Condition on a Local Structure element-BI7

Hi All,
BI7, I have to create a structure with 2 key figures and then build a condition on one of the keyfigures.
I have done this but in query designer it gives me a error "condition is created on a structure element which is never visible"
Pls suggest.

Condition seems to be appropriate. definition is proper. its only that its not built directly on a keyfigure, but on a keyfigure which is under a local structure..
Pls suggest

Similar Messages

Drilldown vs Structure Element issue

Dear Gurus,
I have 2 free chars and several structure elements in my query along with 3 KFs. My req is like this.
KFs - KF1 KF2
Struc Elements - S1 S2 S3 whereas say S3 is nothing but a formula S1+S2.
Free Chars - FC1 FC2
Data in Cube:
FC1    FC2     KF1      KF2
A1       B1        1           1
A1       B2        1           1
A1       B3        1           1
A2       B4        1           1
A2       B5        1           1
A2       B6        1           1
When I execute te query its all fine. My report looks stg like this..
S1      3         3............condition FC1 = A1
S2      3         3............condition FC1 = A2
S3      6         6
When I drill down on FC1 and FC2, I see this...
S1      A1    B1    1      1
S1      A1    B2    1      1
S1      A1    B3    1      1
Result                 3      3
S2      A2    B4    1      1
S2      A2    B5    1      1
S2      A2    B6    1      1
Result                 3      3
S3      A1    B1    1      1
S3      A1    B2    1      1
S3      A1    B3    1      1
S3      A2    B4    1      1
S3      A2    B5    1      1
S3      A2    B6    1      1
Result                 6      6
Basically, we do not want to see the breakdown on S3 when we drilldown on the free characteristics...Any ideas how to do this ?

Thanks Rakesh, but thats not what I am looking for. May be I did not put the question right. I want to see the report as below when I drilldown on my free chars.
S1 A1 B1 1 1
S1 A1 B2 1 1
S1 A1 B3 1 1
Result 3 3
S2 A2 B4 1 1
S2 A2 B5 1 1
S2 A2 B6 1 1
Result 3 3
S3 -    - 6 6

WAD: add new formula / structure element to report run by user

Hi,
I know that there is a possibility to add a formula or "structure element" to a WAD report that is being run by a user (user opens WAD report and can add a formula). We are using WAD 7. Unfortunately I don't know where this function is hidden in WAD (I am new to WAD....).
Thanks!

Hi Steve,
Make sure you have the following web item and property enabled in your WAD template.
~ Context Menu Item > Local Formula
Once this is enabled, you can run the WAD report, right click and select Calculations and Translations > Formula > Create New formula
This will populate teh formula builder.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Snehith.

Convert BeX query Global structure to local structure

Hi Experts,
How to convert a BeX query Global structure to local structure? Can anyone give the Steps involved.
Thanks in Advance,
Namrata.

Hi Sanchana,
BeX query Global structure to local StructureSteps:
In a local structure when you want to add structure elements that are unique to the specific query. Changing the global structure changes the structure for all the queries that use the global structure. That is the reason you go for a local structure.
Coming to the navigation part->In the BEx Analyzer-> from the SAP Business Explorer toolbar---> choose the open query icon (icon that looks like a folder) ->On the SAP BEx Open dialog box->Choose Queries--->Select the desired InfoCube --->Choose New.
In the Define the query screen->In the left frame-> expand the Structure node.
Drag and drop the desired structure into either the Rows or Columns frame->Select the global structure->Right-click and choose Remove reference.A local structure is created.
Remember that you cannot revert back the changes made to global structure in this regard. You will have to delete the local structure and then drag n drop global structure into query definition.When you try to save a global structure, a dialogue box prompts you to confirm changes to all queries.
Hope this info helps..
Cheers,
Tanish

How can I reach a structure-element instead of structure(value of other variable)

Hi gurus,
Sorry If my question is not really clear.
Now I give result to a structure element.(green)
But I'd like to replace this with the red.
TYPES: BEGIN OF structure,
              x1          TYPE i,
              x2          TYPE i,
              x3          TYPE i,
              x4          TYPE i ,
END OF structure.
DATA: s TYPE structure,
     name TYPE char2.
name = 'X1'.
s-x1 = 0.
s-(name) = 0.
How can I do this? With filed symbol?
Thanks,
Mark

Hi Mark
Please check this syntax 'ASSIGN COMPONENT <comp> OF STRUCTURE <s> TO <FS>.'
regards,
Archer

