Configuring Delayed Failover / Loadbalancing -EP6 SP10

Hi All,
We are installing EP6 SP10 (Single server set up) and plan to add a few more servers to facilitate Loadbalancing & Failover at a later stage. My Question is whether SAP Netweaver allows this procedure and if yes, would the installation steps for EP (initial installation) be the same, or would it different installation process to be followed?
Thanks,
-Mayur

Hi Rizwan,
This is definitely supported by SAP. You may just need to go to a higher SP stack. Check out the High Availability page on Service marketplace.
http://service.sap.com/ha
There are links to the documentation, presentations, how tos, etc. As far as changing you installation steps, the answer is no. The initial installation installs your web AS with the SCS instance, the DB and then you put the portal on after that. If you go back into the SAPinst installer you will find the option to add the server instances.
Hope this helps.
John

Similar Messages

SSL and EP6 SP10 Issue

We are running EP6 SP10 and trying to use SSL keys for secure access. We are using Hardware SSL key and it is configured on a seperate machine. When we use the
https:// url for the portal it shows the log in screen and after loggin on it refreshes and displays the same screen in http:// format. Is there any SSL key activation that needs to be done in the J2EE Server?
Also if we force the URL to https://portal, it works fine. Its just the login screen that throws us back in a http spin.
Please advise
Thanks,

Hi,
just trying to be of help - here's a link to the documentation for configuring SSL on the J2EE Engine: <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/f1/2de3be0382df45a398d3f9fb86a36a/frameset.htm">Configuring the Use of SSL on the SAP J2EE Engine</a>.
Regards,
Ivo

Upgrading EP6 SP10(j2ee,portal,KMC) to SP11

Hi,
I am trying to upgrade my EP6 SP10(with KMC) to SP11.
I downloaded all the patch files for J2EE, Portal &
KMC. I unzipped all the sar files in to a common folder
(sp_directory) using sapcar tool, exactly the way it is
listed in the documentation. As a result, there are
two main folders created in the root folder, one for
j2ee and the other for Portal & KMC. The document says,
I need to patch all the 3 components using the same SAPInst file. But, whenever I run the SAPInst exe file,
it is taking me through the same steps that is upgrading J2EE alone. After running SAPInst twice, I checked the versions of these 3 components in the portal and found that only J2EE is upgraded. Neither Portal platform nor the KMC has upgraded. Is there anything else that I need to do ?
regards
Sudheer

Sudheer,
You have to upgrade each component separately. Don't unsar everything together. This is what you do.
1. Unsar all the files required for J2ee upgrade.
3. run the sapinst to upgrade.
4. Delete all the folder/files directory created by unsar
5. Unsar all the files required for EP.
6. run the sapinst to upgrade EP.
7. Delete all the folder/files created by unsar.
8. Unsar all the files required for KMC.
9. run the sapinst to upgrade KMC.
10. delete all the folder/files created by unsar

2 Switches - 2 Routers - 2 ISP , I need to configure auto failover

Hello,
I need a help please.
I have 2 switches connected to 2 Routers and then 2 different ISPs.
     SW -----> Router(1) -----> ISP (Main)
      ||
      ||
     SW -----> Router -----> ISP (secondary)
on R1 I did this:
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
description TO_Internet_Switch
ip address <ip>  <MASK>
standby 1 ip (*WHAT TO TYPE HERE ?* ).
standby 1 priority 105
standby 1 preempt delay minimum 20
standby 1 track 1 decrement 10
duplex auto
speed auto
media-type rj45
negotiation auto
And
interface GigabitEthernet0/3
description "To ISPInternet"
ip address <IP> <MASK>
ip flow ingress
ip flow egress
duplex auto
speed auto
media-type rj45
negotiation auto
While on the secondary:
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
description TO_Internet_Switch
ip address <IP> <MASK>
standby 1 ip (*WHAT TO TYPE HERE ?* ).
standby 1 preempt
standby 1 track 2 decrement 10
duplex auto
speed auto
media-type rj45
negotiation auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/3
description "To ISPInternet"
ip address <IP> <MASK>
ip flow ingress
duplex auto
speed auto
media-type rj45
negotiation auto
Firstly I need answers ? Am I correct into this ? Kindly need you assistance. Thanks :)

Hello Sub,
It's well understood. Now I have configured the BGP on both routers as of :
router bgp 200025
bgp log-neighbor-changes
network <ip> mask <MASK>
neighbor <ip> remote-as 35753
neighbor <ip> password 7 03454F08265D2E1D1A
neighbor <ip> soft-reconfiguration inbound
neighbor <ip> prefix-list defualt in
neighbor <ip> prefix-list ANNOUNCE out
neighbor <ip> route-map ISP2-in in
neighbor <ip> route-map ISP2-out out
neighbor <ip> remote-as 200025
neighbor <ip> update-source Loopback0
neighbor <ip> next-hop-self
Am I right on this ?
Now, what are the commands that will make the auto failover work? where should be these command written? on Main router ? or both of them? what is the command.
I appreciate your help all.

"Storage is not configured" during failover - COH-1467 still not fixed?

