Configuring static routes at the network edge

We have some Cisco 1750 routers at the edge of our network which are running RIP. We were advised to use static routes on the router, since there was only one route (across a WAN link) for traffic to go from the hub connected to the router, as RIP would only waste the limited bandwidth to the router. We posted this problem previously and got a response which stated :You could set up a default static route on your edge router, run RIP on your internal routers in order to propagate the default, but block the RIP to the outside.
On your edge router, make a default route to your external link. Keep RIP running as before, but add the line redistribute static in your rip configuration. That will get the default route propagated.
Now to stop the RIP on the external interface: If the link is on a different major IP network to your internal network, you can simply not include it in the network commands under rip. But if it is in the same network, then RIP will be enabled on the interface, so you will have to add passive-interface xxxxx, where xxxxx refers to the interface carrying your external link,
Alternatively, you could define your default route using the ip default-network command. This will get propagated automatically into the RIP even without the redistribute command.
We tried it, the problem is that the router is unreachable, via the serial or Ethernet, although if connected to the router via console port, with the configuration screen , you are able to ping external locations, and are able to telnet into the router, but he PC's on the Ethernet side of the router cant see the network.
Assistance\Advice requested.
attached you wll find , the actual reply , and a copy of some info from our work file.

Ernie
I have looked at the config that you posted and I see several issues. The serial interface on Salvage is 172.20.2.2. Your message indicates that it is connected via serial to a 3640 which your message seems to indicate is 172.20.1.4. But that makes the 3640 on a different subnet. Connections over a serial link should be in the same subnet on both ends. (The exception to that is when you are using the ip unnumbered feature - which you are not). I suspect that part of your problem is that the routers do not see themselves on a connected subnet. When you run RIP over the link it can compensate for that to some degree. But when you stop RIP the problem has impact.
Also I see that you have a static default route as Kevin suggested. And in RIP you have redistribute static. But there is no default metric defined. To redistribute into RIP you need a default metric. Another aspect of the problem with the default route is that the next hop for the default route is 172.20.1.4, but without RIP running I believe that Salvage has no idea how to get to that address. You can confirm this by doing show ip route 172.20.1.4 on Salvage. I suspect that you will get an error about route not in table.
Beyond these issues I believe that there is a larger problem of misunderstanding. When I look at your original post in this thread it talks about not running RIP over the serial link. And when I read Kevin's response the first paragraph is describing not running RIP over the serial interface when it says do static default on your edge router and run RIP on your internal router. If you are not running RIP over the serial interface then I see no reason to run RIP on Salvage at all. There is one piece of this that Kevin did not address. If you do not run RIP over the serial link then how does the 3640 know about the Ethernet subnet at Salvage. I believe that the answer is that the 3640 needs to configure a static route to 172.20.27.0 with the 1750 serial interface as the next hop. And if there are other routers that the 3640 communicates with via RIP then the 3640 needs to redistribute static into RIP (remembering to have a default metric).
If you address these issues I believe that you will have connectivity from the central network to the remote subnet on Salvage.
HTH
Rick

Similar Messages

  • Configuring Static Route Tracking Using ASDM 7.1(3) ASA 9.1(2)

    I have recently updated my ASA5520 to 9.1(2) and I am using ASDM 7.1(3) to configure Static Route Tracking. I have done this previoussy in earlier version of ASDM without a problem.  There seems to be a new field in the Tracked Options section.  What is the "Target Interface"?  Is it the interface I want to use as the standby route when the Monitor fails? Or is it the Interface that is doing the monitoring?
    I have looked through Cisco ASA Series General Operations ASDM Configuration Guide Software Version 7.1, as well as older ASDM books and this field is never listed or described.

    Hi,
    The target interface will be the interface through which you will be polling some destination IP address with ICMP Echos to determine if the route through that interface is still valid.
    So in your case you would use "Outside"
    Heres the link to the ASA Command Reference listing the above "type" command under the "sla monitor 1" configuration
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/command-reference/t2.html#wp1568359
    - Jouni

  • How can I configure static routes in a CUCM?

