Confirmation with COR6N
Hi
I have a problem when I need to confirm my finished product with the trx COR6N, it only shows the components (261), but for the finished product I have to post the confirmation with MIGO. It only happens when I have more than one phase in my master recipe. If I have only one phase, the confirmation for my finished product can be posted in COR6N. My control key has the Aut. Goods receipt checked and confirmation required.
Thanks in advance.
Hi,
Your question is not clear...Automatic goods receipt is not happening when you have more than one phase?? is this is your issue......Automatic goods receipt setting can be done in two places....
1. Control key..assign the control key to the last phase and check...
2. Production scheduling profile..here also you can activate the automatic goods receipt indicator and assign this in work scheduling view in material master then check...
Thanks
Kumar
Similar Messages
-
While confirmation through COR6N
Hi Expert,
We are working in process order scenario. I have one problem while doing confirmation through COR6N (enter time ticket for process orders) there is one field "CONFIRMATION TEXT" & that field is marked mandatory also and user is filling some text as per business needs like "contractor name" But the main concern is that we don't have any pre-entered list of names of contractors in SAP for which users are regularly making mistakes while typing the names.
and the same field is incorporetd in ZMB51 report through table name "AFRU" field name "LTXA1" but some time user entered wrong name and thus report doesnot reflect correct, how to rectify this issue permanently, is there any option to choose text as a drop down list or like any exit/functional module.
Note:- WE ARE ALREADY USING FIELD REASON FOR VARIANCE FOR SOME OTHER PURPOSE.
With Regards
V. Kaushik
SAP-PP Support ConsultantHi kaushik,
It is possible to incorporate some more fields in the Time Ticket confirmation for process industries using the T. code OPK1 here you can choose suitability or wage group or other fields in the initial screen of COR6N, And by configuring your selection criteria for the pre-entered list of names of contractors in a field of suitability or wage group. You can make it mandatory using screen variant.
In this way you will be able to drawn Z-reports as well as the standard reports too.
This may be help you.
Regards
Anant -
Shift Confirmation during COR6N
Hi,
How to do shift confirmation during cor6n? or during a process order confirmation.
I don't see a spot for shift, but if I put the start and finish date,
and time stamp, save.
and go to display - cort,
then I see the shift in the Personnel/ addition data.
This issue is it always comes as 1.
Is there some other way of doing shift confirmation?
I have maintained he appropriate shift sequence, - 3shifts,
assigned to the the resource.
Help will be appreciated.
Thnx!Hi Abhi,
Same issue i have also faced.we managed this issue by making use of reason for variances(GRUND)field where we difined 3 shifts in reason for variance in customising and we made that field mandatory.we changed that field name as Shift.when ever during confirmation is being done users were entering the shifts in this field.
reason for variance ,we wre capturing in confirmation text.
discuss with the buisnees ,is that ok and decide
with regards
Girish A -
No material is transferred in storage location after confirmation in COR6N.
Dear Master,
When I confirm in cor6n there is movement of goods & confirmation takes place.But there is no transfer of material in storage location & even when the order is checked the delivered QTY is zero.Since my process has 3 confirmation ( i.e 2 milestone & 1 Auto GR ).
Also the material is backflushed.
Kindly suggestDear Chintan,
1.Check the Delivered quantity after performing GR(manual/auto GR) for the process order.
2.Assuming you have completed the 2 milestone confirmation and the final confirmation along with auto GR,incase if you are
unable to find the quantity in stock,check for error goods movements in COGI.Only after clearing the 101 error movement,check
the quantity update in the delivered field in COR3.
Check and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S -
I have just transferred my entire application file from an Imac to an identical Imac, both running OS 10.9.5. Everything works fine, excepting that when I attempt to open Photoshop 6, I am prompted for the serial number. I enter the serial number provided by Adobe, which I have confirmed with my "previous purchase" records kept by Adobe. It is demanding a "qualifying product", all of which is contained in the complete files I transferred. Why can't Adobe recognise my valid serial number for Photoshop 6?
