Confirming an order with a by-product

Am having a problem, If l confirm an order without a by-product an inspection lot is generated automatically and its post to inspection stock for Quality inspection, but the moment l try to confirm an order of the same product with a by-product it is posted to unrestricted-use stock but the material have 04 as its inspection lot origins in the material master. What can l do to post to inspection stock for this material with and without by-product.

Thanks a lot
I really agree with our solution because I also suspect that the problem can be valuation type 531 because for the other products am using 261, above all they all activate for Quality management in the material master data, but now the problem is am now not sure o the menu path so if the menu path is correct maybe l donu2019t know what am suppose to check for. So can you help me out if the manu path that am using is not correct. Spro>QM>Q inspection>inspection lot creation>inspection for goods mvt.
Thanks once again

Similar Messages

Confirming an order for a by product

Am having a problem, If l confirm an order without a by-product an inspection lot is generated automatically and its post to inspection stock for Quality inspection, but the moment l try to confirm an order of the same product with a by-product it is posted to unrestricted-use stock but the material have 04 as its inspection lot origins in the material master. What can l do to post to inspection stock for this material with and without by-product.

In SAP standard there is no problem when an order is confirmed with or without co-product.
If co-product should be post to inspection stock and be inspected, the inspection type '04' should be activated and selected 'post to insp. stock' indicator in material master of co-product.
I would suggest you check the material master and production order.
The co-product indicator is checked in MRP2 view of material master.
The quantity of product and co-product are negative(-) and the product is checked at co-product column in component overview of production order.
Regards
Luke

Exit to confirm transfer order with a storage unit number

hi guys,
I want to confirm transfer order with a storage unit number from LT06 transaction, somebody know a user exit? .. actuallly i am using MWMTO004 (EXIT_SAPLL03A_005) but it doesn´t confirm the transfer order, How can i solve it? give me suggestions.
Thanks in advance.
Marisol.
Edited by: Marisol on Apr 28, 2010 7:40 PM

I solved the problem myself.
Thanks.

Assemble-to-order with spliting the Production Order

Hello,
I'm new to SAP and we just implemented the SAP System.
My Experince is from one year as Process Owner for PP in our Project.
I have a specific Question regarding the assemble to order process.
So far we did not implemet Capacity Planning in the System, but I would like to use it.
The Idea is the following:
1. There is a sales order coming for 1pc of Product. The scheduling is carried out, ATP-Check and so on. The production order is created and at least the capa is placed on the end of the chain (using quetimes). One Product needs 60min to assemble.
2. more orders are comeing in, all consuming 60min of capa on that day. If the capa is used, move to later date until capa is back again. this also should be now Problem to set as far as I understand what I have learned already
3. What i do not like... If I get orders with too many qty.... I would like to hav a maximum qty. where the order gets splited and moved forward to the next day... so... Customer orders 10, 5 are placed on Tuesday, 5 on wednesday and so on.
Each of those "Splits" should have one production order header.
Any idea how I can reach that?
Thanks, hope I will find a solution
BR Marian

Marian,
Standard ERP Sales order ATP cannot be made to confirm Sales orders based on capacity availability. All capacity related conflicts and resolutions are done during dispatching, which is a separate step.
If you need SO ATP to consider available capacity while confirming the Sales order, you could use functionality that exists in APO. Otherwise, in ERP, you are facing custom development.
Assemble to order in general is restrictive as to what types of scheduling can be permitted. There is no automatic production order splitting in standard SAP ATO. Some manual manipulation is permitted. Of course, with custom development, you are only limted by your imagination.
Best Regards,
DB49

Confirm sales order with idoc ORDERS05

Hi everybody.
I´d like to know if it´s possible to confirm a sales orders with idoc ORDERS05 and message type ORDCHG and posting FM IDOC_INPUT_ORDCHG_VMI.
How would I have to fill the idoc data??
Thanks a lot

Hi,
For inbound idoc you can use the message Orders , process code ORDE and the function mdoule IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS to create a sales order.
Regards,
Nagaraj

Assembly to order: change in sales order with change in Production order

I want to activate change in the sales order data when a production order(which is created w.r.t the sales order) data is changed (Strategy 82 used); I have de-activated "No Update" for the corresponding requirement class 201; also the material for which SO created ,is not a part of any Delivery group.
But when I am changing the production order (date/qty.), SO isn't getting updated accoringly.
Please tell me the reason why it isn't happening!!