    Hi.
    I have seen that there is no-way to set static routes in a Call Manager but I have read that you can add static routes in the Linux that runs CUCM.
    If I do that, will I l lose the Cisco support for that server?
    I don't know why a Level 3 server (like a CUCM, Presence , Unity,...) doesn't permit routing configuration.
    Regards.
    Rafa

    Thanks for your answer, Jaime.
    That implies that we have to insert an intermediate router.
    I think that routing features should be implemented in Unified Comunications servers.
    Regards

  • NO LONGER ABLE TO UPLOAD "NO CONFIGURED COMPUTER FOUND ON THE NETWORK" ????

    I am stumped because I have uploaded pictures for a long time with no trouble to my computer and it doesn't matter what program software I use whether its Picasa or I photo or any other I assume, I get this message:
    "no configured computer found on the network"
    and if I use and flash drive it says:
    "device selected is not active."
    No matter what method I use on my MAC Tiger and no matter what program whether its Picasa or Iphoto and where i try to load them from whether its a camera or a card reader or through the slot on my printer, i keep getting the message "no configured computer found on the network" and if I use and flash drive it says device selected is not active.
    I don't get it. I've uploaded pictures all kinds of times to my computer without this trouble. Where do i need to look, I assume at the computer because it doesn't matter which method I use to load them the computer doesn't work.
    software, computer, hardware, what????

    I'm sorry, I apologize, I left a follow-up here when I realized it was DUH not connected with my cable? Like what an idiot. I don't have enough ports and so I had unplugged it.
    I know I left a followup but maybe it wasn't saved. Again, sorry. Thanks for your response.

  • Configuring Static Routing

    Hi, I have some issues configuring my WRT54G in my business, I've already got 2 networks and i want to create a new one with my router.. The main network where all our servers are is the 192.168.1.0/24 (gateway 192.168.1.1), second network is 192.168.2.0/24 (gateway 192.168.2.1)
    What i want to do: Create the network 192.168.102.0/24 wich could communicate directly with the 192.168.2.0 network but 192.168.102.0 need to talk with the 192.168.1.0 network too. I guess i should connect the 192.168.2.0 in the Internet port, and the 192.168.102.0 in the Ethernet ports.
    How should i setup my router ?? Do i need to create Static Ip routes on my computer in the 192.168.102.0 network?? Thanks!
    Message Edited by Goyette on 12-10-2007 01:25 PM

    1}192.168.0.1/24
    2}192.168.0.2/24
    3}192.168.102.0/24 {want to create}
    The most important thing i want to know how the above two network are connected to each other. And which router you are using.
    Then we will move foward

  • Is it possible in IOS to have two static routes for the same subnet, one a higher priority and "failover" between the 2?

    Hi All
    Is it possible in IOS to have for a particular subnet:
    a) Two static routes?
    b) Make one static route a higher priority than the other?
    c) If one static router "goes down", failover to the lower priority static route?
    We have a l2tp/vpdn connection to a supplier which can be accessed via two vlans/routes. I would like to make one route the preferred one but the "route" to failover if the preferred route goes down.
    Again, many thanks in advance for all responses!
    Thanks
    John

