Condition value to calculate on Standard cost

Hi,
The requirement is system to calculate the condition value based on standard price in material master
instead of gross price PB00,how to achieve this?
I created condition type and put the category as G but system is is taking 10% of standard price to calculate
further the condition value
BR
Diwakar

Hi Charlie,
Yes seems bit strange but its the client requirement
I was trying for options to use condition cat.as std.cost ot an internal price
but finally it seems i may have to for routine
Thanks for your answer
any other views welcome

Similar Messages

How to Run a Cost Estimate with Budgeted Values parallel to the Std Cost Estiamte

Hi Experts,
My client want to run a parallel cost estimate with Budgeted values for each type of cost in a similar process like standard cost estimate(currently only Std business run only the std. cost estimate). Below will be provided to run the said cost estimate.
     1. Budgeted Cost for cost elements against each cost center
     2. Re-posting/distribution will be required run to allocate and apportion the cost from service cost centers to Production cost centers
     3. All Planned(future) Material Cost will be provided. (note that the valuation strategy of costing variant of standard cost estimate has below sequence
     4. Budgeted activity quantities will be provided. (Cost and activity qty for Kp06 and Kp26)
Based on the above data business need to run a cost estimate with budgeted values parallel to the standard cost estimate(based on planned values), which will be compared with actual then Budget at each months.
Simply an alternative cost estimate with budgeted values for a given period for all materials.
Kindly advice the possibility of such a cost estimate in the system and if possible pls. mentioned the Process in order and configuration steps for the same.
Thanks in advance.
Aziz

Hi..
You can define costing variants which have valuation variant for budgeted values parallel to the standard cost estimate in Customizing for Product Cost Controlling.
You can define target cost versions using above costing variants under the customizing transaction OKV6 as below picture.
When you calculate variances, you can check “all target cost version” flag to calculate variances for all target cost versions in the controlling area as below picture.
You can analysis the difference between actual cost and several budget cost using target cost version as below picture.

In standard cost estimate the cost of alternative items flowing in full

Hi,
when i calculate the standard cost estimate in repetitiv manufacturing the
complete cost of all alternative items in alternative group is flowing to it.
how to restrict it
thanks in advance
regards
madan

Solution
1. make one of the materail in BOM, as not releavent to costing....depeding on which alternative is better to get the correct std cost
2. Use stargergy 1 usage probnability may be 50% and 50% for alternatives...depending on usage of that material.

CO-PA Cost Component do not match with Standard Cost Component Values

Dear Members,
The CO-PA Cost Components (as mapped through KE4R), do not match with Standard Cost Component values for the Group Currency. In local currency the values match.
System is correctly picking up VPRS value, both in local currency and Group Currency, which is equal to the total of Standard Cost Components however, it is the Value Fields linked to the Standard Cost Components in Group Currency that do not match.
In KE40, the Indicator is 4:Released Standard Cost Estimate matching Goods issue Date.
I have verified KEPH/CKMLPKEPH tables. The values are same as that of VPRS.
Any help/clues?
Regards
Satya

Hi,
In case of billing documents the group valuation approach is managed in the data structures of the legal valuation in additional value fields. To control costs and revenues in the different views separately, you must create additional value fields and assign them to the data structures.
The field contents must be filled via the CO-PA user exit, they cannot be entered by assigning conditions to value fields. The profit center valuation is updated in a separate ledger. No separate value fields are necessary.
The exit to be used is function module 'EXIT_SAPLKEII_002' ( enhancement COPA0005 ). Within the exit you have the complete SD data avaialble in the tables 'T_ACCIT' and 'T_ACCCR'. The conditions can be found in T_ACCIT and the corresponding values ( linked via 'POSNR' ) in table T_ACCCR. The PA line item and the corresponding SD item in table ACCIT
can be mapped via the line item field 'RPOSN' and the field 'POSNR_SD' in table ACCIT.
regards
Waman

SAP transparent table stores condition value of Shipment cost

HI
I need to know which SAP transparent table stores condition value of Shipment cost document (specific for Freight condition which derived from Bulkiness group).
Background:
Minimum load calculation logic
In the pricing procedure for shipment cost we have two conditions: One is ZMIN (similar with SP00) which is having condition class u201CHu201D, Calculation type u201CGu201D which determine Bulkiness group according to access sequence. Bulkiness group is where we define different group with different minimum load. e.g. ZCEM16 u2013 25.TON (22.68) Second condition is ZAFR (Similar with FB00), ZAFR calculates the base value from ZMIN (Compare actual weight with Min weight value of Bulkiness group), if the net weight is 23 ton, it will calculate at 25 ton because of the bulkiness group.
Now I need to know in which table system stores dynamic value of ZMIN? Just like we have PR00 in KONV which we can find from KNUMV of billing / sales order. If I use the same logic then I donu2019t find ZMIN Condition type and value in KONV table for the specific shipment cost document. Please advice how to and from which Table I can find Bulkiness group value of Shipment cost document.
Thanks

