Confirmation Posting Error

Dear SRM Experts:
system information: SRM 4.0, R/3 4.6c
We have a situation were the confirmation is approved in SRM, but an error occurs when the system is creating a service entry sheet in R/3. The error from BBP_PD is "General error during acceptance posting" which means budget issues.
In R/3, for the PO in the limits tab, the overall limit value is $330.00 and the net price in the confirmation in SRM is 316.00 USD. So I am not sure how the budget exceeded error comes here during posting to R/3 ?
Any ideas.
Points will be rewarded for answers.
Thanks in advance.
Bobby

Hi,
Check the OSS note 854284 .
BR,
Disha.
<b>Pls reward points for useful answers.</b>

Similar Messages

  • Posting period issue while deleting a confirmation posted for a limit PO

    Hi ..
    I am facing an issue whiel deleting a confirmation posted for a limit PO.
    Confirmation was posted for a limit PO in SRM and it created a service entry sheet in SAP. If I deleted that confirmation in the same posting period, then it is getting deleted. No issue here.
    But if I deleted that confirmation in the next posting period then the reversal document is going to error in process. RZ20 is showing the error "Positng only possible in periods 2012/2 and 2012/3".
    Posting date of reversal document is current date only and the backend posting period is 2012/3, but still it is failing with this posting period error.
    If I tried to delete a confirmation posted for a normal PO then I could able to delete it even in next posting period by just changing the posting date.
    Why this posting occurs while deleting the limit confirmation, even through the posting date is falls within the backenn posting periiod? Is it like, SAP system is trying to delete the service entry sheet in original posting period? Kindly help.
    I am in SRM 5.0 (server 5.5) SP12.
    Thanks,
    Arun

    OK.
    Well, if the variable is not used in any interval selection, then I would say "something happened to it".
    I would make a copy of the query and run it to check if I get the same problem with period 12.
       -> If not, something is wrong in the original query (you can proceed as below, if changes to original are permitted).
    If so, then try removing the variable completely from the query and hardcode restriction to 12.
       -> If problem still persists, I would have to do some thinking.
    If problem is gone, then add the variable again. Check.
       -> If problem is back, then the variable "is sick". Only quick thing to do, is to build an identical variable and use that one.
    If problem also happens with the new variable, then it's time to share this experience with someone else and consider raising an OSS.
    Good luck!
    Jacob
    P.S: what fisc year variant are you using?
    Edited by: Jacob Jansen on Jan 25, 2010 8:36 PM

  • Confirmation in error in process

    HI,
    We are using SRM 4.0 (SP12) with extended classic scenario.
    Today morning we had a situation where the batch jobs scheduled in SRM is not displaying in SM37. System couldn't reschedule any of the batch jobs. We ran the house keeping job and then everything seems to be working fine.
    But since evening, the confirmation posted are going to error in process status. IDOC posted in SRM and backend are not in error
    status. Still confirmations are showing as error in process. Till evening confirmaiton was posted without any issues.
    CLEAN_REQREQ_UP and BBP_GET_STATUS_2 jobs are running fine. But the confirmations posted are showing as error in process status. Entries in table BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB is holding the PO from further confirmations. Not sure whether any batch job is not running.
    Could you please help me to fix the issue?
    Thanks,
    Arun

    Hi Arun,
    Try to follow below steps, hope you will get something
    1) Check confirmation application monitor error what is the cause
    2) Check BBP_PD Error Message
    3) Execute the FM (BBP_PD_CONF_TRANSFER_V2) for the error confirmation in SRM and after execute a IDoc will generate (Failed) Iodc
    4) Check related Idoc in WE02 or BD87  and re-process
    5) Check related confirmation in R/3 and SRM
    Regds,
    jai

  • Thru Collective conf goods posting error neds to be avoided going to COGI

    Dear,
    While doing collective confirmation along with Goods posting, If the stock is deficit then error posting generating in COGI. We need to stop error posting in IW42 itself not allowing to post error in COGI. Customisation is already done for Termination for Incorrect Goods Movement.

    Dear,
    When you post via the collective entry as well as when updating dependent goods movements of the collective order processing, no error handling is provided in Standard SAP. If you do this with IW41 it will work for you. If you set In Customizing of the confirmation (Transaction OPK4), I set error handling in case there are any incorrect goods movements.
    Transactions IW41 and IW42 are both considered to be completely separate transactions. In the individual completion confirmation, a linkage occurs between goods movement and completion confirmation that you cannot find in the overall completion confirmation.
    For this reason, the function  "Incorrect good movement"' leads to a termination in Transaction IW41 and not in Transaction IW42.
    Work around for it schedule the program CORUAFFW in background  using SM36 on hourly basis so it will clear the COGI post processing error.
    Hope it will help you.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Missing session confirmation number error..?

