Confused with W3C validation results

Ok so i've had problems with this page (please see below), adapting it to respond to any size device. I was advised to start off by tidying up the errors on the W3C validator. I have reduced the errors right down but am having big problems with the error shown below.  I have tried removing all the dl elements from each picture/element and leaving just the one containing the whole section but its still not right.
Can anyone please help me resolve it?
Line 462, Column 4: Element dl is missing a required child element.
<dd>  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_0" onclick="Recalcula…
www.milesfunerals.com/estimator.php

Ok so i've applied my unordered list. (please see below) and i applied the CSS like you suggest. Now how do i get the pictures to sit side by side in rows of two's down the page? Do i need to apply a float left and right to each <li> element or is there an easier way? This is what it currently looks like (www.milesfunerals.com/estimator.php) and this is the layout i need to acheive (www.milesfunerals.com/estimator.html).
  <ul>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_0" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="-190" />
                </li>
                <li> Basic Simple Coffin (- £190)</li>
                <li><span class="dropdownmenu" id="CAT_Custom_00010" name="CAT_Custom_00010" onchange="Recalculate()"><select name="CAT_Custom_00010" class="dropdownmenu" id="CAT_Custom_00010" onchange="Recalculate()">
                  <option selected="selected" value="0">-- Select additional services --</option>
                  <option value="225" >Limousine (&pound;225)</option>
                  <option value="200">Chapel visiting (&pound;200)</option>
                  <option value="120">Choice of date & time (&pound;120)</option>
                  <option value="425" >Limousine,Chapel visiting (&pound;425)</option>
                  <option value="345" >Limousine,Choice of date & time (&pound;345)</option>
                  <option value="320">Chapel visiting, Choice of date & time (&pound;320)</option>
                  <option value="545" >Limousine,Chapel visiting, Choice of date & time (&pound;545)</option>
                  </select></span>
                  <img src="images/The_Elgar.jpg" alt="Elgar" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Elgar_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height=400 ')"></li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_4" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="260" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Elgar (£260)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Gladstone.jpg" alt="Gladstone" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Gladstone_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height =400')"> </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_5" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="360" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Gladstone (£360)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Drake.jpg" alt="Drake" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Drake_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height=400 ')">  </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_3" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="435" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext"> The Drake (£435)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Byron.jpg" alt="Byron" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Byron_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height=400 ')"> </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_1" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="500" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Byron (£500)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Churchill.jpg" alt="Churchill" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Churchill_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height =400')"></li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_2" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="560" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Churchill (£560)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Nelson.jpg" alt="Nelson" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Nelson_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height=40 0')"> </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_7" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="630" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Nelson (£630)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Dickens.jpg" alt="Dickens" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Dickens_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height=4 00')"> </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_12" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="1060" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Dickens (£1060)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Wellington.jpg" alt="Wellington" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Wellington_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,heigh t=400')"> </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_11" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="2160" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Wellington (£2160)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Victoria.jpg" alt="Victoria" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Victoria_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height= 400')">   </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_10" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="1060" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Victoria (£1060)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/colourful.jpg" alt="Colourful" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/colourfulcopy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height=400' )">  </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_13" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="660" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext"> The Colourful (£660)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Nightingale.jpg" alt="Nightingale" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Nightingale_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,heig ht=400')"> </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_8" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="630" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Nightingale (£630)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Pankhurst.jpg" alt="Pankhurst" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Pankhurst_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,height =400')">   </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_9" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="610" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Pankhurst (£610)</span></li>
                <li><img src="images/The_Montgomery.jpg" alt="Montgomery" class="coffinpic" width="150" height="68" onClick="MM_openBrWindow('images/The_Montgomery_copy.jpg','','toolbar=yes,width=800,heigh t=400')">  </li>
                <li>
                  <input name="CAT_Custom_76926" id="CAT_Custom_76926_6" onclick="Recalculate()" type="radio" value="2260" />
                  <span class="estimatorsmalltext">The Montgomery (£2260)</span></li>
              </ul>

Similar Messages

  • h:form with W3C validation failure

    Hi gurus,
    I tried to validate my JSF page against W3C validation rules. However, each <h:form> in my page creates a hidden field as:
    "+<input type="hidden" name="javax.faces.ViewState" id="javax.faces.ViewState" value="j_id14:j_id15" />+"
    with same id and value, so as a result, i can't pass the validation.
    So could anyone has a suggestion on this problem?
    BTW, i found some threads suggest to use a "giant" h:form for the entire page, and clearly this is not the answer i am looking for.
    Thanks in advance!

    Yep, it's a known issue.
    I've attempted fixes in the RI in the past, however due to potential reliance on the presence of both
    fields for AJAX libraries+JSF, it's left as is.

