Condition category u00B4u00B4du00B4u00B4 Confirmed purchase net price/value

Hi ,
I have created new condition with condition category ´´d´´ Confirmed purchase net price/value.
I dont know if this kind of condition needs access sequence-If yes which one?
Which routine to assign in pricing procedure?
Thanks in advance and best regards
L

No it is not required. See the SAP explanation for this
If the vendor confirms a price via EDI, the system inserts the
price in the condition type with category d.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Similar Messages

Sales order - net price value - what table

In what table is stored the Net Price Value (Sales order item level, Conditions tab, column Amount, name Net price Value ( structure KOMV-KBETR)
Thanks.

Hello,
You have to check KONV with Condition record no = VBAK-KNUMV.
Then match the line item number with KONV-KPOSN to get all the price conditions for each item (Note KINAK = space will get only active price conditions)
If you need the total sum of amount for all line items then you can check VBAP-NETWR.
Hope this helps,
Regards
Shiva

Debit memo with negative net price value

Hi experts.
Can you help me ?
I have a debit memo process and its net price value is negative.
Return's flag isn't checked in customizing (VOV7).
Thanks a lot !
Renato

Hello,
if the order type (VBAK-VBTYP = 'K') for a debit memo request, then the returns flag should be set to 'X' in the maintainance of the item type (transaction VOV7).
the sign will be reversed in fv45pfop_preisfindung_
if the flag is set.
I hope that the information are helpful.
Regards
Claudia
If you are satisfied with the answer, please give Reward Points.

Purchase net price condition - Upper, lower limit!

Hi SAPients,
Please help me on this one.
While creating a PO, I want the system to throw an error when the net price entered in the PO is 10% more or 20% less than the price I have maintained in the Purchasing info record. Is there a way of configuring this somehow? Any other work around or suggestions also welcome. Thank you!
Thanks and regards,
Arun

Hi Arun,
I think you might have a couple of options here:
1,Check out T-code OLME   > condition   >define price
determination   > define limits
However here you are required to give a unit of measure, if in a info
record which has a different unit of measure than here, then the price
variance check will not performed,
Perhaps, you may insert several entries for PB00 but with different unit
of measures
once the price in info record (me12)exceed the variance limit, error
message VK 038 will appear .
2.IMG   >MM-Purchasing >PO >Set Tolerance Limits for Price Variance.
Here you can maintain the varaince limit then in me21n the effective
price will be checked against the valuation price in mm03, if it exceed
the tolerence, Effective price higher than material price will be issued,
However,this check will not perform directly in the me12
it will be checked in me21n later.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Adam.

Programme RM06INP0 is NOT updaing Net price value at in ME13 screen in ECC

Hi Experts ,
We are on ECC 6.04 with SRM 7. We are using PIR as one of the SoS in Shopping cart in Classic scenario.
When we are running the programme RM06INP0 in ECC in foreground /background to update the Net price field ( NETPR), but it is only updating at value at Table Level ( EINE-NETPR) and NOT at Screen Level ( or sometimes it update at Screens level)
It does not affecting any functionality in ECC or SRM, since system propose the Price from EINE-NETPR for PIR in SoS in SRM Shopping Cart & from last PO in ECC PO in ME21N , but user do NOT able to able to see the Price in ME13 ( Display Pur. Info Record)
Can anyone please suggest what should be the issue ?
Thank you .
NAP

Thanks Patilmallinath .
I saw below information for this programe in "i" in SE38
Short text
Price Determination for Purchasing Info Records
The report calculates the current prices of the info records and (if desired) updates the latter with the results.
Description
For each info record that satisfies the criteria set out in the initial screen, this report calculates the new net and effective prices from the currently valid conditions.
If there is a variance from the prices stored in the info record, the new prices can be adopted in the info record.
If there are no valid conditions, the prices in the relevant info records are not changed.
Requirements
The Test run indicator determines whether the new prices are to be adopted in the info records:
'X' -> the report does not update the info records with the new prices;
' ' -> the report updates the info records with the new prices.
Output
The report generates a list containing only those info records in respect of which the newly calculated prices differ from those of the info record. Included in the output are the old and the new prices.
and according to it it should update the Net Price in the Screen. Well, issue is 'Not updating the Price'...it is updating price at table level...but not at screen level...manytimes...
Can you/anyone please suggest on this ?
Regards
NAP

