Condition Type wise billing

Following is the scenario
Customer takes Deliveries from 1st till 14th of every month and on 15th he is billed for all the deliveries (Delivery related billing)
Each delivery contains only "one Single Line Item"
6 Different condition types are used to charge this single line item that is:
Condition A
Condition B
Condition C
Condition D
Condition E
Condition F
Client want to "only bill Condition Type B" on 7th and 15th of every month seperately from all other condition types, with different payment terms
Is there any way to carry out billing on the basis of ConditionType in Standard System???

Not in the standard system. But you can create a routine for the copy control from delivery to billing.
You can use the client attribute KATR1... and in the routine, when you fill ZUK table, you will separate billing.
zuk-CONDTYPE = kna1-katr1. In the routien there are several ways.

Similar Messages

Condition type wise report

can we have condition type wise report of all billing documents executed
thanks
srinivasan

See u r prices are in KONV & Billing Tables are VBRK & VBRP
VBRK is Header Table
VBRP is Detail table
Now enter billing document number in VBELN field of VBRK & extract KNUMV i.e Document Condition.
Also enter billing document number in VBELN field and material number in field of MATNR & extract Item Number POSNR,
So now u are having Document condition & item number
Put this two things in KNUMV & KPOSN fields of KONV & u will get all values in KWERT according to Condition Type.
I hope this will help u.
Regards
SWAPNIL

Tracking manual condition types in billing document

Hi,
I need to track changes in manual condition types in billing docs over a period of time. These changes are not maintained at Change doc tables (CDHDR,CDPOS).
Please suggest whether there is any other way to solve this issue.
Thanks.

Hi,
Check with KONV table
Enter the Condition record number in field KNUMV of table KONV (This you can get from VBRK table for the Billing Document), and check with the field KMPRS in KONV.
Reward point if it helps !!!!!
Harsh

Condition type in Billing not in Sales Order

Dear Friends,
I have the following scenario in our project. Please clarify.
We have a condition type. That should be appeared only in Billing, it should not appear in Sales Order.
Please answer ASAP.
Regards,
Rajesh L

Hello,
To fullfil you requirement go to V/08 select your pricing procedure and relevant condtion type. Then select requirement column and assign the Routing 24 click save.
regards
rc gopi

Purchase Order item value breakup condition type wise

Dear Sir,
We are developing a custom report and in this report we need to reflect for Purchase Order item wise the break-up of values at the condition type level .
In Me23n , at at Item Level , when we click on tab <Condition> then all values break-up at condition type level gets displayed .
But to use in custom program , we need to know the table where this information is available .
Kindly guide us pl .
Regards
B Mittal

Hi,
This suggestion is based on my understanding of your issue. May not be straight forward SAP solution.
I would suggest you to make following assessment for your custom program: (going through the condition tab will lead you to structures)
1. Try to figure out how the pricing condition are maintained. Normally you have your Base price PBXX or gross price per EA defined that can be found in the PIR of the material + Vendor combination or in the pricing condition you would have defined.
2. In same way figure out all the other absolute condition types. I mean any thing that is not % percentage based on PBXX value. (assess ;your pricing Schema to understand this.
3. Once you know how is your pricing schema breakup then try to pick the net price of PO and then do a backward calcuation based on PIR condition value. .
Hope this helps.
thx
MJ

Condition type at billing level

hi all
In condition type we keep maual entry allow "C" .
In sales order we enter basic price manually .
We want that value can not changed at billing level
How to do this ?

In copying control for sales order to billing document or delivery to billing document (Transaction VTFL / VTFA) select appropriate pricing type to meet your requirements. In case you want to copy pricing elements unchanged, select option 'D' or pricing type that meets your requirement.