  • Menu problem with w3c validator

    DW CS5.5
    When I test a php page with a select menu in the w3c validator, I get the following error message on each element within it:
    The select element cannot have more than one selected option descendant unless the multiple attribute is specified. [HTML5]
    Whether selected as a menu or a list, it still appears. I was under the impression that you only select one item from a list unless you check "allow multiple" and I only need one item to be selected.
    The list or menu displays and works properly, selecting one item as required.
    Is this a validator error or is there something wrong with my DW generated code? - shown as a list in this case:

    Most containers have their own XML parsing JAR's. You do not want to normally remove these (as they parse XML deployment and configuration files). However, you can add your own XML parsing JAR files to WEB-INF/lib.
    - Saish

  • Help sought with W3C Validation issue

    In order to place text from a database accurately in a cell I have used:
    <span class="cont_layer">
    <?php echo $row_restSelect['cel_blb'];  // Insert Details from dbase ?>
    </span>
    However, I am using tinyMCE at the input interface for the MYSQL database and tinyMCE puts in tags like <p> all over the place, so the output looks something like this:
    <span class="cont_layer"><p>Some text.<br /> Some more text. <br /> <br /> And a bit more text.</p></span>
    This works fine in practice, but I notice that W3C Validation rejects the structure with:
    "document type does not allow element "p" here; missing one of "object", "applet", "map", "iframe", "button", "ins", "del" start-tag"
    I am using XHTML Transitional.
    Is there a way around this, or should I just stop being so anal about validation?

    A <span> is for inline elements and cannot contain block-level elements, such as paragraphs. Replace your <span> with a <div> and all will be hunky-dory.
    <div class="cont_layer">
    <?php echo $row_restSelect['cel_blb'];  // Insert Details from dbase ?>
    </div>

  • Is anyone having problems with the w3c validator killing Dreamweaver

    CS5.5 on win7 64bit is my system.
    If I try to validate a PHP page in live view, most times the validator works fine.
    If there is an error, and I click on the line number to find the error location, edit the file and close the validator window, I get a short fat barber's pole in blue and white on the bottom right of my screen, or sometimes a long thin one at the top right.
    The following message appears:
    >>>>>>>>>
    Server not found
    The page
    "http://localhost (path to page) was not loaded because Dreamweaver could not find the server "localhost". Please make sure that you are connected to the internet and the server name is correct.
    >>>>>>>>>
    On other occasions, the following  message appears after using the validator:
    >>>>>>>>>
    path to filename      The request to the W3C service has timed out. The service or your Internet connection appears to be down.
    My Internet connection is fine, and if I click on the w3c button again it validates with no problem.
    >>>>>>>>>
    When the first message appears, Dreamweaver becomes unstable and hangs, the only solution is to restart the program, after which everything works fine - including the validator, until it finds another error and the whole thing starts over again.
    CS5.5 on win7 64bit is my system.
    Is anyone else having problems like this with the validator?

    Try this: http://forums.adobe.com/message/2796075

  • Problems producing W3C-valid template-built pages

    Folks:
    DW CS3 on Intel Mac
    CMX Design-Time Extension
    I would like my site to pass the W3C markup validator,
    http://validator.w3.org/.
    My site design is straightforward: I've got a single
    custom-built template page, "index.php" for the layout of my site.
    There's no content in this file. The header of this file contains a
    link to my site's single master CSS style-sheet.
    All content comes from one of over 100 html "contact-chunk"
    files, each of which contains only "bare" HTML, no header or
    trailer material at all, no <!DOCTYPE...> nor <html>
    ... <head> ... </head> ... <body> ..
    </body> stuff at all. One of these contact-chunk files is
    included at each page-load. The details are not important.
    Wait, I lied: Each of those contact-chunk files contains a
    bare link to the site's master CSS style-sheet, like this:
    <link href="/TheMasterStyleSheet.css" rel="stylesheet"
    type="text/css">
    "Bare", meaning NOT enclosed by <head> ...
    </head> or anything else. DW requires just the link so it can
    detect the site-wide style-sheet and let me apply styles from it to
    the "content-chunk" files.
    When complete pages are served to clients, that extra link
    would ordinarily mean the browser would see two different external
    style-sheet links from the composite page at load-time, which is is
    not allowed. This is in fact flagged as an error by W3C validator.
    There is no sense in giving browsers known-invalid code! It
    makes total sense to me that links to external styles-sheets need
    to occur just once,in the header of such composites as they are
    seen by browsers. It also makes sense to me that the contact chunk
    files could not contain <html> ... <head> ...
    </head> ... <body> .. </body> tags because these
    would be nested within the <body>... </body? structure in
    the template page. Confusion!
    Thanks to the DW designers, there's a way to avoid sending
    the second style-sheet link: DW's Design-Time Style-Sheet mechanism
    allows me declare specific style-sheet links as Design-Time ONLY;
    the specified links are stripped before the files are uploaded. DW
    CS3 supports only page-by-page declarations, But with the
    minimal-cost "CMX Design-time" extension (
    http://www.communitymx.com/abstract.cfm?CID=61265)
    added, I can make these declarations on a site-wide basis. Cool!
    All the above seems quite reasonable and how-it-must-be for
    template-include designs. However,I have found two problems:
    1. The Design-Time Style Sheet Mechanism works unpredictably
    When I tell the CMX Design-time Extension to exclude my
    master CSS style-sheet link from all .html files, site-wide, it
    apparently does what it is required to make this happen: it creates
    .mno files in _notes folders corresponding to all .html files in
    the source tree. (The only files with .html extensions in my source
    tree are such content-chunk files.) Without the extension, I'd end
    up with identical files after manually applying Text--> CSS
    Styles -->Design-Time individually to all the content-chunk
    files.
    I did have some successful test runs on individual content
    chunk files, so I know the Design-Time Mechanism is fundamentally
    sound.
    Yes, I am certain I re-PUT all the .html files to the server
    to allow the specified CSS link in each to be stripped. There is
    only one external style-sheet, and I'm certain I specified that
    one. Yes, I looked in the DW and extension documentation for
    additional information.
    2. This Design-Time Style Sheet mechanism is completely
    ineffective for embedded styles in content-chunk files..
    I think embedded styles are completely legal, and make
    perfect sense when particular styles are needed only for one source
    file. A few of my contact-chunk files contain these.
    My questions:
    Question 1: How to assure that the DW Design-Time mechanism
    is activated and works consistently? Or how to debug it? What
    exactly should appear in the _notes/*.mno files?
    Question 2: Assuming both my development machine and the
    server are running Unix, is there any downside to picking a
    distinctive extension for content-chunk files? Any standard? How
    about ".ihtml" e.g., "foo.ihtml"?
    Question 3: Is there any alternative that preserves embedded
    styles in my design? (I think it is inevitable that I'll need to
    move my local styles to the master CSS style-sheet or use in-line
    styles. I'm just checking in case I've missed a clever
    alternative.)
    Question 4: I'm doing a lot of work to make this design work
    with site-wide CSS, and each time I solve one issue, another one
    pops up. In my experience, that pattern either means I'm trying to
    use a subtle, complex mechanism, which simply takes a while to get
    right. Or that I've committed a fundamental design error, and
    there's possibly a much easier way to accomplish the same result.
    Which?
    TIA,
    Henry
    TIA,
    Henry