Hi
The sales order requirement can be made as the production order receipt once you save the order in the system.
so it is possible to change the receipt according to the sales order reqmt if any changes made in the sales order,
in every entry or changes in the sales order ( if you use the stategy 82) . in back end system explode the BOM and the create the production order as per the order reqmt,
even while you do the changes mad in the sales and save that time sytem re explode the BOM once again and change the production order qty.
but if you change the production order , system not re run or explode the BOM , Routing . such setting is not made in the system . so obviously updation will not happen for the sales order .
Edited by: raj on Jun 9, 2009 11:22 AM

Two Step Confirmation Transfer Order with Radiofrquency

Friends & Gurus.
Can I use 2 step confirmation with RF? Which transaction should I use? I can do it with regular SAP transactions, but as soon as I do it with RF transactions both Pick and Transfer are confirmed.
Thanks.
Solved, yes you can.
Edited by: albertiosis on Oct 3, 2008 2:48 PM

Hello Abhay Desai,
Please kindly refer to SAP Library which has provided the following documentation on 2-step picking:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/c6/f83e4d4afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
I would suggest you to go through the prerequisites and steps in 2-steps pikcing in the given documentation. You should also be able to access to above with the following path:
http://help.sap.com >> SAP Library
--> SAP ERP Central Component
       --> Logistics
            --> Logistic Execution
                 --> Warehouse Management System
                      --> Goods Issue
                           --> Two Step Picking.
Hope the above helps. If question answered, please close and reward points. Otherwise feel free to get back.

How to creat CS-order with config service product with own logic

Hi all,
I saw already different threads related to this topic, however no clear solution was given yet.
The scenario is:
Create from a notification list the service orders and determine in the background a correct service product which is configurable. Via an own logic the service product is found in a z-table and and the configuration is done via a seperate logic.
What would be the solution of the above scenario.
I already found some information in using:
CUCB_GET_CONFIGURATION
CUCB_SET_CONFIGURATION
CUCB_CONFIGURATION_TO_DB
But does this work?
How should the logical flow be in using these functionmdules.
We are using BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN to create the service order, however it is not allowed in this bapi to enter a service product which is configurable.
Thanks for your input in this.
Best regards,
Pascal

Also posted [here|http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=353731]
[Useful info|http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=53651]
PeteA

Confirming the order with material shortage

Dear all,
I am confirming the process order even though if material shortage.
Again when will consumption will take place for that particluar material?
Where that stock will be located without consumption?
Regards
Rajasekaran

Hi Rajasekaran,
stock is not present than it will go to cogi .please check the cogi.
if you don't want incorrect goods movement than choose following field as ticked in opk4 conformation dependent parameter
Thanks&Regards
Sandeep Kumar Praharaj

ATG10.1 - Unable to confirm an order with Order Discount type promotion

Hi,
I have created a promotion in ATG10.1. The promotion is an Order Discount type and i have configured a %off on the offer. Starting ATG10 we need to choose a template for configuring the promotion and then apply the rules and offer on it. I chose the Advanced condition and offer template and configured the rules and the offer.
Our requirement is to access the discountType property of the promotion applied on the order in a processor that gets executed in the processOrder pipeline. We have additional business logic in the processor depending on the discountType offered in the promotion. When we try to access the property we get an illegal argument exception. This is because the promotion that is being created is of super-type Order Discount whereas the discountType property is at the sub-type level.
We are accessing the property as below.
List<PricingAdjustment> pricingAdjustments = pOrder.getPriceInfo().getAdjustments();
for (PricingAdjustment pricingAdjustment : pricingAdjustments) {
RepositoryItem promotion = pricingAdjustment.getPricingModel();
String discountType = promotion.getPropertyValue("discountType");
Exception:
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Attempt to get a property value named discountType from item-descriptor type Order Discount
Any pointers or suggestions to fix this error would be helpful.
Thanks,
Srikanth

Yes, you are correct that discountType is defined at sub-type level. But if there is an entry in sub-type level, there is also an entry in the main "promotion" item-descriptor. PricingModel is nothing but main promotion repository item.
From the promotion ( pricingModel) repositoryItem, get the type ( type is a property defined at super level which says if this item is of type order discount, item dsicount or shipping discount. This type is not discountType ). Once you get the type value, call catalogRepository for that sub-type of promotion to get sub-type's repository item which contains the actual discountType.
From ATG 10 onwards, merchandising UI changed completely and sub types are not present. Templates are just for merchandising UI. But that should not effect your piece of code in the pipeline processors in processOrder pipeline chain. If you look at my above pseudo code, im getting the type, then querying catalog repository to get the sub-type repository item and then getting the discountType.
-karthik

Production order with multiple confirmations

Hi Experts,
Happy New Year.
We are having some production orders with multiple confirmations on different dates.
Our requirement is to capture individual confirmations as they posted.
Please any body look in to this.
It's urgent.
Thanks in advance.
Sri Sri

Got it guys
Table AFVC
With routing use field plnfl
Without routing use field aplfl.

