Components were not consumed while posting the goods receipt through VL32N
Hi Experts,
We are into technical upgrade. We are upgrading from 4.7 to ECC 6.0. We are facing one issue. The issue is while posting the goods receipt for the subcontracting shceduling agreement through VL32N (Inbound Delivery) component materials were not consumed. While displaying the material document for the GR, could not find any compponent materials consumed with movement type 543, where as if I use the MIGO transaction code for the same inbound delivery, I could see the component materials were consumed with movement type 543.
Could anybody tell us how to fix this issue if they come across.
Appreciate your reply.
Regards
Bala
Hi,
Try checking below SAP notes
Note 645119 - Problems with subcontracting using delivery
338119 - Goods receipt in inbound delivery for SC order
Hope this helps
Reg
Dheeraj
Similar Messages
-
Error while posting the Goods Receipt
Hi Friends,
I am having an issue while posting the Goods Receipt.
I am getting the error "Balance not zero: 1.000,00- debit: 0,00 credit: 1.000,00". I am using the Purchase Order with Account Assignment category P and K. When ever I used the account assignment category, I am getting this type of error. I have checked the configuration and every thing is OK. System is not able to debit the G/L account which is mentioned in the Purchase Order, hence the problem. However, I think system is able to get the G/L account (to Credit the amount) from Automatic Account determination.
Would like to know if any one come across similar type of problem and resolved it.
We have recently upgraded the system from 4.7 to ECC 6.0.
Apprciate the help.
Thank you,
PrakashHi
Thank you for the reply.
I have checked what you have mentioned. While creating PO it is determining the G/L account automatically through the assignments in OBYC. Even then I am getting the error while doing the Goods Receipt.
Any one is having any idea?
Thank you,
Prakash
Edited by: Prakash KM on Dec 17, 2010 6:26 PM -
Changing the G/L Account while Posting the Goods Receipts in MIGO
Hi All,
I have requirement in which G/L Account needs to be changed based on some validation while Posting the Goods Receipt in MIGO.
I have created exit in OBBH by copying the standard SAP Program RGGBS800 in view V_T80D.
I changed following entry in view V_T80D:
GBLS ZGGBS800 Val/sub:Exits for substitution
Now Inside program ZGGBS800, I have written the logic to change the BSEG-HKONT value with the new G/L Account which gets called inside the standard function module G_VSR_SUBSTITUTION_CALL.
FORM U999.
DATA : V_HKONT TYPE BSEG-HKONT.
clear : V_HKONT.
SELECT SINGLE SAKNR FROM ZMASH1 INTO V_HKONT WHERE MATNR = BSEG-MATNR AND WERKS = BSEG-WERKS.
IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
BSEG-HKONT = V_HKONT.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM.
After the execution of the above code the value of BSEG-HKONT changes with new value of V_HKONT but after this when I go further in Standard SAP code of function module G_VSR_SUBSTITUTION_CALL, there is one subroutine FORM EXP_TAB_009_BSEG being called which changes the value of BSEG-HKONT to initial value of HKONT also while moving the data from BSEG to TEMP_STRUCT it doesn't passes the HKONT value, which I want it be passed as I want the changed value to be passed finally to OUT_RESULT. Please look at the code below.
Following is the SAP standard code of subroutione FORM EXP_TAB_009_BSEG :
FORM EXP_TAB_009_BSEG
USING
IN_ORIG STRUCTURE BSEG
CHANGING
OUT_RESULT STRUCTURE BSEG
B_RESULT.
DATA: ORIG LIKE BSEG.
