Concern while Posting CLFMAS in ECC

Hello Experts,
I am trying to post CLFMAS02 Idoc in ECC from ECC itself using IDoc Test Tool. After posting the Idoc fails and shows status-51 with error 'Object 1455 from table has not yet been created. For this reason, no class allocations can be maintained for this object''. 1455 is the material number i entered for which i need to maintain classifications.
Kindly guide me if I am maintaining the wrong details:
OBJEK                   1455 (Materail Number)
KLART                  200
OBJECT_TABLE    MARA
CLASS                  COMP_CLS
MSGFN                  004
ATNAM                 COMPONENT
ATWRT                 123
MESTYP                CLFMAS
Pls advice.
Thaks and Regards,
Elizabeth.

Hi Antony,
Thanks for your inputs.
I am able to attach classes to a material manually even through MM02 and Cl02N. What i intend to try is that when an IDoc from an exteranl system is received in ECC for CLFMAS , will the class details get saved on the material passed in CLFMAS.
Bottom Line: I am testing an Inbound CLFMAS02 Idoc which is failing in ECC with error 'Object not created....'
Regards,
Elizabeth Jacob.

Similar Messages

Object (MARA) not found error while posting CLFMAS Idocs

Good day,
We are migrating the class hierarchy using Transaction CLHI (mesg. type - CLFMAS) from one SAP system to another.
When we try to post CLFMAS Idocs in the receiving system, we are encountering this error-
Object < > from table MARA has not yet been created. For this reason, no class allocations can be maintained for this object.
On further research, we found that this class (say parent class), has a subordinate class assigned to it that gets sent in the Idoc. The child class is not present in the receiving side, hence the error.
Now when we try to ALE the child class first (before the parent), the same idoc as above scenario gets created with the same error that the child class is not present.
These are our field values in the Idoc-
Segment E1OCLFM MSGFN   004
                                 OBTAB MARA
                                 OBJEK   Child (or subordinate class) class
                                 KLART   001
                                 MAFID    K
                                 Object_table MARA
Segment E1KSSKM MSGFN   004
                                 CLASS   Parent class
                                 DATUV   00000000
                                 STATU    1
There is one other issue that we are missing is that we are trying to migrate the material
classes/ hierarchies. We are not yet mapping the material # to it. Why is it that the object table name is MARA.
Please advise. TIA!!
Liz

Hi!
Any ideas anyone?
TIA, Liz

Error while posting the parked document in ECC 6.0

Hello ABAPers,
After upgrade from R/3 4.6c to ECC 6.0, when we try to post the parked documents ,It calls FM :POSTING_INTERFACE_DOCUMENT".
Inside it a call transaction is done using FBVB which throws error while posting for more than 4 withholding tax types.
Error : Field WITH_DIALG-WT_BASE(5) does not exist in the screen SAPLFWTD 0100.
On running BDC in foreground mode ,Error is happening when the withholding dialog opens and screen seems to be small to input all the tax codes i.e it shows only 4-5 rows and hence only 4 tax types passes to the screen and remaining is left out and error is thrown. This results in document not getting posted.
But in 4.6 c a bigger screen pops up and no error is thrwon.
We are not able to check FBVB directly, since it does'nt allow Direct call to this transaction.
We have checked lots of thread and notes ,But nothing seems to be relevant or helpful in our case.
Could you please help us in resolving this issue/ let us know if any configuration/ screen variant change is required?
Thanks!
Regards,
M M Jaffer.

Hello Nabheet ,
It is a standard code. We are calling the FM 'PRELIMINIARY_POSTING_POST_ALL' for posting the parked document. The FM calls internally another FM 'POSTING_INTERFACE_DOCUMENT'. This calls the transaction FBVB where we get the above error.
Thanks.

Error while posting GR from EWM in ECC. "Problem with receiver finding"

Hi
I have completed putaway of inbound delivery in EWM. This has triggered PPF to ECC for GR posting. This is stuck in ECC SMQ2 with error "Problem with receiver finding".
I have checked ECC>EWM interface configuration. Handling unit management setup in ECC and EWM. Do not see any issues there. Also tested GR account postings with IM storage location for Po in ECC. This is also working fine...so no issue with account determination.
Unable to figure out what is causing issue. Please help. Thank you.
Best Regards
phani sai MN

Hi All
Thanks for your responses. Issue was with distrubution model fiter parameters. for message type InboundDelivery.Deliverychange there was additional filter parameter for logical system. Removed values for logical system and only retained warehouse number.
With this issue is resolved. GR is posted succesfully in ECC.
Best Regards
Phani sai MN

Error while posting parked document

Hi all,
We are in ECC 5.0. While posting a parked invoice document, (created
through MIRO), the system is giving an error saying, 'Account XXXXXX
requires an assignment to a CO object . Msg. No. KI235) for Rounding off
account.
This G/L account has a cost center assigned in OKB9 and there is no
problem in the validity of the cost center and it is being displayed
when the document is simulated.
We are facing this problem only when posting a parked document.
While directly posting a document, there is no problem.
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Sundar Rao

Hi Paul,
The error is occuring when I am posting a parked invoice document. When I try and post it directly through MIRO, there is no problem.
I am unable to understand your reply. Can you please elaborate?
Regards,
Sundar Rao

Error while posting in PRRW

Hi,
I'm getting an error message " E F5A190 Enter a business place under Basic data" while posting the trip to FI using transaction PRRW. We are using ECC 6.0. Any pointers would be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Sudhakar.

