Condition Definition Logic group/alone

Hi All,
can some one help me to understand the logic for condition definition within one query .........
1 - one condition with different parameter........
Exmp...
Within one condition 1
Parameter 1 -- Amount <
                2 -- balance =>
2 - two different condition......
Exmp ..
   condition 1 -- amount <
                 2 -- balance =>
Regards
SSMS
Edited by: SSMS on Nov 20, 2008 5:24 PM

SAP's detailed explanation on Conditions -
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/43/b57138c1afbd20e10000009b38f889/content.htm
Abhijit

Similar Messages

Non-system wide DNS Lookups on RBL (i.e. logical groups supported)

Sun Java System Messaging Server documetation seems to state that RBL filtering can only exist in one of three files that are used for filtering based off of inbound connection IP address. My question is, can conditional execution occur for a section of one of these files based of destination e-mail address?
I'd like to have multipule levels of e-mail filtering using RBL and allow users to be assinged to the level of filtering they desire by joining a logical group which will enable a level of RBL filtering for that logical group.
Any help is greatly appreciated, as far as I can see, I can only have one system wide filtering set, so I can't possibly have one set of e-mail ids using 10 RBL (remote black lists) and another group e-mail ids using a smaller set of RBLs.
======= From the documentation =======
MAIL_ACCESS : Used to block incoming connections based on combined information found in SEND_ACCESS and PORT_ACCESS tables: that is, the channel and address information found in SEND_ACCESS combined with the IP address and port number information found in PORT_ACCESS.
ORIG_MAIL_ACCESS : Used to block incoming connections based on combined information found in ORIG_SEND_ACCESS and PORT_ACCESS tables: that is, the channel and address information found in ORIG_SEND_ACCESS combined with the IP address and port number information found in PORT_ACCESS.
PORT_ACCESS : Used to block incoming connections based on IP number.
====================================

Alas, the RBL stuff is done before iMS even knows who the message is addressd to. That stuff is done at the initial connection phase, as our philosophy is to reject a message just as soon as possible . . .
After the message is accepted, then you can opt-in/out for things like spamassassin, brightmail, etc.

Logical Groups in GRC-AC

Dear Experts,
We are using business role concept.Only business roles are assigned and not technical roles.
Requirement is To assign business role from GRC Prod system to ECC DEV and ECC QA also apart from ECC Prod.
To do so we have a logical group SAP_R3_LG mapped to ECC Prod for all action 1,2,3 and 4. Do I need to create other 2 logical groups mapped to ECC DEV and QA respectively.
Also I believe we need to create different business role name for QA and DEV system .
Appreciate your thoughts on this...
Thanks,
Mamoon

Hi Mamoon,
First of all, you need to create unique connector groups per each connectors in order to create/maintain the roles in the backend systems. Then you need to map the connector in the corresponding connector groups.
In BRM, you can have only one system as default connector and this would not let you to maintain the roles in case you have to use multiple connectors for role maintenance.
Make sure to define the integration scenarios for each connectors individually.
Hope this would help.
Regards,
Ameet

Creation of logic group - any limitation for the Criteria Value Field?

I am trying to create simple logic groups in FDM (version 11.1.1.3 and 11.1.2.1). However, an error message displayed in the information bar.
Error: Error adding new record.
Detail: Data access error.
I clicked the "Add" button and created a logic group which contains *1,520* non-sequential source accounts in the Criteria Value Field (with In operator).
I have separated these source accounts with a comma and no spaces in between them. (Note: Operator = x, Value/Exp = 1, Seq = 0) I updated the grid. Then, the error message was displayed and the logic group creation was failed.
And then, I created a new logic group which contains only *100* non-sequential source accounts in the Criteria Value Field (with In operator).
I also separated them with a comma, no spaces and same setting. I updated the grid. And the logic group was added successfully.
Each source account contains 10 characters (alphabet and/or number).
I want to ask:
1. Is there any limitation in specifying source accounts (i.e.. no more than certain number of source accounts for each logic group) in the Criteria Value Field when creating simple logic group?
2. I am adding these logic groups by clicking the "Add" button one by one, is there faster way to do it (i.e.. upload an excel or csv file or source accounts specified)?
Thank you very much!

Thank you Expert for your reply!
I would like to ask about loading the Logic Accounts with the template.
As instructed, I exported the excel out for the template format and updated the template with new Logic Accounts. Then, I imported the excel file in the "Import XLS" section under Tools. The excel file was uploaded successfully. (Note: I am using excel 2010 and saved it as .xls file)
However, there is no changes in the Logic Accounts and seem no updates was made.
I want to ask:
1. Did I import the excel at the right location (i.e. "Import XLS" section under Tools)?
2. Is there anything else I need to do after the file has been imported (i.e. delete the existing logic accounts or click another button(?) for this change) so the new list of logic accounts would become effective?
I would like to use excel to maintain my list of logic accounts for better control in the future.
Thanks in advance!

