Confirmation of operation in MO

Dear PM Guys,
During confirmation of operation through IW41 or IW42,my client wants the time
like lunch,tea,shift change also to me entered for a particular operation.
My suggestion is enter the correct time spent for work in ACTUAL WORK and enter the time taken from start to end in ACTUAL DURATION(ACTUAL WORK+TIME SPENT DUE TO LUNCH,TEA ETC).
Eg operation-1 Actual Work=30 hours
Actual duration=34 hours
(4hours for lunch,tea,change of shift etc)
Is it correct or any other Good Option is there.
Moreover in the same screen(IW41or IW42),if I enter Work starts on and Work Ends on fields why the total hours between this is not automatically appearing in the Actual Duration field.
Pl guide me.
Regards
ISWARI

hi iswari
for achieving this you should set the scheduling parameters as Scheduling with breaks in IMG menu and while creating the capacity for workcenter you have to specify the breaks .then the order will be scheduled with breaks
in SAP while confirmation you have to enter the duration ,system will not calculate the duration based on the time specified .IF anyone has other options please guide us
regards
thyagarajan

Similar Messages

Error in TCode S_ALR_87013431 "Confirmation Using Operation List" selection

Hello Experts,
I think I have encountered an error in the functionality of the S_ALR_87013431 "Confirmation Using Operation List" in ECC 6.0.
When I select the "collective time confirmation" checkbox, the intended functionality is (form the transaction help) "If you select this field, the report program enters the selection result directly in the collective entry screen, without previously displaying a list of results from which you can reselect."
However, if I check the box, the results still don't appear directly in the collective entry screen, but still as a list of results.
Is there some configuration missing? Have you encountered a similar error?
Thanks!
Andreas

hi
i think there is some problem with the transaction ,in easy access menu it is displayed as S_ALR_87013431 confirmation with operation selection.
i think same screen it has incorporated
you can use IW48 which fullfil your requirement
regards
thyagarajan

UIX Tip - maybe of use to somebody - confirm Delete operation with Javascript popup

It was easier than I thought it would be to convert my Javascript Delete Confirmation message that I had developed for my JSP over to UIX:
By default UIX would generally do something along the lines of:
<submitButton text="Delete" ctrl:event="delete" />
which generates the following html:
<a href="# onclick="submitForm('viewForm',1,{'event':'delete');return false">
If you want to popup a Javascript window asking the user to confirm the operation you can do:
<submitButton text="Delete" ctrl:event="delete">
<boundAttribute name="onClick">
<fixed javaType="string">javascript:if (confirm("WARNING: You will not be able to revert this operation. This operation will also fail if there are dependant objects!")){return true;}else{return false;}</fixed>
</boundAttribute>
</submitButton>
this will generate the following html:
<a href="#" onclick="return _chain('javascript:if (confirm("WARNING: You will not be able to revert this operation. This operation will also fail if there are dependant objects!")){return true;}else{return false;}','submitForm(\'viewForm\',1,{\'event\':\'delete\'});return false',this,event,true)">
Matt.

This is a totally supported technique, and a good one.
To pick at nits, you don't need to start "onClick" handlers with "javascript:". Save yourself a whopping
11 bytes by trimming that off. With a bit of slyness, you could boil this down to:
<boundAttribute name="onClick">
<fixed javaType="string">return confirm("WARNING: You will not be able to revert this operation. This
operation will also fail if there are dependant objects!");</fixed>
</boundAttribute>... or, just extract that into a script, like:
<script><contents>function makeSure()
return confirm("WARNING: You will not be able to revert this operation. This operation will also fail
if there are dependant objects!");
}</contents></script>
<submit text="Delete" ctrl:event="delete" onClick="return makeSure()"/>

Can not confirm the operation because of Status inconsistency?

Hi Gurus,
             I have error message BS013, System Status is active for Operation.
             The Opeartion status in CTRD and REL (both are active) the workorder is REL.
             When I am trying to confirm the operation through IW41, I get the error message BS013.
              When I search the SAP notes I got the note 638826, but it is already implemented in my workpackage 4.7.
             There is no other note I can find.
             kindly help.
With regards,
Narendra

Hi
Pls check the standard system status maintained in the BS22, in your Dev client and check whether any body have changed the standard settings. If so reverse it to the standard SAP setting with the help of your administrator.
Regards
Nirmal

Qa32-confirm the operation before proceeding error even though operation is confirmed.

Hi,
In qa32, while doing ud and while saving, it is showing the error message as confirm the operation before proceeding.even though the operations are confirmed. we are doing the co1f conformation.please find the screenshots for the issue.
we are 3 in process inspections operations with operation nos 25,65,75. The 25,65 operations we are closing in qa32 with force closer. i.e when operation 75 doing ud, the inspection operations 25,65 happening force closer. But in order even though operations are confirming also,it is showing the below error message while doing ud in qa32. Please help me on this. why it is showing that error message even though operations are confirmed.
Regards,
Mastan.

