Configure 2 independent RAID on D10

Is It possible to configure RAID 1 with 2HD of 250GB and RAID 5 with 3HD of 500GB on D10 and if yes which should be set as a primary.
The configurator on the web says that it's not possible but according to the RAID spec RAID 1 requires 2 HDD's and RAID 5 requires min of 3 HDD's.
Is it possible that there is a mistake on the web configurator or all of the HDD's should have the same capacity ?
If we create 2 independent RAID all HDD'd need to have the same capacity ?

when you configure D10 on lenovo.com it says that the primary array should use the smaller drive size (ie; 2x 250GB in RAID 1) and the secondary array has to use equal or larger size drives (ie; 3x 750GB in RAID 5).   in addition, it was reported in this post that you can also run two separate RAID configurations using both SAS and SATA drives.
hope that helps.
ThinkStation C20
ThinkPad X1C · X220 · X60T · s30 · 600

Similar Messages

  • How to configure sngle-disk RAID?

    970a-G46, bios 1.11, and would like to know if anyone else is having trouble configuring a single boot disk for RAID.  Along with my twin 500GB RAID 0 & two 320GB RAID 0 drives for applications and data I thought I was OK.  My last MSI mobo included an on board Promise RAID controller in addition to the board's standard IDE controller, so C:\was IDE and the rest of my partitions were RAID 0 for, as I mentioned, my applications and data.  I lost a RAID 0 drive on the old motherboard but I was able to configure the single remaining RAID drive as a JBOD *single* drive under the RAID array (certainly not RAID 0...)--and the drive ran fine as "JBOD RAID."  It was there and attached to the RAID bus and configured as a RAID drive but instead was merely labeled a stand-alone JBOD RAID--functioning exactly like a standard single IDE drive.
    It doesn't appear as if the G46 drive controller supports JBOD RAID as a single drive, so I'm guessing that if I want to ,say, use a normal IDE single drive to boot and access the rest of my data from RAID 0 drives, or if I want to boot with a single JBOD RAID disk to access my normal RAID 0 drives--that I can't do any of that with the 970a-G46 without purchasing a separate internal PCI/e RAID 0 controller. 
    I had hoped that with the G46 I could use one drive to boot (either IDE or JBOD RAID) while all my other drives would be configured to RAID 0.  Consensus is that I just need to pick up a separate disk controller, either IDE or RAID (if it supports single-disk RAID--might as well have IDE in that case, right?), to use along side the current G46 Integrated IDE/AHCI/RAID controller.  Right?...  (Just want to make sure!)  Suggestion?
    From a dead, cold-boot state after having been turned off all night (not hybrid sleep, not sleep & not hibernation--off as in off), my current fairly slow IDE boot partition boots to a Win8x64  desktop in ~10-12 seconds...!  Takes 2-3 secs for a sleeping Win8 to wake up.  Don't need a RAID 0 boot drive for sheer boot speed anymore--and sure don't need the extra hassles of maintaining a Windows Boot partition in RAID format!
     

    I'm trying to do this same thing. I currently have 3 drivers setup in RAID 5 and just left my boot drive alone, didn't assign it to a RAID array or anything in the RAID controller setup. I see the drives as you would expect after loading the RAID driver during Windows install but get an 0x80300001 error saying that I can't install the OS to this location. Any ideas on what I'm doing wrong here.

  • Configure SATA as Raid

    Why have i not this option in my Bios
    Configure SATA as Raid
    How do i get it?

    RAID is to use two HDD in one of two configurations.  One, it uses both drives, formatted as one, to make ONE big drive, twice as fast.  Two, it uses one drive to mirror the other one, for a mirrored backup of the first.  The first instance is called RAID0 the other is RAID1.  

  • Workflows 2013 and SQL Report Services: Configure on Independent Servers or Existing App Servers?

    Currently, my SharePoint 2013 Farm has Workflows 2013 and SQL Report Services installed on app servers, along with other applications. Workflows 2013 isn't working correctly (installed prior to my coming on board with the organization), I'm assuming it
    is a configuration issue, but rather than re-configure, I've read that is recommended to be a standalone server. It was also recommended by a MSFT rep that our report services have its own independent server. Currently, Report Services is also installed on
    an app server that runs other applications on the farm.
    Has anyone had any experience with installing Workflows 2013 and/or SQL Report Services on independent vs. existing application servers?
    Additionally, my existing application servers have 24 GB of RAM (I believe the recommendation for SharePoint production environments is 12 GB), should I plan for the potentially new servers (Workflows and Report Services) to also have 24 GB of RAM? Not really
    sure if it will be needed if they have dedicated tasks.
    Thanks for any input you can provide!