I am runing a test program using two cache nodes and one "client JVM", all on the same machine (the first cache node is used as WKA). When I kill one of the cache nodes and the restart it again I get the following exceptions:
In the surviving cache node:
2009-01-22 08:01:14.753/112.718 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <Error> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1): An exception (java.lang.ClassCastException) occurred reading Message AggregateFilterRequest Type=31 for Service=DistributedCache{Name=DistributedCache, State=(SERVICE_STARTED), LocalStorage=enabled, PartitionCount=257, BackupCount=1, AssignedPartitions=257, BackupPartitions=0}
2009-01-22 08:01:14.753/112.718 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <Error> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1): Terminating DistributedCache due to unhandled exception: java.lang.ClassCastException
2009-01-22 08:01:14.753/112.718 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <Error> (thread=DistributedCache, member=1):
java.lang.ClassCastException: java.lang.Long
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache$AggregateFilterRequest.read(DistributedCache.CDB:8)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Grid.onNotify(Grid.CDB:117)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache.onNotify(DistributedCache.CDB:3)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.Daemon.run(Daemon.CDB:37)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
On the restarted cache node:
2009-01-22 08:01:15.722/2.220 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <Info> (thread=Main Thread, member=n/a): Loaded cache configuration from resource "file:/C:/Javaproj/Query/lib/master-coherence-cache-config.xml"
2009-01-22 08:01:16.565/3.063 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=n/a): Service Cluster joined the cluster with senior service member n/a
2009-01-22 08:01:16.628/3.126 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <Info> (thread=Cluster, member=n/a): Failed to satisfy the variance: allowed=16, actual=31
2009-01-22 08:01:16.628/3.126 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <Info> (thread=Cluster, member=n/a): Increasing allowable variance to 17
2009-01-22 08:01:17.003/3.501 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <Info> (thread=Cluster, member=n/a): This Member(Id=5, Timestamp=2009-01-22 08:01:16.768, Address=138.106.109.121:54101, MachineId=36217, Location=site:global.scd.scania.com,machine:N27858,process:22728, Edition=Grid Edition, Mode=Development, CpuCount=2, SocketCount=1) joined cluster with senior Member(Id=1, Timestamp=2009-01-22 07:59:24.098, Address=138.106.109.121:54100, MachineId=36217, Location=site:global.scd.scania.com,machine:N27858,process:22948, Edition=Grid Edition, Mode=Development, CpuCount=2, SocketCount=1)
2009-01-22 08:01:17.065/3.563 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=n/a): Member(Id=4, Timestamp=2009-01-22 08:00:35.566, Address=138.106.109.121:8088, MachineId=36217, Location=site:global.scd.scania.com,machine:N27858,process:11544) joined Cluster with senior member 1
2009-01-22 08:01:17.081/3.579 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=n/a): Member 1 joined Service Management with senior member 1
2009-01-22 08:01:17.081/3.579 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=n/a): Member 1 joined Service InvocationService with senior member 1
2009-01-22 08:01:17.081/3.579 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=n/a): Member 1 joined Service DistributedCacheNoBackup with senior member 1
2009-01-22 08:01:17.097/3.595 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=n/a): Member 4 joined Service InvocationService with senior member 1
2009-01-22 08:01:17.097/3.595 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=n/a): Member 4 joined Service DistributedCache with senior member 4
2009-01-22 08:01:17.222/3.720 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=5): TcpRing: connecting to member 4 using TcpSocket{State=STATE_OPEN, Socket=Socket[addr=/138.106.109.121,port=8088,localport=3609]}
2009-01-22 08:01:17.253/3.751 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Invocation:Management, member=5): Service Management joined the cluster with senior service member 1
2009-01-22 08:01:17.393/3.891 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Invocation:InvocationService, member=5): Service InvocationService joined the cluster with senior service member 1
2009-01-22 08:01:18.643/5.141 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=5): Member 1 joined Service DistributedCache with senior member 4
2009-01-22 08:01:19.050/5.548 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=5): Member 1 left service DistributedCache with senior member 4
2009-01-22 08:01:23.659/10.157 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=5): Member 1 joined Service DistributedCache with senior member 4
2009-01-22 08:01:24.284/10.782 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=5): Member 1 left service DistributedCache with senior member 4
2009-01-22 08:01:28.674/15.172 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=5): Member 1 joined Service DistributedCache with senior member 4
2009-01-22 08:01:29.503/16.001 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=5): Member 1 left service DistributedCache with senior member 4
2009-01-22 08:01:33.674/20.172 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=5): Member 1 joined Service DistributedCache with senior member 4
2009-01-22 08:01:33.721/20.219 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=5): Member 1 left service DistributedCache with senior member 4
2009-01-22 08:01:38.674/25.172 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=5): Member 1 joined Service DistributedCache with senior member 4
2009-01-22 08:01:38.956/25.454 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=5): Member 1 left service DistributedCache with senior member 4
2009-01-22 08:01:43.690/30.188 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=5): Member 1 joined Service DistributedCache with senior member 4
2009-01-22 08:01:44.174/30.672 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Cluster, member=5): Member 1 left service DistributedCache with senior member 4
2009-01-22 08:01:47.659/34.157 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <Error> (thread=Main Thread, member=5): Error while starting service "InvocationService": com.tangosol.net.RequestTimeoutException: Timeout during service start: ServiceInfo(Id=2, Name=InvocationService, Type=Invocation
MemberSet=ServiceMemberSet(
OldestMember=Member(Id=1, Timestamp=2009-01-22 07:59:24.098, Address=138.106.109.121:54100, MachineId=36217, Location=site:global.scd.scania.com,machine:N27858,process:22948)
ActualMemberSet=MemberSet(Size=3, BitSetCount=2
Member(Id=1, Timestamp=2009-01-22 07:59:24.098, Address=138.106.109.121:54100, MachineId=36217, Location=site:global.scd.scania.com,machine:N27858,process:22948)
Member(Id=4, Timestamp=2009-01-22 08:00:35.566, Address=138.106.109.121:8088, MachineId=36217, Location=site:global.scd.scania.com,machine:N27858,process:11544)
Member(Id=5, Timestamp=2009-01-22 08:01:16.768, Address=138.106.109.121:54101, MachineId=36217, Location=site:global.scd.scania.com,machine:N27858,process:22728)
MemberId/ServiceVersion/ServiceJoined/ServiceLeaving
1/3.1/Thu Jan 22 07:59:27 CET 2009/false,
4/3.1/Thu Jan 22 08:00:36 CET 2009/false,
5/3.1/Thu Jan 22 08:01:17 CET 2009/false
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Grid.onStartupTimeout(Grid.CDB:6)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.Service.start(Service.CDB:27)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Grid.start(Grid.CDB:38)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.SafeService.startService(SafeService.CDB:28)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.SafeService.ensureRunningService(SafeService.CDB:27)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.SafeService.start(SafeService.CDB:14)
     at com.tangosol.net.DefaultConfigurableCacheFactory.ensureService(DefaultConfigurableCacheFactory.java:841)
     at com.tangosol.net.DefaultCacheServer.start(DefaultCacheServer.java:140)
     at com.tangosol.net.DefaultCacheServer.main(DefaultCacheServer.java:61)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at com.intellij.rt.execution.application.AppMain.main(AppMain.java:90)
Exception in thread "Main Thread" com.tangosol.net.RequestTimeoutException: Timeout during service start: ServiceInfo(Id=2, Name=InvocationService, Type=Invocation
MemberSet=ServiceMemberSet(
OldestMember=Member(Id=1, Timestamp=2009-01-22 07:59:24.098, Address=138.106.109.121:54100, MachineId=36217, Location=site:global.scd.scania.com,machine:N27858,process:22948)
ActualMemberSet=MemberSet(Size=3, BitSetCount=2
Member(Id=1, Timestamp=2009-01-22 07:59:24.098, Address=138.106.109.121:54100, MachineId=36217, Location=site:global.scd.scania.com,machine:N27858,process:22948)
Member(Id=4, Timestamp=2009-01-22 08:00:35.566, Address=138.106.109.121:8088, MachineId=36217, Location=site:global.scd.scania.com,machine:N27858,process:11544)
Member(Id=5, Timestamp=2009-01-22 08:01:16.768, Address=138.106.109.121:54101, MachineId=36217, Location=site:global.scd.scania.com,machine:N27858,process:22728)
MemberId/ServiceVersion/ServiceJoined/ServiceLeaving
1/3.1/Thu Jan 22 07:59:27 CET 2009/false,
4/3.1/Thu Jan 22 08:00:36 CET 2009/false,
5/3.1/Thu Jan 22 08:01:17 CET 2009/false
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Grid.onStartupTimeout(Grid.CDB:6)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.Service.start(Service.CDB:27)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Grid.start(Grid.CDB:38)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.SafeService.startService(SafeService.CDB:28)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.SafeService.ensureRunningService(SafeService.CDB:27)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.SafeService.start(SafeService.CDB:14)
     at com.tangosol.net.DefaultConfigurableCacheFactory.ensureService(DefaultConfigurableCacheFactory.java:841)
     at com.tangosol.net.DefaultCacheServer.start(DefaultCacheServer.java:140)
     at com.tangosol.net.DefaultCacheServer.main(DefaultCacheServer.java:61)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
     at com.intellij.rt.execution.application.AppMain.main(AppMain.java:90)
2009-01-22 08:01:47.659/34.157 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <Error> (thread=Invocation:InvocationService, member=5): validatePolls: This service timed-out due to unanswered handshake request. Manual intervention is required to stop the members that have not responded to this Poll
PollId=1, active
InitTimeMillis=1232607677393
Service=InvocationService (2)
RespondedMemberSet=[1]
LeftMemberSet=[]
RemainingMemberSet=[4]
2009-01-22 08:01:47.659/34.157 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Invocation:InvocationService, member=5): Service InvocationService left the cluster
2009-01-22 08:01:47.659/34.157 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D4> (thread=ShutdownHook, member=5): ShutdownHook: stopping cluster node
Process finished with exit code 1
On the client JVM:
2009-01-22 08:01:14.815/41.265 Oracle Coherence GE 3.4.1/407 <D5> (thread=Invocation:InvocationService, member=4): Repeating AggregateFilterRequest due to the re-distribution of PartitionSet[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127]
java.lang.RuntimeException: Storage is not configured
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache$BinaryMap.onMissingStorage(DistributedCache.CDB:9)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache$BinaryMap.ensureRequestTarget(DistributedCache.CDB:33)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache$BinaryMap.sendPartitionedRequest(DistributedCache.CDB:31)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache$BinaryMap.aggregate(DistributedCache.CDB:11)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache$ViewMap.aggregate(DistributedCache.CDB:52)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.SafeNamedCache.aggregate(SafeNamedCache.CDB:1)
     at com.tangosol.net.cache.NearCache.aggregate(NearCache.java:453)
     at com.scania.oas.coherence.invocables.ValueQueryInvocable.typeSearch(ValueQueryInvocable.java:260)
     at com.scania.oas.coherence.invocables.ValueQueryInvocable.queryStringFirstSearch(ValueQueryInvocable.java:300)
     at com.scania.oas.coherence.invocables.ValueQueryInvocable.run(ValueQueryInvocable.java:135)
     at com.scania.oas.coherence.invocables.InvocableWrapper.run(InvocableWrapper.java:54)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.InvocationService.onInvocationRequest(InvocationService.CDB:10)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.InvocationService$InvocationRequest.onReceived(InvocationService.CDB:40)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Grid.onMessage(Grid.CDB:9)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Grid.onNotify(Grid.CDB:130)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.Daemon.run(Daemon.CDB:37)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
java.lang.RuntimeException: Storage is not configured
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache$BinaryMap.onMissingStorage(DistributedCache.CDB:9)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache$BinaryMap.ensureRequestTarget(DistributedCache.CDB:33)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache$BinaryMap.sendPartitionedRequest(DistributedCache.CDB:31)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache$BinaryMap.aggregate(DistributedCache.CDB:11)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.DistributedCache$ViewMap.aggregate(DistributedCache.CDB:52)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.SafeNamedCache.aggregate(SafeNamedCache.CDB:1)
     at com.tangosol.net.cache.NearCache.aggregate(NearCache.java:453)
     at com.scania.oas.coherence.invocables.ValueQueryInvocable.queryStringSearch(ValueQueryInvocable.java:268)
     at com.scania.oas.coherence.invocables.ValueQueryInvocable.queryStringFirstSearch(ValueQueryInvocable.java:297)
     at com.scania.oas.coherence.invocables.ValueQueryInvocable.run(ValueQueryInvocable.java:135)
     at com.scania.oas.coherence.invocables.InvocableWrapper.run(InvocableWrapper.java:54)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.InvocationService.onInvocationRequest(InvocationService.CDB:10)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.grid.InvocationService$InvocationRequest.onReceived(InvocationService.CDB:40)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Grid.onMessage(Grid.CDB:9)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.daemon.queueProcessor.service.Grid.onNotify(Grid.CDB:130)
     at com.tangosol.coherence.component.util.Daemon.run(Daemon.CDB:37)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
I even tried to re-write the "run method" in tthe invocable in a way that caused it to, in a loop, perform a delay and then re-try its calculations when it received a runtime exception with the text "Storage is not configured" causing the retreival a new named cache each time but this did not help - it never seemed to recover...
Since I dont see any of my application classes in the "class cast" trace-back I assume it is an Coherence internal problem or can you thiink about some user programming error that could cause it? I am by the way not using any long or "Long in my application...
Best Regards
Magnus

