Configuration issue with ISMBP_CREATE IDOC

Hi Experts,
Currently my client is creating Business Partners through BP transaction.
The issue now we have is that create and changes made using a BAPI for creation BAPIBUSISM007_CREATEFROMDATA and change BAPIBUSISM007_CHANGE.
For both bapis i have find message type and basic types.
BP creation: Message type ISMBP_CREATE and basic type ISMBP_CREATE01
BP change :Message type ISMBP_CHANGE adn basic type ISMBP_CHANGE01
Now i am using existed partner profiles, partner profile LS -> added message type and basic types in outbound parameters.
Then i have added this BAPI IDOC details in distribution model Add BAPI using the old distribution model.
Now i am creating BP using Bapi in my system business partners are creating but IDOCs are not triggering.
Please help me.
Thanks,
Anji

Hi,
I got solution my self.
By doing below steps we can get it work.
Business Partner IDOCs will be generate in the both create and change time, for this we have to call BAPIBSUISM007_SAVEPROXIES. The input of this function module is business partner only.

Similar Messages

HFM 11.1.2.3 Configuration - Issue with Consolidation Administration

Hi,
This is regarding a new/fresh installation EPM 11.1.2.3 and have an issue with configuration on HFM; the deployment is distributed as below
1) Server 1 : Foundation,WebLogic Admin(/OHS) - Workspace/Shared Services/Planning/Calc Manager/EAS/APS
2) Server 2: Essbase
3) Server 3 : EPMA/HSF/HFM(FDMee/DRM-Yet, to be installed and configured) - Hadnt used these products and this is totally new to me.
We have issues with HFM - and while opening the Consolidation Administration.
We get an error as below, in workspace
An unexpected error has occured.Check server log or contact your system administrator for more information.
The web app logs suggested below errors- This is only part of the error log
E:\Oracle\Middleware\user_projects\domains\EPMSystem\servers\HFMWeb0\logs\oracle-adf.log
Part of log
oracle.adf.model.adapter.DataControlFactoryImpl] [SRC_METHOD: createSession] Exception: [[
oracle.adf.model.adapter.AdapterException: DCA-29000: Unexpected exception caught: oracle.epm.fm.common.exception.HFMException, msg=There is no registered cluster or server
I hadnt configured 'Configure Cluster' during the HFM configuration; this was a mistake being new to HFM.
On a further readup online on OTN etc, found that an application cluster is a must have on HFM, even if it is for one server.
Have one confusion now for fixing this,
Do a configuration only for 'Configure Cluster', and restart services to fix this issue
or
Do a configuration for 'Configure Cluster'and then again re-Configure HFM components
Configure > Financial Management — Configure Cluster
Re-Configure > Financial Management — Configure Application Server
Re-Configure > Financial Management — Configure Web Server
Re-Configure > Financial Management — Configure Web Application
Re-Configure > Financial Management — Enable Smart View Provider
Re-Configure > Financial Management — Enable Life Cycle Management Provider
Re-Configure > Financial Management — Enable Web Services

Got help from Oracle Support, and this problem is now resolved. The HFM app server was configured fine, earlier.
Had to follow below steps on the EPM configurator.
Stop Services
HFM - Configure Cluster
HFM - Configure Web Server
HFM - Deploy to App Server
Foundation - Configure Web Server.
Start Services
Refresh workspace

Configuration issue with Response processor

Please assist with my issue
I am having the following issue with
ALPPIM module: Response Processor
Current system time is 17-FEB-2010 10:00:30
wferr:
- 2008: Could not open unprocessed mail folder.
- 2106: Could not open folder '&FOLDER'. NAME=/apps11510/prod/prodappl/alr/11.5.0/resource/REVIEWED_PARSING
- 2207: Mail service could not open folder.
- 207: Could not open file '/apps11510/prod/prodappl/alr/11.5.0/resource/REVIEWED_PARSING'.