Duplication of condition types at billing

Hi all ,
hope all of u r doing well,
i am using 3 pricing procedure 1 at sales order , 1 at delivery order, 1 at billing
there are some condition types that are same in sales order , delivery and billing
i am using pricing type "C"
at billing level it duplicates the some condition types
i want to avoaid this duplication without changing the pricing type "C" as its user requirement
thanks

Hello Colleague;
Sorry but I think I didn't understand your question.
I never see before a process with 3 differents pricing procedure at the same scenario, one ofr each sales document type.
It seems to be as a standard behavior, the problem could be if you were working with just one pricing procedure.
Regards
Ruy Castro

How to setup a one-time vs. monthly condition type for billing?

Hi SD Gurus,
Our customer contracts invovle a fixed monthly charge that needs to be billed every month for the duration of the contract.
I've set this up successfully through a condition type. My condition type is setup as periodic billing.
Our customer contracts also involve a fixed one-time charge (e.g. setup fees).
My requirement stipulates that when our sales department creates a sales order, the system should automatically populate the one-time charge along with the the monthly charges.
I'm having trouble with this requirement. I would like to know how I can configure the system so that the condition type shows up only for the first month. In my configuration, the one-time fee shows up for all the months.
Thanks!
Edited by: Jamal Kazmi on Jun 4, 2009 9:55 AM

user8710670 wrote:
Thanks a lot for your information.
Yes, I think my command is good to setup a service.
But this service is a load balance service.
Through this service, all the connections will be put at both nodes.
Currently, my requirement is that I need a service
Through this service, all the connections will only be put at one node,
until this node damaged,
then the connections are put at another node
Do we have a way for this case?
Your service will not run on both nodes. It will run on one and failover to the other. However, a better way would be to define it as a policy manged service, which may be what you are thinking of.

Z condition type for surcharge need to be displayed in billing doc only.

Hi ,
I am having going to create condition type for surcharge, this condition type need to be diplayed only in billing doc.condition value should be calculated based weight of the material in delivery doc and scales in condition record.
scales values are as below:
Access key:
sales org/dis channel/ route /sales unit(KG)
DE10/02/DETX1/   1 Kilo   =   30 u20AC
skales:
DE10/02/DETX1 / 31 Kilo = 35 u20AC
DE10/02/DETX1/ 41 Kilo =   40u20AC
DE10/02/DETX1/ 51 Kilo =   45u20AC
then for 52 Kilo we have price for these item with 52 Kilo = 45 u20AC
where exactly need to do the config and development changes for displaying in condition type in billing doc only.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
RAM

In the Pricing Procedure , maintain requirement as 24 against the Z Condition type.Now it will reflect the value only in Billing Document.
Best Regards,
Ankur

Billing Document Not releasing to Accounting because of Condition Type

Hi,
We have used Sales Condition Type ZSCM(Which is a statistical condition type) in Billing Documents and they are already released to Accounting.Today we have created one more Billing Document with same Condition type ZSCM.But this billing document is not getting released to Accounting?
What could be the reason? Why it was released to Accounting before with the same condition type ZSCM and why it is not getting released to Accounting this time.
I am breaking my head to find the possible reasons...kindly help me out to find the problem.
1.Billing document 90005889 - has value 64.48462- and It has only 2 Items and it was released to accounting
2.Billing document 90005729 - has value 217.87960- and It has only 21 Items and it was not released to accounting and asking to activate +/- sing in KE4I transaction for the ZSCM condition type.
Why billing document 90005889 is released for accounting and why 90005729 was not released to accounting?
Thanks
Supriya

Hi,
There can be following possible reasons fo the samed :
1. If the specific GL account is not getting any assignment to CO object.
2. Also you need to check assignment with VKOA that whichever GL is assigned as per business process of Sales (the account which is going to be credited) and all relevant settings in VKOA.
3. Pls check all substitutions and validations if any connected with that condition type and GL. Becuase sometimes it may happen that because of calling some other application (for ex. Set or substitution as generally transportation of this element happen with entire hierarchy if you add your substition in the node.) at he time of posting of billing document. This has already happen with our business scenario.
4. Also check if this sales revenue GL is assinged to any set and if that set is called through any substitution ot validation.
Pls check all these possibilities and revert.
Thanks & Regards,
Taral Patel

Profit Center on Condition Types for Taxes

We have a billing document whose pricing procedure included two condition types for billing. A single material was delivered and billed but the two line items for the taxes were posted to different profit centers. Where did the difference could have come from?

