Condition based records sent to proxy

Hi all,
My interface is a File(FCC)-Proxy in PI7.0. I get 100s of records from the source and there are fields ID and LOC.
Fields which has ID=2 and LOC=US or UK, only those particular records should be sent to the proxy. Please help.
Thanks,
Chaitanya

hi chaitanya,
   "Condition based records sent to proxy"
   Based on condition you sent records, in interface determination we have condition option there you define the condition .Based on payloda values we send it.
1)   left operand : ID = Right operand : 2
2) Left Oreand :LOC = Right Operand : US OR(Insert Group We select Operation OR)
     Left Oreand :LOC = Right Operand : UK
regards,
ganesh.n

Similar Messages

How to create a condition based on a select that retrieve dynamically a LOV

Hi all, I need to create a condition based on a select that retrieve dynamically a LOV.
So, the condition have to be:
inventory_item_id NOT IN (SELECT inventory_item_id FROM apps.mtl_system_items_kfv WHERE concatenated_segments = 'GENERAL_FAULTS_IPTV')
I need to create a LOV based on this select without making any join with the folder which contains the field inventory_item_id, because otherwise I have the contradiction:
and o124757.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID = o118741.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID -- join between the main custom folder (o118741) and the LOV custom folder (o124757)
and o118741.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID NOT IN (o124757.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID) -- condition
These two condition together don't show any data, obviously....This means also, that I can't use a calculated field, because if I want to see this field, I have to create a join, another time, with the main custom folder.
I tried to create a LOV on the Administrator, but when I create the condition I have to check manually the values....and if in the future this LOV will increase I need every time to re-check all the values.....instead I need that the inventory_item_id have to be NOT IN dinamically in the list of values retrieved by the select.
Anybody has inplemented something similar ??
Thanks in advance
Alex

Hi alex,
SELECT incidents.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID,
pcodes.PROBLEM_NAME
FROM apps.cs_incidents_all_b incidents,apps.jtf_rs_problem_codes_v pcodes
WHERE incidents.category_id IN (SELECT category_id
FROM mtl_categories_kfv
WHERE concatenated_segments = 'IPTV')
AND incidents.PROBLEM_CODE = pcodes.PROBLEM_CODE
where incidents.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID NOT IN SELECT inventory_item_id
FROM apps.mtl_system_items_kfv
WHERE concatenated_segments = 'GENERAL_FAULTS_IPTV'
You want to add this condition to the first query it holds good for this scenerio.All the items which are NOT IN will be retrieved.Here you are selecting other than "General_faults_iptv"
But again your trying to select in the second query where you want "General_faults_iptv"
SELECT inventory_item_id
FROM apps.mtl_system_items_kfv
WHERE concatenated_segments = 'GENERAL_FAULTS_IPTV'
If you carefully go through what your doing,you will understand.In the above explantion ,there will be no records generated.First query your saying NOT IN and again your saying for the same IN,how will records retrieve its meaningless.
I dont know what you want to get from second query.I would suggest you to do is dont use the second query and just use the first query and you will get.Here is the query and this will give you result.
SELECT incidents.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID,
pcodes.PROBLEM_NAME
FROM apps.cs_incidents_all_b incidents,apps.jtf_rs_problem_codes_v pcodes
WHERE incidents.category_id IN (SELECT category_id
FROM mtl_categories_kfv
WHERE concatenated_segments = 'IPTV')
AND incidents.PROBLEM_CODE = pcodes.PROBLEM_CODE
AND incidents.INVENTORY_ITEM_ID NOT IN SELECT inventory_item_id
FROM apps.mtl_system_items_kfv
WHERE concatenated_segments = 'GENERAL_FAULTS_IPTV'
Regards,
Kranthi.

CIN - with TAXINJ and "condition based excise determination"

Dear All,
Can I use TAXINJ with "condition based excise determination" for CIN implemenation. We already have TAXINJ and some plants are already working on it.
If anyone already using the same, please share the problems faced / experience.
Actually I done settings for above scenario, but while GRN I am getting Message as " BED, AED and SED for the excise item is zero". And BED not getting populated while doing GRn.
I have created a tax code "C1" and assigned to company code.
THen I have maintained condition record for JMOP in FV11 for BED. ALso settings done J1ID.
PO is created with this tax code C1, taxes are getting calculated when
checked at Invoice tab at PO.
But while making GRN message comes "BED, AED and SED for the excise
item is zero" and excise values dont shows at excise tab in MIGO
Regards

Go through
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPLO/CIN+Configuration
and
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/09/ebf138cdd78a4be10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Hope you will get good idea

