Confirmatin
Dear gurus,
i am creating production order through CO07 for rework order
when i am doing co11n systemm is throwing error
For document type SA, an entry is required in field Doc. Hdr Text
when i am creating order with co01 for original order every thing is fin
why this error is coming ?please help me out.
siva
While you wait for Mr. Bramhankar's inputs here is something you can do.
In OBA7 for document type SA, the field Document header text would be flagged. So discuss with your FI-Co person if it is required, if not then uncheck the same & proceed. But if in case it is required, find out how you can maintain this document header text.
Maybe you can check with your FI-Co person whether you can change the document type from SA to some other in OKOA for the settlement profile used in your order.
Similar Messages
-
Mass deletion of Forecast & Backlog Confirmatin from APO
Hello All,
Is there any transaction to delete the backlog Forecast & Confirmation from APO. Can MC75 transaciton in R/3 delete the Forecast from APO in mass. In current senario I am doing manual deletion of backlog Confirmation every month. Can any transaciton help me in same ??
Thanks in advanceHi Mohit,
You can use TCode- /sapapo//rlcdel, which is the same as the report in SE38- /sapapo/rlcdelete. chose 'select object by categories'. Put the order category as F*, put the date range, planning version, product and location and execute. This will delete the forecasts for the particular product/loc.
-Manotosh -
In MIGO against Scheduling agreement for Consignment error
Dear SAP Gurus,
I m getting abn error in MIGO for SA
"Maintain pricing conditions for the material for the excise invoice date"
vinod>
GSMY Volvo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We want to receive material against delivery schedules of Scheduling agreement.
>
> Our setting are.
> No MRP
> Delivery schedules are created manually.
> No confirmatin control.
>
> Issue is, delivery schedules are future date but i want to make MIGO today without changing the delivery schedules in ME38.
> Is it standard SAP setting that we will not be able to receive the material for future dates ? or is there some setting in background ?
>
> Sundar
Its standard SAP setting that migo cannot be done with delivery in future dates. To do migo, change the delivery schedule to today's date and then do the GR against the SA. -
Purchase order history not displayed in correct sequence
Hi all,
We are on SRM 7.1 ECS.
The issue we are facing is that the follow on documents for the PO i.e.
confirmatin and Invoice are not displayed in the correct sequence i.e. the sequence in which the documents are displayed is :
Invoice>confirmation>shopping cart-->PO
Any idea if this is a std feature or a bug?Hi
Pl find the content of the notes.
Note 1524928 - History: Order of related document is not consistent.
Symptom
In some cases, when you go to the shopping cart item history, the system displays follow-on documents in a wrong order.
Other terms
History.
Reason and Prerequisites
Program Error.
Solution
Implement the attached correction instructions or apply the relevant Support Package.
If the note is not released , pl raise a OSS to get this note released.
Regards
velu -
I am currently taking all deliveries of type NL and NLCC and creating an outbound IDOC of type DESADV. I am then converting this IDOC into an inbound IDOC of type ORDRSP and updating the confirmations tab of the PO. Here is my issue, iIf a user reverses the delivery running VL09 I need a way to either remove the entry on the confirmatins tab or to update the quantity to zero. I was thinking about adding an enhancement to the end of VL09 so that when all deliveries of type NL and NLCC are reversed I either remove the confirmation or update the quantity to zero. Do the experts have any ideas how to resolve my issue?
Hi kona,
Tax is calculated based on the tax procedure.
Here we use TAXINJ procedure.
Moreover tax is not calculated based on the std pricing procedure, it is picked from the tax code only.
As u said even if I maintain freight condition type above the tax condition types in std pricing procedure, tax wont get calculated since as i said tax is calculated from tax code.
Tax code is based on TAXINJ procedure.
In PO if u goto Invoice tab and click taxes, over ther tax is calculated based on tax code.
If u try it u too will understand the complications.
regards,
vimal -
Hi
Please tell me all the tables used in Project system
for
Plan Cost
Actual Cost
Network Related data
Confirmatin
Scheduling data
And others
Thanks in advance
Please these are very urgent
Thanks & Regards
Rama Shanker sharm a
Edited by: Rama Shanker Sharma on Aug 13, 2008 12:10 PMHi,
Refer this blog for tables
SAP Project System - A ready Reference ( Part 2 )
Regards, -
CORUAWFP "An application for posting goods movements is already active"
Hi Experts,
We have a strange message- we don't get it why this happnes so often.