Hello guys,
Thought i'd provide an update on my status.
The unix team came back to us saying that IMAP server is NOT installed in these environments at all.
So i little research on my part brought me across
How To Configure The Workflow Java Mailer Without An IMAP Account (Assumes No Inbound Processing) [ID 268274.1]
Using the above metalink note above i configured and started the mailers and everything is running fine as expected.
So thanks again for the help guys.
However before i started the mailers i had around a million messages in ready state under the queue WF_DEFFERED,
after the mailers were started this number gradually came down but is now stuck at 3000.
Now i am just wondering why these 3000 messages didnt clear up like the rest.
Another thing that i noticed is that agent listener
"Workflow Deferred Agent Listener" has a system deactivated status because of 'Maximum number of errors occured'
however i could not understand what were the errors that occured maximum number of times.
The following is from 'Workflow Deferred Agent Listener' log
LOG_ID_UNKNOWN : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.Logger.Logger(String, int) : Logging to System.out until necessary parameters are retrieved for Logger to be properly started.
LOG_ID_UNKNOWN : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsm.GSMSvcComponentContainer.initializeStateMachine() : BEGIN
LOG_ID_UNKNOWN : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.getNewWorkflowContext() : BEGIN
LOG_ID_UNKNOWN : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.getNewWorkflowContext() : BEGIN
LOG_ID_UNKNOWN : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.loadGlobalParameters() : BEGIN
LOG_ID_UNKNOWN : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsm.GSMSvcComponentContainer.loadContainerParameters() : BEGIN
LOG_ID_UNKNOWN : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.start() : Successfully retrieved global and container parameters
LOG_ID_UNKNOWN : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.validateParameterValues(Properties) : BEGIN
LOG_ID_UNKNOWN : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.validateParameterValues(Properties) : ({SVC_COMP_MAX_ERROR_COUNT=10, SVC_COMP_MONITOR_LOOP_SLEEP=60, SVC_CONTAINER_LOOP_SLEEP=10, SVC_CONTAINER_READ_TIMEOUT=10, SVC_COMP_MONITOR_ONDEMAND_FREQ=300, SVC_CONTAINER_LOG_LEVEL=4, SVC_WRITE_DIAG_TO_GSM_LOG=Y})
LOG_ID_UNKNOWN : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.start() : Successfully validated container parameters
LOG_ID_UNKNOWN : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsm.GSMSvcComponentContainer.loadDetails(Connection) : BEGIN (oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleConnection@19e8f17)
LOG_ID_UNKNOWN : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.start() : Successfully retrieved container details
LOG_ID_UNKNOWN : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsm.GSMSvcComponentContainer.startLogger() : BEGIN
LOG_ID_UNKNOWN : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.startLogger() : BEGIN [default implementation]
SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706-10002 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.Logger.Logger(String, int) : Logging to System.out until necessary parameters are retrieved for Logger to be properly started.
SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706-10022 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.Logger.Logger(String, int) : Logging to System.out until necessary parameters are retrieved for Logger to be properly started.
SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706-10003 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.Logger.Logger(String, int) : Logging to System.out until necessary parameters are retrieved for Logger to be properly started.
SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706-10004 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.Logger.Logger(String, int) : Logging to System.out until necessary parameters are retrieved for Logger to be properly started.
SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706-10002 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.Logger.Logger(String, int) : Logging to System.out until necessary parameters are retrieved for Logger to be properly started.
,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.start()]:Successfully named container session (took logical lock)
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:56 AM EST]:1323186116207:Thread[main,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.start()]:Successfully started the Component Monitor thread