Problem with updating net price value through PORDCH Idoc

Hi All,
I have a ABAP program which calls the function module BAPI_PO_CHANGE to update the line item details using an idoc.
During this change it is updating Limit values in PO bot not the net price.
And the Idoc status is having message as BAPI Change has been done successfully instead of "PO number changed".
Any suggestions to solve this issue.
Thanks,
Spandana

Please post the details of the application release, database version and OS.
Please see these MOS docs.
Getting "ORA-20001: The primary key specified is invalid" Error Using HR_ASSIGNMENT_API.UPDATE_EMP_ASG_CRITERIA API [ID 737145.1]
APP-PAY-07220: The primary key specified is invalid - ERROR Received Creating GRE/Legal Entity In New Business Group [ID 849754.1]
Error Occurs While Hiring Applicants APP-PAY-07220: The Primary Key Specified Is Invalid [ID 1084464.1]
Terminated Employee Scorecards Error's: Ora-20001: The Primary Key Specified Is Invalid [ID 859315.1]
Hr_assignment_api.Update_emp_asg_criteria Gives Ora-20001, Ora-06512 [ID 334491.1]
PERWSTEM Termination 'APP-PAY-07220 The Primary key specified is invalid' and Database 11.1.0.7.0 [ID 1263357.1]
Error 'APP-PAY-07220: Primary Key Specified Is Invalid' When Attempting to Process Open Life Event [ID 567224.1]
Republishing Performance Management Plan (PMP) Fails with Error: ORA-20001: The primary key specified is invalid [ID 956234.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

2lis_02_itm is not extracting net price value

Hi All,
The standard data source 2lis_02_itm is not extracting the NETPR( NET PRICE ) data from table EKPO-NETPR. The values existing in the table varies with the extracted data. Did any body face the same issue? please tell us the reason for this?Any sap note be applied .
Please suggest...please revert back..points awarded for the valid answers.
Thanks,
Joseph
Edited by: joseph reddy on Feb 15, 2010 5:55 PM

Hello Joseph & Ravi,
I've found the reason for the difference in the value of NETPR in the extractor by reading SAP Note 670313 (http://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/670313).
To solve the issue, we've set up a user exit extracting the value from the table (EKPO-NETPR) and connecting this to the infoobject in BW instead of the value provided by the extractor.
Kind regards,
Ben

How to arrive net price value per unit

Hi gurus
pls help me to arrive NET SALE VALUE PER UNIT
MRP PER UNIT using key figures in POSDM and SAP R3.
Pls help sure i will assign full points
thanks in advance
regards
rajesh

Dear Rajesh,
In such scenarios you can make use of Aggregation functionality in query designer.
To have an idea how to use this aggregation functionality go through this url
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/82/f2dc37f0f12313e10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm]
In this scenario exception aggregation is most usefil
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/d2/e0173f5ff48443e10000000a114084/frameset.htm]
I hope this helps you.
Revert for any doubts
Regards,
RK

Condition category in v/06

Hi,
in v/06, maitaining the condition types, there are so many options of condition category.
Has any one got the document of all those options of condition category....
rdgs

Hi Chandresh,
A classification of conditions according to pre-defined categories (for example, all conditions that relate to freight costs,Tax, Price etc.,
Based on the condition type this will be selected in the Condition as per the client Req.
$     TaxJurCode trigger (without license check KNVL)
+     Tax exemption license via conditions
-     Total charges (only IS-OIL)
0      Charges - condition records (only IS-OIL)
1     Tax JurDic level 1 (with license check KNVL)
2     Tax JurDic level 2
3     Tax JurDic level 3
4     Tax JurDic level 4
5     Customer reserve 5
6     Customer reserve 6
7     Customer reserve 7
8     Customer reserve 8
9     Customer reserve 9
A     Packaging
B     Delivery costs
C     Insurance
D     Tax
E     Cash discount
F     Freight
G     Cost
H     Basic price
I     Price for intercompany billing
J     Customer expected price / customer value (excl.tax)
K     Base amount excluding tax
L     Generally new when copying
M     Sales tax w/license-checking (VAT)
N     Input Tax not Deductible
O     Variants
P     Base amount including tax
Q     Costing
R     Invoice list condition
S     Standard cost
T     Moving cost
U     Discount/surcharge for precious metals
V     Price component
W     Expected sales price (including tax)
X     Customer reserve X
Y     Customer reserve Y
Z     Customer reserve Z
a     Reserved (fixed extra pay)
b     Transfer Price for Group Valuation
c     Transfer price for profit centers
d     Confirmed purchase net price/value
e     Down payment request/down payment clearing
f     Free goods - inclusive
g     Payment
h     Profit Center Cost
i     Ship & Debit 1 (IBU HiTec)
j     Ship & Debit 2 (IBU HiTec)
l     TP-ILV: Base Tarif That Covers Costs
m     SSR Discount (only IS-Oil)
n     Profit Center Internal Price (Route)
o     AFS Season Determination
p     SSR Partner Commission (only IS-OIL)
&     AFS Value-Added Services
Please Reward If Really Helpful,
Thanks and Regards,
Sateesh.Kandula

