabric as a prerequisite for Share Point

    Hello,
    I'm working on a server with Microsoft Server 2012 R2, trying to install Appfabric because it is a prerequisite for Share Point.  In the results of the Appfabric installation wizard, all of the selected components, Hosting Services, Cache Client, and
    Hosting Administration all failed to install.  
    The detailed installation report says:
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  ===== Logging started: 2015-04-22 11:48:00-07:00 =====
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  File:             d:\c105a713e88bea48cfc5\setup.exe
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  InternalName:     Setup.exe
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  OriginalFilename: Setup.exe
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  FileVersion:      1.1.2106.32
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  FileDescription:  Setup.exe
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  Product:          Microsoft(R) Windows(R) Server AppFabric
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  ProductVersion:   1.1.2106.32
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  Debug:            False
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  Patched:          False
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  PreRelease:       False
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  PrivateBuild:     False
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  SpecialBuild:     False
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  Language:         Language Neutral
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  OS Name:                   Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  OS Edition:                ServerStandard
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  OSVersion:                 Microsoft Windows NT 6.2.9200.0
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  CurrentCulture:            en-US
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  Processor Architecture:    AMD64
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  Event Registration Source :    AppFabric_Setup
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Setup.Upgrade.V1UpgradeSetupModule : Initiating V1.0 Upgrade module.
    2015-04-22 11:48:00, Information           Setup  Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Setup.Upgrade.V1UpgradeSetupModule : V1.0 is not installed.
    2015-04-22 11:48:08, Information           Setup  Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Setup.Upgrade.V1UpgradeSetupModule : Initiating V1 Upgrade pre-install.
    2015-04-22 11:48:08, Information           Setup  Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Setup.Upgrade.V1UpgradeSetupModule : V1.0 is not installed, not taking backup.
    2015-04-22 11:48:08, Information           Setup  Executing C:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v4.0.30319\aspnet_regiis.exe with commandline -iru.
    2015-04-22 11:48:08, Information           Setup  Return code from aspnet_regiis.exe is 0
    2015-04-22 11:48:08, Information           Setup  Windows features successfully enabled.
    2015-04-22 11:48:08, Information           Setup  Process.Start: C:\Windows\system32\msiexec.exe /quiet /norestart /i "d:\c105a713e88bea48cfc5\Packages\AppFabric-1.1-for-Windows-Server-64.msi" ADDDEFAULT=Worker,WorkerAdmin,CacheClient,Setup
    /l*vx "C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\AppServerSetup1_1(2015-04-22 11-48-08).log" LOGFILE="C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\AppServerSetup1_1_CustomActions(2015-04-22 11-48-08).log" INSTALLDIR="C:\Program Files\AppFabric
    1.1 for Windows Server" LANGID=en-US
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup  Process.ExitCode: 0x00000643
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Error                 Setup  AppFabric installation failed because installer MSI returned with error code : 1603
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Error                 Setup  
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Error                 Setup  AppFabric installation failed because installer MSI returned with error code : 1603
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Error                 Setup  
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup  Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Setup.Core.SetupException: AppFabric installation failed because installer MSI returned with error code : 1603
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup     at Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Setup.Installer.WindowsInstallerProxy.GenerateAndThrowSetupException(Int32 exitCode, LogEventSource logEventSource)
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup     at Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Setup.Installer.WindowsInstallerProxy.Invoke(LogEventSource logEventSource, InstallMode installMode, String packageIdentity, List`1 updateList,
    List`1 customArguments)
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup     at Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Setup.Installer.MsiInstaller.InstallSelectedFeatures()
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup     at Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Setup.Installer.MsiInstaller.Install()
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup     at Microsoft.ApplicationServer.Setup.Client.ProgressPage.StartAction()
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup  
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup  === Summary of Actions ===
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup  Required Windows components
    :  Completed Successfully
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup  IIS Management Console
    :  Completed Successfully
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup  AppFabric 1.1 for Windows Server
    :  Failed
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup  Hosting Services
    :  Failed
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup  Cache Client
    :  Failed
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup  Hosting Administration
    :  Failed
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup  Microsoft Update
    :  Skipped
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup  Microsoft Update
    :  Skipped
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup  
    2015-04-22 11:48:41, Information           Setup  ===== Logging stopped: 2015-04-22 11:48:41-07:00 =====
    Does someone have an idea as to why the installation is failing?  
    Many thanks.

    Hi,
    For installing SharePoint 2013 SP1 Prerequisite on Windows 2012 R2, you can run the PowerShell Script of Ed (DareDevil57):
    https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/office/Sharepoint-2013-SP1-Server-2ed6dd27
    For more information,you can have a look at the blog:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/cjrawson/archive/2014/04/06/offline_2d00_sharepoint2013sp1_2d00_prerequisites_2d00_server2012r2.aspx
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/14582.sharepoint-2013-install-prerequisites-offline-or-manually-on-windows-server-2012-a-comprehensive-guide.aspx
    Best Regards,
    Eric
    TechNet Community Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
    [email protected]

  • Oracle EBS attachments from MS share point

    Hi All,
    Is it possible to integrate Oracle EBS with MS sharepoint document management system.
    My requirement is to attach MS share point documents to EBS records.
    Thanks,
    -Mukesh.