Memory errors have nothing to do with actual lack of RAM. The file is damaged or references a potentially critical external component like a specific printer driver whose info has been stored in the file, a font, a color profile, a linked image or whatever. You need to figure out those problems instead of blindly throwing more resources art the program. As a start, try to open the file on another system. If it works you can limit the investigation to the specific machine and even if it doesn't it may give you a more meaningful warning that helps to diagnose the error.
Mylenium

How to skip dialogue box which ask you to confirm the operation when your used labview to send an e-mail from Outlook?

I'm using Labview to send an e-mail from outlook and everytime I got a dialogue box which inform that a software is trying to send an e-mail. To send this e-mail I have to confirm operation. How can I avoid this dialogue box ?

I don't know what code you're using but the attached VI works with my version of Outlook and doesn't have any pop-up messages. I downloaded it from somewhere a while ago but don't remember where it was from.
Attachments:
Email_sender.vi ‏54 KB

Final confirm one operation sets order status CNF

Here is the issue I am having.
I have PM Order with multiple operations. If I confirm any one operation with 'Final confirmation' checked then Order status changes to CNF and I am unable to do any further confirmation on the order.
I am expecting the order status to be changed to CNF only after ALL the operations have a CNF status, but it is not behaving like that. I searched oss and could not find any relevant notes.
Any suggestions greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
PJ

Philip
Some questions:
- Do all operation have time
- Do all operations have the same Operation Control Key
- Are you using any batch programs to update the order/confirmation
- How are the confirmations created
- Are there any user-exits/BADIs being used on the confirmations
PeteA

Inspection point qty confirmation for operation - INprocess Inspection

Hi Experts,
After doing partial confirmation in the Result recording, the partial confirmed qty moves down to the next operation and is confirmed. But using QM result recording when I try to post the next partial qty, the system cancels the previous confirmation although the next operation has been confirmed for the partial qty. And I am able to confirm the full qty for the operation
How to avoid this situation ?
Regds
Jomy

Dear Jomy,
Please use 150 as the inspection point in your routing header.
But please make sure that in configuration you have this maintained.
SPRO>QM> Quality planning > inspection planning > general > define identifier for inspection point> select the inspection point you are using >double click> function module> maintain in Automatic creation of insp. Points > maintain this function module QAPP_CUST_IP_CREATE > tick the use function module
Test with a new order and lot. Each time you go for RR it will go for new partial lots. So confirmation will get added up as in co11n process.
Hope this helps
Regards
gajesh

Production task confirm/backflush operations

Hey,
I am using the ManagedProducitonLots web services to complete an integration prouect with a third party application. Part of this project will require the third party application to confirm the productionTask. The ability to update the confirmQuantity is available but this does not complete all the same operations as using the 'confirm' button on the productionTask UI. I was hoping that the 'confirm' method would just be an operation in the ManagedProductionlots webservice but its not, so I'm just wondering if anyone else has a workaround for this, or an alternative solution to using this functionality.
Thanks in advance.

Dear Cameron,
1) Go to OP67, here double click on ur control key
2) then last option would be Confirmations
3) so make this field as required for you
4) For all operations make the field as confirmation not required
5) then for last operation make as Mile stone confirmation
6) then confirm the last operation in CO11N
7) or directly confirm the order in CO15
Regards
kumar
Edited by: kumar kumar on Nov 9, 2009 4:42 PM

Milestone confirmation final operation not auto confirming 1st operation

Hi,
We have a Prod Order which has a soft Routing with 3 operations. The third operation is with a control key which allows Milestone Confirmation. When the third operation is confirmed, the first operation is not automatically confirmed.
Need to know why the first operation is not automatically confirmed.
Immediate response is very much appreciated.
Regards

Hi,
Pls check the following
In transaction OPK4> Plant/order type> Maintain Operation sequence as> Error when operation sequence is not adhered.

Collective confirmation for operation

Hi expert
my requirement is below.
suppose in my maintenance order I have three operation
operation 1 with 8hrs 4 person with 2 hr each
operation 2 with 6 hrs 3 person with 2hr each
operation 3 with 4 hr 1person with 4hr
Ii go in IW48 collective confirmation there i do confirmation for only operation 1. save it
next time again I go in iw48 I expect remaining two operation should come in list as for first operation is finally complete.
but it not happens . it is display in list and shows worning meassage for operation 1 while doing again confirmation .
worning meassage is fine but I want even that operation should not come in list . only those operation who are not confirm that should only dispaly in list
how to do this ??
Regards,
prasad

Hi Narasimhan
Thanks
but I tried that also .
this status is system status for order right ?
what happens ......my orderr is having three operation outof this 1 is finaly completed and two are partially . So my order status remains PCNF . so now if I put PCNF status in said field then also all three operation get displayed in next screen
where I want only two operation for which confirmation is not done that should display
one more thing .. ....................when I put selection criteria in IW48 ,in next screen I can able to see all confirmation no and order no matching the criteria .then I select confirmation no and click on ALL ACTUAL DATA button. this showns me conifrmation details and shows error for those finaly completed
Is this right way to make collective confirmation ??
regards,
Prasad

Print confirmation for operation

Hi
In Control key customization, Print confirm is checked
How i can take a Confirmation slip Print out ? In Which Tcode ?
Thanks