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:56 AM EST]:1323186116235:Thread[ComponentMonitor,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentMonitor.performInit()]:Successfully initialized -> SvcComponentMonitor{Processor{mThread=Thread[ComponentMonitor,5,main],mCurrentLoopSleep=0,mMinLoopSleep=60,mMaxLoopSleep=0,mReadTimedOutFlag=false,mCurrentErrorCount=0,mMaxErrorCount=-2147483648,mErrorLoopSleep=60,mErrorFlag=false,mControlEvent=noEvent,mStopFlag=false,mSuspendFlag=false,mLastSuspendFlag=false},mCurrentLoopCount=4,mOnDemandLoopCount=5}
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:56 AM EST]:1323186116236:Thread[ComponentMonitor,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.Processor.run()]:Processor has successfully been initialized. Loop will now start.
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:56 AM EST]:1323186116263:Thread[main,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.start()]:Successfully started the state machine
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:56 AM EST]:1323186116266:Thread[GSMQueueProcessor,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.Processor.run()]:Processor has successfully been initialized. Loop will now start.
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:56 AM EST]:1323186116284:Thread[main,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.start()]:Successfully started the container -> SvcComponentContainer{mComponentControlWorkflowContext=[oracle.apps.fnd.wf.apps.WorkflowContext@1a7508a $Revision: 115.178 $ extends [oracle.apps.fnd.common.Context@1a7508a $Revision: 115.44 $ {sessionId=0x1a7508a,conn=oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleConnection@1acd47}] {isDedicated=false}],mComponentMonitor=SvcComponentMonitor{Processor{mThread=Thread[ComponentMonitor,5,main],mCurrentLoopSleep=0,mMinLoopSleep=60,mMaxLoopSleep=0,mReadTimedOutFlag=true,mCurrentErrorCount=0,mMaxErrorCount=-2147483648,mErrorLoopSleep=60,mErrorFlag=false,mControlEvent=noEvent,mStopFlag=false,mSuspendFlag=false,mLastSuspendFlag=false},mCurrentLoopCount=5,mOnDemandLoopCount=5},mStateMachine=[email protected]c2,mLogger=Logger{mLog=[$Header: AppsLog.java 115.76 2004/07/27 17:30:17 kkapur ship $ @5807702 {oracle.apps.fnd.profiles.ExtendedProfileStore@3411a}],mUniqueId=SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706,mLevel=4},mParameters={SVC_COMP_MAX_ERROR_COUNT=10, SVC_COMP_MONITOR_LOOP_SLEEP=60, SVC_CONTAINER_LOOP_SLEEP=10, SVC_CONTAINER_READ_TIMEOUT=10, SVC_COMP_MONITOR_ONDEMAND_FREQ=300, SVC_CONTAINER_LOG_LEVEL=4, SVC_WRITE_DIAG_TO_GSM_LOG=Y},mProcessId=149706,mType=GSM,mName=WFALSNRSVC,mComponents={},mAutomaticComponentErrorCounts=null,mEventSubscriptions=[oracle.apps.fnd.wf.bes.Subscription@1e228bc, oracle.apps.fnd.wf.bes.Subscription@e06940, oracle.apps.fnd.wf.bes.Subscription@11e0c13, oracle.apps.fnd.wf.bes.Subscription@1aae94f, oracle.apps.fnd.wf.bes.Subscription@1bb5c09]}
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:56 AM EST]:1323186116560:Thread[ComponentMonitor,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentMonitor.startAutomaticComponents()]:Starting automatic component 10002
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:56 AM EST]:1323186116815:Thread[ComponentMonitor,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentMonitor.startAutomaticComponents()]:Starting automatic component 10003
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:56 AM EST]:1323186116848:Thread[ComponentMonitor,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentMonitor.startAutomaticComponents()]:Starting automatic component 10004
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:56 AM EST]:1323186116883:Thread[ComponentMonitor,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentMonitor.startAutomaticComponents()]:Starting automatic component 10005
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:56 AM EST]:1323186116915:Thread[ComponentMonitor,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentMonitor.startAutomaticComponents()]:Starting automatic component 10022
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:56 AM EST]:1323186116950:Thread[ComponentMonitor,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentMonitor.startAutomaticComponents()]:Starting automatic component 10023
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:57 AM EST]:1323186117275:Thread[BES Dispatch Thread,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.onBusinessEvent(BusinessEvent)]:(BusinessEvent{name=oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponent.start, key=SVC:06-DEC-2011, priority=50, correlationId=null, sendDate=Tue Dec 06 10:41:56 EST 2011, receiveDate=null, From Agent: , To Agent: , Last Subscription= , Error Message=null, Error Stack=null, [email protected], COMPONENT_ID=10002, CONTAINER_PROCESS_ID=149706, CONTAINER_TYPE=GSM, BES_PAYLOAD_OBJECT=false})
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:57 AM EST]:1323186117287:Thread[BES Dispatch Thread,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.handleComponentEvent(int, String, String)]:Successfully retrieved component details from the database