    > "Bare", meaning NOT enclosed by <head> ...
    </head> or anything else.
    > DW
    > requires just the link so it can detect the site-wide
    style-sheet and let
    > me
    > apply styles from it to the "content-chunk" files.
    Won't work. The chunks are going in the body. Links to
    stylesheets in the
    body are invalid HTML and ignored by the browsers.
    > When complete pages are served to clients, that extra
    link would
    > ordinarily
    > mean the browser would see two different external
    style-sheet links from
    > the
    > composite page at load-time, which is is not allowed.
    This is in fact
    > flagged
    > as an error by W3C validator.
    This makes no sense. A page can have oodles of links to
    external
    stylesheets, but they must all be in the head of the page.
    > 1. The Design-Time Style Sheet Mechanism works
    unpredictably
    Perhaps it's more accurate to say that the CMX extension
    works unpredictably
    with DT Stylesheets. I've never seen an instance of DT
    stylesheets failing,
    either in my hands or in anyone else's. Your report is the
    first. I think
    CMX will have to help you with this one.
    > 2. This Design-Time Style Sheet mechanism is completely
    ineffective for
    > embedded styles in content-chunk files..
    >
    > I think embedded styles are completely legal, and make
    perfect sense when
    > particular styles are needed only for one source file. A
    few of my
    > contact-chunk files contain these.
    Nope - embedded styles are illegal in this sense.
    > Question 2: Assuming both my development machine and the
    server are
    > running
    > Unix, is there any downside to picking a distinctive
    extension for
    > content-chunk files? Any standard? How about ".ihtml"
    e.g.,
    > "foo.ihtml"?
    Nope. You could use 'monkeybutt' if you wanted. However, if
    you want DW
    to recognize that extension as containing HTML code you would
    need to
    'register' it with DW -
    http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=tn_16410&sliceId=1
    > Question 3: Is there any alternative that preserves
    embedded styles in my
    > design? (I think it is inevitable that I'll need to move
    my local styles
    > to
    > the master CSS style-sheet or use in-line styles. I'm
    just checking in
    > case
    > I've missed a clever alternative.)
    Yes, you can give each "chunk" chunk-specific container
    names, and place the
    desired chunk-specific CSS selectors in the parent CSS.
    > Question 4: I'm doing a lot of work to make this design
    work with
    > site-wide
    > CSS, and each time I solve one issue, another one pops
    up. In my
    > experience,
    > that pattern either means I'm trying to use a subtle,
    complex mechanism,
    > which
    > simply takes a while to get right. Or that I've
    committed a fundamental
    > design
    > error, and there's possibly a much easier way to
    accomplish the same
    > result.
    > Which?
    The latter, I believe.
    Murray --- ICQ 71997575
    Adobe Community Expert
    (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
    ==================
    http://www.projectseven.com/go
    - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
    Tutorials & Resources
    ==================
    "hen3ry" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Folks:
    >
    > DW CS3 on Intel Mac
    > CMX Design-Time Extension
    >
    > I would like my site to pass the W3C markup validator,
    >
    http://validator.w3.org/.
    >
    > My site design is straightforward: I've got a single
    custom-built
    > template
    > page, "index.php" for the layout of my site. There's no
    content in this
    > file.
    > The header of this file contains a link to my site's
    single master CSS
    > style-sheet.
    >
    > All content comes from one of over 100 html
    "contact-chunk" files, each of
    > which contains only "bare" HTML, no header or trailer
    material at all, no
    > <!DOCTYPE...> nor <html> ... <head>
    ... </head> ... <body> .. </body>
    > stuff
    > at all. One of these contact-chunk files is included at
    each page-load.
    > The
    > details are not important.
    >
    > Wait, I lied: Each of those contact-chunk files contains
    a bare link to
    > the
    > site's master CSS style-sheet, like this:
    >
    > <link href="/TheMasterStyleSheet.css"
    rel="stylesheet"
    > type="text/css">
    >
    > "Bare", meaning NOT enclosed by <head> ...
    </head> or anything else.
    > DW