    It entirely depends on load. WFM will work just fine installed on servers in the SharePoint farm. SSRS preferably should go on the end-user facing servers for better performance.
    The questions you're asking are all "it depends" :)
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    &nbsp&nbsp
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • Can the 2 internal hard drives in the dv8t be configured as a raid 0 array?

    I know the intel chipset supports (PM55) supports raid 0 but does the HP dv8t bios allow a raid configuration for the internal drives?

    HM, here is the 'Service and Maintenance Guide' for your computer:
     http://h10032.www1.hp.com/ctg/Manual/c01910942.pdf
    In the section titled 'Product description', it tells about the two hard drives, but mentions nothing about RAID.  Therefore, I believe that it is not supported.
    Message Edited by old_geekster on 11-03-2009 08:36 PM
    Signature:
    HP TouchPad - 1.2 GHz; 1 GB memory; 32 GB storage; WebOS/CyanogenMod 11(Kit Kat)
    HP 10 Plus; Android-Kit Kat; 1.0 GHz Allwinner A31 ARM Cortex A7 Quad Core Processor ; 2GB RAM Memory Long: 2 GB DDR3L SDRAM (1600MHz); 16GB disable eMMC 16GB v4.51
    HP Omen; i7-4710QH; 8 GB memory; 256 GB San Disk SSD; Win 8.1
    HP Photosmart 7520 AIO
    ++++++++++++++++++
    **Click the Thumbs Up+ to say 'Thanks' and the 'Accept as Solution' if I have solved your problem.**
    Intelligence is God given; Wisdom is the sum of our mistakes!
    I am not an HP employee.

  • UCSM 2.1 Local disk configuration policy and raid volumes

    Hi!
    If i use Any configuration as local disk configuration policy and do the raid settings directly to the RAID-cards, am i able to have two raid volumes on C-series under UCSM management?
    What i would like to do with C240M3 with 6 local disks: 2 disk raid1 and 4 disk raid0
    So i would use:
    "Any Configuration—For a server configuration that carries forward the local disk configuration without any changes."
    As UCS servers Raid guide indicates:
    "Maximum of One RAID Volume and One RAID Controller in Integrated Rack-Mount Servers
    A rack-mount server that has been integrated with Cisco UCS Manager can  have a maximum of one RAID volume irrespective of how many hard drives  are present on the server. "
    Is this paragraph limitation of GUI not able to set several volumes or hard fact without "Any configuration" workaround?

    I did some testing about this issue:
    Changed Local Disk Configuration to "Any Configuration"
    Two virtual disks can be created from Raid card's WebBIOS
    These disks are visible to RedHat Installation.
    UCSM shows Any configuration for the Storage Local Disk policy
    Actual Disk Configuration has faulty information - WebBios is the only place to check the RAID status?
    Next step: I'll do the same for the production

  • The disk configuration is not insync with the in-memory configuration. Software RAID 1 reactivation

    In trying to reactivate disk 3 of a raid mirror failed redundancy I get the error - The disk configurationis not insyncwith the in-memory configuration. The drive is accessible but I have no idea which of drive 2 and 3 are in use, drive 2 has unspecified
    errors but there is the option to reactivate disk 3.
    Does anyone have any idea what this means?
    I am running on a HP Proliant ML350 G5 with Windows Server 2012
    Thanks

    Hi,
    Since the Disk 2's status is Errors, we could not reactivate disk 3. Please try to reactivate disk 2 to check the results.
    If the disk does not return to the Online status and the volume does not return to the Healthy status, there may be something wrong with the disk. You should replace the failed mirror disk region.
    For more detailed information, please refer to the article below:
    Volume status descriptions
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc739417(v=ws.10).aspx#BKMK_2
    Best Regards,
    Mandy 
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here .
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Is that silly to configure a thunderbolt RAID ext HDD with partitions

