Condition value showing negetive

Hi,
In consignement pickup condition values are showing negetive. I checked the condition type its correctly pick up the price. But why the amount in the condition values are showing negetive values.
Chakri

HI
It is the standard behaiviour hope you know in consignment pick up you are taking back the quantity from custmer's consignment stock to un restricted stock by doing consignment pick up
So you are just reversing i think thats why all the conditions value will be negative
regards

Similar Messages

Condition value in a sales order

Hi,
We have a condition type ZLTL (less than truckload) in our pricing procedure and Alt CBV is set to routine 12. Even though there is a record maintained, the condition value shows as 0 in the Item details screen.
The condition rate shows correct $20.49, but the condition value is 0. I have tried to take off the routine 12 from AltCBV, no change.
Checked for condition exclusion groups, none mentioned.
Is there something I am missing.
Thanks & Regards,
Pavan

hi pavan,
first up, please see the pricing analysis for this condition in the item conditions tab. also let me know if ZLTL is a header or item condition. Anyway, the pricing analysis should give the required clue to check why the did nt get picked. And also if the correct From and to are maintained, if not an approriate alternative calculation type.
And if none of the above works and you feel everything has been verified from the functional side, take the help of your abaper to debug, may be there some customization for the Z condition type.
Regards,
Sadhu Kishore

Main Item net value showing as zero by condition type R100.

Hi Experts,
I am configured free goods, maintained condition record for exclusive free goods.
but in sales order free goods item is not populating and when i see the analysis the requirement 55 not met.
I removed the requirement 55 and i saved it.
Still in the sales order the free goods exclusive item not populating.
and i find that main Item net value showing as zero by condition type R100.
Why system showing the main item amount as zero by condition type R100?
Thanks in advance.

HI ram reddy
you have to maintain R100 requirement -55 it should be there
also Alternative Condition Base value - 28(100% discount)
check your main pricing procedure having conditon type R100 or not if it is not there then maintain
conditon record in VBN1 for NA00 check all the setting(calculation rule)
activate free goods pricing correctly(NA0001)
save it now try
Regards,
Krishna.
Edited by: kris_hna on Jul 14, 2011 11:13 AM
Edited by: kris_hna on Jul 14, 2011 11:31 AM

BAPI_PO_CHANGE, changing condition value in the purchase order

Hi Friends,
I have a requirement,
a flat file is present in the application server that contains the information about PO,PO-ITEM,Condition type, movement type , condition value, plant, storage location .
And i m calling the bapi "BAPI_PO_CHANGE" and passing the po number to it.
the bapi returns the following tables, i_return, i_header,i_cond, i_item,i_itemx.
But the purpose of calling the BAPI is, to check, if the condition value in the specified PO is '0', then it has to replace with the value of condition type present in the flat file.
But when we check the tablei_return, its shows error type.
And the PO is not updated with the new condition value.
Help me out in sorting this problem, by telling me
what value is to be passed to the respective BAPI and what should i do to solve the issue?
and after that i m using a BAPI " BAPI_GOODSMOVEMENT_CREATE".
and it is for the purpose of creating the GR(Goods Receipt),
when i go through the i_return table of the bapi, it si returning a message that "BAPI_201 Unable to create goods movement".
Help me in proving the input to those bapi's and how can i get the expected output?
And let me know, what the bapi's ,"BAPI_COMMIIT" and " BAPI_ROLLBACK" , will be doing?
Edited by: kumar t on Aug 9, 2008 1:02 PM

HI
[Check the Link|http://abap.wikiprog.com/wiki/BAPI_PO_CHANGE]
[Commit|http://abap.wikiprog.com/wiki/BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT]
[Roll Back|http://abap.wikiprog.com/wiki/BAPI_TRANSACTION_ROLLBACK]
Regards
Pavan

Standard Report for PO with Condition Value

HI MM experts,
I have checked all the existing standard reports ME2*, cud not find the report which gives the
condition value means
Eg; PO made on Pencils - Qty 10 NOs. @ Rs. 1/- (incl tax)
condition value for the above is Rs.10, in std sap all reports are showing with net price only
PO no. 45XXXXXXX dt 11.11.2011 - Pencil - qty-10 - Net price Rs.1
Please let us know is there any Standard report which gives the condition value ie., Rs.10 along with or without Net price.