Hi Magnus,
The log you provided seems to indicate that the problem was caused by the de-serialization of the “AggregateFilterRequest” message. The only explanation we have is that you are using a custom Filter that has asymmetrical serialization/deserialization routines, causing this failure. Could you please send us the corresponding client code?
Meanwhile, we will open a JIRA issue, to make sure that Coherence handles this kind of error more gracefully.
-David

How to configure Radius failover in ACS 5.1

Hi,
I need to configure the ACS 5.1 to meet the following requirement :-
1. ACS 5.1 will point to a RSA SecurID as the first authentication mechanism for the validation of user credential
2. In the event that RSA SecurID is not reachable, the ACS 5.1 shall point to its local user database.
I had no problem configuring for Point (1), but I am not able to let it failover to the local user database.
Can any expert out there advise on the configuration portion?
regards

This is the reply from the TAC engineer,
> I believe that you are hitting this bug:
>
http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method
> =fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCtl05416
> While the notes for this bug talk about problems with AD, the same
> problem applies to _any_ identity sequence that you create.
> For example, if you create an Identity Store Sequence with the Identity
> Stores A and B, the ACS will _not_ go to Identity B if Identity Store A
> is not available. It does not matter what the order of identity stores
> is in the sequence. This is a known issue with ACS 5.2 and there is no
> work around.
>
> This problem will be resolved in the next release of ACS, which will be
> ACS 5.3. The 5.3 release will allow you to select what action is to take
> place is an Identity Store becomes unavailable.
> "
So would like to seek your opinion. In addition, also found this article.
http://blog.pbmit.com/digipass2

Configuring JMS and loadbalancer with SSL termination? Has Anyone done it?

