Confirmations/Invoices in EBP-SUS scenario

Hi,
We are upgrading from SRM5.0 to SRM7.0. We are in extended classic scenario and would like to use EBP-SUS. Full functionality of SUS is not supported in EBP-SUS. Only order response is supported in standard EBP-SUS scenario. But we heard that it is possible to enable Confirmation/Invoices in EBP-SUS through BAdI and PI mappings. Has anyone done this before. If so could you share the procedure to enable the confirmations/invoices in EBP-SUS and any limitations on the functionality (like invoice reversals ..etc)
Thanks
Sukumar

Hi Yang,
In EBP-SUS or commonly SRM-SUS scenario , vendors are replicated to the SUS system automaticallywhen you create them in SAP SRM using manage business partners web transaction. Ensure that you select the "Portal Vendor " checkbox while creating the vendor.
before that please replicate company data to SUS using tcode BBP_SP_COMP_INI.
Also i believe you must have created vendor org structure in the SUS client.
Cheers
Iftekhar Alam

Similar Messages

SUS Invoicing in EBP-SUS Scenario

Hello SRM Gurus,
Due to various business process we will be deploying ECS SRM with EBP-SUS scenario. We have strong requirement to provide PO invoice and non PO invoices ( eg utilities) via SUS. I know EBP-SUS scenario is limited to POR, I would apprecite if anyone has implemented invoicing in SUS as people tell me it is technically possible. If so, please share information.
-thanks!
Shilpa

Hi
Please go through this which might give you some useful details ->
In the original business package for SRM 5.0, the two iViews , "Invoice Monitor" and "Setting for Invoice Monitor" , are not included in the content. But for some business cases, these two iView are required.
To add these two new iViews change the business package content manually as described below in the Release-Independent SAP OSS Note 928764:
Note 928764 - BP SRM 5.0: Add two new iViews to standard business package
Note 543544 SUS: Extended Classic Scenario for EBP not supported
Note 662077 - No values return for Order/Contract Simulation on Invc Pymnt
Note 1096691 EBP invoice from SUS in ECS gets 'To Be Corrected Manually'
Note 1064557 SRM 6.0 SP02: Additional Notes to be applied on SRM Server
Note 700350 Supplier Enablement: Deployment Scenarios integrating SUS
Note 1024334 Error when sending invoices to EBP
Note 947198 IMS monitor: Web Dynpro with hierarchies
Note 836943 BP SRM 50 Additional Installation Information
Note 733255 BP Supplier Coll. 60.1: installation information
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Item level attachments in confirmation sent from SUS in EBP-SUS scenario

Dear colleagues,
I am in SRM 5.0
In an EBP-SUS scenario, I have created a Confirmation for a Purchase Order with an attachment added at header level of confirmation as well as item level of confirmation and sent to EBP.
The XML that reaches EBP has both the attachments but effectively the confirmation that gets created in EBP has attachment only in header level and the item level attachment is missing.
Could any of you with your experience let me know whether it is a limitation or is it possible to send attachments in item level to EBP?
Many thanks.
Best regards,
Srivatsa Ganesh V
SAP Labs

vatsa,
if the xml message has both the attachments , then it is a problem.
please debug the inbound of xml , it is very easy to find out whether both the attachments are considered in the creation of the document.
use transaction sxi_support and the inbound xml for debugging.

SUS Material PO for EBP-SUS scenario

Hi All,
We are planning to implement EBP-SUS scenario for PO.
My Question is Can we use EBP-SUS scenario for material PO,POR and ASN
in extended classic mode.
Please help.I need this info urgently.
Also if anyone has config settings document for this scenaio then I would appreciate
if they can share with me Priyasinghsap at gmail
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Priya
Edited by: priyasinghsrm on May 23, 2010 11:20 PM

As far as I know, extended classic senario is not supported in SUS, only the following senarios is supported.
1) SUS-SRM ( In this case, SRM should be local.)
2)SUS-MM(R/3) (Only separate ERP system)
Because, in extended (classic) , there're over ERP/EBP systems, when post confirmation, system might have problem,
Eventhough, some customers is using, but this senario is not supported and customer need modification to archive this.
The SUS-EBP (service procurement) and SUS-MM (plan driven procurement) can be used only separately but not mixed.
Does anybody have more inputs?
Regards
Lauren