DATA: BEGIN OF TEMP_STRUCT,
ABPER LIKE BSEG-ABPER,
AUGGJ LIKE BSEG-AUGGJ,
DOCLN LIKE BSEG-DOCLN,
FIPOS LIKE BSEG-FIPOS,
FISTL LIKE BSEG-FISTL,
FKBER LIKE BSEG-FKBER,
FKBER_LONG LIKE BSEG-FKBER_LONG,
GEBER LIKE BSEG-GEBER,
GMVKZ LIKE BSEG-GMVKZ,
GRANT_NBR LIKE BSEG-GRANT_NBR,
HKTID LIKE BSEG-HKTID,
HZUON LIKE BSEG-HZUON,
INTRENO LIKE BSEG-INTRENO,
MEASURE LIKE BSEG-MEASURE,
PARGB LIKE BSEG-PARGB,
PPA_EX_IND LIKE BSEG-PPA_EX_IND,
PPRCT LIKE BSEG-PPRCT,
PRCTR LIKE BSEG-PRCTR,
PRODPER LIKE BSEG-PRODPER,
PRZNR LIKE BSEG-PRZNR,
PSEGMENT LIKE BSEG-PSEGMENT,
SAMNR LIKE BSEG-SAMNR,
SCTAX LIKE BSEG-SCTAX,
SEGMENT LIKE BSEG-SEGMENT,
SGTXT LIKE BSEG-SGTXT,
SRTYPE LIKE BSEG-SRTYPE,
UZAWE LIKE BSEG-UZAWE,
XREF1 LIKE BSEG-XREF1,
XREF2 LIKE BSEG-XREF2,
XREF3 LIKE BSEG-XREF3,
ZUONR LIKE BSEG-ZUONR,
ZZBUSPARTN LIKE BSEG-ZZBUSPARTN,
ZZCHAN LIKE BSEG-ZZCHAN,
ZZLOB LIKE BSEG-ZZLOB,
ZZLOCA LIKE BSEG-ZZLOCA,
ZZPRODUCT LIKE BSEG-ZZPRODUCT,
ZZREGION LIKE BSEG-ZZREGION,
ZZSPREG LIKE BSEG-ZZSPREG,
ZZSTATE LIKE BSEG-ZZSTATE,
ZZUSERFLD1 LIKE BSEG-ZZUSERFLD1,
ZZUSERFLD2 LIKE BSEG-ZZUSERFLD2,
ZZUSERFLD3 LIKE BSEG-ZZUSERFLD3,
END OF TEMP_STRUCT.
IF IN_ORIG = BSEG .
B_RESULT = B_FALSE.
OUT_RESULT = IN_ORIG.
EXIT.
ENDIF.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING BSEG TO TEMP_STRUCT.
OUT_RESULT = IN_ORIG.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING TEMP_STRUCT TO OUT_RESULT.
IF IN_ORIG = OUT_RESULT .
B_RESULT = B_FALSE.
ELSE.
B_RESULT = B_TRUE.
ENDIF.
BSEG = OUT_RESULT.
ENDFORM. " EXP_TAB_009_BSEG
I need the value of BSEG-HKONT should be passed to OUT_RESULT-HKONT.
I am not able to find any userexit or BADI for this.
Please guide me on this.
Thanks,
Chandravadan
Edited by: Chandravadan Jaiswal on May 8, 2009 2:18 PM
Edited by: Chandravadan Jaiswal on May 8, 2009 3:45 PMHi
I also need to change hkont while posting MIGO and MIRO transaction..
Any suggestion for this?
Here's my problem.. Substitution of account(HKONT) when posting in MIGO/MIRO -
Can't able to post the Goods Receipt in MB31
I had create plant - 7177, Warehouse-I - 717 (For finished material) & Warehouse-II - 718 (For Semi finished material). While creation of finished material in MM01, i was entered the wherehouse no as 718. With this parameter, i cant able to post the goods receipt in MB31- For Finished Material. An error message appeared as "material not exit in the WH-717 in plant 7177". What is the procedure to solve this problem?
Hi,
In order header, go to goods receipt tab, check the storage location maintained. I think this storage location / plant combination is not linked to warehouse 717.
Hope this answers your query.