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:57 AM EST]:1323186117578:Thread[BES Dispatch Thread,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.onBusinessEvent(BusinessEvent)]:Successfully handled component event, oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponent.start, for component 10002
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:57 AM EST]:1323186117580:Thread[BES Dispatch Thread,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.onBusinessEvent(BusinessEvent)]:(BusinessEvent{name=oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponent.start, key=SVC:06-DEC-2011, priority=50, correlationId=null, sendDate=Tue Dec 06 10:41:56 EST 2011, receiveDate=null, From Agent: , To Agent: , Last Subscription= , Error Message=null, Error Stack=null, [email protected], COMPONENT_ID=10022, CONTAINER_PROCESS_ID=149706, CONTAINER_TYPE=GSM, BES_PAYLOAD_OBJECT=false})
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:57 AM EST]:1323186117586:Thread[BES Dispatch Thread,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.handleComponentEvent(int, String, String)]:Successfully retrieved component details from the database
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:58 AM EST]:1323186118078:Thread[BES Dispatch Thread,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.onBusinessEvent(BusinessEvent)]:Successfully handled component event, oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponent.start, for component 10022
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:58 AM EST]:1323186118080:Thread[BES Dispatch Thread,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.onBusinessEvent(BusinessEvent)]:(BusinessEvent{name=oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponent.start, key=SVC:06-DEC-2011, priority=50, correlationId=null, sendDate=Tue Dec 06 10:41:56 EST 2011, receiveDate=null, From Agent: , To Agent: , Last Subscription= , Error Message=null, Error Stack=null, [email protected], COMPONENT_ID=10003, CONTAINER_PROCESS_ID=149706, CONTAINER_TYPE=GSM, BES_PAYLOAD_OBJECT=false})
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:58 AM EST]:1323186118086:Thread[BES Dispatch Thread,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.handleComponentEvent(int, String, String)]:Successfully retrieved component details from the database
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:58 AM EST]:1323186118258:Thread[BES Dispatch Thread,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.onBusinessEvent(BusinessEvent)]:Successfully handled component event, oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponent.start, for component 10003
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:58 AM EST]:1323186118260:Thread[BES Dispatch Thread,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.onBusinessEvent(BusinessEvent)]:(BusinessEvent{name=oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponent.start, key=SVC:06-DEC-2011, priority=50, correlationId=null, sendDate=Tue Dec 06 10:41:56 EST 2011, receiveDate=null, From Agent: , To Agent: , Last Subscription= , Error Message=null, Error Stack=null, [email protected], COMPONENT_ID=10004, CONTAINER_PROCESS_ID=149706, CONTAINER_TYPE=GSM, BES_PAYLOAD_OBJECT=false})
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:58 AM EST]:1323186118266:Thread[BES Dispatch Thread,5,main]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.SvcComponentContainer.handleComponentEvent(int, String, String)]:Successfully retrieved component details from the database
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:58 AM EST]:1323186118418:Thread[inboundThreadGroup1,5,inboundThreadGroup]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:ERROR:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706-10002 : oracle.apps.fnd.wf.bes.AgentListenerProcessor.read()]:10consecutive errors occurred
[Dec 6, 2011 10:41:58 AM EST]:1323186118422:Thread[inboundThreadGroup1,5,inboundThreadGroup]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:ERROR:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706-10002 : oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsc.Processor.performError(ProcessorException)]:Maximum number of errors have occurred for this processing thread.
[Dec 7, 2011 9:57:06 AM EST]:1323269826687:Thread[inboundThreadGroup1,5,inboundThreadGroup]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706-10000 : oracle.apps.fnd.wf.bes.AgentListenerProcessor.listen()]:WF_EVENT.listen returned processed count: 0, error count: 0
[Dec 7, 2011 9:57:06 AM EST]:1323269826689:Thread[inboundThreadGroup1,5,inboundThreadGroup]:0:-1:sun-ofs:10.84.34.23:-1:-1:EXCEPTION:[SVC-GSM-WFALSNRSVC-149706-10000 : oracle.apps.fnd.wf.bes.AgentListenerProcessor.read()]:Successfully listened from ECX_INBOUND

