Confusion over named users

If I have 10 Oracle servers and 20 people accessing them, how many named user licenses do I need to buy? Do I need 20 named users, or do I need 10x20 = 200 named users?

Check this note,
http://oraclestore.oracle.com/OA_HTML/ibeCCtpSctDspRte.jsp?section=11365&media=os_user_minimums
* Oracle Database Standard Edition can only be licensed on servers that have a maximum capacity of 4 sockets. If licensing by Named User Plus, the minimum is 5 Named User Plus licenses.Additionally, it may be licensed on a single cluster of servers supporting up to a maximum of four sockets .
Also, the license can't shared among servers. You need to license each server properly.

Similar Messages

FWB 00013 "You do not have enough Named User licenses" error

I have recently installed Edge XI 3.1. I converted my old 6.5 installation to the new Edge framework and brought over all existing userids.
In Edge, I am licensed for 55 Named and 20 Concurrent. I went through the Properties for each and every User I have to count how many were defined as Named - there were only 3, (and they happened to all have been General Supervisors in the old 6.5 version - so they migrated over to XI 3.1 as Named).
When I try to modify an existing user from Concurrent to Named, (CMC/Users and Groups/Properties tab of the User, under Connection Type), I get the error message, "FWB 00013 You do not have enough Named User licenses to make this user a named user. You have 55 Named User licenses."
It thinks I have already used up all of my 55 Named User licenses, but there are only 3 userids that are marked as Named.
However, when I look at CMC/Settings/View global system metrics, it shows a count of 55 Named Existing User Accounts.
I need to be able to mark certain users as Named instead of Concurrent, but am not able to due to error.
Has anyone seen or experienced this? Any suggestions?
Thanks.

Tim, thanks for your reply - and yes, you're right...
I heard from SAP Support and was notified that this is a known issue with XI3.1 Edge. They say an enhancement request has already been raised with the Product Group - although there is no ETA for when a fix will be released.
The current workaround is to delete the existing concurrent user that you want to be a named user. After deleting the user, then re-add the same user as a named user. This works, but is a cumbersome task if you have a lot of named user licenses!
Additionally, if you want to add a brand-new named user - you still get the same error. So a brand-new user would need to be created as concurrent, deleted, and re-added as named. Convoluted? Yes.
Thanks again for your input.
Angelia

How to use the same Windows-Profile for over 700 Users?

Dear admins,
i´d like to use one (1!) shared windows profile to serv over 700 user-accounts in our school. But there is a little complication in the WGM.
I just tried to check all users and entered the path of the shared profile right in the windows tab.
For example \\Server\Profiles\oneforallprofile
Unfortunately the WGM put the user´s shortname behind this path.
For example: \\Server\Profiles\oneforallprofile\mistersmith
or \\Server\Profiles\oneforallprofile\sallymiller and so on.
By changing this preference one by one it works, but of course i need a solution to do that for all users.
Does anyone know how to set one Profile for all students?
Thanks for your help!
Rolf
XServe G5 Mac OS X (10.4.5) Educational System Administrator

Hello Prasad,
Most likely the user km_admin still has system principal roles assigned, even though you removed the Super Admin role, you should check that this user doesn't have any other admin roles, otherwise it will be considered a System Principal user and will therefore still have access to all content. For more information see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/19/56f28fbd4e11d5993b00508b6b8b11/frameset.htm
Try creating a new user with just read access to the content and you should see that it will not be able to make any changes etc.
Regards,
Lorcan.

I have a windows vista pc and want to use migration assistant to copy files over. From what I understand, it will copy over my user profile and settings as well. Is there anyway to just copy files?

Hey everyone, I just bought a new macbook pro 13-inch (late 2011 model) and I want to use migration assistant to copy over my photos, iTunes library, documents, etc. I know this can be done wirelessly or by connecting the two computers by Ethernet cable (windows vista pc --> macbook pro). Which is faster?
I also have heard that using migration assistant copies over the user file as well and makes it the new one on the mac. I would only like to copy over files, not user settings. How do I do this?
Thanks!
P.S. I'm assuming that when my iTunes library is copied, the mp3 files are copied too. Could someone please confirm this?

http://www.apple.com/support/switch101/
http://www.macworld.com/article/153952/2010/09/superguide_switchingtoamac.html?l src=nl_mwweek_h_cbstories

Installed the RDS 2012 Server License per user CAL (5pcs) after not allow over two users remote desktop connection problem

I have successfully to installed the RDS 2012 Server R2 per user CAL (5pcs) Open License after is found not allow over two users to remote desktop connection on this Server problem, I try to uninstall the license and then (internet on-line & telephone
call Microsoft Activate Center get the activate key) to reinstall is still same of the result on below problem.
Select a user disconnect so that you can sign in.
There are too many users signed in
User1 Active
User2 Active
() Force disconnect of the user