    > requires just the link so it can detect the site-wide
    style-sheet and let
    > me
    > apply styles from it to the "content-chunk" files.
    >
    > When complete pages are served to clients, that extra
    link would
    > ordinarily
    > mean the browser would see two different external
    style-sheet links from
    > the
    > composite page at load-time, which is is not allowed.
    This is in fact
    > flagged
    > as an error by W3C validator.
    >
    > There is no sense in giving browsers known-invalid code!
    It makes total
    > sense to me that links to external styles-sheets need to
    occur just
    > once,in the
    > header of such composites as they are seen by browsers.
    It also makes
    > sense
    > to me that the contact chunk files could not contain
    <html> ... <head> ...
    > </head> ... <body> .. </body> tags
    because these would be nested within
    > the
    > <body>... </body? structure in the template
    page. Confusion!
    >
    > Thanks to the DW designers, there's a way to avoid
    sending the second
    > style-sheet link: DW's Design-Time Style-Sheet mechanism
    allows me
    > declare
    > specific style-sheet links as Design-Time ONLY; the
    specified links are
    > stripped before the files are uploaded. DW CS3 supports
    only page-by-page
    > declarations, But with the minimal-cost "CMX
    Design-time" extension
    > (
    http://www.communitymx.com/abstract.cfm?CID=61265)
    added, I can make
    > these
    > declarations on a site-wide basis. Cool!
    >
    > All the above seems quite reasonable and how-it-must-be
    for
    > template-include
    > designs. However,I have found two problems:
    >
    > 1. The Design-Time Style Sheet Mechanism works
    unpredictably
    >
    > When I tell the CMX Design-time Extension to exclude my
    master CSS
    > style-sheet link from all .html files, site-wide, it
    apparently does what
    > it is
    > required to make this happen: it creates .mno files in
    _notes folders
    > corresponding to all .html files in the source tree.
    (The only files with
    > .html extensions in my source tree are such
    content-chunk files.) Without
    > the
    > extension, I'd end up with identical files after
    manually applying Text-->
    > CSS
    > Styles -->Design-Time individually to all the
    content-chunk files.
    >
    > I did have some successful test runs on individual
    content chunk files, so
    > I
    > know the Design-Time Mechanism is fundamentally sound.
    >
    > Yes, I am certain I re-PUT all the .html files to the
    server to allow the
    > specified CSS link in each to be stripped. There is only
    one external
    > style-sheet, and I'm certain I specified that one. Yes,
    I looked in the DW
    > and
    > extension documentation for additional information.
    >
    >
    > 2. This Design-Time Style Sheet mechanism is completely
    ineffective for
    > embedded styles in content-chunk files..
    >
    > I think embedded styles are completely legal, and make
    perfect sense when
    > particular styles are needed only for one source file. A
    few of my
    > contact-chunk files contain these.
    >
    > My questions:
    >
    > Question 1: How to assure that the DW Design-Time
    mechanism is activated
    > and
    > works consistently? Or how to debug it? What exactly
    should appear in
    > the
    > _notes/*.mno files?
    >
    > Question 2: Assuming both my development machine and the
    server are
    > running
    > Unix, is there any downside to picking a distinctive
    extension for
    > content-chunk files? Any standard? How about ".ihtml"
    e.g.,
    > "foo.ihtml"?
    >
    > Question 3: Is there any alternative that preserves
    embedded styles in my
    > design? (I think it is inevitable that I'll need to move
    my local styles
    > to
    > the master CSS style-sheet or use in-line styles. I'm
    just checking in
    > case
    > I've missed a clever alternative.)
    >
    > Question 4: I'm doing a lot of work to make this design
    work with
    > site-wide
    > CSS, and each time I solve one issue, another one pops
    up. In my
    > experience,
    > that pattern either means I'm trying to use a subtle,
    complex mechanism,
    > which
    > simply takes a while to get right. Or that I've
    committed a fundamental
    > design
    > error, and there's possibly a much easier way to
    accomplish the same
    > result.
    > Which?
    >
    > TIA,
    >
    > Henry
    >
    > TIA,
    >
    > Henry
    >
    >