I have just transferred my entire application file from an Imac to an identical Imac,
Say what?
Please use the proper installer.
Are you really talking about Photoshop 6 or about Photoshop CS6? -
Goods confirmation with quantity 0 and final delivery set
Dear SRM Experts,
I would like to share with you the below problem that i asked to be answered from SAP support and would appreciate any solution suggestions for this problem.
The problem I'm facing is relevant for two of my clients: one using SRM 4.0 with ECC 5.0 and the other using SRM 5.0 with ECC 6.0.
I was looking for a note solution concerning goods receipt reappearing in the confirmation screen (BBPCF02) although the confirmed quantity was equal to the ordered quantity and by chance I came up against note 1292032 - Goods confirmation with quantity 0 and final delivery set; that was released after a long list of notes that DID ALLOW the posting of Goods confirmation with quantity 0 and final delivery set.
[Note 1292032|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1292032]
Applying this note through the note implementation or Support package will ELIMINATE the option for the Goods Recipient (that do not have and will not have a PO change authorization) to indicate in any way that he is not expecting to receive those goods.
Please follow the below example to exemplify this problem:
A PO was created as follow:
Item Product Quantity Price
1 A1 10 10
2 A2 10 12
3 A3 10 14
4 A4 10 16
5 A5 10 18
6 A6 10 20
A first confirmation was created for the following products and quantities:
Item Product Quantity Final Delivery
1 A1 5 X
4 A4 10
5 A5 2
A second and FINAL confirmation was created for the following products and quantities:
Item Product Quantity Final Delivery
2 A2 8 X
3 A3 10
So at the conclusion of the above example:
For items 1; 2; 3; 4 the delivery completed indicator should be set as all expected quantities were delivered, as per items 5 and 6 they will remain open and as of note 1292032 there will be no way that the Goods Recipient can indicate IN THE SYSTEM that he is not expecting any more deliveries (keep in mind that he do not have any PO change authorization), and the PO will remain as opened and will keep appearing in the Confirm Goods / Services transaction.
Sending an e-mail to the purchaser, asking to set the Delivery Completed indicator in the PO is not a feasible option as all process should be backed up by the system and sending e-mails cannot be monitored by the system.
Kind Regards,
Raz Golan
Edited by: Raz Golan on Sep 24, 2009 1:16 PM.
-
Confirmation with Serial Number
Hi all,
Can anyone explain what's the purpose and how it works with confirmation with serial number? I already do customizing for one single entry confirmation to make serial number appear on CO11n.
regards,
ArmanWhat ever we entering the serial number In Confirmation, Its updating In COIB transaction after transfer you can see the list in
1) Go to IH20 or IH22
give the material No and serial No U can get the Installation Base No.
2) Go To IB53
give the installation No, U can see the assigned serial No . for header material
BUT there is no standard report for serial no relate with order operation
And the table related to serial No "EQUI" is no where link between the any Confirmation table. -
PO Confirmations with Multiple Line items
Hi Experts,
In our Business Scenario, the Purchase Order Confirmations are being received by IDoc from Vendors. IDoc Basic Type is ORDERS01.
Issue is when we have one PO line item, then the IDoc is getting processed successfully. But when we have Multiple PO line items, then the IDoc is failing with the following error
Material number differs from that of ordered material 000000000001797950
Message no. ME790
Diagnosis
The acknowledgment/confirmation for purchase order no. 8195817140 with item 00002 cannot be adopted because the customer material number from the IDOC differs from the material number 000000000001797950 from the PO.
Procedure
Either change the customer material number in the IDOC or get the vendor to send a new acknowledgment/confirmation with the correct material number.
There is no control observed in the Material. For the second line item of the PO it is happening. If this Material is a first line item in the PO, then this issue won't be there.