Query involving XI 7.0 (PI 7.0) on SAP SRM 5.0 (EBP - SUS Scenario)

hi,
I am currently working on SRM EBP-SUS scenario which makes use of XI 7.0.
while reading through the posts on this scenario, prior to XI 7.0,mapping content had to be imported into XI repository.
as per XI 7.0 is it required to import the mapping content into IR or it is already shipped into IR.
any help is appreciated.
thanks in advance.

Hi,
If you export the mapping content in previous version then that can be imported into IR, in MM ctrShift0 then you will get on window ther you can import the mapping .
Is this your requirment?
Regards
Chilla

EBP SUS scenario ---sending a PO output from EBP to SUS

Hi All,
We are working on EBP SUS scenario with SRM 5.0 and ECC6.0 as the backend.
We are creating a PO in the EBP which is to be sent to SUS for creating a POR in SUS from vendor.
1) How do we configure the PO output from EBP to SUS system?
We could see one method call in Set output actions and output format for sending XML purchase orders. How do we configure this to send it to SUS.
2) Is it possible to have EBP and SUS in one client where from we will create a PO and send it to SUS?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Sridhar.

hi,
there is one customizing setting available --> you need to set this in your SRM system
transaction --> spro ---> supplier relationship Management --> SRM Server --> cross application basic settings -->
Set output actions and output format --->Condition dependent document output
in this setting select --> purchase order ---> you can see four actions --->
for the last action --->Method call ---> Time of processing ---> should be -->Processing when saving document.
2) it is possible to have SUS and EBP in same client.
You can refer to few notes available on service market place.
---> it is not to be used for productive use --> only for demo purpose.
one thing i remember is --> the system type in the scenario is EBP_SUS ( One client EBP and SUS )
Edited by: khan voyalpad usman on Feb 19, 2008 12:59 AM

We are use EBP-SUS scenario, WF is not steady

We are use EBP-SUS scenario, there are 1% POs will be awaitting approval even we configured PO WF as non-approval for PO.
Additional, we use start condition for non-approval PO type, almost POs is OK, but still 1% POs is error with wrong status even it is non-approval PO type.
Who can tell me why it caused?
Thanks very much!

the search result is differrent with the other WI, only have 1 record as below:
635804 (子)工作流中文 PCO 编号 3000001158, GUID 49A68A6351D700CDE10080000A100649 的自动转换
the english text as below:
635804 Sub workflow english PCO 3000001158, GUID 49A68A6351D700CDE10080000A100649 automatically convert

Unable to create confirmation/invoice in SRM,Classic Scenario

Hi Guru's,
I am unable to create Confirmation/Invoice in the Portal, attached the screen shot of the error
its is the problem with the ADRC table, there is no entry in the table for the BP.
I tried to access the table via SM30 to add the entry in ADRC manually, I get a message table maintenance not defined
Regards,
Kiran

Hi Kiran,
Could you please also advise whether all the users are not able to create the confirmation in portal. Or if there is any specific user who is not able to do that?
And I also request you to advise whether you going to do the invoice in SRM portal in classic scenario?
Best Regards,
Bharathi

SRM-PI Integration for Supplier and Company Replication ( EBP-SUS Scenario)

