Confimation in status I1017

Hi to all,
we have a big problem during transferring a GR from SRM to R/3.
Many confirmations still remain in status I1017 even if they are correctly registrated into backend.
What we are expencting is the migration of GR from I1017 (Currently Being Transferred) to I1018 (Transmit to Backend System) status.
Does anyone know why the status does not change?
Thank you so much

Hi
Which SRM version are you using ?
Seems to be due to some SAP OSS note is missing in the SRM system.
Please go through the following SAP OSS notes ->
Note 906050 - Resubmit failed service confirmations
Note 338985 BBPCF & IV: incorrect IDocs in backend system
Note 537459 Confirmation cannot be reversed despite invoice quantity = 0
Note Note 877656 Leasing: posting a subsequent debit without invoice
807484 SRM40-SUS: Status 'Canceled' with ASN & order responses
803863 GT21: incorrect archive check on QUOT
647937 Improvements of cancellation function
522350 RHPROFL0: problems with generated profiles
625263 Deletion of EBP Invoices; Invoice status 'Held'
381434 Report RHPROFL0: Several users found->Profile loss
566193 Invoice release error during COA cancelation process
511513 EBP 3.5, SP 1, history: Corrections for enhanced display
Note 402498 Rejected confirmations in the shopping cart history
Note 386809 Invoice history for the lean PO
Hope this will help.
Regards
- Atul

Similar Messages

Possible to display more statuses in the PO search screen?

Hello,
When you search for purchase orders, you can select between many statuses.
You can search for orders in status "outstanding confirmations" by selecting this status in the dropdown and you will get all POs that are in this status in a list.
Problem/question is, the status shown pr order in the status column is "ordered" and not "outstanding confirmations". This goes for other statuses as well
Question is why it is working this way, and if it is possible to do anything with this?
rgds
GAR

Hi
Looks like a bug in the system.. Which SRM version are you using ?
Please see some other related SAP OSS Notes ->
Note 827638 - Populate possible statuses for PO correctly in extraction
Note 940159 - Deleted Purchase Order has wrong status
Note 824410 - Change PO extractor to populate correct status
Note 870584 - Implementation of note 782729 fails.
Re: Confimation in status I1017
Note 890812 - Inbound EDI message ORDRSP: Cancelling a purchase order item
Note 995086 - PO Confirmation is Sent as Rejected
Note 562226 - SRM-SUS: PO rejected for SUS MM
Note 411601 - Deleted confirmation displayed incorrectly in purch.order
Hope this will help. Do let me know in next reply.
Incase this does not help, also raise a Customer OSS message with SAP as well.
Regards
- Atul

Service Cofirmation not replicated in Backend system

Hi All,
When we are confirming service good in the SRM browser it is not being replicated in R/3, WS10400010 is being triggered and completed successfully but the data is not replicated in R/3.
I have checked the successful one and it has system status I1017,I1018 but the one which failed to replicate in R/3 has no statuses I1017 and I1018.
Can any one let me know what is the actual problem and what needs to be checked in R/3 whether the data is flowing or not.
Its urgent and every reply is hoghly appreciated.
Regards,
Ravi G

Hi Ravi,
Check in SLG1 & RZ20 (Application Monitors) for any error logs and detailed error description.
Check whether the programme BBP_GET_STATUS_2 is running properly in the back groung or not in the back ground.
In case the IDOC is getting failed check for the reason for failure of the IDOC in back end R/3 using WE05 / WE02 txn.
Please make the desired changes as per the IDOC failure message and reprocess the IDOC.
Hope this will make you clear about the issue. Clarifications are welcome.
Do update us for further help.
Award points for helpful answers.
Rgds,
Teja

Current repair at Apple

My MBPro is currently being repaired with AppleCare. I called to get an update on when it would be returned and they told me that they couldn't give me a date of when it would be completed. They said they need to locate a logic board for my laptop. They said it was a later model so it is not a very common part. Does anyone know what I can do to get a definate answer? The person I spoke with said that if I don't have it back within a time period, they send out a new computer. Does anyone know how long that is?