Hi Sudhakar,
You can maitain Parameter ID through SU01 transaction(under Parameter tab).
Also please check, whether there are any validations for accounting document postings through OB28 transaction.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Praisty

Error while posting the Goods Receipt

Hi Friends,
I am having an issue while posting the Goods Receipt.
I am getting the error "Balance not zero: 1.000,00- debit: 0,00 credit: 1.000,00". I am using the Purchase Order with Account Assignment category P and K. When ever I used the account assignment category, I am getting this type of error. I have checked the configuration and every thing is OK. System is not able to debit the G/L account which is mentioned in the Purchase Order, hence the problem. However, I think system is able to get the G/L account (to Credit the amount) from Automatic Account determination.
Would like to know if any one come across similar type of problem and resolved it.
We have recently upgraded the system from 4.7 to ECC 6.0.
Apprciate the help.
Thank you,
Prakash

Hi
Thank you for the reply.
I have checked what you have mentioned. While creating PO it is determining the G/L account automatically through the assignments in OBYC. Even then I am getting the error while doing the Goods Receipt.
Any one is having any idea?
Thank you,
Prakash
Edited by: Prakash KM on Dec 17, 2010 6:26 PM

Document Splitting problem while posting asset acquisition using F-90

Hi,
We are using ECC 6.0 with document splitting functionality and are facing problem while posting asset acquisition using F-90.
The transaction entry details are as below:
Document Type - KR
Vendor Line Item PKey - 31
Amount - 10000
Asset Line Item with PKey - 70, Transaction Type - 100
Amount - 10000
The Document Splitting Rule - 0000000012 is used and the Field Status Group for the Vendor Reconciliation Account and Asset Reconciliation account have Cost Center, Profit Center and Segment as "Optional" field.
The Balance Sheet Item - Asset Reconciliation Account has been created as
Secondary Cost Element - 90.
The Profit Center and Segment field have been made mandatory and zero balancing is also set in the settings for Document Splitting.
While posting asset acquisition using F-90, we are getting the error message - "Balancing Field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled"
The first line refers to the Vendor Line item.
Please let me know how to overcome this error.
Regards,
Ramanand

Please follow the below path and do config :-
IMG>FA>Asset Accounting>Integration with the General Ledger>Additional Account Assignment Objects>Specify Account Assignment Types for Account Assignment Objects
here you have to put KOSTL (Cost center) for both against APC and Dep run for each Dep area.
Thanks
Pyare

Components were not consumed while posting the goods receipt through VL32N

Hi Experts,
We are into technical upgrade. We are upgrading from 4.7 to ECC 6.0. We are facing one issue. The issue is while posting the goods receipt for the subcontracting shceduling agreement through VL32N (Inbound Delivery) component materials were not consumed. While displaying the material document for the GR, could not find any compponent materials consumed with movement type 543, where as if I use the MIGO transaction code for the same inbound delivery, I could see the component materials were consumed with movement type 543.
Could anybody tell us how to fix this issue if they come across.
Appreciate your reply.
Regards
Bala

Hi,
Try checking below SAP notes
Note 645119 - Problems with subcontracting using delivery
338119 - Goods receipt in inbound delivery for SC order
Hope this helps
Reg
Dheeraj

Incorrect documents error while posting

Hi Gurus,
While posting the documents for a couple of pernrs for the period 08/2009 I am getting the following error.
"Period 007 in fiscal year 2009 is open for posting for the variant for posting periods 0001. However, you do not have the required authorization."
I have already posted the correct documents for these pernrs for period 07/2009 .
I am not sure why its popping a mssg for period 007/2009
Also the the status of the payroll control record is Exit payroll 08/2009
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Hi,.
Somewhere missed fiscal year variant periods in the t.code OB29.
If you dont have authorization, Pls concern your FI team they will know where to define fiscal year period 007 and posting period 0001.
If they dont have authorization get the authorization from the basis team. then do the task.
Good luck
Devi