    Hi All, i'm facing missing session confirmation number error, when i try to add a product to wishlist for logged in user..?
    Error :
    16:01:57,218 WARN [DAFDropletEventServlet] Missing session confirmation number: Request URI: /store/product/detail.jsp,
    Referer: http://localhost:8180/store/jump/productDetail/Food_&_Candy/Candy_&_Chocolate/Licorice/Licorice_Laces_(2_lb._Bag)/52607
    Code Fragment:
    <dsp:form method="post" action="${wishlisturl}" formid="wishListForm" id="wishListForm" name="wishListForm" >
    <dsp:input type="hidden" bean="GiftlistFormHandler.giftlistId" beanvalue="Profile.wishlist.id"/>
    <dsp:input bean="GiftlistFormHandler.addItemToGiftlistSucessURL" value="wishlisturl" type="hidden"/>
    <dsp:input bean="GiftlistFormHandler.addItemToGiftlistErrorURL" value="wishlisturl" type="hidden" ></dsp:input>
    <dsp:input bean="GiftlistFormHandler.quantity" id="wishQty" type="hidden" value="1" priority="9"></dsp:input>
    <dsp:input type="hidden" bean="GiftlistFormHandler.productId" value="${productId}"/>
    <dsp:input bean="GiftlistFormHandler.catalogRefIds" id="wishlistSku" value="" priority="9" type="hidden"></dsp:input>
    <dsp:input type="hidden" bean="GiftlistFormHandler.AddItemToGiftlist" value="submit"/>
    </dsp:form>
    Please explain why the error being thrown..
    Thanks,
    Vishnu

    Usually you should not get this unless the same form is getting submitted multiple times or outside current session's context. I have also seen this happening sometimes when submitting dsp forms through AJAX. You may check these possibilities.
    Actually ATG uses a request parameter dynSessConf* whose value is a session-confirmation number to verify that the incoming request to ATG is legitimate. On submission of a form or activation of a property-setting <dsp:a> tag, DAFDropletEventServlet in request pipeline checks the value of dynSessConf against the current session's confirmation number. If it detects a mismatch or missing number, it can block form processing and return an error. This mechanism is provided to prevent cross-site scripting attacks and you can configure this behavior through following properties in /atg/dynamo/Configuration:
    enforceSessionConfirmation - specifies whether the request-handling pipeline requires session confirmation in order to process the request; the default value is true.
    warnOnSessionConfirmationFailure - specifies whether to issue a warning on a confirmation number mismatch; the default value is true.
    You can also control session confirmation for individual requests by adding the requiresSessionConfirmation attribute to true or false on the <dsp:form> or <dsp:a> tag like:
    <dsp:form requiresSessionConfirmation="false" ...>
    <dsp:a requiresSessionConfirmation="false" ...>
    When requiresSessionConfirmation attribute is set to false as above, the _dynSessConf parameter is not included in the HTTP request and DAFDropletEventServlet skips validation of this request's session-confirmation number.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       

  • How to catch Posting error in File to IDoc Scenario?

    I have successfully completed File to IDoc Scenario. Now I am interested in catching posting error. i.e., if mapping goes well and when IDoc is being sent to Recipient system then if any posting error is encountered, then a mail should go to a recipient.
    Can anybody suggest the solution.
    Regards,
    Suraj Kumar

    Hi Suraj,
    this can be done by triggerring an alert to the recipient.chk out these links to trigger a alert
    /people/sap.user72/blog/2005/01/14/alert-management--improving-monitoring-of-your-landscape
    /people/sap.user72/blog/2005/01/14/alert-management--improving-monitoring-of-your-landscape
    regards
    jithesh

  • GR/IR Posting Error CKMLGRIR025 - Purchase Order History Inconsistent

    Hi Everyone.
    We currently have a posting in our GRIR for a Feright Condition Value against a Purchase Order which gets the above error when trying to post in MR11.
    The Diagnosis of the error reads:
    "The purchase order history contains differences between the goods receipt and invoice receipts/Account maintenance for the order item in the field Difference Quantitiy (= 43.804 TO) and Difference Value (= -342.77)
    The purchase order history for this tiem is inconsistent"
    When looking at this Freight Condition information in the Purchase Order I can not see why this item has resulted in this error in MR11.
    Has anyone else seen this error come through in their system, and do you have any ideas on how to fix this.
    Thanks
    Hayley