Thank you! It is not meeting my requirement.
I am looking for sap standard report to see the PO value or condition value which is nothing but
Qty X net price. I do not want to touch the tables.
for analysis purpose, i want to have the total PO value in any MM Standard Report.
Today i am visiting every PO and looking at header data for PO value. or at item level Condition value.

Net value showing negative in excise billing for free goods items

Dear All,
Need value suggestions in business scenario.
While issuing Free goods to customer in excise billing ,Net value of ZTNN item showing negative
Inserted R100 % condition type above Tax condtions.
MRP is statistical and accessable value is calculated on MRP.
How to solve the above issue.
Due to the Net value showing negative for Free of charge in excise billing,qty value displaying twice the unit price value in printing
Thanks & Regards
H V Kumar.

Hi
It is depends on your pricing procedure how you defines.
Kindly check once again in your pricing procedure.
Test the cycle once again without entering the R100 condition type in sale order line item and check the next value.
After enter the R100 condition type check the base value to calculate the Amount.

Pricing amount and condition value in sales order

Hi all,
I have noticed for a sales order we are not able to see condition type amount, condition value in sales order even though it shows net price finaly ofr a sales order. Not even able to select the condition lines.
To be specific not able to find value in field KBETR - amount column and KWERT - condition value column
When we go to sales order line item and select condition tab, do see value displayed in Amount and Condition column. Is there are specific reason it is doing visa vis in our production we see both values.
Advise what could be the reason value not getting displayed in Amount and Condition value column.
thanks

It is due to auth for specific columns we have solved the problem.

Condition value is Inactive in sales order

Hi Friends,
I am facing the following problem,
In the sales order, it is picking all condition records as per pricing procedure and calculates perfectly. But in the header net value field it is not updating. It is showing one condition record value only.
During analysis I found that the all records is inactive except which one is updating in the net value field and reason is "Y - Inactive because of Subsequent Price."
Please help me to solve this issue.
Thanks in Advance.
Dilip

Dear Dilip
For information, when you have a condition record showing as
inactive it is because you have a base price condition record
somewhere below your discounts.
Check your condition records below the discounts, are
there any of condition class 'B'? If yes, then that is why they are inactive.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Condition value is not displaying in sales order

Hi Friends,
when i am creating sales order, condition type(JEXP,JECP,JA1X..) is displaying in cond.type column and percentage(14%,2%,1%) is displaying in amount column and
the condition value is not displaying in cond. value column in conitions tab of sales order.
In analysis it is showing as condition record found...
please help me...
with regards

Hi,
can it be that you have a problem with units of measure? Often, if there is no value in Condition value, the problem is in the master data of material. Did you use standard schema? If you not, have you tried it with standard schema? What is your value under "per" and "UoM"?
Regards Thomas

CO-PA: value field correction due to miscalculated SD condition value

HI,
we are using ECC 60 SP11. Due to incorrect condition value calculation in SD this condition value (only used in CO-PA) is posted on a CO-PA value field causing wrong CO-PA results.
As the SD document (invoice) will not be changed anymore a reversal/reposting in CO-PA (ke4s) does not solve the problem.
My idea of value correction (only in CO-PA, I do not care about KEAT in that case...) is to use RKECADL1 to logical delete the old documents and to create a LSMW for ke21n to repost the documents again with the right value for the affected value field.
The question is, the document reference of the old (wrong) CO-PA document shows the billing document and its logical deleted by RKECADL1. My new document does not have a document reference to this billing document as the document source is ke21n.
Any idea how to "change" the document reference in a way that document flow for the billing document shows the ke21n-created document (with the right condition value)?? If I don not change it, document flow will not show any CO-PA document for that case (the old one is logical deleted, the ke21n-doc. is not linked to it)
I want avoid manual changes in Ce1**** as its a dirty solution and I am not completely sure if/which other tables are affected.
Best regards, Christian

The only way to effect the document flow is to cancel and repost the document. if that is not possible then KE21N - Create Line Items will fix your issue in COPA but this will not appear in billing. You can enter data fields that coonect to billing doc etc.
pts appreciated.