If helpful award points
Regards,
Vivek -
Need RFC which can post the Goods Receipt
Hi,
My scenario is to post the Goods receipt, by using file and after posting the Goods Receipt i want the acknowledgement whether it is successful or unsuccessful. There is an idoc MBGMCR02 which can post the Goods Receipt but application acknowledgement is not possible in file to idoc scenario, so now i am searching for a RFC so that i can handle this situation using BPM synchronous process. Kindly suggest any RFC or BAPI which can post the Goods Receipt.
Thanks & Regards,
VenkatHi Venkat,
As per my understanding this is a "File To (Inbound) Proxy" scenario, in which you can use the BAPI "SD_SHIPMENT_POST_GOODS_ISSUE" to do the PGI into R/3 system.
To perform this, you can go-ahead with the steps as mentioned below:
Source (XI) System:
1. Create the source & target data type in XI.
2. Do required mapping in XI.
3. In configuration directory, use the adapter type "XI" on the receiver communication channel.
Target (R/3) System:
1. Call transaction "SPROXY".
2. Create the interface class (double click on Inbound message Interface, inside your namespace in R/3).
3. Inside the class (proxy), create an internal table to keep all the records which will be coming from XI after your mapping.
4. Pass all the data to above create internal table.
5. Now, call function module "SD_SHIPMENT_POST_GOODS_ISSUE" and pass all required data from ur internal table to this FM (BAPI).
Note: Kindly read about this FM (BAPI) first in SE37 under "Function Module Documentation".
6. Do commit work after calling the FM (BAPI).
I hope this will help you to resolve all your queries.
Regards,
Sarvesh Singh -
Error when posting the goods receipt
Hi we have recently successfuly updated 4.6 B to ECC 6.0.But when i am doing captive consumption by 949 Mvt. through process message system gives an error that
Error when posting the goods receipt
Message no. CB345
Diagnosis
With the selected process message, a goods receipt for the order was reported to the warehouse (destination ZPI1). However, an error occurred when the goods receipt was posted.
Please do needful.
Regards,
PPHi Daniel,
This is the first time i am coming across an issue like this.
neverthless from a logical front,
1. Remove Cost center as a valid receiver in Settlement Profile.
2. Your OKB9 setting are pretty much good. No need to worry about it. Becasue, OKB9 only will work if the system doesn't identify any other cost object. In this case Production Order is an automatic cost object which system should have taken.
3. Check the Settlement rule when you have created Production Order. It should have been MAT.
4. I hope you are creating Production Order with Material (using CO01 and not CO07)
5. Make sure in OPL8, the default rule in controlling tab is PP1.
Once all these are fine, i do not see any reason why you will get your probelm.
Please check and revert back to me if the problem still persists.
Best Regards
Surya -
Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt m
Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt movement for the same material, into the same period?
We try to explain better, today we've done a test:
Step 1 : We have created a material, wich material type is HAWA, with price control V, and 1 euro for 1 ST.
Step 2 : We have post a good receipt movement, 561 of this material with 1000 ST of stock, and on posting date: 05.05.2011.
Step 3 : Then, we have post a good issue movement, 562 of the same material, with 500 ST of stock, on posting date: 01.05.2011 ( so that, the posting date of the 562 is before from the posting date of 561).
And it has worked, so that on trx "mb51" for this material we saw:
PLANT1-----STO1---- 562----- Mat. Doc.101.05.2011--
500- ST
PLANT1-----STO1---561Mat. Doc.205.05.2011--
1000 ST
And with "fbl3n" for this G/L account , the same situation:
G/LAccount1--DocumentNo101.05.2011--99--
500- EUR
G/LAccount1--DocumentNo205.05.2011--89--
1000 EUR
We don't like this fact, someone knows how is it possible? The negative stocks aren't flagged!!!!
Edited by: Ariana Serrano Aguila on May 5, 2011 5:50 PMHi,
Though sap allows like this ,, the document created will be with the date of the actual posting system date. If you look into the MSEG table you will get to know this.
In theory .. this kind of practice should not be allowed .
since this is a 562 which is a individual entry may be system would have allowed.you try a 102 .
Regards, -
Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt
Is it possible to post a good issue movement before post the good receipt movement for the same material, into the same period?