    Hi John,
    Hope the below explaination will help you...
    R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2
    R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 3.3.3.3 10
    If you notice the Administrative Distance for the secondary route pointing to ISP2 is increased to 10 so that it becomes the backup link.
    The above configuration with just two floating static routes partially accomplishes our requirement as it will work only in the scenario where the routers interfaces connected to the WAN link are in up/down or down/down status. But in a lot of situations we see that even though the links remain up but we are not able to reach the gateway, this usually happens when the issue is at the ISP side.
    In such scenarios, IP SLAs becomes an engineer's best friend. With around six additional IOS commands we can have a more reliable automatic failover environment.
    Using IP SLA the Cisco IOS gets the ability to use Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) pings to identify when a WAN link goes down at the remote end and hence allows the initiation of a backup connection from an alternative port. The Reliable Static Routing Backup using Object Tracking feature can ensure reliable backup in the case of several catastrophic events, such as Internet circuit failure or peer device failure.
    IP SLA is configured to ping a target, such as a publicly routable IP address or a target inside the corporate network or your next-hop IP on the ISP's router. The pings are routed from the primary interface only. Following a sample configuration of IP SLA to generate icmp ping targeted at the ISP1s next-hop IP.
    R1(config)# ip sla 1
    R1(config)# icmp-echo 2.2.2.2 source-interface FastEthernet0/0
    R1(config)# timeout 1000
    R1(config)# threshold 2
    R1(config)# frequency 3
    R1(config)# ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now
    The above configuration defines and starts an IP SLA probe.
    The ICMP Echo probe sends an ICMP Echo packet to next-hop IP 2.2.2.2 every 3 seconds, as defined by the “frequency” parameter.
    Timeout sets the amount of time (in milliseconds) for which the Cisco IOS IP SLAs operation waits for a response from its request packet.
    Threshold sets the rising threshold that generates a reaction event and stores history information for the Cisco IOS IP SLAs operation.
    After defining the IP SLA operation our next step is to define an object that tracks the SLA probe. This can be accomplished by using the IOS Track Object as shown below:
    R1(config)# track 1 ip sla 1 reachability
    The above command will track the state of the IP SLA operation. If there are no ping responses from the next-hop IP the track will go down and it will come up when the ip sla operation starts receiving ping response.
    To verify the track status use the use the “show track” command as shown below:
    R1# show track
    Track 1
    IP SLA 1 reachability
    Reachability is Down
    1 change, last change 00:03:19
    Latest operation return code: Unknown
    The above output shows that the track status is down. Every IP SLAs operation maintains an operation return-code value. This return code is interpreted by the tracking process. The return code may return OK, OverThreshold, and several other return codes.
    Different operations may have different return-code values, so only values common to all operation types are used. The below table shows the track states as per the IP SLA return code.
    Tracking
    Return Code
    Track State
    Reachability
    OK or over threshold
    (all other return codes)
    Up
    Down
    The Last step in the IP SLA Reliable Static Route configuration is to add the “track” statement to the default routes pointing to the ISP routers as shown below:
    R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2 track 1
    R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 3.3.3.3 10
    The track number keyword and argument combination specifies that the static route will be installed only if the state of the configured track object is up. Hence if the track status is down the secondary route will be used to forward all the traffic.
    Please rate the helpfull posts.
    Regards,
    Naidu.

  • How to configure static route on RHEL 3 A/S

    I have a (very) large amount of data to move through a Gigabit connection
    shortly. I want to use a newly-configured gigabit PCI-X card in a Dell
    server to accomplish this. The other interfaces are 100 Mbps.
    If I want to add a route (static route) to force outgoing packets that
    are destined for a particular host to use that interface (eth3 on this host)
    then how do I do that? System is RedHat Enterprise Linux 3AS.
    I suspect this involved the "add route default" command or whatever
    the syntax is -- I did it for Solaris years ago but don't remember
    exactly.
    $ Linux host1.localdomain 2.4.21-57.ELhugemem #1 SMP Fri Jun 13 00:09:04 EDT 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
    $ ifconfig eth3
    eth3 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0A:5E:7A:E7:33
    inet addr:10.156.30.176 Bcast:10.156.30.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
    UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
    RX packets:619971 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
    TX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
    collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
    RX bytes:44019924 (41.9 Mb) TX bytes:256 (256.0 b)
    Interrupt:24
    Thanks in advance.

    I agree. Using the /binroute command is not recommended for newbies, or even oldies. There is more infrastructure behind the scenes than just the routing table and using the "redhat-config-network" or "system-config-network" tool does the right thing, so you don't have to.
    I mentioned it only for completeness.