Hi,
In addition you can also refer following article for RDL configuration.
RD Licensing Configuration on Windows Server 2012
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askperf/archive/2013/09/20/rd-licensing-configuration-on-windows-server-2012.aspx
Hope it helps!
Thanks.
Dharmesh Solanki
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Anonymous access with named users

Hi!
I am trying to set up anonymous access with named users on EP6 SP9. I am using Database only as UME Data storage. I have applied the note #728106, since most of the content is html-pages on the KM.
I defined the UME settings ume.login.guest_user.uniqueids=anon01,anon02
ume.login.anonymous_user.mode=1
Restarted the server and attached user account into roles (which contain only anonymous content).
I then accessed the page /irj/portal/anonymous (or the longer version /irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.portal.navigation.portallauncher.anonymous) and everything was fine. However I wasn't able to get the portal working with /irj/portal/anonymous?j_user=anon02. I always received Portal runtime error. From the logs I saw that the portal tried to access as user anon01.
When I changed the UME settings into
ume.login.guest_user.uniqueids=anon02,anon01
I was able to get the anon02 user account working, but not /irj/portal/anonymous?j_user=anon01. From the logs I saw that the portal tried to access as user anon02.
Both user account are using the same rule, portal desktop and framework page. I can see the correct (and different) TLN for each user only in the content are I see this error.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Petri

I need to switch between two named anonymous users.
It works fine using http://<server>:<port>/irj/portal?j_user=<first_Guest_user>&j_password=<pwd_of_first_Guest_user>&login_submit=true
Then to switch to the other user I must do a log-off or close the browser and input the other url http://<server>:<port>/irj/portal?j_user=<second_Guest_user>&j_password=<pwd_of_second_Guest_user>&login_submit=true
I developed a servlet to switch the users using IAuthentication (method forceLogoffUser) and then redirect to the respective url. But when I call forceLogoffUser method I get a login screen and the script stop executing. Passing 'returnURL' parameter did not work.
Parameters:
req - HttpServletRequest
resp - HttpServletResponse
returnURL - url to use to logon again.
Is there a way to switch automaticaly between the two named anonymous users?

BPM Automated Activity: Technical User vs Named User

Hi Folks,
I've implemented a number of working BPM prototypes and now our customers are so interested they want us to implement a number of productive solutions for different process scenarios. Technically we all know that for the automated activity we can either use a logical destination or a service group which in both cases will mean a number of alternatives for authentication to the backend to execute the service operation in the automated activity. In our scenarios so far we have tested both approaches i.e. Service Group and Logical destination using a technical user for both cases (For SG, technical user in the physical system assigned to the SG)
My question is are you using a technical user to authenticate to the backend in either case or are you forwarding credentials of a named user involved in the specific process instance to be authenticated to the backend and in case of the latter how do you achieve this (apart from ensuring this user also exists in the backend)? The dilemma is if (by SAP agreement) we can use a technical user then what (apart from our ethics) stops us from only getting BPM licences and using a technical user(s) for most of our data maintenance transactions and by extension what prevents the same approach being used via non-SAP BPM tools (such as AquaLogic). I know there may be different arrangements specific to an organisation's license agreement and relationship with SAP but what is the general approach out there
Thanks for sharing your feedabck

Hi Anna,
Please check the section 'ABAP webservice' in the document
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/10271ce0-d613-2d10-a094-d4d693cd7b43?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true
Anil

VolanoMark is slow over 8 users - JRockit 5.0SP1/Linux ia32

Hello,
Using the VolanoMark benchmark
http://www.volano.com/benchmarks.html
works fine up to 8 users per room (3% CPU idle)
$ java ... COM.volano.Mark -rooms 1 -users 8
but over 8 users, sometime abruptly slows down
(> 90% CPU idle) as if a timeout had been introduced.
Instrumenting the code, it appears that a wait()
that takes usually less that 1 ms, takes now 38 ms.
(in COM.volano.t)
On ia32/Linux, only with JRockit 5.0 (OK with 1.4.2)
# dual Intel PentiumIII
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 4)
Linux 2.4.21-27.ELsmp
glibc-2.3.2-95.30
java version "1.5.0_02"
Did someone else observe such a behavior ?
Some JRockit options to solve that problem ?
Thanks
Denis

Hi Denis!
You can email the JRA recordings to [email protected] and refer to this thread in the forum.
Thanks,
/Helena
I've collected data for JRA before and after the slowdown
(users=8/9) - the same proportion of Fat locks in
COM.volano.ae (subclass of COM.volano.t calling wait()) ...
but divided by 20 ...
How can I post these files to you ?
Thanks,
Denis

Why do I have to contact my reseller to have trial named-user licences (that neither I or my reseller requested) removed from my CC account?