We try to explain better, today we've done a test:
Step 1 : We have created a material, wich material type is HAWA, with price control V, and 1 euro for 1 ST.
Step 2 : We have post a good receipt movement, 561 of this material with 1000 ST of stock, and on posting date: 05.05.2011.
Step 3 : Then, we have post a good issue movement, 562 of the same material, with 500 ST of stock, on posting date: 01.05.2011 ( so that, the posting date of the 562 is before from the posting date of 561).
And it has worked, so that on trx "mb51" for this material we saw:
PLANT1 STO1 562 Mat. Doc.1 01.05.2011 500- ST
PLANT1 STO1 561 Mat. Doc.2 05.05.2011 1000 ST
And with "fbl3n" for this G/L account , the same situation:
G/LAccount1 DocumentNo1 01.05.2011 99 500- EUR
G/LAccount1 DocumentNo2 05.05.2011 89 1000 EUR
We don't like this fact, someone knows how is it possible? The negative stocks aren't flagged!!!!
Edited by: Ariana Serrano Aguila on May 5, 2011 5:50 PMSAP only checks if there is enough quantity in the period (month), it does not check if there is enough stock at date level.
there is no stock stored in any table for a given date. SAP would need to run the logic of MB5B to calculate the stock at a certain date, this would cause tremendous performance issues.
you either have to do this calculation yourself in a user exit, or you better train your users. -
Posting period 011 2013 is not open while posting the document using F-02 getting the error
Hi SAP Captains,
Pls help me here.
While posting the document using T-code F-02 getting the error "Posting period 011 2013 is not open.
Please help me how to do, can you provide step by step.
Rgds..SureshHi Suresh,
You can search google and will get number of posts on this. This will lead to duplication of similar posts on forum.
The message says "FI posting period is closed for 11th period of 2013". In which period you are trying to post the transaction?
If it is past, open the FI posting periods in OB52.
BR, Srinivas Salpala -
MB1C - Sloc 0001, Mov type 561 (not able to post the goods)
When I post inventory for ROH material
using movement type 561 (Tcode:MB1C) with
SLOC 0001, the system errors outs with the following message
"Material XXXX doesnot exist in warehouse 001"
Iam not maintaining warehouse management for ROH materials.
But I am able to post for the same material with Sloc 0002
Its the issue with sloc 0001
System posts the following Message:
Material XXXX does not exist in warehouse 001
Message no. L9023
Diagnosis
All the materials that you use within a warehouse number must also be
defined for this warehouse number. The material you are using is not
defined.
Procedure
If you want to use the material within your warehouse number, you must
create the material in the material segment for that warehouse number.
Is there any workaround, where I need not maintain WHSE management view for ROH
materials but still able to post the goods with Sloc 0001Csaba/Rajesha:
Thank you for your replies
For the Sloc 0001, like mentioned it is assigned to whse number 001
I tried to remove/delete the whse number 001 for the sloc0001, but its a entry required
field
In order to fullfill the requirement, maintained the same whse number(HMM) that is
being maintained for sloc 0002 {for which I was able to post (Mvt type 561, Tcode MB1C)}
In MB1C Mtype 561 posted with sloc 0001, Now the system posts
"Material XXXX doesnot exist in warehouse HMM" (previously it gave "Material XXXX doesnot exist in warehouse 001")
It does not give the message for Sloc 0002
Any way in this process, I learned some new things
Due points have been assigned -
Error-while posting the goods in plant
Hi,
i got error message like this while posting goods in the plant with t.code MB1C
"Account determination for entry INT GBB_______ BSA 3100 is not possible"
can any one know about solution for this error
Thanks®ards
kishore kumarhi
Hi,
Use t.code:OBYC, enter chaart of account
Click GBB
In next screen enter Val. Gro. Code, Acct Gro. Code, Valuation class and G/L accounts for Dr & Cr and save.