  • Need help configuring VPN - problems accessing the networks

    Hi everyone, hope someone can help me out here.
    I'm administering the network for our small company. We basically have two sets of machines - public ones with fixed net addresses (mail, web, dns servers, etc), and private ones behind a wireless router/nat.
    Our main need here is to be able to VPN in to the public side, in particular, the mailserver, so that we can get around all the stupid things that get done to SMTP when we connect at the BedBug Inn ("Free wifi, administered by gibbons").
    Secondarily, it would be nice to be able to connect to and browse some of the internal machines.
    So here is what I did:
    * Installed 10.4.10 Server on a machine with two ethernet interfaces, one that has a public IP address, the other connects into the private network. When I'm actually at that machine, things work fine - I can browse the private network shares, connect to the net, etc.
    * Configured VPN. I have no problems getting a VPN connection, both sides are happy. The VPN assigns incoming clients IP addresses in the private network IP range, but outside those assigned by the wireless router's NAT.
    * Added 192.168.2.1/255 (the private network) and 12.17.29.193/224 (the public network) to the Network Routing Definition box under VPN/Settings/Client Information.
    However, here's where it all falls down. Once the VPN is established, I can't connect to any of the public machines, and the only private-side device that seems to respond is the Wireless/NAT box (A Belkin N1). So the only thing I can do is administer the Belkin remotely, which, while nice, is not exactly what I had in mind.
    Doing a traceroute while VPN is active to my mailserver shows the first hop direct to the VPN machine, then off into * * * heaven (though I have no idea if traceroute works over VPN!).
    One curious note: when I change the order of the Network Routing Definitions so that the public network comes first, and the private one second, I can't contact the Belkin box.
    Any advice, oh wise and powerful masters of technology?
    Various, but the server is running on a G4   Mac OS X (10.4.10)  

    I said:
    "let's assume I VPN to the wireless box"
    You replied:
    "That's not correct as it is not the device running the VPN endpoint - in this case. "
    But wouldn't I have to (on the VPN client) specify the public IP of the wireless box in order connect (because the packets are forwarded) to the actual OS X box running the VPN? Otherwise, it can't see it.
    Part of the problem I have is that I can't dedicate a whole machine to VPN. The OS X machine running VPN is also running DNS, and will eventually run our mailserver and perhaps FTP, web, etc, as I slowly migrate stuff to it.
    So this machine has to have a public IP address. It cannot be hidden behind the wireless NAT. And it seems to me that this is the crux of the problem. What I think you are telling me is that if the VPN machine was entirely hidden behind the wireless NAT, and had no direct public (WAN) interface, then since all the packets destined for the outside world (including my public servers)would have to go through the NAT, and all would be OK.
    If so, then it seems to me that the best solution is to use something like OpenVPN on another OS X (not OS X Server, since I only have one of those) machine in the private network. Since the incoming VPN traffic will be Mac only, it shouldn't be an issue, L2TP-only is fine.
    "Otherwise you have to run NAT and the firewall in the VPN server too and use private IPs for VPN clients - or use "only" it (remove the other NAT box and put it on the LAN only). Using only one device for NAT/gw means less configuration."
    It is entirely unclear to me, in my setup, what effect turning on NAT on the VPN box (or perhaps, just IP forwarding) would have -- and if I do turn on NAT, would I still have the VPN assign IP's to clients in the internal private network's range, or would I use a different range (ie: private is 192.168.237.xxx, VPN assigns 192.168.239.xxx) and expect the NAT to handle the conversion?
    I'm a bit leery of just trying it and seeing what happens because it if mucks things up so badly that the server becomes unreachable (via server admin), I'll have to schlep down to the office to fix it.
    "Other things to consider is "bottlenecks" between your LAN and WAN."
    Not a real issue. We have a small office, and a relatively small pipe to the internet. Most of the traffic from that pipe is from the public machines anyway. The traffic that goes through the wireless router is basically websurfing and hitting the mailserver.
    I could, of course, use the VPN OS X machine as the NAT/DHCP server, and hang the wireless router off the internal network as a simple access point. But would that resolve all the VPN issues?
    Once again, thanks for your helpful and prompt replies.