In our system, production order confirmatins are done vai BAPI (BAPI_PRODORDCONF_CREATE_TT) and we are executing CO1P (CORUAWFP) every 10 minutes in order to avoid "Intended Goods Movements (GRs are suspendded, because of Lock sutuation)" .
The problem is when CO1P(CORUAWFP)) is kicked, sometimes a strange message is displayed ,"An application for posting goods movements is already active" , and the job ends abnormaly. We are sure we don't run CO1P (CORUAWFP) in parallel.
Why this situation happnens?
Thanks in advance.
Best Refards,
/Hiro Okamoto
Edited by: Hiro Okamoto on Aug 27, 2011 5:36 PM
Edited by: Hiro Okamoto on Aug 27, 2011 5:37 PM
Edited by: Hiro Okamoto on Aug 27, 2011 5:37 PMThe message simply means there are 2 or more programs being executed simultaneously accessing the same set of data & hence a locking occurs or the table lock is not getting released within time so that the next program can get a lock.
Get in touch with your system admin & ask them to monitor & let you know which programs are locking. Once you have that info, you can then change the schedule of the programs to prevent locking. -
Batch is not getting determined
Hi,
We are facing a serious issue while we create a TO from a Project delivery, batch is not getting determined so automatic confirmatin is also not happening. Please note that we are using Leanwarehouse and the movement type 281 and the special stock is Q. We have also maintained entries in VHC1 batch search strategy.
Please help me in resolving the issue and let me know in case i need to maintain more settings
Warm Regards,
Sridhar bI think the problem is the stock catagory.
"Q" or "S" material is not meant to be picked for out bound delivery, mvmnt type must be specific for Q stock
try lt03 manual t.o. creation in the forground (entering the source info of the q stock) for the delivery I would expect to see a source bin error "no available stock in bin"
meaning that SAP does not see "Q" material as available for picking
Edited by: Arakish on Mar 24, 2010 5:39 PM -
Dear Experts,
I want to do MAKE TO ORDER for production (Discrete). So can you please give me the complete cycle for MTO from SD, MM, PP & FICO involment in the cycle.
Thanks & Regards,
venkat.Hi,
Please find below Make to Order Cycle.
1. Creation of Sales Order - VA01
2. MRP against Sales ORder - MD50
3. Convert the planned order into Production / Process ORder
4. Preliminary Cost Estimate for ORder
5. Release the Order
6. Conversion of Purchase requisition into Purchase Order
7. Creation of Purchase Order - ME21N
8. Goods Receipt against Purchase ORder - MIGO
Accounting Entry: Rawmaterial A/c dr
To Goods Receipt/IR
9. Confirmatin of ORder - COR6N
10. Order Report - KKBC_ORD
11. Goods Receipt for Order - MB31
Accounting Entry: Finished Goods a/c dr
To Production Order
12. Order Report KKBC_ORD
13. Stock Overview Report - MMBE
14. Outbound Delivery PGI - VLO1N
Accounting Entry: Finished Goods COS a/c dr
To Finished Goods
15. Billing - VF01
Accounting Entry: Customer A/c dr
To Sales Revenue
Period End Activities
16. Overhead Calculation - KGI2
17. When Order Technically completed:
Variance Calculation for ORder - KKS2
18. Settlement of Variance - KO88
Accounting Entry: Finished Prod PV
To Production Order SEt
Regards,
Durga -
Hi,
The supplier wants to post a partial confirmation againt a PO. The PO_ITEMUNDERDELIVERY is inactive but still the system is giving error message "Confirmatin defers from request".
Request to please suggest?
thanks,
karthick.
Edited by: karthigemini on Jun 21, 2011 2:34 PMHi,
Sorry for the typo mistake you need to maintain below validation setting:
Hi,
You need to maintain below validation settings.
Go to SPRO>Supply Network Collaboration>Basic Settings>Validation>Own Settings-->Maintain Settings in Validation Profiles
Maintained below setting:
Vali.prof=POC3
Validation check=PO_ITMUNDERDELIVERY
Check status=Active
Msgtype=W
Save Mode=Save message as Valid
Continuation Mode=Continue checks
Vali.prof=POC5
Validation check=PO_ITMUNDERDELIVERY
Check status=Active
Msgtype=W
Save Mode=Save message as Valid
Continuation Mode=Continue checks
Vali.prof=POC3
Validation check=PO_ITMUNDERDELIVERY_WITHOUTZERO
Check status=Active
Msgtype=W
Save Mode=Save message as Valid
Continuation Mode=Continue checks
Vali.prof=POC5
Validation check=PO_ITMUNDERDELIVERY_WITHOUTZERO
Check status=Active
Msgtype=W
Save Mode=Save message as Valid
Continuation Mode=Continue checks
save this setting.