    We are experiencing the same issue with the GRIR Posting Error CKMLGRIR025 - puchase order history inconsistent.  The actual message that we receive is Puchase Order history already inconsistent -->Quantity 1.00 EA Value 0.65-USD.
    We reviewed SAP Note 708649 which also recommends using transaction MIRO with the corresponding default quantity and value o.  However, we are not able to enter an Invoice for the "default qty & value 0", as SAP gives me error message M8278 "You are not allowed to have zero lines" (just like Haley commented).  In reviewing this thread, I did not find the solution to the error message M8278 "You are not allowed to have zero lines" .  Could someone help me understand?
    Thank you!

  • Fi posting error

    Hi SAP gurus,
                        I am facing posting error fi_tax_chk_pricing_data
                       error code 13 builder tax2.
                     plz help me

    hi
    u get this error when u have not specified the county while creating the company code go to  OX02 and give country for the company code. this solves your problem
    rgds
    sree

  • MR11 GR/IR Posting Error - PO History Inconsistent - error message M8278

    Dear experts,
    We have the problem as described in SAP note 708649. Error CKMLGRIR025 - Purchase Order History Inconsistent  
    This has also been described in this thread
    Re: GR/IR Posting Error CKMLGRIR025 - Purchase Order History Inconsistent
    We also have the issue on posting an invoice "default qty & value 0" in MIRO, receiving error M8278 "You are not allowed to have zero lines".
    However, so far we are not able to correct this eg do not know how to continue to clear the GR/IR
    Any help or hints on this matter would be appreciated

    Hi,
    please note that the error message M8 278 is only issued if there is                            
    zero amount in ALL document lines.                                                                               
    This means that you can post MM-documents with zero lines. But only if                          
    there are other lines with amount > 0. The reason for this system                               
    behaviour is, that every time a MM-Invoice is posted, an FI-Document is                         
    created. In FI-Documents it isn't allowed to have zero lines.                                   
    So if you have an MM-Document with only zero lines, the Fi-document                             
    can't be created and the error message is issued.                                               
    I hope I could help you further
    Best regards
    Erika

  • Evaluate button inactive during confirmation posting

    Hi Friends,
    I am working with SRM5.0.
    I have defined a survey and a questionniare for VE during confirmation.
    Have assigned a use group and a user with valid email address to the survey
    In define events for VE, I have made entries for transaction category "confirmation" and have selected "procedure" as "individual-sel. via button".
    I can call the questioonaire from SPRO using right click mouse button on user--> call questionnaire in WEB"
    Also required SICF services are active and I am able to perform VE on portal using Vendor List.
    With these settings, when I perform the VE for the specified product category, I am finding "Evaluate" button inactive during confirmation posting.
    Any hint for my issue? Pls suggest.
    Thanks
    Regards,
    Prashant

    Hi Prashant,
    1) In define events, trying keying in an "*" for vendor & P.Org, enter the source system as your SRM system. Did you assign the survey & questionnaire in this define events. Enter probability as 100. Then try to post a confirmation.
    2) Defining a user group is not mandatory. Hence, you may try to delete this & re-try if point no.1 does not work.
    Cheers,
    Akash

  • PO posting error

    guys,
    i get this posting error when i try to create a purchase order.... please some one help on this??
    tnx
    wiz
    Posting only possible in periods 2009/09 and 2009/08 in company code 2000
    Message no. M7053
    Diagnosis
    The posting date entered is not within one of the permitted posting periods (current period/previous period).
    This can be due to one of two reasons:
    The correct current period has not been set in the system.
    For the system, the first of the entered periods is the current period. At the beginning of a new period, your systems administrator must change the current period in the material master record, using the function "Shift periods". This has not yet been done.
    You have entered a wrong date in the field "Posting date".
    Procedure
    Check the posting date and correct it if necessary. If your input is correct, inform your systems administrator that the "period shifting" (period-end closing) process has not yet been completed. Copied from M8022

    Hi,
    The problem was due to posting period is not open for posting yet.
    I believe you are trying to create PO for Oct 2009. But your posting period was open for Sept 2009 and Aug 2009.
    Go to tcode MMRV to check for company code 2000, current period  09 2009, previous period 08 2009.
    Go to tcode MMPV, enter the company code 2000, period 10 and fiscal year 2009, select "Check and close period" and execute.
    Go to tcode MMRV to check again for company code 2000, current period should be 10 2009, previous period 09 2009.
    You should be able to create a PO by now. If you still fail to do so, please contact your FI to open FI period via tcode OB52.
    Hope it helps.
    Regards,
    JT