Logical grouping of dimensions

Hi,
What is criteria to enter dimension into the cube and what does mean by logical grouping of dimensions
Thanks in advance
krish

Hi,
While designing the dimensions, you must ask to yourself that "What will be the size of dimension table if I add this characteristic to this dimension?".The smaller ratio of size of dimension table/ fact table means better performance.For this ratio, 20% is dangerous and 10% is preffered.
If the characteristics included in one dimension have mxn relationship, then your dimension table will be too big(specially if those charactersitics are already big) and performance will be decreased.Therefore, 2 characteristics that have mxn relationship(e.g sales document and sales document item) must be in seperate dimensions i.e two characteristics that have nx1 relationship(e.g material and material group) may be put into one dimension(Not logically related(groupped) characteristics, this is not a criteria)Two characteristics that have nx1 relationship in one dimension will add only m+n rows to dimension table instead of mxn.To sum up, you must create the dimensions by considering the relationships of characteristics that will be included in the cube.I propose you to activate some SAP cubes(e.g 0FIAR_C03) from BI content to view their dimensions.You can see the logic there.
You can see the size of dimension table and fact table by executing the program SAP_INFOCUBE_DESIGNS in se38.
Useful threads:
Regards,
Güneş

In 10.2 docucorp, how to add a manual condition for a group

Hi,
I've grouped some faps in 10.2 by applying groupbegin and group end rules. Can I add a common manual condition for this group in 10.2?
Thanks,
Sai krishna

Hi Sai krishna,
No, sorry can't do it. The ability to add a "common" trigger to a group of faps appeared in release 11.3, when the concept of sub-forms was first introduced.
Gaétan

Logical Grouping of ProfitCenter/CostCenter Records

Hi,
I have this scenario where in I got a set of records in the cube which consists ProfitCenter/Cost Center combinations.
ProfitCenter is a Hierarchy.
Now I need to create a set of logical groups (called Divisions) from these set of combinations.
Client had asked us to hardcode this.
Is this the only viable solution?
I can send the sample file (which represents the ProfitCenter/CostCenter combination) if someone needs more clarity.
Thanks,
Manesh

Hi Manesh,
You can always create the logical grouping for Divisions in BW in a hierarchical format. But when the structure changes you would have to manually update the same every time.
If the hierarchy were maintained in a source system like R/3 it would always be possible to extract the latest version, reducing manual intervention. I would say a preferable way.
But you would need to check whether the standard datasource for Profit center hierarchy in R/3 supports
cost center assignment also. If not then creating the same in BW seems to be the only option I can think of.
Hope it helps.

Exporting and Importing Logic groups

Hello, I am creating a logic group that is quite long in my UAT application, but once it works properly I need to have it aslo in my Production application, However I don't fancy recreating the 95 lines of complex logic.
Is there a way to export the Logic group from the UAT and import them in the Prod ?
Many thanks foryour ideas
Lionel

There is an Export/Import command in the File menu. I have only used it for the entire app, but there is probably a way to just do pieces.

[svn:fx-trunk] 12795: Resolving race condition with interdependent Group properies alpha and blendMode .

Revision: 12795
Revision: 12795
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-12-10 09:56:11 -0800 (Thu, 10 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
Resolving race condition with interdependent Group properies alpha and blendMode.
QE notes: None
Doc notes: None
Bugs: SDK-24636
Reviewer: Deepa
Tests run: Checkin
Is noteworthy for integration: No
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-24636
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/components/Group.as

Simple logic group to operate prior to custom import script?

Hi all,
Thanks for taking the time to read my question. I will gladly mark this thread as helpful or answered if you can help me. I'm a novice at FDM so please bear with.
I have a custom import script that assigns ICP None to a specific account (overriding any ICP detail). However, now I need the ICP detail for that account in a second statistical account. I setup a simple logic group to create the logic account that I can map to the statistical but then realized that the import script runs prior to the logic group so I lose all ICP detail in the logic account as well.
Is there a way to run the logic group prior to import script or is there a better way to accomplish what I'm trying to do?
I'm not sure how critical this is but I'm using FDM v11.1.1.3.01 adapter 11x-G5-C
Edited by: user4591089 on Aug 17, 2011 2:10 PM
Edited by: user4591089 on Aug 17, 2011 2:50 PM

