Condition Value should not effect on Material Price
Dear All
I have created one condition ZLOC - Local Conveyance ( At header Level & Positive ) and assigned in pricing procedure. But while making PO if i put some value against ZLOC condition its effect on my Net Price of Each Item. Price is getting Increased in respective their Quentity Ratio.
E. G ( Before puting ZLOC )
Material No Po Qty Price
1500000030 10 200
1500000031 1 100
After Putting ZLOC = 100 at header level
1500000030 10 210
1500000031 1 200
I want Per Price Should be remain same & Local Conveyane should be added in Net Amount.
Thanks & Regards
HI
CHANGE UR CALCULATION SCHEMA
u have to frame ur schema as per ur requirement
now for ur case make the entry of this condition at last
create a normal pricing procedure then just after last condition give this condition and try
the procedure will be something like this
base amount
excise
cess
hcess
TOTAL
discount (if any ,u can have this condition after base amount also )
freight
total value
ZLOC - Local Conveyance
FINAL total
regards
KI
Similar Messages
-
PO values should not exceed PR values
Hello
PR value should proposed while creation of PO wr to PR, whenever Info records
are not mainatained and PO values should not exceed the defined limit
Regards
sapmanHi,
You cann't restrict the PO value based on PR value, because the PO value is taken from Info record, Previous PO or Manual entry.
But PR value is from Material master or Manual entry.
Moreover PO value also includes other conditions like discounts/freight/duties etc on the net value so there is no fixed value for PO net price.
But PR will be always a fixed price means either from Material master or Manual entry based on the cost of the material.
So SAP has provided only qty restiction from PR to PO ( Message no. 06076)
but not for the PR value to PO value.
rgds
Chidanand -
Condition Value is not updated
Hi All,
I am using bill of services, so i have a sales order and as a subsequent document a service entry sheet, my invoice is created with reference to the service entry sheet.
In my price procedure i have a percentage guarantee condition.
In the sales order i insert a percentage for the condition, afterwards i create a service entry sheet with reference to the sales order and all the conditions values are copied correctly, till here everything ok.
In the SES i change the guarantee condition value and then i create the invoice, but the guarantee condition value is not updated and takes the value i inserted before in the sales order.
I already tried to change the condition copy control but no sucess.
Anyone can help me with this issue??
Thank you.
Best Regards,
Tiago FerreiraHi Madhu,
Here is my code:
SALES_CONDITIONS_IN-ITM_NUMBER = I_UPLOAD-ITMNUMBER.
SALES_CONDITIONS_IN-COND_TYPE = I_UPLOAD-COND_TYPE.
SALES_CONDITIONS_IN-COND_VALUE = I_UPLOAD-COND_VALUE / 10.
APPEND SALES_CONDITIONS_IN.
CLEAR SALES_CONDITIONS_IN.
SALES_CONDITIONS_INX-ITM_NUMBER = I_UPLOAD-ITMNUMBER.
SALES_CONDITIONS_INX-COND_TYPE = I_UPLOAD-COND_TYPE.
SALES_CONDITIONS_INX-UPDATEFLAG = 'U'.
SALES_CONDITIONS_INX-COND_VALUE = 'X'.
APPEND SALES_CONDITIONS_INX.
CLEAR SALES_CONDITIONS_INX.
I am just creating a CMR with reference to billing document. Its creating condition recod 'ZAP0' correctly, which i am passing manally. But, its not populating condition value to levy condition it should determine automatically.
Please suggest.
Regards,
Srikanth. -
Condition value is not displaying in sales order
Hi Friends,
when i am creating sales order, condition type(JEXP,JECP,JA1X..) is displaying in cond.type column and percentage(14%,2%,1%) is displaying in amount column and
the condition value is not displaying in cond. value column in conitions tab of sales order.
In analysis it is showing as condition record found...
please help me...
with regardsHi,
can it be that you have a problem with units of measure? Often, if there is no value in Condition value, the problem is in the master data of material. Did you use standard schema? If you not, have you tried it with standard schema? What is your value under "per" and "UoM"?
Regards Thomas -
Basic Excise duty condition value is not captured in in Excise tab at GR
Dear Experts
i am facing the problem that, Basic excise duty amount is not appearing / captured in Excise tab, Goods Receipt Screen.