TAXINJ WITH CONDITION BASED CALCULATION

Hi MM Gurus
We are using TAXINJ procedure for tax calculation with formula base calculation (i.e. tax rates are maintains in J1ID ). As we now that TAXINJ procedure support both condition based and formula based tax calculation. But when I want to use the condition based tax calculation with TAXINJ by maintaining the condition record in FV11, I am getting the tax calculated with formula based only. System is ignoring the condition record maintain in FV11. So please explain how to use the TAXINJ procedure with condition based calculation by maintaining the condition record.
Reward point will be given please..
J K Patel
Ahmedabad
Gujarat

Hi JK,
if you r using taxinj, then system picks up the rate from J1ID only. if you want to maintain the condition records in FV11 then delete the rates in J1ID. hope this will solve your problem.
Regards,
patil

Reg. condition based receiver Determination

Hi,
    I need to send the records to two systems based upon the value
For Ex. All the material group record letz say (1,2,3,4,5,6) Shuld go to Receiver1 and only the records which belongs to material grp shud go to Receiver2.
I am trying using Condition based Receiver Determination
   For Receiver 1 :-
              I didnot give any condition.Coz all the records have to go to Reciver1.
   For Receiver 2 :-
                 I have written the condn in the Interface determination
            i.e) Material Group = 2.
But All the records are going to these two receivers.I have tried everything.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Anandan

Anandan,
Similar situation has worked for me. Please check the condition you have mention in Interface Determination.
In the Interface determination you need to have 2 inbound interfaces. Specify the respective condition for each inbound interface.
Example: if the Response field has the value as "Success" or "Failure" the message has to go to first interface. The message has to go to second interface only if the response is "Failure". so you can provided following condition in the interface determination:
<b>Condition 1:For first inbound interface</b> (/p1:MessageType/RecordSet/Response = F) OR (/p1:MT_RESPONSE_FROM_PS_BI/RS/Response = S)
<b>Condition 2:For second inbound interface</b> (/p1:MessageType/RecordSet/Response = F)
The above condition has worked for me. Hope this would be helpful to you.
Regards,
Sridhar

Condition based TAXINN -SD CIN

Hi Gurus,
Can any one provide me the SD -CIN - TAXINN configuration.
I can see lots of stuff on that....but not able to differentiate what is SD's and what is FI and MM's.
So please brief me Specific to SD CIN- Condition based configuration .
Thanks
Sasi

Hi Sasi,
Country Version India comes with four pricing procedures (TAXINN) as follows:
u2022 JINFAC (Sales from manufacturing plants)
u2022 JINEXP (Export sales)
u2022 JINDEP (Sales from depots)
u2022 JINSTK (Stock transfers)
TAXINJ & TAXINN are Tax Procedures in India. TAXINJ is old version & TAX INN is new version. Both has its own advantage & disadvantage.
Upto 4.6C & partially 4.7 version of SAP, TAXINJ was used. TAXINJ is formula based calculation, in which we maintain the tax rate in Tax Code itself. The implication is that if say we are having product range such that say Excise rate differes for separate chapter ID, VAT, CST & permutation & combination of these, we require that many Tax Codes. For example:
Tax Code: A1
Taxes: 16% Excise Duty + 2% Education Cess + 12% VAT
Tax Code: A2
Taxes: 16% Excise Duty + 2% Education Cess + 8% VAT
Tax Code: A3
Taxes: 12% Excise Duty + 2% Education Cess + 12% VAT
Tax Code: A3
Taxes: 12% Excise Duty + 2% Education Cess + 8% VAT
From 4.7 version onwards of SAP, TAXINN is being recommended & used. TAXINN is more user friendly & condition record based. In TAXINN, Tax Codes are statistical & of not much relevance, but are required to be maintained in condition record for taxes condition type. This makes Tax Codes simpler. The implication is that if say we are having product range such that say Excise rate differes for separate chapter ID, VAT, CST, we need not have the tax codes to that combination. For example:
Tax Code: A1
Can be used for any rate of excise duty, as tax code is only required to be maintained statistically in condition record.
Tax Code: A2
Can be used for any rate of VAT, as tax code is only required to be maintained statistically in condition record
Please Reward If Really Helpful,
Thanks and Regards,
Sateesh.Kandula

Condition Based Maintenance Plans

Dear All,
My client has the requirement of condition based maintenance plans without interfacing etc. An example is described below:
Compressor bearing has temperature limits of 70 deg C and 90 deg C. If measurement document reading is recorded outside the range specified here a maintenance call / maintenance order should be triggered.
Please give an example or process for the above dsicussed condition based maintenance plan upto two or three calls.
Thanks and Regards,
Saif Ali Momin

Hi,
As such there is no functionality directly. You can use the following user exits and can develop your on logic to trigger notification in case measured values are out of tolerance values.
IMRC0003 Menu exit - measurement document
As I remember there is sample code available for ythe same. You can check through SMOD transaction.