Configuration Issue with my Cisco 871 Router

Hi all,
I am a newbie to the Cisco IOS.
I got a Cisco 871 Router that I'd like to use for internet connection. My LAN network is 192.168.1.0/24 and the ISP has assigned us the IP 41.212.79.108/24 and gateway 41.212.79.1.
With my current configuration, I can hit the router - 192.168.1.1 - and it's WAN port - 41.212.79.108 - but not the gateway.
Below is my current config:
Hoggers#show config
Using 4414 out of 131072 bytes
version 12.4
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname Hoggers
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
logging buffered 51200 warnings
enable secret 5 **********************.
no aaa new-model
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-568493463
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-568493463
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-568493463
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-568493463
certificate self-signed 01 nvram:IOS-Self-Sig#7.cer
dot11 syslog
ip cef
no ip dhcp use vrf connected
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.10.1
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.1
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.2
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.3
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.4
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.5
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.6
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.7
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.8
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.9
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.10
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.100
ip dhcp excluded-address 192.168.1.90
ip dhcp pool ccp-pool
   import all
   network 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.248
   default-router 10.10.10.1
   lease 0 2
ip dhcp pool LANPOOL
   network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
   default-router 192.168.1.1
   dns-server 41.212.3.2 41.212.3.253
ip domain name yourdomain.com
ip name-server 41.212.3.2
ip name-server 41.212.3.253
archive
log config
hidekeys
interface FastEthernet0
interface FastEthernet1
interface FastEthernet2
interface FastEthernet3
interface FastEthernet4
description Wan to Outside World
ip address 41.212.79.108 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
interface Vlan1
description $ETH-SW-LAUNCH$$INTF-INFO-HWIC 4ESW$
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip tcp adjust-mss 1452
ip forward-protocol nd
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 41.212.79.1
ip http server
ip http access-class 23
ip http authentication local
ip http secure-server
ip http timeout-policy idle 60 life 86400 requests 10000
ip dns server
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.31 80 interface FastEthernet4 80
access-list 23 permit 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.7
no cdp run
control-plane
scheduler max-task-time 5000
end
I'll appreciate any light you can shed on what am missing.

2 wireless routers can not communicate wirelessly with each other.
You need to connect cable between 2 routers and use the second wireless router as access point.
Follow this link to connect Linksys router to another router.
Some of your devices are getting same IP address. This might be the issue with DHCP server of the router. You can try DHCP reservation on the router so that each device will get unique IP address.

Issue with ORERS05 IDOC sending immediately after Purchase Order creation.

Hello,
When output mode of an outbound partner profile was setup as Transfer
immediately then when ever EDI output is generated in Purchase Order then
system creates IDOC and sends immediately out of system. But middle
ware has received only control record and whole data records were missing in IDOC file received by middle ware and we were receiving status 29 back from middle ware.
Right now we changed outbound partner profile, output mode was set to
Collect IDOC's and we are running RSNAST00 program in background to send those IDOC's but we
were looking into go for first option to send idoc out of system as soon EDI output is generated in Purchase Order.
Is there any way of fixing this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Prasad

Yes, I'm facing with PO IDOC only and as I said it is not issue with middle ware as they were receiving only IDOC control record.
If I resend same idoc by setting status back to 30 they were able to receive whole IDOC and more over if we set partner profile to Collect IDOC and schedule back ground job every 5mins then middleware was bale to get whole idoc.
Looks like it is SAP issue as this the message I got from SAP.
The problem only exists if the messages are supposed to be output by
means of transmission time-spot
4, that is 'immediately' (during the saving of the application).
With the output of the change message, the change documents are read for the purchasing document (all as of the last successful transmission).
With the transmission time-spot 4, it can occur that the change
documents do not physically exist on the database yet. No change message can be generated in this case and the system generates message ME140 or ME760 in the message log.