Exchange rate difference while posting ME21N MIGO and MIRO

Hi All,
I am facing one problem with exchange rate type between M and EURX and EURX is maintanined in the SPRO>SAP Netweaver>General Settings>currencies>Check Exchange rate types
EXRT : EURX
Usage    : EMU Reg,fixed
Ref.Curr    : EUR
Buy.ra.at
Sall .Rat.At
Inv
EMU   :X
FIXED
Scenario:
Company(USD) is maintaning Exchange rate type: M and no exchange rates are maintained for USD:EUR or EUR:USD.
Eur is maintaing in Exchange rate type EURX.
1) PO (ME21N) is posting for the Vendor on posting date 01/01/2008. Transaction currency is EUR and company code currency is USD and Quantity : 25000
--> Exchange rate 'M' is not maintained for EUR and values are picking from the EURX Type. In the PO, Exchange rate is picking correctly from the EURX table entries on 01/01/2008.
2) MIGO: GR is posted on 01/25/2008 and with 15000 Quantity. Exchange rate is getting currecly from the table on 01/25/2008.
3) MIRO: IR is posted on 02/15/2008 and Vendor Account is picking correct exchange rate from the table but GR/IR account is caluculations EUR:USD is differntly .
Note: It is not GR based IR.
Ex:
PK AC                DESCRIPTION                    Tran Curr (EUR)    Local Curr USD
31 5004789     Vendor Account                       24,718.48-            38,777.12- USD
86 2525000      A/P-GR/IR NON-INV                24,718.48            38,883.73 USD
91 6584785      SERV-OTHER O/S                    0.00                 106.61- USD
Here GR/IR account is cal dirrently.
4) Credit Memo posted against IR on 03/25/2008. Exchange rate is given while posting CM same as Invoice. But system rate is different. Here also how the GR/IR is calculating is question is it not taking from Table or from any other rate types . Same problem like IR for GR/IR account.
Entry is posted like
PK ACC         Description                            Tran curr(EUR) Local curr(USD)
21 5004789     Vendor                                   24,718.48        38,777.13 USD
96 2525000     /P-GR/IR NON-INV                   24,718.48-      38,892.22- USD
81 6584785     SERV-OTHER O/S                     0.00            115.09 USD
This problem is same like GR and also SPL document is posting differenly for ZG and ZL ledger.
ZL ledger is posting same like Accounting CM document ZG is posting with the different amount . This different amount is nothing but the exchange rate as per the posting date 03/25/2008. Exchange rate on 03/25/2008 is differe from IR date 02/15/2008 .
ZL ledger is calculating based on the 02/15/2008 date and ZG ledger is calculating based on the 03/25/2008 . Difference between Exchange rate entered in the CM and 03/25/2008 table entry rate is showing exchange rate difference field in the Addtional field in the document display.
Thanks in Advance.

Dear Friends,
Thanks for your helpful answers, actually we are in big export business. So we have to clear 100s of invoice lines with payments at one go, (which obviously being booked at different dates) so it would be very difficult for the user to go one by one invoice.
My concern is, why system does not calculate exchange rate difference based on actual documents, i.e. Invoice to payments only. I think there might be some configuration needed to implement this functionality.
Please help.
Regards

Problem while posting in MIGO

Dear All,
Need your urgent help.
While posting in MIGO, i am getting a short dump, run time error--Message_Type_X. The details of trigger location of runtime error is as follows:
Program: SAPLMBWL
Include: LMBWLU21
Row: 59
Function Module Name: MB_POST_GOODS_MOVEMENT.
Abaper is not able to solve the problem. He said some table has become inconsistent.
I am able to create PO and also when I am checking GR document, it is giving OK message, but as soon as I am posting the document, program is getting terminated and it is giving runtime error
Dear its very urgent as my client is sitting on my head. I shall be really grateful, if you can solve the problem.
Regards,
Amit

Dear Tushar,
Can i have your email-id.
As far as user exit is concerned, i am not using any user exit. It's just terminating at the time of posting. I will send the dump and abaper analysis on your e-mail
Thanks & Regards,
Amit

GL Account taking wrong Functional Area while posting

Hello All,
IN GL account master records for one GL account there is functional area assigned D110 but While posting made to this accounts its taking Another Functional area D220
Please let me know whether any one has faced same issue
Regards,
Prashant

Hi Prashanth,
I have the same issue with ECC 6.0 & New Gl Active and could you please share how you have resolved this issue?
Regards
Aashish Kedia

I want to capture data through I/O while posting to Customer Line items

Hi Experts
Can you please suggest me that while posting to Customer line items i would require to capture data through Internal Order, is this possible if yes please explain
Regards
Sreenivasulu

Hi
Internal Order details can be updated to the P&L line item ie revenue line item in your case. From ECC 6.0 it will be available in the General Ledger view of the document.
Regards,
Lakshmanan Krishnan

SAP Version to be added in the subject line while posting a question.

Hi,
We all have been posting and answering thousands of questions on the SDN. Many times I have seen moderators asking the person who posted a question to use a correct and informative subject line.
With respect to that, I would like to suggest the moderators to add a rule in the rules of engagement asking the users to provide the SAP Version in the subject line while posting questions.
This way the person answering the question can appropriately provide information based on that version only and would save the time and effort of everyone.
Example subject line can be :
ECC 6.0 Function module xyz is not returning correct results.
I would like to know the opinion of other users too on what they think about this suggestion.
Best regards,
Advait

In theory - a very good idea.
In practice - hard to enforce.
On second thoght, it could be a required parameter. It might have the added benefit of dissuading questions from people who can't figure out which version they have
Rob
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Jan 16, 2009 3:56 PM

Concern while Posting CLFMAS in ECC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for