  • Can't get a web page to validate with meta tags with w3c??

    I have created a website for my school projects, and every week I have to add something to it for the course, and every monday I have to submit my code in a zipped folder to the professor, after running it through the w3c validation page, and passing, This current week, I was instructed to swork on SEO for my site, and add meta tags to the site to fish for traffic, and then I have to validate it through w3c and submit. Well, I did not complete this because w3c would not validate my page until I removed every single meta tag from the code, and I cannot for the life of me understand the error that is holding me back. So, in an effort to see if I could get some help here, I have included my code, and will try to explain what is happening and the code as well as the error from the validator service. Please have a look, help me, because I am totally lost here....
    Thanks in advance!!
    zlloyd1
    This is my code:
    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
    <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
    <title>zlloyd on the web</title><meta name="" content="Zachariah Lloyd, basketball, computers" /><meta fttp-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
    <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="stylez.css" />
    </head>
    <body><div id="container"><h1>ZLLOYD ON THE WEB</h1> <div id="navbar"><a href="about.html">About me</a> <a href="OceanView.html">Ocean View</a> <a href="swimming.html">Swimming</a> <a href="gaming.html">Gaming</a> <a href="BBall.html">Basketball</a></div><div><a href="gaming.html"><img src="images/Gaming-Desktop-Configuration.jpg" width="107" height="239" alt="console" /></a><a href="BBall.html"><img src="images/300px-Basketball_pictogram.svg.png" width="82" height="76" alt="BallinGuy" /></a><a href="swimming.html"><img src="images/swimming.jpg" width="100" height="237" alt="Strokin" /></a></div></div>
    <a href="contactsupport.html">Support </a>
    </body>
    </html>
    and this is what w3c says when I try to validate the page:
    Line 5, Column 131: there is no attribute "fttp-equiv"
    …mputers, swimming" /><meta fttp-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; chars…
    ✉
    You have used the attribute named above in your document, but the document type you are using does not support that attribute for this element. This error is often caused by incorrect use of the "Strict" document type with a document that uses frames (e.g. you must use the "Transitional" document type to get the "target" attribute), or by using vendor proprietary extensions such as "marginheight" (this is usually fixed by using CSS to achieve the desired effect instead).
    This error may also result if the element itself is not supported in the document type you are using, as an undefined element will have no supported attributes; in this case, see the element-undefined error message for further information.
    How to fix: check the spelling and case of the element and attribute, (Remember XHTML is all lower-case) and/or check that they are both allowed in the chosen document type, and/or use CSS instead of this attribute. If you received this error when using the <embed> element to incorporate flash media in a Web page, see the FAQ item on valid flash.
    What in the world does this mean, because I am seriously lost on this, and the only way I could get around this was to completely remove the entire line, "<meta name="" content="Zachariah Lloyd, basketball, computers" /><meta fttp-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />", which removed all of my meta tags completely, in order to validate it?? I cannot see what is setting this thing off like that, I have never gottena validation error before, and I now know that they are written as meaningless gibberish that does not even remotely explain what is wrong, at least not to me....
    Please help!!!!

    Line 4 and line 5 are trying to do the same thing. Take out the
    <meta fttp-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
    line entirely and you will be good.

  • Action with out validation still showing error messages

    Hello, I have a save action on a PopUp thats has the "with out validation" checked but still the error messages are shown... the problem is that y want to validate the fields by myself, not let the framework do it.
    The other question I had is, is there a way to show the validation messages from the framework into the popup? because there are showing in the main window.
    Thanks.

    the problem is the acceptable range is wrong or probably wrong.  this is resulting in your download speed being lower than the acceptable range and therefore shown in red
    If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • Configuration validation resulted in error(s)

    Hi,
    I am facing a problem in configurator,we are using deferred booking workflow.When we are creating new orders with ATO/PTO items the standard BOOK Node in the workflow is getting completed with result Incomplete.
    The error message on sales order, which we can see from View all open messages, is saying as"Configurator validation resulted in error(s)".
    When we copy the above sales order which is failing with above error and create a new order, the new order is getting booked successfully.We are not changing anything in the copied order.
    Also the deferred workflow is not giving any issues when creating a sales order using the Standard item.The OM debug is also not suggesting anything related to this.
    Please let me know if anyone have come across this issue.
    Thanks!

    Thanks Sandeep for ur reply on this..
    I followed the process u mentioned but it didnt work.Actually as I mentioned in my first question, this issue is coming up only when we are creating new sales order.If we copy the sales order which is not getting booked then the new one(copied) sales order's gets booked correctly.Though the copied sales order also have same configuration.
    I also tried to validate the Configuration for the sales order having issue using the api CZ_CONFIG_API_PUB.verify_configuration and this resulting as SUCCESS.
    Is there any thing in the deferred booking process which may cause this issue?
    Also the error message Configuration Validation resulted in errors is coming through a exception, and the exception is being used in CZ_BATCH_VALIDATE.The batch validate is being called from Send_Input_xml procedure.It seems if we copy the order this procedure for batch validate is not being called.
    but i m not getting any clue in Send_Input_xml procedure abt why exception is being raised.
    Thanks!

