Condition Type PB00 is updated with 0 price with program RM06INP0

Hi Gur

hi,
check value at table EINE for field EBELN/EBELP..
and check value at EINE-PRDAT...
If you do NOT tick "Price determination w/o PO" then the net price from the Last PO is used (In case there is a last PO in EINE-EBELN/EBELP)
but ONLY in case no valid condition can be found for the info record.
The point is that in case no valid info record conditions exists, it can
take the one from the last PO...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Similar Messages

  • NAVM condition type not getting updated in PO with account assignment K

    Hi Sap Gurus
    Pls help me resolving this issue
    We had created a PO (K-Acc Assignment) with certain tax percentage (16%) in the past .When we view the PO in display mode we can see the equivalent value of 16% being appearing in NAVM at item level.Further on when we hit the Invoice TAB and try to view the taxes.We can see the net price being updated in BASB condition type,and the equivalent value of 16% being updated in AP1I.
    This looks to be perfect but when we again go back to he same PO screen from Tax Screen the value that had intially appeared in NAVM(equivalent of 16 tax%) becomes zero.This happens so for the old PO.
    But for new PO nothing is appearing in NAVM condition tab in PO item level,inspite of the fact that some tax percentage has been maintained.Again this tax percentage can be viewed from Invoice TAB and it takes part in the calcualtion updating th AP!I key mentioned earlier.SOme changes have been made in the config due to which all new POs being created now as no value being updated in NAVM tab inspite of maintaining the tax percentage.
    All other  std settings have been used.
    Additional info:
    In the pricing procedure from FICO side..for the condition type AP1I accrual key NAV is used.
    It has the access seq MWST.
    cond class,claculatio type,cond category  for AP1I being: Taxes,percentage,Tax respectively
    AP1I is not marked as statistical.
    NAVM has no acess seq.
    cond class,claculatio type,cond category  for AP1I being: Taxes,Fixed amount,Input Tax not deductible(N) respectively.
    NAVM is marked as statistcal
    pls give me some leads so as to identify why the value does not appear  in NAVM condition type

    system wont generate any controlling document for noted items  downpayment and normal payments.
    Because all are balance sheet accounts. Controlling documents will generated for only P&L accounts.
    Your analysis correct.

  • Unable to manually change the amount for condition type PB00

    Hi Gurus,
    My client is using ECC5.0.
    Here when I try to change the amount for condition type PB00 using transaction ME22N, I am not able to change the value. I donu2019t get any error, but as soon as I change the value and press Enter the system replaces my entered value with the original value.
    Confusing part is that I am able to change the amount of condition price PB00 manually using transaction ME22. I donu2019t have any such problems there.
    Also I am able to manually change the amount of condition type PBXX using ME22N.
    Only in the case of PB00, if I use ME22N to manually update the amount I am not able to change it.
    Kindly help me, to find a reason as to why this could be happening, and correcting if possible?
    Thanks in advance,
    Imran

    Hello Imram,
    The purpose of maintaining 2 condition types  ie PB00 and PBXX in  a pricing procedure is that PB00 is automatic gross price determination and PBXX is manually giving gross price.
    If you go to T.Code : M/06 and check the condition types, you can see that PB00 will be having an access sequence but not PBXX.
    So if you have to manually give the gross price, you have to use PBXX.
    Regards

  • Condition type PB00 and PBXX

    Dear Gurus,
    When system pick condition type PB00 and when it picks PBXX ?
    I have made one scheduling agreement having 20 line items. For some line items it has picked condition type PB00 and for rest it has picked PBXX. Why system is picking PB00 for some line items and PBXX for rest ?

    Hi,
    If you create an Info Record manually or automatically the gross price is entered or adopted is assigned to condition type PB00.
    When PO is created with reference to a contract or a quotation a vendor`s gross price for a material is adopted from the Info Record condition. (or where appropriate from PO price history) as default value for condition type PB00.
    If no valid info. record condition exists and no order price history can be found, the R/3 system is not able to suggest a price and requires the manual entry of price and a manual entry of net price. The manually entered price is assigned to the condition type PBXX.
    These two condition type for the gross price must be available in the calculation schema assigned to the standard PO. In the standard system these are the condition type PO00 and PBXX. An access sequence is assigned to PB00 so that the price determination process can be carried out for this condition type. No access sequence is assigned to PBXX . PB00 must come before PBXX in the calculation schema. You can also use your own comparable condition type in place of PB00 and PBXX.
    At the time a PO is created, is the system finds a condition record belonging to PB00 with valid condition, PBXX is irrelevant. PBXX is taken into account only if requirement  6 is fulfilled. Requirement 6 checks the condition exclusion indicator (KOMP-KZNEP).
    Hope this lengthy answer clears your doubt(s)!!
    Reetesh