    I have bought a WD my passport pro 4TB thunderbolt ext HDD. My original idea is to use the two HDDs of the my passport pro (in JBOD ) embodied through  thunderbolt and expecting twice the transfer rate from that of usb 3.0 hdd, and 2TB one for storage and  another 2TB as time machine.
    Disappointingly, it only provide a barely surpass USB 3.0 performance.
    Hence, I am considering  the following, so as to utilize the Raid 0 setup in order to get a better speed performance.
    1) Part the two HDDs into A1A2 and B1B2 (each partition 1TB)
    2) Map A1B1 into a raid 0 setup, while A2 left idle and B2 as time machine for the my macbook pro and (A1b1 raid 0 set-up)
    3) The speedtest result of A1B1 raid 0 and the indviudal A2, and b2 is apparently ok.
    My questions are:
    1. Would the setting in this way become unstable? and create silly bugs?
    2. I read that Raid 0 demand a whole piece of disk to be used? why I could setup in this way through disk utilities?

    BLF call presence is not yet working and I haven't identified the buddy watch or the lines in the config file that address this
    You have feature.1.name="presence" feature.1.enabled="1" included in your <PHONE_CONFIG></PHONE_CONFIG> It is "generic enable" for so called "buddy watch" feature. But then, you need to configure who's your buddy.
    It is part of phone's directory, e.g. [MAC address]-directory.xml file, but you have no such file. I assume your directory (so buddy list as well) is empty. The file in question looks like
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
    <directory>
    <item_list>
    <item>
    <ct>110</ct>
    <lb>Toby Flenderson</lb>
    <bw>1</bw>
    <sd>1</sd>
    </item>
    <item>
    <ct>106</ct>
    <lb>Edna Abbot</lb>
    <bw>1</bw>
    <sd>2</sd>
    </item>
    </directory>
    The bw is acronym for "buddy watch". Phone directory records with bw=1 are your buddies. It's status is monitored by Polycom phone then.

  • Looking to expand hard drive configuration into multiple Raid Drives...how

    I'm want to put either two or three new drives into my new mac pro. I'll be using them for video editing
    .....how hard is it (or wise) to link them in a SCSI configuration? How would I go about doing this?
    ....I'm not anywhere near a "gear guy" but I'm not stupid either (at least that's what my mom told me......heh)
    I was told that an "enterprise class" is the way to go on the type of hard drive, so I'm planning on getting that type of drive.
    Thanks for any help in advance.

    No one almost uses SCSI - and I was a die-hard. Even SAS isn't worth the trouble generally.
    A fast boot drive is helpful and SSDs or 10K WD SATA VelociRaptor (150-300-600GB capacity). Most just go for 1-2TB drives.
    Software RAID using Apple Disk Utility. Backups, 2-3 sets.
    With no real experience with RAID or setting things up then you are left with experimenting and testing what you know and can do and keeping it simple at first.
    And most people do use 4 drive bays and then externals for backup and more.
    SCSI generally means ATTO or LSI or others with a large up front cost in controller, cables and disk drives, that part hasn't changed much in 10 yrs. but SATA II/III has more options today.

  • Hard drive configuration with Promise Raid controller

    I plan on running two 30 gig 75GXP drives on the Promise controller in Raid-0 mode.  I also have a 60 gig WD drive that I use for backups and for initial installation.  During installation, I put the Win98SE setup files and all the drivers, apps, backup data, etc. on the WD drive and do a clean install from there.  
    My current (old) board is an Abit KT7-R with the Highpoint raid controller.  Using the Highpoint controller, I am able to put the WD drive as a slave device and the controller treats it as a normal IDE drive.  I'm moving to the 845 Ultra ARU.  From what I've read, if you put a single drive on the Promise controller, it tries to set it up as a Raid drive?  I don't want to risk losing my backup data on the WD drive to some attempt by the Promise controller to "raid" my single drive.  So, where is the best place to put my WD drive so that I can install my system from it?  I'm thinking about putting it as Master on IDE2.  I normally run my CD as Master on IDE1.  Once the installation is complete, I will remove the installation files from the WD drive and use it exclusively for backups.  I have the WD drive in a Vantec EZ-Swap rack, and I normally keep it powered off unless doing a backup.
    So, the plan is to create the Raid-0 array, Fdisk and format the array, and then load Windows from the WD drive, followed by all my applications.  Is Master on IDE-2 the best solution for the WD drive?  