PIR net price not follow the condition screen

Hi all,
I have a question regarding my pricing condition maintained in a PIR.
In one of my PIR record, there is two validity line records in the pricing condition with the following date range and value:
1 - 2008.04.01 to 2010.12.31 ==> PB00 is USD853,00/1 PC
2 - 2011.01.01 to 2999.12.31 ==> PB00 is USD853,00/1 PC
However, the strange thing is that in the Purchasing Org screen in the PIR, the NET price value is "879,00 per 1pc" even with the VALID-TO field value as "2999.12.31".
May I know why the the Net price in this view not picking up the USD853? Something go wrong in the PIR?
(in between the Pr Date Category is 2-delivery date).
Please help.
tuff

Hi Jurgen,
I am still a little bit confuse as of why in the Purchasing Org screen in the PIR, the NET price value is "879,00 per 1pc" even with the VALID-TO field value as "2999.12.31".
Question1-
Shouldn't the above field automatically pick-up what is maintained in the condition screen of the most latest pricing record which is the USD853,00 for the second line item I described previously?
Question2 -
What have caused the 879,00 being inserted into the Purchasing Org screen in the PIR, the NET price field? where is this USD879,00 coming from??
Thanks and please help.
Tuff

Net price update in creation of the purchase order

Guys,
I have a query, please find the details below.
I have created a ABAP for posting the purchase orders using the BAPI function 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1', I am passing the net price value in the input file. But the system is taking the net price from the purchase info record of that material. My own net price is not considered.
Please find my observations below.
1. First of all system is checking whether there is a PIR maintained for the material or not. If PIR is maintained, then system is defaultly considering the net price maintained in the PIR.
2. Later I have deleted the net price maintained in PIR. In this case, system is considering the net price of that material from the previous purchase order.
But my query is that I don't want the system to consider the net price from previous material, I want to update my own net price to line item of the PO.
Could anyone please suggest me how should I proceed further so solve this query?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Vijaymadhur.

Hi,
Yes, this can be achieved. Don't maintain any price in inforecord. Then in SPRO > Materials Management > Purchasing > Environment Data > Define default value for buyers > Here click on settings on default values > In Inforecord update > Maintain no update fro PO and quotation.
Now the last PO price will not be saved in Inforecord and hence this will not b carried to PO.
Regards,
Prabu

Very Urgent--Adding Header condition amount in Net order value of PO

Dear friends,
Our client has following requirement.
---In Purchase order ,Header conditions related to delivery costs are using.
--Currently when we add the header condition,that amount is not adding to the Net order value and not adding to the total value in the PO print document.But proportionaly distributing to the line items.
--Because of this two problems one is not adding to net order so not considered for release strategy,secondas it is not adding in the net order value,header condition amount also is not coming in the total value in the print out.
--Currently, this header amount is splitting and posting seperate line item for GR/IR clearing act in MIGO and MIRO..
I have removed the Statistical tick and accrual tick in IMG, then header amount is adding to the Net order value and adding in the total value in the PO print. But in MIGO/MIRO, This amount is adding to the GR/IR clearing act ,instead of seperate GR/IR line item in MIGO/MIRO documents, But client wants the postings shall be made similar to previous one.
I have checked with removing only Stastical key and not removing the accrual key.But header condition is not adding to Net order value. I have searched for User exits/BAdis,suitable are not found.
How the Header condition amount can be added to the Net order value without removing the Statistical key in IMG.Are there any User exit/BAdis,
Please suggest.
Regards,
Dayanand