Please guide me on whether the problem is with Excise master data or excise configuration.Dear friend,
please check the your maintained in fv11 or not for the bed, ecess, and secess, and set offs if your using the taxinn procedure
or in case of your using the taxinj at the time for taxcode for the conditions your maintained condition values or not
and again in j1id excise rates your maintained or not check for the particular chapterid of that material
i think this will help you
Regards
Pramod -
Condition value is not updating in shipment cost documents.
We are creating a shipment cost document and condition value is not updating automatically when we enter the amount.
Regards,
JagadeeshDears,
The material master of the material is not maintained with gross weight and net weight, hence automatic updation for condition value is not taking place, i resolved the issue.
Thanks,
Jagadeesh -
Excise Value and Freight value should be add to material cost in the depot
Hi,
Can any one help me on my scenario?
We have depot concept my client requirement is excise Value and Freight value should be add to material cost (inventories at depot) in the depot
Thanks & Regards
KMRHi All,
In Depot Sale. This are the Excise Duty Passed on to the Customer BED, AED ECS, SHECS, Other then that its added to the material cost. Define a Pricing procedure for value added to the material cost in both Procurement & Sales base your problem will be solved.
Regards,
Pherasath -
PO Value should not exceed PR value ~ Control required
Hi All,
I wanted to make PR number has mandatory for PO, i did it with the help of customising settings with doc type.
Now I want to make PO Value should not exceeds the PR Value.
How to make it in settings. or Is thr ant way available to make it (like any User exit, Enancement).
Also can any one tell how to control(make with Doc type).Like only for direct PO, or only indirect PO.
Can anyone help me out to do so.
Regards,
Nagaraj S
Edited by: Nagaraj S on Sep 2, 2009 6:10 AMHi Nagraj,
The funcionality you are talking on - checking tolerance limits between
PReq and PO document - was developed for Public Sector, it uses
the values in the FMIOI table to perform the check. If the PReq does
not have an FM account assignment, no FMIOI record will be written and
the check cannot take place.
In order to assign tolerance key limit to PReq document type please
use following path:
Path is: SPRO -> Public Sector Management -> Functions for US Federal
Government -> Integration -> Materials Management ->
Document-to-Document Tolerances
I am not sure if something like this is there in normal case
regards,
Lalita -
PO tax value is not added in net price
Hi
In PO tax value is not added in Net price .
In the pricing elements it is showing the total value .
But in the field of net value , it is not calculating the net value and so it is showing in the PO print out.
Kindly advise.
regards,Hi Sandeep,
In case u want to print the net value with the tax u have to make the value as print relevant in the pricing procedure .
And also u need to store this value in the field from where the net price is printed and again this can be done in the pricing procedure.
Hope this will help you .
Please reward points for useful answer.
Regards
Mani -
Nonstock material PO value should not allow to change once it picked fromPR
Hi There,
when create PO for non stock material it will pick price from PR to PO once it pick the value again it should not allow to change.
so what ever value is there in PR same should be in PO also even if we try to change PO value system should not allow
so please advise meDear
If you want to copy the price from PR to PO do the following settings
Here we have to do:
First create a parameter in
SPRO>Materials Management>Purchasing>Authorization Management>Define Function
Authorizations for Buyers
set the following fields:
Order price adoption, Ref. to PReq, Change source, Change
OTy./it. cat. and with Field sel. equals to AKTH. After created
this parameter we have to set the users profile (using SU01 Transaction) with Parameter
EFB (Function Authorization: Purchase Order).
After doing all the settings what i mentioned, when you create the requisition that time before saving you have to select the price adoption as net or gross than only it will copy to the po because default is do not copy
so go Valuation tab in the requisition and in PO price field select as nte price or Gross price than save the reqs
now if oyu create the PO you will see the price
Regards -
Sale Order Excise Value should not be zero
Dear Friends
With the User Exit MV45AFZZ Form:: Userexit_Save_Document_Prepare,
we have written a condition that while saving the sale order, if the excise condition value JEX2 is zero, order could not be saved and this is working fine for normal process.
But in some cases, we need to explode the BOM in sale order. In this case, the above user exit is checking for components excise value which should not be the case. In fact, we tried to distinguish with item category for the above exit but the item category structures are not flowing in a particular area of user exit.