    hi
    not very clued up on raid but it sounds right
    if the wd drive is on its own on that ide do not jumper
    as master you have to have no jumpers if all alone

  • Problems moving from 2 independent drives to RAID1 configuration

    Hi: My NAS200 has been running successfully configured as two independent drives: Public Disk 1/ and Public Disk 2/. I will refer to these as PD1 and PD2. I mostly use PD1 and have been using PD2 to make occasional backups of PD1 (I didn't like the idea of running in mirrored Raid1 mode based on a prior experience). Today I was trying to clone the contents of PD1 and decided to try turning on the RAID1 function, thinking it would make an exact duplicate of PD1 on PD2. My plan was to then break up the RAID mirror again and end up with two identical copies of PD1. However, after the RAID mirroring finished (took about 6 hours), I can no longer see PD1 or PD2 on the mirrored disks, nor Public Disk (PD) for that matter. Can anyone tell me what has happened and how I might recover from it? I have access to a SATA-USB converter and can use it to mount each individual disk onto either a linux or Windows system (via ext2ifs software). When I do this (on Windows), I see that there are three partitions on the disk, and I can name them with ext2ifs, but I can't see any of the contents. I'm currently running DiskInternals Linux Recovery 2.7 on Windows and it is scanning the disk for lost files. It seems to be finding data, but is running very slowly (20 minutes for 3%). Any leads appreciated. Thanks in advance! Maurice Lampell
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    The file system is XFS if you have the NAS200 configured for journaled file system, or ext2 if you are using unjournaled file system. ext2ifs can read (and write?) ext2 under Windows but XFS is not supported by any Windows software that I'm aware of.
    The RAID configuration is independent from the journaled vs non-journaled configuration: you can have journaled non-raid, journaled raid, non-journaled non-raid and non-journaled raid. RAID configurations are implemented using mdadm.
    You can download a SystemRescueCD image from the link in my signature to access the files on the disks from a PC. You burn that image to a CD and boot from it. SystemRescueCD understands SATA disks connected via a USB-SATA dongle, you just need to be able to boot from a CD-ROM drive which is something that all PCs less than about 10 years old can do. SystemRescueCD supports all the necessary file systems and I believe it automatically tries to mount any RAID-formatted disks. The partitions on the hard disk are (1) your data, (2) configuration files and (3) swap. So if you want to recover files, you can ignore the second and third partitions.
    I don't think the NAS can convert the configuration from separate disks to RAID without reformatting, so the files that were there in separate-disk mode are propbably lost. You may need another tool to recover the files.
    I don't know why your Public Disk shares don't show up, unless you made a change to the configuration so that the shares are hidden from your user name. If you have the web GUI configured to hide the share from guest logins, then maybe you're logged in as guest because you have "change failed logins to guest logins" enabled; you should disable this option.
    Your plan of mirroring the disks and then breaking the mirror to put one of the drives away as backup is not a good one, IMHO (and by the way, you really shouldn't remove the drive while the NAS is running). When the NAS loses a drive from the RAID, it will try to rebuild the RAID as soon as you restart with a second drive installed, and it will give the existing drive priority over the older one, so instead of restoring a backup after you lose your files, it will overwrite the backup with the other drive's data so you lose the lost files from the backup too. Also, rebuilding a mirror takes extremely long on the NAS200. It's better to use Separate Disks and run a scheduled backup from one disk to the other; if you delete a file by accident you only have to retrieve that one lost file which takes seconds instead of hours.
    ===Jac
    Frequent NAS200 Answers:
    1. DISABLE the "convert failed logins to guest logins" option to fix permission problems.
    2. NEVER insert or remove hard disks while the power is on. NAS200 doesn't support hot swapping.
    3. ALWAYS use the power button to turn the NAS200 off, don't just unplug it.
    4. Don't trust RAID. Make BACKUPS!
    5. To ACCESS the disks directly, you will need ext2 and/or XFS file systems. I recommend using SystemRescueCD.
    6. Disks will get HOT with standard fan, use "green" disks or consider replacing the fan.
    7. FTP server is insecure and doesn't work behind a NAT router. Use my firmware and SCP instead.
    8. MY FIRMWARE supports SSH shell prompt and SCP for secure file access, and allows running other software.