  • Requirement with hierarchical query results

    I've a table contains the following columns and the data
    create table test_test2 (do_id_tp varchar2(32),do_id number ,do_up_tp varchar2(32),do_up_id number)
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',100170,'A_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('P_G',1001052,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001054,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001055,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('P_G',1001037,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('P_G',1001038,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001053,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001056,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001052,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001051,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('P_G',100001,'R_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('P_G',1001031,'R_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('P_G',1001035,'R_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',100170,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001054,'A_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001055,'A_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001053,'A_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001056,'A_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001051,'A_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001052,'A_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',100001,'P_G',100001);In the above data R_S is at high level (Means P_G and A_S should depend on R_S)
    similarly P_G is next level ( A_S should depend on P_G OR P_G depends on P_G)
    the lower level is A_S ( A_S depends on A_S)
    So i tried the following query which gives the child list of a parent
    SELECT  DO_UP_TP,DO_UP_ID ,do_id_tp,wm_concat( CONNECT_BY_ROOT  do_id) 
                                    FROM test_test2
                                    where do_up_id=100001
                                       CONNECT BY  nocycle PRIOR do_up_id = do_id
                                       group  by  DO_UP_TP,DO_UP_ID ,do_id_tp;The requirement is for each do_up_id ( i'll get a list of do_id (which are in wm_concat).).
    i've to check in flag column in Following table
    create table check_test2 (d_id ) as
    select do_up_id from test_test2 union
    select do_id from test_test2   
    alter table check_test2 add (flag char(1) DEFAULT 'N')For Ex: R_S (100001) has the childs P_G(100001),P_G(1001031),P_G(1001035) {This is a branch in a Tree}
    Now first i've to check R_S(100001) is active or not in the check_test2 table, If 'N' then check it's child's flag until it finds no more childs.
    If no child is having 'Y' then mark the entire branch as 'N'
    This i've to do for all the do_up_id in TEST_TEST2 table.
    I tried the following package plz correct me as per requirement
    CREATE OR REPLACE package USPF_APR.test_pak1 as
    FUNCTION map_object ( obj_typ_in VARCHAR2 ) RETURN VARCHAR2;
      CURSOR c_c1
        IS
         select * from test_test2 where (do_id in (100001) or do_up_id in (100001));
        TYPE test_ttyp IS TABLE OF c_c1%ROWTYPE INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
    procedure search_obj(obj_type varchar2);
    end;
    CREATE OR REPLACE package body USPF_APR.test_pak1 as
    FUNCTION map_object ( obj_typ_in VARCHAR2 ) RETURN VARCHAR2
         IS
      begin
           dbms_output.put_line ('Hello');
      return 'abc';
    end;
    PROCEDURE search_obj (obj_type VARCHAR2)
       IS
          test_tab   test_ttyp;
          test_tab_r   c_c1%ROWTYPE;
          dep_up_id NUMBER;
          dep_id NUMBER;
          con_dep_up_id VARCHAR2(2100);
          con_dep_id VARCHAR2(2100);
       BEGIN
          OPEN c_c1;
            LOOP
                 Fetch c_c1 into test_tab_r;
                 exit when c_c1%NOTFOUND;
                 test_tab(test_tab.COUNT + 1) := test_tab_r;
             END LOOP;
            CLOSE c_c1;  
                  DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ('Test_tab.count is ...'|| test_tab.COUNT);
            FOR i IN 1 .. test_tab.COUNT LOOP
                                   WITH T AS
                          ( SELECT test_tab(i).do_id   , test_tab(i).do_up_id
                              FROM DUAL)
                               SELECT test_tab(i).do_up_id ,wm_concat( CONNECT_BY_ROOT test_tab(i).do_id)  INTO dep_up_id ,dep_id
                                    FROM T
                                    CONNECT BY  nocycle PRIOR test_tab(i).do_up_id=test_tab(i).do_id
                                       group  by test_tab(i).do_up_id;
                                     con_dep_id := con_dep_id || ',' || dep_id;                         
                      DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ('Value of dep_id'||con_dep_id );
           END LOOP;
            DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ('.....****************************...');
             ----   Here need to compare with check_test2 table  for the active ness of the id  in where condition i've to pass the con_dep_id
             ---    But how to differentiate  For which parent the child is checking the childs
             --   The invalid records( where  for ex:do_up_id =100001 ) should be removed form test_tab   Or the valid records can be copied to another associative array having the same structure as test_tab
        END;
       END;
    EXEC TEST_PAK1.search_obj ('Hi');
    I even confused with
    SELECT test_tab(i).do_up_id ,wm_concat( CONNECT_BY_ROOT test_tab(i).do_id)  INTO dep_up_id ,dep_id
    because wm_concat gives me ' , ' sepearated values where they can't fit into dep_id variablecreating global temporary tables will be useful or not !!!
    Plz help me
    Edited by: smile on Jan 5, 2012 10:23 PM

