Configuring the  Synchronous scenario in XI

Hello everyone!
I want to configure a "Synchronous" scenario wherein when XI sends a message to a Marketsite, it waits for a response, then send back the response to the SAP system.
My question is this, would I need to configure a "sender adapter" in order to pick up the response, or will the response fire back automatically as long as I have configured my message interfaces as "synchronous"?
What might I need to add in the Integration Directory in order to make the synchronous scenario work?
Warm regards,
Glenn

In this case you want a response back from file. This is not possible as file adapter does not support sync scenario.
If you use the adapter that supports sync scenario like RFC, SOAP etc, then you have to create interfaces as follows:
Outbound Synchronous interface for sender to XI
Inbound Synchronous for XI to receiver.
In each of the interface you have to specify the request and response message types.
if it helpful reward points are appreciated

Similar Messages

  • How to configure the following scenario?

    I have a following requirement:
    I am selling an equipment to a customer and the delivery has taken place in Jan 2008. However as per the requirement I can recognize the revenue only in after installation which will be in March 2008. However I will be invoicing the customer, but the revenue will be recognized only after completing the installation. This is supported by RR, but I would like to know how to configure? Appreciate your help.

    Hi,
    Your scenario is for service industry involving selling of equipments first followed by installation of the same and services later on. The installation of the equipment is the triggering point for recognising the revenue and not the sale of equipment. Looks like a typical telecom scenario.
    My suggestions are as below:
    1) if possible, discuss this with your finance business team and move away from this scenario of revenue recognition. This scenario takes more efforts and provides less benefits. You not only need to deferr the revenue but also the cost and SAP does not support 1 to 1 mapping of the invoice for deferring the cost. (As per the matching concept in accounting, revenue and cost should be mapped in proper buckets so that the accurate margins can be calculated). If the installed base is required for some statutory reporting, you can generate that seperately from SAP by maintaining the install base.
    I know this is very tough change management activity to make happen but this really has long term fruits attached to it as it simplifies your business processes.
    2) Try this on your sandbox system. Use revenue recognition type as B - Service related revenue recognition. Apply a deferred account in VKOA settings for your ERL key or the revenue account key you are using. Now create the order and process it through delivery and billing.  The accounting entry should post to deferred account. Run VF44 for the billing document and recognise the revenue.
    This process helps you in doing the recognitoin but the only catch here is that there is no triggering point. You need to control the running of VF44 manually by generating a seperate report which can tell you which billing document to recognize from deferred account and when. If you would like to have the installation date as triggering point, then you would have to modify the Standard SAP to have some user exits placed in the revenue recognition functionality to make it happen. This i would only suggest you if you have good hands on SAP revrec both functionaly and technicaly.
    I know that my answer is not going to give you a easy fix for your problem but that is the best way to go without making much of the changes to standard SAP. Feel free to contact me back in case of any questions at my email address [email protected]. If you can send me your phone number then we can have a small call where we can have more detailed discussions.
    Thanks
    Kapil Sharma

  • How to hard code the values in XI for the synchronous scenario?

    Hi All,
    Actual Scenario : Webservice - XI - Any of the Receiver Adapter(RFC/JDBC) .
    The receiver adapter setup will take some more days to complete. So, time being I would like to hard code the response values in XI according to the webservice request and send the response back to webservice. Is it possible?
    If it is possible, could you please tell me how to go about for this?
    Regards
    Sara

    Hey
    >>So, time being I would like to hard code the response values in XI according to the webservice request
    if ur response is based upon the request,then how can u hard code any value?when u hard code any element.it will always display the hard coded value irrespective of the request.
    in case u want to hard code something which does not depends on response or which will always stay the same in ur scenario,then just use the constant function of message mapping to do that
    thanx
    ahmad
    Message was edited by:
            Ahmad

  • FILE to SOAP synchronous scenario - config of SOAP channel

    Hi All,
    I have a scenario where I want PI to pull some files from 3rd party application.
    Adapters to be used: SOAP receiver, FILE adapters.
    I am aware of the use of Request/Response beans in File sender channel and the File receiver channel to dump the received files in a particular location.
    I need help with the configuration of the SOAP channel.
    The files to be pulled will be Encrypted.
    Summary:
    File sender(RequestResponse & ResponseOneWay Beans) , File receiver( to receive the files), SOAP receiver.
    Need help with the config of SOAP.
    Kindly let me know your views.
    Thanks,
    Pratibha.