Change the Purchase Order : Item - Conditions value

Hi,
How to change the Purchase Order : Item - Conditions value.
In my PO, Item conditions shows the SKTO - Cash Discount value is 0. I want to change the Discount value 10.
How can i change it??

Hi,
Goto the Transaction code MN05 and give the CONDITION TYPE SKTO and change the value
MN05 is the Transaction code for Purchase order condition types.
Please check and revert back if you need more details.
regards,
santosh

Query performance based on condition value

Hi,
I have a simple query which is actually on a view dwdb_dba.actl_partinfo_cust. Please see query bellow
select * from dwdb_dba.actl_partinfo_cust WHERE insertdatetime=(select max(insertdatetime)
from dwdb_dba.actl_partinfo_cust Where system_source='UTS') AND SUPPLIERID='CG1' and Custdevice in ('BT-M2789-C')This query is taking very very long time to return (around 30 records) but if i u
Here if i change the condition "AND SUPPLIERID='CG1'" to "AND SUPPLIERID='DUMMY'", it returns within 3 seconds. Execution plan is same for both then why one query taking too much time and other returning so fast and how can i tune the query against the condition AND SUPPLIERID='CG1' so that it can also return within 3 seconds.
I actualy dont understand the behaviour
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3622663398
| Id | Operation                       | Name                        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |                             |    10 | 42790 |   152K (6)| 00:00:59 |
|* 1 | VIEW                           | ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST          |    10 | 42790 | 59972   (4)| 00:00:23 |
|   2 |   UNION-ALL                     |                             |       |       |            |       |
|* 3 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST_UTS      |     9 | 3429 | 59968   (4)| 00:00:23 |
|* 4 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN            | ACTL_PART_CUST_UTS_IDX3     |   420K|       | 1462 (11)| 00:00:01 |
|* 5 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST_PROMIS_4 |     1 |   311 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 6 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN            | ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST_4_IDX1   |     1 |       |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |   SORT AGGREGATE                |                             |     1 |    14 |            |       |
|   8 |    VIEW                         | ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST          | 1363K|    18M| 92040   (8)| 00:00:36 |
|   9 |     UNION-ALL                   |                             |       |       |            |       |
|* 10 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST_UTS      | 1363K|    33M| 92036   (8)| 00:00:36 |
|* 11 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN          | ACTL_PART_CUST_UTS_IDX1     | 1481K|       | 5528 (10)| 00:00:03 |
|* 12 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST_PROMIS_4 |     1 |    15 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN          | ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST_4_IDX1   |     1 |       |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Thanks

Salman Qureshi wrote:
This query is taking very very long time to return (around 30 records) but if i u
Here if i change the condition "AND SUPPLIERID='CG1'" to "AND SUPPLIERID='DUMMY'", it returns within 3 seconds.
My developer has changed the code of the view which was involved and not it is working fine but still i m curious to know that what could be the reason of this. Same execution plan but only condition value is different. One value returns some rows but returns within few seconds and other condition also returns a few rows but may hours.Salman,
A bit more details would help diagnose the root cause.
If you are still interested in diagnosing the root cause, you may want to provide complete EXPLAIN PLAN output, along with predicate section. If you are on 10g, you may want to provide the output of DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR which will show the actual plan used along with actual number of records generated by each step in the execution plan.
It is possible that SUPPLIERID column data is skewed so that there are less records in table for the value 'DUMMY' but much more number of records for the value 'CG1'. This predicate combined with the other predicate on CUSTDEVICE column may have been resulting in similar number of rows the final query returns.
It is possible that the predicate on CUSTDEVICE is being applied at different stage in the plan than the predicate on SUPPLIERID column.
Edited by: user503699 on Aug 3, 2010 3:11 PM