Dear Experts,
We are doing a scenario where we are trying to replicate the Company and the Vendors from EBP to SUS via tcode-
BBP_SP_COMP_INI and BBP_SP_SUPP_INI.
When we are doing this in EBP , at SLG1 it is showing the replication done successfully. I have also checked in EBP - SXI_MONITOR the corresponding XML messages has been successfully generated and the respective proxies are called.
But these messages are failing in XI.
In XI the corresponding service interfaces are used -
from EBP (outbound) - SupplierPortalTradingPartner_CreateOrChange_Out http://sap.com/xi/EBP
to SUS (Inbound)- SupplierPortalTradingPartner_CreateOrChange_In http://sap.com/xi/SRM/SupplierEnablement
corresponding interface mapping used- EBP40Partner2SRM40Partner http://sap.com/xi/SRM/SupplierEnablement/Global/IC
corresponding message mapping used - EBP40Partner2SRM40Partner http://sap.com/xi/SRM/SupplierEnablement/Global/IC
data type used TradingPartnerCreateOrChangeInternalOut http://sap.com/xi/EBP
We are doing this scenario from SAP Pre-delivered standard content -
 Service_Procurement_SupplierEnablement
in XI the inbound message is failing at mapping step, it is showing the below error-
Cannot produce target element /ns1:SupplierPortalTradingPartner/Method. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd
I have also tried to test the mapping in test tab with the same payload but it showing the same error, even if I try it with a blank payload error remains same.
below is the error I got-
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>Application</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">EXCEPTION_DURING_EXECUTE</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>com/sap/xi/tf/_EBP40Partner2SRM40Partner_</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3>RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformatio~</SAP:P3>
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException thrown during application mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_EBP40Partner2SRM40Partner_: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformatio~</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
Trace -
<Trace level="1" type="T">com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Cannot produce target element /ns1:SupplierPortalTradingPartner/Method. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.AMappingProgram.start(AMappingProgram.java:420) at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.Transformer.start(Transformer.java:142) at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.AMappingProgram.execute(AMappingProgram.java:118) at com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.mapping.JavaMapping.executeStep
I have gone through this thread SRM-SUS Scenerio Replicating company code and suppliers to SUS via XI
but I think we can not change this interfaces as mentioned here as we are using standard SAP content.
Any help would be very much appreciated.
Thanks
SUgata B Majumder

Hi All,
I have resolved the issue.
it was a cache problem. I have changed the map, just edited description and activated the map. Though it was a SAP standard Map. I have made the objects as modifiable from SWCV and all the messages are processed.
Thanks

Clarifications on EBP-SUS and MM-SUS Scenario

Hi !
We are planning to implement EBP-SUS and MM-SUS in one Client . Request you to help us on the following issues.
1. While the outbound messages will not have a problem from MM & EBP, how do we route inbound messages to MM & EBP effectively. Should be handle it in XI ?? If ues, what is the best criteria .
2. Since both the config guides for MM-SUS and EBP-SUS scenarios include transactions for transferring Vendor & Comapny Code data, how do we check duplication.For ex : if we transfer a Vendor from R/3 and subsequently try to transfer the same vendor from EBP , is there any inbuilt duplicate check ?
3. In MM-SUS, an ASN created in SUS creates an inbound delivery is created in MM. What would happen in case of EBP-SUS i.e when an ASN is created for an EBP PO ? We are on extended classic scenario ?
4.If you do a confirmation in EBP-SUS, will a GR be generated in both EBP and subsequently in MM.
Request yr help pl.
Regards

