Configurabile on a per-message base S/MIME encryption on iOS

Hello,
I'm trying to figure out how to sign or ecnrypt individual mail messages using S/MIME on iPad 2 in the mail app that ships with latest iOS update.
If I set the signing and/or encryption in general settings it will apply to all messages I send, but I only want to be able to do it on individual mesage depending on the sensititvity of the content.
Telling users that they have to go trough a lot of options to do it it's not choice as they will refuse to do it. On blackbeery or android devices you can enable or disable it in the compose message window, which is not the case with the mail app.
Is there something that I'm missing that could help me? Any help is greatly appreciated.
Maybe someone at Apple is reading this and consider a feature development, as I've found other complaints on the internet about this.
Thanks,
Cristian

Hello,
I have just received apple's response on the enhancement i requested using bugreporter. They are saying they have the issues under investigation already, under a different number.
Maybe it won't take them a long time to delevop it and hopefully they will release the feature with the next soon to come versions.
Cheers,
Cristian

Similar Messages

When composing a new message in mail on OS X 10.9.2, is there a way to change the "sending" account on a per-message basis?

I just got a new MacBook Pro and when composing a new message, I can no longer choose which e-mail account I want to use for the new message. It also does not show which account I'm using in the e-mail composition panel. Is there a way to fix this?

Click on the pull down window next to From: and you should be able to select the individual account you want to send from. The account that you want to send from must be an Enabled account in the Account Preferences of Mail.

Mail.app: Select outgoing (SMTP) server per message?

Dear community members,
I'm looking for a solution to the following problem:
I do have multiple e-mail accounts which are configured in the following way: One of them is the master account (let's say [email protected]) added to Mail.app as a POP account. The other ones (let's call them [email protected] and [email protected]) are on different servers and are configured to forward all incoming mail to [email protected] They are, however, not added to Mail.app as additional accounts. That is because it's not necessary for receiving mail with these addresses, since all incoming mail is forwarded to [email protected], anyway, and therefore immediately available in Mail.app.
The problem arises when sending e-mails within Mail.app. I can easily add all three addresses in the "Mail" > "Settings" > "Accounts" settings window by entering them in the e-mail-address-field separated by comma (e.g. "[email protected], [email protected], [email protected]“). This allows me to select the desired outgoing address on a per-message basis in the compose window.
There is, however, a problem with this: This setting means that mail from all three addresses is being sent using the same SMTP server. This can cause problems for domains that do have SPF-records, for example. Therefore, I'd very much prefer to not only select the outgoing mail address on a per-message-basis, but also the SMTP-server I'd like to use. Since Mail.app allows me to add multiple SMTP servers in the account's settings window, I believe there has to be a way to select which one to use on a per-message-basis? Whenever there's a problem with an SMTP-server, a window opens up asking me which of the alternative SMTP servers I'd like to use, instead. This indicates that this function exists – it's just far from obvious for me where to find it in a normal usage scenario.
Does anyone have an idea? Any hint is welcome!
Thanks
Nick

That has nothing to do with it. I ended up working around the problem by changing the account name.
But I still think this is a bug, so I won't mark the topic as answered (a workaround is not the solution).

With per-message S/MIME enabled, the default action when replying to an encrypted message is to send that reply unencrypted. Causes users to accidentally send originally encrypted content, back unencrypted.

This seems counter-intuitive, are we doing something wrong or is this working as expected?
When we have per-message S/MIME enabled on an iOS 8 device. Everything works as expected and we have the ability to select when you are sending an email whether that email should be encrypted or not, but i've noticed that, when you receive an email encrypted with your S/MIME cert, read that email on your iOS8 device with per-message S/MIME enabled, and reply to, or forward, that message, the default action is to send that reply, or forward, unencrypted UNLESS you manually re-tap the little padlock button to re-encrypt the message.
This seems broken. I would imagine we would want the default action when replying or forwarding that encrypted message to be an encrypted reply or forward so as to keep the encryption intact. I can't think of a time when you would actually want to send an unencrypted reply to an encrypted message, as doing so would send the originally encrypted content back, as unencrypted text therefore negating the point of ever encrypting it in the first place.
I know we can set the iOS device to by default send ALL email as encrypted, but that's overkill. Our users probably only get 1 or 2 encrypted emails a week, but when they do get those encrypted email we would want their replies and forwards to those email to also remain encrypted, and not open up the chance of one of these users forgetting to re-check the padlock button thus accidentally sending the originally encrypted content, out as an unencrypted message.
Is this working as expected or are we doing something wrong?