Hi all,
I'm having a problem getting JMS or even any JNDI lookup to work with a hardware load balancer and SSL termination. Has anyone used such a configuration? The load balancer in question is a Cisco CSS 11500 Series which has an SSL module. A client communicates with the CSS over SSL, the SSL module decrypts the packets and sends it for content switching and on to WebLogic as cleartext.
Without SSL termination everthing works fine. With SSL termination active, Web service and web content all work fine, but I can't get SSL tGetting Initial context from ms01
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:22 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSL/Domestic license found>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:22 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <Not in server, Certicom SSL license found>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:23 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSL Session TTL :90000>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:23 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <Trusted CA keystore: D:/eclipse/workspace/LoadBalancerTest/ssl/keystores/cssKeyS
ore.keystore>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <Filtering JSSE SSLSocket>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLIOContextTable.addContext(ctx): 886220>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLSocket will NOT be Muxing>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write SSL_20_RECORD>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3941240 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3941240 received HANDSHAKE>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <HANDSHAKEMESSAGE: ServerHello>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3941240 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3941240 received HANDSHAKE>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <HANDSHAKEMESSAGE: Certificate>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <validationCallback: validateErr = 0>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> < cert[0] = [
Version: V3
Subject: EMAILADDRESS="[email protected] ", CN=10.51.0.200, OU=Web Administration, O=Revenue Commissioners, L=Dublin, ST=Dublin,
=IE
Signature Algorithm: MD5withRSA, OID = 1.2.840.113549.1.1.4
Key: SunJSSE RSA public key:
public exponent:
010001
modulus:
a8f60248 b87c5860 229b9044 a666a9ae 27eb488c 424d9e67 e7b9d6d0 c292f081
cfa76c04 f3d89b28 1bf544f9 5de2b66d 576ebeca 5dc5ca8a fceead9a 52e2ce6c
2b91afef e4da5071 49b8784c 12d7f5f3 99f76482 79efe1d8 0a24f664 4c8d6e9e
b0bc63be 1faf8319 eeb23e8a 019b65b2 59dd086d 1b714d4c 01618804 66f416bb
Validity: [From: Fri Sep 08 11:44:28 BST 2006,
               To: Mon Sep 05 11:44:28 BST 2016]
Issuer: CN=Revenue CA, OU=Revenue Certificate Authority, O=Office Of The Revenue Commissioners, L=Dublin, ST=Dublin, C=IE
SerialNumber: [    0131]
Certificate Extensions: 4
[1]: ObjectId: 2.16.840.1.113730.1.13 Criticality=false
Extension unknown: DER encoded OCTET string =
0000: 04 1F 16 1D 4F 70 65 6E 53 53 4C 20 47 65 6E 65 ....OpenSSL Gene
0010: 72 61 74 65 64 20 43 65 72 74 69 66 69 63 61 74 rated Certificat
0020: 65 e
[2]: ObjectId: 2.5.29.14 Criticality=false
SubjectKeyIdentifier [
KeyIdentifier [
0000: 0E 6E 72 2E B1 3B B6 A3 59 79 5A C5 41 26 B7 B6 .nr..;..YyZ.A&..
0010: A2 39 4C 73 .9Ls
[3]: ObjectId: 2.5.29.35 Criticality=false
AuthorityKeyIdentifier [
KeyIdentifier [
0000: D2 66 DD FC 06 C2 BC 7E 18 D5 64 38 AD 6E D0 0A .f........d8.n..
0010: AA 97 05 0D ....
[CN=Revenue CA, OU=Revenue Certificate Authority, O=Office Of The Revenue Commissioners, L=Dublin, ST=Dublin, C=IE]
SerialNumber: [    00]
[4]: ObjectId: 2.5.29.19 Criticality=false
BasicConstraints:[
CA:false
PathLen: undefined
Algorithm: [MD5withRSA]
Signature:
0000: 2C A0 0C 34 4E 0D CA 24 A5 C3 03 3A 71 A1 2D D3 ,..4N..$...:q.-.
0010: 65 A2 FA EF C1 5D D4 4A 28 8C 1A 70 5F 92 73 5E e....].J(..p_.s^
0020: 7B 13 D4 AE 36 A8 86 EA 60 7F A5 E3 86 6E 84 1F ....6...`....n..
0030: 5E 5F 30 06 B4 AA 2E 5C A7 65 74 32 09 0A 91 14 ^_0....\.et2....
]>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> < cert[1] = [
Version: V3
Subject: CN=Revenue CA, OU=Revenue Certificate Authority, O=Office Of The Revenue Commissioners, L=Dublin, ST=Dublin, C=IE
Signature Algorithm: MD5withRSA, OID = 1.2.840.113549.1.1.4
Key: SunJSSE RSA public key:
public exponent:
010001
modulus:
bc61b29f a830c97a 7a76883e 1665a241 a68b891f 8e4167eb 62e578ac 9e342c3e
53c9de8b e756634b e364010f 4d36c1c5 21a65b37 b64b4861 6f4dda29 b932191f
Validity: [From: Mon May 31 15:22:15 BST 2004,
               To: Thu May 29 15:22:15 BST 2014]
Issuer: CN=Revenue CA, OU=Revenue Certificate Authority, O=Office Of The Revenue Commissioners, L=Dublin, ST=Dublin, C=IE
SerialNumber: [    00]
Certificate Extensions: 3
[1]: ObjectId: 2.5.29.14 Criticality=false
SubjectKeyIdentifier [
KeyIdentifier [
0000: D2 66 DD FC 06 C2 BC 7E 18 D5 64 38 AD 6E D0 0A .f........d8.n..
0010: AA 97 05 0D ....
[2]: ObjectId: 2.5.29.35 Criticality=false
AuthorityKeyIdentifier [
KeyIdentifier [
0000: D2 66 DD FC 06 C2 BC 7E 18 D5 64 38 AD 6E D0 0A .f........d8.n..
0010: AA 97 05 0D ....
[CN=Revenue CA, OU=Revenue Certificate Authority, O=Office Of The Revenue Commissioners, L=Dublin, ST=Dublin, C=IE]
SerialNumber: [    00]
[3]: ObjectId: 2.5.29.19 Criticality=true
BasicConstraints:[
CA:true
PathLen:2147483647
Algorithm: [MD5withRSA]
Signature:
0000: 3C 64 7C 9E 0B 90 48 9D 70 74 06 80 7F 2C AF 73 <d....H.pt...,.s
0010: 92 1C C3 39 DD C3 45 B6 A4 8E 11 27 8E 21 18 4B ...9..E....'.!.K
0020: FD AA 31 5E 35 FC DF 9E 70 42 F4 65 5C DF 56 9A ..1^5...pB.e\.V.
0030: DD 8C 6B B7 3B BE E5 A7 D5 4A 16 23 C1 91 07 CA ..k.;....J.#....
]>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLTrustValidator returns: 0>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <Trust status (0): NONE>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <Performing hostname validation checks: 10.51.0.200>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3941240 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3941240 received HANDSHAKE>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <HANDSHAKEMESSAGE: ServerHelloDone>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write HANDSHAKE, offset = 0, length = 134>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write CHANGE_CIPHER_SPEC, offset = 0, length = 1>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write HANDSHAKE, offset = 0, length = 16>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3941240 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3941240 received CHANGE_CIPHER_SPEC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3941240 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3941240 received HANDSHAKE>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <HANDSHAKEMESSAGE: Finished>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write APPLICATION_DATA, offset = 0, length = 0>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write APPLICATION_DATA, offset = 0, length = 272>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3445873 read(offset=0, length=2048)>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3941240 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3941240 received APPLICATION_DATA: databufferLen 0, contentLength 372>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3445873 read databufferLen 372>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3445873 read A returns 372>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write APPLICATION_DATA, offset = 0, length = 0>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write APPLICATION_DATA, offset = 0, length = 339>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3445873 read(offset=372, length=1676)>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <Filtering JSSE SSLSocket>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLIOContextTable.addContext(ctx): 