After buying 50 device licenses for Dreamweaver, 50 named-user trial licences were added to my CC account (along with the 50 device licences). The trials expired after 1 month and now the team management interface reports payment issues and that that I must contact my reseller to remove the named-user licences. The reseller did not ask for these named-user licences to be added and neither did I. How do I get these named-user licences removed? Adobe support tell me that I have to raise an order with my reseller (for the licences that I don't want) and then cancel the order to have the named-user licences removed. That solution sounds stupid frankly so we won't be doing that.

I checked & found that since it is an indirect purchase, you will have to contact reseller to get the seats removed. Reseller needs to place zero value order & return the order which will remove the trial seats.
Regards
Rajshree

Need help getting a list of named users

Hi all, is there a way to get a list of all named users in the system? I can't find any filters for it in the management console.

run this query in query builder.
SELECT si_name FROM CI_SYSTEMOBJECTS WHERE SI_KIND = 'USER'
AND SI_NAMEDUSER=1

Still confused over fup changes to Total BB option...

There still seems to be confusion over the planned changes for Total BB Option 1 customers.
Although KerryG has informed us that the monthly allowance will remain at 10Gb and the charge for additional use will be changing to £5 per 5Gb, BT customer services seem to think the extra usage charge remains the same as it is now.
Please see posts from KerryG and bobm here -
http://community.bt.com/t5/BB-in-Home/WHERE-IS-OUR-USAGE-MONITOR-BT/m-p/41085#M24680
Does anyone have any further info please ?

Hi Del
I can confirm that the info I provided on the earlier thread was correct. I am sorry if people have received other information when calling in. I have fed this back to the relevant teams to make sure all advisors are aware of these recent changes.
To clarify, the position for BT Total Broadband Option 1 is:
Usage allowance – will remain at 10GB
Additional usage charges – they will be charged at 5GB for £5 (rather than 1GB for £1) as from November 1st 2010.
As mentioned before, there are a couple of links that may be useful for those who think they may be likely to incur additional usage charges and wish to review which broadband option is best for them:
Details of usage allowances for each option
Details of options for upgrading your broadband package
Thx
Kerry
Retired BTCare Community Manager - StephanieG and SeanD are your new Community Managers
If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

Connection Type - Concurrent or Named User

Post Author: Rohini
CA Forum: Administration
Hi,
     We are using BOE XI R2. How can I check if a user logged in to BOE is a concurrent user or named user?
Thanks,
Rohini.

Post Author: Rohini
CA Forum: Administration
Thanks for replying! My bad... I didn't ask what I exactly was looking for.
I wanted to see if there is any Audit report, or view in CMC that shows me list of users logged in and connection type for each user. We have 10 concurrent licenses and sometimes when the # of users logged in exceeds to 10, all users get error message that # of concurrent users exceeded 10.
For eg. I would expect to see something like this:
UserName        LoginDateTime          ConnectionType
user1                03/27/08 08:00:01         Concurrent user
user2                03/27/08 08:10:11         Concurrent user
user3                03/27/08 08:05:50         Named user
user10              03/27/08 08:15:20         Concurrent user
So, I want to see a summary details of all the users who are logged in is Named User or Concurrent user.
Thanks,
Rohini.

Named User Licensing by Developer or Emailed User getting report?

If we get named user licenses for BI Publisher for use against custom tables,
so 5 users can log in and build/run reports...
.. and if those users schedule reports with different parameters,
and the report outputs are emailed daily to 20 other folk as PDFs
( who never go to BI Publisher web page or log into BI Publisher )...
... does Oracle count this as requiring 5 named users or 25 named users?
Someone is telling me it's 25 named licenses we'd need?
TIA
Karl

Hi,
Did you ever find an answer on this?
I'm currently investigating a prospective use of BI Publisher, and this would make a significant difference as to my recommendation to implement it or not...
- Tony.

You do not have enough Named User Licenses...But I do!

You do not have enough Named User Licenses to make this user a named user. You have 5 Named User Licenses.
On our Test system, I have five named and five concurrent users. I've switched all but two to concurrent, and I cannot switch anyone to Named. I even disabled all the users except two, and I keep getting the error when I try to swith the remaining to Named.
Any ideas?
Thanks!