Hi,
Thank you for your clarification.
Yes, it seems you have installed all the updates for the Outlook.
“Testing on a good computer” is a method to narrow down whether the cause is related a specific computer.
For debugging tool, I think we can take a look at:
1. RPCTrace log
2. Process Monitor
For RPCTrace log, it’s not that easy to capture. You must firstly replace some Outlook dll files before you can capture the log. Even more, the dll files can vary if the Outlook
SP versions are different. So, It’s recommend to contact a Microsoft Support to capture and analyze the trace log.
Thanks,
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Simon Wu
TechNet Community Support

Keep mail local on per folder basis

I have multiple email accounts in Mail. One of them is an Exchange account and one of the folders that is shared with me is one called "Public Folders". This folder has sub-folders that I need and sub-folders that I do not need. The sub-folders that I do not need are taking up too much disk space.
In preferences it gives me the option (per account) to download All message and their attachments or not to download message, etc.
Question: Is there a way that I can have that option to download messages or not be on a per folder basis instead of on a per account basis?

No, and you cannot unsubscribe to any mailboxes either. It’s either all or nothing, but setting Keep copies of messages for offline viewing to Only messages I’ve read should be close to what you want, except the junk filter won’t work in that case...

Can I rout audio on a PER APPLICATION basis?

Is there a way (third party software included) to rout audio on a *per application* basis? I'd like internet audio (Safari, etc.) to go to just the normal line out, while iTunes audio would be sent to digital audio out.

I've heard that audio hijack pro can do this.
http://www.rogueamoeba.com/audiohijackpro/
I don't use it myself but check this post for example
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=9299023&#9299023
Message was edited by: V.K.

IMAP: This message is in MIME format...

Since I changed my email accounts on Apple Mail to IMAP instead of POP I occasionally get the following in my emails:
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--B3312272442161992
Content-type: text/plain;
charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,
Consult your solman consultant for authorization key which he has assigned for the particular status
in the status profile in IMG
and then
generate roles from pfcg and in the authorization object B_USERSTAT
assign these keys
finally assign the roles as per ur req
Hope it solve ur prb
Regards
Prakhar

Recordset per message in Sender File Adapter

Hi Friends
I have configured a sender file adapter to pick up *.txt files from a specific path, Since the file is having thousands of records it is failing to process the file at PI level . In order to avoid the problem I have kept Recordset Set Per Message as 10 , but still PI is processing all the records into a single message. Please help me in troubleshooting it.
Regards
Suman.

Hi Suman,
Go thru these threads for troubleshooting...
Massive file
Processing huge file loads through XI
Processing of huge no of Inbound xml files
Bottleneck in Large file processing
How to process large data files in XI ? 100 MB files ?
Regds,
Pinangshuk.

Is there a way we can open/close posting periods on a "per day" basis?

Hi SAP gurus,
Is there a way we can open/close posting periods on a per day basis?
It is not possible in OB52 since it only has control per period and not per day.
Will assign points for suggestions. =) Thanks!

Hii
In standard SAP there is not such functionality where u can do these kind of configuration...it is at least for a month that is through OB52.
If u still wants this functionality it is through the validation.
u need to create the validation for that company code and thn u can use this functionality....
hope it helps u
reward points if helpful
sejal singh

CUPS 8.6 - Supporting Multiple SIP Domains on a per-user basis

Working on a CUPS 8.6 PoC with a customer who currently is running a deployed OCS environment.
Users all sign into a single domain internally but have multiple SMTP domains for email as this customer has many different companies they have aquired.
OCS is able to support and route multiple SIP domains by specifing the SIP address under AD User settings such that two users both signed into the same OCS server can send IM's to each other even though they have different SIP addresses. sip:[email protected] , sip:[email protected]
CUPS on the other hand does not seem to allow this on a per-user basis. It places every user in the sip domain that the server is a member of.
The Jabber client allows you to specify a domain but I am not how this is used as the actual user account in CUPS is only ever the one domain and if you try and specify a different domain in the Jabber Connection Settings, it will not allow you to login.
It is not a big deal for internal communications if everyone is on the same domain, but where it is important is for future B2B IM. Users need to be able to give out THEIR IM address with THEIR respective domain.
Does anyone else know for a fact that I will only be able to have one domain per CUP cluster?
Any thoughts on this design?