6771926>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLSocket will NOT be Muxing>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write HANDSHAKE, offset = 0, length = 93>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3840954 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3840954 received HANDSHAKE>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <HANDSHAKEMESSAGE: ServerHello>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3840954 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3840954 received CHANGE_CIPHER_SPEC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3840954 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3840954 received HANDSHAKE>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <HANDSHAKEMESSAGE: Finished>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write CHANGE_CIPHER_SPEC, offset = 0, length = 1>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write HANDSHAKE, offset = 0, length = 16>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write APPLICATION_DATA, offset = 0, length = 0>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write APPLICATION_DATA, offset = 0, length = 402>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write APPLICATION_DATA, offset = 0, length = 0>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write APPLICATION_DATA, offset = 0, length = 1707>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <23328673 read(offset=0, length=2048)>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3840954 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3840954 received APPLICATION_DATA: databufferLen 0, contentLength 174>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <23328673 read databufferLen 174>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:29 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <23328673 read A returns 174>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:44 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <NEW ALERT with Severity: WARNING, Type: 0
java.lang.Exception: New alert stack
at com.certicom.tls.record.alert.Alert.<init>(Unknown Source)
at com.certicom.tls.interfaceimpl.TLSConnectionImpl.closeWriteHandler(Unknown Source)
at com.certicom.tls.interfaceimpl.TLSConnectionImpl.close(Unknown Source)
at javax.net.ssl.impl.SSLSocketImpl.close(Unknown Source)
at weblogic.net.http.HttpClient.closeServer(HttpClient.java:466)
at weblogic.net.http.KeepAliveCache$1.run(KeepAliveCache.java:120)
at java.util.TimerThread.mainLoop(Unknown Source)
at java.util.TimerThread.run(Unknown Source)
>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:44 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <avalable(): 23328673 : 0 + 0 = 0>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:44 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write ALERT, offset = 0, length = 2>
<29-Sep-2006 16:07:44 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLIOContextTable.removeContext(ctx): 6771926>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3941240 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3941240 received APPLICATION_DATA: databufferLen 0, contentLength 98>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3445873 read databufferLen 98>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <3445873 read A returns 98>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <Filtering JSSE SSLSocket>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLIOContextTable.addContext(ctx): 8406772>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLSocket will NOT be Muxing>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write HANDSHAKE, offset = 0, length = 93>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <21830977 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <21830977 received HANDSHAKE>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <HANDSHAKEMESSAGE: ServerHello>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <21830977 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <21830977 received CHANGE_CIPHER_SPEC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <21830977 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <21830977 received HANDSHAKE>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <HANDSHAKEMESSAGE: Finished>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write CHANGE_CIPHER_SPEC, offset = 0, length = 1>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write HANDSHAKE, offset = 0, length = 16>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write APPLICATION_DATA, offset = 0, length = 0>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write APPLICATION_DATA, offset = 0, length = 339>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <5618579 read(offset=0, length=2048)>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:08:13 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
Exception in thread "main" javax.naming.CommunicationException [Root exception is java.net.ConnectException: https://10.51.0.200:8143: Boot
trap to: 10.51.0.200/10.51.0.200:8143' over: 'https' got an error or timed out]
at weblogic.jndi.internal.ExceptionTranslator.toNamingException(ExceptionTranslator.java:47)
at weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.toNamingException(WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.java:636)
at weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.getInitialContext(WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.java:306)
at weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.getInitialContext(WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.java:239)
at weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactory.getInitialContext(WLInitialContextFactory.java:135)
at javax.naming.spi.NamingManager.getInitialContext(Unknown Source)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.getDefaultInitCtx(Unknown Source)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.init(Unknown Source)
at javax.naming.InitialContext.<init>(Unknown Source)
at TestAllManagedServers.main(TestAllManagedServers.java:54)
Caused by: java.net.ConnectException: https://10.51.0.200:8143: Bootstrap to: 10.51.0.200/10.51.0.200:8143' over: 'https' got an error or t
med out
at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMFinder.findOrCreate(RJVMFinder.java:200)
at weblogic.rjvm.ServerURL.findOrCreateRJVM(ServerURL.java:125)
at weblogic.jndi.WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.getInitialContext(WLInitialContextFactoryDelegate.java:296)
... 7 more
o work for a simple JNDI lookup. With SSL debugging turned on, the following output is given:
When I compare the Server HTTP logs I see that an initial context lookup involves 3 HTTP requests, e.g.
25.2.1.210 - - [29/Sep/2006:16:29:12 +0100] "GET /bea_wls_internal/HTTPClntLogin/a.tun?wl-login=https+dummy+WLREQS+8.1.5+dummy+%0A&r
and=3018901804201457976&AS=255&HL=19 HTTP/1.1" 200 17
25.2.1.210 - - [29/Sep/2006:16:29:12 +0100] "GET /bea_wls_internal/HTTPClntRecv/a.tun?connectionID=0&rand=7332722597180897050 HTTP/1
.1" 200 2341
25.2.1.210 - - [29/Sep/2006:16:29:12 +0100] "POST /bea_wls_internal/HTTPClntSend/a.tun?connectionID=0&rand=3415396992694182025 HTTP/
1.1" 200 17
When my request goes through the load balancer I see the following in the HTTP logs:
10.51.0.200 - - [29/Sep/2006:16:31:33 +0100] "GET /bea_wls_internal/HTTPClntLogin/a.tun?wl-login=https+dummy+WLREQS+8.1.5+dummy+%0A&
rand=8279752507152372405&AS=255&HL=19 HTTP/1.1" 200 17
10.51.0.200 - - [29/Sep/2006:16:31:33 +0100] "POST /bea_wls_internal/HTTPClntSend/a.tun?connectionID=0&rand=1051450669479197885 HTTP
/1.1" 200 17
10.51.0.200 - - [29/Sep/2006:16:32:28 +0100] "GET /bea_wls_internal/HTTPClntRecv/a.tun?connectionID=0&rand=6035654607615870287 HTTP/
1.1" 200 5
10.51.0.200 - - [29/Sep/2006:16:33:13 +0100] "GET /bea_wls_internal/HTTPClntRecv/a.tun?connectionID=0&rand=8245112057388607005 HTTP/
1.1" 200 5
Notice the time delay in some of the messages.