Do the following:
1) Remove the custom import script.
2) Create a complex logic account and override the ICP dimension in the Group By Column with the Value [ICP None]. This will then be what is diplayed on the import screen for this logic account.
3) Map the original source as the statistical account and the logic account as appropriate
Edited by: SH on Aug 18, 2011 9:48 AM

Adding conditions to current-group()

First of all I want to thank all the experts out there who read these boards and help folks like myself figure it out. I'm new to this and sort of testing the waters for my clients (our first report was implemented last week!), so there are no local experts. Your help is greatly appreciated.
Now to my new question. For my second report I'm trying to create something a little more dynamic. I'm moving all of my totalling and grouping from the data definition to the template. I have a large set of records all returned by a single query. The records have a field called 'Report'. The field contains either a 1 or a 2 depending on where in the template the records should be displayed.
This is a few lines from my template to give you an idea of what I'm dealing with...the tabs don't show but hopefully I've labelled it well enough that you can see what I'm trying to achieve.
<?for-each-group:G_REPORT;./PAGEBREAK_SEG?>
<?for-each-group:current-group();./SECOND_SEG?>
<?for-each-group:current-group();./THIRD_SEG?>
**new condition***
     <?for-each-group:current-group();./CAT3?>
     <?for-each-group:current-group();./ACCOUNT_SEG?>
     <?ACCOUNT_SEG?>
     <?ACCOUNT_DESC?>
     <?APRIL?>
          <?end for-each?>--END ACCOUNT_SEG
     <?CAT3_DESC?>
     <?sum (APRIL)?>
     <?end for-each?>
**end of new condition***
--records where report=2 will be displayed here
<?split-by-page-break:?><?end for-each?> --ENDS THIRD_SEG
<?split-by-page-break:?><?end for-each?>--ENDS SECOND_SEG
<?split-by-page-break:?><?end for-each?> --ENDS PAGEBREAK_SEG
What I'd like to do is add another condition based on the value of 'Report'. If the report field is '1' I want to go ahead and group the records as indicated above. If the report field is '2' I want to skip over the records. Those records will be displayed later in the template.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thank you.

Hi
The best approach will be to use an XPATH expression. there is a primer on the XPATH standard in the BIP docs, check it out.
At its most simple its a way to introduce an if statement into your template e.g. loop over these rows of data if the document type is INVOICE, this would be <?for-each:ROW[DOC_TYPE='INVOICE']
You will be able to use the same command structure for your data. There was not a Report field (element) in your example below but you can use
<?for-each:current-group()[Report='1']?>
this will only show the rows where Report = 1, conversely
<?for-each:current-group()[Report !='1']?>
shows every row where Report does not equal 1.
Give it a try, if you get stuck, some XML data and the structure of the template will help to help you
Regards
Tim

Conditional script logic based on total value...

Hi Experts,
I have a consolidation rule scenario below wherein I have to apply the following logic since it's not possible to check the sign of data using automatic adjustment business rules.
If Investment > Share Capital record difference in Goodwill
If Share Capital > Investment record difference in RE
To simplify things since it's hard to track which Entity is active under the selected consolidation group, what I want now is to simply get the result under 9_CONSO for Elim Control since the sign convention is consistent for the elim entries. Say if TOTAL is positive then I'll record the data in RE else Goodwill. I already have a work in progress code but still I'm having a hard time getting the total. hope you could help me regarding this.
          11_UPLOAD     11_UPLOAD     22_CAPI          22_INVS          9_CONSO
          ENTITY_A     ENTITY_B     ENTITY_B     ENTITY_A     TOTAL
Share Capital     1,500          -1,500
RE
Elim Control                         1,500          -2000          -500
Goodwill
Investment     2000                              -2,000
Current Script:
*XDIM_MEMBERSET GROUPS = %GROUPS_SET%
*XDIM_MEMBERSET TIME = %TIME_SET%
*XDIM_MEMBERSET CATEGORY = %CATEGORY_SET%
*XDIM_MEMBERSET ACCOUNT = 0003100010
*WHEN DATASRC
*IS "22_CAPI"
*REC(EXPRESSION=(%VALUE% > ([ACCOUNT].[0001300010],[DATASRC].[22_INVS])? %VALUE%*-1:0),ACCOUNT="0001201010")
*REC(EXPRESSION=(%VALUE% < ([ACCOUNT].[0001300010],[DATASRC].[22_INVS])? %VALUE%*-1:0),ACCOUNT="0003300020")
*ENDWHEN
*COMMIT
*XDIM_MEMBERSET GROUPS = %GROUPS_SET%
*XDIM_MEMBERSET TIME = %TIME_SET%
*XDIM_MEMBERSET CATEGORY = %CATEGORY_SET%
*XDIM_MEMBERSET ACCOUNT = 0001300010
*WHEN DATASRC
*IS "22_INVS"
*REC(EXPRESSION=(%VALUE% < ([ACCOUNT].[0003100010],[DATASRC].[22_INVS])? %VALUE%*-1:0),ACCOUNT="0001201010")
*REC(EXPRESSION=(%VALUE% > ([ACCOUNT].[0003100010],[DATASRC].[22_INVS])? %VALUE%*-1:0),ACCOUNT="0003300020")
*ENDWHEN
*COMMIT
Thanks in advance,
Marvin