Request for your inputs please
Thank you,
Best Regards,
Ramakrishna MangenaHi,
Use T code WE60 to search for the segment documentation of IDoc type
IDoc needs three different kinds of segment types:
E1EDK01 is the main segment of an ORDERS01 IDoc.Used for calling program to pass the SAP IDoc syntax check.
E1EDP01 is the segment for a single order position. The field MENGE contains the quantity. Of course, this segment can occur more the once.
E1EDP19 represents an object definition. In this case the object is a material number. The field QUALF is therefore set to 002 and the material number is written into the IDTNR field. E1EDP19 segments are always children of E1EDP01
Thanks & regards,
ShreeMohan -
Cannot Print Order Confirmation with Smartforms
Dear Sir/ Madam,
I tried to print Order confirmation with Smartform but failed with the return message as "Output could not be issued".
The followings were my settings:.
At NACE, the Processing rouines confiugration for Application: V1, Output Type:BA00 was
Medium: 1 Print output
Program: R2RRVADOR01
Form routine: ENTRY
PDF/SmartForm Form: R2RBL_SDORC_L
Type: Smartform
At VA02, the output was added as:
Output: BA00
Description: Order Confirmation
Medium: 1 Printout
Func: SP
Lng: EN
Could anyone consult out?
Cheers,
Simon
Cheers,
SimonHI,
In Txn. NACE... Select your "Application V1".. then choose the button "condition Record" then choose your output type then maintain the condtion..
Doc Type: <Value>
Function: SP
Medium 1
Date/Time: 4
Language:EN...
then choose the line and click on "Communication" button here maintain the "output Device, flag print immedieately/release After output.
and then try again.
If your using Smartform/Scriptform then you need to define like this:
Medium: 1 Print output
Program: R2RRVADOR01
Form routine: ENTRY
Form: R2RBL_SDORC_L
*PDF/SmartForm Form: *******Blank
*Type: ******Blank
Regards
GK.
Edited by: Gnana Kumar on Nov 17, 2010 5:24 AM -
Overdelivery % ignores while confirmation with capacity category and splits
Dear all,
System ignores Over-delivery % while confirmation with capacity category and splits only.
Note:
1.Error message set for overdelivery in OPK4.
2.Check box for Unlimited Overdelivery in material master(Work Scheduling View) as well as in the production order is OFF.
Thanks,
SatyajitHi,
Set in OPK4=>
1)Overdelivery = Error when overdelivery tollerance is exceed.
Set in material MM02= in Work scheduling
1)Maintian Underdelivery Limit and Overdelivery Limit
2)Remove Tick of Indicator: Unlimited (Indicator: Unlimited Overdelivery Allowed)
Overdelivery tolerance limit=> Percent by which the quantity that is posted to goods receipt may exceed the production order quantity.
Indicator: Unlimited Overdelivery Allowed=> Indicator that specifies whether the quantity actually delivered may infinitely exceed the required production order quantity.
With Regards,
Ashish -
User Exit for Production Order confirmation with CO15
Hi All,
what User Exit I should use when validating batch when we do Production Order confirmation with CO15.
Not when we create or release a Production Order.