The following error appears in the WebLogic server log, however I've verified that all IP addresses referenced by the load balancer configuration match those in the WebLogic configuration:
<29-Sep-2006 16:31:43 o'clock IST> <Error> <RJVM> <BEA-000572> <The server rejected a connection attempt JVMMessage from: '266014296
868812899C:25.2.1.210R:2462711729186814398S:10.51.0.2:[8113,8113,8114,8114,8113,8114,-1,0,0]:10.51.0.1:8103,10.51.0.1:8105,10.51.0.1
:8107,10.51.0.2:8109,10.51.0.2:8111,10.51.0.2:8113:risIntCluster01:ms06' to: '0S:10.51.0.200:[-1,-1,-1,8143,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]' cmd: 'C
MD_IDENTIFY_REQUEST', QOS: '102', responseId: '0', invokableId: '0', flags: 'JVMIDs Sent, TX Context Not Sent', abbrev offset: '228'
probably due to an incorrect firewall configuration or admin command.>
When a JNDI lookup is made directly to a WebLogic server on the https port, the client gives the following output:
Getting Initial context from ms01
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:22 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSL/Domestic license found>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:22 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <Not in server, Certicom SSL license found>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:23 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSL Session TTL :90000>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:23 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <Trusted CA keystore: D:/eclipse/workspace/LoadBalancerTest/ssl/keystores/cssKeySt
ore.keystore>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:23 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <Filtering JSSE SSLSocket>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:23 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLIOContextTable.addContext(ctx): 7860099>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:23 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLSocket will NOT be Muxing>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write SSL_20_RECORD>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <32915800 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <32915800 received HANDSHAKE>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <HANDSHAKEMESSAGE: ServerHello>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <32915800 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <32915800 received HANDSHAKE>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <HANDSHAKEMESSAGE: Certificate>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <validationCallback: validateErr = 0>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> < cert[0] = [
Version: V3
Subject: CN=10.52.0.3, OU=Revenue Integration Server, O=Office Of The Revenue Commissioners, L=Dublin, ST=Dublin, C=IE
Signature Algorithm: MD5withRSA, OID = 1.2.840.113549.1.1.4
Key: SunJSSE RSA public key:
public exponent:
010001
modulus:
ac47cae5 45e55fe4 8ec06362 84aab923 af35d7f1 8b7e8aaa 32772d8a d8185106
0ba91363 07162207 6eaa33b4 db8a3fbb 1e228e93 841ff322 e319242a 04ae7447
Validity: [From: Mon May 31 16:45:21 BST 2004,
               To: Thu May 29 16:45:21 BST 2014]
Issuer: CN=Revenue CA, OU=Revenue Certificate Authority, O=Office Of The Revenue Commissioners, L=Dublin, ST=Dublin, C=IE
SerialNumber: [    05]
Certificate Extensions: 4
[1]: ObjectId: 2.16.840.1.113730.1.13 Criticality=false
Extension unknown: DER encoded OCTET string =
0000: 04 1F 16 1D 4F 70 65 6E 53 53 4C 20 47 65 6E 65 ....OpenSSL Gene
0010: 72 61 74 65 64 20 43 65 72 74 69 66 69 63 61 74 rated Certificat
0020: 65 e
[2]: ObjectId: 2.5.29.14 Criticality=false
SubjectKeyIdentifier [
KeyIdentifier [
0000: D7 B3 92 7B C7 4E 2F 5D F3 97 CB 3B F9 FB 0A 1E .....N/]...;....
0010: 97 C5 DD F1 ....
[3]: ObjectId: 2.5.29.35 Criticality=false
AuthorityKeyIdentifier [
KeyIdentifier [
0000: D2 66 DD FC 06 C2 BC 7E 18 D5 64 38 AD 6E D0 0A .f........d8.n..
0010: AA 97 05 0D ....
[CN=Revenue CA, OU=Revenue Certificate Authority, O=Office Of The Revenue Commissioners, L=Dublin, ST=Dublin, C=IE]
SerialNumber: [    00]
[4]: ObjectId: 2.5.29.19 Criticality=false
BasicConstraints:[
CA:false
PathLen: undefined
Algorithm: [MD5withRSA]
Signature:
0000: 57 B6 54 4E 1A 54 91 66 5C A8 FE AF B6 50 AB 23 W.TN.T.f\....P.#
0010: 6A 32 42 77 06 44 D5 7D 40 81 E4 DD 84 E3 7B 55 [email protected]
0020: 96 A6 BC E9 E9 51 96 B9 E4 01 56 F9 41 B7 0C C3 .....Q....V.A...
0030: 0A 92 C0 17 6E 6B 9D D6 9A 87 6D 6E 15 5A 86 F4 ....nk....mn.Z..
]>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> < cert[1] = [
Version: V3
Subject: CN=Revenue CA, OU=Revenue Certificate Authority, O=Office Of The Revenue Commissioners, L=Dublin, ST=Dublin, C=IE
Signature Algorithm: MD5withRSA, OID = 1.2.840.113549.1.1.4
Key: SunJSSE RSA public key:
public exponent:
010001
modulus:
bc61b29f a830c97a 7a76883e 1665a241 a68b891f 8e4167eb 62e578ac 9e342c3e
53c9de8b e756634b e364010f 4d36c1c5 21a65b37 b64b4861 6f4dda29 b932191f
Validity: [From: Mon May 31 15:22:15 BST 2004,
               To: Thu May 29 15:22:15 BST 2014]
Issuer: CN=Revenue CA, OU=Revenue Certificate Authority, O=Office Of The Revenue Commissioners, L=Dublin, ST=Dublin, C=IE
SerialNumber: [    00]
Certificate Extensions: 3
[1]: ObjectId: 2.5.29.14 Criticality=false
SubjectKeyIdentifier [
KeyIdentifier [
0000: D2 66 DD FC 06 C2 BC 7E 18 D5 64 38 AD 6E D0 0A .f........d8.n..
0010: AA 97 05 0D ....
[2]: ObjectId: 2.5.29.35 Criticality=false
AuthorityKeyIdentifier [
KeyIdentifier [
0000: D2 66 DD FC 06 C2 BC 7E 18 D5 64 38 AD 6E D0 0A .f........d8.n..
0010: AA 97 05 0D ....
[CN=Revenue CA, OU=Revenue Certificate Authority, O=Office Of The Revenue Commissioners, L=Dublin, ST=Dublin, C=IE]
SerialNumber: [    00]
[3]: ObjectId: 2.5.29.19 Criticality=true
BasicConstraints:[
CA:true
PathLen:2147483647
Algorithm: [MD5withRSA]
Signature:
0000: 3C 64 7C 9E 0B 90 48 9D 70 74 06 80 7F 2C AF 73 <d....H.pt...,.s
0010: 92 1C C3 39 DD C3 45 B6 A4 8E 11 27 8E 21 18 4B ...9..E....'.!.K
0020: FD AA 31 5E 35 FC DF 9E 70 42 F4 65 5C DF 56 9A ..1^5...pB.e\.V.
0030: DD 8C 6B B7 3B BE E5 A7 D5 4A 16 23 C1 91 07 CA ..k.;....J.#....
]>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLTrustValidator returns: 0>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:24 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <Trust status (0): NONE>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <Performing hostname validation checks: 10.51.0.1>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <32915800 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <32915800 received HANDSHAKE>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <HANDSHAKEMESSAGE: ServerHelloDone>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write HANDSHAKE, offset = 0, length = 70>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write CHANGE_CIPHER_SPEC, offset = 0, length = 1>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write HANDSHAKE, offset = 0, length = 16>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <32915800 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <32915800 received CHANGE_CIPHER_SPEC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <32915800 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <32915800 received HANDSHAKE>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <HANDSHAKEMESSAGE: Finished>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write APPLICATION_DATA, offset = 0, length = 0>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <write APPLICATION_DATA, offset = 0, length = 270>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <30340343 read(offset=0, length=2048)>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <isMuxerActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <SSLFilter.isActivated: false>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TLS> <000000> <32915800 SSL3/TLS MAC>
<29-Sep-2006 16:29:28 o'clock IST> <Debug> <TL