    I've a table contains the following columns and the data
    create table test_test2 (do_id_tp varchar2(32),do_id number ,do_up_tp varchar2(32),do_up_id number)
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',100170,'A_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('P_G',1001052,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001054,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001055,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('P_G',1001037,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('P_G',1001038,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001053,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001056,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001052,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001051,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('P_G',100001,'R_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('P_G',1001031,'R_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('P_G',1001035,'R_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',100170,'P_G',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001054,'A_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001055,'A_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001053,'A_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001056,'A_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001051,'A_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',1001052,'A_S',100001);
    insert into test_test2 values('A_S',100001,'P_G',100001);In the above data R_S is at high level (Means P_G and A_S should depend on R_S)
    similarly P_G is next level ( A_S should depend on P_G OR P_G depends on P_G)
    the lower level is A_S ( A_S depends on A_S)
    So i tried the following query which gives the child list of a parent
    SELECT  DO_UP_TP,DO_UP_ID ,do_id_tp,wm_concat( CONNECT_BY_ROOT  do_id) 
                                    FROM test_test2
                                    where do_up_id=100001
                                       CONNECT BY  nocycle PRIOR do_up_id = do_id
                                       group  by  DO_UP_TP,DO_UP_ID ,do_id_tp;The requirement is for each do_up_id ( i'll get a list of do_id (which are in wm_concat).).
    i've to check in flag column in Following table
    create table check_test2 (d_id ) as
    select do_up_id from test_test2 union
    select do_id from test_test2   
    alter table check_test2 add (flag char(1) DEFAULT 'N')For Ex: R_S (100001) has the childs P_G(100001),P_G(1001031),P_G(1001035) {This is a branch in a Tree}
    Now first i've to check R_S(100001) is active or not in the check_test2 table, If 'N' then check it's child's flag until it finds no more childs.
    If no child is having 'Y' then mark the entire branch as 'N'
    This i've to do for all the do_up_id in TEST_TEST2 table.
    I tried the following package plz correct me as per requirement
    CREATE OR REPLACE package USPF_APR.test_pak1 as
    FUNCTION map_object ( obj_typ_in VARCHAR2 ) RETURN VARCHAR2;
      CURSOR c_c1
        IS
         select * from test_test2 where (do_id in (100001) or do_up_id in (100001));
        TYPE test_ttyp IS TABLE OF c_c1%ROWTYPE INDEX BY PLS_INTEGER;
    procedure search_obj(obj_type varchar2);
    end;
    CREATE OR REPLACE package body USPF_APR.test_pak1 as
    FUNCTION map_object ( obj_typ_in VARCHAR2 ) RETURN VARCHAR2
         IS
      begin
           dbms_output.put_line ('Hello');
      return 'abc';
    end;
    PROCEDURE search_obj (obj_type VARCHAR2)
       IS
          test_tab   test_ttyp;
          test_tab_r   c_c1%ROWTYPE;
          dep_up_id NUMBER;
          dep_id NUMBER;
          con_dep_up_id VARCHAR2(2100);
          con_dep_id VARCHAR2(2100);
       BEGIN
          OPEN c_c1;
            LOOP
                 Fetch c_c1 into test_tab_r;
                 exit when c_c1%NOTFOUND;
                 test_tab(test_tab.COUNT + 1) := test_tab_r;
             END LOOP;
            CLOSE c_c1;  
                  DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ('Test_tab.count is ...'|| test_tab.COUNT);
            FOR i IN 1 .. test_tab.COUNT LOOP
                                   WITH T AS
                          ( SELECT test_tab(i).do_id   , test_tab(i).do_up_id
                              FROM DUAL)
                               SELECT test_tab(i).do_up_id ,wm_concat( CONNECT_BY_ROOT test_tab(i).do_id)  INTO dep_up_id ,dep_id
                                    FROM T
                                    CONNECT BY  nocycle PRIOR test_tab(i).do_up_id=test_tab(i).do_id
                                       group  by test_tab(i).do_up_id;
                                     con_dep_id := con_dep_id || ',' || dep_id;                         
                      DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ('Value of dep_id'||con_dep_id );
           END LOOP;
            DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ('.....****************************...');
             ----   Here need to compare with check_test2 table  for the active ness of the id  in where condition i've to pass the con_dep_id
             ---    But how to differentiate  For which parent the child is checking the childs
             --   The invalid records( where  for ex:do_up_id =100001 ) should be removed form test_tab   Or the valid records can be copied to another associative array having the same structure as test_tab
        END;
       END;
    EXEC TEST_PAK1.search_obj ('Hi');
    I even confused with
    SELECT test_tab(i).do_up_id ,wm_concat( CONNECT_BY_ROOT test_tab(i).do_id)  INTO dep_up_id ,dep_id
    because wm_concat gives me ' , ' sepearated values where they can't fit into dep_id variablecreating global temporary tables will be useful or not !!!
    Plz help me
    Edited by: smile on Jan 5, 2012 10:23 PM

  • W3c validator: looking for suggestions

    Hi all,
    can anybody help me with this?
    I tried to validate the following page:
    www.giuseppeguzzardi.com
    I did this because the page was not correctly visible in
    Netscape. I solved the incompatibility problems and now it is
    visible.
    The point is that now the validator shows the following
    errors:
    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.giuseppeguzzardi.com%2F&charset=%28dete ct+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&verbose=1
    Honestly I doubt that all these errors really need to be
    solved, for example the tag alt that is indicated as an error is
    related to immages that are only decorative.
    The height of the table are necessary for the visualization
    of the background immages and the same background images are
    necessary also for layout reasons.
    The thing that I really don' t know anything about is the
    doctype declaration at the very beginning of the page code.
    But the only thing I know is that if I write this
    declaration, Netscape screws up all the tables.
    Has anyone of you encountered similar problems? In how far is
    it recomendable to really consider all errors indicated by the w3c
    validator?
    Thanks a lot for any helpful suggestions,
    SuperGuz

