Confirming Process "Locks Up"

I'm restoring a project to Premiere Pro CS3.
As the confirming audio process is running, one of the clips in my project (a 4 second SD AVI clip) has stopped the process - the blue bar at the bottom isn't even moving.
Is there any way to skip the conforming of this audio clip?
FOO

FYI - As a quick workaround I have unlinked this clip - the rest of the clips audio are conforming. I still need to figure out why this one wasn't working correctly...

Similar Messages

Confirm process order problem

hi
I configure IMG settings under OPK1 for porcess order..I check "imediately proposal" for quantity/service..But when I use COR6N to confirm process order, the duration field is not proposed...Where should I configure in IMG?
btw,is there any T-code like COHV in discrete planning to mass confirm process orders?thanks..

Dear Monst,
Ensure whether have you made this setting for the standard profile in OPK1 under default tab page check whether for quantity
and services whether for the value is set as 1 - immediate proposal.
check with this and revert back.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

LUW data for smq2--Error During Delivery: Ibound processing locked

Hi all,
There are lot of messages(more than 7000) stucked in d Inbound queues, as viewed by SMQ2, and are in the retry mode for long.
In the LUW data the status of the queue is showing error during delivery and the error text is <b>Inbound Processing Locked for example Deadline Processing </b>
can anyone please suggest what this problem is about and suggstions for removing this problem will be really appreciated.
This is urgent as the problem is in production.
Regards,
Rookie.

Hi Prateek,
The BPM involved is a dicesion making BPM which is creting large Idocs.
We have checked in SM12 and the messages are locked there. Can you please advice how can we unlock the messages from SM12.

Confirmation process in SRM does not work whenever there is a discrepancy

Hello,
we are on SRM 5.0 version with classic scenario(follow on documents in backed system - ECC 5.0). to procure maintainence service user cretes a shopping cart by selecting describe requirements method and UOM at times in incorrectly asssigned as EA so upon shopping cart approval a follow on ducument (purchase requistion) is created in ECC as per config set up(in SRM). Buyer while coverting this purchase requisition to PO rectifies this erroe and chages the UOM of meausre to Hr and send a PO to vendor.
we are not bale to use confirmation feature in SRM to perform receipt of this service. is this how system works? any configration or a BADI needs to be usd to allow to perform confirmation in SRM even tough there is discrepancy in shopping cart UOM and Purcahse requsition UOM.
when thre is change in UOM in ECC that Purchase
*Confirmation process in SRM does not work whenever there is a discrepancy (i.e. different UM )between Shoping cart and Purchase Requisition related to that Shoping cart.*
we donot use serive option in SRM and donnot MM service module in ECC.
any help on this will be much appreciated.
Thanks,
sairam

The Reset Firefox feature can fix many issues by restoring Firefox to its factory default state while saving your essential information.
Note: ''This will cause you to lose any Extensions, Open websites, and some Preferences.''
To Reset Firefox do the following:
#Go to Firefox > Help > Troubleshooting Information.
#Click the "Reset Firefox" button.
#Firefox will close and reset. After Firefox is done, it will show a window with the information that is imported. Click Finish.
#Firefox will open with all factory defaults applied.
Further information can be found in the [[Reset Firefox – easily fix most problems]] article.
Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!

Account Determination - Delivery Order Confirmation Process

Hi Experts,
How the Account determination will happen in the Delivery Order Confirmation process. Is the any Account determination analysis tool available to check the same ?
Regards
Prasath

Hi prashanth
Revenue account determination is the place where SD- FI integration takes place
What ever we do in the revenue account determination (t.code VKOA)Generally for every condition type in our pricing procedure we assign account keys wheather it is freight , tax etc
Now in revenue account determination , to those account keys we assign G/L accounts.
Now when you do billing , some condition types will come in the billing document . and once you save the billing document those amounts will be flowing to the respective account key G/L accounts
to FI people
say for example if for MWST account key is MWS , in billing if this MWST condition type comes and once you save the billing document then the tax amount will be flowing to the MWS G/L account .and FI people will look into it
Once you save the billing document automatically a accounting document and controlling document gets generated
Now after Post Goods Issue , we save the delivery document here the SD - MM integration takes place
Once you do PGI , automatically the G/L accounts get updated and the valuation level comes down. So after doing PGI system generated material document and controlling document.
Regards
Srinath

Confirmation process of an Employee in Oracle Apps HRMS

Hi,
How is the confirmation process handled in HRMS when the employee completes the probation period?
Regards,
Puja
Edited by: user12197347 on Jan 18, 2011 4:59 AM
Edited by: user12197347 on Jan 18, 2011 4:59 AM

Hello,
How u distinguishing your employees who are confirmed and those who are in probation period ?
Once probation period is end (defined in assignment --> Probation tab) then either one of the following can be happen:
1. Employee got confirmed
2. Probation extended
3. Employee got terminated
Any action can be fired using a custom concurrent program.
Thanks
Ayaz

Did Infocube compression process locks the infocube?