I just got off the phone and am in the same situation waiting for a logic board. :/
This is the first time sending in my MBP in for repair and when I called last Wednesday
the rep I got was very helpful and even called down to dispatch which in turn they said they
had my computer open and ready to install my logic board!
Called for an update today since my status online has never changed from the date they
received it ("on hold- part on order"). This applecare rep didn't sound as helpful and I felt like
she just gave me a quick reply and couldn't tell me anything other than what I already saw on the site.
Now debating if I should call a little later to get another rep just to confim my status (being impatient "I know").

BPM Status "In Process" - Message reached ECC successfully ??!!!

Hi,
I need help to resolve one issue which we are facing : (this is kinda strange)
==========================================================================
We are using a BPM in one of our scenario where acknowledgements are sent in and out from PI to ECC. The BPM is relatively complex.
The issue we are facing is : -
The BPM shows status "In Process" but the messages have reached ECC and the functional team has confirmed the receipt of the message. All the tables / databases are updated as desired. We were yet to receive the response from ECC but strangely the BPM is not completed but the message has moved out of PI to ECC and updated the tables!!
My question is : - How come the messages reached ECC even though it showed that the BPM is not completed?
==========================================================================
Action points which I have taken : -
1.) I have digged in sxmb_moni_bpe and went through the messages in the payload couldn't find anything there which could have answered my question.
2.) Matched the data and went through all the message flow comparing the time stamp - didnt find much here too!
3.) The graphical message flow shows "Response from ECC" - in Wait state and a white block but still the messages got updated. Found it really strange!! .. If the BPM does not get completed, the messages should not move out!!
============================================================================
workaround :-
1.) I thought of putting a wait step and an exception that if the messages do not reach PI within the stipulated time, it will throw and error in PI. But still the question needs to be answered as to "How come the messages reached ECC even though it showed that the BPM is not completed?"
Kindly suggest.

I didnt find anything much there .. and moreover it is a Production system where we faced the issue so anyway I did nt have access to it. We have confimed from ECC functional team on the same and have logically deleted the process from PI.
Thanks anyway!

How to clear status "Error in process"?

Hi All,
I need help to clear the status of my invoice in SRM. The invoice status is "error in process". We checked in backend and reprocessed the IDOC through WE19 instead of BD87 and the invoices are posted now in backend. But the status of the invoices still shows "error in process" in SRM. I do understand that we should not use WE19 and should have processed it through BD87.
I checked in SRM and the enteries exists in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB table for these invoices, just tried to run CLEAN_REQREQ_UP and BBP_GET_STATUS_2 but no help.
Please help
Thanks, Sachin

please read all below
An IDoc BBPIV is sent if an invoice is released in the BBP system.In the invoice the statuses I1022 "Release granted" and I1017 "In transfer" are set.In addition, for the background job (see below) an entry is written to table BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB.
Unless I1017 is not set again to inactive, all previous operations are not allowed (in particular all changes to the invoice), that is, they are stopped by the program. The sending of the IDOC is checked by the background job CLEAN_REQREQ_UP. The report reads the BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB and makes a RFC (remote function call) per META_GOODSMVT_UPDATECHECK to check the posting of inbound IDocs.If the IDoc is posted successfully (status 53), the BBP invoice receives status I1018 "Transferred to backend".In addition, the entry is deleted in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB.
If the IDoc is posted incorrectly (status 51, no follow-on document), the status of the invoice is set to I1019 "Transfer failed".The entry in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB remains as is, that is, the status of the IDOCs in the backend system is still checked by the background job.The sending of the IDOC is checked by the background job CLEAN_REQREQ_UP.If the IDoc has not (yet) arrived in the backend system, the entry also remains as is.
Status I1018 allows to reverse the invoice in the future. In case of status I1019, a deletion is (again) possible.
The following must be considered when processing an incorrect IDoc in the backend system:
a) Further process the same IDoc (BD87), instead of copying and correct the IDoc with Transaction WE19 since in the latter case, the background job cannot find the (copied) IDoc and the invoice posted from that. In this case the BBP invoice would remain endlessly in status "incorrect", the entry in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB would never be deleted and the background job would always make the RFC at every run.In addition the BBP invoice would never receive the status "paid" (see below).
b) If the IDoc cannot be corrected or the error in the backend system cannot be solved, the IDoc remains in status "incorrect".In this case the BBP invoice should be deleted and the entry in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB should be deleted manually or with a self-written report.
Additional information: As of EBP Release 4.0 or after the implementation of Note 601470 or the import of the relevant Support Package, the entry in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB is deleted by the program (during the deletion of the invoice). Then the manual deletion is no longer required.
The following section does not correspondingly apply to the confirmation, but only applies to the invoice.
Status I1020 "paid" is set in the invoice by using the second background job BBP_IV_UPDATE_PAYMENT_STATUS to check the payment status of the follow-on invoice in the FI backend system for all invoices from the selection area.This only occurs for BBP invoices with status I1018 "Transfer to backend". To read the FI documents, META_FI_DOCUMENT_READ_40B is used.