    Hi,
    Let me put it in detail steps:
    In forward flow we will be sending an IDoc. It will be processed and later an Acknowledgement file will be generated.
    Now, we want to PULL this Ack file. If the other party had to push the Ack file, the scenario would have been simple.
    But, we want to poll for this file and then pull it.
    So, we would have something like this:
    1. FILE SENDER sends a sample file.
    2. We will be applying the beans in file sender to make it a synchronous scenario. So, the Ack file will be received at the location mentioned in the corresponding FILE RECEIVER adapter.
    3. We have a SOAP RECEIVER which should send the ACK file in response.
    I have configured the same scenario where the RECEIVER was HTTP adapter. The 3rd party had provided us the URL and ENT-APRF value. When I used to send the sample file via FILE SENDER to this HTTP receiver, I was able to retrieve the ACK file via the FILE RECEIVER.
    Now, I wish to configure the same using RECEIVER SOAP adapter.
    I need to know about the config at SOAP end i.e. how and where  the ACK file will be available at the SOAP end for the FILE sender to pull the file.
    Ack files will be encrypted..
    Any views/suggestions will be of great help.
    Thanks,
    Pratibha.

  • CCM2.0 Config in NW2004S (PI7.0) - Configuring a second scenario problem

    Hi,
    While trying to complete the CCM 2.0 configuration in our XI system I’ve reached a problem that I don’t know how to solve.
    I had originally configured the CatalogeUploadOnWAS700 scenario and now I’m trying to configure the MasterDataInclusionInCatalogeOnWAS700.
    As I’ve already defined and used the business system in the earlier definition, I’m not able to configure the ‘Configure Connections’ for the second scenario in the Configuration Steps. When I try to select the ‘check box’ the entry is not open for editing.
    Then if I leave that section and choose ‘Generate’, the communication channel isn’t created for the new scenario.
    What should I be doing differently?
    Regards,
    Jerry

    Hi Jerry,
    Rather than creating a new service button for the Business System add in the existing service you used in the Uplaod scenario. This should allow you to Configure the Connections.
    Regards
    Chris

  • IDOC Serialization & Synchronous Scenarios with AAE

    Hi Folks,
    I have queries reg Advanced Adapter Engine (AAE):
    1) Can we  do the Synchronous scenarios through AAE.
    2) How can i do the IDOC serialization. How AAE helps in that.
    Am using PI 7.3 ...Can you please mention the possibilites for the above queries.
    Thank you!!
    Regards,
    Sekhar

    MDM Learn wrote:
    Hi Folks,
    >
    > I have queries reg Advanced Adapter Engine (AAE):
    >
    > 1) Can we  do the Synchronous scenarios through AAE.
    Already supported as part of 7.1 / 7.11 so dont see any problem here
    >
    > 2) How can i do the IDOC serialization. How AAE helps in that.
    >
    > Am using PI 7.3 ...Can you please mention the possibilites for the above queries.
    >
    > Thank you!!
    >
    > Regards,
    > Sekhar
    the above should be very much supported if you are using the Java IDoc adapter. For serialization use qRFC in SAP partner profile

  • File to RFC synchronous scenario stopped Picking the files

    Hi Experts,
    We have a File to RFC synchronous scenario. Till yesterday night it is working fine.
    But suddenly it is stooped working.In moni, i can see the failed messages with the Mapping error " Can not create target element, values missing in the queue context "
    No Payload in moni / communication channel monitoring / Message monitoring. I've noticed that, wrong files placed in the To-be- processed files and the adapter picked those files and failed in mapping.
    I tried by stop and start the communication channel / did some dummy changes in the communication channel and activated. cleared the cache.
    But still the communication channel is not working.when i stop and start the communication channel it will try to process the wrong files and failed.
    Give me your valuable inputs to resolve this issue.
    Regards
    Bhargava krishna