Note: before that u have save the Rules
How to save Ruls:
OBYC-> enter chart of account-> Click BSX->Click Rules
Select the check box of Debit/Credit in accounts , General modification, Valuation Modification, Valuation class Account are determine based on TAB and save.
Regards, -
Process Order Warning Message while doing the Goods Receipt
Dear All,
While doing the GR against process order via t.code MB31, we are getting a warning message which reads u201CProduction date of bch 110420 (17.06.2011) does not match the prod. date entered (26.08.2011)u201D this happens only if the batch number already exists in the system for the same material code , in this scenario if the user ignores the warning message & posts the document the existing batch number production date also will be over written with current/inputted manufacturing dateu2026 this will collapse the batch traceability. Is there a way to customize where we can have a different production date for same batch number?..
For example:
Batch Number: ABCD
Production date 10.02.2011
Batch Number: ABCD
Production date 11.02.2011
Batch Number: ABCD
Production date 12.02.2011
Regards,
SivanandanI'm sorry to say that I find your requirement to be absolutely not logical; a batch is, by definition, a homogenous quantity of a material, that you want to separate by it's characteristics from other, different, quantities of the same material.
If you decided that manufacturing date is a characteristic of the batch, then it has to be unique for one batch.
So, as I see it, you have two options: either decide that manufacturing date is not important and do without, or have different batches for the different dates. -
Hello team,
We are receiving the goods against with the Imports PO. Before the GR, we have paid the Customs duties to the Indian government. And, in the Invoice of Customs (MIRO), the CVD and ADC G/L Accounts got debited with the respective Accrual Accounts which are maintained in the Pricing of Imports at the CVD and ADC conditions. But, as per the standard procedure, during the GR, the same gets credited. But, it's not happening.
Can anybody suggest what is the bug here that we need to correct?
Thanks in advance for your response.
Regards,
SatyaHave you used subtransaction type IP in MIGO.
Refer below notes.
929681
- Subtransaction type not picked up for ADC in MIGO C&P EI
910681
- Legal changes on Additional Duty of Custom
and
964190
- ADC on domestic purchase of imported goods
Regards
Binoy -
I have had to open a new account, however, there were App updates that did not get installed before I opened the new account. Therefore, when I try to do the updates, it's is asking for the sign-in and password for the old account, which I do not have this information.
All apps are tied to the Apple ID they are purchased with and is not transferable.
Delete these apps and download them with the new Apple ID. -
Not able to post rough goods receipt
Hi Gurus,
While creation of Rough GR with ref to PO or inbound delivery through T.code VL41 I am getting error as "No deliveries created (check log)". While checking log "4500000167 000010 Partner determination procedure does not exist" in T.code VL41. Message 255.
I don't know which partner procedure is meant.
Any hints?
Kind regards,
FrankHi Frank,
Currently i am working in Rough GR scenario. I am getting the error while doing Vl41 as follows,
No deliveries created (check log)
4500017956 000010 Partner determination procedure does not exist
What could be the reason?
I believe you were overcome this issue.
Please guide me.
Appreciate your great help.
Regards
Rifaie M
Maybe you are looking for
-
TS1538 What do I do after step 6 in "If the Apple Mobile Device USB Driver is not listed"?
i'm very confused about step 5, "Verify that the Apple Mobile Device USB Driver is installed" > "If the Apple Mobile Device USB Driver is not listed", what do I do after step 6? I looked for and found the entry that recognizes the device as a camera,
-
.
-
Oracle 9i version for Windows ME
Hi, Can you please tell me what is the most appropriate version for Oracle 9i personal edition to run on Windows ME. Thanks.
-
Macbook pro has had many kernal panics now won't even start
I've read the phrases kernal panic and failing gpu. I stating getting these a few months back. They have been happening in clusters. Now after closing the book it won't start at all and it feels hot. Its gotten hop in the past when apparently it kept
-
I am having a problem with footer content shifting. In four out of five browsers, my footer text appears outside of the footer at the bottom of the main content but above the footer area. The background image does not move and is in the right locatio