  • Updating hybrid configuration failed - Kerberos authentication: The network path was not found

    I'm configuring Exchange 2010 SP3 as a Hybrid server with Exchange Online. This is a single server running Exchange roles Mailbox, Client Access, Unified Messaging and Hub Transport.
    When I run the Manage Hybrid Configuration, I receive the following error:
    Updating hybrid configuration failed with error
    'System.Management.Automation.Remoting.PSRemotingTransportException: Connecting to remote server failed with the following error message : WinRM cannot process the request. The following error occurred while using Kerberos authentication: The network
    path was not found.
    The full text from the Hybrid Configuration log file (C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\Logging\Update-HybridConfiguration)
    [1/5/2014 21:21:1] INFO:Opening runspace to
    http://[servername]/powershell?serializationLevel=Full
    [1/5/2014 21:21:1] INFO:Disconnected from On-Premises session
    [1/5/2014 21:21:1] ERROR:Updating hybrid configuration failed with error 'System.Management.Automation.Remoting.PSRemotingTransportException: Connecting to remote server failed with the following error message : WinRM cannot process the request. The following
    error occured while using Kerberos authentication: The network path was not found. 
     Possible causes are:
      -The user name or password specified are invalid.
      -Kerberos is used when no authentication method and no user name are specified.
      -Kerberos accepts domain user names, but not local user names.
      -The Service Principal Name (SPN) for the remote computer name and port does not exist.
      -The client and remote computers are in different domains and there is no trust between the two domains.
     After checking for the above issues, try the following:
      -Check the Event Viewer for events related to authentication.
      -Change the authentication method; add the destination computer to the WinRM TrustedHosts configuration setting or use HTTPS transport.
     Note that computers in the TrustedHosts list might not be authenticated.
       -For more information about WinRM configuration, run the following command: winrm help config. For more information, see the about_Remote_Troubleshooting Help topic.
       at System.Management.Automation.Runspaces.AsyncResult.EndInvoke()
       at System.Management.Automation.Runspaces.Internal.RunspacePoolInternal.EndOpen(IAsyncResult asyncResult)
       at System.Management.Automation.Runspaces.RunspacePool.Open()
       at System.Management.Automation.RemoteRunspace.Open()
       at Microsoft.Exchange.Management.Hybrid.RemotePowershellSession.Connect(PSCredential credentials, CultureInfo sessionUiCulture)
       at Microsoft.Exchange.Management.Hybrid.Engine.Execute(ILogger logger, String onPremPowershellHost, PSCredential onPremCredentials, PSCredential tenantCredentials, HybridConfiguration hybridConfiguration)
       at Microsoft.Exchange.Management.SystemConfigurationTasks.UpdateHybridConfiguration.InternalProcessRecord()'.
    I have sought help, posting on the forum at community.office365.com -
    http://community.office365.com/en-us/forums/158/t/212265.aspx. But I've got to a point where I believe the problem is more to do with how PowerShell is operating on the on-prem Exchange server.
    Has anyone else come across this problem running the Hybrid Configuration Wizard?

    Hello Darrell,
    Have you verified the settings of Powershell virtual directories for the on-premises Exchange Servers? The following article has a list of some common issues with that virtual directory and how to correct them:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff607221(v=exchg.80).aspxI would take a look at the one titled "Configure Kerberos Authentication" specifically to ensure everything
    looks good.
    As the article states you can run the Exchange BPA and it will check if any of these exist as well.