Hi,
Get the shipment cost number from shimpment document (document flow or shipment document header).
Goto VFKP table,enter shipment cost number and choose detials. get the document condition number from KNUMV field.
Now goto KONV and enter document condition number and choose details. you can see condition type and value.
Thanks & Regards,
Chandrasekhar

In Sales enquiary stage how system calculate EK02 condition value as cacula

Hi
In Sales enquiary stage how system calculate EK02 condition value as caculated cost
Is there any cofig to get the value of EK02 condition for calculated cost at Enquairy stage only for forcasting
Regards
Santosh

Hi,
In our company we get the calculated cost into our sales document with the following configuration:
IMG: Plant maintenance and customer service / Maintenance and service processing / Basic settings / Quotation creation and billing / ODP4 - Assign conditions to sales document types
With this configuration, we assign the calculated cost condition (EK02) to the corresponding sales document. The system sends the calculated costs from the order to the corresponding sales order created.
Regards,
Óscar
http://blogdesap.blogspot.com

Standard Report for PO with Condition Value

HI MM experts,
I have checked all the existing standard reports ME2*, cud not find the report which gives the
condition value means
Eg; PO made on Pencils - Qty 10 NOs. @ Rs. 1/- (incl tax)
condition value for the above is Rs.10, in std sap all reports are showing with net price only
PO no. 45XXXXXXX dt 11.11.2011 - Pencil - qty-10 - Net price Rs.1
Please let us know is there any Standard report which gives the condition value ie., Rs.10 along with or without Net price.

Thank you! It is not meeting my requirement.
I am looking for sap standard report to see the PO value or condition value which is nothing but
Qty X net price. I do not want to touch the tables.
for analysis purpose, i want to have the total PO value in any MM Standard Report.
Today i am visiting every PO and looking at header data for PO value. or at item level Condition value.

Condition value is not updating in shipment cost documents.

We are creating a shipment cost document and condition value is not updating automatically when we enter the amount.
Regards,
Jagadeesh

Dears,
The material master of the material is not maintained with gross weight and net weight, hence automatic updation for condition value is not taking place, i resolved the issue.
Thanks,
Jagadeesh

How to query the condition value in VPRS

Hello all,
we provide the sales price to customers based on the condition value in "VPRS" ,because I have thousands of goods need the price,so I 'd like to make a query to extract the condition value in "VPRS".
which table is refer to this?
https://mnlylq.bay.livefilestore.com/y1mXNdIiY7VgiU1v3ymS71pxZluGxj4YNp4IFsyQEr1zkoxjm1VCsxpOgbBQ1-ucxiRtA9tC7O_3ZPaQa7qWKGbdnHNX8UzazWTlettENIO7iujggSx7vHjc2bvuIqhYFYb2DEgIjuNaJ5foKU_xF7wvA/%E5%9B%BE%E5%85%AD.jpg?psid
Thanks,
helai

hi,
For your Item category, if you check DETERMINE COST
Determine cost
Indicates whether, during pricing, the system determines the cost (stock value) of a sales document item.
Use
The system checks the cost determination indicator as a requirement before applying the condition type that calculates the cost (condition type VPRS in the standard version of R/3 1.1)
Mainatin VPRS as D then it will automatically pull the price from Material master if maintained
IF VPRS is getting determined, then in your pricing procedure, you can add markup (multiplier)

Excise Duty - Standard Cost Estimate

Hi Experts,
We have defined Excise duty as one of the cost component in the cost component structure. Can some one explain how this Excise duty is posted as planned values in the Standard Cost Estimate ( For material cost quantity from the BOM and price from Material Master is picked up according to the Valuation Variant - defined strategy - similarly for Excise Duty how the system captures the Value).
Please Help - thanks in advance.

Hi
If your Plant is not in an Excise Free Zone - Then You should not add Excise Duty as a cost component because you will be getting credit for the same
If your Plant is in an Excise Free Zone - Then your MAP/Planned Price etc must be inclusive of Excise duty.... This is handled by marking the excise condition as Non Deductible
So, in short, there is no way to show it separate... For Case b, you can use CK74N to add Excise component as Additive cost
br, Ajay M

Problem with rounding in standard cost estimate.

Hi All,
Happy 4th of July!
I have a problem with the standard cost estimate where the system try to calculate overhead costs (from costing sheet) with a fix percentage (9.7%) to the value coming from material consumption costs element.
Let say I have $1.71 material consumption and the overhead rate of 9.7%
The real calculation should be (1.71*0.097) = $0.16587
But at CK11N screen, it shows only $0.16 (two decimal rounding)
Is there a way that I can bump the rounding to at least 3 decimal point to make it more accurate?
Very appreciate any input you guys can share. Thank you.
Charitha

Hi Chari ,
My experience says that you can use only 2 decimals ..
Moreover , please have a look into SAP Note : 639410 - CK11N, CK13N: Message CK869 due to rounding
differences.
There a some source code corrections also on rounding differences- check if it helps you also...
Regards
Sarada