    Hi Mukesh,
    Assuming you are using SharePoint 2007.
    The following article offers us a tutorial about presenting data from Oracle E-Business Suite on a SharePoint Site:
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd788291.aspx
    Thanks.
    Pengyu Zhao
    TechNet Community Support

  • How to decide implementation way for share point site ?

    Hi,
    I am developing new share point site where i want to manage more hierarchical data with its own business requirements and flows.
    lets assume following scenario 
    there are multiple companies at very top level
    Every company contains multiple departments
    and every department have multiple groups (group of working people)
     I want to manage communication between each group within each company, and no two group from two diff companies should interact with each other.
    For this implement what will be the better approach for site design ?  and how can i implement such a hierarchical structure ?
    As i am new to share point , any help will be appreciable.
    Thanks,
    C Mahone

    Create a separate site collection for each company.  For every department you can have a sub site. You can create groups within the sub site.
    Once you separate the each company details in a separate site collection you will have more control over the security.
    Check the below link for site planning  in SharePoint
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee476994%28v=office.15%29.aspx
    My Blog- http://www.sharepoint-journey.com|
    If a post answers your question, please click Mark As Answer on that post and Vote as Helpful

  • Use of KM services and TREX Search Engine From share point portal

    Hi All,
    We would like to  Use of KM services and TREX Search Engine From share point portal.
    For this purpose we interoperability between windows sharepoint and SAP Portal.
    Please provide necessary documents or suggestions for interoperability for above requirement.
    mail id : <b>[email protected]</b>
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Swarna B

    Hi,
    See this this links:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9e891378-0601-0010-5386-a3387f1b161b
    Regards,
    Senthil K.

  • How to play share point library video in custom web part

    Hi  ,i want to play my share point library videos and computer videos  in custom web part , how can i do this ,playing static video and library video both are common.
    Thanks,
    Madhu.

    Do you want to create a player from scratch or use eg. the Silverlight media player:
    http://jomit.blogspot.de/2009/12/using-silverlight-media-player-of.html
    or   alternatively html5 and the <video> element (will probably require a couple of tweaks in the master page) ?
    Kind Regards
    Bjoern
    http://spviking.com
    Twitter: Follow @bjoern_rapp

  • 10.3 Server - Permissions for an images Share Point?

    Hello,
    I'm running 10.3 Server and I want to create a Share Point that acts as an images and logos depot. I want Guest users to access the folder, but I don't want them to be able to delete folders or files. At the same time, I want them to be able to copy the images and logos from the server and be able to edit them locally.
    Right now I have permissions set to Everyone = READ ONLY — so, they can't delete from the server, but at the same time, when the copy to their machine via Guest access, the files are still READ ONLY and they can't edit (without doing a save-as).
    Is there any way to set up a Share Point to do what I want?
    Thanks,
    Kristin.

    Hey Tony (or anyone else),
    I've finally got 10.5.4 Server up and running on a new Intel Xserve and I've set up all the users (home directories are on client machines, not network home folders) and groups. I went about building the images volume last night, and even though I'm now using ACLs (which is awesome), I'm still having the same issue I was having under 10.3 with respect to this issue. Basically, what I'm looking to do is this — I have a share point (mountable volume) called "Digital Resources", and within that share point is a folder called "Images". This "images" folder contains our master images library. I have a group called "Design" which has read-only access to "Digital Resources" as I want them to be able to view the library, but not make any modifications to files while on the server. But, I also want them to be able to copy images FROM the server onto their local desktop and have the ability to edit them (crop, resize, etc. based on their artwork requirements). The problem is, when they copy from the server to their local desktop, the files they copy come over with read-only permissions (which means they can't save their edits without doing a save-as, etc.). What do I need to do to make it so that when they copy a from the server to the desktop, the file inherits the local permissions, thus allowing them to "own" the file (without them having to deal with permission changes themselves)? We're potentially talking hundreds of images on a daily basis.
    Thanks!
    Kristin.

  • Using share point hosted app

    Hi All,
    I have a requirement like i need to create a share point hosted app that creates a list  with items and that data should be displayed in a grid in office 365 developer site in one of the page.Please send the javascript code for this.thanksin advance.
    Regards,
    Praveen

    Hi All,
    I have a requirement like i need to create a share point hosted app that creates a list  with items and that data should be displayed in a grid in office 365 developer site in one of the page.Please send the javascript code for this.thanksin advance.
    Regards,
    Praveen
    I would suggest you download the "Apps for SharePoint Sample pack". 
    http://code.msdn.microsoft.com/sharepoint/Apps-for-SharePoint-sample-64c80184
    There are several examples of SharePoint hosted-apps that you can learn from.
    Tom Brownell, MCTS, MCPD SharePoint 2010

  • Developing Stub in share point using Java

    Hi ,
    I have one requirement.that is Moving data from share point to hdfs(bigdata). after moving need to generate a stub in share point of original data using java.
    I have done moving data from share point to hdfs. 
    let me know how to generate stub in share point using java.
    Advance Thanks
    Hanuman
    [email protected]

    I'm thinking, create empty tekst files with identical names and optionally metadata required to dins the real data in hfsd, then add an http module (
    http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/52080/how-to-register-a-new-http-module-n-the-web-config ) to intercept and forward requests... But you won't be able to do that in a non-.NET language.
    Kind regards,
    Margriet Bruggeman
    Lois & Clark IT Services
    web site: http://www.loisandclark.eu
    blog: http://www.sharepointdragons.com

Maybe you are looking for