Hi
Welcome to world of SRM.
I guess, you must have got enough details in the SRM guides.
Anyways, better to understand the basics first,, before going in detail. I hope this will answer all your queries.
Refer to these links ->
Supplier Enablement
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/cd/0e343e47fd6b2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
SUS-EBP Scenario
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/06/0f343e47fd6b2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
SUS-MM Scenario
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/39/0f343e47fd6b2ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Supplier Self-services
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/25/99b13c48740d55e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Procurement
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/8e/e5623c046a9b67e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Users in SRM user Management
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/cd/6313513813554e941a02a91540c29e/frameset.htm
Please try this SAP OSS notes as well to get System architecture details->
Note 982871 - Consulting services: supplier integration in SRM
963000 - Usage and release of SRM as AddOn to ECC in ERP2005
868192 - Consulting solution: SUS-MM (SUS-MMSRV) service procurement
573383 - EBP and SUS deployment variants
Also do read this ->
Check whether the roles delivered by SAP meet your requirements. If not, you can create new roles and assign transactions to them. We recommend that you copy standard roles and tailor them to your requirements.
All users assigned to a respective role are then allowed to carry out the transactions. If required, you can refine the authorization check on the tab page Authorizations.
Standard SAP Single-roles
SAP_EC_SUS_ADMIN_PURCHASER (for purchasing administrators - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
SAP_EC_SUS_BIDDER (for bidders - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
SAP_EC_SUS_DISPATCHER (for dispatchers - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
SAP_EC_SUS_INVOICER (for invoicers - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
SAP_EC_SUS_ORDER_PROCESSOR (for order processors - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
SAP_EC_SUS_MANAGER (for managers - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
SAP_EC_SUS_SERVICE_AGENT (for service agents - SAP Supplier Self-Services)
If you want to use SAP Supplier Self-Services, proceed as follows:
1. Select one of the following single roles:
SAP_EC_SUS_ADMIN_PURCHASER
SAP_EC_SUS_ADMIN_VENDOR
SAP_EC_SUS_BIDDER
SAP_EC_SUS_DISPATCHER
SAP_EC_SUS_INVOICER
SAP_EC_SUS_MANAGER
SAP_EC_SUS_ORDER_PROCESSOR
SAP_EC_SUS_PRODUCT_MANAGER
SAP_EC_SUS_SAR_PROCESSOR
SAP_EC_SUS_SERVICE_AGENT
SAP_EC_SUS_SERVICE_MANAGER
2. Choose Change Roles.
3. Choose the Personalization tab page.
Note: The personalization applies to all roles, meaning the user can also create his own roles, for example copying the delivered SAP SUS roles. He can tailor these roles to his requirements by changing the SUS-specific attributes (BBP_SUS_ROLE_ATTRIBUTES).
1. Select the entry BBP_SUS_ROLE_ATTRIBUTES (SUS-specific role attributes).
2. Choose Change values.
A dialog box for maintaining SUS-specific roles appears.
3. If required, perform the following steps:
If the role should be displayed in the SUS User Management (UM) and should be able to be assigned to the relevant user by the supplier administrator, set the indicator to display the role in SUS UM.
If the user should be displayed as a service agent for the purchaser, set the Service agent indicator.
If you want to define the user as an SRM administrator, set the SRM administrator indicator. The user is then authorized to change all supplier data.
If want to assign the role SUS administrator automatically to the user during registration, set the SUS administratorindicator.
Sets the relevant indicators if you want users to receive the following notifications: Notification If Purchase Order Not Opened, Notification If Purchase Order Response Is Missing, Notification If ASN Is Missing, Notification If ConfirmationIs Missing, Notification If Invoice Is Missing,
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

SUS Scenarios

Hello Guys:
I am a little confused about all the different deployment scenarios when you integrate SRM with SUS, and I am not sure if you could help me to solve some questions I have
I have the requirement to be able to retrieve PO, POR, confirmations and Invoices from SUS to the backend for direct and indirect materials so what I understand is this:
If I implement the MM-SUS scenario I will be able to retrieve these documents from SUS directly to the backend system. but what happens with the requirements coming from EBP (Shopping Cart)?? can I implement also the EBP - SUS scenario in order to procure indirect materials and retrieve these documents to the backend?? the EBP should be in the classic or in the classic extended scenario?? I know the CES only support PO and POR collaboration and some enhancements need to be done for the rest of the documents, but I that means the classic scenario supports all the follow on documents (PO, POR, Confirmation and Invoice)?? Should I use the classic scenario for my EBP-SUS integration for the indirect materials and the MM-SUS for the direct ones in order to fulfill my requirement??
Hugo

Hi,
You need PI in ROS if you are using ROS in conjunction with SUS. Say after selecting a vendor you now want to do business with this vendor, so you will have to push him from SRM to SUS system. PI is needed for this push.
And yes for document exchange (PO/PO response/ASN/IV) between you and the supplier you need SUS
Regards,
Nikhil