    Hi Bharghav,
    Please go through the below,
    Symptom
    FTP Adapter is being used in the business scenario for message processing.
    During file processing it is noticed, that the FTP sender channel stops
    polling. There is no error in the channel monitor or the trace/log files
    and the polling jobs are correctly displayed in the AFW scheduler table.
    The issue is observed after a network connection issue with the FTP server.
    In order to remove the hanging locks from the FTP Adapter, the parameter
    'ftp.timeout' setting is required to be set, which releases the lock once
    the timeout value is expired. But in the above situation, the value for the
    'ftp.timeout' is not taken properly while establishing the data connection
    by File Adapter.
    Other terms
    FTP Adapter, sender, FTP, adapter, timeout, stalled, network, hang, polling
    Reason and Prerequisites
    Program error
    Solution
    The hanging situation has now been improved by code changes. Please see
    section "SP Patch Level" of this note for a list of updated software
    components.
    To get this correction available in your Support Package you need to apply
    the patch matching to your Support Package version as per the instructions
    in the NetWeaver Support Package Stack guide which can be found on the SAP
    Service Marketplace as described in SAP Note 952402.
    Thanks & Regards
    Uday.S

  • JDBC- RFC- JDBC Synchronous scenario (Can't see the response message)

    Hello Experts,
    I tried this step in creating a synchronous scenario by using steps found in this site -> [http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/File-RFC-File%28Without%20BPM%29|http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/File-RFC-File%28Without%20BPM%29] I just changes File to JDBC. But problem is I see the sent XML message in SXMB_MONI but to response message. I also can't see the Sender interface name for the response message when I tried to use F4 in the Interface Name portion.
    Do someone encountered this before? Please help
    Regards,
    Alfred

    Hello,
    I hope someone could guide me on how to set this up cause I only see the sent message but there's no response message in SXMB_MONI. Note that interface was successful, I just want to see what was sent by the response.
    Regards,
    Alfred

  • Message flow in SAP PI 7.31 JAVA only for ABAP Proxy synchronous scenario with Oracle DB

    Dear Experts,
    I am working on a synchronous scenario Sender ABAP Proxy <===> SAP PI 7.31 JAVA only <===> Oracle Database.I have successfully
    configured all the proxy configurations as well both Sender SOAP and JDBC receiver channels are showing no error when pinged from
    Cc monitoring in NWA.
    1.During testing at Tx SPROXY , I am triggering a message and after 5 minutes I receive an PARSING error message with 2 messages in ECC
    local IE i.e. Tx SXMB_MONI.
    Note : In NWA , I can see only 1 message that too in cancelled status.
    2.Seeing the trace of the messages I assume that the messages have not moved from sender ECC system. I am still confused with flow of message
    from the Message Audit log. Audit log of error messages.Could any one share the full Audit log of a successful message generated in SAP PI 7.31 JAVA only.
    3.I observed that the QIN Scheduler status in ECC is in INACTIVE status. There is no queue id for 2 messages generated in ECC. Does
    it should in ACTIVE status in Tx SMQR..
    Regards
    Rebecca

    Hi Thomas,
    Valuable inputs..
    1. Since I don't have any audit log for successful message, would you be able to share referring to the
    below screenshot whether the message was put into receiver JDBC adapter and JDBC adapter tried to retrieve the Select response from Oracle Database.
    2.I have done some setting in Advance mode of the receiver JDBC to increase the time out and other parameters as per SAP note but still the issue is same. If you perhaps have some experience in such scenarios, please share some input so that I can ask the Oracle Database administrator exactly what is required from our side.
    3.Regarding the slow response from Oracle , there was some suggestion that the datatype of the request and response should match the column name of the Oracle database. I did that.. Do you have any more suggestion that may be hampering the generation of the response message from the Oracle like SAP note or document.
    Regards
    Rebecca