Activate or deactivate a condition based on Input Variable

Hi,
Is it possible to Activate/De activate a condition based on Input variable, if yes can any one tell me how this could be done...

Hi... Is there any other round about way other than using a User exit????
Basically this is what I am looking for
Quest to User: Y/N
if "Y" then Activate the condition and suppress the records based on the condition
If "N" then do not activate the condition and publish all the records...
Any thoughts....

Tax procedure condition based / formula based

Hi,
I have a query.
1.Based on tax procedure how we can identify that the tax procedure is formula based or condition based.
2.what are advantages over one another.
3.Is their any other way we can find out tax procedure attached to po is formula based / condition based.
4.What is sequence to create procedure and maintain record for these two procedure.
Thanks & Regards
Atharva G.

Hi Atharva,
I will list out the differences and advamtages between the two
TAX INJ procedure is formula based
TAX INN procedure is condition based
In TAX INJ to define the tax rates we are using excise tax rate in J1ID AND tax code ( FTXP)
In TAXINN nothing we are entering in tax code also , we are entering every duties in FV11( condition records)
Amending the duty rates is very easy in case of TAXINN than TAXINJ since we are mentioning the tax duties in FV11 through validity periods, if the tax rate is changed from that date we can maintain the record for the new period in FV11
IN TAXINN assign taxcode to company code is manadatory but its not manadatory in case of TAXINJ
Kindly get back to me, if you have any more clarifications.
Balakrishna R.V
Sonata Software Pvt Ltd.

Dist. of Header Condition based on the material Value

Hi All,
I have one query regarding the header Condition.i have selected the Calculation type as B - fixed amount (mandatory) for a particular Condition type and also selected the header and Item condition indicator.Now if the material have more than one line item then the system distributes this condition based on the quantities in PO.
My client requirement is that they want to have a header condition as we are using now. But they want to distribute this header condition according to the material values for each line items in a PO. please Mention that this condition is a fixed value (mandatory).
So, how can we make a Fixed Value (Calculation type) for a header condition to be distributed among the line items based on the base Value?
Please revert back asap.
Sure, points will be awarded for the same.

as explained earlier ,
system is distributes the header amount on the basic of value calculated by Basic X qty
e.g.
header value =100
two line item
1 is with Rs 4/- and qty is 10
2 is with Rs 10/- and qty is 15
so distribution is
Rs 21.05/- for 1st item
and
Rs 78.94/- for 2ed item
regards,
sujit

To modify a field in a database table based record identification by primar

hi
i want to to modify a field in a database table based record identification by primary key filed and two more fields
ie customer (primary key
i want to modify record from intenal table the record existing with primary key field customer
the status field needs to be mofied as " value rolled"
the below code is happening
loop at it_record into wa_Record
wa_inv-customer (primary key) = wa_Record=custome
wa_inv-date = wa_Record-date
...so one
append wa_inv to it_invest
clear wa_inv
endloop.
if not it_invest is initial
modify TABle1 ( this table is data base table which needs to be mofified) based on the primary key field
and also date field and status field which is not primary key.
regards
arora

Hi there.
Your requirement is to update a Z Database table from your internal table, right? You have several options:
LOOP AT it_invest INTO wa_inv.
UPDATE dbtable
     SET date = wa_inv-date
   WHERE prim_key = wa_inv-prim_key
     AND any_field = wa_inv-any_field.
ENDLOOP.
or
LOOP AT it_invest INTO wa_inv.
UPDATE dbtable FROM wa_inv. "if wa_inv of same type of dbtable
ENDLOOP.
In the first example, I wrote any field because you can update dbase table, filtering for fields that don't belong to the primary key. However, remember that you will change all records that respect the key you used (so, in your case, use the primary key).
Regards.
Valter Oliveira.