SRM Invoice Status

Hi,
I have one question about Invoice status.
Can you please Provide the status. How we can see that which is the active status in Invoice. How we can identify the active status in Invoice. What is the meaning of X in SAP.
Invoice Number XXXX .
status.
I1017          Currently Being Transferred
I1021          Created
I1022          Approved
I1038          Complete
I1047          Created
I1052          Currently In Release Process   X
Invoice Number XXXX
status.
I1009          Held
I1021          Created
I1038          Complete
Or please give me some explanation about Invoice status in SAP SRM.
Regards.
Nishant

Hi Nishant,
The first invoice is Not in "Currently in Release Process" . If you looking for status then X means it is not in that status(Ex: in the first invoice Currently In Release Process   X means it is not in this status and it is being transfered.
Second one is "Held" ( it is not yet posted)
Rg,Sameer

Production order change status report

Dear All,
I created production order in PP. suppose I make changes in production order while confirmation i.e. i change prodn. order qty. 50 to 40 at stage 30(i.e. atrouting stage-- 3rd operation). From where i will get the status of this changes in production order qty ?
I tried in TC: COOIS , but it shows changed qty. 40. I want the diff. 50 -40 = 10 which i have cancelled whilw prodn.confimation.
Pl' reply....

we r using strategy '30'. we can not use make to order strategy as our planning has flexibility. So we r creating production orders manually@ 8000 materials from excel to SAP (using BDC program). So there is no linking with sales orders and production orders.
we r uploading material and qty. in mass to create prodn. orders manually.
while prodn. orders confirmation of new plan , sometimes to accomodate spill (pending orders--incomplete orders of last month) we have to cancel some new prodn. orders.
So how to cancel those and from which report i will get change qty. status?
thanks.

Confirmations at status 'Currently Being Transferred'

Hi All,
Has anyone come across any problems with the confirmation status not getting updated?
We are using SRM SERVER 5.5 on SP04. Extended Classic Scenario.
The confirmation is correctly created in EBP and is transferred correctly to ECC. Material document created and visible in ECC and IDOC at status 53.
The entries are not being removed from table bbp_document_tab and the status remains at 'Currently Being Transferred' (I1017).
This is preventing any goods returns being done.
Clean_ReqReq_Up and BBP_GET_STATUS_2 are runnign correctly.
Any help greatfully appreciated.
Cheers
Chris

Hi
Please go through the following SAP OSS Notes, which definitely will help.

Note 906050 Resubmit failed service confirmations
Note 535765 Too many entries in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB
Note 890481 Cleaner job: Do not delete processed entries
Note 623457 Incorrect entries in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB
Note 728510 Application monitors: Deleting items
Note 901840 list 'Error in transmission' shows 'approved', 'Transferred'
Note 338985 BBPCF & IV: incorrect IDocs in backend system
Note 537459 Confirmation cannot be reversed despite invoice quantity = 0
Note 306235 BBP: Transfer Confirmation --> Service Entry Sheet

Also, raise a Customer OSS message with SAP as well.
Do update me as well.
Regards
- Atul

First operation confimed - after system allowed changed order qty

Hi,
Production order first operation confimed - after user go change the produciton order qty, how to control this one, we need to config once first operation confirmed can't change the order qty. pls advise
ex : when create production order 10001234 qty 100 pcs, has oper 10,20,30,40
shop floor confirmed operation 10th 100pcs, after user change the qty 200 pcs, how to control this issue? pls
Thanks,
Sankaran

Hi Muthu
No need of exits , this can be done using status profile.
1>Create status profile using BS02.
2>give status no 10 as initial & 20 as the next .
3> in lowest & highest for 10 give as lowest 10 & highest 20 . For status 20 give lowest & hightst both as 20.
4> double click on status 10 & click on create & set what all business transactions u want to allow when the status is 10.
5> double click on 20 & tick on the radio button set against the partial confirmation button so that when the order is partially confirmed the status is automatically set to 20. in this status do not allow change prod order business transaction.
This should solve ur problem . Explore more about status profile in spro>production>SFC> order>create status profile documentation.
Thanks & regards
Prasad
Reward if useful.