Will reward,
mindaugas
Edited by: Mindaugas Kazlauskas on Jan 30, 2008 5:03 PMHi
The Follwing Userexits available:
Transaction Code - CO15 Enter Production order Confirmation
Enhancement/ Business Add-in Description
Enhancement
CONFPP01
PP order conf.: Determine customer specific default values
CONFPP02
PP order conf.: Customer specific input checks 1
CONFPP03
PP order conf.: Cust. specific check after op. selection
CONFPP04
PP order conf.: Customer specific input checks 2
CONFPP05
PP order conf.: Customer specific enhancements when saving
CONFPP06
PP Order Confirmations: Actual Data Transfer
CONFPP07
Single Screen Entry: Inclusion of User-Defined Subscreens
CONFPS01
PS confirmation: Determine customer specific default values
CONFPS02
PS confirmation: Customer specific input checks 1
CONFPS03
PS confirmation: Customer specific check after op. selection
CONFPS04
PS confirmation: Customer specific input checks 2
CONFPS05
PS confirmation: Customer specific enhancements when saving
CONF0001
Enhancements in order confirmation
CONFPI01
Process order conf.: Calculate cust.specific default values
CONFPI02
Process order confirmation: Customer spec. input checks 1
CONFPI03
Process order conf.: Cust. spec. check after op. selection
CONFPI04
Process order conf.: Customer specific input checks 2
CONFPI05
Process order conf.: Cust. spec. enhancements when saving
CONFPI06
Process order confirmation: Actual data transfer
CONFPM01
PM/SM order conf.: Determine cust. specific default values
CONFPM02
PM/SM order confirmation: Customer specific input checks 1
CONFPM03
PM/SM order conf.: Cust. spec. check after op. selection
CONFPM04
PM/SM order conf.: Customer specific input check 2
CONFPM05
PM/SM order conf.: Cust. specific enhancements when saving
If it is helpful rewards points.
Regards
Pratp.M -
Cancel the Confirmation with CN29
Hi All,
I have a activity with confirmed with the statsu of CONF. Now i need to concel the confirmation. Iam trying in CN29. But it is not turning back. Please guide for the solution.
Thanks in Advance.in sap it will not turn back but post a reversal entry
is settlement done? if yes you need to reverse settlement first then reverse confirmation -
Internal Activity partial confirmation with breaks
How to a maintain a actvity confirmation with breaks, say for eaxample one internal activty is completed as shown below :
i) completed 20% - from 01.07.09 to 05.07.09 - 5 days
ii) completed 30% - from 10.07.09 to 20.07.09 - 11 days
iii) Completed last 40% - from 25.07.09 to 10.08.09 - 17 days
i.e No part of the activity is executed in between the dates 06.07.09 to 09.07.09 & from 21.07.09 to 24.07.09. it is tarted on 01.07.09 and finally completed on 10.08.09 - (Actually it is taken 33 days) - not 40 daysHi Chittaranjan Mohanty ,
Your requirement has conflict with the Intepration of term 'duration' and 'work' in SAP standard.
The duration is not take the break into account. E.g. an activity has duration 20 days (4 weeks) and the work = 4 hours, may the person only do 1 hour for this activity.
For the progress it is does not matter, if therre is a break in the time frame or not. The important is how many works are done till now. The time are keeping going.
The flag 'exact break' for the scheduling has other usage, has nothing to do with your case, see consulting note 151551.
Kind regards,
Zhenbo -
Procedure Confirmed with Comparing Dates
Trying to compare two dates, and there's so many ways I'm
just getting a bit
confused.
I have a date stored in my database in a timestamp field with
this format:
2006-03-05 19:13:05
I have a term defined in months (in the database) of how long
the account is
valid:
term: 12
I can now almost get the expired date, with this code, where
$vDate is the
untouched date from my database, and $term is the term in
months.
$blog2 = date("M jS Y",strtotime($vDate,'+'.$term.'
Month'));
But it only increments the months, not the years.
Now, here's my problem:
I can create an array with expired and current dates, but
then I have to
construct a moderately complex if/elseif statement to check
year, then
month, then day.
Is there a better way? IE, can anybody think of a method in
which I can
compare the dates more efficiently? I'm going in circles.
Everytime I
think I've almost got it, I lose something.
Any suggestions?
TIA,
JonDavid, thank you for replying.
I was just looking at doing it with SQL, but here is my
question/problem:
I am doing this for a client database of hosting customers -
a one-stop list
so we can see who's due. I'm worried about having two sql
queries per
customer. Currently it wouldn't be a big deal, but hopefully
in the future
it would be.