  • No response message in Proxy to JDBC synchronous scenario

    Dear Team,
    I am working on synchronous scenario Sender ABAP proxy <===> SAP PI 7.31 <===> Oracle Database.All the necessary proxy configuration has been successfully tested.
    Business Scenario:
    ABAP proxy will send a single Vendor Id to Oracle DB as request and in return , it has to retrieve all the columns related to Vendor as response.Oracle Database stores all the Vendor information.There are 11 columns including the vendor Id in the view for the Vendor records.
    Design :
    For Request structure:
    a-->Created MT for Sender ABAP Proxy with only 1 field for Vendor Id.
    b-->Created MT for Receiver JDBC  with Action as SELECT , Table with "View Name" , Access with Constant Blank for all 11 column and Key as Vendor Id.
    I have been following  the link and Bhavesh Kantilal document.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73/helpdata/en/44/7b7171fde93673e10000000a114a6b/content.htm?frameset=/en/44/7b7855fde93673e10000000a114a6b/f
    rameset.htm&current_toc=/en/ca/b977f1c7814201954f20bb87ad7aab/plain.htm&node_id=71
    For Response structure:
    Created MT for Receiver JDBC with All the column names.
    Created MT for target ABAP ECC with the same 11 column name of JDBC response.
    Note :
    1.Database team shared a excel file as a sample payload which has all the column names of a vendor and I created my DT with the same naming conventions as they are maintaining in their database i.e. Column names are in CAPs, in the same order and even the special characters in the column name.
    2. The PING test connection for Cc works fine to database.
    Please read out my queries as the I am not receiving any response from Oracle DB and gives error as timeout exception:
    1.Since I am trying to retrieve all the column of the view , am I doing the correct procedure of putting all the column name in the JDBC request structure and making a Select statement. Can I add < * > to fetch all the column name and if so where can I add it.
    2. Whats the difference between SELECT and SQL_QUERY and on what circumstances I can add it?
    3. How can I test ICO in ID?
    4. Can I use any SOAP tool to test the messages? Is there any functionality in NWA to test the messages directly to JDBC .
    Hope all your inputs can improve my design part.
    Regards
    Rebecca

    Hi Rebecca,
    Did you go through all of these links below?
    PROXY to JDBC- SYNC
    Proxy to JDBC Sync, with Idoc Receiver
    JDBC to PROXY Sync Scenario | SCN
    JBDC Receiver Insert Statement Response
    Re: Synchronous JDBC select
    receiver JDBC structure
    Regards,
    Jannus Botha

  • SAP PI conceptual best practice for synchronous scenarios

    Hi,
    <br /><br />Apologies for the length of this post but I'm sure this is an area most of you have thought about in your journey with SAP PI.
    <br /><br />We have recently upgraded our SAP PI system from 7.0 to 7.1 and I'd like to document  best practice guidelines for our internal development team to follow.
    I'd be grateful for any feedback related to my thoughts below which may help to consolidate my knowledge to date.
    <br /><br />Prior to the upgrade we have implemented a number of synchronous and asynchronous scenarios using SAP PI as the hub at runtime using the Integration Directory configuration.
    No interfaces to date are exposes directly from our backend systems using transaction SOAMANAGER.
    <br /><br />Our asynchronous scenarios operate through the SAP PI hub at runtime which builds in resilience and harnesses the benefits of the queue-based approach.
    <br /><br />My queries relate to the implementation of synchronous scenarios where there is no mapping or routing requirement.  Perhaps it's best that I outline my experience/thoughts on the 3 options and summarise my queries/concerns that people may be able to advise upon afterwards.
    <br /><br />1) Use SAP PI Integration Directory.  I appreciate going through SAP PI at runtime is not necessary and adds latency to the process but the monitoring capability in transaction SXMB_MONI provide full access for audit purposes and we have implemented alerting running hourly so all process errors are raised and we handle accordingly.  In our SAP PI Production system we have a full record of sync messages recorded while these don't show in the backend system as we don't have propogation turned on.  When we first looked at this, the reduction in speed seemed to be outweighed by the quality of the monitoring/alerting given none of the processes are particularly intensive and don't require instant responses.  We have some inbound interfaces called by two sender systems so we have the overhead of maintaing the Integration Repository/Directory design/configuration twice for these systems but the nice thing is SXMB_MONI shows which system sent the message.  Extra work but seemingly for improved visibility of the process.  I'm not suggesting this is the correct long term approach but states where we are currently.
    <br /><br />2) Use the Advanced Adapter Engine.  I've heard mixed reviews about this functionaslity, there areh obvious improvements in speed by avoiding the ABAP stack on the SAP PI server at runtime, but some people have complained about the lack of SXMB_MONI support.  I don't know if this is still the case as we're at SAP PI 7.1 EHP1 but I plan to test and evaluate once Basis have set up the pre-requisite RFC etc. 
    <br /><br />3) Use the backend system's SOAP runtime and SOAMANAGER.  Using this option I can still model inbound interfaces in SAP PI but expose these using transaction SOAMANAGER in the backend ABAP system.  [I would have tested out the direct P2P connection option but our backend systems are still at Netweaver 7.0 and this option is not supported until 7.1 so that's out for now.]  The clear benefits of exposing the service directly from the backend system is obviously performance which in some of our planned processes would be desirable.  My understanding is that the logging/tracing options in SOAMANAGER have to be switched on while you investigate so there is no automatic recording of interface detail for retrospective review. 
    <br /><br />Queries:
    <br /><br />I have the feeling that there is no clear cut answer to which of the options you select from above but the decision should be based upon the requirements.
    <br /><br />I'm curious to understand SAPs intention with these options  -
    <br /><br />- For synchronous scenarios is it assumed that the client should always handle errors therefore the lack of monitoring should be less of a concern and option 3 desirable when no mapping/routing is required? 
    <br /><br />- Not only does option 3 offer the best performance, but the generated WSDL is ready once built for any further system to implement thereby offering the maximum benefit of SOA, therefore should we always use option 3 whenever possible?
    <br /><br />- Is it intended that the AAE runtime should be used when available but only for asynchronous scenarios or those requiring SAP PI functionality like mapping/routing otherwise customers should use option 3?  I accept there are some areas of functionality not yet supported with the AAE so that would be another factor.
    <br /><br />Thanks for any advice, it is much appreciated.
    <br /><br />Alan
    Edited by: Alan Cecchini on Aug 19, 2010 11:48 AM
    Edited by: Alan Cecchini on Aug 19, 2010 11:50 AM
    Edited by: Alan Cecchini on Aug 20, 2010 12:11 PM