Hi Marvin,
In Consolidation, under a specific group/sub group, always there will be only one entity which will hold the method 90 (group parent) and where you suppose to post all these Goodwilll or Capital Reserve. If not, please explain your scenario.
You can also run validation after consolidation logic to post the negative amount in CR.
I hope this will help.
Anil

IIF condition mdx logic in Dimension security

Hi,
I have Organization dimension which has multiple attributes like District , Region, Corporate.
I want to show all date for Corporate users, region users to see only their region data and district users to see only their district data.
Users can be either Corporate , Regional or District user. Only one of these attributes will be True.
I have to implement this logic in dimension security of Organization dimension under advanced tab using IIF conditions. I am getting confused , can some one help
Logic will be -
For Current Logged In User - Check if Corporate Flag is set
*True - Show all Organization Members
*False - Check if Region No is set
*True - Show Organization with Region number equal to current user Region number
*False - Check if District No is set
    *True - Show Organization with District number equal to current user Distric number *False - Show all Organization members (mostly ESTAT case)

1. If the MDX query worked, I would assume that you have a valid member expression in the "Region Number" property. It should be something like [Region].[Region Number].[Reg1]. If you just have "Reg1" in the property, you will have to change the MDX like
below:
strtoset( "{" + "[Region].[Region Number].[" +
strtoMember("[User].[Login Id].[smv123]").Properties( "Region
Number" ) + "]" + "}" )
(a).
strtoMember("[User].[Login Id].[smv123]") will convert member string expression to a member. Same as
[User].[Login Id].[smv123]").Properties( "Region
Number" ). i.e. Quotes are gone.
(b).
[User].[Login Id].[smv123]").Properties( "Region
Number" ) will return as string "Reg1"
(c) "Reg1" is added to "[Region].[Region Number].[" to make a valid member expression. Complete expression would be : "[Region].[Region Number].[" + "Reg1" + "]"
(d) The above member string expression is converted to a member set by
strtoset( "{" + "[Region].[Region Number].[" + "Reg1" + "]" + + "}" )
(e) So, it is equivalent specifying [Region].[Region Number].[Reg1] in the Advanced security tab. But, since the MDX is evalauted at run time, it will change based on the login id returned by the UserName() function.
(f) Please make sure that you picked [Region] dimension and [Region Number] attribute to enforce dynamic security
2. I am not sure how to write IIF logic in the advanced tab of dimension security. It may be possible. The end result of the MDX in the advanced tab should be a valid member or member set.
regards
Arun

Maintaining pricing condition with field group

Hi
I want to check the linkage between condition maintenance table for pricing with the Contract.
Can any body tell me how to maintain the pricing condition with the field group of Contract.(provide me the detail path)
I am getting one error"Internal error in condition maintenance" when i click on product tab for any of contracts.
So I guess it may be due to any linkage failure between condition table and field group or tabstrip. please tell me how could I proceed forward to check this error.
Thanks

Hi, I hope that this linck to serve.
[condition fields table|condition fields table]
Cordial greetings.

Need ability to group forums into logical groups as a user.

As heavy reader & contributor of the CRM forums, there are getting to be so many forums it is difficult to look through and assist on so many column headings. Plus I believe the more novice users frequently submit their question in the wrong forum.
I would love to group (Personalize) these topics to see all new post or limit my searches to these forums. It is still o.k. if I post a question to where it has to be in a specific forum.
Customer Relationship Management (CRM) - General & Framework
CRM Webclient UI
CRM Web Channel E-Commerce, E-Marketing & E-Service
CRM 7.0
CRM - Interaction Center
CRM Sales

Hi Faisal,
Thank you very much for your prompt reply. With your suggestion, I do figure out where my problem is. I did set the control flag in my ldapAuthenticator "OPTIONAL". However, it appears that the DefaultAuthenticator is given as "REQUIRED" by default.
Once I changed it to be "OPTIONAL", it works.
Thanks again.
John

Condition Definition Logic group/alone

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for