Condition Based Downpayment

Dear All,
We are using ECC 6.0 EHP5.0 with single instance worldwide, one controlling area, one global chart of account and one fiscal year for all company codes in SAP and for each company code we have 1:1 mapping to sales organization.
We are in process of implementing "Condition based Down payment" with conjunction with a billing Plan but the billing plans is not including any down payment items .
We followed the SAP best practices guide to setup the condition types and pricing procedure per the guide
http://help.sap.com/bp_retail603/BBLibrary/Documentation/732_BB_ConfigGuide_EN_US.doc
We followed the following process:
1. Created a regular Sales order with 2 items with a total value of say 5,000 GBP and entered a value for condition AZWA in the sales order header for 1,000 GBP
2. Entered a down payment for that amount (1,000 GBP) using t-code (F-29). In F-29 we entered the special G/L indicator = A (downpayment) and tried to reference the sales order number. However, the system gave error message u201CMessage no. V1125 - Enter the item numberu201D so we were forced to enter the payment at the line item level.
3. Created the invoice for this item and received the expected value in the AZWB pricing condition but the accounting document did NOT settle the down-payment amount per the value in AZWB.
We have the following questions:
1. How can we make the F-29 payment using only the sales order number (i.e. at the header levelu2026without the line item)? The SAP Help implies that this is possible. (http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/EN/dd/560e4b545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm) in the Down Payment Processing (Basis: Document Condition) section under u2018Incoming Paymentsu2019 it says u2018The system summarily posts the payment to the sales order number, not item-specificallyu2019. It then also says u2018Aside from this it is possible to post the incoming payment directly in the financial accounting (transaction F-29). The important thing here is that the financial accounting item contains a reference to the sales order number. It is also possible to post item-specific down payments.u2019
2. During Final Billing, how and we get the accounting document to settle the down-payment amount per the value in condition type AZWB. In the billing-plan process, the final billing settles the downpayment. We want the condition based final billing to act in a similar way and do not want to have to perform a manual downpayment settlement separately (via F-39).
Thank you in advance,
Vicki

Hi,
In the billing plan Billing rule should be maintained as "4" or "5" which indicates that line is down payment. Assign down payment request for this Billing plan item.
What is the billing document type you have used for the invoicing?
Check if Billing category is "P = Down payment request"
When a down payment request is created it will process only dowm payments.
In F-29 system will process only those docuements which are identified as Down payment request.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Sharan

Create a condition based on a select

Hi, I have the necessity to create a condition, inside a report, based on a select, for example (when I build a condition):
Item: "Item (RUO)".Description
Condition: IN
Values: select item_description from ISUPP_LOV_RUO_SLA_PRODUCTS_V -> 3 values
How can I dynamically pass these 3 values to the condition, without using hard coded strings as 'A','B','C' ??
Thanks
Alessandro

Hi,
If you are using Discoverer Desktop then you can create a condition based on a subquery. You create worksheet that returns those 3 rows then create the condition where then item is in the first worksheet.
If you are Discoverer Plus then you will have to join the folders in the EUL. So you create a folder for ISUPP_LOV_RUO_SLA_PRODUCTS_V and join it to the report folder using "Item (RUO)".Description = ISUPP_LOV_RUO_SLA_PRODUCTS_V.item_description .
Rod West

Condition Based Interface Determination in ICO (AAE) - PI 7.1 EHP1

Hi Friends,
We have PI 7.1 EHP1 - SP 04.
In our scenario, we have 1 outbound interface and 2 inbound interface. Based on condition, it needs to select the first inbound interface or second inbound interface.
In the normal configuration, we are able to select. (By click + icon and add condition in the Receiver Interfaces in Interface Determination Step)
When we create configuration using ICO (Integrated Configuration), there is no option in "Receiver Interfaces" Tab to add two inbound interfaces with condition.
Could you please clarify how do we do this in ICO?
Kind regards,
Jegathees P.

IMHO, condition based interface determination is not possible in ICO.
Use Multiple inbound service interfaces... You can handle in design level .. ESR level.
Check the Abhishek's blog... This might be helpful.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/90dcc6f4-0829-2d10-b0b2-c892473f1571?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Note: Since in your case you need two receiver agreements, you cannot handle through ICO. The above link might be helpful to do multimapping without BPM.
Edited by: Baskar Gopal on Apr 26, 2011 9:53 AM

Conditions based on "EnvelopSender" in Content Filters

When defining Content Filters, I need to define conditions based on the sender of an email. For example, if the sender is Jim or John, and Subject Line contains a tag [CONFIDENTIAL], the action should be to encrypt the mesasge.
I realize this could easily be done using LDAP groups. But my problem is that for a number of opertaional reasons I cannot connect our IronPort to our corp LDAP.
An alternative is to directly code the user names in the condition statement. This is ugly and problematic for admins and possibly causes other problems as the number of users grows. Could anyone suggest an alternative?
Is there any option of having the Condition statement open a file and read the "sender" names from the file maintained somewhere on the local or a remote disk? Any other option?
Thanks.

I would suggest looking at creating a dictionary that would list the addresses of the individuals. You can use that dictionary from which to base your planned action. Using LDAP is by far the better option for keeping a list up to date, as the dictionary will need to be updated regularly as addresses change, added or removed.

Condition based records sent to proxy

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for