My requirement is that for BOM exploded items, the above condition should not trigger for excise value in sale order. It should trigger ONLY for Header Material. How this should be achieved??
thanks
G. LakshmipathiThe problem is solved.
Actually in the above user exit, we had looped thru' xvbap for the item category type NOT equal to 'Order Type'.
Then, we read the xkomv table with two keys JEX2 and POSNV ( referring to vbap-posnr) and checked if condition value is null, if so trigger the error message.
In this way, though the xvbap is not dynamic in that form of userexit, the reading of xkomv helped to achieve
our purpose of triggering the error for header materials.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi -
Tax condition value is not calculating based on condition rate maintained
Hi,
I have maintained the condition rate as 4% for a condition type against a tax code in FV11. and also the validity period is correct.
But when I select the tax code in purchase order and click on taxes button, some other condition value is coming in condition value field for that condition type. for example the PO price is 100Rs. the condition value has to be 4% on 100Rs that is 4Rs. but some constant value is coming 5, even if change the condition rate in FV11 as 0%, the condition value is coming as 5 only.
Does anybody faced this issue.??Hi
for example the PO price is 100Rs. the condition value has to be 4% on 100Rs that is 4Rs. but some constant value is coming 5, even if change the condition rate in FV11 as 0%, the condition value is coming as 5 only.
try this
change your PO value and then observed the changes ,IF then your are getting value different than 5 ,then i think there is no problem in your tax procedure because you are saying after 0% in FV11 also your are get 5 only in PO
as per me you can not put any constant value in tax procedure ,we only map how tax calculation will below for condition
and check your condition record for that vat condition again in FV13
Regads
Kailas ugale -
Returning damage parts should not effect costing
Hi
I have creared one maintenance Order. I issued one spare material like bearing through the order. Actual cost on the order is Rs 200.
Now I want to return the damaged spare i.e. bearing to the store. If I do this through the same order, cost comes Rs-200.
the total cost of order becomes Rs 0.
I want that when I return that damaged spare to store it should not have any implication on the actual cost of the order .
Is it possible w/o using valuation type for the material?
The tick (Not relevant to costing) in the general Data of component tab can be used for this? Though I checked it didnt had any control on the actual cost.
Thanx in advance.hi ravi ,
while returning the damaged spares post the same in non-valuated stock or spares stock and this will not have any effect on your actual costs
regards
pushpa -
Pricing condition records should not be picked up
Hi,
I have configured a scenario for Supplementary Invoice for which I created a new sales order type. The requirement is such that this order type should not pick the pricing condition records that have been created in VK11. Please suggest how can this be configured.
Do I have to use any Userexits, if so which one?
Regards,
AbhishekAs mentioned by you, you have created a new Sales Order Type, you can create a new document pricing procedure, based on which you can determine a new pricing procedure.
To configure new Document Pricing Procedure:
IMG --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Function --> Pricing Control --> Pricing Procedure --> Define Document Pricing Procedure. (Maintain the new Document Pricing Procedure in new Sales Order Type)
Maintain a new Pricing Procedure, maintaining the Condition Types as manual. Maintain the determination of Pricing Procedure appropriately.
Pricing Procedure Determination:
In SD, Pricing Procedure is determined (T.Code: OVKK) based on Sales Area (Sales Organization + Distribution Centre + Division) + Customer Pricing Procedure + Document Pricing Procedure. Sales Area is determined in Sales Order Header Level. Customer Pricing Procedure is determined from Customer Master. Document Pricing Procedure is determined from Sales Document Type / Billing Type (if configured). Once the pricing procedure is determined, Condition records are fetched. If appropriate condition records are found, the price is determined. If Mandatory pricing condition is missing, system will through an error message.
Pricing Procedure Configuration:
In SD, the steps to configure Pricing procedure are as under:
Step 1:
Condition table (T.Code: V/04): If existing condition table meets the requirement, we need not create a new condition table. Considering the requirement for new condition table, the configuration will be done in spro as follows: IMG --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Function --> Pricing Control --> Condition Table (select the required fields combination, which will store condition record).
Step 2:
Access Sequence (T.Code: V/07): If existing access sequence meets the requirement, we need not create a new access sequence. Considering the requirement for new sequence, the configuration will be done in spro as follows: IMG --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Function --> Pricing Control --> Access Sequence (Access sequence is made up of Accesses (Tables) & the order of priority in which it is to be accessed. Here we assign the condition table to access sequence.