    On 08 Mar 2007 in macromedia.dreamweaver, SuperGuz wrote:
    > Hi all,
    >
    > can anybody help me with this?
    > I tried to validate the following page:
    > www.giuseppeguzzardi.com
    >
    > I did this because the page was not correctly visible in
    Netscape. I
    > solved the incompatibility problems and now it is
    visible.
    > The point is that now the validator shows the following
    errors:
    >
    >
    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.giuseppeguzzardi.c
    > om%2F&chars
    et=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline&verbose=1
    >
    > Honestly I doubt that all these errors really need to be
    solved, for
    > example the tag alt that is indicated as an error is
    related to
    > immages that are only decorative.
    Those are small, but they're easily corrected, and the alt
    attribute is
    an accessibility issue. Alt attributes are used by screen
    readers to
    help describe the page.
    > The height of the table are necessary for the
    visualization of the
    > background immages and the same background images are
    necessary also
    > for layout reasons.
    >
    > The thing that I really don' t know anything about is
    the doctype
    > declaration at the very beginning of the page code.
    http://alistapart.com/stories/doctype/
    The big deal is that if you don't have a doctype, it's
    unpredictable
    how browsers will display a page. With a doctype, browsers go
    into
    standards mode and it's fairly predictable.
    > But the only thing I know is that if I write this
    declaration,
    > Netscape screws up all the tables.
    Truth be told, Netscape is not a big consideration; I rarely
    see it in
    website stats. The browsers you should consider:
    - Internet Explorer 6
    - Firefox; I don't see much difference in page rendering
    between FF1.5
    and FF2
    - IE7
    - Safari
    Also, the rule of thumb to make your life easier is to design
    to
    FireFox, then correct any problems you see in IE.
    > Has anyone of you encountered similar problems? In how
    far is it
    > recomendable to really consider all errors indicated by
    the w3c
    > validator?
    If you understand the error and its implications, then by all
    means,
    ignore them. I personally find that correcting validation
    errors makes
    code easier to understand, debug and maintain.
    Joe Makowiec
    http://makowiec.net/
    Email:
    http://makowiec.net/email.php

  • Can't hide validation results

    After validating my document using the W3C Validator within Dreamweaver, I was unable to hide specific validation results. I would click "hide" and the error would still appear when I revalidate my code.
    I then installed a validation extension (http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/exchange/index.cfm?event=extensionDetail&extid=2188524), which didn't work either. I removed this extension and now the option to "hide" validation results through the W3C validator is gone altogether.
    Anyone else having this problem or have possible solutions?
    Thanks!

    Some things to try:
    Hit F7 to hide the results panel.
    Disable Extensions from Extension Manager.
    Close DW.  Restart computer. Launch DW
    Delete corrupted Cache and/or Personal Configuration folder.
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/494811
    Nancy O.

  • [svn:fx-3.x] 16321: Backport trunk rev 15228 to fix bug SDK-25731 - Clearing validation result  (via 'errorString') prevents new validations.

    Revision: 16321
    Revision: 16321
    Author:   [email protected]
    Date:     2010-05-25 15:01:42 -0700 (Tue, 25 May 2010)
    Log Message:
    Backport trunk rev 15228 to fix bug SDK-25731 - Clearing validation result (via 'errorString') prevents new validations.
    I tried to do this with svn merge and it didn't work so I merged it by hand.  The bug file seems to work correctly now.
    Ticket Links:
        http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-25731
    Modified Paths:
        flex/sdk/branches/3.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/UIComponent.as

  • Every time I create an account with iCloud then try to open it I get wrong ID or password. Even when I enter my birth date I am told it is incorrect. I have done this several times with the same results.

    Every time I create an account with iCloud then try to open it I get an error message: wrong ID or password. Also when I enter my birth date I am told it is incorrect. I have done this several times with the same results.

    Oldcameraman
    Please do not duplicate a thread. The threads are answered as soon as possible. We are not Adobe. Just user to user.
    I have answered your most recent of the duplicates
    Premier Elements 13 Organizer Works. Editor doesn't. Log in doesn't work
    It is uncertain just how far we can go to help you since you do not appear to have Premiere Elements any
    longer.Seems you demanded a refund from Adobe Chat, got it, and now are left with a non purchased program which I
    am not sure can be used.
    Duplicates tend to confuse the person asking the question as well as those attempting to reply. As I suggested in the
    above mentioned thread, try to sort out your situation with Adobe via its Adobe Chat.
    ATR

  • Javascript banners & W3C validation

    I had the understanding that the new way that DW inserts
    flash using javascript would eliminate the validation problems in
    W3C validator. But that is not the case with my flash banners.
    Was I missinformed?
    And is there an easy fix to stop W3C complaining about
    "EMBED" etc.?

    Are you using DW 8.0.2? It gets around the problem of the
    need to click on
    the Active region to 'activate it'. But the code does not
    validate,
    although it works just fine.
    Murray --- ICQ 71997575
    Adobe Community Expert
    (If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
    ==================
    http://www.dreamweavermx-templates.com
    - Template Triage!
    http://www.projectseven.com/go
    - DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
    Tutorials & Resources
    http://www.macromedia.com/support/search/
    - Macromedia (MM) Technotes
    ==================
    "Magooi" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:en700l$p33$[email protected]..
    >I had the understanding that the new way that DW inserts
    flash using
    >javascript
    > would eliminate the validation problems in W3C
    validator. But that is not
    > the
    > case with my flash banners.
    >
    > Was I missinformed?
    >
    > And is there an easy fix to stop W3C complaining about
    "EMBED" etc.?
    >

Maybe you are looking for