Not sure on the design perspective but as for CUPS Domain, we can only have single domain per cluster. As you have already found out that for any user licensed for CUPS, their IM address would be userid@CUPSDomain
CUPS does have funtionality of federating with foreign domains such as AOL/GoogleTalk/WebEx Connect.

Recordsets per Message not working

I found that Recordsets per Message will split the source message into multiple messages and process them separately. This will save my alot of time and is exactly what I need - but it does not work.
I have in my sender file adapter the following parameters in File Content conversion:
Document Name = MT_SND_ZADIG
Document Namespace = urn://federalmogul.com/ADP/FINFRADP001/00
Recordset Name = RECORDSET
Recordset Structure = RECORDSET,*
Recordset Sequence = Ascending
Recordsets per Message = 10
Key Field Type = String (case-sensitive)
RECORDSET.fieldNames RECORDCODE,ACCOUNTID,CONST_E,CONST_Z2M,MONTHYEAR,JOURNALCODE,FOLIOCODE,RECORDTYPE,DAY,GLACCOUNT,CODINGBLOCK,DEBITAMOUNT,CREDITAMOUNT,TEXT,FILLER1,FILLER2,ACCREF1,ACCREF3,EMPLOYEENO,REPORTTYPE,ZADIGCODE,ACC_TYPE,RESERVED,CENTURY
RECORDSET.fieldFixedLengths 2,6,1,3,4,3,2,1,2,12,18,13,13,20,8,8,12,12,6,4,6,1,1,2
RECORDSET.lastFieldsOptional yes
When I feed in a file with 77 records I would expect it to split it into 7 * 10 recordset and then 1 * 7 - why is it not doing this?

Hi Lynn,
And... what is the result you are getting?
Try to change Recordset Structure with something different that Recorset name.
Something like:
Recordset Name = RECORDSET
Recordset Structure = row,*
row.fieldNames RECORDCODE,ACCOUNTID,CONST_E,CONST_Z2M,MONTHYEAR,JOURNALCODE,FOLIOCODE,RECORDTYPE,DAY,GLACCOUNT,CODINGBLOCK,DEBITAMOUNT,CREDITAMOUNT,TEXT,FILLER1,FILLER2,ACCREF1,ACCREF3,EMPLOYEENO,REPORTTYPE,ZADIGCODE,ACC_TYPE,RESERVED,CENTURY
row.fieldFixedLengths 2,6,1,3,4,3,2,1,2,12,18,13,13,20,8,8,12,12,6,4,6,1,1,2
row.lastFieldsOptional yes
Follow the example is described in:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/2c/181077dd7d6b4ea6a8029b20bf7e55/content.htm
Regards,
Carlos

Restrict access to buttons, regions, etc. on a per user basis?

My application restricts access to buttons, regions, etc. on a per user basis.
Here is my application logic...
1. A User can only edit items they own.
2. A Super-User can edit all items
So, when a user logs in, I use a post-authentication process to set the user ID to an application level item.
Now, for example, to have an edit button display on a page, I need to check the item's owner ID against the application level user ID...and check to see if this user is on the Super User list via a query.(which could be set to another application level item upon login...I guess)
Question...What is the best way to do this? Conditional display? Authorization scheme?
Would something like the following work for a Conditional Display?
Condition: SQL Expression
&USER_ID.=&P6_ITEM_OWNER_ID. OR USER_ID in (select USER_ID from table where USER_ID=&USER_ID.)
How would I do this with an Authorization Scheme? (I like the idea of updating the logic in single location...but I'm not sure if it is possible because I have to check PX_OWNER_ID would be different on each page.)