  • Raid 5 Configuration with Two Dead Drive Modules

    I have a xRaid (14-250 drives) configured as a Raid 5 (raid 50). Two drives have failed, one on each side of the xRaid.
    The Bad drives were pulled and new modules were installed. The new drives show green light, but when I retrieved data, the information is currupted. The New modules were removed and data was retrieved from the xRaid (missing the two drives) and the data appears to be okay. We are attepting to physically back-up all data on external drives.
    What should we do to ensure best data preservation and how do we replace the dead drives. Thank You
    xraid Mac OS X (10.3.9)

    Thank you for your response.
    The ADM are purchased as replacements. The xRaid is not iunder warranty (1.5 years old). They are the same 250 Gig configuration.
    We have not tried to re-intall the new ADM's as we were concerned about the data, since they did not appear to be re-bulding them selves and we just 'sitting there'. So we thought that it would be a reasonable idea to performa a data back-up onto external drives...yes all 2+ terabytes. The back-up worked fine for about the first 1.5 Terabytes, but then the server would hang during the file copy process and lock-up the entire system. In looking further it has been determined that the system locks up at the same files (some 65Mb tifs) so I presume that the data is currupt.
    The curruption of the data confuses me a little. We do have one dead ADM per controller side (one on the left and one on the right side) but it was my understanding that each controller could in theory loose one ADM without loosing data....
    Also, the xRaid does Not have the Latest Firmware. Should we update the firmware while trying to get this system back into a healthy condition or should we wait until we get all ADM's back up an going prior to firmware upgrading?
    Thank You

  • A Quick Question: RAID Configuration

    Hi Guys
    Following on from Greg's thread on an optimum system, I'm having my PC upgraded this afternoon by a visiting engineer (current specs below). RAM is being increased to 12gb and my cheap ATI Radeon video card is being replaced by a Nvidia FX3800.
    My question is; I'm having a 3rd HDD installed as well and then have the 3 discs configured in a RAID format. I know there are a couple of versions ('0', etc) and I wonder what people's views are on the most reliable type of RAID?
    Any advice would be welcome here.
    Regards,
    Graham
    This is the system currently:
    OS Name        Windows 7
    System Manufacturer  Gigabyte Technology
    System Model EX58-UD4P
    System Type   x64-based PC
    Intel i7
    Processor         EM64T Family 6 Model 26 Stepping 4 GenuineIntel ~2665 Mhz
    Processor         EM64T Family 6 Model 26 Stepping 4 GenuineIntel ~2665 Mhz
    Processor         EM64T Family 6 Model 26 Stepping 4 GenuineIntel ~2665 Mhz
    Processor         EM64T Family 6 Model 26 Stepping 4 GenuineIntel ~2665 Mhz
    Processor         EM64T Family 6 Model 26 Stepping 4 GenuineIntel ~2665 Mhz
    Processor         EM64T Family 6 Model 26 Stepping 4 GenuineIntel ~2665 Mhz
    Processor         EM64T Family 6 Model 26 Stepping 4 GenuineIntel ~2665 Mhz
    Processor         EM64T Family 6 Model 26 Stepping 4 GenuineIntel ~2665 Mhz
    BIOS Version/Date    Award Software International, Inc. F8, 11/05/2009
    SMBIOS Version       2.4
    HDDs             Samsung HD 103UJ x 2
    Hardware Abstraction Layer  Version = "5.2.3790.3959 (srv03_sp2_rtm.070216-1710)"
    Total Physical Memory           6,142.01 MB
    Available Physical Memory    5.06 GB
    Total Virtual Memory 7.61 GB
    Available Virtual Memory      6.84 GB