Joe Parra wrote:
So as an ugly workaroud, we can delete the user and re-create.
This is due to a bug in the product which is currently escalated. The next fixpack released should hopefully fix but I'm noit sure which one it's slated for right now.
Regards,
Tim

Confusion over Native Query Result List

I have this confusion over the field object of a resultList of a Native query. This is because it has contradicted the idea of the books for me.
This is a pure example
@SqlResultSetMapping(name="LoanCapitalization.reportMapping",
columns={
    @ColumnResult(name="policy_number"),
    @ColumnResult(name="policy_holder"),
    @ColumnResult(name="amount"),
    @ColumnResult(name="outstanding_loan"),
    @ColumnResult(name="interest"),
    @ColumnResult(name="amount_to_date"),
    @ColumnResult(name="effective_date"),
    @ColumnResult(name="sub_system_code")
@NamedNativeQuery(name="LoanCapitalization.aggregateStatement", query="SELECT   l.policy_number, l.last_name || ' ' || l.first_name as " +
        "policy_holder, l.amount, c.out_principal_bf as outstanding_loan, c.out_interest_bf as interest, " +
        "SUM (r.repayment_amount) as amount_to_date, c.effective_date, l.sub_system_code FROM loan l JOIN v_latest_capitalization c " +
        "ON l.loan_id = c.loan_id JOIN loan_repayment r ON l.loan_id = r.loan_id WHERE " +
        "c.effective_date BETWEEN ?1 AND ?2 GROUP BY l.policy_number, l.last_name, l.first_name, l.amount, " +
        "c.out_principal_bf, c.out_interest_bf, c.effective_date, l.sub_system_code order by l.sub_system_code, l.last_name",
        resultSetMapping="LoanCapitalization.reportMapping")and
Query query = entityManager.createNamedQuery("LoanCapitalization.aggregateStatement");
        AggregateStatementLoanBalanceReportData data = null;
        List<AggregateStatementLoanBalanceReportData> returnList = new ArrayList<AggregateStatementLoanBalanceReportData>();
        query.setParameter(1, reportCriteria.getFromDate());
        query.setParameter(2, reportCriteria.getToDate());
        List<Object[]> resultList = query.getResultList();
        System.out.println("resultList.size() >>>>>>>>>> " + resultList.size());
        for (Object[] obj : resultList){
            data = new AggregateStatementLoanBalanceReportData();
            System.out.println("(String)obj[1] >>>>>>>>>> " + (String)obj[1]);
            System.out.println("(String)obj[2] >>>>>>>>>> " + (String)obj[2]);
            System.out.println("(String)obj[3] >>>>>>>>>> " + (String)obj[3]);
            System.out.println("(String)obj[4] >>>>>>>>>> " + (String)obj[4]);
            System.out.println("(String)obj[5] >>>>>>>>>> " + (String)obj[5]);
            System.out.println("(String)obj[6] >>>>>>>>>> " + (String)obj[6]);
            data.setPolicyNumber((String)obj[0]);
            data.setName((String)obj[1]);
.......My first shocking surpise is that all the System.out.println() return nulls but
System.out.println("resultList.size() >>>>>>>>>> " + resultList.size()); returned 1.
so can anyone suggest what the problem may be.
Regards,
Michael

I came across your post as I experienced the same problem. As I found no answers I tried different let's say stupid solutions.
The one that solved my problem was to write the name for the @ColumnResult in capitals as I noticed that Oracle transforms the alias column names into capitals. I guess otherwise the mapping doesn't occur correctly.
My example:
@SqlResultSetMappings({
@SqlResultSetMapping(
name = "Customers.searchCustomers",
entities =
@EntityResult(entityClass = Customers.class)
columns =
@ColumnResult(name = "CONTACTDATE"),
@ColumnResult(name = "CONTRACTDATE")
String queryString =
"SELECT c.CUSTOMER_ID, c.LAST_NAME, c.FIRST_NAME, c.OPU, c.CUSTOMER_CORE_ID, " +
"to_char(con.CONTACT_DATE, 'yyyy-dd-mm') AS CONTACTDATE, to_char(contr.CONTRACT_DATE, 'yyyy-dd-mm') AS CONTRACTDATE " +
"FROM CUSTOMERS c " +
"LEFT JOIN CONTACTS con ON con.CUSTOMER_ID = c.CUSTOMER_ID AND con.ACTIVE = '1' " +
"LEFT JOIN CONTRACTS contr ON contr.CUSTOMER_ID = c.CUSTOMER_ID AND contr.ACTIVE = '1' " +
"WHERE c.CAMPAIGN_ID = ?1 AND upper(c.LAST_NAME) LIKE ?2 AND upper(c.FIRST_NAME) LIKE ?3";
query = em.createNativeQuery(queryString,
"Customers.searchCustomers");

Confusion over named users

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for