Freight Calculation in Standard cost Run

Hi,
The requirement is while doing the standard cost calculation through CK11N / CK40N system should show seperately how much is freight plan cost &; how much is duty plan cost.e.g.
100 is material price as per condition PB00 Cost element 355100
10 is freight cost (ZFR1 10%) Cost element 363170
5 is duty cost (Zduty lets say 0.5%) Cost element 363171
So taotal cost will be 115
I wanted to get this in cost component wise. Client does not want manual intervention so do not want to go for additive cost method
I had tried through Purchasing info record. I have maintained the valuation variant accordingly. Assigned correct sub strategy to it & also maintained delivery cost button in the same screen to assign conditions to origin group.
Also I had maintained purchasing info record through me11 ; mainteined conditions there.
These above mentioned cost elements are mapped in cost component structure in T code OKTZ. Seperately for material ,freight &; duty
Now when I make a PO, system is showing correct calculation as per the conditions.When I do the GR the Freight &; duty is getting posted &; these GLs are having above mentioned primary cost elements . .So the primary cost element is also getting posted correctly.
Now the problem is
While doing the cost run system shows me Seperate cost for material as 100 , seperate for freight 10 & seperate for duty 5, but to the same cost element i.e. 355100. So all the cost is shown as material cost ; nothing is displayed as freight or duty
If I see the cost element report the corresponding value is flown to the corresponding cost element. But it is not reflecting in proper cost component in cost run
.Please guide me why this is happening. How can I resolve this
Regards,
Abhijit

Hi Ajay,
I was waiting for your reply.
As mentioned by you, I have mapped my cost component structure like Raw material, Freigh, Duty & assigned the corresponding cost elements to it.. But still in itemisation view it shows three values
consumption cost element 355100 - 100
consumption cost element 355100 - 10 (which should go to freight component where I have assigned the Freight cost element)
consumption cost element 355100 -5 (which should go to Duty component where I have assigned the Duty cost element)
FI entries are getting posted correctly. Values are flown to coresponding cost elements.
For the time being We will keep duty part side. We are discussing with client on this.
But, what could be the reason of this problem. How I can achieve the below mentioned result.
Cost component view
Raw material -100
Freight - 10
Duty - 5

Restrict display of Condition Value in the Conditions tab in Purchase Order

Dear All,
We have a requirement that in the Conditions tab the condition value column should be displayed as blank to users other than those related to Purchasing and Costing.
I have checked that there are no standard authorization objects to restrict these.
Any inputs on how to achieve this?
Thanks!
Tejasav

Hi,
you can influence fields using BADI ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST. I don't think that you can disable just your field but you should be able to hide whole tab "Conditions". So you can perform your own authorization check in implementation of this BADI and then display or hide tab.
Cheers

Reg.Calculate Raw material cost(Fabric)+Process cost(semifinished -cutting)

Dear Friends
Please consider our below scenario
In AFS, PO is created and stock is maintained in unrestricted (Raw material)
and then Production order is created for Cut pcs and Raw material is issued to production order through 261 mvt type
next Cut pcs is received against the production order through 101 Mvt type. Now operation cost is not added with the Raw material cost, only the Raw material cost is represents in MIGO-> FOOTER - QUANTITY->Quantity in LC field. What to do to calculate the process cost too.
When we receive the cut pcs what we attached as component to the cutpcs's cost is calculated, the charge for Cutting is not calculated. we want both cutpcs charge(10.00 per pc)+component cost(raw mat. 180.00 per 1 kg)
Cut pcs 10 pcs * 10 Rs = 100 Rs
Raw mat 10 kg * 180 Rs = 1800 Rs
the total cost is 1900 Rs should come in that field
Thanks
Rajakumar.K

Hi,
Process cost is picked up though the activity you maintained in the routing.
Pre requites
1. Activity planning should be done through KP26.
2. Work center should have right formula
3. The standard value key which you using in routing should be there in workcenter formula.
In production order ---> Goto -
> Cost -
> Cost analysis
check whether you getting activity cost(In yours case Cutting cost)
Regards,
Vishal

Material ledger and standard cost estimate

Hi Gurus,
When standard cost estimate is done in a scenario, where material ledger is activated, does the entire stock get revaluated andl post a credit in my P/L? Is it possible to keep my inventory(FG and SFG) at periodic unit price ie at the actual manufacturing price over a longer period say 3 years? Please fill this gap in my understanding.
Best regards
Vimal

Hi Vimal,
Material ledger uses the standard price as 'preliminary price' always during the current month, independent of the question if a new standard price was estimated and released.
But: After period end, when the actual price is calculated the posting will adjust the inventory and P/L accounts to the actual price, with posting date in the recent period.
That means if you have a material that was manufactured once and then consumed over a 3 year period, and during that period you calculate the same material in a standard cost estimate with changing results, that would mean: Looking back at any month during the 3 years the consumption and stock values will be valued at the actual price of manufacturing. But during the currently open period it will always be valuated at the price of the last released cost estimate.
I hope I understood your scenario correct...
Best regards, Udo

Condition value to calculate on Standard cost

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for