Change of sales order in combination with planned/released production order

Hi Guru's,
How do you deal with changes in the sales order in combination with planned orders and the scenario how to deal with release production orders?
Can you tell me the SAP scenario, technically or reports or transactions or user exits, etc?
Thank you in advance,
Eric

Here You have 2 scenarios
1. Sales order changed at planned order stage
In this case any chagne of quantity done in the sales order level will be taken care by the Planned order until it was not firmed .
In case if it was firmed for the increased qty you will get a new planned order getting created.
In case if it is reduced and if it was unfirmed it will get changed accordingly
2. Sales order changed at production order stage
if the planned order was converted to production order change we can manually changes the respective Production order util no confirmation was done to any operations..
is all this scenariors you are looking for if it is helpful let me know
thanks..
dskumar

Closing the Production Order with status PCNF

Hi Experts,
May I kindly ask if I can close an order with status Partially confirmed? If not, how can I cancel the confirmation if I had already reversed the goods movement in the confirmation thereby flagging an error of a deficit in the material quantity during cancellation of the confirmation?
I really need your help since I need to close the production orders with this case.
Hoping so much for your replies.
Many thanks in advance.
Sincerely,
Ria

Ria,
I am not so clear about the exact situation.
When you say you have reversed the goods movement with MIGO, is it reversal of the documents posted with confirmation or the individual documents?
You can only cancle the document with MIGO which are independent of the confirmation.
The documents which are with the confirmation can not be reversed in any case with MIGO.
I suggets you go this way,
1. Check why system is giving you error as 'Deficit......'. The one thing I suspect that you must have performed auto GR & moved out the stock of FG from that location.
If it's so then bring back the stock to it's original location & cancel the confirmation.
While cancelling the confirmation where you might have executed goods issue with backflush this error won't arise as the stock will be bring back to storage location form the order.
Don't reverse the cancellation of the of the documents youhave performed with MIGO for independent material posting on the order. Keep it as it is.
This way the cancellation of confirmation & material movement will be done & now cost on the order will be zero.
You can assign the status CLSD as well as DLFL to the order.
2. In case you find the above activities can not be carried out for some reason then give status TECO to the order.
Sttle the order so that the cost on the order will be zero, then give status CLSD.
As far as possible stick to solution no. 1 only.
Go for solution no. 2 when you don't have any other option.
Hope this helps you.
SmanS

WIP status (RESA) not updated for process order with co-product

Hi,
We are facing the scenario below, please confirm whether item 2 behaviour is standard SAP.
1. Process order with settlement rule MAT - after WIP calculated, status RESA is updated & FI document it posted.
2. Process order with settlement rule OIT (co-product) - after WIP calculated, status RESA not updated & FI document posted.
Thank you.

Self found answer

Variance calculation for production order with settlement receiver as SDI

Hi...
I have one query reference to Variance calculation for production order with settlement receiver as SDI(Sales document item).
I am working on Varaint configuration with strategy 25(Make-to-order for configurable material) with requirement class 046.
I have created sales order ref. to configurable material,subsequently created planned order & then converted to production order.
In production order settlement receiver is SDI(Sales document item).
While doing production confirmation ,variance has been created.
Now during variance calculation KKS2, I have got error message as no suitable settlement rule found for object Order no.
Is there any way to come out of this?Or variance calculation KKS2 is not applicable with settlement receiver as SDI(Sales document item).
Pl. guide
Redards
Tushar

Hi
In case of non valuated material, concept of variance does not apply...
Variance is Actual Cost - Cost of Goods receipt posted in stock.. If the later value is zero, your entire actual cost is variance... That is one way of saying it
But, in SAP, var not calculated in case of non valuated material and that makes sense as well.. Since you are in MTO scenario, it would make sense to analyse costs vs revenues @ sale order level as each SO will be unique in itself
Regards
Ajay M

Confirming an order with a by-product

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for