Inconsistency of order header and operation status

Hi guru.
I did final confirmation of the production order.
This production order has one operation.
So..the operation status was changed to 'CNF MILE REL'.
But Order header status was not changed to 'CNF DLV'.
It's status was still 'REL MSPT PRC GMPS SETC'.
I did final confrimation again with 0 qty.
So it was changed to 'CNF DLV'.
But i want to know why first 'final confirmation' could not change the order header status.
Please help me.
Thanks.

Dear Jong,
1) CNF and DLV are two different status
2) If Auto GR is not maintained then you only get status CNF after doing final confirmation in CO11N or in CO15
3) So in your case i guess after doing final confimation you checked the status and found CNF but not DLV
4) after user doing GR in MB31 or in MIGO you might have got status DLV, and mean while again you might have
done final confirmation with zero qty and seeing both status CNF and DLV
Regards
Madhu

Issue relating to pick status

hi,
when i try to create a delivery through vl01n in the picking tab -the field over all pick status shows not relevant for pick i have checked tcode 0vlp relevant for picking is checked still the status shows not relevant for pick-pls guide

HI
If your plant is WM managed and, Picking has been done using Transfer order and same confimed then Over all piciking status will be completed or else your item many not be relevant for picking .
Regards,
Ram.

Confirmation with status "Currently Being Transferred"

Hi ,
we have implemented classic scenarion and for one confirmation , the backend service entry sheet isn't created .
How can i push this to create service entry sheet in backend. i have tried "bbp_pd_conf_transfer " but it did not help.
from bbp_pd i can see the the header status as "HEADER I1017 Currently Being Transferred".
Thanks and Regards
Iftekhar Alam

Hello Iftekhar Alam
Check whether the Idoc is created or not , to check this goto WE02 .
If the Idoc is created in SRM then you can see the same Idoc in the backend(R/3).
If the Idoc is not transfered from SRM then you can know the error in the status section of the Idoc.
If the Idoc is transfered from SRM and the Idoc is not posted in R/3 then the problem might be in R/3 and you can see the error in status section of the Idoc.
Please let us know what is the status and the errors information and will try to solve your issue.
Regards,
mani

Production order status - Finally Confirmed

Dear Team,
I would like to know the date on which the production order has got the status 'Confimed' (no more confirmations are possible on this order). In which table the final confirmation (last confirmation for this order) date is stored?
Also i would like to know for a given production order, weather goods movement is allowed or not? In which table this info is stored?
your input required
regards
psk
Edited by: psk.psg on Jan 18, 2012 11:22 AM

HI PSK
All confirmations of production orders are stored in table AFRU - details fields are - AUFNR- order no, BUDAT- posting date, RUECK- confirmation no & all activities etc.
Goods movement allowed or not is controlled through order status ( say if the order is not released it wont be allowed) , further if the order is locked no goods movmt, then if the orders are TECO goods movment may be allowed or not depending on config setting. If order status is business completed no movment alloed
shakti

User status profile settings on WBS not working

Hello,
We have a User status profile on WBS element which has various statuses in it allowing different business transactions when that particular user status is set.
There is one user status NPC in that status profile which should disallow assignment or confirmation on maintenance work order. Now the status previous to NPC status allows assignment or confirmation of orders. So after a order is assigned to the WBS and the WBS user status is changed to NPC when we try to confirm order on this WBS in NPC status sytem allows order confirmation.
Why is system allowing this inspite of the status profile config says confirmation is disallowed in NPC status. I have checked the object types in the status profile config and maintenance order is also included in that but still its not working. Please help in solving this issue, its critical.

The business transactions disallowed under NPC status are as below,
Acct. Assignment order/Project
Actual activity Allocation
Assignment Order/WBS
Confirm Order
Goods Movement
Material Purchase Order
Material Purchase Requisition
Post Goods Issue
But orders can be assigned in the status before NPC, but once NPC is set system does not allow assignment of new orders which is correct. But system allows confirmation of already assigned orders. Please help we do not want any order confimation after NPC is set.

Confimation in status I1017

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for