You will need an AAM set with the internal (http) address.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ajithas/archive/2009/09/11/alternate-access-mapping-in-reverse-proxy-configuration.aspx
Dimitri Ayrapetov (MCSE: SharePoint)

SA540 Firewall Rules Fail when Optional Port Configured to Failover

Today, I configured a client's SA540 for failover. The primary WAN port is FIOS with a static IP address. The optional port is Road Runner cable with a static IP address. The failover tested successfully. However, now the SA540 cannot be accessed on its internal IP address (https://192.168.1.1) and none of the firewall rules work any longer. There are several rules but to name two; remote desktop port forwarding to an internal server, and HTTPS to another internal server. Both rules use IP addresses different than the SA540's WAN IP address. Additional external IP addresses were configured previously and assigned and they worked up to the point were the failover was configured.
Now here is the strange part. If the optional port cable is removed from the port, everything returns to normal, but plug it back in and problems. I even tried disabling failover in the SA540's configuration and it made no difference unless the cable was unplugged.
As you might imagine the client is upset about this. Anyone have any ideas?
The firmware is 2.1.18.
Tony
PS. About an hour after I posted this, I tried moving the remote desktop external connection from one of the additional IP addresses configured in the SA540 to the dedicated WAN address and remote desktop sessions were then forwarded into the correct server. Apparently, the additional IP addresses are not working with the two ISP failover configured, or at least it doesn't work in my configuration. Any help on this would be much appreciated. The additional IP addresses are configured in the same subnet as the dedicated (primary) WAN port. Again, this worked until failover with another ISP was configured.

This issue has been resolved. After much testing and discussions with the great guys at Cisco TAC, we determined that Verizon FIOS is doing something on their routers to defeat use of IP aliasing. If you have FIOS and you must have more than one IP address and expect to create an IP alias to direct traffic in a 1 to 1 NAT to a node on your network, FIOS doesn’t work. Contact with Verizon technical support is no help. They are oblivious to the problem and don’t want to be bothered.
Tony Lombardi

Configuring System Landscape in EP6 SP2

Please suggest a "definitive resource" for configuring our system landscape between EP6.0 SP2 and our R/3 systems, complimenting what we had configured in EP5.0 via the jcodestination.xml and systems.xml.
thank you!

Hi Jeff,
this is for NW04 portal, but most of it should be valid for EP6SP2 as well..
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/0d/17df3d2cae445ae10000000a11405a/content.htm
cheers,

Configuring Automatic Failover for EPM Planning Cluster

We are trying to test automatic failover using a Planning(11.1.2.2)/weblogic cluster containing 2 physical servers and a Weblogic proxy plug-in for OHS.
I understand that to enable this we must configure in-memory replication of HTTP session states and to do this, (according to various sources including ID 779350.1) the weblogic.xml file must include a descriptor set up as follows:
<session-descriptor>
   <session-param>
    <param-name>PersistentStoreType</param-name>
    <param-value>replicated</param-value>
</session-param>
</session-descriptio>
Where should weblogic.xml be created or amended (if it already exists) for a Planning cluster in a standard scaled out EPM deployment in order to effect failover between the two servers.
Thanks

yes, it can be load balanced in hyperion registry i believe, seen it once only drawback is ,if a JVM goes down while processing a request it needs to be manually started, however the url will switch automatically

Question on configuring DHCP failover on 2012

Is it possible to have dhcp A replicate all scopes as hot standby to dhcp B. Then have 1 single scope on DHCP B (thats not a scope on dhcp A) be replicated to dhcp A.
So basically I have Replication going in both directions. One for all scope from A to B and 1 single scope from B to A.
Can this be done?

Hi Rondefino,
It can be achieved.
We could configure failover for every scopes separately.
Server B could be the standby server for the scopes on server A. And server A could be the standby server for the scopes on server B. They will replicate automatically.
Here is the guide for configuring failover:
Step-by-Step: Configure DHCP for Failover:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831385.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
Best Regards,
Leo
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Problem with the EP6 SP10 Patch 1 Post Install (VERY URGENT)

Hello,
My installation seems to be well done.
But when I try to do the first connection on the portal, I sign-in the system and it returns errors like :
"Portal Runtime error
An exception occurred while processing a request for :
iView : pcd:portal_content/every_user/general/defaultDesktop/frameworkPages/frameworkpage
Component Name : com.sap.portal.pagebuilder.pageBuilder
The exception was logged. Inform your system administrator..
Exception id: 04:29_01/02/05_0003_7226250
See the details for the exception ID in the log file"
Is there one of you who can help me to solve my problem.
It is very urgent
Thanks in advance
Regards
Humbert

Hello,
The console logs contain no information bout my problem but I looked in the directory :
e:\usr\sap\DP1\DVEBMGS00\work and here is the contain of the file std_server0.out
PatchLevel 88028.313 December 22, 2004 20:48 GMT
> service DQE ================= ERROR =================
Feb 2, 2005 11:03:28 AM ...Thread.SingleThread.run().OutOfMemory [SAPEngine_System_Thread[impl:5]_63] Fatal:
Feb 2, 2005 11:03:28 AM ...Thread.SingleThread.run().OutOfMemory [SAPEngine_System_Thread[impl:5]_53] Fatal:
Feb 2, 2005 11:03:28 AM ...Thread.SingleThread.run().OutOfMemory [SAPEngine_System_Thread[impl:5]_50] Fatal:
Feb 2, 2005 11:03:30 AM ...Thread.SingleThread.run().OutOfMemory [SAPEngine_System_Thread[impl:5]_30] Fatal:
stdout/stderr redirect
node name   : server0
pid         : 1820
system name : DP1
system nr. : 00
started at : Wed Feb 02 11:03:37 2005
CompilerOracle: exclude com/sapportals/portal/pb/layout/taglib/ContainerTag addIviewResources
CompilerOracle: exclude com/sap/engine/services/keystore/impl/security/CodeBasedSecurityConnector getApplicationDomain
CompilerOracle: exclude com/sap/engine/services/rmi_p4/P4StubSkeletonGenerator generateStub
CompilerOracle: exclude com/sapportals/portal/prt/util/StringUtils escapeToJS
CompilerOracle: exclude iaik/security/md/SHA a
CompilerOracle: exclude com/sapportals/portal/prt/core/broker/PortalServiceItem startServices
CompilerOracle: exclude com/sap/engine/services/webservices/server/deploy/WSConfigurationHandler downloadFile
CompilerOracle: exclude com/sapportals/portal/prt/jndisupport/util/AbstractHierarchicalContext lookup
SAP J2EE Engine Version 6.40   PatchLevel 88028.313 is starting...
Loading: LogManager ... 609 ms.
Loading: PoolManager ... 0 ms.
Loading: ApplicationThreadManager ... 94 ms.
Loading: ThreadManager ... 15 ms.
Loading: IpVerificationManager ... 16 ms.
Loading: ClassLoaderManager ... 15 ms.
Loading: ClusterManager ... 250 ms.
Loading: LockingManager ... 63 ms.
Loading: ConfigurationManager ... 1031 ms.
Loading: LicensingManager ... 31 ms.
Loading: ServiceManager ...
Loading services.:
Service runtimeinfo started. (78 ms).
Service cross started. (125 ms).
Service file started. (125 ms).
Service timeout started. (125 ms).
Service memory started. (156 ms).
Service jmx_notification started. (203 ms).
Service trex.service started. (266 ms).
Service userstore started. (31 ms).
Service tcsecvsi~service started. (297 ms).
Service p4 started. (343 ms).
Service classpath_resolver started. (16 ms).
Service tcsecwssec~service started. (390 ms).
Service deploy started. (2656 ms).
Service apptracing started. (172 ms).
Service log_configurator started. (8031 ms).
Service locking started. (0 ms).
Service http started. (172 ms).
Service naming started. (297 ms).
Service failover started. (62 ms).
Service ts started. (109 ms).
Service appclient started. (140 ms).
Service javamail started. (156 ms).
Service licensing started. (16 ms).
Service jmsconnector started. (172 ms).
Service connector started. (234 ms).
Service configuration started. (16 ms).
Service webservices started. (578 ms).
Service dbpool started. (5343 ms).
Service com.sap.security.core.ume.service started. (2547 ms).
Service security started. (2203 ms).
Service classload started. (109 ms).
Service applocking started. (156 ms).
Service shell started. (344 ms).
Service tceCATTPingservice started. (47 ms).
Service telnet started. (78 ms).
Service keystore started. (516 ms).
Service ssl started. (16 ms).
Service webdynpro started. (172 ms).
Service tcsecsecurestorage~service started. (109 ms).
Service ejb started. (781 ms).
Service servlet_jsp started. (813 ms).
Service dsr started. (343 ms).
Service tcsecdestinations~service started. (141 ms).
Service rfcengine started. (109 ms).
Service jmx started. (829 ms).
Service pmi started. (203 ms).
Service prtbridge started. (688 ms).
Service basicadmin started. (703 ms).
Service adminadapter started. (93 ms).
Service sld started. (1234 ms).
Service monitor started. (672 ms).
Service com.sap.portal.prt.sapj2ee started. (109 ms).
Excluding compile: iaik.security.md.SHA::a
Service jms_provider started. (2954 ms).
service DQE ================= ERROR =================
Service tc.monitoring.logviewer started. (4266 ms).
ServiceManager started for 26532 ms.
Framework started for 28844 ms.
SAP J2EE Engine Version 6.40   PatchLevel 88028.313 is running!
PatchLevel 88028.313 December 22, 2004 20:48 GMT
> service DQE ================= ERROR =================
Regards
Humbert