Net value confirmed in POR in Classic scenario

Hi everyone,
In SUS, as you know, the vendor can confirm the net value for the items; however, I can't see this new net value in R/3. This is normal or where I can see this value??
Thanks,
Ivá

hi,
I have seen in the EBP-SUS scenario , it is possible to compare
purchase order and purchase order response which the supplier had sent
1) in the case of MM-SUS scneario , as far as i know , there is no point where you can compare --> purchase order and purchase order response.
2)there is also possibility that , the purchaser in R/3 mentions an toleranc limite -->if the changed date , quantity , price from the supplier is beyond a certain specified tolerance limit , system would not post the
IDOC and follow-on document will not be created in R/3.
3) this way purchaser makes sure that the supplier does not change the values beyond a certain limit.
4) you can also check --> for the item changes --> in the R/3 purchaser order --> to check wether the changes supplier has done are recorded (or) not... , i am not sure about this though...

EBP - SUS integration

Hi experts,
I m new to SRM5.0. Can any one explain me abt EBP-SUS integration? Wt is the need of this integration? wt r the prerequisites to this? I m using EBP4.0 and SRM5.0.
Kindly help me on this.
Regards
Raaams.

hi,
in EBP -SUS scenario --> three systems are involved.
1) EBP(SRM) System ( CLIENT xxx)
2) SUS System ( CLIENT yyy)
3) XI System ( CLIENT zzz).
EBP(SRM) system client can be on the same server as SUS System client.
It is also possible to have these SRM (EBP) and SUS Clients on different servers.
It is also possible to have one client scenario ( EBP and SUS ) in the same client , But SAP Recommends this not to be used for productive use and to be used for demo purpose.
XI system is required to integrate SRM and SUS , this is to transfer documents ( in the form XML Messages ) from one system to another.
proxies are used in this scenario.

EBP-SUS - Purchase Order Response (POR) with attachments

Hi,
I am working on EBP-SUS scenario with EBP in Extended classic scenario.
I have couple of questions regarding Purchase Order Response in SUS with attachments. I appreciate your response to these questions.
1. From SUS, when the Supplier responds to a PO with attachment, does the attachment get copied over to SRM PO?
2. If so, in case of extended classic scenario, does the attachment get sent to MM?
Thanks,
Surendra

Khan,
Thanks for your reply.
So, in case of EBP-SUS scenario, if the supplier sends attachment, the attachment gets copied over to PO when the POResponse is copied over? I tried this scenario and the attachment is appearing on PO Response record. However, does not seem to get copied over to PO when the "Copy" button was pressed. Am I missing any configuration?
Thanks,
Surendra

Not able to see Invoice sent by SUS to EBP in Portal

Hi,
I am trying to send Invoice from SRM SUS to SRM EBP via XML in Extended Classic Scenario(Using Service_Procurement_Supplier_Enablement XI scenario). I am able to sucessfully send and receive XML from SRM SUS to SRM EBP checked in SXMB_MONI in SUS, XI and EBP. I am using SRM SERVER 7.0.
Also i have checked in BBP_PD t-code in SRM EBP for BUS2205 Object, Invoice is showing by BBP_PD in SRM EBP which sent by SRM SUS. But i am not able to view this invoice in Portal at the tracking of PO by Purchaser Login while before this i am able to view Purchase Order Response (POR) and Sus Confirmation sent by SUS to EBP in Portal at the tracking of PO by Purchaser Login.
Kindly suggest me what should i do to get Invoice at Portal sent by SUS to EBP at Portal.
Relative answers are really appreciable and will give full points for this.
Thanks.
Regards,
Pawan Keshwani
Edited by: pawankeshwani on Aug 14, 2011 9:21 AM
Edited by: pawankeshwani on Aug 14, 2011 9:24 AM

Hi,
As per standard Confirmation can be created from SUS for a EBP/SUS colloaboration.
In my current project, where both EBP & SUS are in same server with different clients.
We have been getting confirmations from the suppliers frequently without any issue.
Only issue is after getting the confifrmation details from SUS to EBP, we made a custom workflow to
send those detaisl again back to ECC with custom FM.
I hope the above information is clear and useful to you.
Thanks
Rajesh K

Confirmations/Invoices in EBP-SUS scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for