Apple Configurator issue with iPad Air

I am using Apple configurator 1.5 to deploy iPad 2 with 4G and without and iPad Airs with 4G.
I created backups of each model and I’m only having an issue with the iPad Airs. I get an error “ unable to activate ”. Apple configurator will update the devices to the newest OS and reset the iPads but it won’t apply any settings from the backup.
Any help would be great.

Sorry for the confusion, I have one backup for each model. The iPad Airs are able to use cellular data but they are not going to be activated with the carrier ( Verizon ). We are only using them with WiFi. The issues is Apple Configurator stops working as soon as it tries to activate and won’t push the backup. Apple Configurator is only able to resetting and updating the OS. This only happen with the Airs, I use the same process with iPad 2 with cellular data, not activated with the carrier ( Verizon ) no issues. I don’t currently have an iPad Air but remember it was error 2 “ unable to activate ”.

Issue with PO IDOC

Hi,
IDOCs for creation and change of PO is done successfully. But when I try to delete a particular line item in the PO (ME22N), the IDOC is not generated and when I try to issue the output manually, an error message No Items Found is displayed.
Please let me know how to do testing for deletion of IDOC and also let me know whether generation of an IDOC is possible when there is deletion in the PO or not?
Helpful answers will be rewarded.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Phani Kumar. S

Hi
have u configured the msg type ORDCHG in the outbound parameter of the Partner profile with the correspoding message control parameters?
If so try to trigger the idoc manually form PO transaction.
Cheers,
Hakim
Mark all useful answers

Performance issue with custom IDOC download into SAP MII

Hi,
We have a custom IDOC which has ten fields. We take the data from these ten fields and insert into database. The issue is
we have some where around 4500 idocs flowing into SAP MII and then from SAP MII to sql database. The time taken for these idocs is around 30 mins.
Is there a way where we can improve the performance in terms of time taken?
Additional information is
MaxReaderThreadCount has been set to 5 in Configuration Management -> Infrastructure -> Application Resources
sample idoc structure
<IDOCNAME>
<FIELD1>val1</FIELD1>
<FIELD10>val2</FIELD10>
</IDOCNAME>
Please let us know if more information is needed.
Regards,
Manish Jain

Hi Manish,
My thinking about the queuing is that for each transaction, you are calling your database and passing in the IDoc content. Depending upon your system, database, transactions, etc., you may be having to establish a connection between MII and the database each time you process an IDoc. Each "handshake" takes a finite amount of time. So queuing up the IDocs, establishing a single DB connection and processing large numbers of IDocs in a batch might reduce your processing time substantially. Something worth investigating.
I don't think that adding additional IDoc Listeners for different IDoc types will work if the source ECC system is the same for each type. It will simply use the first one it finds and process all the types there.
Additional threads may improve performance and is certainly a low risk, easily implemented test. Just do it in small increments as you can add too many threads (check with the NW administrator) and lock up your NW system.
And you may want to check with your DBA to see if there are limits on the connections which MII can establish for uploading the IDoc content (or for that matter, any other improvements to be made on the DB side).
Regards,
Mike
Edited by: Michael Appleby on Feb 10, 2012 2:37 PM

Java IDOC_AAE configuration issue in PI IDOC sender channel and in ECC SM58.

Dear Experts,
My configuration scenario is outbound: SAP (IDOC)-------->PI------->AS2 ThirdParty.
SAP PI version: 7.31 dual stack.
First time i have done IDOC_AAE settings done in ECC and PI NWA with the help of below links.
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-34155
http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-31398
While sending the DESADV.DELVRY05 standard idoc from ECC to PI i am getting below error in Sender IDoc channel.
Could you please help me on this issue ,I will appriciate you .This is very urgent.
Error in PI IDOC Sender channel : Processing error = Value with name ApplyCntlRecFromPayload not available
and I are getting below error in SM58 ECC system.
Error in ECC SM58: Commit fault: ASJ.ejb.005043 (Failed in component:
Thanks,
Aadi