  • Condition type PB00 and PBXX, coming in the same PO Item

    Hi,
    In the PO (created with reference to Outline Agreement),  condition types PB00 and PBXX are coming in the same line item.
    In the PO output, the PB00 value is also showing up and PBXX value is also showing up. User entered PBXX value as 350000 dollars which is right, however system is picking 1.2 million dollar of PB00 from outline agreement which is not intended here. As a result of that the output going to Vendor is exceeding more than 1.2 million dollar instead of 350,000 dollars. I cannot change or delete any othe condition types.THis is a production problem.
    Has anyone faced this problem. I appreciate your reply in advance.
    Thanks,

    Well, thanks Saurav and Prabhakaran, however the problem still stays.
    The contract is created for services (1 lot), so the dollar amount can vary depending upon the service rendered by the consultant.
    That mean user will only enter the service amount.
    Saurav, system should not copy down PB00, it should come by itself when user enters the specific amount. And it comes from contract. PBXX should only appear if there is no PB00 maintained in the contract. This is not the case. The service amount is maintained in the contract. Also, I don't think that PBXX and PB00 should come in one line item together as normal system behaviour &  as a normal business process too. Moreover, it is not happeniing in the other two line items - line item 20 and line item 30 are fine. The pricing analysis shows both the conditions as found - PB00 and PBXX, so I could not take any clue from analysis too.
    Prabhakaran, system is only behaving incorrectly for line item 10. It is behaving as expected (good ) for other line items and other PO's. So, we cannot touch the pricing procedure as that will affect other line items.
    Regards

  • Condition type needed as both internal price and shown as cost in KE24

    Dear friend,
    I like to set up a condition type with attribute of internal price but like to it to be show as cost in profitability .
    Please see details.
    condition type needed as a internal price under condition part in SO line item , but will not be shown in customer invoice,
    At the same time, condition type needed to be shown in KE24 Please advise.
    Thanks,
    LG

    Hi
    You can transfer any kind of condition from SD to COPA although it will be an statistical condition (see for instance tcode KE4I).
    Talk with a CO consultant, because you will have to do a serie of steps.
    See these notes:
    Note 62536 - Info: Conditions in Profitability Analysis
    Note 74486 - INFO: Overview of consulting notes for CO-PA
    Regards
    Eduardo

  • What is the difference between Condition Type PB00 and PBXX

    Hallow all,
    Can anybody please explain, What is the Difference between Condition type PB00 and PBXX in Materials Management Pricing?
    And also please explain control or Application of both on Price determination ??
    Thanks in Advance !!!!!

    Hi,
    PB00 condition type is used for automatic pricing in PO
    PBXX condition type is used for manual pricing in PO
    In Pricing  access sequence  play a vital role . If you need pricing automatic in the PO, you have use of Access Sequences and Schema Group of Vendor.You can see the difference in both standard condition type PB00 and PBXX, where as PB00 is assigned to Access sequence(0002)but in case of PBXX no access sequense assigned.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Condition Types PB00 & PBXX

    As we know, in Purchase orders, Condition type PB00 flows from  Outline agreements/inforecord/Condition records etc, while condition type PBXX is to be maintained manually.Also PBXX if maintained supersedes PB00 i.e is considesed for Gross/Net price calculations.
    The requirements at a client's place is as follows:
    For most of the regularly procured materials, contracts are maintained. Hence generally the P.O. price will be automatically determined as PB00. However there are cases where P.O is placed at a price which  is different from generally agreed price maintained in contracts. In such cases price is to be entered manually  as PBXX in P.O.,but the defaulted price should also remain i.e the p.o.should show both PB00 & PBXX so that Purchase Manager's  attention is drawn to such cases
    The issue is while standard  Gross/Net/Tax calculations are taken care of ,subtotals in the pricing schema are going wrong. To illustrate...
    Step   Counter   condition type      Description            from      To
    10        1               PB00            Gross Price
    10        2               PBXX            Gross Price
    20        1               R000             Discount                   10       10
                                                      Subtotal (Net price)    10       20  
    The subtotal(Net price) which is the base for some of the  further condition types in the schema , calculated as sum of PB00 & PBXX minus Discount. It should be PB00 minus discount if PBXX (manual price is not maintained) & PBXX minus discount if the same is maintained.
    Will appreciate your inputs
    Thanks

    Dear,
    The difference between pricing conditions PB00 and PBXX is :
    PB00- automatic pricing - can be used for automatic pricing determination
    PBXX- manual pricing - used for manual pricing.
    When you maintain the pricing condition for the PO, the system will look at the available condition records (for PB00) and make the automatic pricing determination. In case, such condition records were not defined, then it is mandatory that you have to maintain manually the pricing condition where PBXX will be automatically defaulted in replacement for PB00.
    Regards,
    Syed Hussain.