  • Configured VLAN. after restart, the Network freezes and cannot be recovered

    Hello Community,
    i'm having troubles with my iMac at Work.
    i configured a VLAN to connect to my Network at work. whenever i do this, the network and part of the statusbar freezes.
    i can recover  this issue by deleting the folder /Library/Preferences/SystemConfiguration
    Clearly, this resets my Networkconfiguration and i have to reconfigure the VLAN. otherwise i cannot connect to the internet.
    But as soon as i restart my system, the problem occurs again.
    Thanks for help in advance.
      Modellname:                    

    I don't remember exactly, probably within the last month, as I had just replaced the display on this phone and started using it a couple weeks ago. I rebooted into safe mode and still have the same problem. I can change time, date, am/pm and as soon as I click done, it shows the same wrong info.
    'IN GOD WE TRUST'
    >> Personal information/e-mail reply/headers removed to comply with the Verizon Wireless Terms of Service <<
    Edited by:  Verizon Moderator

  • Static NATs using the network parameter

    If I want one-to-one static NATs which allow inbound traffic, will this work? I want to be able to ping, SSH, etc to 172.18.48.1 by going to 172.18.31.48.1 from the other side of the VPN.
    ip nat inside source static network 172.18.48.0 172.31.48.0 /24 route-map VPN_Somerset_NAT-rm reversible
    route-map VPN_Somerset_NAT-rm permit 10
     match ip address VPN_Somerset_NAT-ACL
    ip access-list extended VPN_Somerset_NAT-ACL
     permit ip 172.18.48.0 0.0.0.255 10.61.0.0 0.0.255.255

    To translate the real address 10.1.1.1 to the mapped address 192.168.1.1 when 10.1.1.1 sends traffic to the 209.165.200.224 network, the access-list and static commands are as follows:
    hostname(config)# access-list TEST extended ip host 10.1.1.1 209.165.200.224
    255.255.255.224
    hostname(config)# static (inside,outside) 192.168.1.1 access-list TEST
    In this case, the second address is the destination address. However, the same configuration is used for hosts to originate a connection to the mapped address. For example, when a host on the 209.165.200.224/27 network initiates a connection to 192.168.1.1, then the second address in the access list is the source address.
    This access list should include only permit ACEs. You can optionally specify the real and destination ports in the access list using the eq operator. Policy NAT does not consider the inactive or time-range keywords; all ACEs are considered to be active for policy NAT configuration. See the "Policy NAT" section for more information.
    If you specify a network for translation (for example, 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0), then the ASA translates the .0 and .255 addresses. If you want to prevent access to these addresses, be sure to configure an access list to deny access.

  • Verifying asymmetric routing in the network

    Hello Everyone,
    In our network the CE router is connected via two links to core switch. I have to verify for asymmetric routing.
    Someone suggested me to run:
    sh ip bgp neighbors <ip address> received-routes
    sh ip bgp neighbors <ip address> advertised-routes
    on both core switch and CE router and check if advertised routes and received routes are same.
    Is there a better way to verify asymmetric routing ?
    Thanks.

    Hello.
    There is no way to check asymmetric routing, unless you are continuously looking into traffic flows (because at the moment it might be symmetric, but in a day everything could be changed).
    But your design might guarantee that no asymmetric routing is possible.
    Could you share your routing protocol settings you are using? And what asymmetry (please provide an example) is undesirable and why?

  • When issuing a 'show ip route' for a subnet which is not installed in the router's routing table, is it feasible to get the configured default route as the output/answer ?

    I thought it was even recall I've seen this before but when tried a couple of days ago didnt get the answer I was expecting... tried to find some documentations but couldnt. Thanks for any clue on this.

    Try  show ip route  10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 longer-prefixes
    Hope it helps

  • Configuring MPLS VPN using static routing

    Hi,
    I am managed to set up a BGP/MPLS VPN in a laboratory using CS3620 routers running IOS 12.2(3) with ISIS. I am thinking of using static routes among the PE and P routers instead of a IGP. Does anyone know if Cisco routers supports static configuration of LSP? I have tried but could not get it work.