Dear Kumar,
Please try the following and revert.
. use tcode COOIS
- give the production order number in the selection at header level.
- in the next screen selection the production order number and display.
- click functions and click print.
This will immediately print the required documents.
Regards
Kannan

CO11N operation wise confirmation inconsistency

Hi all,
I have a scenario like, 8 operations with last operation milestone confirmation in a production order. Letz say we have 500 as total target quantity and in operation 0010 they confirmed all 500 and from operation 0020 onwards they do partial confirmation say 20, 20, etc. At operation 0040 if they have yield of 19, they enter remaining 1 as quality notification (unplanned scrap)and continue to confirm next operation. In operation 0050 they have to enter yield as 19 only even though yield as 20 'coz they have opn adherence check (OPK4) active. As expected SAP thrown an error 'Up to yield 19, opn/0040 predecessor confirmed'. They just want to have a warning and continue enter 20 at opn 0040 and next successive opns. But I am afraid they can enter anything if they if we simply check that in OPK4 as warning message issued. Do we have any other solution other than changing in OPK4?
Another thing is how can they confirm 20 in operation 0030 and 40 in opn 0040, and some other number in opn 0050 though the target quantity is 500 which is being confirmed at the last operation?
I appreciate 4 your valuable suggestions ..
Thanks
Sree...

Hi Vivek,
Thanks for your reply and Sorry for my late response..i Iwill explain the actuual business scenario :
We have total qty is 200 confirmation is done in 4 group 50 each.
For example we have Op10/confirmation optional,Op20/confirmation optional,Op30/confirmation optional and Op40/ milesstoine confirmation..All the Opns are confirmed through milestone atg last operation except in case there is scrap qty is present that particular opn is manually confirmed. For first group of 50, we have 49 yield + 1 scrap at Op20 which is maually confirmed. similarly it requires manual confirmation for all the groups weather are not scrap present for remaining groups. Business does not follow any Opn sequence like they may confirm group 1 at Op20 and froup 2 at Op40 and so on..there may be different quiantities confirmed at different steps of routing. For this I configured adherence check to warning but the requirement also include Op10 to be confirmed whenver Op20 is confirmed though none of them is milestone. Also Op20 to b confirmed whenever Op40 uis confirmed in step 2 or 3 or 4 though it was manually confimred for step 1. I have checked enahancements but none of them seem to satisfy the requirements. I really appreciate your suggestson to solve this one.
Thanks
Sree...

Segregate the scrap as an operation wise during operation confirmation

Hello PP Gurus,
One FERT item's BOM contains 4 HALB items in which 3 are mentioned as an negative qty, ( it may be reusable scrap using in production again), and having 5 operation sequence. The problem is while confirming first operation itself the whole scarp value is generated for those 3 HALB items which are mentioned as an negative value. I want to segregate the scarp value for each and every operation or at least any of operation by qty wise or percentage wise. Is it possible to maintain it in system? and also is it possible to control by order type wise?
Is there any setting to do meet this requirement?
No manual material issue , during confirmation material are issued/generated by using back flush.
Thanks

Hello Mr.Devendra,
Thanks for your reply. I want to do an settings for component allocation by operation wise while during the production operation confirmation. Is there any option or SAP User exit and enhancements?
For example, a FERT 'A' having as an sub assembly 'B','C','D' and having 5 operations(10,20,30,40,50)in Routing. In these 'B' mentioned as an positive qty and the remaining 'C','D' are mentioned as an negative qty. while doing confirmation components are allocated for first operation(10) itself. i want to allocate the component for operation wise. In my case, while confirming operation 20 only part of 'B','C','D' will be allocated and the same for segregate to operation 30,40. How can we handle this situation is there any option?
Thanks

Rework order Operation Confirmation and quantity posting to main order oper

Hi Friends,
I have confirmed first operation of production order by CO11N. While confirming the operation, i entered 5 qty. as Rework Quantity. Due to trigger point function, Rework order gtets generated. After completion of Rework , i confirmed rework Order. Now i want to add this Rework Quantity in the second operation of main order . So i can be able to make confirmation of whole quantity of second operation. How to do this?
Normally system takes the first operation yield quantity as next operation quantity for confirmation.
Waiting for Reply!
Thanks!

Dear,
If a separate rework order is created using the trigger point, the system assumes that both the rework and all subsequent operations are processed via this rework order. As if first operation confirmed as 10 5 as rework quantity.
It means that you can second operation you can confirm as 5 only. So you need to add all operation in reference operation set so confirm all operation quantity here and remaining quantity in main order. So your confirmation yield will remains same.
Or it is only possible to return the successfully reworked quantity to the original order if the quantity check which is executed against the confirmed yield of the predecessor is deactivated using Customizing of the confirmation OPK4. In this case, only the confirmed yield is indeed proposed without the confirmed rework quantity. However, with the quantity check being deactivated it is allowed to overwrite the default value with a larger quantity.
Note that you cannot enter a goods receipt for the rework order since it is defined without header material. Instead, you can enter goods receipts for the original order manually.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Confirmation of operation in MO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for