  • Condition types PB00 and PBXX

    Dear Experts,
    1) Can anybody please explain that can we use Condition type PB00 in number of Pricing  procedures. like i have three pricing procedures, local purchase, Import Purchase,
    External Service Pricing procedure.
    what is recommend, eiether to use same one (PB00) or maintain seperate condition type for each Pricing procedure ?
    2) What is the difference between Condition type PB00 and PBXX ?
    Waiting for your valuable reply
    Thanks in Advance

    Dear,
    The difference between pricing conditions PB00 and PBXX is :
    PB00- automatic pricing - can be used for automatic pricing determination
    PBXX- manual pricing - used for manual pricing.
    When you maintain the pricing condition for the PO, the system will look at the available condition records (for PB00) and make the automatic pricing determination. In case, such condition records were not defined, then it is mandatory that you have to maintain manually the pricing condition where PBXX will be automatically defaulted in replacement for PB00.
    Regards,
    Syed Hussain.

  • How to stop non statistical condition type value from updating total amount

    Gurus,
    Can any body explain me how to do following setting,
    How to Stop non statistical condition type value from updating Total Amount
    Regards,
    Sai

    Dear Sai,
    You need to make that condition type as Statistical one
    Go to SPRO - Sales and Distr. - Basic Functions - Pricing - Define and Assign Pricing Proc - Maintain Pricing Proc - Control Date
    Select the proc. - select the condition type and activate the  check box Statistical
    This will show the amount of the condition but will not consider for the net value calculation
    Hope this will help you
    regards,
    Sagar

  • Condition types in SRM for mapping purposes with backend contracts

    Hello,
    We need to map condition types for the creation of a Backend contract on the basis of a accepted bid.
    We use SRM 5.0 but our products do not have prices in their product master!
    We use the catalog funcion to indicate the prices of the materials. for service-items we manually add the prices in the Shopping cart.
    How can I find out what conditions types we use in these circumstances in SRM 5.0?
    What condition type are we using in the case of materials?
    What condition type are we using in the case of service-items?
    Thanks for any reply.
    Aart

    Hi
    You can map the condition type 01CT (gross price) in SRM with PB00 for Gross Price in contracts. Standard SRM  generally work with simple pricing with gross price condition types and do not have complex conditions unless you customize it. For material or services, it should matter from condition perspective unless you have done some specific customization.
    Regards,
    Sanjeev

  • ORDERS Inbound EDI1 Condition type not getting updated

    Hi Experts,
            As per the client requirement, during ORDERS Inbound process we need to capture the "Customer expected Price" in EDI1 Condition type in the sales order. So we maintained the details in the E1EDP01 in field VPREI.
    But during ORDERS Inbound process this EDI1 field is not getting updated. Can anyone please help us on this.
    Warm Regards,
    VEL

    Problem of our ABAP coding distrubed the std functionality. In std SAP, this functionality will work without any issue.

  • Condition type value not update in sales order

    Hello Guru's
    As per the  sales order in VA01 the condition type value i.e surcharge value is not updating in sales order.
    But I have maintain the condition record(Surcharge)also and in Condition technique I have checked every thing is correct .
    please find below I have attached the Screen short .
    Please give me solution Asap.

    Hi Sukdev,
    Have you checked the respective pricing procedure for From and To reference step maintained against the condition type ZSUR?
    Regards,
    T.R.S.Praveen

  • Condition type should be ignored if price is 0.

    I have a price condition type wherein the scale value is maintained such that if qty is less than 100pcs., price is 0 and for quantity above 100, the price is 10EUR. My requirement is that when the quantity is less than 100pcs., then the other price conditions should get determined. As scale is mainatined here, the conditon record is found and price picked is 0. Also, further price conditions are not checked as condition record has been found. How can I ignore this condition when price is 0. Please advise
    Sandeep

    Try Condition Exculsion Tcode VB02
    Here you take the two condition types depending upon your scale and make It exclusive .
    If you have some specific requirement then you will need the help of the ABAPER where you can assign a specific formulate  or requirement to the condition types.
    reward points if helpful,
    regards,
    Amlan Sarkar

  • Condition Type MVK0 & MVK1 and How it is linked with SD pricing ?

    Hi Experts,
    In my purchase order, line item for an article (material) there is a condition type MVK0 (Sales Price inc. Tax) and MVK1 ( Sales price excl tax) which appears in Red in IS-Retail server.
    The pricing analysis says that the condition has been found without the condition record.
    The details for condition type MVK1 is
    Condition class:- Prices (B), Calc type:- C (QTY),
    Condition category J ( Customer Expected price)
    There is no access sequence for this condition type.
    Manual entries      D Not possible to process manually
    The details for condition type MVK1 is
    Cond. class   B Prices
    Calculat.type C Quantity
    Cond.category W Expected sales price (including tax)
    Access Sequence:  Not maintained
    Manual entries      D Not possible to process manually
    I wish to know how to populate values for these condition type.
    Also could someone throw light on the condition category Wand J.
    what is the importance of MVK0 & MVK1 condition types and How it is linked with SD pricing?
    if we want this condition types values in PO what settings needs to be done?
    Any Input is highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Selvakumar. M

    CLOSED

Maybe you are looking for