    You can very well run MPLS with static routing in the core, as in Cisco we have to meet 2 criterias to have a MPLS forwarding Table.
    1) Creating the LIB
    This thing lies in having LDP neighborship netween two peers and you have Label bindings.
    This is irrespective of what is the best next hop to reach the advertising peers LDP_ID.
    2) Creating the LFIB
    Now after considering all the Label bindings, the LDP_ID which can be reached out an interface
    as a next hop, those Label bindings get installed in the LFIB.
    So considering the above two points, we have to be careful in static routes
    only for interfaces like Ethernet (Multiaccess Segments).
    As in CEF when you give a static route pointing to an Ethernet Interface, CEF creates a
    GLean Adjacency (Meaning there could be multiple hosts as the next hop on this segement, and it will glean for the right next-hop)
    Now you may observe that when you give a static route only pointing to an Ethernet interface,
    you LDP adjacency may come up and you may exchange the bindings with each other. But the Label Forarding Table is not created. This is bcos of this being a Multiaccess interface. And you have
    Glean For it. If its a Normal WAN interface like Serial or POS, then there is no problem of
    GLean and you would have a Valid Cached Adjacency.
    So to avoid probelems with Ethernet interfaces you can simply specify the next-hop-ip address.
    For Eg: ip route 10.10.31.250 255.255.255.255 10.10.31.226 (Without the Interface)
    ip route 10.10.31.250 255.255.255.255 fa0/0 10.10.31.226 (Or with the Interface)
    Only Difference in both is in the first one it has to do a recursive lookup for the outgoing interface. Otherwise both work well. And you can have static routes in your network
    running MPLS.
    And doing this CEF would would work as it should and you would have a Valid Cached Adjacency.
    So this is applicable for Cisco devices which use CEF, including 6500 with SUP720.
    HTH-Cheers,
    Swaroop

  • What is the Right Form of OSX 10.8 's Static Route Grammars

    I am not good at mac os code. so i have some questions about route grammar.
    eg:
    I need add a static route for a IP,
    just like:sudo route -nv add -net 10.0.0.0 192.168.42.254
    i input it in termina,then it worked. But when i restart mac. the route did not exist.
    so where is not right form about the "sudo route -nv add -net 10.0.0.0 192.168.42.254"?
    who can tell me more about How to add STATIC ROUTE in mac os? waiting on line.guys help me.

    Defining a persistent static route on Mac OS X - Server Fault
    Adding static routes to a network - Mac OS X Hints
    RouteSplit
    Setting a static route every boot with launchd - Ask Different

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem installing Adobe Photoshop CS3 Trial

    When installing the trial version of Adobe Photoshop CS3, I get an error message saying that there has been a "fatal error". What is the problem? I have re-downloaded the exe more than once, closed all programs, etc. Thanks for any help.

  • ITunes 8 + OS 10.5.7 NOT Compatible??

    There seems to be a pattern appearing here in the posts on numerous threads relating to iTunes 8 AND OS 10.5.7. Ever since I upgraded to iTunes 8.2 on my MacBookPro running OS 10.5.7, I can no longer play any of the movies or tv shows I downloaded be

  • Problem in mapping 1:M relationship

    I am using toplink+jpa in my application. I have a 1:M unidirectional relationship (without association table) in my application. I am not able to find correct annotations to define it. Kindly help. Following code works when I use JPA+Hibernate but d

  • Apache won't start after ColdFusion Install

    Any suggestions on what to look for, as to why Apache will not start after installing ColdFusion MX Dev Edition on a Win 2003 Server? Is there something in a log file I could look at? Any help is appreciated. Also, when I take the JRUN mod out of the

  • How does the verizon wifi work? Do you pay monthly?

    I want to buy the new iPad with retina display as a gift, but how does this verizon wifi work? Do you pay monthly or have to call Verizon?