    Hi Aaron,
    I was hoping for a better more concrete answer to my questions.
    I've had discussion with a number of experienced SAP developers and read many articles.
    There is no definitive paper that sets out the best approach here but I have gleaned the following key points:
    - Make interfaces asynchronous whenever possible to reduce system dependencies and improve the user experience (e.g. by eliminating wait times when they are not essential, such as by sending them an email with confirmation details rather than waiting for the server to respond)
    - It is the responsibility of the client to handle errors in synchronous scenarios hence monitoring lost through P-P services compared to the details information in transaction SXMB_MONI for PI services is not such a big issue.  You can always turn on monitoring in SOAMANAGER to trace errors if need be.
    - Choice of integration technique varies considerably by release level (for PI and Netweaver) so system landscape will be a significant factor.  For example, we have some systems on Netweaver 7.0 and other on 7.1.  As you need 7.1 for direction connection PI services we'd rather wait until all systems are at the higher level than have mixed usage in our landscape - it is already complex enough.
    - We've not tried the AAE option in a Production scenarios yet but this is only really important for high volume interfaces, something that is not a concern at the moment.  Obviously cumulative performance may be an issue in time so we plan to start looking at AAE soon.
    Hope these comments may be useful.
    Alan

  • Treatement of Fault Messages in Synchronous Scenarios?!

    Hi all,
    I got a question concerning the use of fault messages in
    synchronous scenarios...
    1. When I define a fault message for my synchronous   
       receiver interface, a fault message, coming back
       would  not be handled by my sync. Interface- and
       Messagemapping, right?
       So how can I give the fault messageinformation back to
       the sender?
    2. Will I have to define a second scenario for handling
       the fault message?
       (Meaning new Communication Channel, MI, IM, MM and so
       on)
       Thanks for help, anwers are quickly rewarded...
       Daniel

    > 1. When I define a fault message for my synchronous
    >   
    >    receiver interface, a fault message, coming back
    >    would  not be handled by my sync. Interface- and
    >    Messagemapping, right?
    > So how can I give the fault messageinformation
    > ion back to
    >    the sender?
    The fault message has to be handled in your BPM using an exception branch. You can create an exception branch in a block and assign it to be the handler for a particular exception(fault message).
    How can we handle Exception Branch in BPM effectively
    > 2. Will I have to define a second scenario for
    > handling
    >    the fault message?
    > (Meaning new Communication Channel, MI, IM, MM and
    > and so
    >    on)
    It depends on what you want to do with your fault message. If you want to throw an alert, that could trigger emails, you can do it by configuring alerts and using a control step in your exception branch to throw alerts. Only if you want to do something else like log a message into a database, you will need separate jdbc communication channel, MI etc.
    Regards,
    Suresh