HI All,
First of all thanks for ur active support and co-operation.
Did the compression process locks the cube?, my doubt is, while the compression process is running on a cube, if i try to load data into the same cube, will it allow or not? please reply me as soon as u can.
Many Thanks in Advance.
Jagadeesh.

hi,
Compression: It is a process used to delete the Request IDs and this saves space.
When and why use infocube compression in real time?
InfoCube compression creates new cube by eliminating duplicates. Compressed infocubes require less storage space and are faster for retrieval of information. Here the catch is .. Once you compress, you can't alter the InfoCube. You are safe as long as you don't have any error in modeling.
This compression can be done through Process Chain and also manually.
Check these Links:
http://www.sap-img.com/business/infocube-compression.htm
compression is done to increase the performance of the cube...
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/ca/aa6437e7a4080ee10000009b38f842/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/b2/e91c3b85e6e939e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Infocube compression and aggregate compression are mostly independent.
Usually if you decide to keep the requests in the infocube, you can compress the aggregates. If you need to delete a request, you just have to rebuild an aggregate, if it is compressed. Therefore there are no problems in compressing aggregates, unless the rebuild of the aggregates take a lot of time.
It does not make sense to compress the infocube without compressing the aggregates. The idea behind compressing is to speed up the infocube access by adding up all the data of the different requests. As a result you get rid of the request number. All other attributes stay the same. If you have more than one record per set of characteristics, the key figures will add the key figures by aggregat characteristic (ADD, MIN, MAX etc.). This will reduce the number of records in the cube.
Example:
requestid date 0material 0amount
12345 20061201 3333 125
12346 20061201 3333 -125
12346 20061201 3333 200
will result to
requestid date 0material 0amount
20061201 3333 200
In this case 2 records are saved.
But once the requestid is lost (due to compression) you cannot get it back.
Therefore, once you compressed the infocube, there is no sense in keeping the aggregates uncompressed. But as long as your Infocube is uncompressed you can always compress the aggregates, without any problem other than rebuild time of the aggregates.
hope it helps..

Is there a mass transaction for deleting processing locks

Using trx FPLKDEL will not help, because the locks were not set using FKLOCK2.

Hi,
You can also try FPE2M for deleting processing locks at item document level. The limitaion of this code is that the documents should have the same " Due by date".
You can also do some config if you need specific screnn layout as well.
Let me know if this helps.
Regards,
Lalitha

Predefined Confirmation Process

Hi All,
I have come across a new transaction CO1P. Could you please tell me what is this Predefined confirmation process.
What data does appear in this transaction.
When I tried to cancel the confirmation an error message got displayed "There are future records for this confirmation".System suggested me to go to CO1P and resolve the error.

Hi,
Refer the following links,
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/e3/7cd32396f611d1b5a60000e8359890/frameset.htm
Entries in CO1P
Hope this helps you.
SmanS

Creation of Vendors by batch jobs: Bypass the 'confirmation' process

Hello,
Need your kind suggestions please. When we create a vendor master data it's a two step process. In the first place we create and save it. In the second step a different user needs to log in and confirm the same before the vendor gets active in the system.
Now, our client usually have to create a huge load of vendors on a regular basis. So they want to automate this process by creating the vendors using a background job. Since the vendors would be created by the batch job, security issues would automatically be taken care of.
Therefore they want to avoid the second step of 'confirming' the vendors to get them 'active' in the system.
Is it possible to bypass the 'confirm' procedure so that no one has to log in and keep confirming the huge number of vendors that would need to be created?
Please advice. if you need more information, please let me know and I would try to answer as far as my knowledge goes.
Regards,
Suvarghya

Hi,
Go to the following path,
IMG >> Financial Accounting >> Accounts Recievables and Accounts Payable >> Vendor Accounts >> Master Data >> Preparations for Creating Vendor Master Data >> Define sensitive Fields for Dual Controls (Vendors).
Click that activity, and delete all the fields that exists which makes it not necessary to confirm any of the vendors when they are created/made a change.
Good Luck,
SAP Solutioning

How to find which process locked the directory

I have a folder with some TFS-projects. So now i want to rename or move my directory, it says that "the action can't be completed because
thefolder or a file in
it is open in another program". So i downloaded "Process Explorer", ctrl+f, entered directory name, but it found nothing. I
thought that files used are presented by full names, eg C:\SomeDir\SmthElse\...