    Now Harm, you've really piqued my curioisty with this last reply. I just today received two WD Caviar Black 640GB hard drives to set up in a simple RAID 0 arrangement running off the motherboard. Already have 'em in the computer case. I've been working on my computer for three weeks, upgrading as I could, and planned to finally get up-n-running with CS5 tomorrow.
    I figured all was about to be rosy here with my Canon T2i and its AVCHD clips, because I was planning on using NeoScene to convert my highly compressed footage to something more processor friendly. It didn't occur to me that NeoScene might transcode to a format that overwhelms a two-disk RAID 0. Improve one problem and create another?
    Seemingly, native AVCHD clips only require about 5 MB/sec from a hard drive, so getting multiple layers coming off the drive(s) isn't an issue with AVCHD. The problem is that the CPU I have - AMD Phenom II 955 -  can't decode them fast enough. Clearly, it would be better to migrate to an i7 platform, but I don't have the money or time to do it this summer. In the meantime, I'm kicking around with one of my AMD computers I built for less taxing school usage this past spring. As of today, I have a simple RAID planned that should bump my disk transfer rates up past 160MB/sec. It's my first RAID setup so I'm pretty excited.
    Should I be planning for rain on this picnic?
    With a RAID 0 and transcoded NeoScene footage, I figured I would have a drive system able to deliver to the CPU fast enough and clips that not only are more digestible, but have the improved color space of 4:2:2 that comes from the NeoScene transcode. I was hoping to get at least four or five layers going with the GTX 480 card I got on sale last month (another piece for the i7 if needed). I plan on doing a LOT of chroma keying, and from what I read, the NeoScene transcode will improve our work in Ultra. Don't really know, but this is what I glean from other posts and the Cineform website.
    From another of your posts, I take it my CPU won't get close to saturating this fast video card. But the price was right and I have my eye to the future.
    I have a four disk setup planned:
    * 1TB Caviar Green for OS/Programs (already had this as my main disk, and drive charts show it hanging tough in middle of the pack)
    * 750GB Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000 for scratch disk (also had this one lying around, but was a top performer 18 months ago)
    * A pair of  640GB (32MB cache, twin processor) Caviar Blacks as mentioned for RAID 0. Drive charts still show this two year old design working in top quarter of range.
    OK Harm, here are my two questions:
    1) I can leave my AVCHD clips as-is and watch my processor choke on them, I suppose. Even the GTX 480 can't fix this, nor will sending these clips faster yet to the CPU.
    Or, I can transcode to something my weak CPU can work with. Time lost transcoding and a pain, but still part of the learning process and perhaps a good stop-gap measure until I can afford a better platform.
    2) NeoScene was my choice from the smattering of things I have found that describe workarounds on the AVCHD compression problem. This could have been $130 towards a better computer, but the aspect of get 4:2:2 color sounds good to my inexperienced ear. Maybe a good idea on its own and a decent fix to the AVCHD choking problem.
    Do you have an opinion on this plan/equipment setup?
    Do you know of a better transcode from AVCHD that makes for mid-sized files that are easier on a CPU but still manageable by a basic RAID 0 arrangement?

  • Best RAID configuration for combining external thunderbolt enclosures?

    I'm looking at configuring two external Western Digital Thunderbolt Duo drive enclosures using Disk Utility's software RAID setup tool. Each enclosure houses two 2TB drives. I'm looking to get the performance of RAID 0 striping with the redundancy of RAID 1 mirroring. What I'm not sure of, and I hope someone can shed some light on, is how to combine the RAID sets to achieve my desired goal. As I see it, there are two possible ways to go about this.
    The first would be to configure the master RAID set as mirrored, with the individual thunderbolt enclosures configured as striped sets. Example:
    The second approach would be to configure the master RAID set as striped, with the individual thunderbolt enclosures configured as mirrored set. Example:
    Can anyone tell me which is the better way to go about this? Are there advantages/disadvantages to either approach? Thanks for any insight you might have!

    Start here:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID
    see the heading Nested (hybrid) RAID
    The issue with striped RAID is that loss of one drive is devastating. Lose one drive and you lose it ALL.
    They advocate you make a striped set of Mirrored drives. One failure and you're fine, as long as you don't have another failure before you fix it.
    NB> RAID is not Backup -- you still need a backup.

  • Trying to configure onboard Raid

    I am trying to configure the onboard Raid.  I have (2) 80GB serial ATA drives and a DVD drive set to master on IDE1.  Only (1) of the 80gb drives show up in the bios, and my DVD drive does not read.  I know that the DVD drive works because it shows up under different configurations in the Bios.  Can anyone help with the right configuration?
    Thanks in advance!

    here.Check

Maybe you are looking for