Can you confirm this would be an issue? If it is an issue,
can you take a
peek at my code below? Can you confirm I'm either bass
ackwards or on the
right track to do this in PHP? As I stated, if there's an
easy SQL solution
that won't cause extra load on the server, cool.
I'm doing it as such now (my previous method was not
working):
$dates1 = create_Dates($renewDate);
//Create_dates function listed below
$status = account_expire($dates1);
echo $status;
//account_expire function below:
//Create Dates function:
function create_Dates($date){
$date = strtotime($date);
$dates['eM'] = date("m",$date);
$dates['eD'] = date("j",$date);
$dates['eY'] = date("Y",$date);
$dates['cM'] = date("m");
$dates['cD'] = date("j");
$dates['cY'] = date("Y");
return $dates;
//and this long bore is my if/else to check dates:
function account_expire($dateAray){
//exploding an array would be best
$eM = $dates['eM'];
$eD = $dates['eD'];
$eY = $dates['eY'];
$cM = $dates['cM'];
$cD = $dates['cD'];
$cY = $dates['cY'];
//this is where we begin calculating
if($eY > $cY){ //07 > 06
$status = 'Paid';
return $status;
elseif($eY < $cY){
$status = 'EXPIRED';
return $status;
elseif($eY == $cY){
if($eM > $cM){
$status = 'Paid';
return $status;
elseif($eM < $cM){
$status = 'EXPIRED';
return $status;
elseif($eM == $cM){
if($eD > $cD){
$status = 'EXPIRED';
return $status;
elseif($eD <= $cD){
$status = 'Paid';
return $status;
>
> Use the MySQL DATE_ADD() function:
>
>
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/date-and-time-functions.html
>
> SELECT registered, DATE_ADD(registered, INTERVAL 12
MONTH) AS expiry
> FROM myTable
>
> If your expiry dates are always 12 months ahead, that
can be hard coded
> into your SQL. If the terms are variable, do a SELECT
query first to get
> the term, then do a second query using the first result. -
Error while doing confirmation with cor6
Dear PP gurus,
I am getting following error while doing confirmation. please suggest.
"Error while importing from memory QAPO SAPLQEEV
0400000363"
Thanks in advance
Kailash T.Hi,
The structure QAPO relates to Inspection operation records & the program - SAPLQEEV relates to Spec. tables for results recording. Hence would suggest to discuss this with your QM personnel.
Also was able to find a link which had a same issue, but no solution posted, have a look if it helps in anyway
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=27&t=173200
Also refer to OSS note - 334400. If all the above does not resolve the issue, raise an OSS message with SAP.
Regards,
Vivek
Maybe you are looking for
-
Split Valuation Material Cost Estimate into COPA
Hi all, Is there any way how we can transfer the split valuation material cost estimate into COPA? I checked the actual line items, there is no "valuation type / batch" characteristics there. Is this the main cause? Please kindly suggest on the best
-
Keynote document stuck 'updating' in iCloud
Summary A keynote file on iCloud.com displays "updating..." when clicked on, and is unavailable for download. The same document will also not download to iOS5 devices. Background At the time I upgraded my iPad to iOS5 I had a 20mb Keynote presentatio
-
ITunes and Windows Server 2008 (32-bit Enterprise)?
I tried installing iTunes 7.2 and 7.6.1 on my 32-bit Windows Server 2008 testing machine. It seems that 7.2 (with the standalone Quicktime 7.1.6 installed first) installed without any problem, but 7.6.1 seems that it cannot install some components (s
-
Where can I find layouts for Pages? Some models for us to use, like we can see in Appleworks and Word ( to do list, shopping list... and this kind of stuff) CV
-
RS480M2 - No boot after replacing RAM
A pair of RAM sticks originally installed in the slot 1 and 2 were DDR400 2x256MB with 3-3-3-8. Then before installing Vistax86 a new pair being DDR400 2x512MB 2-2-2-6 were installed in the slot 3 and 4. Everything appeared working fine except cpu-z