Hi Aadi,
Please check the below SAP notes
1952406 - "Commit fault" error in SM58 transaction when sending IDOC from backend system to PI sender Java IDOC adapter
1928302 - Possible NullPointerException with IDOC_AAE sender channels processing
reference - Commit fault: ASJ.ejb.005043 (Failed in component: sap.com/com.sap.aii.ad) while sending to PI system
also check the link - http://saphelp.me/commit-fault-asj-ejb-005043/
regards,
Harish

Issue with DEBMAS IDoc,not all fields are reflected in the IDoc Seg E1KNB1M

For IDoc type DEBMAS, there is a segment E1KNB1M. This segment is relate to the customer correspondence details (XD02 -> company code data -> Correspondence).
For any change to the customer master a DEBMAS IDoc is triggered which has data in segments including the E1KNB1M.
In my case for few customers, the not all fields in the segment E1KNB1M contain data. Few fields contain data but the rest are filled with u2018\u2019. This is happening only in the production system, for the same customer in the quality system the data is there as required.
I checked in debugging, and found that the data is correctly passed to the segment in program SAPLVV01 Include LVV01F01. And the segment contains data till the IDoc is triggered. I.e. the fields are not getting cleared at any point.
Can anyone suggest what is happening and how to fix this? Please note that the issue is only in the production system and not in the quality system ( for the same customer).

BTT... Need some help on the above

Php configuration issue with libmysqlclient

Hi ,
I am getting below issue while configuring php 5.3.3 with below command
./configure --with-apxs2=/local/apps/rxapi/apache/bin/apxs --with-openssl --with-mysql=/opt/mysql/mysql --enable-dbase --with-libdir=lib/64 --prefix=/local/apps/rxapi/php5.5.3 --with-config-file-path=/local/apps/rxapi/php5.5.3 --disable-cgi --with-gd --with-zlib --with-gettext --with-gdbm
checking for MySQL support... yes
checking for specified location of the MySQL UNIX socket... no
configure: error: Cannot find libmysqlclient under /opt/mysql/mysql.
Note that the MySQL client library is not bundled anymore!

Unless you have a specific need to use libmysqlclient, then use PHP's mysqlnd driver instead. Configure PHP by using --with-mysql=mysqlnd. See MySQL :: MySQL 5.6 Reference Manual :: 22.9.5 MySQL Native Driver (Mysqlnd) and PHP: Mysqlnd - Manual
Also unless you really, really, really need the old insecure 'mysql' extension then use either mysqli or PDO_MYSQL instead. These can be configured with --with-mysqli=mysqlnd and --with-pdo-mysql=mysqlnd

Apache2.2 Plugin configuration issue with Weblogic 9.2

Hi All,
We are trying to configure apache plugin for weblogic 9.2 (Apache Proxying for Weblogic) in Solaris Spark. When we are testing the httpd.conf configuration using apachectl configtest we are getting following error.
httpd: Syntax error on line 80 of /data/httpserv/apache-2.2.10/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load /data/httpserv/apache-2.2.10/modules/mod_wl_22.so into server: ld.so.1: httpd: fatal: /data/httpserv/apache-2.2.10/modules/mod_wl_22.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
We were using the mod_wl_22.so file provided for Solaris/Spark in the link mentioned below.
http://download.oracle.com/otn/bea/weblogic/server103/server103_apacheplugins.zip
Apache 2.2.10 installation that we are using is a 64-bit version. It seems mod_wl_22.so provided in the above link for solaris/spark is a 32-bit version. Is it possible to get a 64bit version of this library?
Anybody has worked on same/similar kind of issues? Is there any workaround, for this?
Input/thoughts from anyone is highly appreciated