  • How to configure the Http sender adapter

    Now i have look through the sap lib about the http sender adapter
    and i know the url is
    http://hostname:port/path?namespace=<...>
    &interface=<...>&service=<...>&cmd=T&loaderXML=< message object >&end=yes
    My questions are:
    1)the path in the URL is "/sap/xi/adapter_plain", if not, what is it?
    2)the message payload is right?
    any reply is appreciated
    Thank you very much

    Hi Leo,
    For a HHTP Scenario:
    DESIGN:
    1. Create DataTypes for source and Destinations. Create elements for all the text fields of your HTTP Client so that they can all be mapped into the destination file
    2. Create MessageTypes for the two datatypes.
    3. Create Message Interfaces. The One for HTTP is the sender, Asynchronous ( as no response is expected) and one for File is receiver, asynchronous.
    4. Do the mapping. It will be mostly a one to one mapping of the fields.
    5. Create the Interface Mapping.
    Configuration:
    1. Import your Business System under your Configuration Scenario.
    2. Create 2 communication channels. One for Http as a sender and one for your receiver say IDoc.
    Check these links for the configuration part.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/64db4daf9f30b4e10000000a11466f/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/bc/bb79d6061007419a081e58cbeaaf28/content.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/44/79973cc73af456e10000000a114084/content.htm
    3. Do the Receiver Agreement for Idoc. HTTP doesn’t need a sender agreement.
    4. DO the Receiver Determination and Interface Determination.
    Weblog which talk about the same scenario:-
    /people/sriram.vasudevan3/blog/2005/01/11/demonstrating-use-of-synchronous-asynchronous-bridge-to-integrate-synchronous-and-asynchronous-systems-using-ccbpm-in-sap-xi - although this weblog is
    aimed at explaining the sync-async bridge.. Sriram has taken http-to-file scenario as the example
    (use case) and explained it...
    Check this SDN tv demo, it has detail of HTTP adapter setup.
    https://media.sdn.sap.com/SDNTV/main.asp?mediaId=107
    Refer to this link for adapter settings.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/0d/5ab43b274a960de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
    You should also have a HTTP client to send message to XI. In the connecting parameters to XI u have to use the URL in the pattern mentioned . U have to give all the configuration details in the URL.
    If you give me your mail id or if you can mail me at [email protected], i can send you a HTTP CLIENT.....In which you need to view the source code and change the username and password to send message to XI.
    Regards,
    Abhy

  • IDOC to SOAP synchronous scenario

    Hi All,
    We have an IDOC to SOAP synchronous scenario in which IDOCs are sent to SOAP by calling a service and then SOAP sends a response back to XI . The response is not sent to SAP- R3. Please suggest on this
    Thanks

    Hello Rajesh,
    Thanks for your good justification.
    Here I have also replicated same kind of scenario and having same kind of issue.
    One thing just wanted to confirm - Even though SOAP adapter expects HTTP 200 response back from webservice, still SOAP channel is getting into red with following , and as we have Alert configured ...Alert mail also receiving as part of Error only. So How can we avoid that response ? Is there have any parameter to handle or suppress the response back?
    Thanks!
    Goutam

  • SOAP - XI- PROXY synchronous  scenario

    Hi Experts,
    I have a
    SOAP -
    XI -
    PROXY  Synchronous Scenario
    I have done the following things ESR and ID
    ESR:
    1. Created DT and respective MT for Request and Response.
    2. Created Service Interfaces with Synchronous mode with respective MT's.
    3. Created Two separate MM with respective Request and Response MT's.
    4. Created Operation Mapping and call both Request and Response Mappings in it.
    Integration Directory (ID):
    1. Configured considering Sender SOAP and Receiver ECC Services.
    2. Configured CC with required parameters in Sender SOAP CC and Receiver XI CC.
    3. Generate wsdl from Sender agreement and save it as a local file.
    I am getting error in receiver agreement. Do I need to specify any Module parameters in Module TAB for Sender CC or Receiver CC to synchronous scenario.
    Please hep me out.
    Thanks

    Hi Ram,
    I am getting error in receiver agreement. Do I need to specify any Module parameters in Module TAB for Sender CC or Receiver CC to synchronous scenario.
    It looks like you did not create a receiver agreement, or if you did, it did not match the interface that is given or configured in Interface Determination. Can you recheck your configuration?
    Regards,
    Mark

Maybe you are looking for