  • General Ledger Posting Error (GLT2 051) No accounting transaction variant

    Hello SAP Gurus-
    When testing lockbox in FLB2, I received the following error message:
    General Ledger Posting Error (GLT2 051) No accounting transaction variant assigned to FB01/  /LB
    We are on ECC 6.0
    I created a new Document Type LB
    I created a new G/L account for Lockbox clearing and AR
    How do I fix this?
    Thank you!

    Hi,
    Assign a transaction variant for the document type you created in  Transaction code GSP_VZ3. Also, make sure that the GL accounts affected are assigned with item categories in GSP_LZ2.
    Thanks
    Aravind

  • POST errors need help

    Can any one tell me what the POST error of 2 beeps pause 1 beep is realted to? The system begins to boot flashes video, video shuts off, cmos info flashes shuts off and give post error.

    Use just one stick of RAM in a green slot. Reset the Bios and be sure the machine is not pluged in when you do those things.
    Remove all unneeded hardware so that you don't have stuff in the box when you try to boot that is not needed to post.
    Find out which Bios you have when the screen first comes up.
    You need to know which CPU core you have. If it is a Clwhammer, Newcastle or Winchester then you need Bios version 3.3 If it is a San Diego, Venice or X2 then you need Bios version 9.1.
    Now that you have a system with the correct Bios you can then install your RAM in slots 2 and 4. You should then get a post into dual channel mode.
    Set in Bios first - Optimized Defaults. Make sure that you do not skip this step.
    Now setup the Bios to match the gear in the box. No overclockinmg as yet.
    Now get Windows cleanly installed with any drivers you may need.
    Now you are ready to install those other items you have in your hot little hands. One at a time.

  • (C1) Initialize POST Error Manager (PEM)

    Hello,
    My hardware diagnostic card gives the following error: (C1) Initialize POST Error Manager (PEM). My bios just starts well and gives no error messages.
    I can go to the bios as usually and my computer works normally (at the moment), but QuickTech also gives some error messages:
    - BIOS Buffer overrun check
    - SMBus Host detection
    Maybe that these errors also have to do with it?
    When I try to search with Google I only get some manuals where these error codes are listed, but no more explanations and possible solutions.
    Can somebody please tell me what this problem is all about and how to fix it?
    I have a MSI 6533 bord.

    Hi,
    No, unfortunately not. I posted this question in a lot of different forums, but no one seems to know what's exactly wrong and how to fix it.
    I keep searching, and when I find some answers / solutions, I'll post it here. Can you also please keep me informed if you know some more?

  • Fi posting error due to fiscal period error 1

    HI SAP GURUS,
    I am trying to post TR6 Challan in todays date & getting following message-
    Fi posting error due to fiscal period error 1
    Message no. 8I216
    Diagnosis
    Attempt to post the document in a period outside the current Fiscal
    period  setup.
    Procedure
    Change the posting date  or  Change the fiscal  period prior to posting
    the  transaction under consideration.
    please help me to resolve the issue.
    CHEERS

    HI
    This error is due to Posting period is not open in FI check the posting period is opened for all the accounts in OB52 then post the entries
    hope it will be usefull

Maybe you are looking for

  • External monitor only works with clam shell open

    external monitor only works with clam shell open

  • Authorizing a computer to play songs

    With the new iTunes allowing for iPods to be on more than one computer I was wondering if I authorize a computer to play songs will it allow them to be played and that is all? I just need the songs authorized to play on a computer but if I do will th

  • How to activate 3g iphone??

    so I got sent home to activate my new iphone as most everyone else...but how do I do this? when I plugged it up it just treats it like a new ipod...register w/ apple blah blah blah...now its ready to go but its never done anything as far as getting t

  • PTO Carryover

    Dears I need to set up the expiry date for the Carried Over Days as following: 2012 Days should Carried over to 2013, 2012 Days should not Carried over to 2014. 2013 Days should Carried over to 2014, 2013 Days should not Carried over to 2015. PTO Car

  • Compare and update

    Hello , I have one table where two different coulmn have zip code. Column A have 9 digit Zip and Coulmn B have 5 digit Zip. I want to update the coulmn B (with Remaining last 4 digit of column A ) if first five digit of Coulmn A is Match with Coulmn