Hi,
You can check with:
1. MMC - Shared Folders (if it is a shared folder). Here you could check Open Files to see if files are locked by other users with opening a file in your folder. You can kill the session to unlock a file.
2. Download this tool:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/bb896655.aspx
Handle.exe could help check locking session on your computer. See if your file in that folder is listed and use -c to close the handle.
If you have any feedback on our support, please send to [email protected]

Confirmed Process order but with mistake on quantity for material.

Dear All,
The case is , User make mistake on putting large volume into material quantity within process order, However, this process order has been released , confirmed and delivery (DLV) status.
Since this large vquantity material will make the Cost extra larger than normal.
Therefore, is there way to change material quantity and recalcuate the cost again?
Many thanks !
Marco

Dear all,
After commuicated with User again, user has been done as below.
Step1)
User has been cancel the process order confirmation by T-code: CORS,
Step2)
Revesed the extra amount Quantity to Block stock to prevent Sales Person touch this extra quantity.
However, I checked there is no different on Actual costs after the cancel the Process order confirmation.
I have some confusing now..
1) is that once Process order confirmation cancelled, is that there Must no Actual cost in Accounting view?
2) If there is part of physical product produced, but the Process order has been cancelled afterward. How the cost calcuated? is that include the cost or exclude the cost?
Many Thanks for your help!
Best Regards
Marco

SRM SUS - confirmations process

Hello,
I have 2 questions, hoping you can provide help:
Question 1 - when supplier confirms the purchase order in SUS, is it possible for the supplier to go back into the purchase order and re-confirm order for different delivery dates or quantities (e.g. put back into "in process"). Currently the supplier is only able to do the ASN as the next step
Question 2 - is it possible for the supplier todo confirmations for schedule agreement releases, e.g. like we do for purchase orders? Currently supplier has "new" and "in process" status, and there is no collaboration on delivery dates and quantities back to the SAP R/3 system
We are using SRM v7 and SAP R/3 4.6c (and SAP PI)
Thanks

Hi Azam
It won't be possible for suppliers to change the PO response that they have entered initially.
Normally the PO response would go to SRM for approval by the buyer. If the buyer doesn't accept the POR they may send back and then the suppliers can enter a new one.
However if it is approved by buyer or Auto-approved( as in our case), suppliers won't be able to change that.
I imagine that it would be a complex development to change this behavior
Regards
Kedar

Co11n confirmation process

Dear All
Our client scenario is
5 different work centers ex mill01, mill02,.. mil05.(same process)
production order created for only on work center mill01.
while confirming the order in CO11n we have provision to change the
workcenter where actual prod happened, operator manually changing the
workcenter and doing confirmation. if he forgot to change the workcenter,
While press enter system automatically takes the prd order workcenter ex mill01.
and showing msg
"Actual or planned work center is adopted from operation/operation element."
client need control, that system should not take automatically the default
workcenter, it should ask for actual workcenter.
how han we do this in config. any possible way in OPK4 tcode?
please put light on this
regards
vinoth

Hi,
Your purpose cant be served with OPK4.First of all, you maintain 5 routings for comprising 5 different machines for same material.
Then You need to make following setting in OPL8 ( Order type dependent parameters) :
Select your Plant & order type , Under Planning tab maintain Routing selection as
7 Routing mandatory (manual selection)
By maintaining above setting, when creation of order ( either in CO01 or thr conversion of planned order) system will propose to choose alternate routing out of 5 routings you have made 5 different machines.You need to choose routing as per your requirement of mill.You can maintain mill name in routing description so that you can identify mill while choosing routing.
Due to above practice, your required machine will be copied in Production Order only so you need not change it manually while confirmation in CO11N / CO15.
Try above and revert in case any doubt.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Tejas

Quick way to confirm process 2012 choice for older images?

I searched, but nothing came up.
When LR4.x sees an older image it shows me the exclamation mark. OK, yes I will be updating... so the next step is a side by side. I could skip this, but it can be interesting to see where the subtle differeces will be. I know about the backslash key as a way to close the side-by-side. Up to today it always closed the *old* (2010) version and I sailed off into whatever editing was needed.
Today the backslash is always placing me in the older version "Before". ...as if I chosen "do not update"? ...but I *did* click "Update".
My LR4 book (M. Evening). which I generally like, was written before the interface got locked down as there are some inconsistencies even with 4.0, so looking there I find nothing that works on this exact flow of events.
What am I doing "wrong" for the 4.3 interface. Hmmm, I just updated from 4.2 and that's when LR started leaving me in the old process.
jonathan7007

Hey, web-weaver, yes, my 4.2 (Win7 64-bit) always used to... but today the first time an older image came up after updating to v4.3 last night I couldn't be sure what I was working with! turned out the program just went to "Before" I will have to keep testing but I have to get some real work done so had to put this aside...
Yeah, it used to be that way.
edit: did it again.
jonathan7007

Confirming Process "Locks Up"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for