Regards,
Nikhil -
I have run into a scenario where the quantity in the IDOC is less than the quantity on the PO. The IDOC fails becuase there is a quantity variance. Does anyone know if I can get the IDOC to process so the confirmatins tab of the PO has the value that is on the IDOC?
Check a couple of things. This error is an SQL error related to very complex select statements. But your dump says that is happened when tyring to LOAD. So there is something corrupted.
Go to SE38, enter the program name SAPLEINM and generate. Did you recently upgrade? Did you write any user exits in there?
I didn't find any notes with this error. -
MIGO against Scheduling agreement.
Hello,
We want to receive material against delivery schedules of Scheduling agreement.
Our setting are.
No MRP
Delivery schedules are created manually.
No confirmatin control.
Issue is, delivery schedules are future date but i want to make MIGO today without changing the delivery schedules in ME38.
Is it standard SAP setting that we will not be able to receive the material for future dates ? or is there some setting in background ?
Sundar>
GSMY Volvo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We want to receive material against delivery schedules of Scheduling agreement.
>
> Our setting are.
> No MRP
> Delivery schedules are created manually.
> No confirmatin control.
>
> Issue is, delivery schedules are future date but i want to make MIGO today without changing the delivery schedules in ME38.
> Is it standard SAP setting that we will not be able to receive the material for future dates ? or is there some setting in background ?
>
> Sundar
Its standard SAP setting that migo cannot be done with delivery in future dates. To do migo, change the delivery schedule to today's date and then do the GR against the SA. -
How to cancel the TO confirmation
Dear All
Is there any way to cacel or reverse the TO confirmaiton...?
ThanksThis topic has been discussed here several times...
As it was told you inprevious message you cannot cancel confirmatin of the TO.
You can cancel the TO if it is not confirmed in LT15.
You can reverse delivery related TO (by creating new TO) in LT0G in certain cases (e.g. you cannot do it if stock determination group is defined for the material)
Regards,
Csaba -
Mac App Store won't accept my password
Ok, well I sent tech support an email about this yesterday and never heard back, so I guess I'll give this a go...
The main problem is I can't access my account in the Mac app store. Everytime I enter my password its says "unkown error occured".
I did change my password yesterday before this problem arose, I don't know if that has anything to do with it or not, but the new password works in iTunes...Forgot to mention - iCloud login in System Preferences works fine with the new password, further confirmatin that the password has definitely been changed.
-
ITunes Store and App Store password suddenly 'incorrect' ?
Hi all,
I switched my TV onto the Apple TV tonight to watch a TV episode and found that my Mac Mini server wasn't showing up. iTunes is running but when I turned off Home Sharing and turned it back on, my Apple ID password wasn't accepted. The password didn't work in the Mac App Store either.
At that point, the same password worked fine on the Apple Support Communities.
I reset my password and logged back into the Apple Support Communities - all worked OK (old password didn't work, so it's definitely changed).
Still iTunes and the Mac App Store won't accept my password.
What's going on? Anyone else having this problem?Forgot to mention - iCloud login in System Preferences works fine with the new password, further confirmatin that the password has definitely been changed.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Ever since I have upgraded my phone to a 4s, with the new iOS6, and now even with the iOS 6.1 that I updated with this am, I am STILL getting the message "unable to join network" at home. I only have 2 GB of data usage between my partner and I, and
-
Today, when I plug my iphone in to charge, it won't charge. Why??
As of today, when I plugged in my iPhone in to charge, it won't charge. I get the little beep sound as I usually do when plugging my phone in, but the battery level display stays at red even when plugged in all day. Have checked other powerpoints, ot
-
i have made some java files in java project but when i compile the files it gives me error " error 300 : classes are not found " <<should the classes be created automatically or i have to create them>> i will post more info if necessary
-
Phone number not showing up in Imessage
I use to be able to send receive messages with my Ipad using my phone number instead of my email. Now the phone number isn't even listed anymore. Everything on my Iphone is fine. All my id's are listed on that device. I have done a hard reset on both
-
Get multiple values into one field
I want to get following two rows into one record. Thank you in advance! ID Name Category 109 John C1 109 John D8 Result: ID Name Category 109 John C1, D8