Hi
Tell me in which version you are in?. What are the account assignments for those condition types?. Do you have multiple sales accounts for that entry?.
Jayaram

Pricing Condition Type - Not visible to the customer

Dear All,
What all the config need to set up in the pricing procuder for a condition type to ensure customer did not wish to see the value for the particular condition type on the invoice. However it should have the ability to value in the condition type automatically post to the correct accounts at the time of invoicing.
Thanks in advance.
Victor

Hi victor
If nobody should change the condition type at billing level or sales order level also means then go to V/06 and set the field Manual Entries - D .
Secondly, in VTFL change the pricing type to C or D then changing the condition type manually is not possible
Regards
Srinath

Authorizations to process SD condition types

hello, friends. i do not have access to SAP now, so i could not test my hypotheses.
in PFCG, we can specify condition types that a user can work with. let us say that in object V_KONH_VKS, we specify whether create, change or display. do these settings apply to:
1. creation, change, display Condition Records in VK11/VK12/VK13? or
2. creation, change, display Condition Types in sales order in VA01/VA02/VA03?
many thanks!

Hi All,
I found Jonathan's observation correct in my case as well and want to know whether there really exists an authorization object for Sales order condition tab which allows a certain user to see the sales order condition tab in only display mode and allows other user to change it.
I dont want condition type wise authorization. the entire tab should be either display only or editable. is this possible without ABAP?
Thanks,
Binita

Error while releasing Billing: Assign HD00 (Frieght) Condition type in COPA

Hi,
I am getting the below error while releasing billing document.
Assign condition HD00 type in COPA
HD00 condition type is frieght condition type
Is it good thing if we assign this condition type to COPA value field in KE4I? or we should not assign Frieght condition to COPA?
Please advise
Thanks
Kishore

HI Kishore,
To which GL account are you posting this freight condition value? Is that GL created as a revenue element (of category '11'/'12')?
If yes (has to be 'yes', since you are getting the error message), then you don't have a choice but assigning a CO-PA value field in KE4I. The idea here is, if you have created the GL as revenue element, then you intend to take it to Controlling module for further analysis. Thus, making your FI/CO reconciliation easy.
If you do want to carry this value to CO-PA for analytical reporting then don't create that particular GL (assuming you are posting freight to a separate GL) as a revenue element. That said, it does make sense to carry this value to CO-PA and in your present case, you don't have a choice as the message which you got is an error message, which you can't circumvent.
Hope this helps.

Condition Type - Values getting changed at billing

Hii All
I have a header condition which is set up as group condition at header level. When an amount is entered at the header level it gets proportionately distributed among the line items. This is fine.
Problem comes when a line item is completely shorted (i.e. delivery quantity becomes 0) then in the billing the header condition value also get reduced.
What setting needs to be done so that the header condition value does not get affected.
Current setting of condition type is as follows:
Condition Class: A
Calculation Type: B
Condition Category: Blank
Copy Control from delivery to billing is marked as 'G'
Pls do let me know if there is a feasible solution for the same.
Many Thanks
Gaurav Manocha

Dear customer,
What you are experiencing with Fixed Amount Header conditions is stand-
ard behaviour. Please see below Notes:
876617 FAQ: Header conditions / Header condition screen
317112 Behavior of conditions w/ calculation rule B changed
485740 Conditions with fixed amount in copy activities
To achieve what you wish (absolute amount), solution is in the below
Notes:
84605 Transfer absolute amount condition to billing doc.
25020 Value changes during over/underdelivery
25144 Freight conditions during milestone billing
But I guess that there are many threads with the same problem.
At first please search for old threads and solutions.
I hope that the information are helpful.
regards
Claudia

Condition Type wise billing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for