Dear Sairam,
Thanks for your reply.
Asper your suggestions i tried as follows.
1) We have got condition types like surcharges/discounts before "Net inc dis"
and Delivery costs/accruals/frieghts after "Net inc dis".
2) My requirement is that whatever conditions types after Net inc dis like Del costs/Frieghts are not included in Net order value in PO,so amount is not included in Release strategy and print.Currently this amount is coming as seperate line itemGR/IR Clearing account in MIGO/MIRO.
3) Asper your suggestion,i tried with Surcharge condition existing before "Net inc Disc"--This is a header condition(Cond.cat is Insurance),but stastical tick is not there in Scema. I tried as it is ,amount is adding in Net order value.But seperate line item for this amount is not coming in MIGO/MIRO
4) When i ticked the accrual key and statistical tick and added Accrual-FR1,then PO created ,amount is not adding in Net order value.
5) When i removed only Stastical tick only even though amount is not adding.
6) When i removed the Accrual tick also i.e both the ticks then only amount is adding in Net order value.But Line item of the header condition is not dispalying as a seperate line item in MIGO/MIRO
For these Header conditions ,seperate line item shall come ,at the same time amount shall add in Net order Vaue for the purpose of including in the amount for Release strategy and print.
Please suggest how to do it.
Regards,
Dayanand

Po with zero net price

Dear Experts,
How to set 100% discount or free of charge item category to allow zero net price?
Thanks & B.Regards

Dear Tam,
SAP does not allow -
1. Invoice receipt with free goods indicator ticked hence you can not enter delivery cost.
2. Net value in PO to be zero if free goods indicator is not ticked hence you can not have 100% discount.
You need to findout work around to capture delivery cost in material account for delivery charges paid to vendor on material delivered free.
One of the option could be.
1. Create a PO for free goods with Free goods delivery indicator on.
2. Do goods receipt of free goods.
3. Create MIRO without PO and debit the account of material with delivery cost.
Note- Material tab is visiable in MIRO if you have activated direct posting to material account in SPRO.
SPRO - > Mat Mgmt - > LIV -> Incoming Invoice -> Activate Direct Posting to G/L Accounts and Material Accounts
Hope this may work for you.

Function Module for calculation of the net price of a configurable material

Hi,
I would like to know if a function module allows to calculate the purchasing /net price of a configurable material at a vendor and at a requested delivery date before the creation of a purchasing order.
For configurable materials, we have no PIR and no moving / standard price thus the valuation price in the PR is blank.
I would like to fill in the field "valuation price" in the PR with the net price we can find in the PO.
However the PR is created before the PO.
Thanks a lot in advance for yours reply.
regards,

hi Pravenn,
I don't know about these functions, but u can try anything like this:
data:
strdate like sy-datum value '20070901',
      enddate like sy-datum value '20070909',
      date(10),
      moddate(1).
date = enddate - strdate + 1.
moddate = date mod 7.
date = date div 7.
if moddate <> 0.
date = date + 1.
endif.
write: / date.
Regards
Allan Cristian
Message was edited by:
        Allan Cristian

Set up condition category h profit center cost

Today we have ZPRS with condition category G. It posts the same value to FI and PCA. We want FI to post cost with material ledger 10 Company code currency and PCA to post with material ledger 12 Profit center valuation. SAP says to have a condition with condition category h. When I put it into my price procedure I get an error The group transfer account has not been defined.
How do I set up pricing to post Company code currency in FI and Profit center valuation in PCA.

Hi,
Cost center is defined as per requirement, In your scenerio cost center will be department wise like different product dept for example Desktop, hardware accessories, laptops etc.. So, every cost cenet should be assigned to profit center. As per reporting related to cost center and profit center both report has it own advantages like cost center is purely related to cost of the particular department wheras profit center is related to both cost and revenue, it is broad prospective related to profit or loss made for that particular profit center.
Regards,
Sreekanth

Condition category u00B4u00B4du00B4u00B4 Confirmed purchase net price/value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for