EJB access from C++ client / Failover+LoadBalancing

We are accessing an EJB from VisiBroker for C++. The EJB is deployed in a WLS cluster.
Trying to achieve something like 'failover', we discovered that VisiBroker supports
multiloc addresses, so we are able to start our client as follows:
./client -ORBInitRef NameService=corbaloc::server1:8001,:server2:8002/NameService
As a result, server2 is only used when NameService of server1 is not available.
After connecting to a distinct NameService in a cluster, all further IIOP calls
are routed to this cluster server only. If the server shuts down, a new NameService
connection has to be made to get access to the other server and its objects.
Is this correct so far?
For the idea of 'load balancing' our EJB accesses, we didn't find a solution -
so it seems that this is completely impossible or is there any trick we could
use?
Thanks for your help
ml

"Marko Lorentz" <[email protected]> writes:
We are accessing an EJB from VisiBroker for C++. The EJB is deployed in a WLS cluster.
Trying to achieve something like 'failover', we discovered that VisiBroker supports
multiloc addresses, so we are able to start our client as follows:
./client -ORBInitRef NameService=corbaloc::server1:8001,:server2:8002/NameService
As a result, server2 is only used when NameService of server1 is not available.
After connecting to a distinct NameService in a cluster, all further IIOP calls
are routed to this cluster server only. If the server shuts down, a new NameService
connection has to be made to get access to the other server and its objects.
Is this correct so far?
For the idea of 'load balancing' our EJB accesses, we didn't find a solution -
so it seems that this is completely impossible or is there any trick we could
use?If you use the Tuxedo 8.1 C++ client, then you will get per-request
load-balancing and failover. The C++ client is free to WLS licensees.
andy

How to Configure Exchange server in EP6.0

Hi
How to configure mailing server in Portal
With Regards
Azhar

Hi Azhar
You can specify your mail server on the Portal.
Go to System Administration -> System Configuration -> UM Configuration.
You will find a field there to specify your mail Server.
You may also have to specify this in the config tool of your WAS Server to enable email notification
Take a look at <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/07/9bda3d5ed05610e10000000a114084/frameset.htm">this</a> .
Hope that helps.
Best Regards
Priya

FEX-Uplink failover, loadbalancing

I wish to understand more the technology within a vblock
I will progressively have a few questions
So here I go. pls be patient and thanks in advance...
VBlock 720 with the following generic config
2x Cisco 5000 Series Switch
2x FI 6248
6x Chassis 5108
FEX 2204
VIC 1240 (no Mezzanine Card)
8x M3 Blade, 2 CPU
4 x 10 G uplinks from each FEX to FI (port channel)
8 x 10 G uplink from each FI to Ciso 5000 series swith (vpc)
Assumptions:
All Chassis are fully populate
Each blade has consistient bandwidth thoroughput but of 6 GB
When the blades connect to FEX A and FEX B, are the connections active active?
For exampleIs blades 1 and 5 pinned to the same FEX port(s) on the same FEX?
What is the method that load balances blade pinging?
Assume Uplink 1 fails between FEX A and FI A, is Uplink 1 on FEX B overutilized.
How does the VM decide which CNA port to send traffic?
That it for now...

see inline
When the blades connect to FEX A and FEX B, are the connections active active?
I assume you mean FEX=IOM in the chassis;
Yes both fabrics are active; all VIC are dual homed to fabric a and b
For exampleIs blades 1 and 5 pinned to the same FEX port(s) on the same FEX?
You have the choice of static pinning (done by UCS Manager) blade slot to a IOM Uplink, or define a port channel between IOM and fabric Interconnect; port channel is the preferred mode.
Static pinning depends on IOM model, 2204 / 2208 and the number of uplinks, e.g.
2204 and 4 uplinks
chassis slot 1 and 5 -> uplink 1
chassis slot 2 and 6 -> uplink 2
2208 and 8 uplinks
chassis slot 1 -> uplink 1
chassis slot 2 -> uplink 2
With static pinning, if a uplinks fails, the corresponding slots fabric a or b, are down; there is no repinning to the remaining uplinks; teaming and multipathing will take appropriate action.
If you have a port channel, and you loose a link, no problem, as long as there is at least one link up; your bandwith will decrease, but th vnic/vhba are still up
What is the method that load balances blade pinging?
Don't understand; please be more specific
Assume Uplink 1 fails between FEX A and FI A, is Uplink 1 on FEX B overutilized.
Yes, in principle ! but you have to design oversubscription end to end anyway !
How does the VM decide which CNA port to send traffic?
This depends on the hypervisor; take e.g. VMware ESXi and vswitch: load balancing can be configured per switch and / or port-group; important caveat: don't use IP hash, because fabric interconnect doesn't support LACP; by default its originating virtual¨port id.

Configuring Delayed Failover / Loadbalancing -EP6 SP10

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for