Hi Denes,
Thanks for your code which allows user to edit (if authorized) and view (if not).
But some how - I do not get the image to show up - instead it show a small underline.
From SQL point of view - here is what I get - when i run the sql
'<img src="/i/ed-item.gif">',2,CR TEST,,,,dune2.cit.cornell.edu,CRDMTEST.CIT.CORNELL.EDU,PSPROD,,,CRDMTEST
Here is my wrap_image function
create or replace function wrap_image(p_user_name in varchar2,p_dm_name_id in number)
return varchar2 IS
v boolean := False;
ret_val varchar2(1000);
begin
dbms_output.put_line('user='||p_user_name);
dbms_output.put_line('dm_name='||p_dm_name_id);
-- Check authorization if the user is super user - return true, else if he has edit priv on dm_name_id - return true - else false
v:=ACL_DMTOOLS_DM_PRIV(p_user_name,p_dm_name_id);
if v then
ret_val := '<img src="/i/ed-item.gif">';
ret_val := ''''||ret_val||'''';
dbms_output.put_line('TRUE');
else
ret_val := '';
dbms_output.put_line('FALSE');
end if;
return ret_val;
end;
Thanks for your great educational site.
Regards
atul

Sender File Adapter cannot send single record per message ?

Hi,
I have scenario flat file to jdbc. but then why the sender file adapter didn't split the record to become single record per message eventhough i have set it in "Recordsets Per Message" = 1. ?
Document Name               MT_APINVOICE
Document Namespace          urn:file:jdbc:apivinvoice
Document Offset               8
Recordset Name               INPUT
Recordset Namespace
Recordset Structure                          RECORD,*
Recordset Sequence                          Ascending
Recordset per Message          1
Key Field Name
Key field Type               String
RECORD.fieldFixedLengths     10,5,10,10
RECORD.endSeparator     'nl'
RECORD.fieldNames          F1,F2,F3,F4
Please advise
Thank You and Best Regards
Fernand

>>but then how to make for example more then 1 records per message.
like 10 records per message. should i set RECORD,10 ?
That is right. Just try it out yourself.
@Shesagiri,
Number of record is decided by the parameter Recordset structure and number of recordset with in a message is decided by Recordset per Message.
Regards
Jaishankar

File SENDER - "Recordsets per message" being ignored..

Hi
I have a file to file scenario
Sender file:
A1,A2,A3
B1,B2,B3
I want to split the SENDER/SOURCE file in the adapter (NO BPM) so that I am creating n number of RECEIVER files - ONE for each line.
I am trying to use content conversions and setting "Recordsets per message" to 1 but it is completely ignoring this. and ONLY creating 1 file.
I am NOT using any mapping and we are running PI 7.0
Please help
Cheers

Hi
As per my knwoledge you can split files at mapping level in integration engine but at adapter engine you are trying that is FCC which will just convert the data into XML.In FCC it will never split files, you have to do it at mapping level.
Kindly check this link:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/600b455f-01cd-2b10-0cab-a50e47a8f800?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
this is a step by process for your query.
Regards,
Nutan

RecordSets per message

Hi
Im doing a file to file scenario with content conversion. I have 10000 records in the file and i need to split the file using Recordsets per message option. I gave the value as 1000. In SXMB_MONI im getting 10 messages with proper payload. but in the target directory i can see 10 different files with only one (first) record in it.
Im using this configuration
Recordset Name = (left this empty)
Recordset Structure = RECORDSET,1
specified parameter ignoreRecordsetName to true
Did i miss anything

My source and target structure are same
   <Record> -- 0 to unbunded
      <Row>   -- 0 ro unbounded
            <Type/>
            <Org/>
            <Datel/>
       </Row>
       <Row>
            <Type/>
            <Org/>
            <Datel/>
       </Row>
         10000 nodes
   </Record>
Im using the following in the CC
Recordset Name:Record
Recordset structure:Row,1000
Recordset per message:1
This is working fine. I mean ini SXMB moni im getting correct structure as expected. But the all the files in the target directory have only first 1000 records.. what i see in moni is different from what the files have

Configurabile on a per-message base S/MIME encryption on iOS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for