Max condition value - exceeds while creating a SO

Hi All,
I have a requirement which we are trying to meet up by a solution:-
Requirement:-
A fund value (e.g. 1,00,000) is to be allocated on a particular spend which is offered to customers (e.g. discounts)
So as and when the discounts are offered on the customer orders (SO) the funds value should get depleted
this process goes on and the discounts are offered to the customers, but the total discounts offered till date has reached (98,000), hence when a new order where the discount offered is lets say (5000) it should not allow user to offer it, since it should not go beyond the total fund value i.e. (1,00,000)
Solution:-
Setup:-
A condition type for discount ZCDS is created with "condition update" flag marked
In the condition records of the above condition --> Additional sales data --> Max condition value we will put the total allowed fund of 1,00,000
Transactions:-
Mutliple SO's are created with ZCDS discounts condition types ((1) 30,000 2) 30,000 3) 30,000)
Now in the cumulative values of the ZCDS condition record shows 90,000 for the above 3 orders
Now a new SO is being created with ZCDS valuee of 30,000... IT SHOULD NOT ALLOW TO POPULATE THE ZCDS - CONDITION VALUE OF 30,000 IN THE SO, SINCE IT WILL EXCEED THE TOTAL FUND AMOUNT OF 1,00,000 WHICH IS ALREADY ASSIGNED IN THE "MAX CONDITION VALUE"
ISSUE:-
I am able to create a 4th SO with 30,000 in ZCDS condition type which is updating the "cumulative values" (1,20,000) in the ZCDS condition records as well
QUESTION:-
Can the above scenario met through the solution we have proposed ?
Will the max condition value of 100000 not restrict the condition value in the SO since it is exceeding it ?
Please suggest in case i may have to configure setup additional in it
Appreciate quick replies!
Jimit Shah

Hi
This maximum condition value i have tested some time back
But my results were quiet different
In your example for the 4 th order , when i tested system was taking only 10000 ( the balance of the max condition value)
If we create another order say 5 th order, then for that condition type ZCDS system was taking ZERO value
So it was limiting to the maximum of 100000
But it was allowing us to create N number of orders ( after max condition value was reached )
For those extra orders system was taking zero value for ZCDS ( which i think is meaning less)
When i find time i will test this once again and come back to you
I tested this once again today and found that once the maximum condition value is reached for the rest of orders system was taking the nett value as blank
This is the same with my earlier findings
In your example system will not take it to 120000 if the maximum condition value is set to 100000
If that is happening then there is problem somewhere
and in the condition item details analysis system very clearly tells that MAX value is reached for that condition
MAX condition value is working perfectly
Regards
Raja
Edited by: ramanathan raja on Feb 11, 2011 3:56 PM
Edited by: ramanathan raja on Feb 11, 2011 4:04 PM

Protect Condition Value Column in VA01

I have a security problem on my sales orders: If somebody adds a line and enters the discount Z condition and some number on the value column, SAP updates the Order without going thru the regular checks of discount limit which it does on the amount column.
What I want is to put an if to check if the Amount column its 0, to delete the number on the condition value column, I have tried with ' ' but the value turns to cero and it does not show an error.
Here its the code:
IF xkomv-kbetr = 0.
        MOVE '' TO xkomv-kwert .
        MODIFY xkomv INDEX sy-tabix.
    ENDIF.
Regards,
Carlos
Edit: or if somebody knows how to make screen input = 0 (gray) for the Value Column that would be great.
Edited by: Carlos Salazar on Jul 9, 2010 4:09 PM

turns out 0 its correct as it will not get saved.

How to see planned expenditure/conditional value in PO along with Item rate

Hi
If I need to see a report similar to ME2L, ME2N which will give PO price & value along with planned expenditure/conditional value from purchase order, which transaction to be seen. ME2L will not give planned expenditure seperately.
Regards
Raghu Shetty

hi
there is no standard report which shows the expenditure/conditional value in po. you have to develop your customs report./

Condition value showing negetive

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for