Virtual directory mapping: how to use variable in local-path element

Hi all
We are using a virtual-directory-mapping declaration in the deployment descriptor
for our web application to load jsp'a and other files from the file system.
This declaration looks like this:
<virtual-directory-mapping>
<local-path>c:/views/jsp</local-path>
<url-pattern>*.jsp</url-pattern>
</virtual-directory-mapping>
Here is my question:
Is there a possibility to use a variable in the local-path element? Something
like:
<virtual-directory-mapping>
<local-path>%PATH_TO_JSP%</local-path>
<url-pattern>*.jsp</url-pattern>
</virtual-directory-mapping>
If yes, how does it look like? My example above didn't work.
If no, is there another way to do that?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Iwan

posting to servlets newsgroup
"Iwan Bussmann" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
>
Hi all
We are using a virtual-directory-mapping declaration in the deploymentdescriptor
for our web application to load jsp'a and other files from the filesystem.
This declaration looks like this:
<virtual-directory-mapping>
<local-path>c:/views/jsp</local-path>
<url-pattern>*.jsp</url-pattern>
</virtual-directory-mapping>
Here is my question:
Is there a possibility to use a variable in the local-path element?Something
like:
<virtual-directory-mapping>
<local-path>%PATH_TO_JSP%</local-path>
<url-pattern>*.jsp</url-pattern>
</virtual-directory-mapping>
If yes, how does it look like? My example above didn't work.
If no, is there another way to do that?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Iwan

Missing images - "XML structure element, not in layout"

I'm putting together handouts for several classes, which largely consists of copying and pasting text from Microsoft Word into InDesign CS5. Images I am placing manually. After re-organizing some of my files, one of my documents is now missing 118 links to images. However, none of these images are actually in my document - in the Links panel, each image says:
"XML structure element, not in layout"
Here's a screenshot of my links panel:
These images are not supposed to be in the document at all. Clicking "Go To Link" does nothing. Is it possible that copy and pasting text from Word could have also copied the images in the Word document as well, without actually placing them on the pages? They now seem to be stuck in some kind of InDesign limbo.
The only way I was able to get rid of them was to delete elements from the XML structure panel, however this deletes the content from my pages, which is not exactly helpful. Is there some way to just remove all of the missing image links from my document? Many thanks for any help!

I was able to solve my problem. After displaying the Structure panel, I apparently had tons and tons of XML elements in the XML structure that were not placed in the document. I've never even seen the Structure panel before so this is totally new to me. I was able to delete all of the XML elements that were not placed in my document by checking their icons.

Check-In not locked for structure element in SOLMAN_DIRECTORY

Hi,
In the solution manager, as a pre-requisite of the one of the upgrade project,
all the BPS nodes should be checked in the solution directory.
But we are not able to check in .
Getting below error message.
" Check-In not locked for structure element PD-PPD of type with object_no 0000847512 "
Message no. MAINT_PR046
Can anyone please suggest what could be the issue.

Please ensure whether both projects have the same budget profile. Other than that you need to carefully investigate how the cost was posted onto both projects in the first place. Please note in case of procurements, budget is only checked at the commitments level (search the forum as this has been discussed before).
In case this does not resolve your issue, revert back with the budget profile settings.
Regards,
Ammar

The "Use Selection of Structure Elements" Option in RSRT Query Properties

Hi, does anyone know the side effect of enabling this option for all BEx Queries? The help states the following: "The Use Selection of Structure Elements option can be selected for any query; however, it is only useful in some cases. In queries, selections are frequently based on one or more characteristics in the columns, or more precisely, in the structure elements. One or more of these structure elements are often filtered in the BEx Analyzer or in BEx Web applications. If you do not select the Use Selection of Structure Elements option, these dynamic (structure element) selections are not transferred to the database. Normally, the data for the entire structure or for both structures is then read from the database." It sounds to me that there is no harm in checking this flag all the time, but what is confusing is the default state of this option; i.e. unchecked.
I would appreciate if someone can clarify the downside of checking this flag.
Thanks,
Mohamed Judi

Hello Michael,
Checking this simple property helps improve performance in situations where there are many Restricted Key Figures and other calculations in the Query Definition
If analysis of the query performance indicates very high EVENTID 3200 times, and/or the FEMS number is very high try enabling this property and check performance.
Checking this ensures the structure elements are sent to the database for processing.
Check the below link: Page 14
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/006b1374-8f91-2d10-fe9c-f9fa12e2f595?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true&48747879633011
Thanks,
Vinay

Security on structure element in Roadmap

Hi,
Does anyone know if it is possible to set security at the level of a structure element in a roadmap?
Here's an example Roadmap I built:
1.0 Concept Initiation
     1.1Establish Conceptual Solution
          1.1.1 Basing on the business requirements
                   1.1.1.1 Create Solution Map
                   1.1.1.2 Process Design Walkthrough
Both User A & B can access the Project Documentation tab under 1.1.1.1 but I would like User A to be able to access the Project Documentation under 1.1.1.2 but not User B. User B should receive a message that he cannot access that particular node because of confidential information.
Appreciate any help.
Thanks
Danielle
<u></u>

Danielle,
yes, you can do this.
1) Setting
SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN -> Proj. Team Member Tab -> select the check mark
"restrict changes to nodes in project to assigned team members"
2) ensure that the selected users (A and B) are added as team members in solar01
in the administration tab
-Regards
Ravi

Standard Objects for Work Breakdown Structure Element (WBS Element)

In 0FI_GL_4 , there are two fields :
Component    |   Component Type   |   Data Type   |    Length      |    Short Description
PROJK           | PS_PSP_PNR         | NUMC              |      8                Work Breakdown Structure Element (WBS Element)
PS_POSID      | PS_POSID             | CHAR              | 24               Work Breakdown Structure Element (WBS Element)
For "PS_POSID", there is a standard Object "0WBS_ELEMT" to be matched.
But ,Which object to match the "PROJK " ?   Is that "0WBS_ELM_EX" ?