Hello, I'm not an expert at confugring Apache and WebLogic servers. Hopefully someone else who does know what they are doing will reply to your question.
I found your question because I am also working on an Apache / WebLogic install for an Ariba installation (in Windows 7).
However I did support a configuration of WebLogic on Solaris with Apache. I remember that the guy who did the Apache install mentioned that Apache needed to be compiled correctly - below is what he sent:
Apache server compilation options:
./configure prefix=/usr/local/apache_2.0.63 enable-mods-shared=all enable-ssl=shared enable-ssl with-ssl=/usr/local/ssl enable-proxy enable-proxy-connect enable-proxy-http --with-mpm=worker
I am still looking into the differences between the plugins (mod 22 so vs mod 20 so). Navigating the Oracle download options can be bewildering. I found the link to download a full zip file of plugins (below).
Oracle WebLogic Server Web Server Plugins 1.1
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/ias/downloads/wls-plugins-096117.html
I clicked on "all versions."
Does the WLSPlugin1.1-64bitApache2.2-solaris-sparc.zip contain what you need?
Great luck to you!
-Tom Tobey

Work Manager Configuration Issue with SharePoint 2013

Hi,
We are facing issue to configure the Workflow Manager with SharePoint 2013.
===========================================================
Please provide any solution/inputs to resolve this issue.
Thanks.

Hi ,
According to your description, my understanding is that you got an error when you configured Workflow Manager for SharePoint 2013.
For resolving your issue, please do as the followings:
1.Start -> Programs -> Workflow Manager 1.0 -> Workflow Manager Configuration -> Remove from Farm (not to be confused with SharePoint “farm”)
2.Drop SQL databases for Workflow Manager. (SbGatewayDatabase, SbManagementDB, SBMessageContainer01, WFInstanceManagementDB, WFManagementDB, WFResourceManagementDB)
3.Start-> Programs-> Workflow Manager 1.0 -> Workflow Manager Configuration -> Configure Workflow Manager with Default Settings (Recommended)
4.Ran the wizard just like before and it should be completed successfully this time.
More information, please refer to the link below:
http://www.spjeff.com/tag/workflow-manager-1-0/
I hope this helps.
Thanks,
Wendy
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

System update configuration issue with local repository related to machine type

Hi,
Sorry if the issue has been posted earlier, i tried searching but cudnt find relevant post. Here is my issue:
My machine is Thinkpad R52. Type as printed on label is: 1858-CLG
While adding machine type in update retriever, I added machine type as 1858 (as it doesnt accept 1858CLG). After connecting to the support site, it downloaded all required updates onto a local(shared) repository.
I installed system update, configured it to pickup update from local (network) repository in the registry.
Now when I launch system update, it determines my machine type as 1858CLG & it connects to local repository only to display message as "No updates were found for this machine type"
Though I cud see updates if I directly connect to help center.
I think the problem is with machine type identification, not sure though.
Please advice on what I'm doing wrong. Is it with update retriever configuration or system update configuration.
Thanks much,

Solution for me was to change status of packages from "Test" to "Active" using Update Retriever.
Since this is not documented in Best Practices (but is stated in chapter 5 - modify settings) I spent several hours figuring it out..
-brian

IP Configuration issue with Airport Extreme

When configuring my Airport Extreme to use the AT&T DSL internet connection, an IP Configuration conflict is reported. My IP address is shown as in use by the Ethernet ID - DHCP Server. As a consequence, the Airport is not reporting an IP address to allow an internet connection. Here is the actual message:
192.168.1.64 in use by d8:a2:5e:7a:6e:35, DHCP Server 192.168.1.254
Hard re-starting the AIrport Extreme does not shake this configuration error.
I am now connecting successfully to the internet with an ethernet connection to the AT&T modem.
Thanks.

Check out this thread for some interesting items. The same instructions work for several users...but not another.
Re: AirPort Extreme Set Up Issue
AT&T wants this modem and router to work using DHCP - Bridge mode.
Not sure what you mean here.
This modem will not work correctly with an AirPort Extreme unless you put the modem in Bridge Mode or PPP is on the Router and then configure the AirPort Extreme to provide the PPPoE service.
I pulled out my old 2210 to test and confirm. Everything works just fine the way that AT&T recommends.
I think you will have nothing but headaches if you try to configure the modem for PPP is on the modem. Even if you can get the DHCP issues ironed out, a Double NAT error remains.

Configuration issue with ISMBP_CREATE IDOC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for