Step 3:
Condition Type (T.Code: V/06): If existing condition type meets the requirement, we need not create a new condition type. Considering the requirement for new condition type, the configuration will be done in spro as follows: IMG --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Function --> Pricing Control --> Condition Type. It is always recommended to copy an existing similar condition type & make the neccessary changes. Here we assign Access sequence to Condition type.
Step 4:
a. Pricing Procedure (T.Code: V/08): It is recommended to copy a similar pricing procedure & make the neccesary changes in new pricing procedure. Pricing Procedure is a set of condition type & arranged in the sequence in which it has to perform the calculation. Considering the requirement for new Pricing Procedure, the configuration will be done in spro as follows: IMG --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Function --> Pricing Control --> Pricing Procedure --> Maintain Pricing Procedure.
b. Pricing Procedure (T.Code: VOK0): After maintaining the pricing procedure the next step will be determination of pricing procedure. Configuration for determining pricing procedure in SPRO is as follows: IMG --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Function --> Pricing Control --> Pricing Procedure --> Determine Pricing Procedure.
5. Condition record (T.Code: VK11 / VK12): Condition record is a master data, which is required to be maintained by Core team / person responsible from the client. During new implementation, the condition records can be uploaded using tools like SCAT, LSMW, etc. Condition Record is maintained in T.Code: VK11 / VK12, which are captured in Sales Order & Billing.
Also check document pricing procedure in Sales Document Type (T.Code: VOV8 - Sales order Type, VOFA: Billing Type (If Required)), customer pricing procedure in Customer Master Data (T.Code: XD02), ... are in place.
Regards,
Rajesh Banka -
MR11- Purchase order items not balanced. Material price will be negative
Hi all,
Currently i have PO with stock items with document date on Aug with qty of 5 and good receipt with qty of 5 on the same month as well. After that when it performs MR11- account maintenance i encounter the error above.
It has performed good issue to production and now left 5 qty.
Initially i thought because the stock value cannot absorb the material price, but i have done the same simulation on QAS. it seem to working fine.
Can you assist me on this.Hi Jurgen,
Actually i have found the Snote related to this issue. It has solved the issue for me.
To clear the purchase order items, proceed as follows:
1. Execute transaction MR11 "Maintain GR/IR Clearing Account" with the
relevant selection parameters. Select all proposed account maintenance
document items whose cumulated difference value of a material is less
than the current stock value (SALK3) of the same material.
Post this account maintenance document.
2. Execute transaction MR11 "Maintain GR/IR Clearing Account" with the
above selection parameters again. Select a proposed account
maintenance document item whose difference value is greater than the
current stock value (SALK3) of the same material. Post this
account maintenance document. Post the portion of the current stock
value to the stock account (BSX). The rest is distributed to the price
difference account (PRD). Now the current stock value (SALK3) of the
material is 0.
3. Execute transaction MR11 "Maintain GR/IR Clearing Account" with the
above selection parameters again. Now you can post all remaining
proposed account maintenance document items for this material.
Note 1305016 corrects the symptom described.
SNote 1305016 - MR11_Negative stock value for value-only article II
SNote 983769 - MR11_CKMLGRIR 023 for GR-based IV & matl moving avg. price
Thank again for your assistant.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Unable to login thought i have re-installed latest...
Please reply as soon as possible. I have make sure my password correct. I have recover my password few times to make sure it is correct. I have re-installed it many times to make sure it is latest version. I can login through Internet Explorer browse
-
BPEL fault policy takes more time, when rethrowing
Hi All, I have a scenario where BPEL fault policy is taking more time to re-throw the fault back to BPEL Scenario: 1) Partner link service throws as business exception 2) This exception is first caught by BPEL fault policy, this in-turn will invoke "
-
TS3899 Why don't I receive notification of emails by sound or number on my email icon
I no longer receive a number on my email icon to alert me on mail delivered to me. If I open my emails the number of mail received is there and then the notification alert sounds.
-
Is the webpage for downloading Adobe Flash broken?
I'm using Firefox 25.0.1 with Windows 7 on a Dell laptop, and for the past 3 days I've tried unsuccessfully to download Adobe Flash Player. I start at this screen: http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/. It shows the current version to be Version 11.9.
-
How do I delete apps in iOS 7 from my iPhone?
How do I delete apps in iOS 7 from my iPhone?