Hi,
The object 0WBS_ELEMT_EX is actually for a different puspose.
Check this. http://help.sap.com/saphelp_em70/helpdata/en/d7/22417391807646910d01ee241628e1/content.htm
So for PROJK, i'd advise you to check what kind of output you get for this field in RSA3 and then go from there.
If you already know what it means, you can try to find a similar object in the content, otherwise just create one with similar element type.
-RMP

What does the local-address element stand for here?

Please se the following Coherence Extend Proxy Configuration file:
What does the <local-address> element stand for? Does it define that only the local clients (local with server proxy) can be accepted?
<local-address>
    <address>localhost</address>
    <port>9099</port>
</local-address>
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE cache-config SYSTEM "cache-config.dtd">
<cache-config>
<caching-scheme-mapping>
    <cache-mapping>
      <cache-name>dist-*</cache-name>
      <scheme-name>dist-default</scheme-name>
    </cache-mapping>
</caching-scheme-mapping>
<caching-schemes>
    <distributed-scheme>
      <scheme-name>dist-default</scheme-name>
      <lease-granularity>member</lease-granularity>
      <backing-map-scheme>
        <local-scheme/>
      </backing-map-scheme>
      <autostart>true</autostart>
    </distributed-scheme>
    <proxy-scheme>
      <service-name>ExtendTcpProxyService</service-name>
      <thread-count>5</thread-count>
      <acceptor-config>
        <tcp-acceptor>
          <local-address>
            <address>localhost</address>
            <port>9099</port>
          </local-address>
        </tcp-acceptor>
      </acceptor-config>
      <autostart>true</autostart>
    </proxy-scheme>
</caching-schemes>
</cache-config>

I think you not got the real meaning here.
<local-address> element is used to specify a local address (IP or DNS name) and port that the TCP/IP ServerSocket (opened by the connection acceptor) will listen on. It's not a filter used to confine the client IP address.
For example, the following will instruct the connection acceptor to bind the TCP/IP ServerSocket to 192.168.0.2:9099:
<local-address>
<address>192.168.0.2</address>
<port>9099</port>
<reusable>true</reusable>
</local-address>

Documentation of structure elements

hi, all,
i created some structures and now I have to write a dokumentation abouth them. Is there any easy way to pick up the elements of the structure and the selections in detail?
Right mouse and Documents doesn't work.
Many thanks in advance
neven

Hello Michael,
Checking this simple property helps improve performance in situations where there are many Restricted Key Figures and other calculations in the Query Definition
If analysis of the query performance indicates very high EVENTID 3200 times, and/or the FEMS number is very high try enabling this property and check performance.
Checking this ensures the structure elements are sent to the database for processing.
Check the below link: Page 14
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/006b1374-8f91-2d10-fe9c-f9fa12e2f595?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true&48747879633011
Thanks,
Vinay

PM structure element

Hello Guys,
I am just wondering what is the exact purpose of using "I" PM strcuture element category in BOM's for maintenance.
I have gone thru the help and nothing in detail. Can anyone tell with a small example and the neccessity.
Mahee

Mahee,
Normally when you create a BOM item , that material needs to exists in Plant. However by defining this item as as PM structure element, provides you with ability to add items that do not have any plant specific data maintained in the material master.
The materials that are not plant specific are generally objects that are identified as of MATERIAL TYPE "Maintenance Assembly" . These materials generally cannot be procured and hence they don't require plant specific data.Basically these are a collection of materials, that make up a main material(Maintenance assembly material) that cannot be Procured as a single material but can be fixed.An example could be a Pump assembly which is no longer manufactured by the vendor.
Regards
Narasimhan

Solar01 Structure Element Configuration

Hi Solution Manager Gurus ,
In transaction code Solar01 , There are three default available structure elements such as;
- Organization unit,
- Master data,
- Business scenarios..
as you know that I want to delete/configure these structure elements in terms deleting any of them and/or changing of the namespaces as whatever I want accordingly. I have just created on my own roadmap & flavors (ZPR_DTY_ROADMAP & ZPR_DTY_ROADMAP) when i create my own project by means of SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN that has been constructed by Scope---> Roadmap Select with my own roadmap & flavors (ZPR_DTY_ROADMAP & ZPR_DTY_ROADMAP).
Is it possible to modify and/or delete these default structure elements in terms of given above the scenario? Could you possibly help me in order to solve this issue accordingly?
Kind Regards,
Emrah

hi
you cannot. its standard if you donot what to use do not give any values to them and proceed.

Condition on a Local Structure element-BI7

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for